Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Spare a thought for the pollsters in the next few days

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited September 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Spare a thought for the pollsters in the next few days

Just a week to go before the big day and there’s one group that’s getting very nervous – the pollsters. This is such a massive election that their final polls will be remembered for years just as now we point to surveys in Quebec in October 1995.

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,376
    Today is the day Westminster lost it's mind.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    SD Glasgow is already clear Yes with TNS, but across Scotland still neck and neck
  • CarolaCarola Posts: 1,805
    This desperate stuff is making me embarrassed to be English.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,376
    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    edited September 2014
    Cameron is of course a member of Clan Cameron through his Scottish father and perfectly entitled to wear a kilt, he is the most Scottish of the 3. Indeed all are hybrids, Clegg from Russian aristocrat stock and Miliband Belgian Jewish. Hopefully they will flesh out more of the devomax proposals together tomorrow as the 3 Scottish party leaders did this morning
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    GIN1138 said:

    Today is the day Westminster lost it's mind.

    And there are still 10 days to go!!!

    What could possibly happen next?
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    GIN1138 said:

    Today is the day Westminster lost it's mind.

    They are making SeanT seem level headed!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578
    Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.

    The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    On Monday night the English could say Federer, Army Knives, Alps, swiss cheese we gave your lads one hell of a beating.

    On the 19th Salmond will be in full flow Maggie Thatcher , Clement Attlee, Winston Churchill your country has taken one hell of a beating 51% to 49%.
  • I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,703
    edited September 2014
    Sitting with a group of a dozen or so "oldies" watching cricket this afternoon. In Essex. General opinion, when Referendum was raised (not by me) was that we were reminded of a utility, phone or insurance company, faced with a client who didn't want to re-sign.

    Shameful behaviour by Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. And definitely counter-productive to take Clegg!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578
    manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    7)Accusations that the scots living abroad who cannot vote/English in Scotland who can have swung it for one side or the other, which is unfair according to the other side.
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    I will LOL if Scotland goes independent.

    I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.
  • GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tempted to vote on how the leaders appeared on television rather than the enormous implications of the decision for the future of your country? Depressing but inevitable how the actual issues have disappeared into the background over the past few days, as personalities have come to the fore.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,534
    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    God help a country that has creatures like Cameron, Clegg, and Milliband as their choices for PM.

  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    welcome @Bazower.

  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    Fenster said:

    I will LOL if Scotland goes independent.

    I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.

    I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578
    edited September 2014
    Sean_F said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    God help a country that has creatures like Cameron, Clegg, and Milliband as their choices for PM.

    No one to blame but ourselves on that one.

    Also, Clegg would likely have a Cleggasm himself at the idea someone included him as a choice for PM.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    edited September 2014
    YorkCity Then the fightback begins if he says that, get rid of Cameron, put Hammond or David Davis in and form a pact with UKIP, Tory/UKIP government and a ruthless approach to negotiations from rUK government, including no currency union under any circumstances
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,376
    edited September 2014
    Sean_F said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    God help a country that has creatures like Cameron, Clegg, and Milliband as their choices for PM.


    Indeed.

    Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Yorkcity said:

    Fenster said:

    I will LOL if Scotland goes independent.

    I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.

    I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.

    I will. I tell thee.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    OKC Many 2011 LDs are undecided according to TSE, seems sensible to take him
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,986
    Evening all :)

    The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.

    Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.

    Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.
  • manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
  • We really are seriously in the mire, if the best candidates for PM are Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. If I was Scottish, and a bit undecided, after today, I'd be draping myself in the Saltire, painting my face blue, and joining the SNP. It's been embarrassing. Westminster politicians have been talking tough since the referendum was announced, but now they're squealing and offering everything, including the kitchen sink. It absolutely stinks that devo-whatever was off the table, but now it's a bit close, Gordon Brown, yes, Gordon effing Brown has crawled out from under his rock to save the union with offers of near-as-damnit indy.

    Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.
  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    edited September 2014
    stodge said:

    Evening all :)

    The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.

    Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.

    Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.

    Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.

    Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    One of the best displays of choreography I've seen in a long time.

    Great fun too. It will help loosen those tensions you've all been feeling lately.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturevideo/tvandradiovideo/11084038/Ohio-State-Marching-Band-pays-tribute-to-Game-of-Thrones-and-The-Office.html
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Until today I thought SeanT's hysteria was a bit over the top. Today's events would seem to prove him right.
  • john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    edited September 2014
    @Yorkcity

    'I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.'

    If it doesn't happen in the next two years then it will in the next five or so years,so better to get it over with now and make a clean break.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    TFS Scottish independence would be a huge boost to Farage, the English nationalist backlash will begin shortly after and he will almost certainly campaign hard on opposition to currency union, and could well hold the balance of power as a result in rUK
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    stodge said:

    Evening all :)

    The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.

    Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.

    Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.

    Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.

    Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
    The RNLI seem to do fine.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,986


    Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.

    Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.

    I shouldn't think that will be at the top of anyone's priorities. The important thing will be the continuation of the horse racing industry. The issue I can see down the road is the taxation policy a Scottish Government might adopt in lieu of bookmaker's profits or turnover. Gambling is and remains a huge potential source of tax revenue for all Governments.

    Greyhound racing in Scotland faces a similar dilemma but one thing I do know about Alex Salmond is he loves his racing and is very knowledgeable about it.

    I once had a conversation with him along the Embankment on one of the strangest nights of my life back in the early 90s.

  • BoabBoab Posts: 13
    edited September 2014
    Fenster said:

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    You haven't really thought this through have you?
    It's called the British Open, but it is organised by the R&A, who are based where?

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11083426/No-need-for-Britain-to-fear-leaving-EU-say-economists.html

    No need for Britain to fear leaving EU, say economists
    Economists say that the idea that millions of jobs would be lost if Britain pulled out of the EU is 'wholly misleading'.
  • tessyCtessyC Posts: 106
    GIN1138 said:



    Indeed.

    Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?

    I guess the rise in the Tory vote share since 1997 is the best guide, from 19% up to 26%, or from 0 seats to 8. Still not back to the 31% in 1983 though.

    In terms of how it is likely to move in the future, this article best explains why Welsh nationalism and possible left wingers may go into decline.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/wales/10878554/Welsh-could-become-a-minority-in-Wales-as-English-set-sights-west.html
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    We really are seriously in the mire, if the best candidates for PM are Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. If I was Scottish, and a bit undecided, after today, I'd be draping myself in the Saltire, painting my face blue, and joining the SNP. It's been embarrassing. Westminster politicians have been talking tough since the referendum was announced, but now they're squealing and offering everything, including the kitchen sink. It absolutely stinks that devo-whatever was off the table, but now it's a bit close, Gordon Brown, yes, Gordon effing Brown has crawled out from under his rock to save the union with offers of near-as-damnit indy.

    Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.

    Greetings TFS!

    I completely agree. Devomax is a can of worms that needs to stay closed. Independence means independence, and if Hammond was the blabbermouth minister that said it was a bluff about currency union then he is not fit to be a negotiator.

    We need a reincarnated Longshanks as our advocate, not some PPE jessie.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,376
    tessyC said:

    GIN1138 said:



    Indeed.

    Did I read a post from you recently that said Wales has become more right-wing over past 30 years as Scotland has gone left? Would be interested to see the polling on that if there is any?

    I guess the rise in the Tory vote share since 1997 is the best guide, from 19% up to 26%, or from 0 seats to 8. Still not back to the 31% in 1983 though.

    In terms of how it is likely to move in the future, this article best explains why Welsh nationalism and possible left wingers may go into decline.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/wales/10878554/Welsh-could-become-a-minority-in-Wales-as-English-set-sights-west.html
    Thanks. :) I hadn't realised this has happened.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Clacton newspaper rails against Matthew Parris, although they've used a photo of the wrong person:

    twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/509262474458050560/photo/1
  • Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    Mike said: "The referendum could make or break reputations"

    That is the risk of being a pollster, but I suspect that they will have a thousand reasons to explain why the result varied so much from their predictions.
  • Just had a heated discussion with some Glaswegian Scots and it is almost impossible to understand what is happening. It appears that the Scots are playing Russian roulette and have loaded the pistol and put it to their head. They are now wondering whether to pull the trigger.

    The panic is scary and gets worse by the hour. It is easy to admire Salmond when the gun is not pointing at your head but a lot harder when your job, money and wealth are all on the line.

    The general agreement was that the best thing that could happen now was the cancellation of the vote until it was clear what the vote was about. My gut feeling is that the weekend has energised the No voters more than the Yes voters. While the No voters were silent before they are now the loudest voices you hear.

    In Glasgow the general sentiment seems to be that voters are lost and going back to their tribes. The Rangers fans will vote No and the Celtic fans will vote Yes. This is not the way to start a bright future for Scotland by reigniting the Auld Firm battles.


  • audreyanneaudreyanne Posts: 1,376
    Boab said:

    Fenster said:

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    You haven't really thought this through have you?
    It's called the British Open, but it is organised by the R&A, who are based where?

    So there will be a bit of unpicking. It's still boring and largely inconsequential. It's not exactly the crisis in Ukraine, Syria or Iraq is it? Some insignificant outpost in the wilds of the British Isles wants to make itself a fully independent state rather than a devolved one.

    Wow. Stop the earth.
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915

    manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
    One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
  • Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256

    The panic is scary and gets worse by the hour. It is easy to admire Salmond when the gun is not pointing at your head but a lot harder when your job, money and wealth are all on the line.

    Are you saying that there is panic north of the border? That we should expect a sudden swing to "No"?

  • GIN1138 said:

    Today is the day Westminster lost it's mind.

    Tipping point.
  • Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    TFS a yes vote might put the Home Secretaries ideas for amalgamating parts of the functions of the Police , Ambulance and Fire on the back burner.

    Having said that I hope it does not, as the Scottish police have already gone to one service.
  • Boab said:

    Fenster said:

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    You haven't really thought this through have you?
    It's called the British Open, but it is organised by the R&A, who are based where?

    It's simply called , The Open Championship. No British in the name.

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    "Laura Kuenssberg @bbclaurak More Saltire news - it is now also flying from the roof of the Treasury building"

    https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=Saltire&s=typd
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    Fox Owen Patterson Might play the Longshanks role quite well, or David Davis, they will have to be as ruthless as possible with the Scots if needed
  • manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
    One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
    Do you know if it is possible to change your mind after posting your postal vote? We have a No voter who now wants to change to Yes.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336

    stodge said:

    Evening all :)

    The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.

    Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.

    Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.

    Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.

    Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
    Well, there's the RNLI, which continued to function in the Saorstat perfectly well, and carries on in Ireland just as it does in the UK.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    FPT:

    "Ed Miliband has urged towns and cities across the United Kingdom to fly the Saltire in an attempt to encourage Scottish voters to stay in the union. Miliband, who raised the flag in Liverpool this morning with the city’s mayor, wants the rest of the UK to remind Scotland what they’ll be missing.

    Miliband said: “Over the next few days we want cities, towns and villages across the UK to send a message to Scotland: stay with us. We want to see the Saltire flying above buildings all across our country.”"

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/09/are-you-heeding-ed-milibands-call-to-fly-the-saltire-across-the-uk-scotland-independence
  • HYUFD said:

    SD Glasgow is already clear Yes with TNS, but across Scotland still neck and neck

    Indeed. But just an unweighted sub-sample.

    I meant if Glasgow actually casts its votes clearly for Yes.
  • BoabBoab Posts: 13

    It's simply called , The Open Championship. No British in the name.

    Well quite, that was half the point, it gets called that, but it isn't.
    I doubt the R&A would be as small-minded as Fenster, and to stop it being held outside of Scotland.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
    One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
    Apparently the American solution has been adopted: ie. anyone in the queue at 10pm will be allowed to vote. You don't have to be inside the polling station, which was the case at the 2010 general election.
  • Ladbrokes - The Queen to officially back the NO campaign

    *** SUSPENDED ***
  • manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
    One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
    Let's hope the queue is not in Stornoway.
  • Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.

    Why shouldn't Salmond milk it? The effete Westminster elite have played right into his hands today.

  • Carola said:

    This desperate stuff is making me embarrassed to be English.

    Tipping point.
  • GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tipping point.

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tipping point.

    Ah yes back to the inevitability of communism argument.

    It didn't happen.
  • GIN1138 said:

    Today is the day Westminster lost it's mind.

    And there are still 10 days to go!!!

    What could possibly happen next?
    The mind boggles.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336

    Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.

    Given the demonization of the poor man over the last few years by UK pols and media (google Dictator Bingo), common justice dictates that he's certainly entitled to one or two very small jabs in return. Indeed, David Cameron not so long ago made a very public and very unpleasant personal joke when meeting him, of the kind that would have been a diplomatic disaster the day after indy day. (I won't repeat it as I can't recall the exact wording, but it was a 'count the spoons after he's visited' sort of jibe.)

    Indeed it may well be seen that one of the disastrous mistakes of BT was to obsess with Mr Salmond, and to focus on the man and equate the entire Yes movement with the SNP and then with him, to the degree that they completely lost depth of focus as to what has actually been happening.

    And I'm neither a SNP member nor an uncritical observer of the chap.

  • audreyanneaudreyanne Posts: 1,376

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tipping point.

    Are there several of these then?
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915
    HYUFD said:

    Cameron is of course a member of Clan Cameron through his Scottish father and perfectly entitled to wear a kilt, he is the most Scottish of the 3. Indeed all are hybrids, Clegg from Russian aristocrat stock and Miliband Belgian Jewish. Hopefully they will flesh out more of the devomax proposals together tomorrow as the 3 Scottish party leaders did this morning

    Cameron's Scottish lineage is far stronger than the vast majority of the YES folks who shout about Braveheart and the English. His father is from Aberdeenshire. His mother's grandmother was Lady Agnes Duff, daughter of the 5th Earl of Fife and granddaughter of the 18th Earl of Errol. Through those 2 he is descended from most of Scotland's oldest aristocratic families. Through the Countess of Errol he is of course a direct descendant of James VI and I and through that link a distant cousin of yours truly.

    Anyone who is part of the extended family of Easterross has to be of fine Scottish lineage. If I'm not mistaken he is also a cousin of both mine and NPXMP through the Earls of Moray.
  • GIN1138 said:

    Today is the day Westminster lost it's mind.

    They are making SeanT seem level headed!
    Tipping point.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    Carnyx said:

    Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.

    Given the demonization of the poor man over the last few years by UK pols and media (google Dictator Bingo), common justice dictates that he's certainly entitled to one or two very small jabs in return. Indeed, David Cameron not so long ago made a very public and very unpleasant personal joke when meeting him, of the kind that would have been a diplomatic disaster the day after indy day. (I won't repeat it as I can't recall the exact wording, but it was a 'count the spoons after he's visited' sort of jibe.)

    Indeed it may well be seen that one of the disastrous mistakes of BT was to obsess with Mr Salmond, and to focus on the man and equate the entire Yes movement with the SNP and then with him, to the degree that they completely lost depth of focus as to what has actually been happening.

    And I'm neither a SNP member nor an uncritical observer of the chap.

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336

    manfrom said:

    I guess the one thing that was absolutely inevitable about the polls in the final few days was that they'd tighten significantly.

    We can now look forward a whole host of "on the day" inevitibilities

    1) Bad weather (decreases turnout of older voters)
    2) Students not back/back early
    3) Queues at polling stations past 10pm (a la 2010)
    4) At least one accusation of vote rigging, most likely concerned with postal votes
    5) Accusations of voter intimidation at polling stations
    6) A massive recount if it's remotely close

    3) has I think been defused. Anyone in the queue at 10 will be able to vote no matter how long it takes.
    One of my friends is to be in charge of a local polling station. He and his colleagues have been given tutorials about how to deal with queues at 10pm, people turning up with postal votes etc etc. The Returning Officer has appointed a flying squad of officials who can attend any polling station in a short period to deal with any issues on the spot if necessary.
    Let's hope the queue is not in Stornoway.
    More likely to be outside the chippie or butcher. Stornoway black pudding, yum!

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    HYUFD said:

    SD Glasgow is already clear Yes with TNS, but across Scotland still neck and neck

    Indeed. But just an unweighted sub-sample.

    I meant if Glasgow actually casts its votes clearly for Yes.
    My guess is Glasgow will be very slightly more pro-Yes than average, by about 2-3 points maybe. Edinburgh, the reverse.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    john_zims said:

    @Yorkcity

    'I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.'

    If it doesn't happen in the next two years then it will in the next five or so years,so better to get it over with now and make a clean break.

    John reluctantly I think you are correct.
    However I do not think the markets are going to just wait years after a yes vote, for politicians leisurely to discuss this by 2016.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,954

    The general agreement was that the best thing that could happen now was the cancellation of the vote until it was clear what the vote was about.

    It's too late to stop, but I completely agree that it's madness that in 10 days time the vote will be over, but we'll have no real idea what it all means.

    The most important decision in this country for a very long time and what will happen? Salmond doesn't know and has been bluffing from the start, the three monkey plainly haven't prepared, and now Brown is busy proposing to rip up our constitution without any consultation of the vast majority of UK citizens.

    It's a farce, and our politicians are plumbing new depths almost by the hour.
  • Salmond shamelessly milking it today with his claim that Cameron would inevitably have to resign in the event of a yes vote. There just can't be any doubt about it as far as he's concerned - nothing to do with the fact that he thinks the prospect of his resignation would be worth another few percentage on the yes vote.

    Why shouldn't Salmond milk it? The effete Westminster elite have played right into his hands today.

    One of the best descriptions of him I've heard is that he looks so pleased with himself that he'd drink his own bathwater (alternative beverages can be substituted here ...). Undeniably, a formidable politician, though.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    We really are seriously in the mire, if the best candidates for PM are Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. If I was Scottish, and a bit undecided, after today, I'd be draping myself in the Saltire, painting my face blue, and joining the SNP. It's been embarrassing. Westminster politicians have been talking tough since the referendum was announced, but now they're squealing and offering everything, including the kitchen sink. It absolutely stinks that devo-whatever was off the table, but now it's a bit close, Gordon Brown, yes, Gordon effing Brown has crawled out from under his rock to save the union with offers of near-as-damnit indy.

    Scotland, please, please vote yes, so that the whole rotten gang can implode during the recriminations after you do.

    Agree.

  • kle4 said:

    Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.

    The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.

    Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
  • Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.

    If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.

    1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat.
    2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt.
    3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible.
    4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round.
    5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.

    Really lovely prospect.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    SD It almost certainly will, TNS had the Highlands and Islands, Glasgow, Western Scotland and Central Scotland with a Yes lead even when across Scotland it was tied with No a fraction ahead. The South and Borders, Lothian, Mid Scotland and Fife and North East Scotland had No in the lead http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11082964/Scottish-independence-New-poll-shows-battle-for-Union-neck-and-neck.html
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    kle4 said:

    Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.

    The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.

    Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
    chortle

    I think that will be pretty mild stuff if its a yes.
  • Ouch - that should read

    Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.

    If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.

    1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat.
    2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt.
    3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible.
    4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round.
    5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.

    Really lovely prospect.

    Ouch - that should read in event of Yes vote. (Must check before I post in future!)
  • Sitting with a group of a dozen or so "oldies" watching cricket this afternoon. In Essex. General opinion, when Referendum was raised (not by me) was that we were reminded of a utility, phone or insurance company, faced with a client who didn't want to re-sign.

    Shameful behaviour by Cameron, Milliband and Clegg. And definitely counter-productive to take Clegg!

    Tipping point.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.

    If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.

    1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat.
    2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt.
    3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible.
    4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round.
    5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.

    Really lovely prospect.

    5 Scotland will get vetoed by UK on EU membership unitl it settles its debts - why wouldn't we ?
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Boab said:

    Fenster said:

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    You haven't really thought this through have you?
    It's called the British Open, but it is organised by the R&A, who are based where?

    I know. I was being a little bit facetious. The Open announcer, with that thick Scottish drawl, is a bit of a giveaway.

    I guess Scotland will still be part of the 'British' Isles anyway.

  • alexalex Posts: 244

    kle4 said:

    Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.

    The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.

    Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
    For all until about 4 days ago this was supposed to be a debate within Scotland where "foreigners" weren't welcome. So it's an interesting definition of "jock" that excludes half of Scotland. The reason all of what is going on now looks horribly desperate is because the UK establishment have belatedly decided that they aren't ambivalent to Scotland leaving and want to get involved with only 10 days to go. A bit late really.
  • Bazowzer said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tempted to vote on how the leaders appeared on television rather than the enormous implications of the decision for the future of your country? Depressing but inevitable how the actual issues have disappeared into the background over the past few days, as personalities have come to the fore.
    Ho ho. Unionists spent the entire campaign slagging off Salmond. Glass houses and stones.
  • Sean_F said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    God help a country that has creatures like Cameron, Clegg, and Milliband as their choices for PM.

    Tipping point.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    edited September 2014
    Mike: "which is why ICM down-weights by 50% those who did vote in the previous election"

    Is there a missing NOT in that phrase?

    i.e. "those who did NOT vote..."
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    Bazowzer said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tempted to vote on how the leaders appeared on television rather than the enormous implications of the decision for the future of your country? Depressing but inevitable how the actual issues have disappeared into the background over the past few days, as personalities have come to the fore.
    Ho ho. Unionists spent the entire campaign slagging off Salmond. Glass houses and stones.
    is there any reason to stop ? his economics are a disaster waiting to happen.

  • alex said:

    kle4 said:

    Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.

    The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.

    Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
    For all until about 4 days ago this was supposed to be a debate within Scotland where "foreigners" weren't welcome. So it's an interesting definition of "jock" that excludes half of Scotland. The reason all of what is going on now looks horribly desperate is because the UK establishment have belatedly decided that they aren't ambivalent to Scotland leaving and want to get involved with only 10 days to go. A bit late really.
    Tipping point.
  • Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.

    If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.

    1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat.
    2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt.
    3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible.
    4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round.
    5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.

    Really lovely prospect.

    5 Scotland will get vetoed by UK on EU membership unitl it settles its debts - why wouldn't we ?
    UK won't need to. Spain will be happy to oblige.
  • Yorkcity said:

    Fenster said:

    I will LOL if Scotland goes independent.

    I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.

    I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.

    Project Fear relaunch No.2038

    Puhrleeese.
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Boab said:

    It's simply called , The Open Championship. No British in the name.

    Well quite, that was half the point, it gets called that, but it isn't.
    I doubt the R&A would be as small-minded as Fenster, and to stop it being held outside of Scotland.
    Lol, reel them in. Nothing is quite as easy as winding up a cybernat.

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    Mike: "which is why ICM down-weights by 50% those who did vote in the previous election"

    Is there a missing NOT in that phrase?

    i.e. "those who did NOT vote..."

    Tippex point ;-)
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    Yorkcity said:

    Fenster said:

    I will LOL if Scotland goes independent.

    I couldn't care less either way, but it would be funny to see Labour lose all those safe seats.

    The biggest drawback for me would be no more (British) Open Championships at St Andrews, Muirfield or Troon.

    The collective face of the establishment would be funny to witness the day afterwards. As would the faces of Scots a few weeks later when all the wealthy and clever people start to leave. LOL indeed, all round.

    I don`t think you will be laughing if the ruk taxpayers in the next two years have to bail Scotland out and the B of E has to start issuing guarantees.

    Project Fear relaunch No.2038

    Puhrleeese.
    Tipping point
  • alexalex Posts: 244
    Is there anywhere you can get a bet on the population of Scotland in 5 years time?
  • stodge said:

    Evening all :)

    The problem though is that some individuals have worked themselves into a state of hyperbolic panic, stick their half-baked fear-driven rantings on Facebook or Twitter and spread the panic that bit further.

    Take one tiny corner...Scottish horse racing. The five Scottish racetracks were all panicking about the ramifications of a YES vote - the problem was no one had told them that since the Ulster tracks of Down Royal and Downpatrick function perfectly adequately under the auspices of Horse Racing Ireland, so the Scottish tracks can continue to operate under the British Horseracing Authority. The media rights agreements cover all tracks irrespective of where they are because they are agreed with the track owners.

    Panic over - life goes on. As with much else, it's easy to assume the worst but with a scintilla of thought, the worst can be easily avoided.

    Would the British Horseracing Authority have to become the "British and Scottish Horseracing Authority" though? Indeed, I can't believe for one minute that post-independence the euphoric Nats would stand for anything with "British" in the title having jurisdiction over anything Scottish.

    Slowly but surely, anything "British" or a relic of the Union would be purged. I doubt there's much in the Republic that bears lasting testiment to our former union.
    https://www.ria.ie/

    http://www.royalcork.com/
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    Interesting developments. What they will demonstrate, in the event of a No vote, is that this is very much Scotland suing for the divorce. RUK is practically begging Scotland to stay in the relationship. The fall-out, which will undoubtedly be bad economically, will be Scotland's responsibility and her responsibility alone. It will mean that there will be absolutely no need for the RUK to have any compunction about driving an extremely hard deal. Rejected suitors tend to react badly.

    If the politicians do what they say they are going to do, the following will happen.

    1) Scottish request for a currency union will be turned down flat.
    2) Salmond will renege on Scotland's share of national debt.
    3) Huge market turbulence will damage everyone and the Scottish "transition" via the Panama model will look completely impossible.
    4) Scotland will have to establish central bank and own currency in the worst possible consequences. Austerity all-round.
    5) Scotland will sue for entry to Europe and adoption of Euro in the worst possible of all circumstances.

    Really lovely prospect.

    5 Scotland will get vetoed by UK on EU membership unitl it settles its debts - why wouldn't we ?
    I suspect that we wouldn't because for all the initial reaction will probably include a lot of bitter people, me included, who won't want to give Scotland an inch, a strong Scotland is good for rUK. I don't think that means they will get all they want as the Yes side suggest, I think they put too much faith in people a) acting rationally b) agreeing that the rational approach is the one they support, c) the complexity of what they are asking for, but I do think rUK will be making a great many accomodations to a new Scottish state in fairly short order.
  • audreyanneaudreyanne Posts: 1,376

    alex said:

    kle4 said:

    Given the sudden shifting to Yes, it seems like plenty of people who were DKs were actually shy Yes's, given that the arguments in recent months have been the same old stuff.

    The desperation of No is pretty hard to take, but I can just about accept it. Trying to be rational, or sneering, or convincing, has not worked. Desperate pleading is about all that can be managed at this point.

    Bit nauseating though. After all their Jock-bashing.
    For all until about 4 days ago this was supposed to be a debate within Scotland where "foreigners" weren't welcome. So it's an interesting definition of "jock" that excludes half of Scotland. The reason all of what is going on now looks horribly desperate is because the UK establishment have belatedly decided that they aren't ambivalent to Scotland leaving and want to get involved with only 10 days to go. A bit late really.
    Tipping point.
    How many more 'tipping points' do we have to endure before you lot finish deciding? I think we should be warned.
  • Mike: "which is why ICM down-weights by 50% those who did vote in the previous election"

    Is there a missing NOT in that phrase?

    i.e. "those who did NOT vote..."

    Yeah, I fixed it now
  • BTW - for all the talk of momentum etc., I still can't help feeling that the older voters will be unmoved by all this stuff. And that unlike the frothier nationalists are likely to take the impending visit of the three UK leaders at face value, ie, legitimate expression of extreme concern at hugely significant vote. The impression the Nats give is that they are having a laugh - not a good impression to give.

    BTW - I was quite impressed by the Gordon Brown BT advert. Not usually a big fan but he does gravity well. And bringing his family into the equation is an astute move. People can identify with that. And he is post-ambition, unlike King Alex.

    Whether all this will be enough, who can say.
  • HYUFD said:

    Cameron is of course a member of Clan Cameron through his Scottish father and perfectly entitled to wear a kilt, he is the most Scottish of the 3. Indeed all are hybrids, Clegg from Russian aristocrat stock and Miliband Belgian Jewish. Hopefully they will flesh out more of the devomax proposals together tomorrow as the 3 Scottish party leaders did this morning

    Cameron's Scottish lineage is far stronger than the vast majority of the YES folks who shout about Braveheart and the English. His father is from Aberdeenshire. His mother's grandmother was Lady Agnes Duff, daughter of the 5th Earl of Fife and granddaughter of the 18th Earl of Errol. Through those 2 he is descended from most of Scotland's oldest aristocratic families. Through the Countess of Errol he is of course a direct descendant of James VI and I and through that link a distant cousin of yours truly.

    Anyone who is part of the extended family of Easterross has to be of fine Scottish lineage. If I'm not mistaken he is also a cousin of both mine and NPXMP through the Earls of Moray.
    Interesting. It's really surprising that he's not made more of his lineage ...
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    GIN1138 said:

    I've got admit, I quite like Alex Salmond. Saw him on the news tonight looking calm, relaxed, confident even cracking a joke.

    Compare that to the shower that is Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. If I lived in Scotland I'd be tempted I must admit...

    Tipping point.

    Are there several of these then?
    Yes from below it is a tip and run strategy.

This discussion has been closed.