politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Labour MPs urge Alan Johnson to challenge for leader
Labour MPs in despair at Ed Miliband’s weak leadership are planning renewed efforts to tempt Alan Johnson into challenging for leader before the election.
I thought Sadiq Khan was favourite? Of course, Johnson could still be value, even if he isn't odds-on.
He's very likeable, but completely screwed up the GP negotiation and is out of his depth on the economy. Labour have been led by Miliband for 3-4 years and it's not like people haven't suggested he's rubbish during that period.
As per Brown, they're only harming themselves by bitching uselessly instead of uniting behind their leader or just axing him.
This is a bit rubbish. No viable alternative candidate, and the Telegraph manages to name a full two people complaining, Prescott saying they're not being bold enough, and a donor who would presumably have to pay the mansion tax and thinks they're being too bold. Then there's an anonymous "former minister", demonstrating that they couldn't even rustle up an anonymous senior former minister.
Had a quick peak at the Populus cross tabs - Interesting to note the regional difference in "Absolutely Certain to Vote" figure between SCotland and the rest of the UK.
Has that been replicated across other pollsters? And how much do we think this will fade as we get closer to the election?
Maybe they've learned their lesson from last time? Maybe Miliband just isn't feared the same way Brown was? Maybe given most Labour MPs didn't vote for him, they don't feel bound by him?
I agree, it's very unlikely. But not totally beyond the realms of possibility.
Mind you, the very fact that such talk is being reported at all is itself a very significant pointer to what is likely to happen over the next couple of years.
Unfortunately if they tried that now then spoiler candidates who change their name to the same as their opponents would be seen in every marginal seat in the country.
I thought David Lammy was a good potential - even with his oddly bi-polar IQ that appears to be very clever one minute, and a general knowledge dunce the next.
I thought Sadiq Khan was favourite? Of course, Johnson could still be value, even if he isn't odds-on.
He's very likeable, but completely screwed up the GP negotiation and is out of his depth on the economy. Labour have been led by Miliband for 3-4 years and it's not like people haven't suggested he's rubbish during that period.
As per Brown, they're only harming themselves by bitching uselessly instead of uniting behind their leader or just axing him.
I don't think Alan Johnson will take the leadership, he lacks at least one crucial quality, that of timing. A yougov poll shows the Tories slightly ahead and bang Alan Johnson wants to challenge for the leadership the very next day. What happens if yougov made an outlier? He could have waited a few days to see the clear picture, but no he had to make a rushed half baked move.
Today is Monday and as I said by tonight we will know if yougov had an outlier. But Alan Johnson doesn't seem to have patience.
Hope everyone is enjoying the latest party conference!
I've had a look at seats the Lib Dems are defending to see how many more seats they would hold onto, relative to UNS, for different levels of incumbency bonus. Obviously there are caveats, including that:
-The results are based on a UNS (apart from the incumbency effect, obviously) whereas in reality swings in contests involving Lib Dems can be are highly variable. -The incumbency bonus is assumed to be equal for all Lib Dem incumbents
To cut to the chase, and bearing in mind all the caveats noted above and in the post, the analysis suggests that an incumbency effect of around 6 points would likely be needed to save more than ten seats relative to a uniform national swing. On current polling, this points to a seat total somewhere in the 20s. But I'll avoid making formal seat projections for the time being.
Miss Plato, I have similar views about Lammy. Much sounder than Sadiq Khan, who (unless he's altered his policy) wants legislation to legalise discriminating against white people by having quotas for other ethnic groups.
Ed is safe because there is absolutely no one else who you can imagine doing a good job.
You could say Jim Murphy looked like he had more than two brain cells to rub together, but he's Scottish and they are going to get devomax at some point in the next year or so.
The fact that Alan Johnson is being mentioned shows the lack of viable alternatives at the top of the Labour party.
Miss Plato, I have similar views about Lammy. Much sounder than Sadiq Khan, who (unless he's altered his policy) wants legislation to legalise discriminating against white people by having quotas for other ethnic groups.
The only thing going for Khan in London is the Tower Hamlets factor. That enough subcontinent people will vote for him purely because of his ethnicity and not his merits.
It's pure hearsay of course but I have heard it said that there are minor background problems which would make it completely impossible for him to become leader. If that were the case, and he is aware of them, then the 'I'm not good enough line' is a decent cover story.
It's pure hearsay of course but I have heard it said that there are minor background problems which would make it completely impossible for him to become leader. If that were the case, and he is aware of them, then the 'I'm not good enough line' is a decent cover story.
Off topic:
I bought a companion rabbit for our remaining Doe yesterday, one of them will have to be neutered eventually though.
Well it's clear they [lucifer & prometheus] both had their roots in the same source beliefs.
But the difference was that while Lucifer got up and raged against God and publicly tried to encourage defecters, Prometheus snuck into Olympus one night and pinched some of the best goodies before handing them out willy-nilly with no thought given to the long-term consequences.
Miss Plato, I have similar views about Lammy. Much sounder than Sadiq Khan, who (unless he's altered his policy) wants legislation to legalise discriminating against white people by having quotas for other ethnic groups.
The only thing going for Khan in London is the Tower Hamlets factor. That enough subcontinent people will vote for him purely because of his ethnicity and not his merits.
Well his merits are actually pretty strong, but yes, there are areas where he could be expected to win about 120% of the votes.
One way for Turkey to manage their Kurdish Problem. What a bastard President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has turned out to be. Not a move against IS in Kobane.
OT I always wondered what the history was to the phrase "You are X, and I claim my £5", and after using it on a US website and met with ?? I looked it up on Wiki.
After discussing Party conferences and seasides - it seemed in keeping.
Lobby Lud is a fictional character invented in August 1927 by the Westminster Gazette, a British newspaper, now defunct. The name derives from the paper's telegraphic address, "Lobby, Ludgate". Anonymous employees of the newspaper visited seaside resorts. The paper printed details of the town, a description of that day's Lobby Lud and a pass phrase. Anyone carrying the newspaper could challenge Lobby Lud with the phrase and receive five pounds (about £260.00 in 2014).[1][2] People on holiday were known to be less likely to buy a newspaper. Some towns and large factories had holiday fortnights (called "wakes weeks" in the north of England); the town or works would all decamp at the same time. Circulation could drop considerably in the summer and proprietors hoped prizes would increase it.
It's pure hearsay of course but I have heard it said that there are minor background problems which would make it completely impossible for him to become leader. If that were the case, and he is aware of them, then the 'I'm not good enough line' is a decent cover story.
Off topic:
I bought a companion rabbit for our remaining Doe yesterday, one of them will have to be neutered eventually though.
It's pure hearsay of course but I have heard it said that there are minor background problems which would make it completely impossible for him to become leader. If that were the case, and he is aware of them, then the 'I'm not good enough line' is a decent cover story.
Off topic:
I bought a companion rabbit for our remaining Doe yesterday, one of them will have to be neutered eventually though.
Well it's clear they [lucifer & prometheus] both had their roots in the same source beliefs.
But the difference was that while Lucifer got up and raged against God and publicly tried to encourage defecters, Prometheus snuck into Olympus one night and pinched some of the best goodies before handing them out willy-nilly with no thought given to the long-term consequences.
Miss Plato, I have similar views about Lammy. Much sounder than Sadiq Khan, who (unless he's altered his policy) wants legislation to legalise discriminating against white people by having quotas for other ethnic groups.
The only thing going for Khan in London is the Tower Hamlets factor. That enough subcontinent people will vote for him purely because of his ethnicity and not his merits.
Well his merits are actually pretty strong, but yes, there are areas where he could be expected to win about 120% of the votes.
Tories are getting more and more desperate.DT hyperbole gives it away,"a cohort" of Labour MPs.A cohort consisted of approximately 480 men and commanded by one man.
It's pure hearsay of course but I have heard it said that there are minor background problems which would make it completely impossible for him to become leader. If that were the case, and he is aware of them, then the 'I'm not good enough line' is a decent cover story.
Off topic:
I bought a companion rabbit for our remaining Doe yesterday, one of them will have to be neutered eventually though.
Just make sure you haven't made the same mistake that South Korean zoo did...
Well it's clear they [lucifer & prometheus] both had their roots in the same source beliefs.
But the difference was that while Lucifer got up and raged against God and publicly tried to encourage defecters, Prometheus snuck into Olympus one night and pinched some of the best goodies before handing them out willy-nilly with no thought given to the long-term consequences.
Is there some long running history between Paddy Ashdown and Andrew Neil?
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
Unfortunately if they tried that now then spoiler candidates who change their name to the same as their opponents would be seen in every marginal seat in the country.
I recall there was a Welsh election where all three candidates were called Jones? I think that was one of the reasons for the change.
An exercise in peeing in his pants. Gives a warm feeling at the time followed shortly by embarrassment and a further drop in support. Also leaves a nasty smell to potential partners.
I have to say, ineffectual mutterings about replacing your leader is just about the worst backdrop to the start of the Labour Party's general election campaign.
Tories are getting more and more desperate.DT hyperbole gives it away,"a cohort" of Labour MPs.A cohort consisted of approximately 480 men and commanded by one man.
OT I always wondered what the history was to the phrase "You are X, and I claim my £5", and after using it on a US website and met with ?? I looked it up on Wiki.
After discussing Party conferences and seasides - it seemed in keeping.
Lobby Lud is a fictional character invented in August 1927 by the Westminster Gazette, a British newspaper, now defunct. The name derives from the paper's telegraphic address, "Lobby, Ludgate". Anonymous employees of the newspaper visited seaside resorts. The paper printed details of the town, a description of that day's Lobby Lud and a pass phrase. Anyone carrying the newspaper could challenge Lobby Lud with the phrase and receive five pounds (about £260.00 in 2014).[1][2] People on holiday were known to be less likely to buy a newspaper. Some towns and large factories had holiday fortnights (called "wakes weeks" in the north of England); the town or works would all decamp at the same time. Circulation could drop considerably in the summer and proprietors hoped prizes would increase it.
Older pbers may remember similar promotions, and it is, of course, how Brighton Rock starts, with the newspaperman's murder.
Tories are getting more and more desperate.DT hyperbole gives it away,"a cohort" of Labour MPs.A cohort consisted of approximately 480 men and commanded by one man.
You have to love the sheer desperation of the rightwing press (RWP).
This Telegraph piece and the Sunday Times one yesterday attempting to sow seeds of unrest within Labour.
Yet, er, the Tories are two MPs down!
Potentially about to lose the resulting 2 by elections on the spin (although I still fancy the Tories to hold in R&S despite Survation)! Hell maybe about to break loose, but it is the Tories who are in the path of the developing storm.
It's pure hearsay of course but I have heard it said that there are minor background problems which would make it completely impossible for him to become leader. If that were the case, and he is aware of them, then the 'I'm not good enough line' is a decent cover story.
Off topic:
I bought a companion rabbit for our remaining Doe yesterday, one of them will have to be neutered eventually though.
Just make sure you haven't made the same mistake that South Korean zoo did...
I'm missing something here. Is there some Gordon Broonesque rocking horse / nappy rumour about Postman Al?
The current issue of Viz features a Roger Mellie idea for a new TV programme called "What's My Rumour?" where contestants have to guess what is the rumour circulating on the internet about celebrity guests.
A la Dijonnaise, served with a stout Burgundy such as a Gevrey-Chambertin, is best, I think.
Once in my working life I walked passed a junior employee being comforted by her manager. The girl was worried about her cat, which was sick. "Don't worry", said her kindly manager. "Animals are tough!". "Only" I commented "if they're not cooked properly!"
Took me quite a long time to become well thought of again, certainly by the younger female members of staff!
Well it's clear they [lucifer & prometheus] both had their roots in the same source beliefs.
But the difference was that while Lucifer got up and raged against God and publicly tried to encourage defecters, Prometheus snuck into Olympus one night and pinched some of the best goodies before handing them out willy-nilly with no thought given to the long-term consequences.
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
I was chatting to a very warm and fuzzy chappy last week and he mentioned how much he liked fly-fishing. I said I had no idea that fish screamed and couldn't imagine that. He replied "Not if you hit them hard enough!"
I was quite taken aback - then laughed out loud. I'll look at him in a whole new light from now on!
A la Dijonnaise, served with a stout Burgundy such as a Gevrey-Chambertin, is best, I think.
Once in my working life I walked passed a junior employee being comforted by her manager. The girl was worried about her cat, which was sick. "Don't worry", said her kindly manager. "Animals are tough!". "Only" I commented "if they're not cooked properly!"
Took me quite a long time to become well thought of again, certainly by the younger female members of staff!
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
Lord Ashcroft@LordAshcroft·25 mins25 minutes ago This week's Ashcroft National Poll, plus Heywood & Middleton by-election poll, all on @ConHome today at 4pm.
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
He was probably getting his retaliation in first. I cant understand how people can bear to watch Neil interview people.
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
He was probably getting his retaliation in first. I cant understand how people can bear to watch Neil interview people.
Although I don't know if I'd like his policies (in his brief time as shadow chancellor, he was prattling on about being an "instinctive spending-cutter"), Alan Johnson would be a good choice for leader I think. People can call it shallow all they want, but politicians at the moment need to speak in something close to plain English, rather than the thinktank-ese that Miliband and most of the shadow cabinet speak in.
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
He was probably getting his retaliation in first. I cant understand how people can bear to watch Neil interview people.
It's the name isn't it?
If he was a poster on pbc he'd be Pork - chortling away to himself about how incompetent everyone else is.
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
He was probably getting his retaliation in first. I cant understand how people can bear to watch Neil interview people.
It's the name isn't it?
If he was a poster on pbc he'd be Pork - chortling away to himself about how incompetent everyone else is.
Ouch.
Personally I just like interviewers who are functionally numerate. It is so rare. Neil and Evan Davis and then I have to think for a bit. Maybe it is that ability to count that makes them feel so superior in the media world?
@SeanT Time for you to lead an elite team of volunteer thriller writers into the jaws of hell in an attempt to rescue western civilization Sean. Or you can stay at home, drink your wine, and let every other poor sod do the fighting for you.
@SeanT Time for you to lead an elite team of volunteer thriller writers into the jaws of hell in an attempt to rescue western civilization Sean. Or you can stay at home, drink your wine, and let every other poor sod do the fighting for you.
Apparently, SeanT's books are banned in areas under ISIS control, so he's not exactly impartial.
@rcs1000 "SeanT's books are banned in areas under ISIS control" They might be brutal and sadistic....but at least they have good taste in literature? :-)
Once more I post and no one is taking the blind bit of notice, especially on PB.
One way for Turkey to manage their Kurdish Problem. What a bastard President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has turned out to be. Not a move against IS in Kobane.
#Kurdish fighter who appeared on a BBC report in Sept, shot herself to avoid #ISIS capture during fighting. #Kobane pic.twitter.com/JMEXd1vvMe
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
A Labour party led by James Parnell would be out of sight by now. But he probably made the right call that it was never going to happen.
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
He was probably getting his retaliation in first. I cant understand how people can bear to watch Neil interview people.
It's the name isn't it?
If he was a poster on pbc he'd be Pork - chortling away to himself about how incompetent everyone else is.
Ouch.
Personally I just like interviewers who are functionally numerate. It is so rare. Neil and Evan Davis and then I have to think for a bit. Maybe it is that ability to count that makes them feel so superior in the media world?
Neil is also willing to question from the Right, as well as the Left. This makes him fairly unique amongst political journalists.
For example, he challenged Hague on not meeting the immigration target at Conservative conference. He asked why the target hadn't been met and why people shouldn't vote UKIP given that failure; what was Hague going to do about it, to meet the pledge?
One gets the impression that had it been Naughtie, Mair or Snow they might have quoted someone in the Tory party who had reservations (e.g. Mark Field) and instead asked him why he didn't just abandon the target given it had failed.
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
A Labour party led by James Parnell would be out of sight by now. But he probably made the right call that it was never going to happen.
@rcs1000 "SeanT's books are banned in areas under ISIS control" They might be brutal and sadistic....but at least they have good taste in literature? :-)
I can understand why Turkey thinks it is a great idea for the Peshmerga to be ground down somewhat, not least when people they thought were friends are insisting on giving them armaments that could give the Turkish army a problem in due course but basically only Turkey or Iran have the power to end ISIL locally.
There will come a point when it is in one or other of their interests to do so but at the moment their relative strength vis a vis their neighbours is simply being increased. The idea that token flights with strict instructions not to risk the lives of a civilian are going to make any difference are strictly for the fantasists amongst us.
Meanwhile the performance of that incredibly expensively created and trained Iraqi army is nothing short of completely embarrassing. Embarrassing for themselves and for the many units who claimed they had done good work training them.
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
He was probably getting his retaliation in first. I cant understand how people can bear to watch Neil interview people.
It's the name isn't it?
If he was a poster on pbc he'd be Pork - chortling away to himself about how incompetent everyone else is.
Ouch.
Personally I just like interviewers who are functionally numerate. It is so rare. Neil and Evan Davis and then I have to think for a bit. Maybe it is that ability to count that makes them feel so superior in the media world?
Neil is also willing to question from the Right, as well as the Left. This makes him fairly unique amongst political journalists.
For example, he challenged Hague on not meeting the immigration target at Conservative conference. He asked why the target hadn't been met and why people shouldn't vote UKIP given that failure; what was Hague going to do about it, to meet the pledge?
One gets the impression that had it been Naughtie, Mair or Snow they might have quoted someone in the Tory party who had reservations (e.g. Mark Field) and instead asked him why he didn't just abandon the target given it had failed.
Agreed. Neil is well prepared and gives them all a challenge. Evan Davis is unfortunately not as good, but we wait to see how he develops on Newsnight.
Note the (deserved) ratings for Steve Webb. 20/1 widely available on him being the next Lib Dem leader. It's a mystery to me why the party doesn't make more of an undoubted asset.
Who is left in Kobane now? From a tactical point of view all they have done is to concentrate some of their most committed fighters into one area, and supplies could rapidly become a problem if Turkey does decide to step in. (I assume here that anyone with any sense of self preservation has got the hell out of town)
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
A Labour party led by James Parnell would be out of sight by now. But he probably made the right call that it was never going to happen.
But what do you make of James Purnell David?
I think it is worth remembering that he only had relatively modest jobs albeit he received rapid promotions to cabinet. He was involved in more than his fair share of controversy, not least in relation to expenses and CGT. It would be foolish to project Blairite ideals onto him in a way that might never have happened. The most impressive thing about his Parliamentary career was his resignation and, on one view, even that proved to be a miscalculation.
All that said I think the Labour party is desperately short of people with his level of competence and decision making skills. He would almost certainly have kept the Labour party in a position closer to that maintained by Blair and he would not have shied away from necessary modernisation of public services in fear of upsetting the Unions. I think he would have been a much more difficult person for the Tories to challenge than Ed is. But then there are a lot of people who fall within that definition.
He was my boss at DWP for a bit. A nice and very ambitious/smart guy. He was the wrong sort of Labourite at the time. And wisely resigned. That caused quite a splash. IIRC he did it just as the 10pm news was starting.
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
A Labour party led by James Parnell would be out of sight by now. But he probably made the right call that it was never going to happen.
But what do you make of James Purnell David?
I think it is worth remembering that he only had relatively modest jobs albeit he received rapid promotions to cabinet. He was involved in more than his fair share of controversy, not least in relation to expenses and CGT. It would be foolish to project Blairite ideals onto him in a way that might never have happened. The most impressive thing about his Parliamentary career was his resignation and, on one view, even that proved to be a miscalculation.
All that said I think the Labour party is desperately short of people with his level of competence and decision making skills. He would almost certainly have kept the Labour party in a position closer to that maintained by Blair and he would not have shied away from necessary modernisation of public services in fear of upsetting the Unions. I think he would have been a much more difficult person for the Tories to challenge than Ed is. But then there are a lot of people who fall within that definition.
Who is left in Kobane now? From a tactical point of view all they have done is to concentrate some of their most committed fighters into one area, and supplies could rapidly become a problem if Turkey does decide to step in. (I assume here that anyone with any sense of self preservation has got the hell out of town)
I'm not sure it's that easy to 'get the hell out of town'. You have people who are infirm, others who want to stay and help, and many who don't want to leave their lifetime home. Others will need transport, but not be able to get it, whilst others will fear the unknown of where they will be going, and the journey itself.
Then there will be a few who think IS won't be as bad as they're painted and want to risk it.
It's easy to imagine circumstances where an elderly couple do not want to leave the home they've lived in for decades, their daughter doesn't want to leave them, her husband does not want to leave her, and they can't send their kids alone. So they all stay.
I hope to God known of us ever have to make such decisions ...
Who is left in Kobane now? From a tactical point of view all they have done is to concentrate some of their most committed fighters into one area, and supplies could rapidly become a problem if Turkey does decide to step in. (I assume here that anyone with any sense of self preservation has got the hell out of town)
I'm not sure it's that easy to 'get the hell out of town'. You have people who are infirm, others who want to stay and help, and many who don't want to leave their lifetime home. Others will need transport, but not be able to get it, whilst others will fear the unknown of where they will be going, and the journey itself.
Then there will be a few who think IS won't be as bad as they're painted and want to risk it.
It's easy to imagine circumstances where an elderly couple do not want to leave the home they've lived in for decades, their daughter doesn't want to leave them, her husband does not want to leave her, and they can't send their kids alone. So they all stay.
I hope to God known of us ever have to make such decisions ...
And where exactly do they go? We going to take them?
BBC reporting that IS flags and banners are flying over Kobane.
It's horrendous. There are still tens of thousands of people in that city, most of them Kurds. They will be raped and enslaved, many will be shot. Imagine the fate of any female Kurdish soldiers. Unspeakable.
If I was an American taxpayer, contributing to the world's mightiest military, at a cost of $650 BILLION a year, I'd be really quite angry. How mighty is the USA if it can't stop teenage jihad rapists in Toyotas?
It's not mighty at all. It is a chimera, a delusion, a fake. It's like buying the world's biggest golden dildo, to disguise the fact you are impotent, and you never meet any women anyway.
The tin-foil hatted conspiracy theorists would suggest America's problem is working out who is my enemy's enemy's enemy -- that while it wants ISIL defeated, it does not want any of ISIL's enemies (Iran, Kurds, Assad, Russia, and so on) to win. More likely it is that no-one wants to commit thousands of troops to a war that is likely to be open-ended since there is no state actor inn a position to surrender.
Who is left in Kobane now? From a tactical point of view all they have done is to concentrate some of their most committed fighters into one area, and supplies could rapidly become a problem if Turkey does decide to step in. (I assume here that anyone with any sense of self preservation has got the hell out of town)
I'm not sure it's that easy to 'get the hell out of town'. You have people who are infirm, others who want to stay and help, and many who don't want to leave their lifetime home. Others will need transport, but not be able to get it, whilst others will fear the unknown of where they will be going, and the journey itself.
Then there will be a few who think IS won't be as bad as they're painted and want to risk it.
It's easy to imagine circumstances where an elderly couple do not want to leave the home they've lived in for decades, their daughter doesn't want to leave them, her husband does not want to leave her, and they can't send their kids alone. So they all stay.
I hope to God known of us ever have to make such decisions ...
And where exactly do they go? We going to take them?
That's an important question. Turkey's been doing a great job with the Syrian and Iraqi refugees so far. Perhaps we should be helping then with money to build and victual the camps; that way, when things are safe, the people can return home.
Civil wars end with one side winning. Not with an external power trying to force themselves into the conflict on behalf of one of the belligerents. Even as @DecrepitJohnL says, if they could work out whose side they wanted to be on.
The reality of it is that a surge was attempted and failed in Iraq so the chances of US+ dropping hundreds of thousands, literally hundreds of thousands of troops into the Levant to subdue IS (pls note: from 29 June 2014 = IS) is fantasy.
Some options (from a whole lot of very very bad ones) are a) send hundreds of thousands of allied troops to subdue IS, impose a legal, political, bureaucratic system on the region and then prop up their favoured government for the subsequent 50 years; b) to treat with them, draw a green line around where they are today or next week and say - here's your caliphate, please don't be so beastly; c) organise a (somehow anti-Sunni) Sunni coalition of the willing but frankly, it will be so US military advisor heavy we are kind of in "surge" territory again; d) impress upon Iran to reawaken it's Shia-Sunni, Iran-Iraq war consciousness and somehow what? Invade the Levant? Fund counter-groups? We are back in civil war territory and do we want Iran to win that one?
My $0.02? God that's tricky - probably "b)", realpolitikally. Not 100% sure that is the answer, can't think of any other options, however.
He was my boss at DWP for a bit. A nice and very ambitious/smart guy. He was the wrong sort of Labourite at the time. And wisely resigned. That caused quite a splash. IIRC he did it just as the 10pm news was starting.
This is just ridiculous. Alan Johnson has a reasonable future playing the well meaning straight guy on HIGNFY and other such tat until pretty much everyone has forgotten who he is, something I fear will not take as long as he would like.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
A Labour party led by James Parnell would be out of sight by now. But he probably made the right call that it was never going to happen.
But what do you make of James Purnell David?
I think it is worth remembering that he only had relatively modest jobs albeit he received rapid promotions to cabinet. He was involved in more than his fair share of controversy, not least in relation to expenses and CGT. It would be foolish to project Blairite ideals onto him in a way that might never have happened. The most impressive thing about his Parliamentary career was his resignation and, on one view, even that proved to be a miscalculation.
All that said I think the Labour party is desperately short of people with his level of competence and decision making skills. He would almost certainly have kept the Labour party in a position closer to that maintained by Blair and he would not have shied away from necessary modernisation of public services in fear of upsetting the Unions. I think he would have been a much more difficult person for the Tories to challenge than Ed is. But then there are a lot of people who fall within that definition.
I was at the CSA at the time.Another case of government being crap at buying IT software which only someone who is a black-belt in the World of Warcraft could make work.
EDIT to my post below. Wiki says just 40,000 people live - or lived - in Kobane - not 400,000 as Al Jazeera claim.
However this might just be confusion over the definition of Kobane the city and Kobane the region.
The BBC are saying that more than 160K have fled from the area across the border into Turkey. It is quite possible a lot of refugees have ended up there as a place of "safety".
Comments
He's very likeable, but completely screwed up the GP negotiation and is out of his depth on the economy. Labour have been led by Miliband for 3-4 years and it's not like people haven't suggested he's rubbish during that period.
As per Brown, they're only harming themselves by bitching uselessly instead of uniting behind their leader or just axing him.
Ain't gonna happen.
Has that been replicated across other pollsters? And how much do we think this will fade as we get closer to the election?
Not sure he'll stand though, and the Party may prefer Jowell or Khan.
He won't challenge Ed, nor should he. Paper talk.
I agree, it's very unlikely. But not totally beyond the realms of possibility.
(If TSE runs my guest article, you'll see how!)
"Until 1968, it was illegal to put the name of a political party on a ballot paper. Voters were expected to vote for a person, not a party. "
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/douglascarswellmp/100288791/voters-have-turned-against-politics-as-usual/
Sadly he'd probably be more popular than Ed Milliband, but I don't think that is a particular high praise.
Labour won't be changing anything this close to the election anyway and they probably don't need to.
A) He might lose
or
He might win.
Very happy with that.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1565364/Alan-Johnson-not-good-enough-to-be-PM.html
A yougov poll shows the Tories slightly ahead and bang Alan Johnson wants to challenge for the leadership the very next day. What happens if yougov made an outlier? He could have waited a few days to see the clear picture, but no he had to make a rushed half baked move.
Today is Monday and as I said by tonight we will know if yougov had an outlier.
But Alan Johnson doesn't seem to have patience.
It worked for Jim Callaghan...??
I've had a look at seats the Lib Dems are defending to see how many more seats they would hold onto, relative to UNS, for different levels of incumbency bonus. Obviously there are caveats, including that:
-The results are based on a UNS (apart from the incumbency effect, obviously) whereas in reality swings in contests involving Lib Dems can be are highly variable.
-The incumbency bonus is assumed to be equal for all Lib Dem incumbents
http://numbercruncheruk.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/the-lib-dem-incumbency-bonus-how-many.html
To cut to the chase, and bearing in mind all the caveats noted above and in the post, the analysis suggests that an incumbency effect of around 6 points would likely be needed to save more than ten seats relative to a uniform national swing. On current polling, this points to a seat total somewhere in the 20s. But I'll avoid making formal seat projections for the time being.
You could say Jim Murphy looked like he had more than two brain cells to rub together, but he's Scottish and they are going to get devomax at some point in the next year or so.
The fact that Alan Johnson is being mentioned shows the lack of viable alternatives at the top of the Labour party.
That enough subcontinent people will vote for him purely because of his ethnicity and not his merits.
I bought a companion rabbit for our remaining Doe yesterday, one of them will have to be neutered eventually though.
Well it's clear they [lucifer & prometheus] both had their roots in the same source beliefs.
But the difference was that while Lucifer got up and raged against God and publicly tried to encourage defecters, Prometheus snuck into Olympus one night and pinched some of the best goodies before handing them out willy-nilly with no thought given to the long-term consequences.
I'll leave it to you to figure out the simile.
@Plato
Don't go with the Jackson films. They're terrible. If you want to watch it, watch the cartoon from 1978.
Sadly they stopped it halfway through when the illustrator died, but it's far far better...
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_(1978_film)
After discussing Party conferences and seasides - it seemed in keeping.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobby_Lud
"Well his merits are actually pretty strong, but yes, there are areas where he could be expected to win about 120% of the votes."
lol
And speaking of cartoon and Jim Murphy upthread - he really does look like Skeletor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohort_(military_unit)
2 jags might have taken the bait but some are much poorer than him,and a lot wiser.
It's pretty dark...
That interview on the Daily Politics, Paddy Ashdown was incredibly prickly from the off. Either he got out of bed the wrong side or he has some serious issues with Neil.
Heh!
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/cohort
/pedant
This Telegraph piece and the Sunday Times one yesterday attempting to sow seeds of unrest within Labour.
Yet, er, the Tories are two MPs down!
Potentially about to lose the resulting 2 by elections on the spin (although I still fancy the Tories to hold in R&S despite Survation)! Hell maybe about to break loose, but it is the Tories who are in the path of the developing storm.
Look in your own back yard RWP.
Disappointing for the Tories so soon after their conference.
Interesting. More polls needed.
The current issue of Viz features a Roger Mellie idea for a new TV programme called "What's My Rumour?" where contestants have to guess what is the rumour circulating on the internet about celebrity guests.
"Only" I commented "if they're not cooked properly!"
Took me quite a long time to become well thought of again, certainly by the younger female members of staff!
Threatening the freedom of the press.
His political career is over. Finished. An ex parrot etc.
It does show, however, that David Miliband was smart to get out of the building.
Ahh! Labour to have it's Ming Moment.
I was quite taken aback - then laughed out loud. I'll look at him in a whole new light from now on!
Just looking at the Survation poll. 27% of 2010 Con voters are 'undecided', but 'likely to vote'.
Table 4, page 7
http://survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Heywood-Middleton-Tables.pdf
This week's Ashcroft National Poll, plus Heywood & Middleton by-election poll, all on @ConHome today at 4pm.
But no, I'm not betting on him taking over from Ed Miliband.
Personally I just like interviewers who are functionally numerate. It is so rare. Neil and Evan Davis and then I have to think for a bit. Maybe it is that ability to count that makes them feel so superior in the media world?
Time for you to lead an elite team of volunteer thriller writers into the jaws of hell in an attempt to rescue western civilization Sean.
Or you can stay at home, drink your wine, and let every other poor sod do the fighting for you.
Good job I’d had lunch otherwise I’d have become hungry!
"SeanT's books are banned in areas under ISIS control"
They might be brutal and sadistic....but at least they have good taste in literature?
:-)
One way for Turkey to manage their Kurdish Problem. What a bastard President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has turned out to be. Not a move against IS in Kobane.
#Kurdish fighter who appeared on a BBC report in Sept, shot herself to avoid #ISIS capture during fighting. #Kobane pic.twitter.com/JMEXd1vvMe
— Rudaw English (@RudawEnglish)
October 6, 2014
For example, he challenged Hague on not meeting the immigration target at Conservative conference. He asked why the target hadn't been met and why people shouldn't vote UKIP given that failure; what was Hague going to do about it, to meet the pledge?
One gets the impression that had it been Naughtie, Mair or Snow they might have quoted someone in the Tory party who had reservations (e.g. Mark Field) and instead asked him why he didn't just abandon the target given it had failed.
You also soiled your underwear when some kids got a bit frisky in your "burb"?
You credentials as a hero are a bit suspect.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2781685/He-exhorted-dervishes-like-Mahdi-Omdurman-QUENTIN-LETTS-Lib-Dem-conference.html#ixzz3FM772cmG
There will come a point when it is in one or other of their interests to do so but at the moment their relative strength vis a vis their neighbours is simply being increased. The idea that token flights with strict instructions not to risk the lives of a civilian are going to make any difference are strictly for the fantasists amongst us.
Meanwhile the performance of that incredibly expensively created and trained Iraqi army is nothing short of completely embarrassing. Embarrassing for themselves and for the many units who claimed they had done good work training them.
One is full of brutal and sadistic treatment.
The other is a terrorist organisation.
Oh different Cobane!!
I would not bet on Danny.
http://www.libdemvoice.org/whos-up-whos-down-how-party-members-rate-the-performances-of-leading-lib-dems-11-42765.html
We're all watching Strictly.
(I assume here that anyone with any sense of self preservation has got the hell out of town)
All that said I think the Labour party is desperately short of people with his level of competence and decision making skills. He would almost certainly have kept the Labour party in a position closer to that maintained by Blair and he would not have shied away from necessary modernisation of public services in fear of upsetting the Unions. I think he would have been a much more difficult person for the Tories to challenge than Ed is. But then there are a lot of people who fall within that definition.
Then there will be a few who think IS won't be as bad as they're painted and want to risk it.
It's easy to imagine circumstances where an elderly couple do not want to leave the home they've lived in for decades, their daughter doesn't want to leave them, her husband does not want to leave her, and they can't send their kids alone. So they all stay.
I hope to God known of us ever have to make such decisions ...
And where exactly do they go? We going to take them?
Blimey, how desperate are things within Labour? - AJ is a nice guy, but not PM material imho.
I predicted last year that all three party leaders would still be there next May - nothing has made me change my mind.
The reality of it is that a surge was attempted and failed in Iraq so the chances of US+ dropping hundreds of thousands, literally hundreds of thousands of troops into the Levant to subdue IS (pls note: from 29 June 2014 = IS) is fantasy.
Some options (from a whole lot of very very bad ones) are a) send hundreds of thousands of allied troops to subdue IS, impose a legal, political, bureaucratic system on the region and then prop up their favoured government for the subsequent 50 years; b) to treat with them, draw a green line around where they are today or next week and say - here's your caliphate, please don't be so beastly; c) organise a (somehow anti-Sunni) Sunni coalition of the willing but frankly, it will be so US military advisor heavy we are kind of in "surge" territory again; d) impress upon Iran to reawaken it's Shia-Sunni, Iran-Iraq war consciousness and somehow what? Invade the Levant? Fund counter-groups? We are back in civil war territory and do we want Iran to win that one?
My $0.02? God that's tricky - probably "b)", realpolitikally. Not 100% sure that is the answer, can't think of any other options, however.
The lack of drones etc is odd. Very odd.