Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As long as Paddy Ashdown’s on side then Nick Clegg’s positi

SystemSystem Posts: 11,697
edited May 2014 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As long as Paddy Ashdown’s on side then Nick Clegg’s position is secure

Back in September 2012 at the Lib Dem Brighton conference Clegg announced the appointment of ex-leader, Paddy Ashdown as head of the party’s 2015 general election campaign.

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137
    edited May 2014
    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,554
    RodCrosby said:

    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?


    mike@politicalbetting.com
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,971
    RodCrosby said:

    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?

    Be sure not to mention that UKIP did well last night
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,554
    Re Clegg's departure before the General Election.

    You get the feeling that it's a matter of when not if.

    And I was someone upto a few weeks ago was quite confident in Clegg lasting until after the GE.
  • Options
    MrJonesMrJones Posts: 3,523
    You'd think it would be more humane to put him out of his misery.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,554
    Re that picture.

    I'm half expecting David Tennant to turn up and say "Don't you think he looks tired"
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Ashdown would make a good reassuring caretaker leader, not tainted by government.

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    Mr. Eagles, he should stay, and I still think he will.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,354

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2014
    I keep hearing what good would come if Clegg departed.

    I ask the question: What good would come if Clegg stayed ? What is this great difference that will happen in the next year ?

    Even Labour is eating into the Lib Dem vote in SW England. SW London was not so good either.

    In Kingston, with a sitting MP, the Lib Dems lost 13% in votes, roughly 1 in 3. UKIP beat Lib Dems in Sutton in the Euro.

    Labour looking good in Bermondsey, Brent, Haringey.

  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    "I don't agree with Nick" :)
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137
    Adam Boulton: thinks Clegg will lead the LibDems into the next election. He was uncertain whether there will be a meaningful LibDem party to lead after that though....
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,354
    I owe DavidL £10 for Better Together from our bet on turnout. How/where do you want it sent, David? (Maybe best to reply by email with nickmp1 at aol.com as I'm off to Holland for 4 days)
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Let's talk about Newark !
  • Options
    Clegg looks like a little boy about to blub in his Sky interview. Not a good look for a supposedly serious politician.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,356
    Politicians have thicker hides than most but an early resignation with a new leader being selected at the Conference in September and Nick staying on in a caretaker role till then looks a real possibility to me. There are defeats and there are humiliations. This is definitely in the latter category with the local election results far more damaging than the Euros.

    By September any pretence that the Coalition can agree on anything else and implement it before the election will have ended and we will be in full election mode for the next 7 months (sigh). It would be the right time.
  • Options
    MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
  • Options
    DadgeDadge Posts: 2,038
    edited May 2014
    GE map based on Euros twitter.com/BaileyNagy/status/470931030653018112/photo/1
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I love the inclusion of all the votes of an entirely separate party in the UKIP tally. As if the whole exercise of pretending that the Euro election were a general election had any validity at all in the first place.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2014
    Dadge said:

    GE map based on Euros twitter.com/BaileyNagy/status/470931030653018112/photo/1

    Is that what is meant by a Con - UKIP coalition ?

    Ha ha ha !
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    Mr. Dadge, interesting from a theoretical perspective, but I would be quite surprised if UKIP got most votes and/or 110 seats in the General Election.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Tigers are a highly endangered species, so not a good analogy. Maybe LibDems are the Tigers!

    UKIP are more like the rat. Fast breeding, get everywhere and capable of biting when cornered.
    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
  • Options
    JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    My Gf's mum is a cable fan - I'm a nick fan.

    We had an idea of me seducing [censored], leader of [censored]

    Kay Burley gets too excited!!!!!!!
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    isam said:

    RodCrosby said:

    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?

    Be sure not to mention that UKIP did well last night
    UKIP did very well.... under PR in an election that doesn't matter, on a half-arsed turnout...

    My article is about the next real election in 2015. It doesn't mention UKIP, or the LibDems.
  • Options
    DadgeDadge Posts: 2,038

    Mr. Dadge, interesting from a theoretical perspective, but I would be quite surprised if UKIP got most votes and/or 110 seats in the General Election.

    So would I, but Ukip have ammunition like this now to show that voting Ukip isn't necessarily a wasted vote, even under FPTP. My guess at the moment would be that Ukip will get seats in the double figures at the GE.

  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,356

    I owe DavidL £10 for Better Together from our bet on turnout. How/where do you want it sent, David? (Maybe best to reply by email with nickmp1 at aol.com as I'm off to Holland for 4 days)

    Just send it direct to Better Together Nick. I am more than happy to take your word on it.

    There were points last night when I honestly thought I had lost. The EU authorities were claiming 36% turnout. Goodness knows where they got their figures from.

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    Mr. Dadge, hmm. I wouldn't be shocked but I think single figures likelier.

    And where, is a critical point. Even more important is where their votes nationwide come from. Will they bugger things up more for Labour, or the Conservatives?
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Farage "Go back to your constituencies and prepare for government"

    Or was that someone elses tagline?
    Dadge said:

    Mr. Dadge, interesting from a theoretical perspective, but I would be quite surprised if UKIP got most votes and/or 110 seats in the General Election.

    So would I, but Ukip have ammunition like this now to show that voting Ukip isn't necessarily a wasted vote, even under FPTP. My guess at the moment would be that Ukip will get seats in the double figures at the GE.

  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,902
    Ashdown's position is bizarre.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377

    Farage "Go back to your constituencies and prepare for government"

    Or was that someone elses tagline?

    One of Clegg's predecessors? :)
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    antifrank said:

    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
    I'll concede, provided we can name it Blondi.

    Otherwise too Churchillian.

  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    antifrank said:

    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
    Senile enough to win the Euro election?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137
    Patrick said:

    Clegg looks like a little boy about to blub in his Sky interview. Not a good look for a supposedly serious politician.

    Damned if he hid, damned if he gave an interview that screamed "broken LibDems on the slide..."

    I can't imagine any FTSE company allowing its CEO to go on the media looking like that though. The share price would crash.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,882
    Nick and Danny very tired and emotional about it all, LOL!

    All those decades the Lib-Dems were hoping and praying for a hung parliament to get them into government and what happens when they finally get their wish? They hate every second of it, LOL!
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    RodCrosby said:

    isam said:

    RodCrosby said:

    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?

    Be sure not to mention that UKIP did well last night
    UKIP did very well.... under PR in an election that doesn't matter, on a half-arsed turnout...

    My article is about the next real election in 2015. It doesn't mention UKIP, or the LibDems.
    In that case, do GEs really "matter", given that so much of our governance originates in Brussels?
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    To be fair, Mr. Gin, they could've handled many things better.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,356
    My last outstanding bet with fellow PBers is with Isam about the Lib Dems beating UKIP at the next election. Must admit to getting a bit twitchy about that one!
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,882
    Any word from Lord Oakshott, (and Vince)?
  • Options
    MrJonesMrJones Posts: 3,523
    heavy fighting at Donetsk airport apparently - can't imagine who'd want an airport in Donetsk
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,420
    On topic, I agree with Mike. The only slight point I'd quibble on is the inference that Ashdown has the opportunity to have doubts in the future (which I'm reading as 'before the election'). He hasn't. He's nailed his colours to the mast now and can't perform a U-turn. There simply won't be the opportunity - what could justify going later and not now? If he's prepared to stand by Clegg after the mauling the Lib Dems have taken this week, he'll stand through anything.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    antifrank said:

    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
    Senile enough to win the Euro election?
    Joke election, joke party. I'm feeling quite well disposed towards the daft old pooch today, having transferred a large sum of money into my bank account from Ladbrokes earlier this afternoon, part of which was attributable to UKIP.

    I'm currently weighing whether the odds on UKIP getting no MPs are going to improve over the next few days or whether now is as good as it gets. On balance I think those odds are likely to get better, so I'll hold off for now.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Jonathan said:

    Ashdown's position is bizarre.

    Normally, he is always on a mission !
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137



    Senile enough to win the Euro election?

    You could have put a purple rosette on a donkey on Thursday and got it elected.... ;-)

    The irony of UKIP - UKIP!!! - taming the whirlwind of anti-politics that burst forth over expenses is very funny.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,971
    Cleggs aged in one day like Farage has in 17 years!!!

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/25/farage-17-years-later

  • Options
    Blue_rogBlue_rog Posts: 2,019

    Mr. Dadge, hmm. I wouldn't be shocked but I think single figures likelier.

    And where, is a critical point. Even more important is where their votes nationwide come from. Will they bugger things up more for Labour, or the Conservatives?

    I'd like to think UKIP could get double figures as it would strengthen any coalition agreement with the Tories if they are the largest party after GE2015. I can't see any way that the LD's would go with the Tories again, and visa versa.

    We could be looking at a minority government followed by a quick election - tied to the Europe question perhaps?
  • Options
    MrJonesMrJones Posts: 3,523
    Jonathan said:

    Ashdown's position is bizarre.

    do or die mentality

    great in the military, not so great in politics
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137
    MrJones said:

    heavy fighting at Donetsk airport apparently - can't imagine who'd want an airport in Donetsk

    Ryanair. Their new base for "greater London" flights....

  • Options
    MrJonesMrJones Posts: 3,523

    MrJones said:

    heavy fighting at Donetsk airport apparently - can't imagine who'd want an airport in Donetsk

    Ryanair. Their new base for "greater London" flights....

    lolz
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,882
    I wonder whether Dave and George have told Nick to pull himself together? Can't imagine there's much sympathy for Clegg inside Downing St after his game playing over the boundaries

    The Tories could easily spend the last year as a minority government, so I imagine they'll be pretty sanguine about Clegg's apparent emotional break-down.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    Dr Fox,

    I agree, rats are a better simile for Ukip. You're never more than five yards away from one and there's a lot more of them than you suspect. And you'll never get rid of them,.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,971
    antifrank said:

    antifrank said:

    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
    Senile enough to win the Euro election?
    Joke election, joke party. I'm feeling quite well disposed towards the daft old pooch today, having transferred a large sum of money into my bank account from Ladbrokes earlier this afternoon, part of which was attributable to UKIP.

    I'm currently weighing whether the odds on UKIP getting no MPs are going to improve over the next few days or whether now is as good as it gets. On balance I think those odds are likely to get better, so I'll hold off for now.
    Youre welcome to top up your 4/6 on UKIP getting less than 10% at the GE if you like?

    Or The Lib Dems out polling them at the same price

  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,676
    Mr Clegg remains an electoral asset for Labour. Hopefully he will stay until the day after the GE.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,942
    Talk of Better Together reminds me of how graceless and grumpy Alex Salmond was on the telly last night. I know Scotland is a different country, but that can't have been appealing to many people anywhere, can it?

    Talk of the LibDems reminds me that I was impressed by Tim Faron. He took it on the chin and was never grouchy. I think there is still hope for them. Come the GE, there will still be an anti-Tory constituency to milk. But soon afterwards the LDs will have a new leader.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,882

    To be fair, Mr. Gin, they could've handled many things better.

    You can say that again.

    The big mistake was making AV!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! And HOL reform more important to their coalition negotiations than implementing their tution fee's pledge. It looked so self-serving and has poisoned everything they've done since.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    isam said:

    antifrank said:

    antifrank said:

    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
    Senile enough to win the Euro election?
    Joke election, joke party. I'm feeling quite well disposed towards the daft old pooch today, having transferred a large sum of money into my bank account from Ladbrokes earlier this afternoon, part of which was attributable to UKIP.

    I'm currently weighing whether the odds on UKIP getting no MPs are going to improve over the next few days or whether now is as good as it gets. On balance I think those odds are likely to get better, so I'll hold off for now.
    Youre welcome to top up your 4/6 on UKIP getting less than 10% at the GE if you like?

    Or The Lib Dems out polling them at the same price

    I'll do some calculations and come back to you on this in the next few days, if I may.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    Shouldn't the French Open Tennis be sponsored by Front Nationale, and not by the BNP?

    :)
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,676
    BBC NI vote share 'guess':

    SINN FEIN 28%
    DUP 23%
    UUP 16%
    SDLP 12%
    TUV 10%
    ALLIANCE 7%
    UKIP 3%
  • Options
    volcanopetevolcanopete Posts: 2,078
    31-40 currently Ladbrokes 7/4 fav. in the L/D banded seats market but 21-30 has been backed into 7-2.
    I suggest those are the wrong way round if Clegg remains in post.
  • Options
    JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380

    Shouldn't the French Open Tennis be sponsored by Front Nationale, and not by the BNP?

    :)

    Indeed Sunil - Damn you Petronas!!! I'm team Massa Martini from now on.

  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Blue_rog said:

    Mr. Dadge, hmm. I wouldn't be shocked but I think single figures likelier.

    And where, is a critical point. Even more important is where their votes nationwide come from. Will they bugger things up more for Labour, or the Conservatives?

    I'd like to think UKIP could get double figures as it would strengthen any coalition agreement with the Tories if they are the largest party after GE2015. I can't see any way that the LD's would go with the Tories again, and visa versa.

    We could be looking at a minority government followed by a quick election - tied to the Europe question perhaps?
    If UKIP get 10 seats. I don't think any would be at the expense of Labour except, perhaps, Great Grimsby.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377

    BBC NI vote share 'guess':

    SINN FEIN 28%
    DUP 23%
    UUP 16%
    SDLP 12%
    TUV 10%
    ALLIANCE 7%
    UKIP 3%

    Interesting, back to 40% for the Nationalists? (38% in the locals)
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    edited May 2014
    Louise Mensch ‏@LouiseMensch ·3 mins
    What Clegg should be doing is talking about the GE and reviewing the LD's Eurofanaticism. "Party of In" = Party of Bin,"
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,997
    Clegg was a slippery as ever in that interview. He says "We're not going to buckle, we're not going to lose our nerve, we're not going to walk away.". He is actually talking about himself but he presents it as if he is talking about his party.

    The critics in his party are not suggesting that the party buckles, loses its nerve or walks away. They are suggesting that a serious review of Clegg's position is needed as many people just turn off when he speaks (a bit like Blair but not quite as bad!)

    It will be a disaster if Clegg leads for the LibDems in any GE debate. Their best bet, if Clegg stays on, is to sabotage the discussions on the debates so that there are none.

    I'm sitting here, credit card in hand, ready to phone the LibDem HQ, and rejoin the party the moment that I hear Clegg is standing down.

    Incidentally Ashdown and Campbell are the party elite. The elite don't carry as much weight these days.
  • Options
    Under the leadership of Ed Miliband, Labour are on course to win a historic majority in 2015.

    The Tory toffs will deeply regret privatising the NHS. No doubt they thought the Bedroom Tax was a jolly wheeze on the Playing Fields of Eton. I am sure that Gideon Osborne's VAT increase will have sparked many a 'well done, old chap' over cigars and port at the Bullingdon Club.

    Hardworking people up and down the country are worried about the Cost of Living Crisis. That's why Labour will cut the price of gas. That's why Labour will cut the price of rent. We will pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax. What did the Tories do? A tax cut for millionaires!

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP deny Climate Change, and therefore deny the solutions that are necessary in solving it, such as a bankers' bonus tax. This is the racism of the 21st century, and should be stigmatised just as much. The working class will recognise Ed Miliband's leadership at Kyoto and elsewhere on this burning issue, and will reward him handsomely for it.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP worship the false idol of 'merit' instead of relying on quotas and shortlists to impose equality on society in terms of gender and ethnicity. How can we have equality without quotas? This too should be forbidden by law. We will fund the campaign for this equalities act with a bankers' bonus tax. Our great deputy leader Harrier Harman has already gone part of the way into enshrining this this fundamental principle into law with her marvellous Equalities Act, and Labour will be rewarded for time immemorial. They will reward us just as they reward us for being the party of the Welfare State.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories and the BNP want Britain to leave or renegotiate our membership of the EU. This cannot be allowed. We should reject the Anglophile, atlanticist alliances which have betrayed Britain, and instead, help the poor of Greece and Portugal out of their plight by picking up the tab for their welfare state; we can pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax.

    Ed Miliband will adorn the annals of Labour party history, alongside other great leaders in the Labour pantheon. Ed Miliband will stand alongside Keir Hardie, Clement Attlee, and Gordon Brown.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    antifrank said:


    Joke election, joke party.

    In that case, do GEs really "matter", given that so much of our governance originates in Brussels?
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    Mr. Gin, indeed, I was also thinking of the way the pro-coalition Lib Dems spent a lot of time publicly disagreeing with their coalition partners. Didn't look clever at the time and it's hard to claim credit when you spend months and years criticising the major partner of government.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Mr Clegg remains an electoral asset for Labour. Hopefully he will stay until the day after the GE.

    I don't want Cable to take over !
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,356

    Talk of Better Together reminds me of how graceless and grumpy Alex Salmond was on the telly last night. I know Scotland is a different country, but that can't have been appealing to many people anywhere, can it?

    Agreed. Not one of his better efforts. One of the strangest results on a strange night is UKIP coming from nowhere to win a seat in Scotland AND the tory vote rising at the same time (albeit by MoE levels).

    Where did the UKIP supporters come from? It would be fascinating to know. The obvious answer is ex Lib Dems and given what happened elsewhere I don't think that can be ruled out. I also wonder if some SNP supporters are not completely engaged with Salmond's love affair with the EU.

    Anyway with 63% of the votes for Unionist parties it was a good night for no.

  • Options
    JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    Yes! - A real LMensch

    Bye bye lib dem tories

    Not looking good for next year though - My plan might just work!!!!
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    Mr. Labour, huzzah for Comrade Miliband!
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,151

    RodCrosby said:

    isam said:

    RodCrosby said:

    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?

    Be sure not to mention that UKIP did well last night
    UKIP did very well.... under PR in an election that doesn't matter, on a half-arsed turnout...

    My article is about the next real election in 2015. It doesn't mention UKIP, or the LibDems.
    In that case, do GEs really "matter", given that so much of our governance originates in Brussels?
    UK general elections decide which ministers the UK sends to Brussels to decide what laws will and won't originate there, so yes, they do matter.
  • Options
    MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    antifrank said:

    AveryLP said:

    MikeK said:

    Reposted from previous thread:

    Jonathan said:
    "Interesting interview with Nick Clegg. The words are defiant, but the body language is anything but. Appears wounded."

    I heard him basically saying "I'll soldier on if you want me to, guys....." Ball in the court of the men in (yellow?) suits.

    I still don't see the Libdems being listened to by the electorate whilst Clegg is there. It may just be Clegg's misfortune to be in charge when the box was opened on the Schrödinger's cat that had been the LibDems. But that is a fundamental structural failure in a party trying to be all things to all men and positioning itself for a role in a Coalition Govt.. Be careful what you wish for.

    Ironically, there is a risk that UKIP may now have taken on this Schrödinger's cat mantle, when it has to take positions and is consequently being seen to be compromised: when they start having to be FOR something and no longer AGAINST everything.

    Nice analogy! But the LibDems kept up their chameleon ability to seem similar to anyone they talked to until they actually took office. Bar the odd counci (maybe) UKIP isn't going to be responsible for anything for the next 11 months, so they can continue to be the purring cat inside the box.
    How dare you compare UKIP to a pussycat, au contraire, UKIP are a Tiger, just don't get on our back. ;)
    Me old Weathercock

    UKIP is canine not feline.

    It is a pit bull terrier trying to pass itself off as a poodle.

    For once, Mr LP, you are mistaken.

    UKIP is a senile and flatulent bulldog.
    Oh dear! Two old rat-bags fighting over the carcass of their fondest beliefs.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,356

    Under the leadership of Ed Miliband, Labour are on course to win a historic majority in 2015.

    The Tory toffs will deeply regret privatising the NHS. No doubt they thought the Bedroom Tax was a jolly wheeze on the Playing Fields of Eton. I am sure that Gideon Osborne's VAT increase will have sparked many a 'well done, old chap' over cigars and port at the Bullingdon Club.

    Hardworking people up and down the country are worried about the Cost of Living Crisis. That's why Labour will cut the price of gas. That's why Labour will cut the price of rent. We will pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax. What did the Tories do? A tax cut for millionaires!

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP deny Climate Change, and therefore deny the solutions that are necessary in solving it, such as a bankers' bonus tax. This is the racism of the 21st century, and should be stigmatised just as much. The working class will recognise Ed Miliband's leadership at Kyoto and elsewhere on this burning issue, and will reward him handsomely for it.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP worship the false idol of 'merit' instead of relying on quotas and shortlists to impose equality on society in terms of gender and ethnicity. How can we have equality without quotas? This too should be forbidden by law. We will fund the campaign for this equalities act with a bankers' bonus tax. Our great deputy leader Harrier Harman has already gone part of the way into enshrining this this fundamental principle into law with her marvellous Equalities Act, and Labour will be rewarded for time immemorial. They will reward us just as they reward us for being the party of the Welfare State.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories and the BNP want Britain to leave or renegotiate our membership of the EU. This cannot be allowed. We should reject the Anglophile, atlanticist alliances which have betrayed Britain, and instead, help the poor of Greece and Portugal out of their plight by picking up the tab for their welfare state; we can pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax.

    Ed Miliband will adorn the annals of Labour party history, alongside other great leaders in the Labour pantheon. Ed Miliband will stand alongside Keir Hardie, Clement Attlee, and Gordon Brown.

    LOL. Good effort.

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,486

    Under the leadership of Ed Miliband, Labour are on course to win a historic majority in 2015.

    The Tory toffs will deeply regret privatising the NHS. No doubt they thought the Bedroom Tax was a jolly wheeze on the Playing Fields of Eton. I am sure that Gideon Osborne's VAT increase will have sparked many a 'well done, old chap' over cigars and port at the Bullingdon Club.

    Hardworking people up and down the country are worried about the Cost of Living Crisis. That's why Labour will cut the price of gas. That's why Labour will cut the price of rent. We will pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax. What did the Tories do? A tax cut for millionaires!

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP deny Climate Change, and therefore deny the solutions that are necessary in solving it, such as a bankers' bonus tax. This is the racism of the 21st century, and should be stigmatised just as much. The working class will recognise Ed Miliband's leadership at Kyoto and elsewhere on this burning issue, and will reward him handsomely for it.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP worship the false idol of 'merit' instead of relying on quotas and shortlists to impose equality on society in terms of gender and ethnicity. How can we have equality without quotas? This too should be forbidden by law. We will fund the campaign for this equalities act with a bankers' bonus tax. Our great deputy leader Harrier Harman has already gone part of the way into enshrining this this fundamental principle into law with her marvellous Equalities Act, and Labour will be rewarded for time immemorial. They will reward us just as they reward us for being the party of the Welfare State.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories and the BNP want Britain to leave or renegotiate our membership of the EU. This cannot be allowed. We should reject the Anglophile, atlanticist alliances which have betrayed Britain, and instead, help the poor of Greece and Portugal out of their plight by picking up the tab for their welfare state; we can pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax.

    Ed Miliband will adorn the annals of Labour party history, alongside other great leaders in the Labour pantheon. Ed Miliband will stand alongside Keir Hardie, Clement Attlee, and Gordon Brown.

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/conference/2007/09/labour-majority-increase
  • Options
    corporealcorporeal Posts: 2,549

    Mr. Gin, indeed, I was also thinking of the way the pro-coalition Lib Dems spent a lot of time publicly disagreeing with their coalition partners. Didn't look clever at the time and it's hard to claim credit when you spend months and years criticising the major partner of government.



    You only find that by very selectively looking at some things the Lib Dems said and ignoring a lot of things Tories said.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 2014
    I read ProudToBeLabour's piece - and immediately wondered if this is a troll at CCHQ having a laugh with his mates. Either that or some earnest commie is badly in need of a sense of humour bypass.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    Just waiting for Sunil to post a spoof of that now!
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,882

    Under the leadership of Ed Miliband, Labour are on course to win a historic majority in 2015.

    The Tory toffs will deeply regret privatising the NHS. No doubt they thought the Bedroom Tax was a jolly wheeze on the Playing Fields of Eton. I am sure that Gideon Osborne's VAT increase will have sparked many a 'well done, old chap' over cigars and port at the Bullingdon Club.

    Hardworking people up and down the country are worried about the Cost of Living Crisis. That's why Labour will cut the price of gas. That's why Labour will cut the price of rent. We will pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax. What did the Tories do? A tax cut for millionaires!

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP deny Climate Change, and therefore deny the solutions that are necessary in solving it, such as a bankers' bonus tax. This is the racism of the 21st century, and should be stigmatised just as much. The working class will recognise Ed Miliband's leadership at Kyoto and elsewhere on this burning issue, and will reward him handsomely for it.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories, and the BNP worship the false idol of 'merit' instead of relying on quotas and shortlists to impose equality on society in terms of gender and ethnicity. How can we have equality without quotas? This too should be forbidden by law. We will fund the campaign for this equalities act with a bankers' bonus tax. Our great deputy leader Harrier Harman has already gone part of the way into enshrining this this fundamental principle into law with her marvellous Equalities Act, and Labour will be rewarded for time immemorial. They will reward us just as they reward us for being the party of the Welfare State.

    Reactionary parties such as UKIP, the Tories and the BNP want Britain to leave or renegotiate our membership of the EU. This cannot be allowed. We should reject the Anglophile, atlanticist alliances which have betrayed Britain, and instead, help the poor of Greece and Portugal out of their plight by picking up the tab for their welfare state; we can pay for it with a bankers' bonus tax.

    Ed Miliband will adorn the annals of Labour party history, alongside other great leaders in the Labour pantheon. Ed Miliband will stand alongside Keir Hardie, Clement Attlee, and Gordon Brown.

    Things can only get better.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?
  • Options
    JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    In about 2 weeks

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,998
    Mr. Patrick, Mr. Royale, it's quite the parody. Reading sarcasm and mockery online can be tricky, but I read it as a 100% piss take, and huzzah for that.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    RobD said:

    Just waiting for Sunil to post a spoof of that now!

    I'm intensely jealous that I didn't come up with that!
  • Options
    CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 39,879
    edited May 2014
    DavidL said:

    Talk of Better Together reminds me of how graceless and grumpy Alex Salmond was on the telly last night. I know Scotland is a different country, but that can't have been appealing to many people anywhere, can it?

    Agreed. Not one of his better efforts. One of the strangest results on a strange night is UKIP coming from nowhere to win a seat in Scotland AND the tory vote rising at the same time (albeit by MoE levels).

    Where did the UKIP supporters come from? It would be fascinating to know. The obvious answer is ex Lib Dems and given what happened elsewhere I don't think that can be ruled out. I also wonder if some SNP supporters are not completely engaged with Salmond's love affair with the EU.

    Anyway with 63% of the votes for Unionist parties it was a good night for no.

    Not quite nowhere in vote terms (all percentage points, from memory)

    about 6% from previous time
    about 1.5% from BNP
    and about 4% from other parties - I suspect some Tory but also some Labour as well as the Europhobes from other parties. There must have been some shifting around to accommodate the displaced LDs.

    [edit - actually a little less than 4%, arithmetic a bit rusty!]

  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,942
    DavidL said:

    Talk of Better Together reminds me of how graceless and grumpy Alex Salmond was on the telly last night. I know Scotland is a different country, but that can't have been appealing to many people anywhere, can it?

    Agreed. Not one of his better efforts. One of the strangest results on a strange night is UKIP coming from nowhere to win a seat in Scotland AND the tory vote rising at the same time (albeit by MoE levels).

    Where did the UKIP supporters come from? It would be fascinating to know. The obvious answer is ex Lib Dems and given what happened elsewhere I don't think that can be ruled out. I also wonder if some SNP supporters are not completely engaged with Salmond's love affair with the EU.

    Anyway with 63% of the votes for Unionist parties it was a good night for no.

    Scotland has as many UKIP MEPs as London which, unlike Scotland, returned a Green MEP. It's hardly a different country, is it?

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,486
    Patrick said:

    I read ProudToBeLabour's piece - and immediately wondered if this is a troll at CCHQ having a laugh with his mates. Either that or some earnest commie is badly in need of a sense of humour bypass.

    Whoever wrote it, I'd like to thank them for giving me a blimmin' good laugh on a bk holiday Monday afternoon:

    "The working class will recognise Ed Miliband's leadership at Kyoto and elsewhere on this burning issue, and will reward him handsomely for it."

    I almost spat out my beer whilst reading that.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,356
    Patrick said:

    I read ProudToBeLabour's piece - and immediately wondered if this is a troll at CCHQ having a laugh with his mates. Either that or some earnest commie is badly in need of a sense of humour bypass.

    Of course it is a joke. It mentions paying for things 3x. Labour politicians and supporters don't do that. A clear tell.

  • Options
    corporealcorporeal Posts: 2,549
    JBriskin said:

    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    In about 2 weeks

    Right now I'm trying to a thread explaining why support for staying in the EU has risen alongside support for UKIP.

    Bit of a headscratcher so I'm trying out a few theories.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377

    RodCrosby said:

    isam said:

    RodCrosby said:

    anyone got the pb email for a guest article?

    Be sure not to mention that UKIP did well last night
    UKIP did very well.... under PR in an election that doesn't matter, on a half-arsed turnout...

    My article is about the next real election in 2015. It doesn't mention UKIP, or the LibDems.
    In that case, do GEs really "matter", given that so much of our governance originates in Brussels?
    UK general elections decide which ministers the UK sends to Brussels to decide what laws will and won't originate there, so yes, they do matter.
    Ah, so about as "jokey" (per Antifrank) as the Euro Parliament.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    corporeal said:

    JBriskin said:

    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    In about 2 weeks

    Right now I'm trying to a thread explaining why support for staying in the EU has risen alongside support for UKIP.

    Bit of a headscratcher so I'm trying out a few theories.
    I'd rather trust the REAL Nationwide figures from last Thursday, than some "opinion" "poll" :)
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,882
    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    We may or may not get a Newark going UKIP thread, but whats absoluely certain is that we won't get a Newark going Labour thread even though Tony won it in 97.

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985

    RobD said:

    Just waiting for Sunil to post a spoof of that now!

    I'm intensely jealous that I didn't come up with that!
    Whenever I hear Queen's One Vision I can't not think of Ed!
  • Options
    No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 3,845
    DavidL said:

    Talk of Better Together reminds me of how graceless and grumpy Alex Salmond was on the telly last night. I know Scotland is a different country, but that can't have been appealing to many people anywhere, can it?

    Agreed. Not one of his better efforts. One of the strangest results on a strange night is UKIP coming from nowhere to win a seat in Scotland AND the tory vote rising at the same time (albeit by MoE levels).

    Where did the UKIP supporters come from? It would be fascinating to know. The obvious answer is ex Lib Dems and given what happened elsewhere I don't think that can be ruled out. I also wonder if some SNP supporters are not completely engaged with Salmond's love affair with the EU.

    Anyway with 63% of the votes for Unionist parties it was a good night for no.

    Yes, the Scottish result was strange. The Tory vote was up marginally and even the LD vote was holding up slightly better than elsewhere in the Northern seats with LD incumbents.

    I think the difference between the two sides of the border is this:

    England first-
    UKIP say everything today is crap and getting worse, and immigrants/EU are to blame.
    The press say everything is crap and getting worse, and immigrants/EU are to blame.
    Labour say everything is crap and getting worse, and the Coalition is to blame.
    Coalition say everything is getting better, and the Coalition is the reason.

    But in Scotland-
    UKIP say everything today is crap and getting worse, and immigrants/EU are to blame.
    The press say everything is crap and getting worse, and the SNP are to blame.
    Labour say everything is crap and getting worse, and the SNP and the Coalition are to blame.
    Coalition say everything is getting better, and the Coalition is the reason.
    SNP say everything is getting better, and the SNP is the reason.

  • Options
    JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
    edited May 2014
    corporeal said:

    JBriskin said:

    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    In about 2 weeks

    Right now I'm trying to a thread explaining why support for staying in the EU has risen alongside support for UKIP.

    Bit of a headscratcher so I'm trying out a few theories.
    It's all about the fags (non-swear) and booze Corporeal.

  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,942
    corporeal said:

    JBriskin said:

    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    In about 2 weeks

    Right now I'm trying to a thread explaining why support for staying in the EU has risen alongside support for UKIP.

    Bit of a headscratcher so I'm trying out a few theories.

    My guess is because UKIP repels as much as it attracts. Also, it may be an indicator of an improving economy.

  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,377
    Jason Beattie ‏@JBeattieMirror ·1 hr
    Spanish socialist leader quits after losing 9 of 23 MEPs. Clegg loses 10 of 11 Lib Dem MEPs....
  • Options
    I'm tempted to open a new Vanilla account called ProudToBeALibDem and create a beardy yoghurt knitting diatribe. Anybody care to write this for me? Quotes/bullets/paras/soundbites all gratefully received!
  • Options
    corporealcorporeal Posts: 2,549

    corporeal said:

    JBriskin said:

    surbiton said:

    When are we going to get a Newark going UKIP thread ?

    In about 2 weeks

    Right now I'm trying to a thread explaining why support for staying in the EU has risen alongside support for UKIP.

    Bit of a headscratcher so I'm trying out a few theories.

    My guess is because UKIP repels as much as it attracts. Also, it may be an indicator of an improving economy.

    Probably, Farage already admitted something like that in an interview, and said he wouldn't lead a referendum campaign because of it.

    May end up with a 'Why Nigel Farage will be the reason the UK stays in the EU" angle.
This discussion has been closed.