Skip to content

The one party coalition of chaos – politicalbetting.com

1235»

Comments

  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,943
    viewcode said:

    @viewcode here. I need to ask a legal question: specifically what can be said regarding an ongoing case. @Cyclefree, @DavidL and other lawyers of PB, can you assist? Shouldn't take longer than five minutes.

    I've been out and am in hospital tomorrow. Maybe your query has been answered. But if not let me know.
  • isamisam Posts: 43,144



    Michael Walker
    @michaeljswalker
    ·
    9h
    If anything, this weekend proves how much Corbynism relied on John McDonnell.

    https://x.com/michaeljswalker/status/1995100749223649674

    “Embarrassing… embarrassing… embarrassing…”
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,296
    FF43 said:

    Robert Jenrick inciting hooligans to terrorise immigration judges out of their homes.

    Living with an immigration judge was never supposed to be a high-octane affair. But the humdrum of tribunal life was interrupted a few months ago when the threats started.

    “We had to leave our home – we had less than 24 hours to get out,” the partner of one judge said. They called the police, stayed with friends, and tried to make sense of how their lives had been upended.

    “It completely removes your feeling of security in your home,” the partner said. “You worry that your children will somehow get caught up in this. It turns your life upside down and nothing feels secure afterwards.”

    The ordeal started after Robert Jenrick began a campaign highlighting what the shadow justice secretary described as “activist judges”. After months of news reports and feverish online rhetoric about immigration tribunal decisions, in April the Tory frontbencher began naming judges on social media. Jenrick pledged that under his regime, “biased judges will be sacked automatically” and at the Conservative party conferencelast month he revealed that he had compiled a list of more than 30 judges who he claimed had links to “open border charities”. His posts have been circulated among far-right groups online.

    An Observer investigation has established that at least six immigration judges have been subjected to threats since April. At least two immigration judges have been advised to move out of their homes. Some have had their home addresses published on social media by far-right activists. One judge received a threat saying: “We know which bus your child catches
    ”.

    https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/immigration-judges-targeted-by-far-right-groups

    Badenoch should sack Jenrick… but she won’t.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,296

    Cookie said:

    OT - for @Sunil_Prasannan - old-timey train crossing the viaduct at Arnside this afternoon.

    This is sex
    Ummmm… no… You see, when a mummy and a daddy love each other very much, they cuddle in a special way…
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,728
    Enjoyable NFL Red Zone tonight.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,728

    FF43 said:

    Robert Jenrick inciting hooligans to terrorise immigration judges out of their homes.

    Living with an immigration judge was never supposed to be a high-octane affair. But the humdrum of tribunal life was interrupted a few months ago when the threats started.

    “We had to leave our home – we had less than 24 hours to get out,” the partner of one judge said. They called the police, stayed with friends, and tried to make sense of how their lives had been upended.

    “It completely removes your feeling of security in your home,” the partner said. “You worry that your children will somehow get caught up in this. It turns your life upside down and nothing feels secure afterwards.”

    The ordeal started after Robert Jenrick began a campaign highlighting what the shadow justice secretary described as “activist judges”. After months of news reports and feverish online rhetoric about immigration tribunal decisions, in April the Tory frontbencher began naming judges on social media. Jenrick pledged that under his regime, “biased judges will be sacked automatically” and at the Conservative party conferencelast month he revealed that he had compiled a list of more than 30 judges who he claimed had links to “open border charities”. His posts have been circulated among far-right groups online.

    An Observer investigation has established that at least six immigration judges have been subjected to threats since April. At least two immigration judges have been advised to move out of their homes. Some have had their home addresses published on social media by far-right activists. One judge received a threat saying: “We know which bus your child catches
    ”.

    https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/immigration-judges-targeted-by-far-right-groups

    Badenoch should sack Jenrick… but she won’t.
    She probably has the credit to do it in this very narrow window after the Budget response.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 45,974
    That’s some of the lads’ Christmases taken care of. There’s even a Heydrich for the real weirdos.



    https://x.com/historianblood/status/1995096497575137377?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q




  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,467

    Cookie said:

    OT - for @Sunil_Prasannan - old-timey train crossing the viaduct at Arnside this afternoon.

    This is sex
    Ummmm… no… You see, when a mummy and a daddy love each other very much, they cuddle in a special way…
    ...this can be, but doesn't have to be, on a train...
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 20,847
    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    OT - for @Sunil_Prasannan - old-timey train crossing the viaduct at Arnside this afternoon.

    This is sex
    Ummmm… no… You see, when a mummy and a daddy love each other very much, they cuddle in a special way…
    ...this can be, but doesn't have to be, on a train...
    But probably shouldn't be on the 17.43 to Shenfield.

    (Though getting off at Fratton is a euphemism for... look, you can all check. Suffice to say that Fratton is the station just before Portsmouth.)
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,128
    MaxPB said:

    "At no point were the Cabinet told about the reality of the OBR forecasts."

    https://x.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1995233439767798232


    She's done. Be gone.

    It told Reeves on October 31 that she had a £4.2billion surplus ...

    No she f###ing does not!

    The Budget deficit is in the hundreds of billions. There is no surplus! WTAF!? 😡😡😡
    Ridiculous reporting. Our journalist and MP classes are genuine morons. It's little wonder the country is fucked.
    "The current budget is the difference between total current spending (i.e. day-to-day spending excluding capital investment) and total current revenue. It is a similar measure to PSNB in that it includes all public sector current receipts plus current spending, however it excludes depreciation and capital spending." - OBR

    Presumably that means it is a kind of real-time measure of tax/revenue income vs day-to-day spending in that current year/quarter?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,296

    MaxPB said:

    "At no point were the Cabinet told about the reality of the OBR forecasts."

    https://x.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1995233439767798232


    She's done. Be gone.

    It told Reeves on October 31 that she had a £4.2billion surplus ...

    No she f###ing does not!

    The Budget deficit is in the hundreds of billions. There is no surplus! WTAF!? 😡😡😡
    Ridiculous reporting. Our journalist and MP classes are genuine morons. It's little wonder the country is fucked.
    "The current budget is the difference between total current spending (i.e. day-to-day spending excluding capital investment) and total current revenue. It is a similar measure to PSNB in that it includes all public sector current receipts plus current spending, however it excludes depreciation and capital spending." - OBR

    Presumably that means it is a kind of real-time measure of tax/revenue income vs day-to-day spending in that current year/quarter?
    And very dependent on how “capital investment” is defined.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,943
    edited 10:39PM

    FF43 said:

    Robert Jenrick inciting hooligans to terrorise immigration judges out of their homes.

    Living with an immigration judge was never supposed to be a high-octane affair. But the humdrum of tribunal life was interrupted a few months ago when the threats started.

    “We had to leave our home – we had less than 24 hours to get out,” the partner of one judge said. They called the police, stayed with friends, and tried to make sense of how their lives had been upended.

    “It completely removes your feeling of security in your home,” the partner said. “You worry that your children will somehow get caught up in this. It turns your life upside down and nothing feels secure afterwards.”

    The ordeal started after Robert Jenrick began a campaign highlighting what the shadow justice secretary described as “activist judges”. After months of news reports and feverish online rhetoric about immigration tribunal decisions, in April the Tory frontbencher began naming judges on social media. Jenrick pledged that under his regime, “biased judges will be sacked automatically” and at the Conservative party conferencelast month he revealed that he had compiled a list of more than 30 judges who he claimed had links to “open border charities”. His posts have been circulated among far-right groups online.

    An Observer investigation has established that at least six immigration judges have been subjected to threats since April. At least two immigration judges have been advised to move out of their homes. Some have had their home addresses published on social media by far-right activists. One judge received a threat saying: “We know which bus your child catches
    ”.

    https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/immigration-judges-targeted-by-far-right-groups

    Badenoch should sack Jenrick… but she won’t.
    I warned in October 2020 what this kind of rhetoric from Tory politicians would likely lead to - https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2020/10/11/enemies-within/.

    Did they bloody listen to me? Did they buggery! More fools them. And so here we are in a society which becomes ever more repulsive in small ways and big every day.

    I might add that the level of anti-Jewish rhetoric and abuse over the last few years has also created the sea in which the vile scum who murder and attack Jews swim.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 41,016

    MaxPB said:

    "At no point were the Cabinet told about the reality of the OBR forecasts."

    https://x.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1995233439767798232


    She's done. Be gone.

    It told Reeves on October 31 that she had a £4.2billion surplus ...

    No she f###ing does not!

    The Budget deficit is in the hundreds of billions. There is no surplus! WTAF!? 😡😡😡
    Ridiculous reporting. Our journalist and MP classes are genuine morons. It's little wonder the country is fucked.
    "The current budget is the difference between total current spending (i.e. day-to-day spending excluding capital investment) and total current revenue. It is a similar measure to PSNB in that it includes all public sector current receipts plus current spending, however it excludes depreciation and capital spending." - OBR

    Presumably that means it is a kind of real-time measure of tax/revenue income vs day-to-day spending in that current year/quarter?
    It's not that either, they were talking about the fiscal headroom figure which is tangentially related to the deficit. It's the amount of money the government has available to overspend or undertax and still meet the fiscal rules of having debt falling over a 5 year cycle. The OBR told Reeves that she had £4.2bn in headroom available and then Reeves went on TV and implied that there was a big blackhole which would require tax rises, which was clearly not true.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 7,106

    Cookie said:

    Cookie said:

    OT - for @Sunil_Prasannan - old-timey train crossing the viaduct at Arnside this afternoon.

    This is sex
    Ummmm… no… You see, when a mummy and a daddy love each other very much, they cuddle in a special way…
    ...this can be, but doesn't have to be, on a train...
    But probably shouldn't be on the 17.43 to Shenfield.

    (Though getting off at Fratton is a euphemism for... look, you can all check. Suffice to say that Fratton is the station just before Portsmouth.)
    Given who you may meet if you get off at Fratton, it may not help.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 7,106

    FF43 said:

    Robert Jenrick inciting hooligans to terrorise immigration judges out of their homes.

    Living with an immigration judge was never supposed to be a high-octane affair. But the humdrum of tribunal life was interrupted a few months ago when the threats started.

    “We had to leave our home – we had less than 24 hours to get out,” the partner of one judge said. They called the police, stayed with friends, and tried to make sense of how their lives had been upended.

    “It completely removes your feeling of security in your home,” the partner said. “You worry that your children will somehow get caught up in this. It turns your life upside down and nothing feels secure afterwards.”

    The ordeal started after Robert Jenrick began a campaign highlighting what the shadow justice secretary described as “activist judges”. After months of news reports and feverish online rhetoric about immigration tribunal decisions, in April the Tory frontbencher began naming judges on social media. Jenrick pledged that under his regime, “biased judges will be sacked automatically” and at the Conservative party conferencelast month he revealed that he had compiled a list of more than 30 judges who he claimed had links to “open border charities”. His posts have been circulated among far-right groups online.

    An Observer investigation has established that at least six immigration judges have been subjected to threats since April. At least two immigration judges have been advised to move out of their homes. Some have had their home addresses published on social media by far-right activists. One judge received a threat saying: “We know which bus your child catches
    ”.

    https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/immigration-judges-targeted-by-far-right-groups

    Badenoch should sack Jenrick… but she won’t.
    The only way I would vote for Farage is if the only alternative is Jenrick.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 20,847
    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    "At no point were the Cabinet told about the reality of the OBR forecasts."

    https://x.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1995233439767798232


    She's done. Be gone.

    It told Reeves on October 31 that she had a £4.2billion surplus ...

    No she f###ing does not!

    The Budget deficit is in the hundreds of billions. There is no surplus! WTAF!? 😡😡😡
    Ridiculous reporting. Our journalist and MP classes are genuine morons. It's little wonder the country is fucked.
    "The current budget is the difference between total current spending (i.e. day-to-day spending excluding capital investment) and total current revenue. It is a similar measure to PSNB in that it includes all public sector current receipts plus current spending, however it excludes depreciation and capital spending." - OBR

    Presumably that means it is a kind of real-time measure of tax/revenue income vs day-to-day spending in that current year/quarter?
    It's not that either, they were talking about the fiscal headroom figure which is tangentially related to the deficit. It's the amount of money the government has available to overspend or undertax and still meet the fiscal rules of having debt falling over a 5 year cycle. The OBR told Reeves that she had £4.2bn in headroom available and then Reeves went on TV and implied that there was a big blackhole which would require tax rises, which was clearly not true.
    Though you would surely have to be insane to run the fiscal headroom down to zero.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 41,016

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    "At no point were the Cabinet told about the reality of the OBR forecasts."

    https://x.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1995233439767798232


    She's done. Be gone.

    It told Reeves on October 31 that she had a £4.2billion surplus ...

    No she f###ing does not!

    The Budget deficit is in the hundreds of billions. There is no surplus! WTAF!? 😡😡😡
    Ridiculous reporting. Our journalist and MP classes are genuine morons. It's little wonder the country is fucked.
    "The current budget is the difference between total current spending (i.e. day-to-day spending excluding capital investment) and total current revenue. It is a similar measure to PSNB in that it includes all public sector current receipts plus current spending, however it excludes depreciation and capital spending." - OBR

    Presumably that means it is a kind of real-time measure of tax/revenue income vs day-to-day spending in that current year/quarter?
    It's not that either, they were talking about the fiscal headroom figure which is tangentially related to the deficit. It's the amount of money the government has available to overspend or undertax and still meet the fiscal rules of having debt falling over a 5 year cycle. The OBR told Reeves that she had £4.2bn in headroom available and then Reeves went on TV and implied that there was a big blackhole which would require tax rises, which was clearly not true.
    Though you would surely have to be insane to run the fiscal headroom down to zero.
    I don't disagree with you but it was an outright lie that the government had a new fiscal blackhole. That lie kicked off months of speculation on tax rises which damaged investment and jobs. She needs to resign for that.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,128

    Andrew Lilico
    @andrew_lilico
    ·
    1h
    Bad enough lying to the public & the markets. But lying to the Cabinet?? They're not coming back from this. It's only a matter of time now.

    https://x.com/andrew_lilico/status/1995239893442969810
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 26,935
    Cyclefree said:

    viewcode said:

    @viewcode here. I need to ask a legal question: specifically what can be said regarding an ongoing case. @Cyclefree, DavidL and other lawyers of PB, can you assist? Shouldn't take longer than five minutes.

    I've been out and am in hospital tomorrow. Maybe your query has been answered. But if not let me know.
    Thank you. I have PM'd you.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,296


    Andrew Lilico
    @andrew_lilico
    ·
    1h
    Bad enough lying to the public & the markets. But lying to the Cabinet?? They're not coming back from this. It's only a matter of time now.

    https://x.com/andrew_lilico/status/1995239893442969810

    People can bet on Starmer and/or Reeves going in 2026 (or even 2025) if they want, but I’d still lay.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 21,151
    From the title I thought this was a reference to Your Party, but it fits for the government too.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,128

    Farrukh
    @implausibleblog

    Luke Tryl, More In Common Polling, "Whilst that infighting has been going on, Zack Polanksi has been having by any measure an immensely impressive start as leader of The Greens"

    "He's almost positioned The Greens as the best vehicle for disillusioned progressives and is rising in the polls as a result"

    "I just wonder if the infighting between Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana, and the rise of The Green Party, might mean that Your Party has lost its moment"

    https://x.com/implausibleblog/status/1995205176764833906


    yah think?

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 83,946
    Good thread.

    History is full of foreigners who thought they could profit by cozying up to Russia. It always ends the same way: they lose everything.
    https://x.com/KuldkeppMart/status/1995072734657941916
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,128
    edited 11:07PM
    ++ Betting Post ++


    Andrew Lilico
    @andrew_lilico
    I think we can safely begin the serious phase of the "Who will succeed Starmer?" discourse now. Whom is your money on & why?

    https://x.com/andrew_lilico/status/1995259192823947526


    Edit: Looking at my own betfair account - I'm saying Rayner or wee dougie.

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 33,352
    Cyclefree said:

    FF43 said:

    Robert Jenrick inciting hooligans to terrorise immigration judges out of their homes.

    Living with an immigration judge was never supposed to be a high-octane affair. But the humdrum of tribunal life was interrupted a few months ago when the threats started.

    “We had to leave our home – we had less than 24 hours to get out,” the partner of one judge said. They called the police, stayed with friends, and tried to make sense of how their lives had been upended.

    “It completely removes your feeling of security in your home,” the partner said. “You worry that your children will somehow get caught up in this. It turns your life upside down and nothing feels secure afterwards.”

    The ordeal started after Robert Jenrick began a campaign highlighting what the shadow justice secretary described as “activist judges”. After months of news reports and feverish online rhetoric about immigration tribunal decisions, in April the Tory frontbencher began naming judges on social media. Jenrick pledged that under his regime, “biased judges will be sacked automatically” and at the Conservative party conferencelast month he revealed that he had compiled a list of more than 30 judges who he claimed had links to “open border charities”. His posts have been circulated among far-right groups online.

    An Observer investigation has established that at least six immigration judges have been subjected to threats since April. At least two immigration judges have been advised to move out of their homes. Some have had their home addresses published on social media by far-right activists. One judge received a threat saying: “We know which bus your child catches
    ”.

    https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/immigration-judges-targeted-by-far-right-groups

    Badenoch should sack Jenrick… but she won’t.
    I warned in October 2020 what this kind of rhetoric from Tory politicians would likely lead to - https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2020/10/11/enemies-within/.

    Did they bloody listen to me? Did they buggery! More fools them. And so here we are in a society which becomes ever more repulsive in small ways and big every day.

    I might add that the level of anti-Jewish rhetoric and abuse over the last few years has also created the sea in which the vile scum who murder and attack Jews swim.
    Leaving to one side your point about anti-Jewish sentiment, I don't think Jenrick has done anything wrong. One can feel sympathy with difficult personal circumstances whilst still recognising that it is utterly unacceptable and unjustifiable for judges to be political activists. I think if you place real importance on the impartiality of judges as I know that you do, this should be obvious. Such people do not deserve to have their lives and children threatened with violence, but they do deserve dismissal as judges.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 33,352

    Cyclefree said:

    viewcode said:

    @viewcode here. I need to ask a legal question: specifically what can be said regarding an ongoing case. @Cyclefree, @DavidL and other lawyers of PB, can you assist? Shouldn't take longer than five minutes.

    I've been out and am in hospital tomorrow. Maybe your query has been answered. But if not let me know.
    Hope all goes well tomorrow.
    Same. Best of luck, stay positive.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 33,352
    Nigelb said:

    Good thread.

    History is full of foreigners who thought they could profit by cozying up to Russia. It always ends the same way: they lose everything.
    https://x.com/KuldkeppMart/status/1995072734657941916

    Cosying.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 83,946

    Nigelb said:

    Good thread.

    History is full of foreigners who thought they could profit by cozying up to Russia. It always ends the same way: they lose everything.
    https://x.com/KuldkeppMart/status/1995072734657941916

    Cosying.
    They're Americans.
    Do you not understand that they spell their way and not yours ?

    Just wait until you discover that some countries have their own completely different languages...
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 33,352
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Good thread.

    History is full of foreigners who thought they could profit by cozying up to Russia. It always ends the same way: they lose everything.
    https://x.com/KuldkeppMart/status/1995072734657941916

    Cosying.
    They're Americans.
    Do you not understand that they spell their way and not yours ?

    Just wait until you discover that some countries have their own completely different languages...
    It says he's a professor at UCL on his Twitter bio. Hopefully he doesn't teach spelling.
Sign In or Register to comment.