Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Now the betting money moves to an IndyRef YES – up in a wee

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited August 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Now the betting money moves to an IndyRef YES – up in a week from 14.2% chance to a 25% one

Make no mistake – this is a massive day in the Scottish IndyRef Campaign. For tonight the First Minister of Scotland takes on the leader of “Better Together” the former UK chancellor, Alistair Darling, in a two hour long live TV debate.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    First!
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    Thirth!
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg have signed a joint declaration that promises more financial powers for Scotland if it rejects independence.

    The move by the leaders of the three main parties is an attempt to rubbish claims by Alex Salmond that Westminster will not deliver more devolution if Scots vote ‘no’.

    The unprecedented joint declaration comes on the day of a TV debate between Scottish First Minister Mr Salmond and Alistair Darling, the former Labour Chancellor who fronts the pro-union Better Together campaign.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2716157/Party-leaders-agree-let-Scots-set-taxes-Move-attempt-rubbish-Salmonds-claims-Westminster-not-offer-powers-following-no-vote.html
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Latest ARSE 2015 General Election and JackW Dozen Projections Countdown

    3 hours 3 minutes 3 seconds
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    Latest YouGov / The Sun results 4th August - Con 34%, Lab 38%, LD 6%, UKIP 13%; Green 4, APP -21
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976

    Four pundits on Salmond vs Darling:

    It would appear that irrespective of the participant deemed the ‘winner’, all four pundits agree tonight's debate will not be a game changer. - must admit that short of a complete psychotic meltdown by one or the other, I’m inclined to agree.
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    YouGov

    LD 2010 split:

    Cons:18
    LAB: 34
    LD: 24
    UKIP: 12
    Green: 8
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Financier said:

    YouGov

    LD 2010 split:

    Cons:18
    LAB: 34
    LD: 24
    UKIP: 12
    Green: 8

    Retaining only a quarter of previous support is pretty grim. I yearn for some LD swingback.

    But like the Yes campaign, we are running out of time and ideas.

    Despite me being a Cleggite Orange Booker, I think we need an LD leadership election this autumn.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,698

    Financier said:

    YouGov

    LD 2010 split:

    Cons:18
    LAB: 34
    LD: 24
    UKIP: 12
    Green: 8

    Retaining only a quarter of previous support is pretty grim. I yearn for some LD swingback.

    But like the Yes campaign, we are running out of time and ideas.

    Despite me being a Cleggite Orange Booker, I think we need an LD leadership election this autumn.
    As a Red Liberal, I agree.
  • This is NOT a good camera angle for Ruth Davidson's legs. Must bookmark this and post whenever Cyberbritnats whine on about Salmond's weight.

    Cameron, Miliband and Clegg sign up for more Scottish powers ahead of TV debate
    - The Prime Minister, his deputy and the Labour leader sign up to a declaration promising further devolution in an attempt to spike Alex Salmond's guns only hours before he contests the first independence referendum TV debate with Alistair Darling

    Scotland will be allowed to set its own levels of income tax and benefits if the country rejects independence, David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg will announce today in an unprecedented joint declaration before tonight’s television debate.

    ... Although bookmakers have made the First Minister clear favourite to win, they have said this does not seem to be filtering through into more punters backing a Yes vote.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11011773/Cameron-Miliband-and-Clegg-sign-up-for-more-Scottish-powers-ahead-of-TV-debate.html
  • The Scottish Tories are huge winners from the Better Together campaign. Scottish Labour are getting thumped by their decision to not just hop into bed with the Tories but to shag them like bunnies. It is clear which partner is on top.

    Populus
    Westminster voting intention - Scotland
    Sub-sample size = 181
    (+/- change from UK GE 2010)

    Lab 32% (-10)
    SNP 28% (+8)
    Con 26% (+9)
    LD 8% (-11)
    UKIP 4% (+3)
    Grn 2% (+1)
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.
  • Financier said:

    YouGov

    LD 2010 split:

    Cons:18
    LAB: 34
    LD: 24
    UKIP: 12
    Green: 8

    Retaining only a quarter of previous support is pretty grim. I yearn for some LD swingback.

    But like the Yes campaign, we are running out of time and ideas.

    Despite me being a Cleggite Orange Booker, I think we need an LD leadership election this autumn.
    Extremely poor analogy.

    If, 10 years ago, a PBer had predicted that in the summer of 2014 the Liberal Democrats would regularly be sub 10% whereas support for Scottish independence would regularly be in the mid 40s then they would have faced a torrent of arrogant abuse.

    Short-termism is a crippling attribute. Look at the big picture.
  • TGOHF said:

    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.

    Polls are not the only parameter. Out of several others you must remember that large numbers of ground troops, on both sides, are privy to canvassing results. Some of the ones I have seen are truly mindblowing, especially in C2DE areas. If YES can get these people out to vote then the world is facing a black swan event.

    (Note: even if the polls are accurate, the current Betfair prices represent vast value for Yes backers, simply because the prices pay little heed to the closeness of the polling.)

  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276

    TGOHF said:

    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.

    (Note: even if the polls are accurate, the current Betfair prices represent vast value for Yes backers, simply because the prices pay little heed to the closeness of the polling.)

    The polling isn't remotely close, there is a solid and consistent lead for "no", the prices reflect this very well
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.

    (Note: even if the polls are accurate, the current Betfair prices represent vast value for Yes backers, simply because the prices pay little heed to the closeness of the polling.)

    The polling isn't remotely close, there is a solid and consistent lead for "no", the prices reflect this very well
    Plus Jacks ARSE shows yes well below even 40%..

    Still at least it will be over soon...
  • Ex-William Hill Chief Backs Scottish Yes Vote
    - Ralph Topping, who ran the UK's biggest bookmaker, will publicly back the Scottish 'Yes' campaign on Tuesday

    http://news.sky.com/story/1313028/ex-william-hill-chief-backs-scottish-yes-vote
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited August 2014

    Ex-William Hill Chief Backs Scottish Yes Vote
    - Ralph Topping, who ran the UK's biggest bookmaker, will publicly back the Scottish 'Yes' campaign on Tuesday

    http://news.sky.com/story/1313028/ex-william-hill-chief-backs-scottish-yes-vote

    So what? Who cares? I am sure for every person like that there are two who don't.. The whole thing is becoming a huge yawnfest.
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916

    The Scottish Tories are huge winners from the Better Together campaign. Scottish Labour are getting thumped by their decision to not just hop into bed with the Tories but to shag them like bunnies. It is clear which partner is on top.

    Populus
    Westminster voting intention - Scotland
    Sub-sample size = 181
    (+/- change from UK GE 2010)

    Lab 32% (-10)
    SNP 28% (+8)
    Con 26% (+9)
    LD 8% (-11)
    UKIP 4% (+3)
    Grn 2% (+1)

    Today's YouGov, also Westminster VI, sub-sample size = 141

    LAB: 40
    SNP:33
    Con: 16
    LD: 4
    UKIP: 2
    Grn: 5

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Ex-William Hill Chief Backs Scottish Yes Vote
    - Ralph Topping, who ran the UK's biggest bookmaker, will publicly back the Scottish 'Yes' campaign on Tuesday

    http://news.sky.com/story/1313028/ex-william-hill-chief-backs-scottish-yes-vote

    Is that the same Mr Topping who has overseen a disasterous period for Scottish football where the league doesn't even have a sponsor ?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014

    TGOHF said:

    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.

    Polls are not the only parameter. Out of several others you must remember that large numbers of ground troops, on both sides, are privy to canvassing results. Some of the ones I have seen are truly mindblowing, especially in C2DE areas. If YES can get these people out to vote then the world is facing a black swan event.

    (Note: even if the polls are accurate, the current Betfair prices represent vast value for Yes backers, simply because the prices pay little heed to the closeness of the polling.)

    Have you done any canvassing Stuart? I have been out a few times and only in Carnoustie was the result close. And frankly if the result is close in Carnoustie then Yes have got a problem. Interestingly that was a more affluent area than the C2DE areas you are talking about.

    I don't expect tonight to change very much. In fact it is increasingly difficult to think of anything much that is going to change things. Salmond is recalling Parliament today so it would not surprise me if he has thought of another couple of give aways but the fact he can apparently do this in the Union rather undermines the point of it all.



  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496

    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.

    Tomkins is not a thoughtful contributor, he is an out and out unionist who believes in Britain and rule by London elite is the only way. All the claptrap he comes out with applies at least as much if we stay shackled to Westminster. Things are not well and will get worse in the union that is a certainty, who knows in independence.
    It is easy for the likes of Tomkins on a six figure salary , gold plated pension and friend of the elite who run the show to pontificate and wonder why the peasants are not eating cake.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496

    David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg have signed a joint declaration that promises more financial powers for Scotland if it rejects independence.

    The move by the leaders of the three main parties is an attempt to rubbish claims by Alex Salmond that Westminster will not deliver more devolution if Scots vote ‘no’.

    The unprecedented joint declaration comes on the day of a TV debate between Scottish First Minister Mr Salmond and Alistair Darling, the former Labour Chancellor who fronts the pro-union Better Together campaign.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2716157/Party-leaders-agree-let-Scots-set-taxes-Move-attempt-rubbish-Salmonds-claims-Westminster-not-offer-powers-following-no-vote.html

    Ha Ha Ha , will that be like previous declarations that they have signed. Not even useful as toilet paper.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.

    (Note: even if the polls are accurate, the current Betfair prices represent vast value for Yes backers, simply because the prices pay little heed to the closeness of the polling.)

    The polling isn't remotely close, there is a solid and consistent lead for "no", the prices reflect this very well
    Plus Jacks ARSE shows yes well below even 40%..

    Still at least it will be over soon...
    An ARSE is an ARSE however , and this one is a big floppy one
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496

    Ex-William Hill Chief Backs Scottish Yes Vote
    - Ralph Topping, who ran the UK's biggest bookmaker, will publicly back the Scottish 'Yes' campaign on Tuesday

    http://news.sky.com/story/1313028/ex-william-hill-chief-backs-scottish-yes-vote

    So what? Who cares? I am sure for every person like that there are two who don't.. The whole thing is becoming a huge yawnfest.
    compared to the daily frothing on here over which of two losers might win the next GE at Westminster you have to be joking
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    DavidL said:

    TGOHF said:

    Polls haven't tightened so must be heart over head punters.

    Polls are not the only parameter. Out of several others you must remember that large numbers of ground troops, on both sides, are privy to canvassing results. Some of the ones I have seen are truly mindblowing, especially in C2DE areas. If YES can get these people out to vote then the world is facing a black swan event.

    (Note: even if the polls are accurate, the current Betfair prices represent vast value for Yes backers, simply because the prices pay little heed to the closeness of the polling.)

    Have you done any canvassing Stuart? I have been out a few times and only in Carnoustie was the result close. And frankly if the result is close in Carnoustie then Yes have got a problem. Interestingly that was a more affluent area than the C2DE areas you are talking about.

    I don't expect tonight to change very much. In fact it is increasingly difficult to think of anything much that is going to change things. Salmond is recalling Parliament today so it would not surprise me if he has thought of another couple of give aways but the fact he can apparently do this in the Union rather undermines the point of it all.



    David, you should not base everything on Morningside.
  • This is NOT a good camera angle for Ruth Davidson's legs. Must bookmark this and post whenever Cyberbritnats whine on about Salmond's weight.

    Cameron, Miliband and Clegg sign up for more Scottish powers ahead of TV debate
    - The Prime Minister, his deputy and the Labour leader sign up to a declaration promising further devolution in an attempt to spike Alex Salmond's guns only hours before he contests the first independence referendum TV debate with Alistair Darling

    Scotland will be allowed to set its own levels of income tax and benefits if the country rejects independence, David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg will announce today in an unprecedented joint declaration before tonight’s television debate.

    ... Although bookmakers have made the First Minister clear favourite to win, they have said this does not seem to be filtering through into more punters backing a Yes vote.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11011773/Cameron-Miliband-and-Clegg-sign-up-for-more-Scottish-powers-ahead-of-TV-debate.html

    The wee Swedish inadequate showing his customary level of gallantry.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Good morning, everyone.

    Miss DiCanio, those tax moves will either be meaningless or lead to the break-up of the union (unless an English Parliament with commensurate powers is established). We can't have Scottish voters having MPs able to vote on taxation rates that won't apply to Scotland but will to England.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Latest ARSE 2015 General Election & JackW Projections Countdown

    40 minutes
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    LATEST WEEKLY BJESUS

    5.8.14 LAB 330 (332) CON 262(260) LD 34(34) UKIP 0(0) Others 24 (Ed is crap is PM)
    Last weeks BJESUS in brackets
    BJESUS (Big John Election Service Uniform Swing)
    Using current polling adjusted for 274 days left to go factor and using UKPR standard swingometer
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    GO talking about the debate on R4 now..
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    edited August 2014

    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.

    It is a very good piece and nicely nails the idea that the referendum is a battle between ScotNats and BritNats.

    Bateman exemplifies one of the Nationalists’ greatest deficiencies in the referendum campaign: so blinkered are they by the ferocity of their own nationalism that they cannot see that their opponents are not themselves nationalist in outlook. This is not “Scotnat v Britnat”, a battle of competing nationalisms. It is Nationalism v Unionism, a battle between those who say “a nation cannot fully exist until it is a state” and those who say “don’t be so daft”. The argument is not Scotland versus Britain — are you Scottish or British. The argument is Scotland separated from Britain or Scotland within a United Kingdom: Scotland alone or Scotland as part of a family of great British nations.

    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496

    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.

    It is a very good piece and nicely nails the idea that the referendum is a battle between ScotNats and BritNats.

    Bateman exemplifies one of the Nationalists’ greatest deficiencies in the referendum campaign: so blinkered are they by the ferocity of their own nationalism that they cannot see that their opponents are not themselves nationalist in outlook. This is not “Scotnat v Britnat”, a battle of competing nationalisms. It is Nationalism v Unionism, a battle between those who say “a nation cannot fully exist until it is a state” and those who say “don’t be so daft”. The argument is not Scotland versus Britain — are you Scottish or British. The argument is Scotland separated from Britain or Scotland within a United Kingdom: Scotland alone or Scotland as part of a family of great British nations.

    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    Go read the white paper
  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915
    Morning all and looking forward to Eck v Eyebrows this evening. Only weak spot is Bernard Ponsonby who is the host at STV. He is about the weakest of all TV political editors.

    The polls will become interesting once the Scottish schools return a fortnight today and life in Scotland returns to normal.
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Dyedwoolie prediction update
    SIndy - yes 49 no 51, race tightening
    GE -
    Con 290
    Lab 295
    Lib 27
    UKIP 4
    Green 2
    NI and Nats 32 (SNP to gain 4-5)
    Minoroty government under Ed Miliband, back to the polls in 6 months
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    edited August 2014

    Morning all and looking forward to Eck v Eyebrows this evening. Only weak spot is Bernard Ponsonby who is the host at STV. He is about the weakest of all TV political editors.

    The polls will become interesting once the Scottish schools return a fortnight today and life in Scotland returns to normal.

    Easterross, he is still streets ahead of anybody left at the BBC.

    PS: and without the EBC bias as well.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    The health secretary has announced a “managed breach” of key waiting times targets for several months while the service treats extra patients to tackle its backlog.

    The most recent elective performance figures, for May, revealed the English waiting list had exceeded 3m, for the first time since March 2008.

    So an extra 500,000 patients waiting over 18 weeks since Lansley gave all the money to GPs to commission health.
  • malcolmg said:

    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.

    It is a very good piece and nicely nails the idea that the referendum is a battle between ScotNats and BritNats.

    Bateman exemplifies one of the Nationalists’ greatest deficiencies in the referendum campaign: so blinkered are they by the ferocity of their own nationalism that they cannot see that their opponents are not themselves nationalist in outlook. This is not “Scotnat v Britnat”, a battle of competing nationalisms. It is Nationalism v Unionism, a battle between those who say “a nation cannot fully exist until it is a state” and those who say “don’t be so daft”. The argument is not Scotland versus Britain — are you Scottish or British. The argument is Scotland separated from Britain or Scotland within a United Kingdom: Scotland alone or Scotland as part of a family of great British nations.

    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    Go read the white paper
    Could you refer me to the paragraph or paragraphs in the White Paper that deal with the points raised by Bateman? Thanks in advance.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Mr. Owls, is that better or worse than Wales?
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    edited August 2014

    malcolmg said:

    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.

    It is a very good piece and nicely nails the idea that the referendum is a battle between ScotNats and BritNats.

    Bateman exemplifies one of the Nationalists’ greatest deficiencies in the referendum campaign: so blinkered are they by the ferocity of their own nationalism that they cannot see that their opponents are not themselves nationalist in outlook. This is not “Scotnat v Britnat”, a battle of competing nationalisms. It is Nationalism v Unionism, a battle between those who say “a nation cannot fully exist until it is a state” and those who say “don’t be so daft”. The argument is not Scotland versus Britain — are you Scottish or British. The argument is Scotland separated from Britain or Scotland within a United Kingdom: Scotland alone or Scotland as part of a family of great British nations.

    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    Go read the white paper
    Could you refer me to the paragraph or paragraphs in the White Paper that deal with the points raised by Bateman? Thanks in advance.
    Go read , what did your last servant die of.
    http://derekbateman.co.uk/
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496

    malcolmg said:

    Posted before, but Prof Tomkins is a thoughtful contributor from the Unionist persuasion:

    Yet you would not know this from the vast majority of the SNP’s and Yes Scotland’s campaign literature. So much of the campaign for independence has focused on issues other than independence that you really do sometimes wonder if Yes know what they are arguing for at all. On the campaign trail I’ve heard more about austerity, food banks, and the bedroom tax than I have about independence, as if an independent Scotland would not have to worry about balancing the budget, tackling welfare dependency, or making work pay.

    http://notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    Oh, and second, like the Separatists on September 19.

    It is a very good piece and nicely nails the idea that the referendum is a battle between ScotNats and BritNats.

    Bateman exemplifies one of the Nationalists’ greatest deficiencies in the referendum campaign: so blinkered are they by the ferocity of their own nationalism that they cannot see that their opponents are not themselves nationalist in outlook. This is not “Scotnat v Britnat”, a battle of competing nationalisms. It is Nationalism v Unionism, a battle between those who say “a nation cannot fully exist until it is a state” and those who say “don’t be so daft”. The argument is not Scotland versus Britain — are you Scottish or British. The argument is Scotland separated from Britain or Scotland within a United Kingdom: Scotland alone or Scotland as part of a family of great British nations.

    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    Go read the white paper
    Could you refer me to the paragraph or paragraphs in the White Paper that deal with the points raised by Bateman? Thanks in advance.
    Go read , what did your last servant die of.
  • Financier said:

    The Scottish Tories are huge winners from the Better Together campaign. Scottish Labour are getting thumped by their decision to not just hop into bed with the Tories but to shag them like bunnies. It is clear which partner is on top.

    Populus
    Westminster voting intention - Scotland
    Sub-sample size = 181
    (+/- change from UK GE 2010)

    Lab 32% (-10)
    SNP 28% (+8)
    Con 26% (+9)
    LD 8% (-11)
    UKIP 4% (+3)
    Grn 2% (+1)

    Today's YouGov, also Westminster VI, sub-sample size = 141

    LAB: 40
    SNP:33
    Con: 16
    LD: 4
    UKIP: 2
    Grn: 5

    That'll be the same YouGov that predicted a win for Scottish Labour at the recent Euros. Only two days before voting took place. Epic fail.




  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS ****

    The breaking news is that WIND is reporting to the JNN the contents of the latest ARSE 2015 General Election and "JackW Dozen" Projections. (Change from 22nd July Projection) :

    Con 312 (+3) .. Lab 276 (-2) .. LibDem 30 (-2) .. SNP 9 (+1) .. PC 2 .. NI 18 .. UKIP 1 .. Respect 0 .. Green 1 .. Ind 0 .. Speaker 1

    Conservatives 14 seats short of a majority
    Labour 50 seats short of a majority
    ......................................................................................

    "JackW Dozen" - 13 seats that will shape the General Election result :

    Bury North - TCTC
    Pudsey - TCTC
    Broxtowe - Likely Lab Gain
    Warwickshire North - Likely Lab Gain
    Cambridge - Likely LibDem Hold
    Ipswich - TCTC
    Watford - TCTC
    Croydon Central - Likely Con Hold
    Enfield - TCTC
    Cornwall North - TCTC
    Great Yarmouth - Con Hold
    Vale of Glamorgan - Con Hold
    Ochil and South Perthshire - Likely Lab Hold

    Changes From 22nd July - Vale of Glamorgan moves from Likely Con Hold to Con Hold

    TCTC - Too Close To Call - Less than 500 votes
    Likely Hold/Gain - 500 - 2500 votes
    Gain/Hold - Over 2500 votes
    .......................................................................................

    WIND - Whimsical Independent News Division
    JNN - Jacobite News Network
    ARSE - Anonymous Random Selection of Electors
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    JackW said:

    BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS ****

    The breaking news is that WIND is reporting to the JNN the contents of the latest ARSE 2015 General Election and "JackW Dozen" Projections. (Change from 22nd July Projection) :

    Con 312 (+3) .. Lab 276 (-2) .. LibDem 30 (-2) .. SNP 9 (+1) .. PC 2 .. NI 18 .. UKIP 1 .. Respect 0 .. Green 1 .. Ind 0 .. Speaker 1

    Conservatives 14 seats short of a majority
    Labour 50 seats short of a majority
    ......................................................................................

    "JackW Dozen" - 13 seats that will shape the General Election result :

    Bury North - TCTC
    Pudsey - TCTC
    Broxtowe - Likely Lab Gain
    Warwickshire North - Likely Lab Gain
    Cambridge - Likely LibDem Hold
    Ipswich - TCTC
    Watford - TCTC
    Croydon Central - Likely Con Hold
    Enfield - TCTC
    Cornwall North - TCTC
    Great Yarmouth - Con Hold
    Vale of Glamorgan - Con Hold
    Ochil and South Perthshire - Likely Lab Hold

    Changes From 22nd July - Vale of Glamorgan moves from Likely Con Hold to Con Hold

    TCTC - Too Close To Call - Less than 500 votes
    Likely Hold/Gain - 500 - 2500 votes
    Gain/Hold - Over 2500 votes
    .......................................................................................

    WIND - Whimsical Independent News Division
    JNN - Jacobite News Network
    ARSE - Anonymous Random Selection of Electors

    Continuity coalition or supply and confidence?
  • FalseFlagFalseFlag Posts: 1,801
    Financier said:

    YouGov

    LD 2010 split:

    Cons:18
    LAB: 34
    LD: 24
    UKIP: 12
    Green: 8

    So Conservatives and UKIP have attracted almost as many 2010 LDs as Labour has, doesn't fit the narrative though does it?
  • FalseFlagFalseFlag Posts: 1,801
    http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2014/08/03/why-wont-obama-just-leave-ukraine-alone/

    Well at least one Western politician has learnt the lesson of WWI.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    JackW said:

    BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS ****

    The breaking news is that WIND is reporting to the JNN the contents of the latest ARSE 2015 General Election and "JackW Dozen" Projections. (Change from 22nd July Projection) :

    Con 312 (+3) .. Lab 276 (-2) .. LibDem 30 (-2) .. SNP 9 (+1) .. PC 2 .. NI 18 .. UKIP 1 .. Respect 0 .. Green 1 .. Ind 0 .. Speaker 1

    Conservatives 14 seats short of a majority
    Labour 50 seats short of a majority
    ......................................................................................

    "JackW Dozen" - 13 seats that will shape the General Election result :

    Bury North - TCTC
    Pudsey - TCTC
    Broxtowe - Likely Lab Gain
    Warwickshire North - Likely Lab Gain
    Cambridge - Likely LibDem Hold
    Ipswich - TCTC
    Watford - TCTC
    Croydon Central - Likely Con Hold
    Enfield - TCTC
    Cornwall North - TCTC
    Great Yarmouth - Con Hold
    Vale of Glamorgan - Con Hold
    Ochil and South Perthshire - Likely Lab Hold

    Changes From 22nd July - Vale of Glamorgan moves from Likely Con Hold to Con Hold

    TCTC - Too Close To Call - Less than 500 votes
    Likely Hold/Gain - 500 - 2500 votes
    Gain/Hold - Over 2500 votes
    .......................................................................................

    WIND - Whimsical Independent News Division
    JNN - Jacobite News Network
    ARSE - Anonymous Random Selection of Electors

    Ochil as a Labour hold, and SNP up to 9... bad night for the Lib Dems in Scotland ?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS **** BREAKING WIND NEWS ****

    The breaking news is that WIND is reporting to the JNN the contents of the latest ARSE 2015 General Election and "JackW Dozen" Projections. (Change from 22nd July Projection) :

    Con 312 (+3) .. Lab 276 (-2) .. LibDem 30 (-2) .. SNP 9 (+1) .. PC 2 .. NI 18 .. UKIP 1 .. Respect 0 .. Green 1 .. Ind 0 .. Speaker 1

    Conservatives 14 seats short of a majority
    Labour 50 seats short of a majority
    ......................................................................................

    "JackW Dozen" - 13 seats that will shape the General Election result :

    Bury North - TCTC
    Pudsey - TCTC
    Broxtowe - Likely Lab Gain
    Warwickshire North - Likely Lab Gain
    Cambridge - Likely LibDem Hold
    Ipswich - TCTC
    Watford - TCTC
    Croydon Central - Likely Con Hold
    Enfield - TCTC
    Cornwall North - TCTC
    Great Yarmouth - Con Hold
    Vale of Glamorgan - Con Hold
    Ochil and South Perthshire - Likely Lab Hold

    Changes From 22nd July - Vale of Glamorgan moves from Likely Con Hold to Con Hold

    TCTC - Too Close To Call - Less than 500 votes
    Likely Hold/Gain - 500 - 2500 votes
    Gain/Hold - Over 2500 votes
    .......................................................................................

    WIND - Whimsical Independent News Division
    JNN - Jacobite News Network
    ARSE - Anonymous Random Selection of Electors

    Continuity coalition or supply and confidence?
    I've never understood the long term political rationale behind "supply and confidence" - All the blame and none of the power.

    Accordingly - "Coalition - the Sequel"

  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,142


    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    edited August 2014
    FalseFlag said:

    Financier said:

    YouGov

    LD 2010 split:

    Cons:18
    LAB: 34
    LD: 24
    UKIP: 12
    Green: 8

    So Conservatives and UKIP have attracted almost as many 2010 LDs as Labour has, doesn't fit the narrative though does it?
    UKIP + Green + Lib Dem ~= Conservative in VI % terms - but they won't get as many seats.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    People waiting over 18 weeks 2,508,495 in April 2010, the month before the coalition took office. Now over 3 million (20% increase)

    Mr Dancer No direct comparison as Wales do not collect 18 week figures. On the two figures they do collect one has deteriorated quite badly over the same period (number of waiters over 26 weeks up by 30,000) the other has now started coming down.

    As an English voter the tiresome Welsh comparison every time the latest English NHS stat showS the service getting worse is not persuasive. I will bet the position in England gets worse and the 3 million number is even higher by GE 2015.

    The 90% target IMHO will still be being breached at GE 2015.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Mr. Owls, cheers for that answer.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406

    The Scottish Tories are huge winners from the Better Together campaign. Scottish Labour are getting thumped by their decision to not just hop into bed with the Tories but to shag them like bunnies. It is clear which partner is on top.

    Populus
    Westminster voting intention - Scotland
    Sub-sample size = 181
    (+/- change from UK GE 2010)

    Lab 32% (-10)
    SNP 28% (+8)
    Con 26% (+9)
    LD 8% (-11)
    UKIP 4% (+3)
    Grn 2% (+1)

    WHat is the picture for the last 10 Populus - will give an 1800 sample size, 181 isn't enough.
  • The bottom has just fallen out of the Betfair market. At the 500 GBP stake level the current prices are:

    Yes 3
    No 1.22

    The big money is ca'ing canny.

  • As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.

    As I said ...

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    F1: the Independent reckons Ecclestone will pay an out-of-court settlement of £60m:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/28637979

    If so, he'll remain as F1 boss for a while, but he still has a rapidly approaching expiry rate due to age if nothing else.
  • Pulpstar said:

    The Scottish Tories are huge winners from the Better Together campaign. Scottish Labour are getting thumped by their decision to not just hop into bed with the Tories but to shag them like bunnies. It is clear which partner is on top.

    Populus
    Westminster voting intention - Scotland
    Sub-sample size = 181
    (+/- change from UK GE 2010)

    Lab 32% (-10)
    SNP 28% (+8)
    Con 26% (+9)
    LD 8% (-11)
    UKIP 4% (+3)
    Grn 2% (+1)

    WHat is the picture for the last 10 Populus - will give an 1800 sample size, 181 isn't enough.
    Just about to drive to airport so signing out.

    See Populus aggregates on their own website.

    Otherwise, Martin Baxter lists all the Populus and YG aggregates on his Electoral Calculus Scotland pages, however, he tends to take a few weeks to update that table, so probably better to go direct to source.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    GO big opportunity today to bind together northern cities & show a bit more of that one nation Toryism by agreeing the (paltry) £15bn for a more integrated transport system.

    Will be powerfully him getting on with his job narrative.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    I now think Torbay is Too Close to Call given the recent Lib Dem fallback.

  • As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
    They will never ever learn.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,142
    Re. tonight's debate, the postcode registration for STV's online player will be lifted so anyone anywhere can watch it.
  • Baroness Warsi resigns saying she can't support government policy on Gaza
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Warsi resigns over Government policy on Gaza.

    Presumably "blatant opportunism of the worst kind"
  • dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Warsi resigns over Gaza
  • Somebody I respect once said Sayeeda Warsi was the worst Tory chairman in history, that was someone who dealt with Jeremy Hanley on a regular abyss during his stint as Tory chairman.

  • As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
    They will never ever learn.

    I have learned that to get a Scottish nationalist to engage in an argument about substantive issues is a task that is almost impossible to achieve. It's a shame really. I'd love to know why you believe the professor is wrong.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Bloody militant atheists. Oh, right...

    What's Warsi's specific problem with government policy? It also seems peculiar to resign over Gaza as Israel appears (only seen the headline on the BBC news website) to be withdrawing.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    edited August 2014
    Pulpstar's General Election prediction:

    CON 274 (-1)
    LAB 314 (+1)
    LIB 27 (-1)
    NAT 15 (+1)
    UKIP 3

    Dumfries & Galloway: Con Gain
    Hallam: LD Hold
    Inverness, Bairn & Strathspey - SNP Gain
    Pudsey: TCTC (Was Con Hold)
    Reading West: Lab Gain
    Sherwood: Lab Gain (Was Con Hold)
    Southampton Itchen: TCTC (Was Con Gain)
    Thurrock: UKIP Gain
    Torbay - TCTC (Was LD Hold)

    New Seat:

    Dunbartonshire East: Narrow Lab gain (SNP 2nd)
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Baroness Warsi resigns saying she can't support government policy on Gaza

    Much needed boost for DC ?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Just a bit more on the Ecclestone business. I really like this line from the BBC:
    "German prosecutors say they would accept an offer of $100m (£60m) from Formula 1 chief Bernie Ecclestone to end his trial on bribery charges."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28656050
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,142


    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
    They will never ever learn.
    Let me take a wild guess, quoting the prof's own intemperate remarks and referring to British nationalism will be regarded as ill-considered abuse.
  • TGOHF said:

    Baroness Warsi resigns saying she can't support government policy on Gaza

    Much needed boost for DC ?
    Nah.

    My Mum's going to be disappointed in Dave.

    My attempts to persuade my Mum to vote Tory next year have been dealt a fatal blow.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    So the debate - lay No now at 1.23 , then back when Eck gets a few cheers from placemen in the crowd and the price drifts up to say 1.3 ?

  • Is there going to be any post debate polling ?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    TGOHF said:

    So the debate - lay No now at 1.23 , then back when Eck gets a few cheers from placemen in the crowd and the price drifts up to say 1.3 ?

    Canny Mr Dickson recommended a lay of No at 1.18 and stuck about £200 liability on it.

  • As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
    They will never ever learn.
    Let me take a wild guess, quoting the prof's own intemperate remarks and referring to British nationalism will be regarded as ill-considered abuse.

    Not at all. British nationalism certainly exists. I was just interested in understanding why you believe the professor is wrong to assert that unionism does not necessarily equate to British nationalism. Why do you reject his explanation of why he does not consider himself a British nationalist?

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Is Ladbrokes running debate bingo?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar's General Election prediction:

    CON 274 (-1)
    LAB 314 (+1)
    LIB 27 (-1)
    NAT 15 (+1)
    UKIP 3

    Dumfries & Galloway: Con Gain
    Hallam: LD Hold
    Inverness, Bairn & Strathspey - SNP Gain
    Pudsey: TCTC (Was Con Hold)
    Reading West: Lab Gain
    Sherwood: Lab Gain (Was Con Hold)
    Southampton Itchen: TCTC (Was Con Gain)
    Thurrock: UKIP Gain
    Torbay - TCTC (Was LD Hold)

    Wouldn't be surprised if you are very close. I still think LD will hold Torbay and do ok comparatively in LD/CON marginals.

    Would this result win your bet on Tories most votes? (looks very close)
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Pulpstar said:

    TGOHF said:

    So the debate - lay No now at 1.23 , then back when Eck gets a few cheers from placemen in the crowd and the price drifts up to say 1.3 ?

    Canny Mr Dickson recommended a lay of No at 1.18 and stuck about £200 liability on it.
    Any predictions on how high No might drift during the debate - higher than 1.3 ?

  • For those with sky but not living in Scotland, you can add STV to your sky box and watch the debate live

    1) Press services on your sky box

    2) Scroll down to 'Add channels' (Another menu will appear displaying Frequency, Polarization, Symbol Rate and FEC)

    3) Change the frequency to 10906

    4) Change the Polarization to "V"

    5) Change the Symbol Rate to 22.0

    6)Change the FEC number to 5/6

    7)Select ''Find channels'' at the bottom of the menu

    8)You will now see a list of available channels including STV. Simply highlight STV and press the yellow button. A tick will now appear next to STV. Press "Select" again to store STV.

    9)Press "Back Up" several times to come out of all the menus until you get your Sky picture again. ( DON'T PRESS TV)

    10)Whenever you wish to watch STV in the future simply press "Services" on your remote control which will bring up the menu. Select "Other Channels" and you will then be able to highlight STV and press "Select" to watch.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    I note a proliferation of disciples of my ARSE this morning.

    Most commendable, although I note much of the content is straying from the dictates of the site deity.

    Children can be so burdensome ....
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406

    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar's General Election prediction:

    CON 274 (-1)
    LAB 314 (+1)
    LIB 27 (-1)
    NAT 15 (+1)
    UKIP 3

    Dumfries & Galloway: Con Gain
    Hallam: LD Hold
    Inverness, Bairn & Strathspey - SNP Gain
    Pudsey: TCTC (Was Con Hold)
    Reading West: Lab Gain
    Sherwood: Lab Gain (Was Con Hold)
    Southampton Itchen: TCTC (Was Con Gain)
    Thurrock: UKIP Gain
    Torbay - TCTC (Was LD Hold)

    Wouldn't be surprised if you are very close. I still think LD will hold Torbay and do ok comparatively in LD/CON marginals.

    Would this result win your bet on Tories most votes? (looks very close)
    I think so Lab Most votes = Lab Majority methinks.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Just a bit more on the Ecclestone business. I really like this line from the BBC:
    "German prosecutors say they would accept an offer of $100m (£60m) from Formula 1 chief Bernie Ecclestone to end his trial on bribery charges."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28656050

    Who said the Germans don't do irony?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Rchard Murray, the director of policy at the King's Fund, said the fact that the waiting list had topped three million was "a sign of where the NHS is heading".

    He added: "The worrying thing about the growth in the waiting list is that it shows that demand is rising and will mean in the near future that it could be much harder for the NHS to keep hitting the 90% target. There could be significant breaches of the target, with it falling well below 90%."

    It was worrying that referral-to-treatment performance was under such pressure at the same time as the targets to treat patients in A&E units and with cancer were being missed in a growing number of hospitals, he said.

    "If the NHS is to keep meeting the 90% target it's going to have to do extra operations and it's not clear where that money would come from. With the number of both performance problems and financial problems rising in the NHS, it's starting to be a bit of a race as to whether the government can get to the general election either by giving the NHS more money or watching NHS performance deteriorate."

    I predict the NHS will be an important election issue that will be damaging to the Tories.
  • Also don't forget, Scotland's most accurate pollster at the last Holyrood elections will be releasing a new poll at the start of the debate.

    That too could shift prices.

    IIRC their last poll in June saw No's lead cut by 7
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216


    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
    They will never ever learn.
    Let me take a wild guess, quoting the prof's own intemperate remarks and referring to British nationalism will be regarded as ill-considered abuse.

    Not at all. British nationalism certainly exists. I was just interested in understanding why you believe the professor is wrong to assert that unionism does not necessarily equate to British nationalism. Why do you reject his explanation of why he does not consider himself a British nationalist?

    My guess is its all part of the Scot Nat narrative that Scotland is effectively an oppressed colony of the English and therefore it is impossible to be both a Scottish Nationalist and a Unionist as Unionism is equivalent to British (hegemonic) nationalism. Or something. But as you observe, its tough to get a dialogue going with most of the Nationalist persuasion - it swiftly collapses into slogans 'its our pound too!'.......

  • I am very bullish on a Yes vote on 18th September. It'll be close, but divorce looks pretty certain to me. Hopefully, it won't be too messy.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    @bigjohnowls

    You'll be even more scornful of the Labour party as they decried the extra funding the Coaltion has allocated the NHS.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    @Southamobserver - Not a peep from any paper regarding the wreaths.

    Pulpstar said:

    The telling point will be how many commentators/papers run with Ed's note as opposed to or with Clegg's as a minor footnote to the article.

    It will be horrific for Miliband in the Mail, the Sun and the Express tomorrow.

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406

    I am very bullish on a Yes vote on 18th September. It'll be close, but divorce looks pretty certain to me. Hopefully, it won't be too messy.

    One to be filed with the Romney predictions in due time. I feel your prediction record won't be adversely affected.
  • I am very bullish on a Yes vote on 18th September. It'll be close, but divorce looks pretty certain to me. Hopefully, it won't be too messy.

    Divorces are always messy. Especially when assets and liabilities are involved.

    All the assets are mine, the liabilities are yours kinda thing.

    In 1707 we should have signed a pre-nup*

    *I know.
  • Pulpstar said:

    @Southamobserver - Not a peep from any paper regarding the wreaths.

    Pulpstar said:

    The telling point will be how many commentators/papers run with Ed's note as opposed to or with Clegg's as a minor footnote to the article.

    It will be horrific for Miliband in the Mail, the Sun and the Express tomorrow.

    The narrative changed very quickly after it emerged all the senior political leaders except Cameron had similar messages.

  • HughHugh Posts: 955


    As I said yesterday, it would be good to read a considered, non-abusive response from someone on the Yes side.

    If only there was a considered, non-abusive piece to respond to.

    'socialist utopia', 'profoundly misguided', 'an impoverished and depleted view of the world', 'deficiencies', 'blinkered', 'ferocity'.

    I wonder which side of the debate this master of Olympian detachment is referring to? Still, some amusement is to be gained from Unionists who've just about managed to accept the description of Unionist now trying to push their British nationalism to the back of the closet.
    They will never ever learn.

    I have learned that to get a Scottish nationalist to engage in an argument about substantive issues is a task that is almost impossible to achieve. It's a shame really. I'd love to know why you believe the professor is wrong.
    What do you consider a "substantive issue", and is it the same as a Yes campaigner / Scottish Nationalist?

    And how many Scottish Nationalists do you regularly try to engage with, and where? Just on here?

    To the extent that your description is accurate, it applies to Unionists as much as Nationalists in my opinion.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Meanwhile...

    #UK Services sector continues to expand sharply in July and PMI hits 8-month high at 59.1 from 57.7
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    edited August 2014
    @bigjohnowls I think vote share % could be TCTC between Lab and Con - UKIP will thrash the Lib Dems in terms of votes I think.

    Lab/Con vote % could depend on the weather on the day - Sunny = Labour, Rainy = Con.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    I am very bullish on a Yes vote on 18th September. It'll be close, but divorce looks pretty certain to me. Hopefully, it won't be too messy.

    How's President Romney doing these days ??

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Perhaps they could watch the debate tonight (lol)

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/epic/sldot/11012409/Standard-Life-warns-no-clarity-on-Scottish-independence.html

    "With the vote on Scottish Independence less than two months away, the company said it did "not believe that further clarity has been provided" on issues raised in February that could materially affect its four million UK customers, shareholders, and staff.

    These material issues include what currency will an independent Scotland use, whether it will join the EU, the shape of the monetary system, financial regulation, taxation and the impact of the change on savings and pensions.

    The pensions, savings and insurance giant said in February that it was preparing to shift operations and personnel from its Edinburgh headquarters a “precautionary measure to ensure continuity of our businesses’ competitive position”."
This discussion has been closed.