politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The best betting strategy for tomorrow is do nothing till you’ve seen the numbers
At 11am tomorrow morning Lord Ashcroft’s Scottish single seat polls will be published and will get huge media attention. It is going to be an intensive period for political punters both on the constituency markets and the overall outcome ones.
I think the expected terrible result for Labour has already filtered through to the betting markets, especially the overall majority market. I'm sure casual betters will hammer Labour in the other markets as well.
The wipeout in Scotland newspaper headlines will be nothing new, we've had plenty already, though they'll have more credence.
@Pulpstar I'd prefer it if there was some less bad news for Labour, but I'm not overly hopeful. If the SNP are ahead in seats like Glenrothes, E.Lothian, Glasgow NE, then that will be very unhelpful.
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
You are starting to bewilder me, and I'm sure others, with your constant fiddling and changes, now almost hourly, on your ELBOW.
Before you turn the ELBOW, - which I like - and yourself to a harlequin of fun, and not to be taken seriously, why don't you consider publishing the ELBOW twice a week on say, Tuesday and Friday: come what may and never mind the news headlines.
Do this, up to say the last 3 weeks to the election; then and only then, would it be worth while to publish daily.
But once you've seen the numbers and the bookies have seen the numbers, you're no better off than when neither side had seen the numbers.
Yes, indeed so. So the trick is to try to anticipate.
To my mind the striking thing is the mismatch between the betting (indicating that punters expect around 30-34 SNP seats) and the existing Scottish polls, which indicate an SNP total well over 40 and perhaps over 50. If the Ashcroft poll shows, in aggregate, a similar result to the various Scottish polls, I anticipate that that discrepancy will diminish - i.e. that the spreads and the line will move upwards, and the individual constitency prices for the SNP will shorten.
This seems likely. In principle, there seems to be no reason why Lord Ashcroft's pollsters should find a picture very different from what the others have been finding. It might be the case that the two-stage question will prompt respondents substantially towards the incumbent, to the detriment of the SNP's showing. However, I have a hunch that this won't be so; Scottish voters seem distinctly disgruntled with their (mainly Labour) Westminster MPs.
Economists at Deutsche Bank said yesterday that the UK is on track for a coalition between Labour and the SNP following May’s election – but warned that the British economy would do better in the long term under a deficit-cutting Tory government.
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
Mr. Owls, Galloway's an arse, but he's a democratically elected arse.
A more serious problem is the de facto blasphemy law the media has mostly adopted.
On Mrs Cameron - unless she's the decision-maker, that's as valid as attacking an employee of Boots for what their CEO does.
It's also hypocritical to say "Hurrah for the EU" and then complain businesses relocate within it, just as it's stupid to propose high taxes and then complain when businesses go to low tax economies.
Cameron's wife doesn't own the company, does she? (I don't know the answer to this.) If so, presumably she's in the same position as any other employee of a company with its HQ in a tax haven or jurisdiction with a lower tax rate than in the UK - like Switzerland, for instance. And I also assume that she pays income tax etc here.
We're not surely going to say that people shouldn't work for such companies. That might annoy quite a lot of Boots employees, for instance.
Economists at Deutsche Bank said yesterday that the UK is on track for a coalition between Labour and the SNP following May’s election – but warned that the British economy would do better in the long term under a deficit-cutting Tory government.
But once you've seen the numbers and the bookies have seen the numbers, you're no better off than when neither side had seen the numbers.
Yes, indeed so. So the trick is to try to anticipate.
To my mind the striking thing is the mismatch between the betting (indicating that punters expect around 30-34 SNP seats) and the existing Scottish polls, which indicate an SNP total well over 40 and perhaps over 50. If the Ashcroft poll shows, in aggregate, a similar result to the various Scottish polls, I anticipate that that discrepancy will diminish - i.e. that the spreads and the line will move upwards, and the individual constitency prices for the SNP will shorten.
This seems likely. In principle, there seems to be no reason why Lord Ashcroft's pollsters should find a picture very different from what the others have been finding. It might be the case that the two-stage question will prompt respondents substantially towards the incumbent, to the detriment of the SNP's showing. However, I have a hunch that this won't be so; Scottish voters seem distinctly disgruntled with their (mainly Labour) Westminster MPs.
Given yesterday's YouGov poll again showing the SNP with a huge lead, I'd be suspicious of the constituency polling if it did not find very similar results. Since there is no track record of Lord Ashcroft's constituency polls varying that markedly from the national picture, I don't see why it should start now.
I have long been a bull on SNP prospects in constituency betting. As from tomorrow, I expect that the party will be over, at least in terms of being able to back the SNP at odds against in constituencies where they should really be odds on. Ah well, it's lasted a long time.
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
Is this the poll that put Labour 11 points ahead?
I take it that this is not the new Gold Standard?
Yes. It was only a bit of fun.
I wasn't expecting someone to add it to the wikipedia page.
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
Is this the poll that put Labour 11 points ahead?
I take it that this is not the new Gold Standard?
Yes. It was only a bit of fun.
I wasn't expecting someone to add it to the wikipedia page.
They shouldn't do that. Imagine the effect on poor Audrey.
Mr. Owls, Galloway's an arse, but he's a democratically elected arse.
A more serious problem is the de facto blasphemy law the media has mostly adopted.
On Mrs Cameron - unless she's the decision-maker, that's as valid as attacking an employee of Boots for what their CEO does.
It's also hypocritical to say "Hurrah for the EU" and then complain businesses relocate within it, just as it's stupid to propose high taxes and then complain when businesses go to low tax economies.
Snap! Not sure what sort of connection Andy Slaughter is seeking to make because there's no evidence, is there, that Cameron's wife has sought to avoid tax.
Really, it's more of an attempt to do a sort of word-association smear: luxury - tax haven - Cameron. A bit pathetic really.
BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking 5m5 minutes ago Three soldiers on anti-terror patrol in Nice, southern France, wounded in knife attack, French police say http://bbc.in/1LI7Nu8
Blimey! looks like incipient civil war about to start in France.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
Eric Honecker had the right idea. No terrorism on his watch. Sound politics.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
I think it very serious, when terrorists feel free to attack an armed patrol on the streets of Nice and seemingly - till we get more news - get away with it.
BTW, Nice is where I once met an Italian girl from Genoa and had a brief affair; many years ago now.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
But once you've seen the numbers and the bookies have seen the numbers, you're no better off than when neither side had seen the numbers.
Yes, indeed so. So the trick is to try to anticipate.
To my mind the striking thing is the mismatch between the betting (indicating that punters expect around 30-34 SNP seats) and the existing Scottish polls, which indicate an SNP total well over 40 and perhaps over 50. If the Ashcroft poll shows, in aggregate, a similar result to the various Scottish polls, I anticipate that that discrepancy will diminish - i.e. that the spreads and the line will move upwards, and the individual constitency prices for the SNP will shorten.
This seems likely. In principle, there seems to be no reason why Lord Ashcroft's pollsters should find a picture very different from what the others have been finding. It might be the case that the two-stage question will prompt respondents substantially towards the incumbent, to the detriment of the SNP's showing. However, I have a hunch that this won't be so; Scottish voters seem distinctly disgruntled with their (mainly Labour) Westminster MPs.
Given yesterday's YouGov poll again showing the SNP with a huge lead, I'd be suspicious of the constituency polling if it did not find very similar results. Since there is no track record of Lord Ashcroft's constituency polls varying that markedly from the national picture, I don't see why it should start now.
I have long been a bull on SNP prospects in constituency betting. As from tomorrow, I expect that the party will be over, at least in terms of being able to back the SNP at odds against in constituencies where they should really be odds on. Ah well, it's lasted a long time.
I think the party is already pretty much over in the constituency betting, in the last couple of days Ladbrokes have finally moved the SNP to the odds on favourite for my constituency, Stirling, two months too late in my view. I think Ladbrokes could have done a lot better by just polling their Scottish betting shop staff !!
In the unlikely event that Lord A's polling holds out any hope for Labour, this will be quickly extinguished by the SNP deploying it's massive ground resources to squash any remaining SLAB/LibDem aspirations.
Depending how bad things are looking, I wouldn't be surprised if Jim Murphy decides to stand down in favour of Blair McDougall, so Jim can concentrate on Holyrood 2016.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
Eric Honecker had the right idea. No terrorism on his watch. Sound politics.
Yeah: in his case the terror was carried out by the State.
This is the problem when your Party ethos is built up on tabloid newspaper agendas.
What a joke of a Party UKIP is.
The comment from UKIP's chairman that they were "sorry to lose him" seems the strangest part of the story. Surely they should be delighted to lose him?
This is the problem when your Party ethos is built up on tabloid newspaper agendas.
What a joke of a Party UKIP is.
No Joke at all. UKIP get rid of suspected fascist supporting individuals. Unlike labour and Tory who keep there more fascistic members under wraps; or even more reprehensible, make excuses for them.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
I think it very serious, when terrorists feel free to attack an armed patrol on the streets of Nice and seemingly - till we get more news - get away with it.
BTW, Nice is where I once met an Italian girl from Genoa and had a brief affair; many years ago now.
Nice is where I was buzzed on the beach by a military helicopter. In December.
I'd have thought from a betting perspective the impact of the Ashcroft polling might be stronger on the LD and SNP numbers rather than the LAB or CON numbers. Assuming the shrewd souls who bought SNP seats at 20 or less a long time ago haven't cashed out (and why would they ?) they should be sitting very pretty unless tomorrow is much better for Labour than anyone suspects/hopes/fears (delete as appropriate).
The LD situation is more interesting - Ashcroft's constituency polling in England has been fairly positive for the Party and is probably a lot to do with the seat numbers spread being as high as it is. IF it looks as though the LDs will be reduced to 1-2 Scottish MPs that will impact on that figure and make 27.5 look a viable SELL.
OTOH, a more solid LD performance and a retention of say 4-6 seats would be tempting for buyers at 29.5 as it might confirm incumbency and resilience helping prop up the LD seat figure nationally quite apart from any possible gains in rural Wales and the end of the Metropolitan Line.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
Eric Honecker had the right idea. No terrorism on his watch. Sound politics.
Yeah: in his case the terror was carried out by the State.
Not if you behaved. Crime was also low. Sound politics.
Joking aside, I was fascinated by the diabolical psychological techiques employed by the Stasi. They effectively induced madness by conducting long-term interference in dissidents lives. From wiki:
Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim's private or family life. This often included psychological attacks such as breaking into homes and subtly manipulating the contents – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included property damage, sabotage of cars, purposely incorrect medical treatment, smear campaigns including sending falsified compromising photos or documents to the victim's family, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a target's wife. Usually victims had no idea the Stasi were responsible. Many thought they were losing their minds.
So Ed's clean campaign only extends to Mr Cameron - not Mrs Cameron. Are the kids fair game ?
Stay classy Labour.
Unfortunately, there are no such limits to the persistent smearing of Ed M and his immediate family by the pro-Conservative media.
It's not pleasant but somebody did once opine politics was "a rough trade". Still, he had gone through a similar experience to what seems to be a common happening around dockside areas to people in the world's oldest profession.
BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking 6m6 minutes ago French soldiers attacked by knife-wielding man in Nice were patrolling outside a Jewish community centre http://bbc.in/18KhHfO
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
Is this the poll that put Labour 11 points ahead?
I take it that this is not the new Gold Standard?
Yes, that one. That's the only one that's on the record in the last week, and it's not an official VI poll
BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking 5m5 minutes ago Three soldiers on anti-terror patrol in Nice, southern France, wounded in knife attack, French police say http://bbc.in/1LI7Nu8
Blimey! looks like incipient civil war about to start in France.
The BBC article you link to now states that the attacker has been arrested, and that light wounds were suffered by two soldiers of the three strong patrol. It also says that accomplices are on the run.
But once you've seen the numbers and the bookies have seen the numbers, you're no better off than when neither side had seen the numbers.
Yes, indeed so. So the trick is to try to anticipate.
To my mind the striking thing is the mismatch between the betting (indicating that punters expect around 30-34 SNP seats) and the existing Scottish polls, which indicate an SNP total well over 40 and perhaps over 50. If the Ashcroft poll shows, in aggregate, a similar result to the various Scottish polls, I anticipate that that discrepancy will diminish - i.e. that the spreads and the line will move upwards, and the individual constitency prices for the SNP will shorten.
This seems likely. In principle, there seems to be no reason why Lord Ashcroft's pollsters should find a picture very different from what the others have been finding. It might be the case that the two-stage question will prompt respondents substantially towards the incumbent, to the detriment of the SNP's showing. However, I have a hunch that this won't be so; Scottish voters seem distinctly disgruntled with their (mainly Labour) Westminster MPs.
Given yesterday's YouGov poll again showing the SNP with a huge lead, I'd be suspicious of the constituency polling if it did not find very similar results. Since there is no track record of Lord Ashcroft's constituency polls varying that markedly from the national picture, I don't see why it should start now.
I have long been a bull on SNP prospects in constituency betting. As from tomorrow, I expect that the party will be over, at least in terms of being able to back the SNP at odds against in constituencies where they should really be odds on. Ah well, it's lasted a long time.
I think the party is already pretty much over in the constituency betting, in the last couple of days Ladbrokes have finally moved the SNP to the odds on favourite for my constituency, Stirling, two months too late in my view. I think Ladbrokes could have done a lot better by just polling their Scottish betting shop staff !!
In the unlikely event that Lord A's polling holds out any hope for Labour, this will be quickly extinguished by the SNP deploying it's massive ground resources to squash any remaining SLAB/LibDem aspirations.
Depending how bad things are looking, I wouldn't be surprised if Jim Murphy decides to stand down in favour of Blair McDougall, so Jim can concentrate on Holyrood 2016.
The SNP by my reckoning are still odds against in 29 seats right now. If the national polling is anything like correct, that's at least 10 seats too many and probably more.
So Ed's clean campaign only extends to Mr Cameron - not Mrs Cameron. Are the kids fair game ?
Stay classy Labour.
Unfortunately, there are no such limits to the persistent smearing of Ed M and his immediate family by the pro-Conservative media.
It's not pleasant but somebody did once opine politics was "a rough trade". Still, he had gone through a similar experience to what seems to be a common happening around dockside areas to people in the world's oldest profession.
I don't like that sort of smearing no matter which politician or his family are attacked. There are limits and politicians' spouses and children are off limits, it seems to me.
NumbrCrunchrPolitics @NCPoliticsUK 2m2 minutes ago TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
So Ed's clean campaign only extends to Mr Cameron - not Mrs Cameron. Are the kids fair game ?
Stay classy Labour.
Unfortunately, there are no such limits to the persistent smearing of Ed M and his immediate family by the pro-Conservative media.
It's not pleasant but somebody did once opine politics was "a rough trade". Still, he had gone through a similar experience to what seems to be a common happening around dockside areas to people in the world's oldest profession.
I don't like that sort of smearing no matter which politician or his family are attacked. There are limits and politicians' spouses and children are off limits, it seems to me.
Agree completely. The problem is it's completely unenforceable regrettably.
The anti kippers on here are set to make a small fortune selling UKIP on the spreads.
You will probably win a little, but there is a big risk to that strategy.
They are however most likely a Sell though.
Selling UKIP on the spreads at the current price makes little sense. Your risk-reward ratio is massively skewed (and not in your favour!). It's better to bet on one of the over/under markets, eg under 6.5 @ 1.73 Betfair Sportsbook.
BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking 5m5 minutes ago Three soldiers on anti-terror patrol in Nice, southern France, wounded in knife attack, French police say http://bbc.in/1LI7Nu8
Blimey! looks like incipient civil war about to start in France.
The BBC article you link to now states that the attacker has been arrested, and that light wounds were suffered by two soldiers of the three strong patrol. It also says that accomplices are on the run.
No wonder Jews in France are thinking of leaving.
How long can the French state keep this up? Are the army going to be deployed indefinitely to guard places where Jews congregate?
So Ed's clean campaign only extends to Mr Cameron - not Mrs Cameron. Are the kids fair game ?
Stay classy Labour.
Unfortunately, there are no such limits to the persistent smearing of Ed M and his immediate family by the pro-Conservative media.
It's not pleasant but somebody did once opine politics was "a rough trade". Still, he had gone through a similar experience to what seems to be a common happening around dockside areas to people in the world's oldest profession.
I don't like that sort of smearing no matter which politician or his family are attacked. There are limits and politicians' spouses and children are off limits, it seems to me.
Agree completely. The problem is it's completely unenforceable regrettably.
Tbf anyone who goes after a spouse or child in that way is likely to suffer more than the intended victim. Just look at how stupid those who go on and on about Ed's father look, for example.
Being a right twat seems to be the pre-requisite for the position of Universities Minister.
By my reckoning that nitwit spends £24.65 each and every day on coffee.......
That's not posh coffee. That's coffee for those with more money than sense.
It's probably expensive coffee made out of civet cat excrement, or weasel vomit.
Righto. Minister says tuition fees not a problem because same as spending NEARLY £25 every day on a drink made out of cat droppings.
The Evening Standard says that cup of coffee would set you back £70 - so the nearly £25 cup of coffee must be something of a cheapo effort for the 0.01%ers...
Being a right twat seems to be the pre-requisite for the position of Universities Minister.
By my reckoning that nitwit spends £24.65 each and every day on coffee.......
That's not posh coffee. That's coffee for those with more money than sense.
Eh? Wasn't he simply saying that it's equivalent to a graduate spending £2.22 on a coffee each day. Lots of graduates (and non-graduates, for that matter) do so, judging by how busy the take-away coffee places are.
Anyone else see the problem in getting a decent renegotiation settlement when both Osborne and Cameron are such virulent EUphiles?
"The prospect of Osborne playing the decisive role after Cameron in EU negotiations will be seen as a clear sign that the prime minister is determined to keep Britain in the EU – assuming that the negotiations are successful. Osborne regards the negotiations as “doable”.
Osborne believes that Britain enhances its position on the world stage in the EU. The chancellor believes that opponents of British membership are neither coherent nor credible in believing the UK could renegotiate membership terms along the lines of Switzerland and Norway."
Being a right twat seems to be the pre-requisite for the position of Universities Minister.
By my reckoning that nitwit spends £24.65 each and every day on coffee.......
That's not posh coffee. That's coffee for those with more money than sense.
It's probably expensive coffee made out of civet cat excrement, or weasel vomit.
Righto. Minister says tuition fees not a problem because same as spending NEARLY £25 every day on a drink made out of cat droppings.
You don't pay back £9,000 a year, so your maths is wrong. The article explains exactly how he comes up with his figures:
"The Conservative minister, speaking at a science and engineering debate at the Royal Society last month, said: 'First of all it is important that we don't distract from the fact that for students under the system that we have, if you have a great education you only pay back if you're earning over £21,000 and only 9 per cent of your earnings above that.
'What that means is if you earn £30,000 as a graduate you bay back £2.22 a day, now there are people who buy cups of posh coffee for less than that, and I think people recognise that that is a phenomenal investment, it's not just a good investment for the student, but actually it's a good investment for the taxpayer.' "
By the way, I am NOT Stonch and do not own or run a gaff in trendy south-west London.
I am however reminded of some lines from a classic 1980s ditty:
"Propping up the bar at the Finborough Arms A VAT on the slate, please, Stonch, and TSE's looking for a sub OGH is on for a nice little earner Eagles getting flak and he's on to a loser Minding the polls and the social media Looking for a rumour about the latest YouGov Pound to a euro he won't get paid On account of the recession In the fixed-odds betting trade"
Hague has failed to stop the SNP having the casting vote on English laws.
As a result the SNP will have a strong negotiating hand after the general election.
Dog wags tail - not news
Tail wags dog - bad news
Maybe "Yes" should have won?
I think complaining that Scottish MPs can make decisions in a UK House of Parliament after just having had a referendum affirming their place in the union is a bit rich personally.
Comments
Off topic, this guy is one of the few really bright tory sparks
The wipeout in Scotland newspaper headlines will be nothing new, we've had plenty already, though they'll have more credence.
Lol - he's still down the betting shop!
I fully expect Ladbrokes to suspend prices when the poll comes out. @Shadsy is on the ball.
I'd prefer it if there was some less bad news for Labour, but I'm not overly hopeful.
If the SNP are ahead in seats like Glenrothes, E.Lothian, Glasgow NE, then that will be very unhelpful.
Is it official or not?
Nor should he before the poll is published.
TNS have informed me that their phone poll was NOT intended to be a snapshot of voting intention and pv weighting was not used. Have deleted
@Sunil_Prasannan
You are starting to bewilder me, and I'm sure others, with your constant fiddling and changes, now almost hourly, on your ELBOW.
Before you turn the ELBOW, - which I like - and yourself to a harlequin of fun, and not to be taken seriously, why don't you consider publishing the ELBOW twice a week on say, Tuesday and Friday: come what may and never mind the news headlines.
Do this, up to say the last 3 weeks to the election; then and only then, would it be worth while to publish daily.
I hope you're not to cross with my criticism.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2937863/Tory-minister-insists-9-000-year-tuition-fees-not-expensive-cost-posh-coffee-day-repay.html
Being a right twat seems to be the pre-requisite for the position of Universities Minister.
Glasgow East
SNP 2.1
To my mind the striking thing is the mismatch between the betting (indicating that punters expect around 30-34 SNP seats) and the existing Scottish polls, which indicate an SNP total well over 40 and perhaps over 50. If the Ashcroft poll shows, in aggregate, a similar result to the various Scottish polls, I anticipate that that discrepancy will diminish - i.e. that the spreads and the line will move upwards, and the individual constitency prices for the SNP will shorten.
This seems likely. In principle, there seems to be no reason why Lord Ashcroft's pollsters should find a picture very different from what the others have been finding. It might be the case that the two-stage question will prompt respondents substantially towards the incumbent, to the detriment of the SNP's showing. However, I have a hunch that this won't be so; Scottish voters seem distinctly disgruntled with their (mainly Labour) Westminster MPs.
Andy Slaughter MP @hammersmithandy 13m13 minutes ago
David Cameron slams tax avoiders while his wife - er- works for a company based in a tax haven http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2937589/Awkward-Luxury-leather-goods-firm-Smythson-PM-s-wife-Samantha-Cameron-works-based-tax-haven …
Economists at Deutsche Bank said yesterday that the UK is on track for a coalition between Labour and the SNP following May’s election – but warned that the British economy would do better in the long term under a deficit-cutting Tory government.
Same Brit media that cried #JeSuisCharlie, wailed for free speech, now campaigning to stop @georgegalloway appearing on @bbcquestiontime
I take it that this is not the new Gold Standard?
A more serious problem is the de facto blasphemy law the media has mostly adopted.
On Mrs Cameron - unless she's the decision-maker, that's as valid as attacking an employee of Boots for what their CEO does.
It's also hypocritical to say "Hurrah for the EU" and then complain businesses relocate within it, just as it's stupid to propose high taxes and then complain when businesses go to low tax economies.
We're not surely going to say that people shouldn't work for such companies. That might annoy quite a lot of Boots employees, for instance.
I have long been a bull on SNP prospects in constituency betting. As from tomorrow, I expect that the party will be over, at least in terms of being able to back the SNP at odds against in constituencies where they should really be odds on. Ah well, it's lasted a long time.
Wait a minute
Has Dan Hodges tweeted something negative about Cameron ?!
That's the real story there !
I wasn't expecting someone to add it to the wikipedia page.
Thank heavens for good sense at the FA when the England job was up -ignoring Harry and his lackeys in the media and in football.
A few Elmbridge voters amongst them, I shouldn't wonder....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-31097569
Really, it's more of an attempt to do a sort of word-association smear: luxury - tax haven - Cameron. A bit pathetic really.
Mirror image of this website ?
Three soldiers on anti-terror patrol in Nice, southern France, wounded in knife attack, French police say http://bbc.in/1LI7Nu8
Blimey! looks like incipient civil war about to start in France.
Hollande's in catch-22. Withdraw the army and people may feel afraid (and it could make them more open to attack). Have patrols and guards on duty and they're targets.
BTW, Nice is where I once met an Italian girl from Genoa and had a brief affair; many years ago now.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-31108823
This is the problem when your Party ethos is built up on tabloid newspaper agendas.
What a joke of a Party UKIP is.
In the unlikely event that Lord A's polling holds out any hope for Labour, this will be quickly extinguished by the SNP deploying it's massive ground resources to squash any remaining SLAB/LibDem aspirations.
Depending how bad things are looking, I wouldn't be surprised if Jim Murphy decides to stand down in favour of Blair McDougall, so Jim can concentrate on Holyrood 2016.
Stay classy Labour.
Con Minority, SNP Absteining in trouble ?
Sounds like you had a better trip!
I'd have thought from a betting perspective the impact of the Ashcroft polling might be stronger on the LD and SNP numbers rather than the LAB or CON numbers. Assuming the shrewd souls who bought SNP seats at 20 or less a long time ago haven't cashed out (and why would they ?) they should be sitting very pretty unless tomorrow is much better for Labour than anyone suspects/hopes/fears (delete as appropriate).
The LD situation is more interesting - Ashcroft's constituency polling in England has been fairly positive for the Party and is probably a lot to do with the seat numbers spread being as high as it is. IF it looks as though the LDs will be reduced to 1-2 Scottish MPs that will impact on that figure and make 27.5 look a viable SELL.
OTOH, a more solid LD performance and a retention of say 4-6 seats would be tempting for buyers at 29.5 as it might confirm incumbency and resilience helping prop up the LD seat figure nationally quite apart from any possible gains in rural Wales and the end of the Metropolitan Line.
Joking aside, I was fascinated by the diabolical psychological techiques employed by the Stasi. They effectively induced madness by conducting long-term interference in dissidents lives. From wiki:
Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim's private or family life. This often included psychological attacks such as breaking into homes and subtly manipulating the contents – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included property damage, sabotage of cars, purposely incorrect medical treatment, smear campaigns including sending falsified compromising photos or documents to the victim's family, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a target's wife. Usually victims had no idea the Stasi were responsible. Many thought they were losing their minds.
That's not posh coffee. That's coffee for those with more money than sense.
It's not pleasant but somebody did once opine politics was "a rough trade". Still, he had gone through a similar experience to what seems to be a common happening around dockside areas to people in the world's oldest profession.
French soldiers attacked by knife-wielding man in Nice were patrolling outside a Jewish community centre http://bbc.in/18KhHfO
Lab 1.8% ahead (cf. 1.7% in the simple average)
http://www.tnsglobal.com/press-release/latest-polling-from-tns-on-uk-voter-intention
http://www.tnsglobal.com/sites/default/files/TNS_BMRB_Tables_-_All_adults.pdf
They are however most likely a Sell though.
How long can the French state keep this up? Are the army going to be deployed indefinitely to guard places where Jews congregate?
As a result the SNP will have a strong negotiating hand after the general election.
Dog wags tail - not news
Tail wags dog - bad news
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/the-70-cup-of-coffee-with-a-dirty-secret-6379689.html
Those scenes in France look a bit like the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
"The prospect of Osborne playing the decisive role after Cameron in EU negotiations will be seen as a clear sign that the prime minister is determined to keep Britain in the EU – assuming that the negotiations are successful. Osborne regards the negotiations as “doable”.
Osborne believes that Britain enhances its position on the world stage in the EU. The chancellor believes that opponents of British membership are neither coherent nor credible in believing the UK could renegotiate membership terms along the lines of Switzerland and Norway."
What a lot of meaningless guff.
"The Conservative minister, speaking at a science and engineering debate at the Royal Society last month, said: 'First of all it is important that we don't distract from the fact that for students under the system that we have, if you have a great education you only pay back if you're earning over £21,000 and only 9 per cent of your earnings above that.
'What that means is if you earn £30,000 as a graduate you bay back £2.22 a day, now there are people who buy cups of posh coffee for less than that, and I think people recognise that that is a phenomenal investment, it's not just a good investment for the student, but actually it's a good investment for the taxpayer.' "
By the way, that civet cat coffee is very nice.
I am however reminded of some lines from a classic 1980s ditty:
"Propping up the bar at the Finborough Arms
A VAT on the slate, please, Stonch, and TSE's looking for a sub
OGH is on for a nice little earner
Eagles getting flak and he's on to a loser
Minding the polls and the social media
Looking for a rumour about the latest YouGov
Pound to a euro he won't get paid
On account of the recession
In the fixed-odds betting trade"
I'll get me trilby...
"I wouldn’t dare to be so uncouth as to suggest [Scottish] Labour are fucked but they’re hardly unfucked either."
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/02/unless-something-changes-soon-scottish-labour-is-doomed/
Other than that, carry on
This is the weasel vomit.