Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview: September 18th 2014 (Referendum

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited September 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview: September 18th 2014 (Referendum Day)

Abergele, Pensarn on Conwy (Lab Defence)
Result of council at last election (2012): Independents 19, Conservatives 13, Plaid Cymru 12, Labour 10, Liberal Democrats 5 (No Overall Control, Independents short by 14)
Result of ward at last election (2012): Labour 407 (55%), Independent 186 (25%), Conservative 145 (20%)
Candidates duly nominated:

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • Winning here too!
  • JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    I'm minus 2 bottles of champers...
  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    edited September 2014
    repost FPT:
    tessyC said:


    Also think Scottish and Welsh MPs should replace the constituency members of their Assembly/Parliament. Why should they get paid the same as English MPs if they are doing a fraction of the work. Also in that case we would not have 2 tier MPs, they would all have a say on their domestic issues and they meet as a whole for UK matters.


    I thought about this, but it's a bit of a non-starter in practical terms and would be bitterly opposed. It wouldn't solve the 2 tier MP problem either, because you'd have constituency MPs who work hard to win a FPTP seat and then have to spend part of the week in Westminster and part of it in Holyrood/Cardiff, whilst the list MSPs/MAs put their feet up and just turn up in Holyrood/Cardiff. It would also have to mean Holyrood/Cardiff could only sit 3 day weeks realistically
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    JBriskin said:

    I'm minus 2 bottles of champers...

    I cracked open a lovely singl malt last night too :)
  • LennonLennon Posts: 1,782
    Thanks for this Harry - even if it did (somewhat understandably) get totally swamped and lost in the other action.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578
    Labour on the rise! Or not
    SeanT said:

    Just realised that indyref was the first political campaign that's ever engaged me.

    I donated £ to NO, wrote loads of blogs and tweets, even went on a rally! etc.

    Will it be the last?

    EU Ref (assuming it ever happens)?
  • Not quite the right context, but I can't get this song out of my head today

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdOCWUgwiWs
  • JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    edited September 2014
    SeanT said:

    Just realised that indyref was the first political campaign that's ever engaged me.

    I donated £ to NO, wrote loads of blogs and tweets, even went on a rally! etc.

    Will it be the last?

    Says the most infamous journo that posts on the UK premier political website...

  • FF42FF42 Posts: 114
    AllyM said:

    FF42 said:

    AllyM said:



    I always had 40% as the danger threshold for Salmond. On that basis, he can plausibly say he shifted the independence cause forward. Disappointment is only relative to the polls a week before the referendum. He doesn't have to go, but it's likely he'll call it a day anyway.Despite his disingenuousness his political goal is an independent Scotland and he won't be able to do anything further on that. Retirement could be a lot more fun for him.

    Your last sentence, I was speaking about that yesterday with someone. We both agreed that, much like you say, there is not much more for Salmond Politically - beyond the warmonger role with Westminster for further powers.

    As such, we both reckoned he could do pretty well for himself post Political retirement. I mused 2016 is the absolute longest he'd stick around for.

    Write a book and live further well off how he gave 'Westminster a good boot in the stones'.
    On another topic, Ally, I don't know if you read The Scotsman, some choice phrases from Bill Jamieson for your I never want to hear this again collection.

    I pick out "it's for our grandchildren" to add to your list. I also like "I may be in Budleigh Salterton but I’m quarter Scottish, you know…"
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,091
    Still lurking, and thanks to everybody for making this a really informative forum.

    My two-penn'orth, for what it's worth:
    1) Thank you Scotland for a really great result with the potential to update the UK into something fit for the present and future.

    2) This is the right time to consider changes to FPTP and HoL, alongside a full constitutional review - the previous attempt was totally out of context.

    3) A crucial factor in devolution of spending powers is recognition of where the money comes from. That needs accurate accounting - no fudges like over North Sea oil - and a willingness on the part of net recipients to acknowledge some gratitude for the funding they receive.

    4) As some of you may remember I'm a little bit of a leftie so apols to Labour people whom this may offend: I'd like to think that the strong vote for change in Labour heartlands gives the party a kick up the backside.

    Bit pushed for time so I may not be able to stick around to answer responses. I'l try to check back tomorrow.

    Thanks once again to you all.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited September 2014
    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    edited September 2014
    Scrapheap, yes you comfortably finished ahead of me in the prediction competition.

    I was the Bobby Sol to your Gary Lineker, the Jade Dernbach to your Jimmy Anderson.
  • VerulamiusVerulamius Posts: 1,549
    edited September 2014
    On Labour leaders with a non UK seat, the list missed out Michael Foot. Or did Monmouthshire count as England back then?

    So ignoring temporary leaders you have to go back to Wilson to find a leader who was both born in England and represented an English seat.
  • JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    [Well done Scotland. It was emotional.]

    Well quite, that's how it works in refs that aren't your home. Let me assure you, as a PB Scot, that it was far too intense for some of us.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited September 2014
    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
  • Scrapheap, yes you comfortably finished ahead of me in the prediction competition.

    I was the Bobby Sol to your Gary Lineker, the Jade Dernbach to your Jimmy Anderson.

    YES!

    You were the Stevie G fall-guy this time....
  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
  • JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    edited September 2014
    SeanT said:

    JBriskin said:

    [Well done Scotland. It was emotional.]

    Well quite, that's how it works in refs that aren't your home. Let me assure you, as a PB Scot, that it was far too intense for some of us.

    It was a referendum in my home - Great Britain - too - as far as I was concerned. A referendum in which I had no say, which threatened to break up MY country.

    Be assured it was very emotional for some down here. Which is why I got actively involved in a political campaign for the first time in my life.

    And probably the last. I can't imagine anything as compelling as this. A vote to leave the EU will be like a vote to quit your office job, or not. Important - but not existential, like yesterday.
    UK Ok Sean!!! I think you type a bit too fast for me - I'm unemployed.

    Anyway - We Won!!!!!!!!!

  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    Re the delayed Salmond press conference, weren't we promised a "statement" from Her Majesty this afternoon "once the politicians had said what they wanted to say"?

    Is this his revenge for the "think very carefully" comment last weekend?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    edited September 2014
    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336
    AnneJGP said:

    Still lurking, and thanks to everybody for making this a really informative forum.

    My two-penn'orth, for what it's worth:
    1) Thank you Scotland for a really great result with the potential to update the UK into something fit for the present and future.

    2) This is the right time to consider changes to FPTP and HoL, alongside a full constitutional review - the previous attempt was totally out of context.

    3) A crucial factor in devolution of spending powers is recognition of where the money comes from. That needs accurate accounting - no fudges like over North Sea oil - and a willingness on the part of net recipients to acknowledge some gratitude for the funding they receive.

    4) As some of you may remember I'm a little bit of a leftie so apols to Labour people whom this may offend: I'd like to think that the strong vote for change in Labour heartlands gives the party a kick up the backside.

    Bit pushed for time so I may not be able to stick around to answer responses. I'l try to check back tomorrow.

    Thanks once again to you all.

    A charming post. I just hope your optimism about 1 and 2 is justified, though I may just be too sleepy. And 3 and 4 especially resonate with me. We all need a complete opening up of the books, though it's hard to be completely certain with things like Harris Tweed flying air cargo out of East Midlands (which is fair enough) and being calculated as an English export (which is misleading)!

  • JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    [It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process]

    I think this policy philosophy that has been maintstream agreed is why people don't take me that seriously in politics.... And why the F not.....
  • Re the delayed Salmond press conference, weren't we promised a "statement" from Her Majesty this afternoon "once the politicians had said what they wanted to say"?

    Is this his revenge for the "think very carefully" comment last weekend?


    "Think very carefully."

    And they did.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    edited September 2014

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Did you see David Coburn's show-stopper cameos on BBC and ITV last night just to reinforce that..
  • RobCRobC Posts: 398

    Re the delayed Salmond press conference, weren't we promised a "statement" from Her Majesty this afternoon "once the politicians had said what they wanted to say"?

    Is this his revenge for the "think very carefully" comment last weekend?

    In the sense that anyone who actually thought carefully rather than based on emotions would vote No? I think people are reading too much into her maj's comment.
  • isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Same sad smears from you Bob. You will never learn. Which is a good thing actually because it is one of the reasons UKIP are doing so well.

    Now as it happens I don't have the same concerns about immigration that Farage does - at least not to the same extent - but the more people like you try and claim that genuine concerns about important issues are simple racism, the more the public will scorn you.
  • TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
    Maybe Hague will be more willing to be radical and really deal with the issue properly because he knows it will not impact his political career.

    I honestly don't know but I would not dismiss him out of hand just because he is not standing in 2015.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    edited September 2014

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    You have to chuckle when City commodities trader and Old Alleynian Farage rants on about Cameron's 'rich chums', whilst being bankrolled by billionaire Paul Sykes, and Jacobean castle owning, Old Etonian, Stuart Wheeler.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Who needs either when you have the LibLabCon numpties who get more upset at strongly worded UKIP leaflets than the industrial rape of children. There were a lot of Conservative supporters, and even Labour supporters, who took a long look at themselves and their ideology after realising how much harm had come from the constant playing of the racism card.

    Unfortunately there's still a lot of morally despicable people like you who have just shrugged off the rapes of thousands and carries on smearing people as before.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336
    edited September 2014

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Did you see David Coburn's show-stopper cameos on BBC and ITV last night just to reinforce that..
    Mr C was claiming [edit, sorry, should have said in the Herald recently] that Yes should need 60% of the vote to have a mandate. Now that the No option has transmogrified from status quo to a change as well, I wonder what he would say if I argued that the same applied to No and we should have a re-run!
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Well I had pause for thought when I read it... It's unusual for a party leader to mention race so specifically. But I asked myself this...

    If a group of white men had been abusing children, children who were overwhelmingly, almost all, of an ethnic minority, and a right wing council of white men, had ignored it and covered it up, would I think bad of a party leader who said that the ethnic minority had been let down?

    I wouldn't, so I think it's fair enough for Farage to say it here. Not saying it would be carrying on the same as before, and sometimes you have to say it like it is.

    You are saying it is racist to point out what's happened in South Yorkshire. Well that's what plenty of people thought in the last 20 years. Look what came of it
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251

    TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
    Maybe Hague will be more willing to be radical and really deal with the issue properly because he knows it will not impact his political career.

    I honestly don't know but I would not dismiss him out of hand just because he is not standing in 2015.
    Maybe although for me Hague lost credibility with his gung ho initiative against Assad which fortunately was voted down by the HoC.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    You have to chuckle when City commodities trader and Old Alleynian Farage rants on about Cameron's 'rich chums', whilst being bankrolled by billionaire Paul Sykes, and Jacobean castle owning, Old Etonian, Stuart Wheeler.
    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    edited September 2014

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Same sad smears from you Bob. You will never learn. Which is a good thing actually because it is one of the reasons UKIP are doing so well.

    Now as it happens I don't have the same concerns about immigration that Farage does - at least not to the same extent - but the more people like you try and claim that genuine concerns about important issues are simple racism, the more the public will scorn you.
    Richard it is nevertheless a one-trick pony and reminiscent of the worst type of NF/BNP type literature.

    Everyone in UKIP might be like you: that is, has a reasonable view of immigration (as does your next leader, Mr Carswell) and I grant that even to discuss immigration, and it needs discussion, is problematic, such is the hair trigger of public and media outrage. For that I have sympathy.

    But.

    It is beginning to be a case of if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then...

    Change the tune. UKIPs' stance on immigration is well-known; let it become more subconscious. Meanwhile why not lead on, oh I don't know, electoral reform. One element of which, EV4EL, has now, fortuitously become ok to talk about.

    Or health. Or women's issues (following Duncan).

    But not f**king immigration because the leaflet-writers at least and perhaps Nigel himself do not have the wit or understanding to make it anything other than nasty, hateful and fearmongering.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,890
    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties
  • Good Old Queen Bess called it absolutely right. She's one hell of a canny lady.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    I have a feeling that the english question will cause a fight inside the Tories on the scale of Maastricht.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336
    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    I have to say that I'm not at all impressed with UK election security, quite independent (so to speak) of the above. I'd very much like to see improvements made to it.

  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    edited September 2014
    Socrates said:

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    You have to chuckle when City commodities trader and Old Alleynian Farage rants on about Cameron's 'rich chums', whilst being bankrolled by billionaire Paul Sykes, and Jacobean castle owning, Old Etonian, Stuart Wheeler.
    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.
    So you say, yet Farage goes to great lengths to use wealth and a privileged education as a stick with which to beat them in his letter.

    '... stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums ...'

    followed by -

    ' John Bickley is the real thing. Born into a Labour Trade Union background...'

    Nigel's words.

  • Norm said:

    TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
    Maybe Hague will be more willing to be radical and really deal with the issue properly because he knows it will not impact his political career.

    I honestly don't know but I would not dismiss him out of hand just because he is not standing in 2015.
    Maybe although for me Hague lost credibility with his gung ho initiative against Assad which fortunately was voted down by the HoC.
    Surely you mean unfortunately; at least for the people of Syria and Iraq, who have had to suffer another year of death, torture and displacement due to the failure of the HoC and Miliband?

    I'm ashamed to be part of a country that sits on its hands whilst evil people use chemical weapons.

    Again.
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251
    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    My suggestion to them " foutre le camp".
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    So England could end up with lower income taxes and lower benefits than Scotland under an new settlement.

    That could mean jobs flowing South and benefit claimants flowing North.

    Could really test the limits of socialism..
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    I have a feeling that the English question will cause a fight inside the Tories on the scale of Maastricht.

    LOL ....What will it do to labour??
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251
    edited September 2014

    Norm said:

    TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
    Maybe Hague will be more willing to be radical and really deal with the issue properly because he knows it will not impact his political career.

    I honestly don't know but I would not dismiss him out of hand just because he is not standing in 2015.
    Maybe although for me Hague lost credibility with his gung ho initiative against Assad which fortunately was voted down by the HoC.
    Surely you mean unfortunately; at least for the people of Syria and Iraq, who have had to suffer another year of death, torture and displacement due to the failure of the HoC and Miliband?

    I'm ashamed to be part of a country that sits on its hands whilst evil people use chemical weapons.

    Again.
    Sorry but I disagree - the liberal interventionist consensus has caused far more problems than it's solved since 2001.
  • Speedy said:

    I have a feeling that the english question will cause a fight inside the Tories on the scale of Maastricht.

    Why do you think that? 97% of Cameron's MPs represent English constituencies and can't see many opposing EVEL
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited September 2014
    Socrates said:

    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.

    Really?

    In that case, how do you explain this, from the UKIP leaflet Bob posted?

    .. all the while stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums who haven't got a clue.

    Quite apart from anything else, it happens to be a straightforward, no-holds barred, objectively verifiable lie. The number of Old Etonians that the Cabinet is 'stacked with' happens to be precisely one: David Cameron, or two if you widen the definition to include Oliver Letwin, who attends cabinet.

    Now, it may be good politics for UKIP to imitate Labour and stir up class hatred, but they can hardly complain when people point out that they are doing so.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    I am continually amazed by how crazy some of our fellow citizens can be sometimes. There was a hint of this during the campaign ("the polls cant be right because everyone I know is voting 'yes' so they are rigging it to show 'no' ahead").

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    Tempted to sign that, just for the lols.
  • Speedy said:

    I have a feeling that the english question will cause a fight inside the Tories on the scale of Maastricht.

    Why do you think that? 97% of Cameron's MPs represent English constituencies and can't see many opposing EVEL
    Indeed. The only fight will be the ones which want to go further and have an English Parliament.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    Carnyx said:

    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    I have to say that I'm not at all impressed with UK election security, quite independent (so to speak) of the above. I'd very much like to see improvements made to it.

    What criticisms would you make of it in particular?

  • Norm said:

    Norm said:

    TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
    Maybe Hague will be more willing to be radical and really deal with the issue properly because he knows it will not impact his political career.

    I honestly don't know but I would not dismiss him out of hand just because he is not standing in 2015.
    Maybe although for me Hague lost credibility with his gung ho initiative against Assad which fortunately was voted down by the HoC.
    Surely you mean unfortunately; at least for the people of Syria and Iraq, who have had to suffer another year of death, torture and displacement due to the failure of the HoC and Miliband?

    I'm ashamed to be part of a country that sits on its hands whilst evil people use chemical weapons.

    Again.
    Sorry but I disagree - the liberal interventionist consensus has caused far more problems than it's solved since 2001.
    I'm sure the people trapped between a combination of Assad's forces, IS-IS/IL and Al-Nusra sympathise with your bleeding heart.
  • David-Lee Priest's essential textbook-join the 2% elite,The Betting Edge.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Betting-Edge-Profitable-Gamblers/dp/1906820864
  • TOPPING said:


    Richard it is nevertheless a one-trick pony and reminiscent of the worst type of NF/BNP type literature.

    Everyone in UKIP might be like you: that is, has a reasonable view of immigration (as does your next leader, Mr Carswell) and I grant that even to discuss immigration, and it needs discussion, is problematic, such is the hair trigger of public and media outrage. For that I have sympathy.

    But.

    It is beginning to be a case of if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then...

    Change the tune. UKIPs' stance on immigration is well-known; let it become more subconscious. Meanwhile why not lead on, oh I don't know, electoral reform. One element of which, EV4EL, has now, fortuitously become ok to talk about.

    Or health. Or women's issues (following Duncan).

    But not f**king immigration because the leaflet-writers at least and perhaps Nigel himself do not have the wit or understanding to make it anything other than nasty, hateful and fearmongering.

    Unfortunately as others have pointed out it is exactly that policy - of don't say anything that might be construed as anti-immigrant or un-PC - that has led directly to the issues we are now seeing in Rotherham .

    The daft thing is about it - and this is where Farage is wrong - is that those perpetrating these crimes are not doing them because they are immigrants but because they are bad people. But the fear and oppression that has been engendered by the multi-cultural mafia who have castrated anyone who dares even criticise a cultural or religious difference has effectively silenced all the normal routes of legitimate opposition and scrutiny.

    So now that all of this has finally been exposed I am afraid it will be a case of reaping what you sow. Until such times as we have a proper grown up debate about all these issues - including the cultural ghettos we have encouraged over the last few decades - you can expect some pretty blunt words from those who feel vindicated and who are now no longer afraid to raise legitimate concerns.

    Calling such people BNP-lite is pointless and of course incorrect. But it is a sign of how warped the whole argument has become that people like you think it is a reasonable or even effective criticism. It is intellectually lazy and will simply serve to enhance UKIP's position.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    Labour have rejected David Cameron's proposals to secure English-only votes on English laws at the same time as giving greater devolution to Scotland.

    Instead, Ed Miliband called for a constitutional convention to address demands for wider devolution of powers.

    The Labour leader said there needed to be a series of regional "dialogues" covering every area of the UK on how power could be dispersed from Westminster - including in England.

    Among the issues he said should be considered are the reforms that would be needed at Westminster as more power is devolved to Scotland - including the case for a "senate of the nations and regions" or for codifying the constitution.

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    Farages letter to the voters in Heywood and Middleton... Quite strong stuff


    twitter.com/Broomleigh/status/512917817948372993/photo/1

    Who needs the BNP when you've got UKIP, eh?
    Same sad smears from you Bob. You will never learn. Which is a good thing actually because it is one of the reasons UKIP are doing so well.

    Now as it happens I don't have the same concerns about immigration that Farage does - at least not to the same extent - but the more people like you try and claim that genuine concerns about important issues are simple racism, the more the public will scorn you.
    Richard it is nevertheless a one-trick pony and reminiscent of the worst type of NF/BNP type literature.

    Everyone in UKIP might be like you: that is, has a reasonable view of immigration (as does your next leader, Mr Carswell) and I grant that even to discuss immigration, and it needs discussion, is problematic, such is the hair trigger of public and media outrage. For that I have sympathy.

    But.

    It is beginning to be a case of if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then...

    Change the tune. UKIPs' stance on immigration is well-known; let it become more subconscious. Meanwhile why not lead on, oh I don't know, electoral reform. One element of which, EV4EL, has now, fortuitously become ok to talk about.

    Or health. Or women's issues (following Duncan).

    But not f**king immigration because the leaflet-writers at least and perhaps Nigel himself do not have the wit or understanding to make it anything other than nasty, hateful and fearmongering.
    Yeah I suppose people who are outraged about institutionalised child abuse could really do with a party banging on about electoral reform

    I think you keep doing things your way and we'll do things our way... See how that turns out
  • TGOHF said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    Labour have rejected David Cameron's proposals to secure English-only votes on English laws at the same time as giving greater devolution to Scotland.

    Instead, Ed Miliband called for a constitutional convention to address demands for wider devolution of powers.

    The Labour leader said there needed to be a series of regional "dialogues" covering every area of the UK on how power could be dispersed from Westminster - including in England.

    Among the issues he said should be considered are the reforms that would be needed at Westminster as more power is devolved to Scotland - including the case for a "senate of the nations and regions" or for codifying the constitution.

    As I said earlier, the chances are that a "constitutional convention" would be filled with special-interest bodies and not come to any conclusion.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,054
    Ed walked right into that one didn't he. EV4EL plays very well across the spectrum, I think Dave and George have got him on the hook here. Balls would be too smart for this and agree then frustrate it at the committee stages and HoL while still overtly backing the principle. Ed should have realised bynow that no one wants regional assemblies or to break England up. It is a mminority position heldonly by the most partisan Labour supporters.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    A glimpse of what might have been under the rule of Eck

    Severin Carrell ‏@severincarrell 12m
    The Guardian declined its place at @AlexSalmond post-#indyref press
    conference after Scottish govt insisted on picking @guardian reporter
  • There will for sure be arguments within and between parties over UK-wide devolution. But one underlying and unavoidable aspect is that there is now a very very public debate being demanded by all on how to make all citizens of the UK constitutionally equal. We can thank the Scots for that.
  • What I find insidious about the Farage letter is that he only seems to be showing any interest in the white victims of the rape gangs, when actually there was mix of young people and children affected. This from the Jay report:

    Latterly, some child victims of CSE and some perpetrators had originated from the Roma Slovak community, with a steady increase in the number of child protection cases involving Roma children, though mainly in the category of neglect. Work with Roma families was one of the six priorities of the Child Sexual Exploitation sub-group of the Safeguarding Board in 2012. The Roma population in Rotherham was proportionately much larger than in bigger areas such as Bradford and Manchester.

    And:

    The Deputy Children's Commissioner’s report reached a similar conclusion to the Muslim Women's Network research, stating 'one of these myths was that only white girls are victims of sexual exploitation by Asian or Muslim males, as if these men only abuse outside of their own community, driven by hatred and contempt for white females. This belief flies in the face of evidence that shows that those who violate children are most likely to target those who are closest to them and most easily accessible.' The Home Affairs Select Committee quoted witnesses saying that cases of Asian men grooming Asian girls did not come to light because victims 'are often alienated and ostracised by their own families and by the whole community, if they go public with allegations of abuse.'
  • Guido Fawkes ‏@GuidoFawkes · 2 mins
    That "vow" didn't last long: BBC reporting Miliband will not sign up to the PM's plan to give more powers to the Scottish Parliament.

    Backtracking quickly Mr Miliband....
  • Chris_AChris_A Posts: 1,237

    Socrates said:

    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.

    Really?

    In that case, how do you explain this, from the UKIP leaflet Bob posted?

    .. all the while stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums who haven't got a clue.

    Quite apart from anything else, it happens to be a straightforward, no-holds barred, objectively verifiable lie. The number of Old Etonians that the Cabinet is 'stacked with' happens to be precisely one: David Cameron, or two if you widen the definition to include Oliver Letwin, who attends cabinet.

    Now, it may be good politics for UKIP to imitate Labour and stir up class hatred, but they can hardly complain when people point out that they are doing so.
    UKIP lying? Heaven forbid.

  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179

    Socrates said:

    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.

    Really?

    In that case, how do you explain this, from the UKIP leaflet Bob posted?

    .. all the while stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums who haven't got a clue.

    Quite apart from anything else, it happens to be a straightforward, no-holds barred, objectively verifiable lie. The number of Old Etonians that the Cabinet is 'stacked with' happens to be precisely one: David Cameron, or two if you widen the definition to include Oliver Letwin, who attends cabinet.

    Now, it may be good politics for UKIP to imitate Labour and stir up class hatred, but they can hardly complain when people point out that they are doing so.
    Exactly. My comment re the Farage letter was more its scaremongering tone and way it was not outwardly racist per se but constructed to get the point across in a "tap on the nose, nod and a wink" way. Exactly like the BNP used to do in the mailshots they posted through my letterbox in Burnley some years ago when shocking the established order by winning an English council seat in an upmarket Tory voting rural ward.

    Given the rape scandal that took place in Heywood, it seems shamefully opportunistic on a Griffin-like scale in his first election communication to focus on that rather than, for instance, setting out UKIP's positive vision for the UK, or focusing on their campaign to take us out of the EU (and there was me thinking this was their raison d'etre....)
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046

    TOPPING said:


    Richard it is nevertheless a one-trick pony and reminiscent of the worst type of NF/BNP type literature.

    But.

    It is beginning to be a case of if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then...

    Change the tune. UKIPs' stance on immigration is well-known; let it become more subconscious. Meanwhile why not lead on, oh I don't know, electoral reform. One element of which, EV4EL, has now, fortuitously become ok to talk about.

    Or health. Or women's issues (following Duncan).

    But not f**king immigration because the leaflet-writers at least and perhaps Nigel himself do not have the wit or understanding to make it anything other than nasty, hateful and fearmongering.

    Unfortunately as others have pointed out it is exactly that policy - of don't say anything that might be construed as anti-immigrant or un-PC - that has led directly to the issues we are now seeing in Rotherham .

    The daft thing is about it - and this is where Farage is wrong - is that those perpetrating these crimes are not doing them because they are immigrants but because they are bad people. But the fear and oppression that has been engendered by the multi-cultural mafia who have castrated anyone who dares even criticise a cultural or religious difference has effectively silenced all the normal routes of legitimate opposition and scrutiny.

    So now that all of this has finally been exposed I am afraid it will be a case of reaping what you sow. Until such times as we have a proper grown up debate about all these issues - including the cultural ghettos we have encouraged over the last few decades - you can expect some pretty blunt words from those who feel vindicated and who are now no longer afraid to raise legitimate concerns.

    Calling such people BNP-lite is pointless and of course incorrect. But it is a sign of how warped the whole argument has become that people like you think it is a reasonable or even effective criticism. It is intellectually lazy and will simply serve to enhance UKIP's position.
    I didn't say they are BNP-lite. Far from it. Super-far from it.

    I said (and I have said this since one of them popped through my letterbox at home and shocked me, shocked I tell you) the following:

    the UKIP election material is reminiscent of the worst of the racist BNP/NF literature of old.

    Call it dog whistle call it whatever you want it leaves a very nasty taste in the mouth. Plus it's not needed for grown-up politics today because in everyone's subconscious they associate UKIP with being anti-immigrant (or anti-too much immigrant or whatever it is). UKIP has that one in the bag. So no need to bang on about it.

    Better to focus on other things that, you know, will make you more electable in days to come.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    Guido Fawkes ‏@GuidoFawkes · 2 mins
    That "vow" didn't last long: BBC reporting Miliband will not sign up to the PM's plan to give more powers to the Scottish Parliament.

    Backtracking quickly Mr Miliband....

    Just because Miliband does not agree with the PM's current plan does not mean some sort of compromise will not be reached and the vow fulfilled, and I'm sure Guido knows that full well.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Telegraph also banned from Eck's presser.

  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251

    Norm said:

    Norm said:

    TOPPING said:

    isam said:

    SeanT said:

    indeed, following on from my last comment, I reckon I owe a debt of gratitude to the Scot Nats - even the maniacs - for making politics interesting & relevant.

    Well done Scotland. It was emotional.

    "making politics interesting & relevant. "

    The figure that strikes me is the 85% turnout... More than double the amount that voted labour or Tory in the last GE

    It would be good for the country if one party, obviously I think ukip should do it, would tell people to get out and vote, not necessarily for them, but just vote and feel part of the process

    It is difficult for the general public to say they fell disenfranchised if less than 66% of those able to vote, do so
    Look at @AnneJGP‌'s comment. It has really galvanised people.

    The tipping point (copyright all-seeing, all-knowing, on-the-ground @Stuart_Dickson‌) is how soon we all sink back into familiar ennui when it comes to politics.

    I liked what Dave said this morning. As a straight down the line Tory he spoke to me, I felt, but I see from the comments that he went beyond his own party. But what will come of it? I would have preferred Gove or someone else with integrity on the case rather than Hague who is leaving anyway.
    Maybe Hague will be more willing to be radical and really deal with the issue properly because he knows it will not impact his political career.

    I honestly don't know but I would not dismiss him out of hand just because he is not standing in 2015.
    Maybe although for me Hague lost credibility with his gung ho initiative against Assad which fortunately was voted down by the HoC.
    Surely you mean unfortunately; at least for the people of Syria and Iraq, who have had to suffer another year of death, torture and displacement due to the failure of the HoC and Miliband?

    I'm ashamed to be part of a country that sits on its hands whilst evil people use chemical weapons.

    Again.
    Sorry but I disagree - the liberal interventionist consensus has caused far more problems than it's solved since 2001.
    I'm sure the people trapped between a combination of Assad's forces, IS-IS/IL and Al-Nusra sympathise with your bleeding heart.


    Sorry too tired and happy today to get into a lengthy discussion on this. But I'm not sure how weakening Assad would have helped those now trapped by Is.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,890
    Carnyx said:



    I have to say that I'm not at all impressed with UK election security, quite independent (so to speak) of the above. I'd very much like to see improvements made to it.

    Agree there.

    M

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336
    edited September 2014
    Neil said:

    Carnyx said:

    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    I have to say that I'm not at all impressed with UK election security, quite independent (so to speak) of the above. I'd very much like to see improvements made to it.

    What criticisms would you make of it in particular?

    Lack of identity checks, other than the postal card.
    No need even to produce the postal notification card.
    Possible need for restriction of postal voting (not just due to abuse by others but the sort of problem we saw with Messrs Cameron et al moving the goals in the middle of postal voting).

    Others will know the mechanics o sorting, but the Glenrothes disappearance of ballot box(es) suggests a lack of tracing of the kind routinely used for the delivery of the merest Amazon paperback: but as I say others would know better.


  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited September 2014
    taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    Labour does not command a majority in the commons. If Dave and Clegg support the Hague proposals then it can be law before the GE. One thing that still unites the coalition partners is a desire to damage Labour. And doing actual damage to Labour / the right thing for England while Ed does himself reputational damage for self serving reasons is too delicious to ignore.
  • taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    The Purple Dice Predicts (PDP):
    Forecast for westminster seats won by UKIP GE 2015: 44 (forty four)

    The PDP monthly prediction.
  • Chris_A said:

    Socrates said:

    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.

    Really?

    In that case, how do you explain this, from the UKIP leaflet Bob posted?

    .. all the while stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums who haven't got a clue.

    Quite apart from anything else, it happens to be a straightforward, no-holds barred, objectively verifiable lie. The number of Old Etonians that the Cabinet is 'stacked with' happens to be precisely one: David Cameron, or two if you widen the definition to include Oliver Letwin, who attends cabinet.

    Now, it may be good politics for UKIP to imitate Labour and stir up class hatred, but they can hardly complain when people point out that they are doing so.
    UKIP lying? Heaven forbid.

    Don't worry Chris. It would take several lifetimes for them to stoop to the levels of dishonesty of your average Europhile.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

    Yes, but the Tories are backing something that is both in their advantage and logically fair. The Labour party is backing something is in their advantage and obviously completely unfair.
  • What I find insidious about the Farage letter is that he only seems to be showing any interest in the white victims of the rape gangs, when actually there was mix of young people and children affected.

    Yes, I agree with that:

    Look at the young white working-class girls of Rotherham and Rochdale. Labour and Liberal Democrat-led councils failed to protect them from years of abuse. Now we see people clinging to their jobs and refusing to take responsibilty for the evil those girls endured.

    Of course it's a very fair point they are making, and one which needs to be made. But it could be made without the dog-whistle of 'white working-class'. That is teetering on the edge of BNP-land.
  • Norm said:


    Sorry too tired and happy today to get into a lengthy discussion on this. But I'm not sure how weakening Assad would have helped those now trapped by Is.

    Fair enough, and I'm glad you're as happy as I am about last night's events.

    But too few people remember there was another party in the war this time last year: the secular FSA. They are the ones we would have been helping, and they were in a position where they could have won. We failed them and the people of Syria.
  • HughHugh Posts: 955
    A great shame that David Cameron and the Tories have decided to use the constitution to try and score some petty party political points against Labour.

    Predictable though, they have form like their boundary gerrymandering attempt.

    It stinks of Osborne. And it'll fail.
  • Guido Fawkes ‏@GuidoFawkes · 2 mins
    That "vow" didn't last long: BBC reporting Miliband will not sign up to the PM's plan to give more powers to the Scottish Parliament.

    Backtracking quickly Mr Miliband....

    I'm not surprised by Ed's change of position - pity he had to walk into the elephant trap before realising what the obvious ramifications of his initial proposals would be.

    Hard to see a positive up side for Ed, he just looks fickle and dishonest imho.


  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

    I got one a few weeks ago from aisha gaddafi criticising NATO and seeking some assistance. Fortunately I realised it was fake when 'she' referred to her father as the late 'President' of Libya, when of course we all know he was only the Brotherly Leader of the Revolution. Ha, I'm no fool, they'll need to do better than that.

    Now how can we help this poor widow, the world needs to look after its service families.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Hugh said:

    A great shame that David Cameron and the Tories have decided to use the constitution to try and score some petty party political points against Labour.

    Predictable though, they have form like their boundary gerrymandering attempt.

    It stinks of Osborne. And it'll fail.

    You predicted a new Tory leader yesterday...
  • Hugh said:

    A great shame that David Cameron and the Tories have decided to use the constitution to try and score some petty party political points against Labour.

    Predictable though, they have form like their boundary gerrymandering attempt.

    It stinks of Osborne. And it'll fail.

    Good try, Hugh.

    How's Cameron's resignation going for you?
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:

    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.

    Really?

    In that case, how do you explain this, from the UKIP leaflet Bob posted?

    .. all the while stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums who haven't got a clue.

    Quite apart from anything else, it happens to be a straightforward, no-holds barred, objectively verifiable lie. The number of Old Etonians that the Cabinet is 'stacked with' happens to be precisely one: David Cameron, or two if you widen the definition to include Oliver Letwin, who attends cabinet.

    Now, it may be good politics for UKIP to imitate Labour and stir up class hatred, but they can hardly complain when people point out that they are doing so.
    Do you see the "haven't got a clue" bit. That's the criticism. That's what you're not seeing. Now their richness probably explains the fact they haven't got a clue, so it's related, but it's not the criticism itself. You can have people who come from rich backgrounds that do "get it": FDR, as patrician as they come, was the classic example.
  • Socrates said:

    taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

    Yes, but the Tories are backing something that is both in their advantage and logically fair. The Labour party is backing something is in their advantage and obviously completely unfair.

    What is Labour backing? I have not seen any proposals yet.

  • HughHugh Posts: 955

    Hugh said:

    A great shame that David Cameron and the Tories have decided to use the constitution to try and score some petty party political points against Labour.

    Predictable though, they have form like their boundary gerrymandering attempt.

    It stinks of Osborne. And it'll fail.

    Good try, Hugh.

    How's Cameron's resignation going for you?
    Ah well, 8 months will fly by.
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    It stinks of Osborne. And it'll fail.

    Indeed. I'm sure there will be millions of English votes behind the principle of allowing Scottish MPs 'home rule' and a big say in England as well. Oh and money.

    I can see marching on the streets for those principles now....
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:

    The problem isn't that Cameron and his mates are rich. It's that they haven't done anything to address the concerns of low income folk about immigration, multiculturalism, mass gang rapes, etc. The fact you think the criticism is all about how much money he has shows how clueless you are.

    Really?

    In that case, how do you explain this, from the UKIP leaflet Bob posted?

    .. all the while stacking the Cabinet with Old Etonians and their rich chums who haven't got a clue.

    Quite apart from anything else, it happens to be a straightforward, no-holds barred, objectively verifiable lie. The number of Old Etonians that the Cabinet is 'stacked with' happens to be precisely one: David Cameron, or two if you widen the definition to include Oliver Letwin, who attends cabinet.

    Now, it may be good politics for UKIP to imitate Labour and stir up class hatred, but they can hardly complain when people point out that they are doing so.
    Exactly. My comment re the Farage letter was more its scaremongering tone and way it was not outwardly racist per se but constructed to get the point across in a "tap on the nose, nod and a wink" way. Exactly like the BNP used to do in the mailshots they posted through my letterbox in Burnley some years ago when shocking the established order by winning an English council seat in an upmarket Tory voting rural ward.

    Given the rape scandal that took place in Heywood, it seems shamefully opportunistic on a Griffin-like scale in his first election communication to focus on that rather than, for instance, setting out UKIP's positive vision for the UK, or focusing on their campaign to take us out of the EU (and there was me thinking this was their raison d'etre....)
    Complaining about "nod and a wink" campaigning is basically a method for saying "I know they're racist even though I have no evidence for it". There's absolutely nothing wrong with using a case of systemic failure of the authorities as evidence that change is needed. Why is it ok for people to do it about the financial crisis but not about child rape? This is an insane argument. You just don't want these matters brought up, so you call anyone that does racist.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,054

    taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

    The Tory proposals are fair and have popular cross party support among English voters according to Comres. By opposing the PM's plan for devomax in Scotland and EV4EL he is playing politics because he knows Labour would beseverely weakened in Westminster. Worse still is that if Dave and Nick deliver devomax and EV4EL without Labour both of them could see some kind of relaunch in Scotland.

    Ed needs to get on board and then deal with the consequences after the election. Maybe split off English Labour from Scottish Labour.
  • taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

    That might be true, but the argument is too strong, it's a simple matter of fairness

    How can labour defend the undefendable?.. (I guess they'll just do it anyway).
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Salmond chewing a wasp - not much grace here.

    And he is standing down !
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    Salmond resigns
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited September 2014
    Salmond resigns - standing down at SNP conference.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    MikeK said:

    The Purple Dice Predicts (PDP):
    Forecast for westminster seats won by UKIP GE 2015: 44 (forty four)

    The PDP monthly prediction.

    If only PDP was a spread betting firm!

  • Neil said:

    MattW said:

    "It wuz rigged. We demand a recount" petition now at 40,000+.

    There's a whole lotta lemmings-with-conspiracy-theories out there.

    https://www.change.org/p/alex-salmond-we-the-undersigned-demand-a-revote-of-the-scottish-referendum-counted-by-impartial-international-parties

    I am continually amazed by how crazy some of our fellow citizens can be sometimes. There was a hint of this during the campaign ("the polls cant be right because everyone I know is voting 'yes' so they are rigging it to show 'no' ahead").

    It's interesting. The evidence they offer there is possibly (if it were true) potential cause for a recount, but they're not calling for that: they're calling for a revote. For everyone to vote *again*.

    Basically, they just don't agree with the answer the referendum delivered.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:

    taffys said:

    Sounds fun - Telegraph

    These labour proposals won;t get tory support. This means the Scottish 'vows' won't go through. Scotland will be up in arms and we will be at constitutional deadlock.

    Ed is going to end up annoying everyone in....

    1. Scotland
    2. England

    purely for party reasons.

    Epic

    As opposed to the Tories, who have not considered party advantage at all. Let me tell you about an email I got the other day from the wife of a recently deceased Nigerian general ...

    Yes, but the Tories are backing something that is both in their advantage and logically fair. The Labour party is backing something is in their advantage and obviously completely unfair.

    What is Labour backing? I have not seen any proposals yet.

    More powers for Scotland with no action on England.
  • He's gone!!!

  • Salmond standing down when new leader elected.

  • Salmond quits as leader and first minister.

    Tipping point.
  • Socrates said:


    Do you see the "haven't got a clue" bit. That's the criticism. That's what you're not seeing. Now their richness probably explains the fact they haven't got a clue, so it's related, but it's not the criticism itself. You can have people who come from rich backgrounds that do "get it": FDR, as patrician as they come, was the classic example.

    One can argue about who has and hasn't got a clue, but one can't argue with the fact that the bit I quoted is a straightforward lie. The cabinet is not stacked with Old Etonians and their rich chums.
  • Salmond quits as leader and first minister.

    Tipping point.

    Damn, I was thinking of taking that bet yesterday!!
This discussion has been closed.