politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Spare a thought for the pollsters in the next few days
Just a week to go before the big day and there’s one group that’s getting very nervous – the pollsters. This is such a massive election that their final polls will be remembered for years just as now we point to surveys in Quebec in October 1995.
Cameron is of course a member of Clan Cameron through his Scottish father and perfectly entitled to wear a kilt, he is the most Scottish of the 3. Indeed all are hybrids, Clegg from Russian aristocrat stock and Miliband Belgian Jewish. Hopefully they will flesh out more of the devomax proposals together tomorrow as the 3 Scottish party leaders did this morning
Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
Sitting with a group of a dozen or so "oldies" watching cricket this afternoon. In Essex. General opinion, when Referendum was raised (not by me) was that we were reminded of a utility, phone or insurance company, faced with a client who didn't want to re-sign.
Shameful behaviour by Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. And definitely counter-productive to take Clegg!
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
7)Accusations that the scots living abroad who cannot vote/English in Scotland who can have swung it for one side or the other, which is unfair according to the other side.
I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.
Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...
Tempted to vote on how the leaders appeared on television rather than the enormous implications of the decision for the future of your country? Depressing but inevitable how the actual issues have disappeared into the background over the past few days, as personalities have come to the fore.
I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.
YorkCity Then the fightback begins if he says that, get rid of Cameron, put Hammond or David Davis in and form a pact with UKIP, Tory/UKIP government and a ruthless approach to negotiations from rUK government, including no currency union under any circumstances
I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.
Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...
God help a country that has creatures like Cameron, Clegg, and Milliband as their choices for PM.
Indeed.
Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?
I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.
The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.
Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.
Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
We really are seriously in the mire, if the best candidates for PM are Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. If I was Scottish, and a bit undecided, after today, I'd be draping myself in the Saltire, painting my face blue, and joining the SNP. It's been embarrassing. Westminster politicians have been talking tough since the referendum was announced, but now they're squealing and offering everything, including the kitchen sink. It absolutely stinks that devo-whatever was off the table, but now it's a bit close, Gordon Brown, yes, Gordon effing Brown has crawled out from under his rock to save the union with offers of near-as-damnit indy.
Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.
The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.
Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.
Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.
Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
'I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.'
If it doesn't happen in the next two years then it will in the next five or so years,so better to get it over with now and make a clean break.
TFS Scottish independence would be a huge boost to Farage, the English nationalist backlash will begin shortly after and he will almost certainly campaign hard on opposition to currency union, and could well hold the balance of power as a result in rUK
The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.
Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.
Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.
Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.
Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
I shouldn't think that will be at the top of anyone's priorities. The important thing will be the continuation of the horse racing industry. The issue I can see down the road is the taxation policy a Scottish Government might adopt in lieu of bookmaker's profits or turnover. Gambling is and remains a huge potential source of tax revenue for all Governments.
Greyhound racing in Scotland faces a similar dilemma but one thing I do know about Alex Salmond is he loves his racing and is very knowledgeable about it.
I once had a conversation with him along the Embankment on one of the strangest nights of my life back in the early 90s.
No need for Britain to fear leaving EU, say economists Economists say that the idea that millions of jobs would be lost if Britain pulled out of the EU is 'wholly misleading'.
Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?
I guess the rise in the Tory vote share since 1997 is the best guide, from 19% up to 26%, or from 0 seats to 8. Still not back to the 31% in 1983 though.
In terms of how it is likely to move in the future, this article best explains why Welsh nationalism and possible left wingers may go into decline.
We really are seriously in the mire, if the best candidates for PM are Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. If I was Scottish, and a bit undecided, after today, I'd be draping myself in the Saltire, painting my face blue, and joining the SNP. It's been embarrassing. Westminster politicians have been talking tough since the referendum was announced, but now they're squealing and offering everything, including the kitchen sink. It absolutely stinks that devo-whatever was off the table, but now it's a bit close, Gordon Brown, yes, Gordon effing Brown has crawled out from under his rock to save the union with offers of near-as-damnit indy.
Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.
Greetings TFS!
I completely agree. Devomax is a can of worms that needs to stay closed. Independence means independence, and if Hammond was the blabbermouth minister that said it was a bluff about currency union then he is not fit to be a negotiator.
We need a reincarnated Longshanks as our advocate, not some PPE jessie.
Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?
I guess the rise in the Tory vote share since 1997 is the best guide, from 19% up to 26%, or from 0 seats to 8. Still not back to the 31% in 1983 though.
In terms of how it is likely to move in the future, this article best explains why Welsh nationalism and possible left wingers may go into decline.
Mike said: "The referendum could make or break reputations"
That is the risk of being a pollster, but I suspect that they will have a thousand reasons to explain why the result varied so much from their predictions.
Just had a heated discussion with some Glaswegian Scots and it is almost impossible to understand what is happening. It appears that the Scots are playing Russian roulette and have loaded the pistol and put it to their head. They are now wondering whether to pull the trigger.
The panic is scary and gets worse by the hour. It is easy to admire Salmond when the gun is not pointing at your head but a lot harder when your job, money and wealth are all on the line.
The general agreement was that the best thing that could happen now was the cancellation of the vote until it was clear what the vote was about. My gut feeling is that the weekend has energised the No voters more than the Yes voters. While the No voters were silent before they are now the loudest voices you hear.
In Glasgow the general sentiment seems to be that voters are lost and going back to their tribes. The Rangers fans will vote No and the Celtic fans will vote Yes. This is not the way to start a bright future for Scotland by reigniting the Auld Firm battles.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
You haven't really thought this through have you? It's called the British Open, but it is organised by the R&A, who are based where?
So there will be a bit of unpicking. It's still boring and largely inconsequential. It's not exactly the crisis in Ukraine, Syria or Iraq is it? Some insignificant outpost in the wilds of the British Isles wants to make itself a fully independent state rather than a devolved one.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
The panic is scary and gets worse by the hour. It is easy to admire Salmond when the gun is not pointing at your head but a lot harder when your job, money and wealth are all on the line.
Are you saying that there is panic north of the border? That we should expect a sudden swing to "No"?
Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
Do you know if it is possible to change your mind after posting your postal vote? We have a No voter who now wants to change to Yes.
The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.
Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.
Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.
Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
Well, there's the RNLI, which continued to function in the Saorstat perfectly well, and carries on in Ireland just as it does in the UK.
"Ed Miliband has urged towns and cities across the United Kingdom to fly the Saltire in an attempt to encourage Scottish voters to stay in the union. Miliband, who raised the flag in Liverpool this morning with the city’s mayor, wants the rest of the UK to remind Scotland what they’ll be missing.
Miliband said: “Over the next few days we want cities, towns and villages across the UK to send a message to Scotland: stay with us. We want to see the Saltire flying above buildings all across our country.”"
It's simply called , The Open Championship. No British in the name.
Well quite, that was half the point, it gets called that, but it isn't. I doubt the R&A would be as small-minded as Fenster, and to stop it being held outside of Scotland.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
Apparently the American solution has been adopted: ie. anyone in the queue at 10pm will be allowed to vote. You don't have to be inside the polling station, which was the case at the 2010 general election.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.
Why shouldn't Salmond milk it? The effete Westminster elite have played right into his hands today.
Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.
Given the demonization of the poor man over the last few years by UK pols and media (google Dictator Bingo), common justice dictates that he's certainly entitled to one or two very small jabs in return. Indeed, David Cameron not so long ago made a very public and very unpleasant personal joke when meeting him, of the kind that would have been a diplomatic disaster the day after indy day. (I won't repeat it as I can't recall the exact wording, but it was a 'count the spoons after he's visited' sort of jibe.)
Indeed it may well be seen that one of the disastrous mistakes of BT was to obsess with Mr Salmond, and to focus on the man and equate the entire Yes movement with the SNP and then with him, to the degree that they completely lost depth of focus as to what has actually been happening.
And I'm neither a SNP member nor an uncritical observer of the chap.
Cameron is of course a member of Clan Cameron through his Scottish father and perfectly entitled to wear a kilt, he is the most Scottish of the 3. Indeed all are hybrids, Clegg from Russian aristocrat stock and Miliband Belgian Jewish. Hopefully they will flesh out more of the devomax proposals together tomorrow as the 3 Scottish party leaders did this morning
Cameron's Scottish lineage is far stronger than the vast majority of the YES folks who shout about Braveheart and the English. His father is from Aberdeenshire. His mother's grandmother was Lady Agnes Duff, daughter of the 5th Earl of Fife and granddaughter of the 18th Earl of Errol. Through those 2 he is descended from most of Scotland's oldest aristocratic families. Through the Countess of Errol he is of course a direct descendant of James VI and I and through that link a distant cousin of yours truly.
Anyone who is part of the extended family of Easterross has to be of fine Scottish lineage. If I'm not mistaken he is also a cousin of both mine and NPXMP through the Earls of Moray.
Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.
Given the demonization of the poor man over the last few years by UK pols and media (google Dictator Bingo), common justice dictates that he's certainly entitled to one or two very small jabs in return. Indeed, David Cameron not so long ago made a very public and very unpleasant personal joke when meeting him, of the kind that would have been a diplomatic disaster the day after indy day. (I won't repeat it as I can't recall the exact wording, but it was a 'count the spoons after he's visited' sort of jibe.)
Indeed it may well be seen that one of the disastrous mistakes of BT was to obsess with Mr Salmond, and to focus on the man and equate the entire Yes movement with the SNP and then with him, to the degree that they completely lost depth of focus as to what has actually been happening.
And I'm neither a SNP member nor an uncritical observer of the chap.
I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters) 2) Students not back/back early 3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010) 4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes 5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations 6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
Let's hope the queue is not in Stornoway.
More likely to be outside the chippie or butcher. Stornoway black pudding, yum!
'I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.'
If it doesn't happen in the next two years then it will in the next five or so years,so better to get it over with now and make a clean break.
John reluctantly I think you are correct. However I do not think the markets are going to just wait years after a yes vote, for politicians leisurely to discuss this by 2016.
The general agreement was that the best thing that could happen now was the cancellation of the vote until it was clear what the vote was about.
It's too late to stop, but I completely agree that it's madness that in 10 days time the vote will be over, but we'll have no real idea what it all means.
The most important decision in this country for a very long time and what will happen? Salmond doesn't know and has been bluffing from the start, the three monkey plainly haven't prepared, and now Brown is busy proposing to rip up our constitution without any consultation of the vast majority of UK citizens.
It's a farce, and our politicians are plumbing new depths almost by the hour.
Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.
Why shouldn't Salmond milk it? The effete Westminster elite have played right into his hands today.
One of the best descriptions of him I've heard is that he looks so pleased with himself that he'd drink his own bathwater (alternative beverages can be substituted here ...). Undeniably, a formidable politician, though.
We really are seriously in the mire, if the best candidates for PM are Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. If I was Scottish, and a bit undecided, after today, I'd be draping myself in the Saltire, painting my face blue, and joining the SNP. It's been embarrassing. Westminster politicians have been talking tough since the referendum was announced, but now they're squealing and offering everything, including the kitchen sink. It absolutely stinks that devo-whatever was off the table, but now it's a bit close, Gordon Brown, yes, Gordon effing Brown has crawled out from under his rock to save the union with offers of near-as-damnit indy.
Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.
Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.
If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.
1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat. 2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt. 3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible. 4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round. 5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.
Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
chortle
I think that will be pretty mild stuff if its a yes.
Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.
If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.
1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat. 2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt. 3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible. 4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round. 5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.
Really lovely prospect.
Ouch - that should read in event of Yes vote. (Must check before I post in future!)
Sitting with a group of a dozen or so "oldies" watching cricket this afternoon. In Essex. General opinion, when Referendum was raised (not by me) was that we were reminded of a utility, phone or insurance company, faced with a client who didn't want to re-sign.
Shameful behaviour by Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. And definitely counter-productive to take Clegg!
Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.
If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.
1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat. 2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt. 3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible. 4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round. 5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.
Really lovely prospect.
5 Scotland will get vetoed by UK on EU membership unitl it settles its debts - why wouldn't we ?
Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
For all until about 4 days ago this was supposed to be a debate within Scotland where "foreigners" weren't welcome. So it's an interesting definition of "jock" that excludes half of Scotland. The reason all of what is going on now looks horribly desperate is because the UK establishment have belatedly decided that they aren't ambivalent to Scotland leaving and want to get involved with only 10 days to go. A bit late really.
I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.
Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...
Tempted to vote on how the leaders appeared on television rather than the enormous implications of the decision for the future of your country? Depressing but inevitable how the actual issues have disappeared into the background over the past few days, as personalities have come to the fore.
Ho ho. Unionists spent the entire campaign slagging off Salmond. Glass houses and stones.
I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.
Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...
Tempted to vote on how the leaders appeared on television rather than the enormous implications of the decision for the future of your country? Depressing but inevitable how the actual issues have disappeared into the background over the past few days, as personalities have come to the fore.
Ho ho. Unionists spent the entire campaign slagging off Salmond. Glass houses and stones.
is there any reason to stop ? his economics are a disaster waiting to happen.
Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
For all until about 4 days ago this was supposed to be a debate within Scotland where "foreigners" weren't welcome. So it's an interesting definition of "jock" that excludes half of Scotland. The reason all of what is going on now looks horribly desperate is because the UK establishment have belatedly decided that they aren't ambivalent to Scotland leaving and want to get involved with only 10 days to go. A bit late really.
Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.
If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.
1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat. 2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt. 3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible. 4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round. 5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.
Really lovely prospect.
5 Scotland will get vetoed by UK on EU membership unitl it settles its debts - why wouldn't we ?
I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.
It's simply called , The Open Championship. No British in the name.
Well quite, that was half the point, it gets called that, but it isn't. I doubt the R&A would be as small-minded as Fenster, and to stop it being held outside of Scotland.
Lol, reel them in. Nothing is quite as easy as winding up a cybernat.
I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.
The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.
Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.
Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.
Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.
If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.
1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat. 2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt. 3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible. 4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round. 5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.
Really lovely prospect.
5 Scotland will get vetoed by UK on EU membership unitl it settles its debts - why wouldn't we ?
I suspect that we wouldn't because for all the initial reaction will probably include a lot of bitter people, me included, who won't want to give Scotland an inch, a strong Scotland is good for rUK. I don't think that means they will get all they want as the Yes side suggest, I think they put too much faith in people a) acting rationally b) agreeing that the rational approach is the one they support, c) the complexity of what they are asking for, but I do think rUK will be making a great many accomodations to a new Scottish state in fairly short order.
Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
For all until about 4 days ago this was supposed to be a debate within Scotland where "foreigners" weren't welcome. So it's an interesting definition of "jock" that excludes half of Scotland. The reason all of what is going on now looks horribly desperate is because the UK establishment have belatedly decided that they aren't ambivalent to Scotland leaving and want to get involved with only 10 days to go. A bit late really.
Tipping point.
How many more 'tipping points' do we have to endure before you lot finish deciding? I think we should be warned.
BTW - for all the talk of momentum etc., I still can't help feeling that the older voters will be unmoved by all this stuff. And that unlike the frothier nationalists are likely to take the impending visit of the three UK leaders at face value, ie, legitimate expression of extreme concern at hugely significant vote. The impression the Nats give is that they are having a laugh - not a good impression to give.
BTW - I was quite impressed by the Gordon Brown BT advert. Not usually a big fan but he does gravity well. And bringing his family into the equation is an astute move. People can identify with that. And he is post-ambition, unlike King Alex.
Cameron is of course a member of Clan Cameron through his Scottish father and perfectly entitled to wear a kilt, he is the most Scottish of the 3. Indeed all are hybrids, Clegg from Russian aristocrat stock and Miliband Belgian Jewish. Hopefully they will flesh out more of the devomax proposals together tomorrow as the 3 Scottish party leaders did this morning
Cameron's Scottish lineage is far stronger than the vast majority of the YES folks who shout about Braveheart and the English. His father is from Aberdeenshire. His mother's grandmother was Lady Agnes Duff, daughter of the 5th Earl of Fife and granddaughter of the 18th Earl of Errol. Through those 2 he is descended from most of Scotland's oldest aristocratic families. Through the Countess of Errol he is of course a direct descendant of James VI and I and through that link a distant cousin of yours truly.
Anyone who is part of the extended family of Easterross has to be of fine Scottish lineage. If I'm not mistaken he is also a cousin of both mine and NPXMP through the Earls of Moray.
Interesting. It's really surprising that he's not made more of his lineage ...
Comments
Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...
What could possibly happen next?
The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
On the 19th Salmond will be in full flow Maggie Thatcher , Clement Attlee, Winston Churchill your country has taken one hell of a beating 51% to 49%.
We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities
1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
2) Students not back/back early
3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
Shameful behaviour by Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. And definitely counter-productive to take Clegg!
I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.
The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.
The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
Also, Clegg would likely have a Cleggasm himself at the idea someone included him as a choice for PM.
Indeed.
Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?
The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.
Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.
Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.
Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
Great fun too. It will help loosen those tensions you've all been feeling lately.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturevideo/tvandradiovideo/11084038/Ohio-State-Marching-Band-pays-tribute-to-Game-of-Thrones-and-The-Office.html
'I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.'
If it doesn't happen in the next two years then it will in the next five or so years,so better to get it over with now and make a clean break.
Greyhound racing in Scotland faces a similar dilemma but one thing I do know about Alex Salmond is he loves his racing and is very knowledgeable about it.
I once had a conversation with him along the Embankment on one of the strangest nights of my life back in the early 90s.
It's called the British Open, but it is organised by the R&A, who are based where?
No need for Britain to fear leaving EU, say economists
Economists say that the idea that millions of jobs would be lost if Britain pulled out of the EU is 'wholly misleading'.
In terms of how it is likely to move in the future, this article best explains why Welsh nationalism and possible left wingers may go into decline.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/wales/10878554/Welsh-could-become-a-minority-in-Wales-as-English-set-sights-west.html
I completely agree. Devomax is a can of worms that needs to stay closed. Independence means independence, and if Hammond was the blabbermouth minister that said it was a bluff about currency union then he is not fit to be a negotiator.
We need a reincarnated Longshanks as our advocate, not some PPE jessie.
twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/509262474458050560/photo/1
That is the risk of being a pollster, but I suspect that they will have a thousand reasons to explain why the result varied so much from their predictions.
The panic is scary and gets worse by the hour. It is easy to admire Salmond when the gun is not pointing at your head but a lot harder when your job, money and wealth are all on the line.
The general agreement was that the best thing that could happen now was the cancellation of the vote until it was clear what the vote was about. My gut feeling is that the weekend has energised the No voters more than the Yes voters. While the No voters were silent before they are now the loudest voices you hear.
In Glasgow the general sentiment seems to be that voters are lost and going back to their tribes. The Rangers fans will vote No and the Celtic fans will vote Yes. This is not the way to start a bright future for Scotland by reigniting the Auld Firm battles.
Wow. Stop the earth.
Having said that I hope it does not, as the Scottish police have already gone to one service.
https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=Saltire&s=typd
"Ed Miliband has urged towns and cities across the United Kingdom to fly the Saltire in an attempt to encourage Scottish voters to stay in the union. Miliband, who raised the flag in Liverpool this morning with the city’s mayor, wants the rest of the UK to remind Scotland what they’ll be missing.
Miliband said: “Over the next few days we want cities, towns and villages across the UK to send a message to Scotland: stay with us. We want to see the Saltire flying above buildings all across our country.”"
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/09/are-you-heeding-ed-milibands-call-to-fly-the-saltire-across-the-uk-scotland-independence
I meant if Glasgow actually casts its votes clearly for Yes.
I doubt the R&A would be as small-minded as Fenster, and to stop it being held outside of Scotland.
*** SUSPENDED ***
It didn't happen.
Indeed it may well be seen that one of the disastrous mistakes of BT was to obsess with Mr Salmond, and to focus on the man and equate the entire Yes movement with the SNP and then with him, to the degree that they completely lost depth of focus as to what has actually been happening.
And I'm neither a SNP member nor an uncritical observer of the chap.
Anyone who is part of the extended family of Easterross has to be of fine Scottish lineage. If I'm not mistaken he is also a cousin of both mine and NPXMP through the Earls of Moray.
However I do not think the markets are going to just wait years after a yes vote, for politicians leisurely to discuss this by 2016.
The most important decision in this country for a very long time and what will happen? Salmond doesn't know and has been bluffing from the start, the three monkey plainly haven't prepared, and now Brown is busy proposing to rip up our constitution without any consultation of the vast majority of UK citizens.
It's a farce, and our politicians are plumbing new depths almost by the hour.
If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.
1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat.
2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt.
3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible.
4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round.
5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.
Really lovely prospect.
I think that will be pretty mild stuff if its a yes.
I guess Scotland will still be part of the 'British' Isles anyway.
Is there a missing NOT in that phrase?
i.e. "those who did NOT vote..."
Puhrleeese.
http://www.royalcork.com/
BTW - I was quite impressed by the Gordon Brown BT advert. Not usually a big fan but he does gravity well. And bringing his family into the equation is an astute move. People can identify with that. And he is post-ambition, unlike King Alex.
Whether all this will be enough, who can say.