Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
"Remember, the model is based on the party’s opinion poll support moving as expected before the next General Election. If the support doesn’t move as expected over the next few months then the model will self-correct and respond to the new situation."
In other words, if the opinion polls don't move how I predicted....err, I will follow them.
Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
He probably is there, OGH's PP screenshot only takes in so many of the runners. Couldn't resist a dig though.
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Clearly it's all a bit subtle for you:)
Perhaps. All I know is that you don't understand what the word riposte means, so you made yourself look a bit silly using it when commenting on another poster's poor grammar. But it's a minor point.
"Remember, the model is based on the party’s opinion poll support moving as expected before the next General Election. If the support doesn’t move as expected over the next few months then the model will self-correct and respond to the new situation."
In other words, if the opinion polls don't move how I predicted....err, I will follow them.
Caveatalicious!
I'm not sure updating a model as new information becomes available is that unusual or controversial.
Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
He probably is there, OGH's PP screenshot only takes in so many of the runners. Couldn't resist a dig though.
Since Carmichael became the new Viceroy of Scotland every poll has shown No ahead.
"Remember, the model is based on the party’s opinion poll support moving as expected before the next General Election. If the support doesn’t move as expected over the next few months then the model will self-correct and respond to the new situation."
In other words, if the opinion polls don't move how I predicted....err, I will follow them.
Caveatalicious!
I'm not sure updating a model as new information becomes available is that unusual or controversial.
It's called goalpost moving, not unusual or controversial, especially on this messageboard.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
In theory you're right, but in practice I expect it's the sort of point that would only be made by the sort of people who would never have voted for the Lib Dems in the first place.
Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
He probably is there, OGH's PP screenshot only takes in so many of the runners. Couldn't resist a dig though.
Since Carmichael became the new Viceroy of Scotland every poll has shown No ahead.
A great example of the old causation/correlation saw, unless you think Al's responsible for the shrinkage of that lead.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
Cable's left it too late. After the Campbell leadership they won't make the mistake of going for a candidate of an older vintage and also his performance in office has left a lot to be desired. A perfect example of 'Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.' The Libdems will undoubtedly go leftwards when Clegg falls on his sword. Farron is the clear favourite and rightly so.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Clearly it's all a bit subtle for you:)
Perhaps. All I know is that you don't understand what the word riposte means, so you made yourself look a bit silly using it when commenting on another poster's poor grammar. But it's a minor point.
According to the latest POPULUS you're the one who looks silly:)
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
Options BobaFett Posts: 990 2:32PM @MikeSmithson - great documentary/focus group on the Red Liberals on C4 News Catch Up site. Very much backs up your arguments.
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
Nato need to get it in gear quickly. The more Putin is emboldened the more he'll push it. Yes, it'll be expensive, yes it'll require a hasty rethink on defence priorities in the west but Cold War II is up and running.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Clearly it's all a bit subtle for you:)
Perhaps. All I know is that you don't understand what the word riposte means, so you made yourself look a bit silly using it when commenting on another poster's poor grammar. But it's a minor point.
According to the latest POPULUS you're the one who looks silly:)
"Remember, the model is based on the party’s opinion poll support moving as expected before the next General Election. If the support doesn’t move as expected over the next few months then the model will self-correct and respond to the new situation."
In other words, if the opinion polls don't move how I predicted....err, I will follow them.
Caveatalicious!
I'm not sure updating a model as new information becomes available is that unusual or controversial.
It's called goalpost moving, not unusual or controversial, especially on this messageboard.
Basil wants us to make a prediction today about the result of the 2020 general election and stick to it.
Personally, I think that a triumphant George Osborne will sweep through the gates of Downing Street, basking in the cheers of a grateful nation, eager for his second term (having taken over from David Cameron in 2017).
*takes off Avery's hat and re-enters Earth gravitational field*
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
Nato need to get it in gear quickly. The more Putin is emboldened the more he'll push it. Yes, it'll be expensive, yes it'll require a hasty rethink on defence priorities in the west but Cold War II is up and running.
There's no taste for it in the Wests leadership. Putin has already own stage one of the New Cold War.
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
Whatever happens in September it is likely to become much more difficult for MPs representing Scottish seats to lead UK-wide parties. Either because (1) the UK will no longer include Scotland or (2) there will be a level of Devomax for Scotland which will specifically preclude Scottish MPs voting on a number of issues.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
She's wrong there. Completely. Devomax won't stop Scots being MPs outside Scotland. They could easily lead national parties. In the same way, it would be very tricky for someone English elected as an MP for a Scottish seat to become a leader. Also, I'd say that the foreign secretary job - a great office of state - might well be held by an MP representing a Scottish seat. PM and Chancellor would be a lot trickier. Defence could be done too.
"Remember, the model is based on the party’s opinion poll support moving as expected before the next General Election. If the support doesn’t move as expected over the next few months then the model will self-correct and respond to the new situation."
In other words, if the opinion polls don't move how I predicted....err, I will follow them.
Caveatalicious!
I'm not sure updating a model as new information becomes available is that unusual or controversial.
It's called goalpost moving, not unusual or controversial, especially on this messageboard.
Basil wants us to make a prediction today about the result of the 2020 general election and stick to it.
Personally, I think that a triumphant George Osborne will sweep through the gates of Downing Street, basking in the cheers of a grateful nation, eager for his second term (having taken over from David Cameron in 2017).
*takes off Avery's hat and re-enters Earth gravitational field*
On topic - the Liberals would have to have a death wish to install a rightwinger.
I'll let other PBers do the punch line.
Do you think a role as the #2 anti-Tory party is more appealing that a unique (albeit minority) niche as a internationally minded, freedom loving party?
Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
He probably is there, OGH's PP screenshot only takes in so many of the runners. Couldn't resist a dig though.
Since Carmichael became the new Viceroy of Scotland every poll has shown No ahead.
A great example of the old causation/correlation saw, unless you think Al's responsible for the shrinkage of that lead.
Someone last week pointed out the month before Carmichael was appointed Secretary of State, Yes were ahead by 1% and now they are 5% behind.
Alistair Carmichael - Killing Scottish Nationalism stone dead.
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
Nuke Moscow, simples.
Now that is weird, I was just thinking about Kenny Everett and his Tory Conference shanangans, and you posted that.
Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
He probably is there, OGH's PP screenshot only takes in so many of the runners. Couldn't resist a dig though.
Since Carmichael became the new Viceroy of Scotland every poll has shown No ahead.
A great example of the old causation/correlation saw, unless you think Al's responsible for the shrinkage of that lead.
Someone last week pointed out the month before Carmichael was appointed Secretary of State, Yes were ahead by 1% and now they are 5% behind.
Alistair Carmichael - Killing Scottish Nationalism stone dead.
Ah, so the infamous SNP Panelbase was in fact accurate? Hooray.
Does PaddyPower know something we don't? Colossus Carmichael is missing.
Did Mr C not make it known he'd be leaving politics at the next election anyway? (Just after feeding time with Ms Sturgeon.) That would certainly explain it.
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
He probably is there, OGH's PP screenshot only takes in so many of the runners. Couldn't resist a dig though.
Since Carmichael became the new Viceroy of Scotland every poll has shown No ahead.
A great example of the old causation/correlation saw, unless you think Al's responsible for the shrinkage of that lead.
Someone last week pointed out the month before Carmichael was appointed Secretary of State, Yes were ahead by 1% and now they are 5% behind.
Alistair Carmichael - Killing Scottish Nationalism stone dead.
Ah, so the infamous SNP Panelbase was in fact accurate? Hooray.
It was a poll that most considered an outlier.
I've been impressed by Panelbase a lot, both then and in recent weeks.
You're actually taking something Polly Toynbee says seriously??? How cute.
I don't think I indicated how I took it. In fact I'm pretty sure I now know more about how you 'take' Polly than the reverse.
Leaving to one side this emetic talk of how to 'take Polly' (presumably with the aid of a paper bag), is there currently a self-identifying Englishman/woman who is an MP in Scotland? If not, do you (or anyone else) know who was the last? Genuinely curious.
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
I've just had a look my next Lib Dem leader portfolio
Cable 16/1 Farron 5/1 Steve Webb 20/1 Julia Goldsworthy 20/1 (from 2009!) Chris Huhne 14/1 Danny Alexander 25/1 (Peter from Putney persuaded me that was a good value bet)
In hindsight, I think Chris Huhne has a better shot as next Lib Dem leader than Danny Alexander
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
You're actually taking something Polly Toynbee says seriously??? How cute.
I don't think I indicated how I took it. In fact I'm pretty sure I now know more about how you 'take' Polly than the reverse.
Leaving to one side this emetic talk of how to 'take Polly' (presumably with the aid of a paper bag), is there currently a self-identifying Englishman/woman who is an MP in Scotland? If not, do you (or anyone else) know who was the last? Genuinely curious.
Not sure how Tom Greatrex self identifies (British probably?), but he was born & brought up in England.
On topic.Tim Farron is 2-1 with some of my money behind him,despite making himself look silly over the bedroom tax.He could work well with Labour and possibly curb some of its' more authoritian, crypto-Stalinist tendencies.It seems that parts of the Labour party are waking up to the political threat of fracking.The Labour MPs who read this blog ought to have a look at the map and see just how constituencies are to be affected.Other areas such as a "Support,Don't Punish" approach to drug policy favour a small wager on the good doctor,Julian Huppert.The 50-1 quoted prices in the fact that he may lose Cambridge.He is a big fan of evidence-based policy too,as a good Doctor should be. The Electoral Reform Society's rearch on STV replacing FPTP in local government points to benefits to all parties,large and small.This could be the bedrock of a Lab-Lib pact. The Lib Dems need to lose their notions of replacing the NHS with an insurance-based system.Another good Doctor,Lord Owen,is no fool.He knows what they are up to and is backing Labour to show the fundamental principles of the NHS funded by general taxation,and free at the point of use are maintained.The neo-liberals can leave their fantasy island aside when people are sick and disabled. Sometimes just saying "Sorry" ain't enuff-ask Maria.
You're actually taking something Polly Toynbee says seriously??? How cute.
I don't think I indicated how I took it. In fact I'm pretty sure I now know more about how you 'take' Polly than the reverse.
Leaving to one side this emetic talk of how to 'take Polly' (presumably with the aid of a paper bag), is there currently a self-identifying Englishman/woman who is an MP in Scotland? If not, do you (or anyone else) know who was the last? Genuinely curious.
Not sure how Tom Greatrex self identifies (British probably?), but he was born & brought up in England.
Cheers. That's what you call a safe seat! They could exhume Jimmy Savile and he'd win there as a Labour candidate.
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
She's wrong there. Completely. Devomax won't stop Scots being MPs outside Scotland. They could easily lead national parties. In the same way, it would be very tricky for someone English elected as an MP for a Scottish seat to become a leader. Also, I'd say that the foreign secretary job - a great office of state - might well be held by an MP representing a Scottish seat. PM and Chancellor would be a lot trickier. Defence could be done too.
More to the point,sending Moyes and Lambert back to Scotland would increase the Man Utd and Villa fanbase to vote "yes".
I've just had a look my next Lib Dem leader portfolio
Cable 16/1 Farron 5/1 Steve Webb 20/1 Julia Goldsworthy 20/1 (from 2009!) Chris Huhne 14/1 Danny Alexander 25/1 (Peter from Putney persuaded me that was a good value bet)
In hindsight, I think Chris Huhne has a better shot as next Lib Dem leader than Danny Alexander
There's ingratitude for you and after all the cracking good bets I've posted on here too. As regards Danny Boy's prospects, I'd forgotten that being the most effective LibDem in the Government over the past four years counted for absolutely SFA.
Is there a Tory constituency association that would want a leftish-leaning Europhile as its MP?
Rushcliffe or Sheffield Hallam
Broxtowe has had Europhile MPs for the last 40 years regardless of party - not sure we've ever differed on the issue. We also agree on gay marriage (pro), overseas aid (pro) and opposition to overturning the hunting ban, though I'm not sure that quite adds up to leftism (and I'm not sure if Browne is sound on hunting).
The only one of that lot that looks tempting to me is Steven Webb at 20-1. I have not seen that much of Tim Farron but what I have seen has been deeply unimpressive and well short of leadership level.
If Charlie was proveably and demonstrably sober he could be a candidate again. There is still quite a well of goodwill towards him and I for one admired his stand over Iraq greatly. That was a brave, principled and correct decision and there is no one of substance in either of the major parties who can claim to have done the same.
I do not believe it has become impossible for a Scot to become the leader of a UK party (assuming the vote is no of course) but it has become more difficult. As devo max develops and the obvious West Lothian answer is applied the number of available jobs which will allow promotion will be greatly diminished.
It would be possible, for example, for a Scot to be Education Secretary (for a Scottish constituency, obviously the current incumbent is Scottish) but why would you want all the hassle and inability to vote for your own legislation? There would have to be a pretty compelling reason to make such an appointment. Without such a range of experience any candidate for the top job is going to be hobbled.
I've just had a look my next Lib Dem leader portfolio
Cable 16/1 Farron 5/1 Steve Webb 20/1 Julia Goldsworthy 20/1 (from 2009!) Chris Huhne 14/1 Danny Alexander 25/1 (Peter from Putney persuaded me that was a good value bet)
In hindsight, I think Chris Huhne has a better shot as next Lib Dem leader than Danny Alexander
There's ingratitude for you and after all the cracking good bets I've posted on here too. As regards Danny Boy's prospects, I'd forgotten that being the most effective LibDem in the Government over the past four years counted for absolutely SFA.
I'm always grateful for your tips.
I think he's going to lose his seat next year, and that's going to bugger up his chances of Leadership.
You claimed people in Scotland vote in an anti Catholic way - you are utterly wrong.
No I didn't, you inferred that in the standard, paranoid way of your sort. My facetious comment may have just as much implied that people voted for someone because they were Catholic.
Wee, blue-nosed mooses, indulging in enraged victimhood since...well, time immemorial really.
TSE - your betting on the next LibDem leader shows certain St.johnian tendencies, aka covering the field. If I sold you a pup by suggesting Danny Alexander, I could certainly have saved you a few bob by dissuading you from investing in Vince Cable. Read my lips ..... FAR TOO OLD.
I've just had a look my next Lib Dem leader portfolio
Cable 16/1 Farron 5/1 Steve Webb 20/1 Julia Goldsworthy 20/1 (from 2009!) Chris Huhne 14/1 Danny Alexander 25/1 (Peter from Putney persuaded me that was a good value bet)
In hindsight, I think Chris Huhne has a better shot as next Lib Dem leader than Danny Alexander
There's ingratitude for you and after all the cracking good bets I've posted on here too. As regards Danny Boy's prospects, I'd forgotten that being the most effective LibDem in the Government over the past four years counted for absolutely SFA.
I'm always grateful for your tips.
I think he's going to lose his seat next year, and that's going to bugger up his chances of Leadership.
But OGH is still keen (although God knows why!) on Chris Huhne, despite him having lost his seat
The next LibDem leader can only be of the tiny tiny minority that didn't get bitten by the vampire and vote more loyally for Tory bills than Tory MPs did. Any current member of the government is an absolute non-starter, so that does put Farron in the clear lead. Sadly for the LibDems....
I've just had a look my next Lib Dem leader portfolio
Cable 16/1 Farron 5/1 Steve Webb 20/1 Julia Goldsworthy 20/1 (from 2009!) Chris Huhne 14/1 Danny Alexander 25/1 (Peter from Putney persuaded me that was a good value bet)
In hindsight, I think Chris Huhne has a better shot as next Lib Dem leader than Danny Alexander
There's ingratitude for you and after all the cracking good bets I've posted on here too. As regards Danny Boy's prospects, I'd forgotten that being the most effective LibDem in the Government over the past four years counted for absolutely SFA.
I'm always grateful for your tips.
I think he's going to lose his seat next year, and that's going to bugger up his chances of Leadership.
There is a greater risk of a yes vote ending Danny's Westminster career than there is of him losing his seat. Both are odds against but they are not related contingencies and taken together there must be a significant risk.
Personally I think he would make an excellent leader and agree with Peter that he has been the most impressive Lib Dem in the government by a distance.
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Clearly it's all a bit subtle for you:)
Perhaps. All I know is that you don't understand what the word riposte means, so you made yourself look a bit silly using it when commenting on another poster's poor grammar. But it's a minor point.
What am I missing here? Doesn't "riposte" mean "respond with a clever remark"?
TSE - your betting on the next LibDem leader shows certain St.johnian tendencies, aka covering the field. If I sold you a pup by suggesting Danny Alexander, I could certainly have saved you a few bob by dissuading you from investing in Vince Cable. Read my lips ..... FAR TOO OLD.
It was no pup.He was 25/1, he's now as low as 10/1.
Cable's age is no barrier, he's only four years older than Vince Cable.
The next LibDem leader can only be of the tiny tiny minority that didn't get bitten by the vampire and vote more loyally for Tory bills than Tory MPs did. Any current member of the government is an absolute non-starter, so that does put Farron in the clear lead. Sadly for the LibDems....
Apart from the fact that they are Coalition bills not "Tory bills".
Labour partisans can't seem to reconcile themselves to the fact that if LibDems can't be their willing fools then they must be Conservative willing fools.
Fools they may or may not be but they'll have earned the credit or approbrium for being part of a Coalition government. Further it will LibDem members who'll decide the next leader not "Rochdale Pioneers" and they will see things very differently to you.
Let us hope it is Farron. We can then watch him welcome Rennard back into his party as in Tim Farron Jan 2014 "We allowed it to fester and justice was not done,"" .... which is why he will be presiding over Rennard's return. Real car crash tv folks.
Maybe this time the Lib Dem feminists will actually rise up inside the party and deal with the Rennard problem? Withdrawl of their help to all male LDs? Never on a Sunday? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_on_Sunday
Great story (must admit that I thought Aretha was no longer with us). Wasn't aware of the removal of earrings thing, useful to know.
'Patti Labelle Arrested After Fist Fight with Aretha Franklin
..While at the concert in Atlanta, Labelle attempted to approach Franklin to resolve their outstanding issues, but Franklin once again turned up her nose. Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly. Bystanders subdued Labelle and escorted her outside of the venue. Franklin suffered only minor injuries.'
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Clearly it's all a bit subtle for you:)
Perhaps. All I know is that you don't understand what the word riposte means, so you made yourself look a bit silly using it when commenting on another poster's poor grammar. But it's a minor point.
What am I missing here? Doesn't "riposte" mean "respond with a clever remark"?
No. In the poshest parts of Surrey "riposte" means to repost and the former is pronounced with the final "e" being silent.
Who has rubbished Populus. I have just given the last six poll. One polling company has two polls that give a significantly lower Labour lead than the three companies that have done four polls giving exactly the same results.
People can make their own mind up where the real situation lies.
Lol - even funnier seeing the grammatical errors when you rush to riposte:)
If you are going to make clever comments about grammar, best to make sure you have riposted (!!!) accurately. You do know what riposte means, don't you?
Roflwmtita - as Corporal Jones put it - " they don't like it up em"
So you don't know what riposte means. Hint: you are probably best off not commenting on people's grammar on an internet message board.
Clearly it's all a bit subtle for you:)
Perhaps. All I know is that you don't understand what the word riposte means, so you made yourself look a bit silly using it when commenting on another poster's poor grammar. But it's a minor point.
What am I missing here? Doesn't "riposte" mean "respond with a clever remark"?
No. In the poshest parts of Surrey "riposte" means to repost and the former is pronounced with the final "e" being silent.
The stealthy Russian takeover of Eastern Ukraine is continuing:
AJELive @AJELive 7m Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
The only one of that lot that looks tempting to me is Steven Webb at 20-1. I have not seen that much of Tim Farron but what I have seen has been deeply unimpressive and well short of leadership level.
Farron's big USP is that his fingerprints aren't on the Coalition. If that is judged to have been an unhappy experience with an unfortunate electoral outcome, then nobody who was involved - Alexander, Cable, Webb, Lamb, Browne etc. - will be able to compete with Farron's not-me-guv stance. It's quite possible that this will be the key factor in the next leadership selection, though it won't hurt with members that he's vaguely left of centre too.
Steven Webb is your and my sort of choice - an impressive geek who is really interested in policy and doing stuff. His nearest counterpart is Oliver Letwin, and sadly they have roughly similar chances of becoming leaders.
Comments
Edit: he's there, isn;t he?!
Any time before the next election and I would have thought Vince Cable is the only candidate who makes sense, with Cabinet experience, offering a decidedly different strand of Liberal Democracy from Nick Clegg and with public recognition.
After the next election and it's a more open field. First you have to identify which ones will still be in Parliament. Danny Alexander needs to clear that fence first (and the Scottish independence referendum for that matter).
If the Lib Dems at that point are out of power, they are likely to want to offer a fresh direction, meaning that Tim Farron's chances look better. Are they as good as 2/1? I don't think so, because of his lack of Government experience and his mediocre image on gay rights. The candidate who would do really well for the Lib Dems is Steve Webb (he comes from the left of the party, has shown he can work effectively in Government and has been involved in some popular policies), but I doubt he wants the job.
He's 16/1 with Paddy Power.
From 40/1 when Mike first tipped him
"Remember, the model is based on the party’s opinion poll support moving as expected before the next General Election. If the support doesn’t move as expected over the next few months then the model will self-correct and respond to the new situation."
In other words, if the opinion polls don't move how I predicted....err, I will follow them.
Caveatalicious!
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
http://tinyurl.com/o59qxq2
AJELive @AJELive 7m
Video: Pro-Russia activist claims to have seized Slovyansk airport to prevent Ukrainian airforce planes from landing. http://aje.me/1eErsZi
BobaFett Posts: 990
2:32PM
@MikeSmithson - great documentary/focus group on the Red Liberals on C4 News Catch Up site. Very much backs up your arguments.
Www.channel4.com/news/catch-up/display/playlistref/100414
Click on film in bottom right
Flag Quote · Off Topic
I'll let other PBers do the punch line.
Personally, I think that a triumphant George Osborne will sweep through the gates of Downing Street, basking in the cheers of a grateful nation, eager for his second term (having taken over from David Cameron in 2017).
*takes off Avery's hat and re-enters Earth gravitational field*
You must be the only one who does 'see' then ;-)
Alistair Carmichael - Killing Scottish Nationalism stone dead.
That said, he really doesn't like Clegg and the current set up of the Lib Dems,
Could he persuaded to defect? Tories to take Taunton Deane at evens with Mr Shadsy.
"Taxidermist for Basil".
I've been impressed by Panelbase a lot, both then and in recent weeks.
Cable 16/1
Farron 5/1
Steve Webb 20/1
Julia Goldsworthy 20/1 (from 2009!)
Chris Huhne 14/1
Danny Alexander 25/1 (Peter from Putney persuaded me that was a good value bet)
In hindsight, I think Chris Huhne has a better shot as next Lib Dem leader than Danny Alexander
Cable or Farron.
To quote the Aussies when Martin McCague pledged his allegiance to England.
"It's an example of a rat joining a sinking ship"
The Electoral Reform Society's rearch on STV replacing FPTP in local government points to benefits to all parties,large and small.This could be the bedrock of a Lab-Lib pact.
The Lib Dems need to lose their notions of replacing the NHS with an insurance-based system.Another good Doctor,Lord Owen,is no fool.He knows what they are up to and is backing Labour to show the fundamental principles of the NHS funded by general taxation,and free at the point of use are maintained.The neo-liberals can leave their fantasy island aside when people are sick and disabled.
Sometimes just saying "Sorry" ain't enuff-ask Maria.
Go defections!
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/apr/03/labour-mocks-lib-dems-peers-vote-keep-bedroom-tax
Putting those words together demonstrates something odd about you. Incidentally, Julian Huppert is a real doctor. (PhD)
The man is a saint.
Says all you need to know about the stupidity of sectarianism.
Polly says it's unthinkable.
'That’s the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee on this afternoon’s Sunday Politics London during a discussion on Nick Clegg’s leadership of the Lib Dems, telling presenter Andrew Neil that even were Scotland to vote No in September’s independence referendum, it would be unthinkable for any Scot to ever again lead a UK political party, or hold any of the great offices of state.'
http://tinyurl.com/o59qxq2
She's wrong there. Completely. Devomax won't stop Scots being MPs outside Scotland. They could easily lead national parties. In the same way, it would be very tricky for someone English elected as an MP for a Scottish seat to become a leader. Also, I'd say that the foreign secretary job - a great office of state - might well be held by an MP representing a Scottish seat. PM and Chancellor would be a lot trickier. Defence could be done too.
More to the point,sending Moyes and Lambert back to Scotland would increase the Man Utd and Villa fanbase to vote "yes".
You are also a bit harsh on you fellow Scots who seem to have no problems voting for RC's despite them making up only 16% of the population.
As regards Danny Boy's prospects, I'd forgotten that being the most effective LibDem in the Government over the past four years counted for absolutely SFA.
Broxtowe has had Europhile MPs for the last 40 years regardless of party - not sure we've ever differed on the issue. We also agree on gay marriage (pro), overseas aid (pro) and opposition to overturning the hunting ban, though I'm not sure that quite adds up to leftism (and I'm not sure if Browne is sound on hunting).
If Charlie was proveably and demonstrably sober he could be a candidate again. There is still quite a well of goodwill towards him and I for one admired his stand over Iraq greatly. That was a brave, principled and correct decision and there is no one of substance in either of the major parties who can claim to have done the same.
I do not believe it has become impossible for a Scot to become the leader of a UK party (assuming the vote is no of course) but it has become more difficult. As devo max develops and the obvious West Lothian answer is applied the number of available jobs which will allow promotion will be greatly diminished.
It would be possible, for example, for a Scot to be Education Secretary (for a Scottish constituency, obviously the current incumbent is Scottish) but why would you want all the hassle and inability to vote for your own legislation? There would have to be a pretty compelling reason to make such an appointment. Without such a range of experience any candidate for the top job is going to be hobbled.
I think he's going to lose his seat next year, and that's going to bugger up his chances of Leadership.
Wee, blue-nosed mooses, indulging in enraged victimhood since...well, time immemorial really.
Personally I think he would make an excellent leader and agree with Peter that he has been the most impressive Lib Dem in the government by a distance.
Cable's age is no barrier, he's only four years older than Vince Cable.
Labour partisans can't seem to reconcile themselves to the fact that if LibDems can't be their willing fools then they must be Conservative willing fools.
Fools they may or may not be but they'll have earned the credit or approbrium for being part of a Coalition government. Further it will LibDem members who'll decide the next leader not "Rochdale Pioneers" and they will see things very differently to you.
Maybe this time the Lib Dem feminists will actually rise up inside the party and deal with the Rennard problem? Withdrawl of their help to all male LDs? Never on a Sunday? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_on_Sunday
'Patti Labelle Arrested After Fist Fight with Aretha Franklin
..While at the concert in Atlanta, Labelle attempted to approach Franklin to resolve their outstanding issues, but Franklin once again turned up her nose. Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly. Bystanders subdued Labelle and escorted her outside of the venue. Franklin suffered only minor injuries.'
http://tinyurl.com/owwwf5g
Steven Webb is your and my sort of choice - an impressive geek who is really interested in policy and doing stuff. His nearest counterpart is Oliver Letwin, and sadly they have roughly similar chances of becoming leaders.