Bramhall South and Woodford on Stockport (Con Defence)
Result: Conservative 2,080 (53% +8%), Liberal Democrats 1,502 (38% +5%), Green 197 (5%, no candidate last time), Labour 132 (3% -6%)
Conservative HOLD with a majority of 468 (13%) on a swing of 1.5% from Lib Dem to Con
Comments
And just to be safe, your sons too.....
blimey, he's a bloody toff...! ;
FPT London, strictly speaking, it's London, the South, and East Anglia that subsidise the rest of the country (at least when the public finances are in balance). But, of course, there are great areas of poverty in London, the South, and East Anglia, and great areas of prosperity in the rest of the country.
Paradoxically, London's continued prosperity depends on the rest of England not voting the same way as London does.
To be fair, the Merck family probably do have a case about the US Congress expropriating their business and selling it to their mates at a knockdown price (probably in return for a backhander).
But they're still doing ok.
There's also the truth that the Conservatives have a lot of seats to defend in Kent from both UKIP and Labour so the resources of a by-election won't be available whereas UKIP have, by definition, fewer targets and may be able to field more resources.
I assume the CON price is still around 5/6 - I'd say short rnough. Populus today wasn't a good poll for the Conservatives with Labour still over 35.
It's those of a right-on, intellectual, Guardian-reading, wonkish, hoity-toity, champagne socialist, mwah-mwah, darling luvvie dear, elitist, culture-wanker persuasion who are the complete arseholes who hate the English, the British, our history, and our country and all it stands for.
Daily Telegraph
Ed Miliband has said that he feels a sense of "respect" whenever he sees a white van outside a house draped in England flags.
Say what?
I suppose its beyond the bounds of possibility to suggest that Reckless did what he did out of principle.
Please Labour, do not get rid of Ed. He's hilarious.
If there had been no by election, Reckless defected today, and an opinion poll put him 7 points clear I think he would be shorter than 7/4
Ed's the Tory dream candidate, Kinnock or Foot would be better for Labour.
I've seen your idea for a Newark meet, I'd be up for that.
....And that's it in a nutshell it is an obvious lie. Its a painfully excruciatingly blatant lie. The man is a complete tool.
I am - City crooks permitting - intending to be at DD's this evening. If OGH is there taking pictures he can photograph my shoes only, for the benefit of Beverley C, TSE and any other PB shoe fetishists.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/21/the-national-pro-independence-newspaper-launch-scotland?CMP=twt_gu
Edit: this too,
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/nov/21/bravo-newsquest-your-scottish-independence-paper-is-timely
Rochester and Strood was meant to be a firebreak; the barrier that prevented the flames of a vanishing poll lead and growing internal Labour dissent from enveloping Ed Miliband.
Last week was the Labour leader’s big fight-back speech, this week was meant to be about the Tory by-election defeat to Ukip and next week should have been David Cameron’s Götterdämmerung with new defections to Ukip and the emergence of a letter in the press, signed by dozens of Tory backbenchers, calling for a change in leader.
This was the optimistic scenario mapped out by Ed Miliband’s advisers. Three weeks that would shift the topic of political conversation from Labour turmoil to Tory troubles.
http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2014/11/21/ed-miliband-lost-more-than-a-by-election-last-night/
1. The Ashcroft poll overstated Reckless's winning margin yesterday, and had him losing in May.
2. 80% of by-election victories in the last 30 years have gone back to their previous party at the next general election; with victories as narrow as yesterday's, I would guess the number is 100%.
Personally, I think Reckless could well do it - but I would have the Tories as narrow favourites.
And I'm very happy with the bets I have with you and PtP re May :-)
As for Ed M, I am of course reminded that there are plenty on here who would ridicule or criticise ANY Labour leader and had pb existed in say 1996 I'm sure there would have been plenty of negative comment and vitriol about Blair.
Those who are not well disposed toward Labour can find something or something retweeted or misquoted to confirm their view. As for how he will perform in an election campaign when he has the opportunity to critique a Government performance which even its stuanchest supporters might argue is not without its flaws, that remains to be seen.
We also have in David Cameron an individual who we know can be brittle under pressure and has been known to throw a wobbly when faced with a line of questionning he doesn't like. He will face some searching and awkward questions about his Government's performance and I suspect some of his bonhomie may crack round the edges.
Bacon sandwich. Gareth. Ukip-Lite. 2p for the homeless. Fireworks Night plot. Dark forces re-launch. Klass War. VanGate. Where does it end?
I have no idea what Ed was thinking?
The top 10 news stories noticed - at no 5 Rochester (3.6%) and number 10 Ed Miliband's troubles (1.6%)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2-Yk3CCUAA8Jmd.jpg:large
http://order-order.com/2014/11/21/miliband-i-feel-respect-when-i-see-a-white-van/
Even Ali G can spot the fake.
The man can't do sincere - let alone authentic
The difference is small c conservatism, those respectable northern labour MPs that love their country are probably under the party gloss, old fashioned, socially conservative labour MPs. The Guardian reading social liberals described with such aplomb above are a different kettle of fish, most of those will be considering nicking a few quick from the poor box next time the national anthem is played because its less embarrassing for them.
On the day that should have been about UKIP increasing their numbers at Westminster, we have Labour party troubles front and centre of the political landscape. AGAIN.
Miliband talking about respect - more fuel for the fire
Thornberry favouriting tweets - more fuel for the fire
Powell's performance against Andrew Neill - more fuel for the fire
Today will be remembered for Labour's patronising behaviour towards the working class rather than Reckless returning to parliament.
Worst of all possible worlds for Team Ed
You know the schtick: not even on our list of target seats, big chunk of the old Medway Towns seat (held by Bob Marshall Andrews until 2010) given to Chatham next door, it's a UKIP-Tory fight etc etc
Well if Rochester* was such a no-hoper for Labour, why did Gordon Brown pick the seat to launch his general election campaign in 2010?
http://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/108717/mr_rochester.html
Hardly, Ed had an open goal with that by election. He has somehow changed the entire storyline to the issues facing Labour. The Tories have faded into the background. He continues to keep the story alive by going on record insincerely by paying respect to white vans up and down the nation. Will we now have a National white van day? Only white vans so not even inclusive or diverse?
Cameron must be both helpless with laughter and in complete disbelief at his good luck.
Note to Labour..... If you don't stop digging you can include white vans in Oz at this rate.
#SaveEd#WeloveEd
What has changed, and this is why the story is so important, is that the core constituency has started to notice, and it doesn't like it. Meanwhile, Nigel sparks up another Montecristo...
The Labour Party machine went into bully mode. And that is deeply unattractive.
It has been a very bad week for Team Miliband - very bad.
Ed Miliband 'feels respect' whenever he sees a white van. Perhaps he's confused it with a hearse.