politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Is Clegg set to announce his departure today?
It is worth checking out the next Lib Dem Leader/Lib Dem leader at the General Election markets Take the 6/1 and 12/1 on Vince Cable, Tim Farron and Danny Alexander
Jack Blanchard @Jack_Blanchard_ · 5 mins5 minutes ago Breaking. Paddy Power slash odds on Paddy Power getting a load of easy publicity from hungover political hacks in Glasgow
Alternatively: Jack Blanchard of the Daily Mirror tweets: Breaking. Paddy Power slash odds on Paddy Power getting a load of easy publicity from hungover political hacks in Glasgow
Jack Blanchard @Jack_Blanchard_ · 5 mins5 minutes ago Breaking. Paddy Power slash odds on Paddy Power getting a load of easy publicity from hungover political hacks in Glasgow
As a final point on this subject, I've never thought very much of Nick Clegg, but he has one opportunity to redeem himself in my eyes, which is to see his way to lead his party all the way to the next general election.
As a final point on this subject, I've never thought very much of Nick Clegg, but he has one opportunity to redeem himself in my eyes, which is to see his way to lead his party all the way to the next general election.
What he does after that, I'm less fussed about.
Thanks - that post has given me my biggest laugh of the morning.
I hope Dave, George, Ed and Ed remain similarly committed to their leadership tasks too.
I reckon he will announce his wife is expecting another child. What else could Wintour of Guardian mean by tweeting: "Reckon the Clegger has the best, if not the most political, announcement of the conference season in his speech tomorrow."
Vince Cable would be the obvious safe pair of hands though, surely?
Yes BUT most bookies will be betting on next permanent leader, and Cable is quite old so any coronation plus announcement he will stand down after GE2015, and you might or might not get paid.
I'd thought this would be bad for Ed and Labour but on reflection and if Tim Farron won I don't think it would be bad at all. If anyone can make Ed look like a heavyweight it's Tim Farron and a refreshed Lib Dem party attacking from the left can do nothing but good.
If there was LD leadership election before GE2015 then an existing minister would surely get it - thus screwing Farron
That doesn't follow. There would be great advantages in not having an existing minister as the new leader. Untainted. Fresh start. Not having to cooperate in the Cabinet. Gloves off.
I'd thought this would be bad for Ed and Labour but on reflection and if Tim Farron won I don't think it would be bad at all. If anyone can make Ed look like a heavyweight it's Tim Farron and a refreshed Lib Dem party attacking from the left can do nothing but good.
I don't understand, Roger. How does a LD party which is more attractive to left-leaning voters help Labour?
If there was LD leadership election before GE2015 then an existing minister would surely get it - thus screwing Farron
That doesn't follow. There would be great advantages in not having an existing minister as the new leader. Untainted. Fresh start. Not having to cooperate in the Cabinet. Gloves off.
Yep, and Farron's been positioning himself specifically for that scenario. To the disdain of some of his colleagues, no doubt, but they don't have a particularly privileged position in the leadership contest.
I'd thought this would be bad for Ed and Labour but on reflection and if Tim Farron won I don't think it would be bad at all. If anyone can make Ed look like a heavyweight it's Tim Farron and a refreshed Lib Dem party attacking from the left can do nothing but good.
I don't understand, Roger. How does a LD party which is more attractive to left-leaning voters help Labour?
If he goes he'll just be replaced by someone doing an "Ed Miliband", hinting at how much they opposed the previous (Blair/Brown) regime but when you check their voting record on Hansard they voted FOR everything they now say they were averse to.
(Not all that averse if you don't have the courage of your convictions to stand up and be counted) i.e: vote against them.
That you wanted to see your govt successfully implement these policies (as will be shown by your votes) then please (to the new leader of the Irrelevant Dems) don't come singing the same song as Miliband did. Pay heid to the evidence of why he's the least popular leader in Labour's chequered history.
I'd thought this would be bad for Ed and Labour but on reflection and if Tim Farron won I don't think it would be bad at all. If anyone can make Ed look like a heavyweight it's Tim Farron and a refreshed Lib Dem party attacking from the left can do nothing but good.
I don't understand, Roger. How does a LD party which is more attractive to left-leaning voters help Labour?
Because everyone will be attacking the Tories which will make Labour's supporters more likely to get out and vote.
The last thing Labour want is anyone talking about their record from last time or their manifesto this time.
Charlotte Henry @charlotteahenry · 3 mins3 minutes ago One senior Lib Dem tells me that if Clegg quits today “he will be the first person to fall over with apoplexy” It’s not happening.
@jimwaterson: Conference season: Labour weirdly pessimistic, Tories weirdly confident, UKIP manic, Lib Dems just totally content and planning for govt.
I'd thought this would be bad for Ed and Labour but on reflection and if Tim Farron won I don't think it would be bad at all. If anyone can make Ed look like a heavyweight it's Tim Farron and a refreshed Lib Dem party attacking from the left can do nothing but good.
I don't understand, Roger. How does a LD party which is more attractive to left-leaning voters help Labour?
Because everyone will be attacking the Tories which will make Labour's supporters more likely to get out and vote.
The last thing Labour want is anyone talking about their record from last time or their manifesto this time.
Everyone's attacking the Tories already. Doesn't seem to be hurting that much.
This is all just a ruse to make us all watch his speech isn't it?
If he's determined to stay, I can't believe they'd want speculation like this. It puts ideas in peoples' minds. I'm not really interested in people slashing odds. Far more interesting would be to see odds on him staying LENGTHENING.
This is all just a ruse to make us all watch his speech isn't it?
If he's determined to stay, I can't believe they'd want speculation like this. It puts ideas in peoples' minds. I'm not really interested in people slashing odds. Far more interesting would be to see odds on him staying LENGTHENING.
You can't get 1-3 on him to stay now or 5-6 for him not to announce his resignation now.
They have lengthened. Though shorter than 6:30 am...
I'd thought this would be bad for Ed and Labour but on reflection and if Tim Farron won I don't think it would be bad at all. If anyone can make Ed look like a heavyweight it's Tim Farron and a refreshed Lib Dem party attacking from the left can do nothing but good.
I don't understand, Roger. How does a LD party which is more attractive to left-leaning voters help Labour?
Because everyone will be attacking the Tories which will make Labour's supporters more likely to get out and vote.
The last thing Labour want is anyone talking about their record from last time or their manifesto this time.
Everyone's attacking the Tories already. Doesn't seem to be hurting that much.
There's a small chance that the Lib Dems will campaign on their record in helping clear up the mess left by Labour by being half sensible with spending.
Of course they might just start booing the Tories like they usually do which would be entirely against their own interests.
Also bear in mind the people most likely to vote on the strength of the simplistic "baby eating Tory" meme are Labour supporters.
If he goes he'll just be replaced by someone doing an "Ed Miliband", hinting at how much they opposed the previous (Blair/Brown) regime but when you check their voting record on Hansard they voted FOR everything they now say they were averse to.
(Not all that averse if you don't have the courage of your convictions to stand up and be counted) i.e: vote against them.
That you wanted to see your govt successfully implement these policies (as will be shown by your votes) then please (to the new leader of the Irrelevant Dems) don't come singing the same song as Miliband did. Pay heid to the evidence of why he's the least popular leader in Labour's chequered history.
Ministers tend not to vote against their own governments if they want to remain ministers: collective responsibility and all that.
@jimwaterson: Conference season: Labour weirdly pessimistic, Tories weirdly confident, UKIP manic, Lib Dems just totally content and planning for govt.
How can a Lib Dem party attacking from the left help Labour.
We're talking an energetic new left leaning Party dishing the dirt on their ex partners. Anything that damages the Tories disproportionately helps Labour as the left's market leader.
How can a Lib Dem party attacking from the left help Labour.
We're talking an energetic new left leaning Party dishing the dirt on their ex partners. Anything that damages the Tories disproportionately helps Labour as the left's market leader.
Can't see that myself. Or at least not a net positive for Labour - at a stretch, we might end up with LD +5 Con -2 Lab -3. But -1/-4 seems a more likely split in the case of any LD revival.
Clegg is now 1/4 to be the Lib Dem leader at the general election (at 6.30 am he was 1/16)
I know I'm tempting fate, but that's value IMHO.
Well, it won't be there by 2:30pm IMHO.
I'm on this again. I've taken the view from some time ago that Nick Clegg would see it out, and today's scare seems to have been entirely driven by Mr Power.
If there's a devolution announcement, as I said earlier, I reckon a Cornish Assembly to try and kill an English Parliament off forever (by carving England up into shitty little regions) and some city-regions will be what they go for.
How can a Lib Dem party attacking from the left help Labour.
We're talking an energetic new left leaning Party dishing the dirt on their ex partners. Anything that damages the Tories disproportionately helps Labour as the left's market leader.
Sorry Roger, but if the lib dems gain support from their current low base, they have to take it off labour, as that is who labour have taken it off them. Labour lose out.
How can a Lib Dem party attacking from the left help Labour.
We're talking an energetic new left leaning Party dishing the dirt on their ex partners. Anything that damages the Tories disproportionately helps Labour as the left's market leader.
Sorry Roger, but if the lib dems gain support from their current low base, they have to take it off labour, as that is who labour have taken it off them. Labour lose out.
In the latest Ashcroft national poll, the Liberal Democrat 2010 vote breaks down in this way:
Con 14% Lab 19% LD 24% UKIP 13% Green 11% Ref/DK 13%
A Lib Dem revival doesn't necessarily hurt Labour, it all depends on the details.
Comments
Jack Blanchard @Jack_Blanchard_ · 5 mins5 minutes ago
Breaking. Paddy Power slash odds on Paddy Power getting a load of easy publicity from hungover political hacks in Glasgow
No @ 1-2
Yes @ 6-4
WILL NICK CLEGG LEAD LIB DEMS INTO NEXT GENERAL ELECTION?
Singles Only. Applies to the party's leader on the date of the next general election.
Yes 1/5
No 3/1
@Antifrank out the woods ?
http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/uk-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=1928676
That was easy money
Mike on holiday. Check.
Mike betting on Clegg quitting. Check.
It is happening.
How much of this has been driven by Dan Hodges' article and a runaway rumour mill? All of it?
What he does after that, I'm less fussed about.
Whether he's going or not Clegg has found a way of generating lots of interest in his speech
Mike Smithson @MSmithsonPB
If there was LD leadership election before GE2015 then an existing minister would surely get it - thus screwing Farron
Is there a way to change it back to the old site format?
Couldn't believe it when I saw they were offering both sides!!
Didn't back it though, cant get on w Paddy
The LibDems need a fresh face for a fresh start.
I hope Dave, George, Ed and Ed remain similarly committed to their leadership tasks too.
Ed Davey? Steve Webb? Jo Swinson (long shot)
Presume Vince is now old news.
Vince Cable would be the obvious safe pair of hands though, surely?
Labour's firewall should take a battering.
Did you mean 16/1 rather than 1/16 but now think it was prophetic?
(Not all that averse if you don't have the courage of your convictions to stand up and be counted) i.e: vote against them.
That you wanted to see your govt successfully implement these policies (as will be shown by your votes) then please (to the new leader of the Irrelevant Dems) don't come singing the same song as Miliband did. Pay heid to the evidence of why he's the least popular leader in Labour's chequered history.
The last thing Labour want is anyone talking about their record from last time or their manifesto this time.
Charlotte Henry @charlotteahenry · 3 mins3 minutes ago
One senior Lib Dem tells me that if Clegg quits today “he will be the first person to fall over with apoplexy” It’s not happening.
I certainly would.
They have lengthened. Though shorter than 6:30 am...
Of course they might just start booing the Tories like they usually do which would be entirely against their own interests.
Also bear in mind the people most likely to vote on the strength of the simplistic "baby eating Tory" meme are Labour supporters.
How can a Lib Dem party attacking from the left help Labour.
We're talking an energetic new left leaning Party dishing the dirt on their ex partners. Anything that damages the Tories disproportionately helps Labour as the left's market leader.
I know I'm tempting fate, but that's value IMHO.
Still available at 2.18 to win
Has to be great value they should get in the region of 330
http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/uk-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=1298093
Never get on that. You may destroy the political fabric of this country if you did.
West Indies
3.209 £82.00 profit available £181.10
Con 14%
Lab 19%
LD 24%
UKIP 13%
Green 11%
Ref/DK 13%
A Lib Dem revival doesn't necessarily hurt Labour, it all depends on the details.