politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The big number to look for in this month’s upcoming Lord Ashcroft polling of the marginals
The big polling event of May 2014, exactly a year before general election, will be the publication by Lord Ashcroft of his latest mega sample polling of the marginals.
These opinion polls of marginals are always fascinating reading, despite the challenges of accurate polling in marginals specifically. And Lord Ashcroft's commentaries on them are always well-written and well thought out.
What will be the sample size in each of the marginal seats polled? IIRC last time it was fewer than 600. No disrespect to Lord A and his team but individual polling is much more problematic.
I'll stick with Dr. Robert Waller's general rule: that if national polling conflicts with that for marginals, it's the former that is more likely to be accurate. Wasn't that also the case in 2010?
You are not alone in that view - per the latest ICM Wisdom poll - this is what Martin Boon said about the previous poll (the latest isn't up on ICM yet):
Over time, there is one feature of the Wisdom trend that is irrefutable – Labour’s predicted share has pretty consistently declined from a high of 39% in May 2012, to pretty much where it stands now (33%). The Conservatives have flat-lined in the 29-32% range, which they will hope to break out of now that positive economic noises are being heard from many quarters.
Martin Boon, head of ICM Research, said the result represented the joint narrowest lead for Labour ever recorded in the Wisdom Index. “Both the main parties are polling much lower than they would hope for,” he said. “This different polling approach provides further evidence that, at last, the Tories are making in-roads into the Labour vote.” However, the shift is due to a loss of support for Labour as the Conservatives remain stuck on 31 per cent, he said.
One thing I noticed in the Telegraph reporting of this - the description 'Ed Miliband's Labour' - we know 'David Cameron's Conservatives' helps the Conservatives, I wonder if the reverse is true for Labour?
I wonder if this poll will be brave enough to predict how many MPs Ukip will get ?
If it's the same format as last time, it will be polling the 40 most marginal Conservative seats. We should get to see what chance UKIP have in Thurrock, Waveney and Hastings & Rye, if Lord Ashcroft has the data to look at constituencies individually.
The marginals would seem to hinder the Conservatives. However, it's worth noting that UKIP are riding high, and that tide may well recede come the General Election.
I'm sure TSE has seen the funny side in it being the Eagles biting his footie team on the bum?
In the interest of TSE's sanity please do not mention Liverpool's humiliating performance against Palace last night when they threw away a 0-3 lead and saw their premiership hopes reduced to tatters
I'm sure TSE has seen the funny side in it being the Eagles biting his footie team on the bum?
In the interest of TSE's sanity please do not mention Liverpool's humiliating performance against Palace last night when they threw away a 0-3 lead and saw their premiership hopes reduced to tatters
Stop putting a positive spin on the result it will only make it harder for TSE.
The marginals would seem to hinder the Conservatives. However, it's worth noting that UKIP are riding high, and that tide may well recede come the General Election.
The function of UKIP is to provide a hostel for voters on their way from deserting Labour to attaching themselves to the Tories. After all, if enough Peebies say it, it must become true...
The Tories flatline or rise very slightly. Labour continues its slow but relentless decline. And so we are in crossover territory or thereabouts. What will make or break the GE is how the numbers move in the run up to the day itself. We'll see alot more of MIliband on TV, and Balls too. And Dave. And Clegg. We'll also know what the Labour manifesto contains.
So....my best guess is a Tory lead of not enough for a majority. Hung parliament and the current coalition continues.
As a Man U fan I finally have something to be cheerful about this morning. It isn't much and it has been a terrible year but we gather our pleasures where we may.
IIRC the tories outperformed the Universal swing at the last election, presumably doing better in the marginals to do so. I suspect this shows 2 things. First, the tories are more vulnerable where they outperformed and second that these marginals are more volatile than the average.
The result of neither of these terribly surprising conclusions is that where there is a swing against the tories in the national polls they seem to be doing worse in these seats. What that actually tells us about the possible outcome of a GE I would be a lot less sure about. These seats will probably give us a slightly exaggerated result again whichever way the election goes. I do not accept that as a generality the tories have particular problems in these seats.
The marginals would seem to hinder the Conservatives. However, it's worth noting that UKIP are riding high, and that tide may well recede come the General Election.
The function of UKIP is to provide a hostel for voters on their way from deserting Labour to attaching themselves to the Tories. After all, if enough Peebies say it, it must become true...
I agree @Innocent_Abroad, too much nonsense written about UKIPs demise or shrinkage after May 22nd elections. These are the hopes of the Lab/Lib/Con tribe. They are desperate that these hopes come true. If not, their whole world will collapse: may it be so.
Mr. Smithson, that does assume UKIP sink back to irrelevance. It's quite hard to tell what UKIP's polling will be come the election, and how that'll affect the results.
Worth also noting that the circuit will be hard on tyres, which may hamper Ferrari and Williams (those teams had to make an extra stop in Bahrain compared to the drivers ahead of them).
Good morning all and enjoying the latest Antifrank analyses. If I read him correctly there are fewer seats in the round than some would suggest. All quiet on the IndyRef front today so guess my YESNP friends are still hungover from the excitement of the Sunday Herald coming out in favour because both its readers say YES.
I wonder if this poll will be brave enough to predict how many MPs Ukip will get ?
If it's the same format as last time, it will be polling the 40 most marginal Conservative seats. We should get to see what chance UKIP have in Thurrock, Waveney and Hastings & Rye, if Lord Ashcroft has the data to look at constituencies individually.
Funny you should mention Thurrock, cos Shadsy has just shortened his UKIP price there to 7/1 (from 20/1) !
Good morning all and enjoying the latest Antifrank analyses. If I read him correctly there are fewer seats in the round than some would suggest. All quiet on the IndyRef front today so guess my YESNP friends are still hungover from the excitement of the Sunday Herald coming out in favour because both its readers say YES.
In fairness Easterross I don't think either of their readers were specifically asked and one of them, who was at dinner with me last night, is no longer a subscriber.
I'm sure TSE has seen the funny side in it being the Eagles biting his footie team on the bum?
In the interest of TSE's sanity please do not mention Liverpool's humiliating performance against Palace last night when they threw away a 0-3 lead and saw their premiership hopes reduced to tatters
I don't follow football. To stop me mistakenly mentioning or quoting something that might cause TSE pain, hurt and humiliation, can you make it clearer the sort of things that I should not mention?
I wonder if this poll will be brave enough to predict how many MPs Ukip will get ?
If it's the same format as last time, it will be polling the 40 most marginal Conservative seats. We should get to see what chance UKIP have in Thurrock, Waveney and Hastings & Rye, if Lord Ashcroft has the data to look at constituencies individually.
Funny you should mention Thurrock, cos Shadsy has just shortened his UKIP price there to 7/1 (from 20/1) !
Has Farage finally committed himself? What else would account for such a large move?
I wonder if this poll will be brave enough to predict how many MPs Ukip will get ?
If it's the same format as last time, it will be polling the 40 most marginal Conservative seats. We should get to see what chance UKIP have in Thurrock, Waveney and Hastings & Rye, if Lord Ashcroft has the data to look at constituencies individually.
Funny you should mention Thurrock, cos Shadsy has just shortened his UKIP price there to 7/1 (from 20/1) !
Has Farage finally committed himself? What else would account for such a large move?
What will be the sample size in each of the marginal seats polled? IIRC last time it was fewer than 600. No disrespect to Lord A and his team but individual polling is much more problematic.
I'll stick with Dr. Robert Waller's general rule: that if national polling conflicts with that for marginals, it's the former that is more likely to be accurate. Wasn't that also the case in 2010?
A national poll has fewer than 5 samples per constituency . Clearly a large sample of marginals with 500 or so in each marginal will have a lower MofE than the national poll .
Remember that the Tories need to be 6%+ ahead on votes just to stop bleeding seats to LAB. Even after a cross over LAB could secure a majority
No the Tories just need to have the number of Labour votes +1 in each of 326 constituencies and not lose any to the LibDems to win. That may or may not equate to a lead of 6+% in the polls.
I'm sure TSE has seen the funny side in it being the Eagles biting his footie team on the bum?
In the interest of TSE's sanity please do not mention Liverpool's humiliating performance against Palace last night when they threw away a 0-3 lead and saw their premiership hopes reduced to tatters
I don't follow football. To stop me mistakenly mentioning or quoting something that might cause TSE pain, hurt and humiliation, can you make it clearer the sort of things that I should not mention?
I'd avoid the phrase "many a slip between cup and lip" for starters. That's been on the banned list for a few days. Now I'd steer clear of "soaring like an eagle" as well.
What will be the sample size in each of the marginal seats polled? IIRC last time it was fewer than 600. No disrespect to Lord A and his team but individual polling is much more problematic.
I'll stick with Dr. Robert Waller's general rule: that if national polling conflicts with that for marginals, it's the former that is more likely to be accurate. Wasn't that also the case in 2010?
A national poll has fewer than 5 samples per constituency . Clearly a large sample of marginals with 500 or so in each marginal will have a lower MofE than the national poll .
Don't wish to be rude but I would rather defer to the views of a noted psephologist and (former) pollster on these matters than your good self.
Remember that the Tories need to be 6%+ ahead on votes just to stop bleeding seats to LAB. Even after a cross over LAB could secure a majority
No the Tories just need to have the number of Labour votes +1 in each of 326 constituencies and not lose any to the LibDems to win. That may or may not equate to a lead of 6+% in the polls.
Mr. Observer, whilst the current polling is better for Labour, it is worth noting the independence debate *and* UKIP's significant and sustained rise both through new, unknown variables into the mix.
We cannot keep operating on the same basis as before, making predictions based on a country that might be about to split into two staying as one, and ignoring the rise of UKIP.
It'd be like ignoring pre-season testing and backing Vettel for the title (incidentally, there's an off-chance he will win it but I would be significantly surprised).
I'm sure TSE has seen the funny side in it being the Eagles biting his footie team on the bum?
In the interest of TSE's sanity please do not mention Liverpool's humiliating performance against Palace last night when they threw away a 0-3 lead and saw their premiership hopes reduced to tatters
I don't follow football. To stop me mistakenly mentioning or quoting something that might cause TSE pain, hurt and humiliation, can you make it clearer the sort of things that I should not mention?
I'd avoid the phrase "many a slip between cup and lip" for starters. That's been on the banned list for a few days. Now I'd steer clear of "soaring like an eagle" as well.
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory would be out too then?
I'm sure if we pool our resources we can stop TSE feeling liverish....
On the Sunday Herald endorsement, Prof Tomkins tweeted the respective circulations of the Sunday Herald and Sunday Post, adding the tag "#gamechanger" - I suspect he was being sarcastic....
Mr. Observer, whilst the current polling is better for Labour, it is worth noting the independence debate *and* UKIP's significant and sustained rise both through new, unknown variables into the mix.
We cannot keep operating on the same basis as before, making predictions based on a country that might be about to split into two staying as one, and ignoring the rise of UKIP.
It'd be like ignoring pre-season testing and backing Vettel for the title (incidentally, there's an off-chance he will win it but I would be significantly surprised).
Easteross is just factually incorrect. Even worse than you thinking Eric Bloodaxe was the last King of Yorkshire!!
The Tories have to "win" 326 seats by one vote; not just finish above Labour. It's no good finishing above Labour if they finish below UKIP.
The marginals would seem to hinder the Conservatives. However, it's worth noting that UKIP are riding high, and that tide may well recede come the General Election.
The function of UKIP is to provide a hostel for voters on their way from deserting Labour to attaching themselves to the Tories. After all, if enough Peebies say it, it must become true...
I agree @Innocent_Abroad, too much nonsense written about UKIPs demise or shrinkage after May 22nd elections. These are the hopes of the Lab/Lib/Con tribe. They are desperate that these hopes come true. If not, their whole world will collapse: may it be so.
Surely the error is to assume that Euro success will translate into Westminster success?
Aren't the polls quite clear that voters view the two very differently?
What will be the sample size in each of the marginal seats polled? IIRC last time it was fewer than 600. No disrespect to Lord A and his team but individual polling is much more problematic.
I'll stick with Dr. Robert Waller's general rule: that if national polling conflicts with that for marginals, it's the former that is more likely to be accurate. Wasn't that also the case in 2010?
A national poll has fewer than 5 samples per constituency . Clearly a large sample of marginals with 500 or so in each marginal will have a lower MofE than the national poll .
Don't wish to be rude but I would rather defer to the views of a noted psephologist and (former) pollster on these matters than your good self.
I think you are making up a general rule which my friend Robert did not make . If you go back to May 2009 , the national polls showing Conservatives with a 20% lead over Labour were a no more accurate forecast of the 2010 GE .
Remember that the Tories need to be 6%+ ahead on votes just to stop bleeding seats to LAB. Even after a cross over LAB could secure a majority
That's assuming incumbency and GOTV to defend the govt doesn't have an effect. With the Lib Drms polling sub 10, UNS would actually give the Tories a majority at less than a 6 lead in some circs too.
Edit - they could bleed 5 to Labour and gain 25 from the Lib Dems for example
Worth noting that the Conservatives target seats - their 40/48 strategy is different than the list of marginals that everyone else is using. Tory target seats seem to be based on where the constituency demographic will be favourable to them in 2015 rather than what it was like in 2010.
Remember that the Tories need to be 6%+ ahead on votes just to stop bleeding seats to LAB. Even after a cross over LAB could secure a majority
No the Tories just need to have the number of Labour votes +1 in each of 326 constituencies and not lose any to the LibDems to win. That may or may not equate to a lead of 6+% in the polls.
That is just so hopelessly wrong.
No, he is completely correct. The first sentence that is.
It is a racing certainty that a Tory Majority will correlate to a > 6+% lead in the polls though. So the second sentence is misleading at best.
This is how Labour did in their targets seats using the 2013 local election data. As you can see they missed some of their top targets including Waveney:
If they fail to win a majority next year it'll probably be because they've missed a fair number of those targets.
Andy, I agree with you. I think they are going to find it especially hard to win the "market town" seats. And I can see Thames Valley seats like Reading and Swindon proving well out of range.
Worth noting that the Conservatives target seats - their 40/48 strategy is different than the list of marginals that everyone else is using. Tory target seats seem to be based on where the constituency demographic will be favourable to them in 2015 rather than what it was like in 2010.
They'd be better off using the standard marginals' list IMO.
The trick in Ealing Central is to squeeze the Liberal vote until the pips squeak - they have a good shout. Many viscerally anti-Tory Red Liberals in that seat - lots of leftie professionals who fell for the Liberal Winning Here con last time only to see Labour run the Tories closer and the Tory come through the middle. It's a genuine three-way marginal - a rare fish indeed.
What will be the sample size in each of the marginal seats polled? IIRC last time it was fewer than 600. No disrespect to Lord A and his team but individual polling is much more problematic.
I'll stick with Dr. Robert Waller's general rule: that if national polling conflicts with that for marginals, it's the former that is more likely to be accurate. Wasn't that also the case in 2010?
A national poll has fewer than 5 samples per constituency . Clearly a large sample of marginals with 500 or so in each marginal will have a lower MofE than the national poll .
Don't wish to be rude but I would rather defer to the views of a noted psephologist and (former) pollster on these matters than your good self.
I think you are making up a general rule which my friend Robert did not make . If you go back to May 2009 , the national polls showing Conservatives with a 20% lead over Labour were a no more accurate forecast of the 2010 GE .
@MarkSenior - This is a note from Robert to me on the subject which I have posted here before:
"The problem with marginals polls (of which I've taken a few) is not with the sample size. That's often a red herring, as it doesn't matter how many people you talk to if they're not typical of all voters.
Therefore it's the 'sampling frame'. Assuming the poll is not random, and it won't be, the designers have to establish targets to set quotas to match with respondents. This is harder if it is not a standard national sample, as they have to find what is typical across 38 marginals, not the well known national figures that are regularly used.
As a result, I would agree that marginals are harder to get accurate polling in. (Of course, the sample size in individual marginals will also be very small, so it's useless for single seats within the group).
Overall, if the results of the poll across marginals suggests a different swing from that suggested by the whole weight of national polls, it's probable that it's the marginals poll that is wrong.
So I think you are probably right - though polling has certainly become more sophisticated since I last took one in 1992, so the Ashcroft people may have made a better fist of the sampling than we did in the old days!
By all means use me as an authority, though myself don't think I have much standing as one on polling nowadays ..."
This is how Labour did in their targets seats using the 2013 local election data. As you can see they missed some of their top targets including Waveney:
What we're all ignoring a bit is what might happen to the polls themselves as we see more of the Eds and their policies in the run up to the GE. That's when 99% of the population tune their 'once every 5 years' antenna onto politics. There is a real risk for Labour of polling meltdown when it becomes clear to all and not just politics anoraks that Labour are led by a drooling moron and have an incoherent ruinous mess of a manifesto. Be in no doubt - Labour are in for a serious monstering in a year's time.
The trick in Ealing Central is to squeeze the Liberal vote until the pips squeak - they have a good shout. Many viscerally anti-Tory Red Liberals in that seat - lots of leftie professionals who fell for the Liberal Winning Here con last time only to see Labour run the Tories closer and the Tory come through the middle. It's a genuine three-way marginal - a rare fish indeed.
How many in Ealing are now going to be worried about having to pay the Mansion Tax sometime though? It may be a modest number - but the majority in 2015 may well be a modest number....
If they fail to win a majority next year it'll probably be because they've missed a fair number of those targets.
Andy, I agree with you. I think they are going to find it especially hard to win the "market town" seats. And I can see Thames Valley seats like Reading and Swindon proving well out of range.
Of that list, I expect Labour to outperform in Thurrock, Waveney and Ealing Central & Acton and I'd expect them to underperform in Ipswich, Gloucester, Croydon Central and Stevenage. This is a relative assessment (they may take all six or none).
After completing my look at the east and south east tomorrow, I'll turn to the west midlands next.
I wonder if this poll will be brave enough to predict how many MPs Ukip will get ?
If it's the same format as last time, it will be polling the 40 most marginal Conservative seats. We should get to see what chance UKIP have in Thurrock, Waveney and Hastings & Rye, if Lord Ashcroft has the data to look at constituencies individually.
Funny you should mention Thurrock, cos Shadsy has just shortened his UKIP price there to 7/1 (from 20/1) !
I think that oddschecker has messed up actually, as it show UKIP being 20/1 but when you click on the price it is for South Basildon & East Thurrock
Ladbrokes have been 7/1 Thurrock for quite some time
Farage wont stand there, Tim Aker is the UKIP candidate. He is a local lad and also Head of Policy. He is on the Daily Politics quite often now
I'm not sure whether the 6% lead is going to be exactly right. One of the factors lies in the low turnout of Labour voters in safe seats (in other words, the vote count is artificially depressed, not the seat count raised) and faced with a "ConDem" government that might change. That won't help the Conservatives per se, but what it might mean is that the shift in national polls is explicable on this basis and not a change in marginals. However the marginal polling does not indicate that at the moment, if we assume it is accurate. But my point was I would not assume that 6% or close to it was inviable, in principle.
The expectation is that the private sector will create approximately 500K additional jobs this year. Really remarkable. If some of this bleeds into the seaside towns antifrank describes so well it may well make a difference.
The government will have an excellent story to tell on the economy at the next election. That might not matter if the Eds can persuade enough people that they are not sharing in the growth but I think the pressure will be on for Labour to have a persuasive story to tell and I have not heard it so far.
We have been through the longest fall in real wages on record. Given that and the strength of UKIP it is surprising that the tories are doing as well as they are. The challenge of putting together an election winning coalition remains daunting however.
This is how Labour did in their targets seats using the 2013 local election data. As you can see they missed some of their top targets including Waveney:
The trick in Ealing Central is to squeeze the Liberal vote until the pips squeak - they have a good shout. Many viscerally anti-Tory Red Liberals in that seat - lots of leftie professionals who fell for the Liberal Winning Here con last time only to see Labour run the Tories closer and the Tory come through the middle. It's a genuine three-way marginal - a rare fish indeed.
How many in Ealing are now going to be worried about having to pay the Mansion Tax sometime though? It may be a modest number - but the majority in 2015 may well be a modest number....
It's a factor in wealthy London suburban seats certainly, but as you say, I think the numbers of potential Red Liberals etc affected are still pretty low, even here.
Another good Services PMI, with this note on GDP and employment
"“The April numbers point to the economy growing by at least 0.8% again in the second quarter and, with confidence about the future rising again in April, there’s no end in sight for the current super-strong growth spell.
“The survey also brings news that private sector employment rose at a record pace in April, signalling 100,000 jobs being created each month."
Thurrock is one of the most unpredictable seats I think, mainly due to the high BNP and UKIP votes last time. The white working class vote is probably moving to the Tories (relatively speaking) but at the same time there's been an explosion in the African population over the last few years, increasing from roughly 1% to 10%.
Aren't the polls quite clear that voters view the two very differently?
Well, fairly differently. The number of UKIP supporters planning to revert in 2015 is IIRC 25% - more than for switchers to other parties, but not overwhelming. The figure should however be taken with caution both ways - if UKIP is seen as storming ahead, it might shrink; if it's seen as a busted flush, it might soar. I doubt if more than half the UKIP vote is going to go to any other party, though - the voters concerned think we are all seriously crap, and the choice is UKIP or abstain.
To offer a professional view on marginal polls vs national polls: it's a common fallacy to think that having a big poll is more important than having a balanced poll. If you poll 200,000 pensioners you'll get a less accurate picture of the national scene than if you poll a 2,000 weighted sample. The reason marginal polls have historically been misleading is that they've usually not weighted for the local population. For instance, Broxtowe has a smallish immigrant population (6%), so a poll there should have 6% or so immigrants, if this is thought important for voting intention, and if it accidentally has 1% or 12% it'll change the figures. That's also why studying subsamples in national polls doesn't work.
That said, my understanding is that the Ashcroft polls do try to weight for constituency populations, don't they? If so, then they're genuinely just as important as Mike says. The factor that we're appearing to see is the absence of first-term incumbency bonus for most Conservative MPs, perhaps because of the general feeling of disillusion with politicians. I was surprised to see them actually doing worse than the national polls, though, and it'll be odd if that's repeated.
I also wonder if FPTP only really works in the more binary world of two dominant parties. It looks like 2015 is going to throw up an absolute stinker of an outcome. I'm guessing it will be close to 35/35/15/15 but Labour having a large majority.
What we're all ignoring a bit is what might happen to the polls themselves as we see more of the Eds and their policies in the run up to the GE. That's when 99% of the population tune their 'once every 5 years' antenna onto politics. There is a real risk for Labour of polling meltdown when it becomes clear to all and not just politics anoraks that Labour are led by a drooling moron and have an incoherent ruinous mess of a manifesto. Be in no doubt - Labour are in for a serious monstering in a year's time.
Patrick - Well, which one is it ! Have you changed your mind in 3 months ?
As for the Thurrock price shortening my guess is iSam has taken a chunk of 20-1 so Shadsy is probably rebalancing his book there.
This is how Labour did in their targets seats using the 2013 local election data. As you can see they missed some of their top targets including Waveney:
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
I also wonder if FPTP only really works in the more binary world of two dominant parties. It looks like 2015 is going to throw up an absolute stinker of an outcome. I'm guessing it will be close to 35/35/15/15 but Labour having a large majority.
What we're all ignoring a bit is what might happen to the polls themselves as we see more of the Eds and their policies in the run up to the GE. That's when 99% of the population tune their 'once every 5 years' antenna onto politics. There is a real risk for Labour of polling meltdown when it becomes clear to all and not just politics anoraks that Labour are led by a drooling moron and have an incoherent ruinous mess of a manifesto. Be in no doubt - Labour are in for a serious monstering in a year's time.
Patrick - Well, which one is it ! Have you changed your mind in 3 months ?
As for the Thurrock price shortening my guess is iSam has taken a chunk of 20-1 so Shadsy is probably rebalancing his book there.
A national poll has fewer than 5 samples per constituency . Clearly a large sample of marginals with 500 or so in each marginal will have a lower MofE than the national poll .
Don't wish to be rude but I would rather defer to the views of a noted psephologist and (former) pollster on these matters than your good self.
I think you are making up a general rule which my friend Robert did not make . If you go back to May 2009 , the national polls showing Conservatives with a 20% lead over Labour were a no more accurate forecast of the 2010 GE .
@MarkSenior - This is a note from Robert to me on the subject which I have posted here before:
"The problem with marginals polls (of which I've taken a few) is not with the sample size. That's often a red herring, as it doesn't matter how many people you talk to if they're not typical of all voters.
Therefore it's the 'sampling frame'. Assuming the poll is not random, and it won't be, the designers have to establish targets to set quotas to match with respondents. This is harder if it is not a standard national sample, as they have to find what is typical across 38 marginals, not the well known national figures that are regularly used.
As a result, I would agree that marginals are harder to get accurate polling in. (Of course, the sample size in individual marginals will also be very small, so it's useless for single seats within the group).
Overall, if the results of the poll across marginals suggests a different swing from that suggested by the whole weight of national polls, it's probable that it's the marginals poll that is wrong.
So I think you are probably right - though polling has certainly become more sophisticated since I last took one in 1992, so the Ashcroft people may have made a better fist of the sampling than we did in the old days!
By all means use me as an authority, though myself don't think I have much standing as one on polling nowadays ..."
I do not disagree with Robert's comments . It was yourself that brought 2010 into the picture and stated , that the national polls were more accurate in forecasting that result than marginals polls . . I have simply shown that back in May 2009 ( one year away from the next GE as now ) the national polls were nowhere near an accurate forecast of what would happen a year later . .
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
I may be making a rash assumption, but I'm guessing the general mood on the last question was in favour of such a referendum?
I used to think Labour were favourites in Ealing Central & Acton, but over on UKPR a lot of people who seem to know what they're talking about have said they think Tory support will be unusually solid, and that also the LD vote is more likely to split relatively evenly between Con and Lab in contrast to most other areas in London where the vast majority is likely to go to Lab.
Former Blue Peter presenter Konnie Huq's sister Rupa is standing for Labour.
The marginals would seem to hinder the Conservatives. However, it's worth noting that UKIP are riding high, and that tide may well recede come the General Election.
The function of UKIP is to provide a hostel for voters on their way from deserting Labour to attaching themselves to the Tories. After all, if enough Peebies say it, it must become true...
I agree @Innocent_Abroad, too much nonsense written about UKIPs demise or shrinkage after May 22nd elections. These are the hopes of the Lab/Lib/Con tribe. They are desperate that these hopes come true. If not, their whole world will collapse: may it be so.
Surely the error is to assume that Euro success will translate into Westminster success?
Aren't the polls quite clear that voters view the two very differently?
The polls at the moment show UKIP on an average of 14%/16% for the GE and around30±% for the EU. If UKIP does well on May 22nd, look to the council seats won or lost on the same day. These results, rather than the EU ones, will show, in my estimation, whether UKIP is on track for GE success.
In the end two HOPES are batting against each other.
If Helmer is selected in Newark it would mean the UKIP candidate would be about 2.5 times older than the Tory. In an older-than-average constituency like Newark that could prove to be an important factor.
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
I may be making a rash assumption, but I'm guessing the general mood on the last question was in favour of such a referendum?
I did think that last sentence was rather amusing. I am not sure whether it reflects how poor the local UKIP party organisation is or how poor the Newark advertiser reporting is. I am not overly impressed by either.
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
Given Farage's comments on Sunday about fighting back over claims UKIP were a racist party, I think its odds on that Bashir or Vaid get the nod
Good to see UKIP indulging in tokenistic nonsense. Soon you will be emulating PR man Cameron with his 'A-list'....
Interesting that the Tories have put up a full slate of candidates in Newham, but failed to do so in Islington.
In 4 of the 8 wards comprising the Islington North constituency they've failed to put up any candidates. (Each ward elects 3 members). The wards in question are Finsbury Park, Hillrise, St George's, Tollington. They've also failed to put any up in Holloway which is in Islington South.
Btw - If another_richard pops on, can you alert him to this post, he was interested on my Mum's weekend visit back to Page Hall Road.
So we went back, my mother was back to saying how disgusting the Roma are, begging and being an annoyance and doing bad things in the street.
When we got back into the car, I said, she was being far too harsh on the Roma, and they were a persecuted race, that Hitler had tried to wipe them out.
Her response "I can understand why"*
*Not her exact words, this conversation was in Urdu.
A national poll has fewer than 5 samples per constituency . Clearly a large sample of marginals with 500 or so in each marginal will have a lower MofE than the national poll .
Don't wish to be rude but I would rather defer to the views of a noted psephologist and (former) pollster on these matters than your good self.
I think you are making up a general rule which my friend Robert did not make . If you go back to May 2009 , the national polls showing Conservatives with a 20% lead over Labour were a no more accurate forecast of the 2010 GE .
@MarkSenior - This is a note from Robert to me on the subject which I have posted here before:
"The problem with marginals polls (of which I've taken a few) is not with the sample size. That's often a red herring, as it doesn't matter how many people you talk to if they're not typical of all voters.
Therefore it's the 'sampling frame'. Assuming the poll is not random, and it won't be, the designers have to establish targets to set quotas to match with respondents. This is harder if it is not a standard national sample, as they have to find what is typical across 38 marginals, not the well known national figures that are regularly used.
I do not disagree with Robert's comments . It was yourself that brought 2010 into the picture and stated , that the national polls were more accurate in forecasting that result than marginals polls . . I have simply shown that back in May 2009 ( one year away from the next GE as now ) the national polls were nowhere near an accurate forecast of what would happen a year later . .
My comments regarding 2010 was comparing the various polls of marginals in the campaign with the national polls: the latter proved to be more accurate.
If you're arguing that ANY polling, marginal or national, with a year still to run before the election has very limited value then I would entirely agree with you.
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
Given Farage's comments on Sunday about fighting back over claims UKIP were a racist party, I think its odds on that Bashir or Vaid get the nod
Good to see UKIP indulging in tokenistic nonsense. Soon you will be emulating PR man Cameron with his 'A-list'....
Yeah I see what you are saying.. kind of thought it myself, but if the media and other parties constantly call us racist maybe its not a bad idea to stamp on the fire.
Bashir was a candidate anyway, and is on tv/PEBs quite a lot, so its not as though he has been plucked from obscurity (relatively speaking)
I though Vaid was Farages PA, but she is darned pretty, so we'll let her off!
You could say that the ban on ex BNP members was not exactly libertarian, but when nasty insults are thrown maybe you have to be seen to do something that refutes them
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
I may be making a rash assumption, but I'm guessing the general mood on the last question was in favour of such a referendum?
Actually looking around the Newark Advertiser site a bit more it is clear this is a case of poor reporting. The hustings was not just UKIP but representatives of a number of parties standing in the Euro elections. It was not a meeting arranged by UKIP.
Interesting that the Tories have put up a full slate of candidates in Newham, but failed to do so in Islington.
In 4 of the 8 wards comprising the Islington North constituency they've failed to put up any candidates. (Each ward elects 3 members). The wards in question are Finsbury Park, Hillrise, St George's, Tollington. They've also failed to put any up in Holloway which is in Islington South.
Not really worth it in Islington. So blood is the seat that people who own £3m houses outright still vote Labour and read the Guardian.
The trick in Ealing Central is to squeeze the Liberal vote until the pips squeak - they have a good shout. Many viscerally anti-Tory Red Liberals in that seat - lots of leftie professionals who fell for the Liberal Winning Here con last time only to see Labour run the Tories closer and the Tory come through the middle. It's a genuine three-way marginal - a rare fish indeed.
How many in Ealing are now going to be worried about having to pay the Mansion Tax sometime though? It may be a modest number - but the majority in 2015 may well be a modest number....
How many of those who are at risk of paying the Mansion Tax are within the Tory Core Vote anyway? I would think rather a lot- therefore they won't be the voters in play.
Incidentally does anyone know what the current proposed threshold of the Mansion Tax is likely to be? I have read £2m as a suggestion but your comments about Ealing Central seems to suggest £1m (there really aren't very many houses in that are or conceivably will be worth £2m plus, even in the current market conditions). Of course if the tax is to actually raise any significant revenue, rather than just be a device to punish the very rich, the threshold needs to be £1m or perhaps even less.
After my shameful LD voting episode in 2010, I would love it if we win Ealing Central & Acton next year. Surely we can hoover up enough of the yellow vote to overhaul the Tories.
@ JohnO I suggest you read the ukpollingreport comments on the PoliticsHome marginal poll in October 2009 . It forecast a Conservative overall majority of around 70 not very accurate but rather less than the national polls of the time and a better Lib Dem performance in 2010 than the national polls were forecasting at the time . Neither the national nor the marginals polls were particularly accurate at forecasting the GE result 6 months out but the marginals poll was rather less inaccurate .
This is from the Newark Advertiser website from Sunday. Apparently the meeting to choose the UKIP candidates who will be interviewed for selection was being held last night.
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election. Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
I may be making a rash assumption, but I'm guessing the general mood on the last question was in favour of such a referendum?
I did think that last sentence was rather amusing. I am not sure whether it reflects how poor the local UKIP party organisation is or how poor the Newark advertiser reporting is. I am not overly impressed by either.
It's quite possible that the UKIP organisation in Newark will not be first rate; indeed it may only be less than a year since it became a definite branch in it's own right. This is an organisational weakness that UKIP must attend to before the 2015 GE.
The massive growth of UKIP has caught that organisation on the hop as well as all the political elite.
Comments
I'll stick with Dr. Robert Waller's general rule: that if national polling conflicts with that for marginals, it's the former that is more likely to be accurate. Wasn't that also the case in 2010?
http://newstonoone.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/the-saxon-shore-east-and-south-east.html
Con 4/7 (Hills, Lad, PP)
Lab 11/4 (Betfair, Lad, PP)
UKIP 9/2 (Bet365, Lad)
LD 250/1 (Bet365)
Croydon Council
LAB Control 1/3
CON Control 3/1
NOC 12/1
Hammersmith & Fulham Council
CON Control 1/2
LAB Control 2/1
NOC 10/1
Stockport Council
NOC 1/6
LAB Control 6/1
LD Control 10/1
Other council priced up are:
Barnet
Merton
Redbridge
Trafford
Over time, there is one feature of the Wisdom trend that is irrefutable – Labour’s predicted share has pretty consistently declined from a high of 39% in May 2012, to pretty much where it stands now (33%). The Conservatives have flat-lined in the 29-32% range, which they will hope to break out of now that positive economic noises are being heard from many quarters.
http://www.icmresearch.com/media-centre/polls/icm-sunday-telegraph-wisdom-index-january-2014
And of the most recent:
Martin Boon, head of ICM Research, said the result represented the joint narrowest lead for Labour ever recorded in the Wisdom Index.
“Both the main parties are polling much lower than they would hope for,” he said.
“This different polling approach provides further evidence that, at last, the Tories are making in-roads into the Labour vote.”
However, the shift is due to a loss of support for Labour as the Conservatives remain stuck on 31 per cent, he said.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10806655/Labour-lead-cut-to-one-point-as-Telegraph-opinion-poll-exposes-UKs-North-South-divide.html
One thing I noticed in the Telegraph reporting of this - the description 'Ed Miliband's Labour' - we know 'David Cameron's Conservatives' helps the Conservatives, I wonder if the reverse is true for Labour?
The marginals would seem to hinder the Conservatives. However, it's worth noting that UKIP are riding high, and that tide may well recede come the General Election.
So....my best guess is a Tory lead of not enough for a majority. Hung parliament and the current coalition continues.
IIRC the tories outperformed the Universal swing at the last election, presumably doing better in the marginals to do so. I suspect this shows 2 things. First, the tories are more vulnerable where they outperformed and second that these marginals are more volatile than the average.
The result of neither of these terribly surprising conclusions is that where there is a swing against the tories in the national polls they seem to be doing worse in these seats. What that actually tells us about the possible outcome of a GE I would be a lot less sure about. These seats will probably give us a slightly exaggerated result again whichever way the election goes. I do not accept that as a generality the tories have particular problems in these seats.
http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/motorsport/story/156493.html
Worth also noting that the circuit will be hard on tyres, which may hamper Ferrari and Williams (those teams had to make an extra stop in Bahrain compared to the drivers ahead of them).
Hastings & Rye: both PP and Shadsy have UKIP at 100/1
We cannot keep operating on the same basis as before, making predictions based on a country that might be about to split into two staying as one, and ignoring the rise of UKIP.
It'd be like ignoring pre-season testing and backing Vettel for the title (incidentally, there's an off-chance he will win it but I would be significantly surprised).
I'm sure if we pool our resources we can stop TSE feeling liverish....
On the Sunday Herald endorsement, Prof Tomkins tweeted the respective circulations of the Sunday Herald and Sunday Post, adding the tag "#gamechanger" - I suspect he was being sarcastic....
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At91c3wX1Wu5dDRiT1FSRTF2bjVYRThSTnRaNzFXMlE#gid=0
IMO seats that Labour might find more difficult than expected to win are as follows:
Thurrock, Waveney, Brighton Pavilion, Ipswich, Halesowen, Gloucester, Kingswood, Croydon Central, Worcester, Warwick&Leamington, B'ham Yardley, Ealing Central & Acton, Stevenage.
If they fail to win a majority next year it'll probably be because they've missed a fair number of those targets.
The Tories have to "win" 326 seats by one vote; not just finish above Labour. It's no good finishing above Labour if they finish below UKIP.
I'll get my coat ...
Aren't the polls quite clear that voters view the two very differently?
Edit - they could bleed 5 to Labour and gain 25 from the Lib Dems for example
It is a racing certainty that a Tory Majority will correlate to a > 6+% lead in the polls though. So the second sentence is misleading at best.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At91c3wX1Wu5dGViNUppLVFxalJKN21kQXlfNWo0d1E&usp=sheets_web#gid=0
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At91c3wX1Wu5dGRabkF6R2dtNkxqZnRHUHk0cE5fM0E&usp=sheets_web#gid=0
The trick in Ealing Central is to squeeze the Liberal vote until the pips squeak - they have a good shout. Many viscerally anti-Tory Red Liberals in that seat - lots of leftie professionals who fell for the Liberal Winning Here con last time only to see Labour run the Tories closer and the Tory come through the middle. It's a genuine three-way marginal - a rare fish indeed.
I accept your point, but it's still quite cool that York's last king was called Erik/Eric Bloodaxe.
"The problem with marginals polls (of which I've taken a few) is not with the sample size. That's often a red herring, as it doesn't matter how many people you talk to if they're not typical of all voters.
Therefore it's the 'sampling frame'. Assuming the poll is not random, and it won't be, the designers have to establish targets to set quotas to match with respondents.
This is harder if it is not a standard national sample, as they have to find what is typical across 38 marginals, not the well known national figures that are regularly used.
As a result, I would agree that marginals are harder to get accurate polling in.
(Of course, the sample size in individual marginals will also be very small, so it's useless for single seats within the group).
Overall, if the results of the poll across marginals suggests a different swing from that suggested by the whole weight of national polls, it's probable that it's the marginals poll that is wrong.
So I think you are probably right - though polling has certainly become more sophisticated since I last took one in 1992, so the Ashcroft people may have made a better fist of the sampling than we did in the old days!
By all means use me as an authority, though myself don't think I have much standing as one on polling nowadays ..."
After completing my look at the east and south east tomorrow, I'll turn to the west midlands next.
Ladbrokes have been 7/1 Thurrock for quite some time
Farage wont stand there, Tim Aker is the UKIP candidate. He is a local lad and also Head of Policy. He is on the Daily Politics quite often now
FWIW I make S Bas & E Thurrock as bet at 20/1
Check out the Michael Wood documentary on YouTube. It's very entertaining.
The expectation is that the private sector will create approximately 500K additional jobs this year. Really remarkable. If some of this bleeds into the seaside towns antifrank describes so well it may well make a difference.
The government will have an excellent story to tell on the economy at the next election. That might not matter if the Eds can persuade enough people that they are not sharing in the growth but I think the pressure will be on for Labour to have a persuasive story to tell and I have not heard it so far.
We have been through the longest fall in real wages on record. Given that and the strength of UKIP it is surprising that the tories are doing as well as they are. The challenge of putting together an election winning coalition remains daunting however.
"“The April numbers point to the economy growing by at least 0.8% again in the second quarter and, with confidence about the future rising again in April, there’s no end in sight for the current super-strong growth spell.
“The survey also brings news that private sector employment rose at a record pace in April, signalling 100,000 jobs being created each month."
http://www.markiteconomics.com/Survey/PressRelease.mvc/b73ab147eb084d98bc3b90513addad13
I slept like a baby last night.
I woke up every half an hour crying.
I work in Manchester in an office full of either United or City fans.
The City fans are convinced they'll either lose up Villa or West Ham "because we're City, that's what we do"
To offer a professional view on marginal polls vs national polls: it's a common fallacy to think that having a big poll is more important than having a balanced poll. If you poll 200,000 pensioners you'll get a less accurate picture of the national scene than if you poll a 2,000 weighted sample. The reason marginal polls have historically been misleading is that they've usually not weighted for the local population. For instance, Broxtowe has a smallish immigrant population (6%), so a poll there should have 6% or so immigrants, if this is thought important for voting intention, and if it accidentally has 1% or 12% it'll change the figures. That's also why studying subsamples in national polls doesn't work.
That said, my understanding is that the Ashcroft polls do try to weight for constituency populations, don't they? If so, then they're genuinely just as important as Mike says. The factor that we're appearing to see is the absence of first-term incumbency bonus for most Conservative MPs, perhaps because of the general feeling of disillusion with politicians. I was surprised to see them actually doing worse than the national polls, though, and it'll be odd if that's repeated.
Patrick - Well, which one is it ! Have you changed your mind in 3 months ?
As for the Thurrock price shortening my guess is iSam has taken a chunk of 20-1 so Shadsy is probably rebalancing his book there.
http://newstonoone.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/the-saxon-shore-east-and-south-east.html
"The Newark branch of UKIP meets tomorrow night to decide who they want to fight the Newark by-election.
Nominations for candidates close at midnight today. The national executive committee will then select who will go forward to appear before the Newark members.
There have been reports that East Midlands Euro MP Mr Roger Helmer, who defected from the Tories in 2012, was being lined up to fight the by-election.
Newark branch chairman Mr Peter Weston-Davies said today he was yet to be told who was on the list but said he would not be surprised to see Mr Helmer's name.
Mr Helmer was among four prospective MEPs who took part in a hustings at the Magnus School, Newark, last night. Issues raised included immigration, jobs, and if there should be a referendum over whether Britain should stay in or opt out of the European Union."
Former Blue Peter presenter Konnie Huq's sister Rupa is standing for Labour.
In the end two HOPES are batting against each other.
Raheem Kassam @RaheemJKassam May 4
@WikiGuido @AlexandralSwann Helmer is UKIP HQ’s candidate of choice. Grassroots prefer Bashir. Some want Lizzy Vaid to run.
Given Farage's comments on Sunday about fighting back over claims UKIP were a racist party, I think its odds on that Bashir or Vaid get the nod
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/01/ukip-should-choose-amjad-bashir
Good to see UKIP indulging in tokenistic nonsense. Soon you will be emulating PR man Cameron with his 'A-list'....
In 4 of the 8 wards comprising the Islington North constituency they've failed to put up any candidates. (Each ward elects 3 members). The wards in question are Finsbury Park, Hillrise, St George's, Tollington. They've also failed to put any up in Holloway which is in Islington South.
So we went back, my mother was back to saying how disgusting the Roma are, begging and being an annoyance and doing bad things in the street.
When we got back into the car, I said, she was being far too harsh on the Roma, and they were a persecuted race, that Hitler had tried to wipe them out.
Her response "I can understand why"*
*Not her exact words, this conversation was in Urdu.
If you're arguing that ANY polling, marginal or national, with a year still to run before the election has very limited value then I would entirely agree with you.
Incidentally, do we know when Catalan will be voting? If it gets that far...
On that note, I just checked Google News for word on Venice, but it doesn't seem to have (independence-wise) made the headlines since April.
Bashir was a candidate anyway, and is on tv/PEBs quite a lot, so its not as though he has been plucked from obscurity (relatively speaking)
I though Vaid was Farages PA, but she is darned pretty, so we'll let her off!
You could say that the ban on ex BNP members was not exactly libertarian, but when nasty insults are thrown maybe you have to be seen to do something that refutes them
Incidentally does anyone know what the current proposed threshold of the Mansion Tax is likely to be? I have read £2m as a suggestion but your comments about Ealing Central seems to suggest £1m (there really aren't very many houses in that are or conceivably will be worth £2m plus, even in the current market conditions). Of course if the tax is to actually raise any significant revenue, rather than just be a device to punish the very rich, the threshold needs to be £1m or perhaps even less.
I suggest you read the ukpollingreport comments on the PoliticsHome marginal poll in October 2009 . It forecast a Conservative overall majority of around 70 not very accurate but rather less than the national polls of the time and a better Lib Dem performance in 2010 than the national polls were forecasting at the time .
Neither the national nor the marginals polls were particularly accurate at forecasting the GE result 6 months out but the marginals poll was rather less inaccurate .
The massive growth of UKIP has caught that organisation on the hop as well as all the political elite.