Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Latest polling from Thanet South has Farage trailing the To

SystemSystem Posts: 12,214
edited December 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Latest polling from Thanet South has Farage trailing the Tories by 5% – yet in the betting he’s a 62% chance

So when earlier this month Lord Ashcroft published his latest round there was a rush of activity when apparently obvious bargain appeared. One such one was Nigel Farage’s Thanet South where following the numbers being available the UKIP price of 2/5 eased to 5/6. An earlier Ashcroft poll had had Farage with a 3% lead. The latest put the Tories 5% ahead.

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • I think a named poll would have Farage ahead.

  • Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    Given Farage has far more name recognition than the Tory candidate, he will probably get about a ten points boost in a named poll. That would largely be consistent with a 60% chance of winning.
  • Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited December 2014
    FPT Terminator (x3) for me
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    I wonder if she'd have found it easier to squeeze the Labour vote?

    Although, she would - of course - have lose more votes to UKIP.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited December 2014
    The odds on Labour are rather striking. In the poll they are very close to UKIP and yet the betting markets have them as miles behind the other two. The betting markets might well have this right, but it is an interesting discrepancy.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,534

    Party leaders tend to get a boost where they stand.
  • Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
  • The Tory candidate is a guy who made a principled and honourable decision to defect from UKIP to The Tories, in fact he's an ex Kipper leader.
  • It's unintuitive just how mad FPTP is. If you've got a party getting one vote in seven or one vote in eight nationwide, it just feels like they should be able to win seats somewhere, especially if their leader is running.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,534

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    UKIP's support is 5 times higher than in 2010.
  • The Tory candidate is a guy who made a principled and honourable decision to defect from UKIP to The Tories, in fact he's an ex Kipper leader.

    So, in what way is he not a pig-dog?
  • Sean_F said:

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    UKIP's support is 5 times higher than in 2010.
    But the crap campaigner point still stands.

    Look at his attendance in Thanet South in recent months.

    He doesn't want to do the hard work.

    It is possible whoever wins in Thanet South will gets around 32% of the vote, in that scenario every vote counts, and every time he fails to canvass, he's not picking up votes.
  • The Tory candidate is a guy who made a principled and honourable decision to defect from UKIP to The Tories, in fact he's an ex Kipper leader.

    So when a Kipper defects to the Tories it's a principled and honourable decision but when it's the other way round the person in question is a traitorous pigdog.

    I get it now.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    He is on QT tonight with 3 women and Russell Brand.

    Brave...
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.
  • The Tory candidate is a guy who made a principled and honourable decision to defect from UKIP to The Tories, in fact he's an ex Kipper leader.

    So, in what way is he not a pig-dog?
    He didn't time his defection to cause maximum damage to his former party.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.
  • The Tory candidate is a guy who made a principled and honourable decision to defect from UKIP to The Tories, in fact he's an ex Kipper leader.

    So, in what way is he not a pig-dog?
    He didn't time his defection to cause maximum damage to his former party.
    Fair enough.
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    Note the previous Thanet South poll conducted by Lord Ashcroft in July had UKIP ahead,so it was surprising to see Farage behind by 5 in this one. I'm sure he'll start campaigning in the constituency after Christmas.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited December 2014
    Is this from the Ashcroft Constituency Polls field work 23-24 Nov ?
  • Sporting continue to have Labour 5 seats ahead in terms of GE2015:

    Labour ................ 283 - 289
    Conservatives ..... 278 - 284

    Still no apparent boost for the Blues from the Autumn Statement.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    In Dover & Deal UKIP are 9/4 with Ladbrokes despite having taken 88.89% of the money. Tories 10/11. Odd
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    Sean_F said:


    Party leaders tend to get a boost where they stand.

    I think Mr Clegg might be an exception.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Sobering to think Labour were a decent second in this seat in 2010.
  • Sean_F said:


    Party leaders tend to get a boost where they stand.

    I think Mr Clegg might be an exception.
    Even the notorious Oakeshott poll's supplementaries showed Nick Clegg highly rated by the voters of Sheffield Hallam
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624
    TGOHF said:

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    He is on QT tonight with 3 women and Russell Brand.

    Brave...
    I shall be supporting Mr Farage against Mr Brand.

  • taffys said:

    Sobering to think Labour were a decent second in this seat in 2010.

    And held the seat between 1997 and 2010
  • Sean_F said:


    Party leaders tend to get a boost where they stand

    Didn't help Robinson in Belfast East in 2010.
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    Sean_F said:


    Party leaders tend to get a boost where they stand.

    I think Mr Clegg might be an exception.
    Even the notorious Oakeshott poll's supplementaries showed Nick Clegg highly rated by the voters of Sheffield Hallam
    He has a 3% (?) lead in the recent Ashcroft poll.

  • rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF said:

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    He is on QT tonight with 3 women and Russell Brand.

    Brave...
    I shall be supporting Mr Farage against Mr Brand.

    On the scifi theme, Farage v Brand is Alien vs Predator.

    Whoever wins, we lose.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    TGOHF said:

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    He is on QT tonight with 3 women and Russell Brand.

    Brave...
    You cant even get the day right!
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited December 2014
    Farage is 7/4 with bwin.. I am on.

    @Quincel provided the tip

    The latest Ashcroft poll showed UKIP improving their score on all counts in the raw data compared to the previous poll, but with a final score of 4-5% less thanks to DNV2010 allocations.

    Maybe that allocation is right, but I think that's why the price hasn't really dropped too much.. after Rochester and Clacton, the reliance on 2010s DNVs staying at home has emptied too many wallets (I think the bwin bet is just clueless odds compiling, they love a ricket)
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    edited December 2014
    Also from the ComRes/ITN poll

    It would be better to slow the rate of spending cuts even if it takes longer to get the country's finances back on track.
    Agree 52%
    Disagree 25%
    DK 22%


    Hodges is being misleading, 33% don't say they support cutting spending to 1930's levels, it's 33% think it will be good for them personally.
  • TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited December 2014
    So let me get this right, we are getting excited about a three week old poll which shows the difference between the first and second parties is almost MoE, and where UKIP comes out ahead unless you assign DKs to their 2010 Vote, in a constituency in which Farage, the party leader wasn't a candidate at the time, and in an election which UKIP hardly featured...
  • Good afternoon, everyone.

    Mr. Flashman (deceased), I'd like a poll phrasing the question as "Do you support Britain reducing its debt, closing the deficit and spending only the money the state accrues in taxation?" or similar.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    So if you equate "discrete" with "not ostentatious" then the public agree with Farage, surely some mistake ;-)
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

    There is still a majority that "The Government is cutting public spending too much and too quickly" and "It would be better to slow the rate of spending cuts even if it makes it take longer to get the country’s finances back on track".

    I believe gov't spending cuts are just over 2%, after 5 years of 'austerity'.
  • Indigo said:

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    So if you equate "discrete" with "not ostentatious" then the public agree with Farage, surely some mistake ;-)
    Not quite. Curiously another Dave has missed out some of the other findings from this poll
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    Have you ever seen someone breastfeeding ostentatiously?

    No: 60 million
    Yes: Nigel Farage
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,960
    edited December 2014
    Women should be allowed to Breast feed in public places like restaurants and cafes.

    Agree 67%

    Disagree 18%

    From the same comres poll
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    Indigo said:

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    So if you equate "discrete" with "not ostentatious" then the public agree with Farage, surely some mistake ;-)
    Not quite. Curiously another Dave has missed out some of the other findings from this poll
    Don't keep us in suspense.
  • Women should be allowed to Breast feed in public places like restaurants and cafes.

    Agree 67%

    Disagree 18%

    From the same comres poll

    Breast is best :)
  • FlightpathFlightpath Posts: 4,012
    edited December 2014

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    It is not of course proposed to cut spending to 1930 levels. Its possible that spending might be cut to to the %age of GDP last seen in 1930. Not the same thing.
    What might be true is that the govt are aiming for spending 6 times the level of the 1930's.
    And its all no doubt far too nuanced for a poll to remind people that for most of the period in question, capital spending by government, on roads, hospitals and schools and other infrastructure was a lot higher than it is now, gross investment reaching 10% or more of GDP at times in the 1960s and 1970s. Currently it is just over 3.5%.
    In a pre-privatization era, the nationalised industries swelled public sector investment.
  • When the inverse question is asked.

    Women NOT should be allowed to Breast feed in public places like restaurants and cafes.

    Agree 20%

    Disagree 65%
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    Women should be allowed to Breast feed in public places like restaurants and cafes.

    Agree 67%

    Disagree 18%

    From the same comres poll

    ? As I understand it Claridges wanted the lady to use a napkin to cover her chest, they didn't beat her with a broom.
  • So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624
    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?

    UKIP is on the side of the public by making a ridiculous contention: that there are millions of women ostentatiously breastfeeding in public.
  • FlightpathFlightpath Posts: 4,012
    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF said:

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    He is on QT tonight with 3 women and Russell Brand.

    Brave...
    I shall be supporting Mr Farage against Mr Brand.

    Personally I preferred Stalin to Hitler. It does not get us very far.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,326
    TGOHF said:

    Laura Sandys would have thrashed Farage next year though.

    As a Europhile she would have been trounced.
    In 2010 Farage finished third in a two horse race, beaten into second place by a Federalist who set up the Pro Euro Tory party.

    Farage is a crap campaigner.

    Punters beware.
    He is on QT tonight with 3 women and Russell Brand.

    Brave...
    Russell Effing Brand!?! There was a time when strange looking badly dressed men with unbrushed hair shouting obscenities and muttering incoherently in public were pitied, maybe given some money for a cup of tea and then ignored.

    If only......
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    Farage didn't say women shouldn't breast feed in public though.. so what on earth are you talking about?
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,534
    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?

    UKIP is on the side of the public by making a ridiculous contention: that there are millions of women ostentatiously breastfeeding in public.
    The women who organised a mass breastfeed outside Claridges were presumably being ostentatious. There wouldn't be any point otherwise.

  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    I believe gov't spending cuts are just over 2%, after 5 years of 'austerity'.

    Hard to believe that party of Denis Healey, the man that cut spending by 3.9% in real terms in one year, are complaining about this!


  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?
    In the case of Claridges, the lady posed for a photograph, and tweeted it.
  • isam said:

    So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    Farage didn't say women shouldn't breast feed in public though.. so what on earth are you talking about?
    I was satirising Socrates.
  • FlightpathFlightpath Posts: 4,012
    Artist said:

    Note the previous Thanet South poll conducted by Lord Ashcroft in July had UKIP ahead,so it was surprising to see Farage behind by 5 in this one. I'm sure he'll start campaigning in the constituency after Christmas.


    Hello Mr Artist. If Farage wins by one vote then the punters win and the odds are right.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    isam said:

    So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    Farage didn't say women shouldn't breast feed in public though.. so what on earth are you talking about?
    I was satirising Socrates.
    Oh ok went over my head
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,989


    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

    Perhaps you wouldn't consider me "intelligent" but I would be in the 26% camp. Reducing the deficit is important, no question, but the key is HOW we do it.

    Simply cutting spending (and there's a vindictive undercurrent about aspects of this which is far from pleasant) and only then in a few areas (excluding the NHS, education and defence seems foolish) only looks at half the problem.

    Conservatives only seem to want to talk about the spending but it's also about getting money in via tax receipts, asset sales and the like. The public finances truly went over the cliff when the income dried up in 2007-08. The collapse in income tax, corporation tax and VAT receipts threw the splurge in spending into sharp relief.

    The priority must be to get money in as much as it is to stop spending. Indeed, the more money Government receives, the more it can allocate to debt finance. The problem is even though the Coalition raised VAT, there's next to no mention of raising taxes but this is unavoidable.

    Whether we like it or not, taxes have to rise - that means both direct and indirect taxation. Nobody will say it because the debate on taxation has been locked down for two decades but raising basic rate tax to 25p for example would bring in much needed revenue as would further asset sales.

    Conservative policy, like the debate, is narrow and one-sided. Given the scale of the problem, we need to look at the other side of the fence.

  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Artist said:

    Note the previous Thanet South poll conducted by Lord Ashcroft in July had UKIP ahead,so it was surprising to see Farage behind by 5 in this one. I'm sure he'll start campaigning in the constituency after Christmas.


    Hello Mr Artist. If Farage wins by one vote then the punters win and the odds are right.
    Hard to get too excited when the margin of error is 3.8%

    As I mentioned below its almost meaningless assigning "Don't Know" to the 2010 Vote when it wasn't Farage and when UKIP were a non-factor in the election. Absent that adjustment, UKIP are in the lead in the poll.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,704
    edited December 2014
    Totally O/T, but has anyone else noticed that the BBC, in discussing the current weather conditions, almost never refers to “:Scotland” but to “the northern part of the UK!”

    Having discussed th effect on the NPotUK the reporter then went on the talk about events “South of the border!”

    I wonder what words would have been used in early September and before!
  • So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    What did Boris say?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,960
    edited December 2014

    So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    What did Boris say?
    He said, people who vote UKIP have sex with vacuum cleaners
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138
    Well said, Stodge.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Ladbrokes have done a buzzword bingo for Brand vs Farage

    I wouldn't be surprised if Brand went through the card, he only has soundbites in his locker.

    "Racist" "Scaremongering" "Romanians" "twitter" "Trumpton" "Breastfeeding" all look certs to me

    Farage must be odds on to say either "complete madness" or "utter lunacy", though I don't think he will be aggressive towards Brand. Brand will almost certainly be aggressive to Farage, especially if a couple of jokes fall flat.

    http://sportsbeta.ladbrokes.com/Question-Time-Specials/Buzzword-Bingo/Politics-N-1z0xtp9Z1z0xtp4Z1z141ng/
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    stodge said:


    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

    Perhaps you wouldn't consider me "intelligent" but I would be in the 26% camp. Reducing the deficit is important, no question, but the key is HOW we do it.

    Simply cutting spending (and there's a vindictive undercurrent about aspects of this which is far from pleasant) and only then in a few areas (excluding the NHS, education and defence seems foolish) only looks at half the problem.

    Conservatives only seem to want to talk about the spending but it's also about getting money in via tax receipts, asset sales and the like. The public finances truly went over the cliff when the income dried up in 2007-08. The collapse in income tax, corporation tax and VAT receipts threw the splurge in spending into sharp relief.

    The priority must be to get money in as much as it is to stop spending. Indeed, the more money Government receives, the more it can allocate to debt finance. The problem is even though the Coalition raised VAT, there's next to no mention of raising taxes but this is unavoidable.

    Whether we like it or not, taxes have to rise - that means both direct and indirect taxation. Nobody will say it because the debate on taxation has been locked down for two decades but raising basic rate tax to 25p for example would bring in much needed revenue as would further asset sales.

    Conservative policy, like the debate, is narrow and one-sided. Given the scale of the problem, we need to look at the other side of the fence.

    ? VAT is a tax.

  • TCPoliticalBettingTCPoliticalBetting Posts: 10,819
    edited December 2014

    So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    What did Boris say?
    He said, people who vote UKIP have sex with vacuum cleaners
    people who vote UKIP have sex with cleaners



    Just banter
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited December 2014
    Can't help noticing that the most positive people on the subject of the way the country are heading are those with private pensions.

    It's been very noticeable that the "greying" rather than grey vote has become a lot more amenable to the Tories in recent months. The 55-64 group.

    Osborne (and Webb's) pension reforms?
  • So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    What did Boris say?
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/boris-johnson-says-that-breastfeeding-mothers-should-be-discreet-9910491.html

    "Boris Johnson says that breastfeeding mothers should be 'discreet'"
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    Incidentally, just to ruminate on polls several months or more before an election generally. I dont understand why when people vote for say UKIP instead of the Tories, it is understood that voters are "sending a message" and that in most cases the Tories would expect to get the seat back at a General Election. At the same time we expect people to be telling the truth to pollsters, and not using them to "send a message". I would have thought that an opinion poll was the ideal vehicle to send a message to politicians, no risk at all of getting the wrong people elected.

    It would be very much in the interests of a eurosceptic member of public to state they would vote for UKIP to a pollster, in the hopes that if other people agreed, the government would be pushed towards a more eurosceptic position. In the same way a metropolitan Labour supporter beginning to feel let down might not seriously consider voting green at all, but there is nothing to lose by giving EdM the impression that his support it waning.
  • Incidentally, got two letters in the post from Ed Balls today. Seems a bit excessive. And overuse of 'our NHS' is bloody tedious.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624

    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?
    In the case of Claridges, the lady posed for a photograph, and tweeted it.
    Did the picture look like she was breastfeeding ostentatiously?

    I think not: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-30298382
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?

    UKIP is on the side of the public by making a ridiculous contention: that there are millions of women ostentatiously breastfeeding in public.
    Someone on here claimed they'd never seen someone breastfeeding in public. I'm pretty certain they will have just that they never realised that breastfeeding was taking place.

    It's not like a woman starts flashing her tits when she breastfeeds.

    For those who are unaware it basically looks like she is cuddling her baby.
  • So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    What did Boris say?
    He said, people who vote UKIP have sex with vacuum cleaners
    people who vote UKIP have sex with cleaners



    Just banter
    So if I started voting UKIP and I told my cleaner I wanted to see her spit and polish my valuables....
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,989

    ? VAT is a tax.

    Please try and understand this - it's not difficult.

    The Coalition raised VAT but didn't, for instance, raise the basic or higher rate of income tax. Indeed, the higher rate was cut in the Omnishambles Budget of 2012.

    Given the nature of the fiscal emergency, it seems curious that more widescale tax rises weren't implemented as a way of generating revenue and reducing the deficit. That's NOT to say spending cuts shouldn't be made and I part company with those who claim that the NHS, Education and even Defence are somehow "special cases" which should avoid any cuts at all.

    Fuel duty is a useful fundraiser for the Government and so is stamp duty. Gimmicks on the periphery of these are just that - a serious Chancellor committing to reducing the deficit wouldn't have been afraid to try to generate more revenue.

    The problem is Osborne is a political Chancellor - he's not serious about the deficit whatever his weasel words.

  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?
    In the case of Claridges, the lady posed for a photograph, and tweeted it.
    Did the picture look like she was breastfeeding ostentatiously?

    I think not: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-30298382
    If you pose for a photograph, you are clearly being 'ostentatious'.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ostentatious
  • HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    edited December 2014
    @Stoge

    I fully expect taxes to rise after the election whoever gets in. No party is going to campaign on the sort of increases necessary though.

    A basic rate of income tax of 25% would mean the average worker would be paying 37p per pound of taxable income to HMG. I doubt many people would vote for that.

    As for more asset sales, fine but they are of no use in cutting the deficit and would be a spit on the ocean when looking at total debt.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    The people least likely to think the google tax is a good idea are the young, the poor, the Welsh and the unemployed. Wow.

    So who is Ed actually talking to?
  • stodge said:


    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

    Perhaps you wouldn't consider me "intelligent" but I would be in the 26% camp. Reducing the deficit is important, no question, but the key is HOW we do it.

    Simply cutting spending (and there's a vindictive undercurrent about aspects of this which is far from pleasant) and only then in a few areas (excluding the NHS, education and defence seems foolish) only looks at half the problem.

    Conservatives only seem to want to talk about the spending but it's also about getting money in via tax receipts, asset sales and the like. The public finances truly went over the cliff when the income dried up in 2007-08. The collapse in income tax, corporation tax and VAT receipts threw the splurge in spending into sharp relief.

    The priority must be to get money in as much as it is to stop spending. Indeed, the more money Government receives, the more it can allocate to debt finance. The problem is even though the Coalition raised VAT, there's next to no mention of raising taxes but this is unavoidable.

    Whether we like it or not, taxes have to rise - that means both direct and indirect taxation. Nobody will say it because the debate on taxation has been locked down for two decades but raising basic rate tax to 25p for example would bring in much needed revenue as would further asset sales.

    Conservative policy, like the debate, is narrow and one-sided. Given the scale of the problem, we need to look at the other side of the fence.

    For me, living beyond our means, does not just mean our spending exceeds our income. It means there is an undermining fundamental problem that our spending exceeds any reasonable expectation of what our income should or could be. I think this applies not only to the UK but also to the rest of Europe.

    For this reason I certainly do not think that we should be looking at ways to perpetuate an unsustainable system by pumping yet more tax payers money into it. We need to radically rethink the whole provision of public services with a view to massive cuts and a wholesale change in our ideas about what the State should and should not be doing.

    Anyone who thinks we can just allow the State to continue to spend larger and larger proportions of GDP really isn't living in the real world.
  • On topic I really don't see Farage winning. He is too much of a Marmite man.
  • stodge said:


    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

    ..... Whether we like it or not, taxes have to rise - that means both direct and indirect taxation. Nobody will say it because the debate on taxation has been locked down for two decades but raising basic rate tax to 25p for example would bring in much needed revenue as would further asset sales.
    Conservative policy, like the debate, is narrow and one-sided. Given the scale of the problem, we need to look at the other side of the fence.
    The problem stodge is that the effect of tax increases tends to be highly elastic and subject to the law of diminishing returns. Tax the highest paid much more and they modify their arrangements, ultimately enough just move elsewhere and there is a drop in tax returns. Sales tax increases tend to be more inelastic but at our VAT level of 20% we are probably at/near/over the point of diminishing returns.
    It is notable that the top 1% of income earners pay over 30% of the income tax raised. That is a high level of re-distribution whilst not providing major incentives on them to modify their arrangements.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    I fully expect taxes to rise after the election whoever gets in, no party is going to campaign on the sort of increases necessary though.

    Petrol has to be a target. City AM today was talking about a quid a litre in a few months time. That won;t last, whoever gets in.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    stodge said:


    Whether we like it or not, taxes have to rise - that means both direct and indirect taxation. Nobody will say it because the debate on taxation has been locked down for two decades but raising basic rate tax to 25p for example would bring in much needed revenue as would further asset sales.

    Conservative policy, like the debate, is narrow and one-sided. Given the scale of the problem, we need to look at the other side of the fence.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve

    The problem is what can you tax without actually reducing your take. By any objective measure, the 50% top rate of tax took in less money than the current 45% rate, because higher taxes encourage more avoidance and more emigration - as Mr Healey found out in 1976.

    If you increase corporation tax companies start to move to countries with lower taxes like Ireland, or they start to shed jobs because they dont have so much spare money, which means you start paying more benefits for people rather than receiving their income tax.

    If you increase personal taxation, less gets spent in shops, lots of business struggle, pay less tax, shed staff etc. Also the most saleable, most mobile members of society tend to drift off to more welcoming counties. We are already losing the majority of our medical graduates to Australia, if we put up taxes more will go, similarly more of our best IT staff will go to the USA etc.

    There might be room to squeeze £1-2bn out of tax before it start to have negative effects on the economy, but really thats just a rounding error when we are talking about trying to close a £108bn spending gap.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    chestnut said:

    So who is Ed actually talking to?

    The Quiet Bat People
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624

    rcs1000 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?
    In the case of Claridges, the lady posed for a photograph, and tweeted it.
    Did the picture look like she was breastfeeding ostentatiously?

    I think not: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-30298382
    If you pose for a photograph, you are clearly being 'ostentatious'.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ostentatious
    If you had passed the woman on the left breastfeeding, would you have even noticed?
  • stodge said:


    Surely this is a case of most intelligent people recognising the inescapable truth that in this country we are living way, way beyond our means on borrowed money and that this simply cannot continue indefinitely.
    Government has to have the courage to grasp the nettle. To date, all this Government has done is to poke it with a stick. Still at least that's better than the previous lot who feed the nettle with copious quantities of fertilizer.

    Perhaps you wouldn't consider me "intelligent" but I would be in the 26% camp. Reducing the deficit is important, no question, but the key is HOW we do it.

    Simply cutting spending (and there's a vindictive undercurrent about aspects of this which is far from pleasant) and only then in a few areas (excluding the NHS, education and defence seems foolish) only looks at half the problem.

    Conservatives only seem to want to talk about the spending but it's also about getting money in via tax receipts, asset sales and the like. The public finances truly went over the cliff when the income dried up in 2007-08. The collapse in income tax, corporation tax and VAT receipts threw the splurge in spending into sharp relief.

    The priority must be to get money in as much as it is to stop spending. Indeed, the more money Government receives, the more it can allocate to debt finance. The problem is even though the Coalition raised VAT, there's next to no mention of raising taxes but this is unavoidable.

    Whether we like it or not, taxes have to rise - that means both direct and indirect taxation. Nobody will say it because the debate on taxation has been locked down for two decades but raising basic rate tax to 25p for example would bring in much needed revenue as would further asset sales.

    Conservative policy, like the debate, is narrow and one-sided. Given the scale of the problem, we need to look at the other side of the fence.

    .....Anyone who thinks we can just allow the State to continue to spend larger and larger proportions of GDP really isn't living in the real world.
    No they are thinking as a socialist in a world of globally connected capitalism. North Korea and Venezuela are suitable places for such thinking. Maybe Scotland as well?
  • Alistair said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?

    UKIP is on the side of the public by making a ridiculous contention: that there are millions of women ostentatiously breastfeeding in public.
    Someone on here claimed they'd never seen someone breastfeeding in public. I'm pretty certain they will have just that they never realised that breastfeeding was taking place.

    It's not like a woman starts flashing her tits when she breastfeeds.

    For those who are unaware it basically looks like she is cuddling her baby.
    This is what I didn't get about this whole argument. I am damn sure you will find there are women who have gone to functions at Claridges in low cut dresses that showed more breast than a woman feeding her baby.
  • TCPoliticalBettingTCPoliticalBetting Posts: 10,819
    edited December 2014

    So there we have it. Farage is not in touch with the British public.

    Once again the liberal metropolitan elite are more in touch with the public than Farage.

    What did Boris say?
    He said, people who vote UKIP have sex with vacuum cleaners
    people who vote UKIP have sex with cleaners



    Just banter
    So if I started voting UKIP and I told my cleaner I wanted to see her spit and polish my valuables....
    TSE this is where you should hire staff. NSFW
    http://www.nakedcleaners.co.uk/
  • Scott_P said:

    chestnut said:

    So who is Ed actually talking to?

    The Quiet Bat People
    The Quiet Bat People have spoken and they're turning up the volume?
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    stodge said:

    ? VAT is a tax.

    Please try and understand this - it's not difficult.

    The Coalition raised VAT but didn't, for instance, raise the basic or higher rate of income tax. Indeed, the higher rate was cut in the Omnishambles Budget of 2012.

    Given the nature of the fiscal emergency, it seems curious that more widescale tax rises weren't implemented as a way of generating revenue and reducing the deficit. That's NOT to say spending cuts shouldn't be made and I part company with those who claim that the NHS, Education and even Defence are somehow "special cases" which should avoid any cuts at all.

    Fuel duty is a useful fundraiser for the Government and so is stamp duty. Gimmicks on the periphery of these are just that - a serious Chancellor committing to reducing the deficit wouldn't have been afraid to try to generate more revenue.

    The problem is Osborne is a political Chancellor - he's not serious about the deficit whatever his weasel words.

    They used fiscal drag to increase the numbers paying higher rate income tax.

    and they did raise other taxes too.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/comment/11217375/Tax-rises-how-the-Coalition-spared-those-in-the-middle.html
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    The tax take is up 19% in four years, and is up £80bn per annum.

  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Alistair said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Socrates said:

    TGOHF said:

    Dan Hodges ‏@DPJHodges 24m24 minutes ago

    ComRes ITN poll that will terrify Labour. 33% support cutting spending to 1930's levels, 26% oppose. Lab praying it was the game changer.

    Also on the important mumsnet issue of the day:

    "Women should have to be discrete when breast feeding in public places such as restaurants and cafes" +56% / -30%

    http://comres.co.uk/poll/1346/itv-news-autumn-statement-poll.htm
    As the elite fails to recognise again and again, on the vast majority of issues, UKIP are at, or near, the centre of public opinion, while what the political class calls the "centre" is way out on left field.
    I'm sorry: no-one sensible disagrees with that contention.

    The real question is: has anyone seen anyone breastfeeding in public in a "non-discreet" manner?

    I have not. Can you genuinely recall a single occasion were you've seen a woman breastfeed in a "non-discreet" manner?

    UKIP is on the side of the public by making a ridiculous contention: that there are millions of women ostentatiously breastfeeding in public.
    Someone on here claimed they'd never seen someone breastfeeding in public. I'm pretty certain they will have just that they never realised that breastfeeding was taking place.

    It's not like a woman starts flashing her tits when she breastfeeds.

    For those who are unaware it basically looks like she is cuddling her baby.
    This is what I didn't get about this whole argument. I am damn sure you will find there are women who have gone to functions at Claridges in low cut dresses that showed more breast than a woman feeding her baby.
    I doubt that's the case actually. Claridges has a pretty strict dress code. And I guess the "showing" during breastfeeding is not during the feeding itself, but when you're getting ready/finishing up.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,989


    For me, living beyond our means, does not just mean our spending exceeds our income. It means there is an undermining fundamental problem that our spending exceeds any reasonable expectation of what our income should or could be. I think this applies not only to the UK but also to the rest of Europe.

    For this reason I certainly do not think that we should be looking at ways to perpetuate an unsustainable system by pumping yet more tax payers money into it. We need to radically rethink the whole provision of public services with a view to massive cuts and a wholesale change in our ideas about what the State should and should not be doing.

    Anyone who thinks we can just allow the State to continue to spend larger and larger proportions of GDP really isn't living in the real world.

    I'm open to any and all suggestions about a "new deal" in that regard but the fact remains we have a growing population of elderly and school-age children which need support and investment and for whatever reason the private sector isn't able or willing to meet the gap.

    In the short to medium term, the requitrement is to bring the budget into balance and that means raising more income AND cutting spending until the two meet somewhere.

    There are of course two options - one is to see the State withdraw from a range of activities (that needs to be defined). The other is to raise taxes to an amount which makes the current arrangements sustainable (that also needs to be defined).


  • Socrates is a closet Islamist who prefers women to "cover up".

    (only kidding Socrates!)
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,624

    This is what I didn't get about this whole argument. I am damn sure you will find there are women who have gone to functions at Claridges in low cut dresses that showed more breast than a woman feeding her baby.

    I think the point everyone is missing is Farage's completely correct assertion that any business should be able to choose who they serve. I am not compelled to offer my labour to - say - the BNP if they decide they need to hire a fund manager; why should Claridges not have the right to choose who they serve?

    Of course, it's probably very poor business sense for Claridges to discriminate against breastfeeding women, but there should be no bars on them doing so, beyond their own self interest.
  • IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited December 2014

    For this reason I certainly do not think that we should be looking at ways to perpetuate an unsustainable system by pumping yet more tax payers money into it. We need to radically rethink the whole provision of public services with a view to massive cuts and a wholesale change in our ideas about what the State should and should not be doing.

    Yes indeed. The UK's productivity is 30% below what it is here in Asia, in a global market our people are therefore worth 30% less money per unit worked. We are used to, and more to the point being promised by politicians, a standard of living that the work we do, won't buy.

    Sure we can dominate some niche markets with involve high end skills for a few more years, but it wont last, if you look at the global education league tables the top five are all Asian countries. The question British politicians continually dodge is "why should people bring their business to Britain", because the answer is the reasons are dwindling, and if we start putting up taxes, they will dwindle faster.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262

    Scott_P said:

    chestnut said:

    So who is Ed actually talking to?

    The Quiet Bat People
    The Quiet Bat People have spoken and they're turning up the volume?
    Presumably they communicate using ultrasound, so one wouldn't hear them anyway.
This discussion has been closed.