Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Today’s Populus poll should at least calm some nerves in th

1235»

Comments

  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Richard_Nabavi
    I lived through it,
    And tell me? what did deregulation of your casino, and underinvestment in our manufacturing lead to?
    You lift "your" blinkers .
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,126
    Ninoinoz What foreign policy disaster was that? Major won more votes than any other PM in history in 1992 and a majority against the odds, he was perfectly entitled to serve out his term
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820

    Cameron gave that guarantee and was backed up by Hague with his 'We shall not let matters rest there'.

    They did of course, thus proving themselves liars.

    Yeah, yeah, 'we shall not let matters rest there' is a cast-iron guarantee of a futile post-ratification referendum.

    Jeez, you guys want to be taken seriously?
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    Smarmeron said:

    @GIN1138
    As we shouted loudly at the time. a country that makes nothing is a country heading to the wall.
    Our economy under Thatcher and her idiot friend (and aided by a brain dead ex film star) based itself on running a huge casino.....fortunately for the Yanks, even they started to do some simple maths. Our clever Eton boys were to busy inserting their pencils into their orifices and selling the family silver. (Brown sold the gold later)

    By "casino" I assume you mean proprietary trading. Out of curiousity, how much of our GDP do you think proprierty trading accounts for?
  • Options
    NinoinozNinoinoz Posts: 1,312
    HYUFD said:

    Ninoinoz What foreign policy disaster was that? Major won more votes than any other PM in history in 1992 and a majority against the odds, he was perfectly entitled to serve out his term

    The ERM debacle?

    And Major was only on the ballot in Huntingdon.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited May 2014
    Smarmeron said:


    And tell me? what did deregulation of your casino, and underinvestment in our manufacturing lead to?

    Well, the removal of restrictive practices in the City led to quarter of a century of unprecedented prosperity and made London THE centre for business services in the timezone, the reforms in business rescued us from being the 'sick man of Europe' to being the most dynamic economy in Europe - we now even have a thriving car manufacturing sector - the trade union reforms rescued us from a climate of the most horrific violent intimidation and 29.5 million working days lost in strikes to around 0.7 million. Not bad, eh? Do you really want to go back to the Winter of Discontent?
  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Socrates

    Our service sector is the largest part of our gdp, basically it is a faith generating machine. it rarely makes anything useful.


    I love how a great many atheist shout about god being "faith based" yet the same people believe money is real.
    Btw, that's why our "recovery" is so strong, All the countries service sectors were particularly hard hit, but we relied on it more than others, so we fell further.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 30,991

    Cameron gave that guarantee and was backed up by Hague with his 'We shall not let matters rest there'.

    They did of course, thus proving themselves liars.

    Yeah, yeah, 'we shall not let matters rest there' is a cast-iron guarantee of a futile post-ratification referendum.

    Jeez, you guys want to be taken seriously?
    Look in the mirror Richard. One of the main reasons UKIP are doing so well is because the Tories are no longer taken seriously. Led by a man with no morals and no spine. With any luck in a few years you will be following the Lib Dems into oblivion.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    HYUFD said:

    AndyJS Indeed, he was two years' ahead of me at school

    I thought only cricketers went to Tonbridge!

  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,894
    This is a sad story;

    http://news.sky.com/story/1263295/couple-took-overdose-to-delay-extradition

    Not sure where I stand really, though after the way the US has behaved with Ms. Knox I'd always be tempted to tell America to clear off, tbh.
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    Now my county sherriff is leaving me messages to vote for some guy as the next US Senator from Georgia.

    It's difficult to take seriously any plea from a man whose first name is Butch.

    Roll on Tuesday and this will all be over. 39 messages today.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,126
    Ninoinoz Hardly Major alone, he took the UK in with Thatcher's approval and the full endorsement of Kinnock and Ashdown. The 1992 election was Major's triumph, Kinnock would have beaten Thatcher, Heseltine, maybe Hurd, would have split the party on Europe even before the election
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,451
    HYUFD said:

    ToryJim Today was an Indian equivalent of 1945 or 1997, Congress will be out for at least another election

    Oh it was far worse than either. Congress now hold fewer than 10% of seats, and garnered the lowest vote share in their history. All in all pretty dire.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    Socrates said:

    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends.

    Garbage.

    Of course they are being treated unfairly. Welcome to the club. And it's not as though UKIP have been shy at treating other parties unfairly, is it? Remind me - did Farage object when Peter Cruddas, or Maria Miller, or Andrew Mitchell, was being treated abysmally by the press?

    Personally, I am just laughing at UKIP's reaction to the scrutiny and mud-slinging. It's the 'we're not politicians like all the rest' from a leader who has been a professional politician for 15 years - and one particularly well oiled on the Brussels gravy train - which is the funniest bit.
  • Options
    NinoinozNinoinoz Posts: 1,312
    HYUFD said:

    Ninoinoz Hardly Major alone, he took the UK in with Thatcher's approval and the full endorsement of Kinnock and Ashdown. The 1992 election was Major's triumph, Kinnock would have beaten Thatcher, Heseltine, maybe Hurd, would have split the party on Europe even before the election

    Major kept us in the ERM, though.

    And the Tories haven't won a majority since. Some triumph!
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820

    Look in the mirror Richard. One of the main reasons UKIP are doing so well is because the Tories are no longer taken seriously. Led by a man with no morals and no spine. With any luck in a few years you will be following the Lib Dems into oblivion.

    I don't need to look in the mirror, I can see perfectly well that you have no answer to my point so have resorted to throwing insults.

    So, once again: do you REALLY maintain that 'we shall not let matters rest there' is a cast-iron guarantee of a futile post-ratification referendum? Come on: let's hear the answer: yes or no?
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Oh dear, the graffiti artists have been out and about.

    No it is not Banksy.

    http://bit.ly/1lscZTR
  • Options
    perdixperdix Posts: 1,806

    Cameron gave that guarantee and was backed up by Hague with his 'We shall not let matters rest there'.

    They did of course, thus proving themselves liars.

    Yeah, yeah, 'we shall not let matters rest there' is a cast-iron guarantee of a futile post-ratification referendum.

    Jeez, you guys want to be taken seriously?
    Look in the mirror Richard. One of the main reasons UKIP are doing so well is because the Tories are no longer taken seriously. Led by a man with no morals and no spine. With any luck in a few years you will be following the Lib Dems into oblivion.
    "Led by a man with no morals and no spine". Cam is basically an honest guy who has braved much fury by sticking up for unpopular policies. Kippers are agin everything but have no coherent view of how they would use power.

  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,451
    Socrates said:

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
    It would have been odd to support a voting system that we don't agree with on principle. Political parties rarely fight for other peoples principles.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
    It would have been odd to support a voting system that we don't agree with on principle. Political parties rarely fight for other peoples principles.
    The more common criticism is that the Tories were stupid not to back AV because it would have been in their partisan interests!
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,126
    AveryLP Yes, not just the Cowdreys and Ed Smith, Patrick Mayheh, former Hammersmith and Fulham MP Matthew Coleman, Frederick Forsyth, EM Forster, Dan Stevens, David Tomlinson, former HSBC chairman John Bond, Gerald Corbett also OTs
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,126
    Ninoinoz The defeats of Hague and Howard, and the failure of Cameron to win outright were not down to Major
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
    It would have been odd to support a voting system that we don't agree with on principle. Political parties rarely fight for other peoples principles.
    Go on then. What was 'the principle'...?

    :roll
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,451

    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
    It would have been odd to support a voting system that we don't agree with on principle. Political parties rarely fight for other peoples principles.
    The more common criticism is that the Tories were stupid not to back AV because it would have been in their partisan interests!
    Oh I know, but putting party before country is a scoundrels way of conducting himself.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    John Gummer famously left the Anglican Church in 1994 over the issue of female vicars (along with Ann Widdecombe).
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,126
    ToryJim In 1997 the Tories got the lowest voteshare since 1832, 13 years later they were back in government, even despite today's dire results the Congress remains India's main opposition party. With 44 seats they also have surpassed the 2 won by the Canadian Tories in 1993, a party also now back in government in Canada, the pendulum will swing eventually
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited May 2014
    AveryLP said:

    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    Tim_B said:

    AndyJS said:

    Greetings from Helsinki Airport. Odd feeling to arrive in a new country for the first time.

    Sounds like you expected to be somewhere else :-)

    @AndyJS

    You will be heading the wrong way on the ferry! Make sure you don't get sucked into a late night as you will need to be up at 6.00 am to catch the run through the Stockholm archipelago!

    I don't mind getting up early to see it. Wasn't able to do it the other way round unfortunately.
    Andy

    Helsinki nightlife is a bit sparse. Only about ten or so bars are licensed to stay open to 3:00 am and most are attached to the big hotels.

    If you want a flavour of the city in the early hours try going to the (almost) all night café in a very small hotel opposite the very large Hotel Vaakuna near the Central Station. The café is called Ravintola (restaurant) Seurahuone.

    Not much booze but excellent Columbian coffee and a chance to eat the great Finnish café delicacy: a sort of moccasin pastry shoe filled with rice. Wonderful people watching too.

    Ravintola Surahuone is on Brunnsgatan off Mannerheimintie (the sole wide dual roadway in the centre).

    Thanks, I'm staying at the hotel you recommended tomorrow night. Being a bit of a plagiarist I'm afraid!
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    RodCrosby said:

    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you² ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
    It would have been odd to support a voting system that we don't agree with on principle. Political parties rarely fight for other peoples principles.
    Go on then. What was 'the principle'...?

    :roll
    PR² wasn't on offer, Sir Roderick.

    Otherwise we might have been very principled.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    RobD said:

    Thought some PBers might enjoy this, my office view for the next week, sunset over the (distant) Pacific:

    http://i.imgur.com/QdPFGX5.jpg

    Where are you ?

    Chile, California ?
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737

    ToryJim said:

    Socrates said:

    O'Brien specifically lied this afternoon by making a false statement and then when challenged on it maintaining he was correct.

    So much the same as the Kippers, and in particular you, claiming that Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to hold a referendum even after ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    That's politics, is it not?
    Politics that the media always does to the UKIP leader but hardly ever to anyone else. You Tories know full well that UKIP are being unfairly treated, but you ignore it anyway because it suits your partisan ends. It's like the whole debate over AV, where you backed political advantage over principle and have now ended up being bitten by the unfairness of it.
    It would have been odd to support a voting system that we don't agree with on principle. Political parties rarely fight for other peoples principles.
    The more common criticism is that the Tories were stupid not to back AV because it would have been in their partisan interests!
    I did try to tell them...
    http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2011/04/25/be-careful-what-you-wish-for-av-through-the-looking-glass/
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    Tim_B said:

    AndyJS said:

    Greetings from Helsinki Airport. Odd feeling to arrive in a new country for the first time.

    Sounds like you expected to be somewhere else :-)

    @AndyJS

    You will be heading the wrong way on the ferry! Make sure you don't get sucked into a late night as you will need to be up at 6.00 am to catch the run through the Stockholm archipelago!

    I don't mind getting up early to see it. Wasn't able to do it the other way round unfortunately.
    Andy

    Helsinki nightlife is a bit sparse. Only about ten or so bars are licensed to stay open to 3:00 am and most are attached to the big hotels.

    If you want a flavour of the city in the early hours try going to the (almost) all night café in a very small hotel opposite the very large Hotel Vaakuna near the Central Station. The café is called Ravintola (restaurant) Seurahuone.

    Not much booze but excellent Columbian coffee and a chance to eat the great Finnish café delicacy: a sort of moccasin pastry shoe filled with rice. Wonderful people watching too.

    Ravintola Surahuone is on Brunnsgatan off Mannerheimintie (the sole wide dual roadway in the centre).

    Thanks, I'm staying at the hotel you recommended tomorrow night. Being a bit of a plagiarist I'm afraid!
    Travel is best based half on research and half on self-discovery.

    Apart from having a real sauna, eating at a Russian restaurant and walking around the very small centre there is not a lot more compulsory on the list!

  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Link to the Farage interview:

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pyYoL9ngtE
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,894
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,987
    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    Thought some PBers might enjoy this, my office view for the next week, sunset over the (distant) Pacific:

    http://i.imgur.com/QdPFGX5.jpg

    Where are you ?

    Chile, California ?
    Down in Chile!
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    GIN1138 said:
    The first two comments are fun:

    Cooper1992 • 5 hours ago
    Mr Nelson, could we please have graphs for Mr Hollande's Socialist Miracle so that we can compare and contrast which system works best?

    Hello Cooper1992 • 5 hours ago
    You could always vote Miliband and find out for yourself.



  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @GIN1138

    At section five he omits the "self employment" miracle..
    Possibly an oversight, The miracle of not having to sign on, and risk sanctions, being paid more, plus the profit to the private job company for finding you work. (they are ever so helpful about showing the long term unemployed how to "maximize" work profit levels.....just like the big boys.
    The long term unemployed are great payers if you get one off the figures.....ask the head of the Bank of England.
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    Tim_B said:

    AndyJS said:

    Greetings from Helsinki Airport. Odd feeling to arrive in a new country for the first time.

    Sounds like you expected to be somewhere else :-)

    @AndyJS

    You will be heading the wrong way on the ferry! Make sure you don't get sucked into a late night as you will need to be up at 6.00 am to catch the run through the Stockholm archipelago!

    I don't mind getting up early to see it. Wasn't able to do it the other way round unfortunately.
    Andy

    Helsinki nightlife is a bit sparse. Only about ten or so bars are licensed to stay open to 3:00 am and most are attached to the big hotels.

    If you want a flavour of the city in the early hours try going to the (almost) all night café in a very small hotel opposite the very large Hotel Vaakuna near the Central Station. The café is called Ravintola (restaurant) Seurahuone.

    Not much booze but excellent Columbian coffee and a chance to eat the great Finnish café delicacy: a sort of moccasin pastry shoe filled with rice. Wonderful people watching too.

    Ravintola Surahuone is on Brunnsgatan off Mannerheimintie (the sole wide dual roadway in the centre).

    Thanks, I'm staying at the hotel you recommended tomorrow night. Being a bit of a plagiarist I'm afraid!
    Some years back I spent some time working in Copenhagen. For some reason I always seemed to get booked in a hotel in Malmo (this was the late 90s before the bridge was built).

    Sounds like Malmo and Hesinki should be twinned :-)
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,987
    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    AndyJS said:

    AveryLP said:

    Tim_B said:

    AndyJS said:

    Greetings from Helsinki Airport. Odd feeling to arrive in a new country for the first time.

    Sounds like you expected to be somewhere else :-)

    @AndyJS

    You will be heading the wrong way on the ferry! Make sure you don't get sucked into a late night as you will need to be up at 6.00 am to catch the run through the Stockholm archipelago!

    I don't mind getting up early to see it. Wasn't able to do it the other way round unfortunately.
    Andy

    Helsinki nightlife is a bit sparse. Only about ten or so bars are licensed to stay open to 3:00 am and most are attached to the big hotels.

    If you want a flavour of the city in the early hours try going to the (almost) all night café in a very small hotel opposite the very large Hotel Vaakuna near the Central Station. The café is called Ravintola (restaurant) Seurahuone.

    Not much booze but excellent Columbian coffee and a chance to eat the great Finnish café delicacy: a sort of moccasin pastry shoe filled with rice. Wonderful people watching too.

    Ravintola Surahuone is on Brunnsgatan off Mannerheimintie (the sole wide dual roadway in the centre).

    Thanks, I'm staying at the hotel you recommended tomorrow night. Being a bit of a plagiarist I'm afraid!
    What else are recommendations for!
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    RobD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    Thought some PBers might enjoy this, my office view for the next week, sunset over the (distant) Pacific:

    http://i.imgur.com/QdPFGX5.jpg

    Where are you ?

    Chile, California ?
    Down in Chile!
    Nice !

    High and dry and perfect skies.

  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,396
    Evening all, back in the UK after three weeks in India :)
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983
    GIN1138 said:

    On Faragegate, I can't work out why O'Flynn butted in to the interview when the presenter had made clear he was rounding things up anyway?

    Presumably he'd been getting more and more angry with the way the interview was going and couldn't control himself in the end, but it seems very unprofessional.

    If he was any good as a PR, instead of getting so worked up he couldn't control himself, he should have been on to the Councillor allegations at the start of the interview. Imagine if Farage had been able to counter the accusation that the candidate was a UKIP Councillor when infact he wasn't? Would have really turned the tables.

    I agree, it wouldn't have took long for o Flynn to expose o briens lies and turn the tables on him. How I wish I was the man on the spot! He could've done better
  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    Lesson one for the unemployed...
    To claim job-seekers allowance you have to fill out five vacancies a week, and a list of your activities.
    Get put on a scheme, become "self employed", grab whatever grants you can....then fill in one sheet detailing how many hours you worked the previous month, have a look at what constitutes "work", then apply a little creative accountancy to make it....say 40 hours, but with almost no income...do not pass the job centre, collect full whack in tax credits... and no one checks.
    Fun and profit for all.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited May 2014
    The 3 most recent Euro polls have had different parties in the lead: Tories 1%, UKIP 2%, Labour 3%. None of them put them Tories in second place.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    Evening all, back in the UK after three weeks in India :)

    Welcome back, what so you think of the Indian election result?
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669

    Evening all, back in the UK after three weeks in India :)

    I don't know what it was you did, but that seems like a savage punishment :-)

  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    Previous post should have said 40 hours a week (with plausible variations of course)
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    Oh look, Crimean Tatars face persecution under the new Russian regime:

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/16/vladimir-putin-crimea-tatars-russian-ukraine
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,396
    AndyJS said:

    Evening all, back in the UK after three weeks in India :)

    Welcome back, what so you think of the Indian election result?
    Well I was in Kerala, India's most literate state and where the BJP won zero seats out of 20 :)

    @TimB

    I was primarily out there for my brother's wedding. A Hindu ceremony, but thankfully not too drawn out!
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,894
    AveryLP said:

    GIN1138 said:
    The first two comments are fun:

    Cooper1992 • 5 hours ago
    Mr Nelson, could we please have graphs for Mr Hollande's Socialist Miracle so that we can compare and contrast which system works best?

    Hello Cooper1992 • 5 hours ago
    You could always vote Miliband and find out for yourself.



    Yes, made me chuckle.
  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    With our economy racing ahead in the fast lane.......does anyone wonder when the anti inflation brakes will be applied?
  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    edited May 2014
    I feel sure there was some sort of "level of unemployment" rule........but it got mislaid I heard.
    Still, with the fall in unemployment, and the fact that "work will always pay" there must be some upward pressure?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    Rates will rise in 2015. At a guess I'd say March.
  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949
    Smarmeron said:

    With our economy racing ahead in the fast lane.......does anyone wonder when the anti inflation brakes will be applied?

    Do you mean an interest rate rise? Smart money says Q1 2015, though there's some uncertainty.
  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Quincel and Pulpstar

    With wages for the majority not expected to recover till 2020 it better be tiny?

    "Oh look mummy, there goes a old lady with no clothes!"
    "It's all right darling, she lives in Threadneedle Street"
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    Smarmeron said:

    @Quincel and Pulpstar

    With wages for the majority not expected to recover till 2020 it better be tiny?

    "Oh look mummy, there goes a old lady with no clothes!"
    "It's all right darling, she lives in Threadneedle Street"

    Haha I don't want a rate rise either tbh but it will probably happen. 1/4 of a point maybe ?
  • Options
    SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    @Pulpstar
    Be not affeared good sir,listen to the calming words of St Carney
  • Options
    old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    @Sunil_Prasannan‌
    Welcome back, Sunil! They don't to things by halves in India when they decide to get rid of an incumbent government.

    Evening all, back in the UK after three weeks in India :)

This discussion has been closed.