Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Winning here! Could the Lib Dems win more seats than the Tories? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,479
edited May 21 in General
Winning here! Could the Lib Dems win more seats than the Tories? – politicalbetting.com

Ladbrokes have put up a market on whether they will win more seats than the Tories at the next election, I have previously noted the gap between the Tories and Lib Dems has never been closer as we can see in the chart above even before the Reform surge.

Read the full story here

«13456

Comments

  • eekeek Posts: 30,023
    edited May 21
    Yes because what is left of the Tory vote isn’t going to be efficient, it’s at best 5% in some areas and 28% in others and neither of those is going to win you seats
  • IcarusIcarus Posts: 1,012
    is there a market for parties getting more seats than Labour?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,023
    edited May 21
    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,023
    Icarus said:

    is there a market for parties getting more seats than Labour?

    Not that I am aware of.
  • eekeek Posts: 30,023

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It’s rare for their to be a match were both teams deserve to lose.

    On the basis that Ratcliffe owns Man Utd though - you have to want Tottenham to win but it’s a tough decision.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,681

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It's pretty damning that a major European trophy will go to one or other British team just above the relegation zone in their domestic league.
  • TazTaz Posts: 18,318
    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,465
    £9,99 on. (Max allowed !) I think these prices are the wrong way round quite honestly.
  • TazTaz Posts: 18,318
    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 122,023
    Foxy said:

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It's pretty damning that a major European trophy will go to one or other British team just above the relegation zone in their domestic league.
    It proves the Premier League is the best league in the world.

    There's a reason why England has won an extra place in next season's Champions League.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,318
    Foxy said:

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It's pretty damning that a major European trophy will go to one or other British team just above the relegation zone in their domestic league.
    United are unbeaten in the Europa league but utterly dreadful in the league

    I have no idea which team turns up tonight but that is where the result lies
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,520
    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,318
    edited May 21
    It is perfectly possible for the Lib Dems to gain more seats that the conservatives at the next election but in those circumstances I would expect them to remain the third party behind Reform and Labour

    Re Labour, I posted this on the last thread

    https://news.sky.com/story/revealed-why-keir-starmers-strategy-to-tackle-reform-uk-could-end-up-backfiring-13371866
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 7,038
    So Rachel from Accounts has forced up inflation.. yet more pain for the UK.
    She really is useless.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,318
    edited May 21
    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    See my post at 7.35
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 7,038
    edited May 21
    ... and then, by all accounts, she is going to attack Isas.. fill your boots up to the max 20k this yr if you can.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,539
    Icarus said:

    is there a market for parties getting more seats than Labour?

    On BF you can lay Labour most seats
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,539
    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,520

    It is perfectly possible for the Lib Dems to gain more seats that the conservatives at the next election but in those circumstances I would expect them to remain the third party behind Reform and Labour

    Re Labour, I posted this on the last thread

    https://news.sky.com/story/revealed-why-keir-starmers-strategy-to-tackle-reform-uk-could-end-up-backfiring-13371866

    Do No 10 actually look at data from the polling ? One wonders !

    The biggest threat to Labour in the Red Wall is the collapse of the Tory vote to Reform not Labour to Reform switchers .

    Starmers useless advisor needs to go !
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,607

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    Hard to care either way. Mildly amusing that Nice made the Champions League. Guess there will be a workaround so that both Nice and Man Utd can compete in the Champions League next season if Man Utd win tonight.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166
    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!
  • TimSTimS Posts: 15,392

    So Rachel from Accounts has forced up inflation.. yet more pain for the UK.
    She really is useless.

    Different features in today’s inflation stats, with different economic implications.

    - household bill inflation a major contributor: bad news, though some of it (energy) should go into reverse soon
    - The rest of services inflation seems to be driven by wage rises: some down to NI (bad), but the rest down to net wage growth (good)
    - Remaining goods inflation is down, thanks to falling oil prices and stronger pound (good)

    The fundamentals are not bad at the moment. Services inflation combined with goods deflation generally means good news for UK economic growth.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,465
    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
  • boulayboulay Posts: 6,220

    Foxy said:

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It's pretty damning that a major European trophy will go to one or other British team just above the relegation zone in their domestic league.
    It proves the Premier League is the best league in the world.

    There's a reason why England has won an extra place in next season's Champions League.
    I seem to remember when Spanish and other countries teams were dominating the UEFA cup us English said that our league was too good to focus on such trivial competitions as the premier league was a bigger and tougher tournament.

    Also the fact that we only had one team in the Semis of the Chanpions League (granted Liverpool were very unfortunate with the draw for the knock-outs and could have got Barca’s route) suggests we aren’t the best league.

    To counter the above, we have the most gruelling and fierce league so when our clubs are at the Arsenal end of the season in Europe they have been battering away all season whilst a lot of other top clubs in Europe have plenty of league games they can ease up and rest players - English clubs do t have that luxury.

    This can be demonstrated by how when Spurs and Man U were able to ease off in the league as they were going nowhere but there were three guaranteed worse teams, they eased off in the league and focussed on the UEFA cup. It’s v v unusual for English teams with such resources to be in this position.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166
    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
  • vikvik Posts: 401

    It is perfectly possible for the Lib Dems to gain more seats that the conservatives at the next election but in those circumstances I would expect them to remain the third party behind Reform and Labour

    Re Labour, I posted this on the last thread

    https://news.sky.com/story/revealed-why-keir-starmers-strategy-to-tackle-reform-uk-could-end-up-backfiring-13371866

    Peter Kellner says something similar in his blog post:

    https://kellnerp.substack.com/p/starmers-biggest-mistake-is-taking
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,329

    ... and then, by all accounts, she is going to attack Isas.. fill your boots up to the max 20k this yr if you can.

    I would be surprised if the percentage of the population who is able to save £20k a year is above the single digits
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 10,619
    The inflation looks like non-motoring transport costs, energy, food and drink. That's not good for Labour's core voter demographics.

    My theory is that inflation is by far the most important economic indicator for politics, even if real wages are increasing. We've got used to it being below 3% since the Sunak Spike. They need to convert some of the positive vibes on renewable energy into something tangible in the next 12 months - some sort of reform, perhaps a tax cut on electricity (and increase on gas). Something.
  • TazTaz Posts: 18,318
    Pulpstar said:

    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
    She’s shit
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 18,661
    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    On the other hand, ghastly as they are, it's reasonably easy to picture the sort of seat that has a Lib Dem MP. It's leafy and has a Gail's in its bustling High Street. Reform constituencies are similarly easy to envision.

    What even is a generic Conservative seat these days?

    In terms of the header, there must be a decent wedge of seats that only stayed blue because LibLab voters didn't realise that they could turf out their Conservative MP by tactical voting. A lot of them will be drowning in Two Horse Race clipart come the next election, and that tends to work.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,635
    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091
    Pulpstar said:

    £9,99 on. (Max allowed !) I think these prices are the wrong way round quite honestly.

    On current trends, it will be a taxi for the Tories, whilst the LDs are in the 60-100 seats box.

    So, yes.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,329

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    On the other hand, ghastly as they are, it's reasonably easy to picture the sort of seat that has a Lib Dem MP. It's leafy and has a Gail's in its bustling High Street. Reform constituencies are similarly easy to envision.

    What even is a generic Conservative seat these days?

    In terms of the header, there must be a decent wedge of seats that only stayed blue because LibLab voters didn't realise that they could turf out their Conservative MP by tactical voting. A lot of them will be drowning in Two Horse Race clipart come the next election, and that tends to work.
    Solihull has a Gails and I can’t see it electing a Lib Dem again any time soon
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 10,619

    ... and then, by all accounts, she is going to attack Isas.. fill your boots up to the max 20k this yr if you can.

    I would be surprised if the percentage of the population who is able to save £20k a year is above the single digits
    I think MattW suggested it was 7% on the last thread. The magic number for privately educated too.

    Occasionally, PBs demographics skew the debate. That's particularly the case on something like ISAs.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091
    Pulpstar said:

    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
    The clear space in the market for the Tories, which neither Reform or Labour are touching, are sensible economics and public finances.

    But, Kemi wants to play full Kampfkrieg instead.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 10,619
    edited May 21

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091
    Icarus said:

    is there a market for parties getting more seats than Labour?

    Next General Election Most Seats should be a good proxy.

    If any party gets more seats than Labour, it's likely to have the most seats period.
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,707
    Well done,Young Eagles. That's another good recommendation. You really are getting the hang of this sort of thing. Not quite the 14/1 you kept so quiet about, but a sound investment anyway. True, it does tie up the lolly for a while but always nice to have a winner bobbing quietly along some way ahead.

    Keep it up. (The tipping, that is.)
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,249

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    Crocodile tears for a week or two TUD
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,788
    edited May 21

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    Without wishing to sound like @Leon after he's had a few:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/4561153/#Comment_4561153

    It is developing much as I expected it to. I am slightly surprised it is going on for this long, but of course the longer it continues the longer Netanyahu stays out of prison.
  • TazTaz Posts: 18,318


    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,520
    malcolmg said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    Crocodile tears for a week or two TUD
    Yes it’s all too little too late . Netenyahu has stopped aid for 11 weeks and only now do we get any strong criticism. It’s pathetic.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,329
    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    I am also not sure whether Ed Davey is a meme or a serious politician
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091
    vik said:

    It is perfectly possible for the Lib Dems to gain more seats that the conservatives at the next election but in those circumstances I would expect them to remain the third party behind Reform and Labour

    Re Labour, I posted this on the last thread

    https://news.sky.com/story/revealed-why-keir-starmers-strategy-to-tackle-reform-uk-could-end-up-backfiring-13371866

    Peter Kellner says something similar in his blog post:

    https://kellnerp.substack.com/p/starmers-biggest-mistake-is-taking
    It's an incomplete analysis because taking the heat out of the biggest issue driving Reform, and bursting its bubble, is in his interests.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,539
    edited May 21
    vik said:

    It is perfectly possible for the Lib Dems to gain more seats that the conservatives at the next election but in those circumstances I would expect them to remain the third party behind Reform and Labour

    Re Labour, I posted this on the last thread

    https://news.sky.com/story/revealed-why-keir-starmers-strategy-to-tackle-reform-uk-could-end-up-backfiring-13371866

    Peter Kellner says something similar in his blog post:

    https://kellnerp.substack.com/p/starmers-biggest-mistake-is-taking
    Also interesting in Kellner's analysis to look at the further vote share headroom for each party - the gap between the proportion of the electorate who would seriously consider voting for them and the proportion that are currently saying that they will. For both LibDems and Tory this is 10%, for Labour 6%, and for Reform 4%. Given that most of the unsympathetic voters are actually hostile to Reform, this suggests we are getting close to peak Reform in the polls.

    And this is also a key quote:

    Since Starmer became Prime Minister and Racher Reeves went to the Treasury, they have restricted the winter fuel allowance, cut overseas aid, diluted their climate change policies, reduced disability benefits, prepared public spending cuts, moved right on immigration, and offered Donald Trump a state visit. Dislike of these policies extends well beyond the Corbynite left. (We shall discover in due course how pro-European voters judge the government’s deals with the EU.)
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    As always there, we don't have an easy solution. Israel are doing terrible things to the Gazans. Hamas are doing terrible things to the Gazans. The international community doesn't want to intervene because it can't reward either side, and nobody is up for becoming the impartial military presence that gets murdered by Hamas
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,788

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    I am also not sure whether Ed Davey is a meme or a serious politician
    He would have been the greatest wet politician in the country but for Sunak's lack of an umbrella.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 18,661
    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    But do Conservatives want to stick it out one more election? Even if they survive another defeat on an institutional level, that puts resurrection too far away on a personal career level.

    There's also an element of using rationality to justify the thing I want to do anyway (Hello Morgan! I'm sure you're reading this too.) For ages, some on the Conservative right have looked wistfully at Canada, where a populist party called Reform swallowed the wetter Conservatives whole.

    The catch is that it's not a brilliant tool for winning general elections. If we start the clock in 1993 (Kim Campbell: 2 seats), the Canadian right has been in opposition for 22 years out of 31.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,539
    Would you believe, this morning round these parts there's water actually falling from the sky!
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,329

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    As always there, we don't have an easy solution. Israel are doing terrible things to the Gazans. Hamas are doing terrible things to the Gazans. The international community doesn't want to intervene because it can't reward either side, and nobody is up for becoming the impartial military presence that gets murdered by Hamas
    October 2026 for the next Knesset election
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,681
    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Being strong in the Home Counties is no more wrong than Reform being strong in the old coalfields and East Coast. All parts of the country need representation, and while I am not so keen on the economic domination of the country by London and the SE, the weakness of Reform on economic policy shows there. For Reform to function as a government they need a coherent policy agenda broader than being beastly to foreigners.

    Lib Dems are present all across the land, and have some of the most even demographics by age and geography of all parties. It's why we are the second party now on Leics County Council, with a minority Reform control. It's already Reform vs LibDems in some parts of the country.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,788

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    As always there, we don't have an easy solution. Israel are doing terrible things to the Gazans. Hamas are doing terrible things to the Gazans. The international community doesn't want to intervene because it can't reward either side, and nobody is up for becoming the impartial military presence that gets murdered by Hamas
    October 2026 for the next Knesset election
    So we can be fairly sure if there is anything left of Gaza the fighting will be going on until then at the earliest.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,751
    Reform are, however, doing very well in a lot of historically Labour areas (even if they don't appeal to the areas that have more recently become safe Labour, like university constituencies, and most of London).

    That's on the back of the non-Labour vote that always existed in such seats simply switching behind them, former non-voters coming out to support them, as in the EU referendum, and *enough* ex-Labour voters switching (the BSkyB article which tracks 2005 voters, who now vote Reform, shows 20% voted Labour, twenty years ago.)

    Labour could make a strategic choice, to just write off such areas, in order to keep the newer areas, and Lib Dem and Green voters on board, but that has risks of its own.

    Labour's gamble is that left wing voters will still support them tactically in 2029, and if it's a choice between Labour and Reform, most probably will do, reluctantly.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166
    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    You can elect any colour you like to the council - the budget deficit and annual ever shrinking funding crisis remain the same. There are a few odd pockets of competence where a brilliant officers team and "yeah lets do that" councillors are warding off the worst of it. But in most places the decline is terminal by means of LabCon government policy to bankrupt local authorities.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,329
    In other news, my train is arriving at Waverley and the sun seems to have disappeared
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,520

    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    But do Conservatives want to stick it out one more election? Even if they survive another defeat on an institutional level, that puts resurrection too far away on a personal career level.

    There's also an element of using rationality to justify the thing I want to do anyway (Hello Morgan! I'm sure you're reading this too.) For ages, some on the Conservative right have looked wistfully at Canada, where a populist party called Reform swallowed the wetter Conservatives whole.

    The catch is that it's not a brilliant tool for winning general elections. If we start the clock in 1993 (Kim Campbell: 2 seats), the Canadian right has been in opposition for 22 years out of 31.
    As happened in France the Republicans there imploded with many of their voters heading towards RN . We haven’t yet got the harder left here and I doubt we will unless there’s a change to our voting system .
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,874
    Not a value bet until the LibDems start winning across the Midlands.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,513
    When the LDs are in government on their own, it will be interesting to watch how they merge the conflicting local priorities to which they're committed.

    Good morning, everyone.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,607

    In other news, my train is arriving at Waverley and the sun seems to have disappeared

    All those drought stories last week...
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,681

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166
    Sean_F said:

    Reform are, however, doing very well in a lot of historically Labour areas (even if they don't appeal to the areas that have more recently become safe Labour, like university constituencies, and most of London).

    That's on the back of the non-Labour vote that always existed in such seats simply switching behind them, former non-voters coming out to support them, as in the EU referendum, and *enough* ex-Labour voters switching (the BSkyB article which tracks 2005 voters, who now vote Reform, shows 20% voted Labour, twenty years ago.)

    Labour could make a strategic choice, to just write off such areas, in order to keep the newer areas, and Lib Dem and Green voters on board, but that has risks of its own.

    Labour's gamble is that left wing voters will still support them tactically in 2029, and if it's a choice between Labour and Reform, most probably will do, reluctantly.

    Or - radical idea - Labour could address the issues which are driving people towards voting Reform. I want them to use their imagination - consider that one day YOU might be the government, might have been elected into office with the power to actually change things for the better. A crazy dream, but one day Labour might actually be the government - so what would be the plan?

    Remember Blair telling Major that he was "in office but not in power"? That's Labour today. Occupying the ministries whilst doing fuck all of any real consequence.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,625
    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    The Waitrose and Waspi party.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 15,392
    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091
    Sean_F said:

    Reform are, however, doing very well in a lot of historically Labour areas (even if they don't appeal to the areas that have more recently become safe Labour, like university constituencies, and most of London).

    That's on the back of the non-Labour vote that always existed in such seats simply switching behind them, former non-voters coming out to support them, as in the EU referendum, and *enough* ex-Labour voters switching (the BSkyB article which tracks 2005 voters, who now vote Reform, shows 20% voted Labour, twenty years ago.)

    Labour could make a strategic choice, to just write off such areas, in order to keep the newer areas, and Lib Dem and Green voters on board, but that has risks of its own.

    Labour's gamble is that left wing voters will still support them tactically in 2029, and if it's a choice between Labour and Reform, most probably will do, reluctantly.

    Such a strategy could get Labour to perhaps 250 seats, but not a majority.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 63,091
    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    I'm surprised we agree, but pleased we do.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,625
    Reports that Angela Rayner wants to increase taxes on pensions.

    I wonder if that includes repealing this law:

    The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2588/contents/made
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 5,520
    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    The situation in Gaza will always resonate more as it’s easier for the public to pick their side as in good v evil , also it has more impact here in the UK , and we’ve had years and years of constant coverage.

  • eekeek Posts: 30,023
    edited May 21
    tlg86 said:

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    Hard to care either way. Mildly amusing that Nice made the Champions League. Guess there will be a workaround so that both Nice and Man Utd can compete in the Champions League next season if Man Utd win tonight.
    There shouldn't be but on the basis of most entertainment I now want Man utd to win and for Radcliffe to have to sell his Nice / Man Utd holding rapidly or be forced to decide which team can enter.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,539
    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    I'd venture a guess that Casino isn't tossing and turning at night worrying about Sudan or the Eastern Congo, either?
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 18,661
    nico67 said:

    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    But do Conservatives want to stick it out one more election? Even if they survive another defeat on an institutional level, that puts resurrection too far away on a personal career level.

    There's also an element of using rationality to justify the thing I want to do anyway (Hello Morgan! I'm sure you're reading this too.) For ages, some on the Conservative right have looked wistfully at Canada, where a populist party called Reform swallowed the wetter Conservatives whole.

    The catch is that it's not a brilliant tool for winning general elections. If we start the clock in 1993 (Kim Campbell: 2 seats), the Canadian right has been in opposition for 22 years out of 31.
    As happened in France the Republicans there imploded with many of their voters heading towards RN . We haven’t yet got the harder left here and I doubt we will unless there’s a change to our voting system .
    Many, but rarely enough.

    I may be doing motivated reasoning here, but I think that a centre-right party can attract reluctant right wing voters more effectively than a right-wing party can attract reluctant centre-right voters. Combination of different toxicity and availability of alternatives.

    Another data point is 2019: big Conservative win because Reform stood down in Conservative seats.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,635

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    As always there, we don't have an easy solution. Israel are doing terrible things to the Gazans. Hamas are doing terrible things to the Gazans. The international community doesn't want to intervene because it can't reward either side, and nobody is up for becoming the impartial military presence that gets murdered by Hamas
    I’ve not hitherto noticed much reluctance to ‘reward’ Israel with arms, aid, intelligence, political support and allowing them to participate in the cultural rituals of the civilised(sic) west, eg sport, Eurovision etc.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,874
    edited May 21
    TimS said:

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

    "planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed"

    Strangely, that development is never needed round the neighbourhood of LibDems.

    It's a regular feature that after LibDems have had local power for a while, the voters routinely turf them out, unimpressed.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,577
    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    The Israeli response is openly genocidal. Hamas are also openly genocidal. (Yes, that's bothsideism. But it's also true.)

    The issue is that we, in the west, have generally supported Israel, for many complex reasons, including historical ones. We have not directly supported Hamas. Now the Israeli government are being openly genocidal, the question is how long we can continue to support them.

    I don't think it is a question of us having to support them or they will get crushed by Hamas. But the Israeli government do need to understand that we have zero support for the way they are acting. In fact, that we condemn it.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 14,279

    TimS said:

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

    "planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed"

    Strangely, that development is never needed round the neighbourhood of LibDems.

    It's a regular feature that after LibDems have had local power for a while, the voters routinely turf them out, unimpressed.
    The Orkney & Shetland constituency has been LibDem/Liberal since 1950. Sutton council has been LibDem since 1990.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 55,355
    Pulpstar said:

    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
    It's, its almost as if the £18bn she splurged on wage increases for the public sector after the election has bled through into higher prices (with more to come from NI). In fairness, it also boosted consumption somewhat giving 1 month's decent growth.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    As always there, we don't have an easy solution. Israel are doing terrible things to the Gazans. Hamas are doing terrible things to the Gazans. The international community doesn't want to intervene because it can't reward either side, and nobody is up for becoming the impartial military presence that gets murdered by Hamas
    I’ve not hitherto noticed much reluctance to ‘reward’ Israel with arms, aid, intelligence, political support and allowing them to participate in the cultural rituals of the civilised(sic) west, eg sport, Eurovision etc.
    We shouldn't be selling them arms, but I have no objection to them being involved in things like Eurovision. They are a democracy, and the current phase of this war was started by Hamas slaughtering civilians. Its a completely different scenario to Russia's actions in Ukraine and its subsequent bans.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 14,293
    nico67 said:

    It is perfectly possible for the Lib Dems to gain more seats that the conservatives at the next election but in those circumstances I would expect them to remain the third party behind Reform and Labour

    Re Labour, I posted this on the last thread

    https://news.sky.com/story/revealed-why-keir-starmers-strategy-to-tackle-reform-uk-could-end-up-backfiring-13371866

    Do No 10 actually look at data from the polling ? One wonders !

    The biggest threat to Labour in the Red Wall is the collapse of the Tory vote to Reform not Labour to Reform switchers .

    Starmers useless advisor needs to go !
    At the moment the LDs have a particular field all to themselves - the large area of those who won't vote Green because they are not serious, and won't vote for a party that is either Reform or chasing potential Reform voters.

    How much I don't know, (could it be up to 30% of all voters?) but this gives them potential on the upside and I think this is why they are slowly firming upwards in the polls.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 7,038

    ... and then, by all accounts, she is going to attack Isas.. fill your boots up to the max 20k this yr if you can.

    I would be surprised if the percentage of the population who is able to save £20k a year is above the single digits
    So if Rachel from Accounts reduces it to 4k and 60pc are affected.. will you squeal then. ?
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 4,631

    TimS said:

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

    "planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed"

    Strangely, that development is never needed round the neighbourhood of LibDems.

    It's a regular feature that after LibDems have had local power for a while, the voters routinely turf them out, unimpressed.
    evidenced or confirmation bias on your part?
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 14,293

    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    The Israeli response is openly genocidal. Hamas are also openly genocidal. (Yes, that's bothsideism. But it's also true.)

    The issue is that we, in the west, have generally supported Israel, for many complex reasons, including historical ones. We have not directly supported Hamas. Now the Israeli government are being openly genocidal, the question is how long we can continue to support them.

    I don't think it is a question of us having to support them or they will get crushed by Hamas. But the Israeli government do need to understand that we have zero support for the way they are acting. In fact, that we condemn it.
    Peter Tatchell stands for millions of us who don't demonstrate against the wickedness of all sides and in support of babies and children, and ordinary people everywhere.

    Bt the way, loads more ordinary people (including babies and children) are being crushed and killed in Sudan than Israel/Gaza and no-one in the west seems to care much.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,874

    TimS said:

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

    "planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed"

    Strangely, that development is never needed round the neighbourhood of LibDems.

    It's a regular feature that after LibDems have had local power for a while, the voters routinely turf them out, unimpressed.
    The Orkney & Shetland constituency has been LibDem/Liberal since 1950. Sutton council has been LibDem since 1990.
    Whoopeedoo. Hardly gaining then losing Liverpool, Sheffield, Bristol...
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,518
    DavidL said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
    It's, its almost as if the £18bn she splurged on wage increases for the public sector after the election has bled through into higher prices (with more to come from NI). In fairness, it also boosted consumption somewhat giving 1 month's decent growth.
    And probably more to come as doctors are voting on strike action over pay again in a few days
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 11,518

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    As always there, we don't have an easy solution. Israel are doing terrible things to the Gazans. Hamas are doing terrible things to the Gazans. The international community doesn't want to intervene because it can't reward either side, and nobody is up for becoming the impartial military presence that gets murdered by Hamas
    I’ve not hitherto noticed much reluctance to ‘reward’ Israel with arms, aid, intelligence, political support and allowing them to participate in the cultural rituals of the civilised(sic) west, eg sport, Eurovision etc.
    We shouldn't be selling them arms, but I have no objection to them being involved in things like Eurovision. They are a democracy, and the current phase of this war was started by Hamas slaughtering civilians. Its a completely different scenario to Russia's actions in Ukraine and its subsequent bans.
    Perhaps if we invited Hamas to participate in Eurovision that could make it their "battleground" instead of actually killing each other :)
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 5,049
    Foxy said:

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It's pretty damning that a major European trophy will go to one or other British team just above the relegation zone in their domestic league.
    You mean it's damning of the strength of other European leagues, I presume.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 18,661

    TimS said:

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

    "planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed"

    Strangely, that development is never needed round the neighbourhood of LibDems.

    It's a regular feature that after LibDems have had local power for a while, the voters routinely turf them out, unimpressed.
    The Orkney & Shetland constituency has been LibDem/Liberal since 1950. Sutton council has been LibDem since 1990.
    Whoopeedoo. Hardly gaining then losing Liverpool, Sheffield, Bristol...
    Somewhat different this time, and I know how expensive that phrase is.

    For a long time, Liberal campaigning was essentially opportunistic- a by-election or a handful of determined activists burning the sandal leather. Community campaigning, Focus teams and all that. That let them build in a spotty way up to 2010, when the lack of coherence bit them... everywhere really.

    This iteration of the yellow peril looks a lot more coherent. That's more powerful in the long term.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 30,166
    algarkirk said:

    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    The Israeli response is openly genocidal. Hamas are also openly genocidal. (Yes, that's bothsideism. But it's also true.)

    The issue is that we, in the west, have generally supported Israel, for many complex reasons, including historical ones. We have not directly supported Hamas. Now the Israeli government are being openly genocidal, the question is how long we can continue to support them.

    I don't think it is a question of us having to support them or they will get crushed by Hamas. But the Israeli government do need to understand that we have zero support for the way they are acting. In fact, that we condemn it.
    Peter Tatchell stands for millions of us who don't demonstrate against the wickedness of all sides and in support of babies and children, and ordinary people everywhere.

    Bt the way, loads more ordinary people (including babies and children) are being crushed and killed in Sudan than Israel/Gaza and no-one in the west seems to care much.
    We know why Israel uniquely gets the attention - antisemitism.
  • DoctorGDoctorG Posts: 65
    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    The UK could end up like Australia, with Labor and the Liberals the two main parties ...
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,689
    DavidL said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
    It's, its almost as if the £18bn she splurged on wage increases for the public sector after the election has bled through into higher prices (with more to come from NI). In fairness, it also boosted consumption somewhat giving 1 month's decent growth.
    In which case, surely it's a one-off due to additional costs in April. Inflation will now tend to stick around the same level and fall back next April when presumably prices won't rise by 1.2% in a month
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,046

    Foxy said:

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    It's pretty damning that a major European trophy will go to one or other British team just above the relegation zone in their domestic league.
    United are unbeaten in the Europa league but utterly dreadful in the league

    I have no idea which team turns up tonight but that is where the result lies
    For the first time this season no clubs dropped down from the Champions League to the Europa League significantly reducing the quality of clubs in the competition at the later stages. Neither of the teams in the final deserve to be anywhere near the Champions League next season.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,635
    algarkirk said:

    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    The Israeli response is openly genocidal. Hamas are also openly genocidal. (Yes, that's bothsideism. But it's also true.)

    The issue is that we, in the west, have generally supported Israel, for many complex reasons, including historical ones. We have not directly supported Hamas. Now the Israeli government are being openly genocidal, the question is how long we can continue to support them.

    I don't think it is a question of us having to support them or they will get crushed by Hamas. But the Israeli government do need to understand that we have zero support for the way they are acting. In fact, that we condemn it.
    Peter Tatchell stands for millions of us who don't demonstrate against the wickedness of all sides and in support of babies and children, and ordinary people everywhere.

    Bt the way, loads more ordinary people (including babies and children) are being crushed and killed in Sudan than Israel/Gaza and no-one in the west seems to care much.
    Perhaps in the unlikely event of the RSF or SAF claiming that Sudan should be accounted as part of the civilised world we might be more bothered?
    The bottom line is that Israel in the form of Bibi and his horrible coalition are desperate to be thought of as a bulwark of western democracy while blowing up their neighbours, killing their kids and stealing their land, aka having their cake and gluttonously gobbling it down.
  • DoctorGDoctorG Posts: 65

    Any thoughts on El Shitico tonight?

    Spurs have beaten Manchester United three times this season.

    Or are we expecting Spurs to be Spursy again?

    Last time Spurs met an English side in a European final.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VzNx27VAXw

    Spurs to win as per my predictions comment at end January (I've cursed them now)

    Has any other UEFA nation ever had 6 Champions League entrants in a season?
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,625

    nico67 said:

    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    But do Conservatives want to stick it out one more election? Even if they survive another defeat on an institutional level, that puts resurrection too far away on a personal career level.

    There's also an element of using rationality to justify the thing I want to do anyway (Hello Morgan! I'm sure you're reading this too.) For ages, some on the Conservative right have looked wistfully at Canada, where a populist party called Reform swallowed the wetter Conservatives whole.

    The catch is that it's not a brilliant tool for winning general elections. If we start the clock in 1993 (Kim Campbell: 2 seats), the Canadian right has been in opposition for 22 years out of 31.
    As happened in France the Republicans there imploded with many of their voters heading towards RN . We haven’t yet got the harder left here and I doubt we will unless there’s a change to our voting system .
    Many, but rarely enough.

    I may be doing motivated reasoning here, but I think that a centre-right party can attract reluctant right wing voters more effectively than a right-wing party can attract reluctant centre-right voters. Combination of different toxicity and availability of alternatives.

    Another data point is 2019: big Conservative win because Reform stood down in Conservative seats.
    I doubt Reform/Brexit would have cost the Conservatives a single MP in 2019 by standing against them.

    Which is why Farage agreed to stand down his candidates.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,885
    What puzzles me about this reset saga is why Labour is still in thrall to the EU since a) it is an increasingly reactionary project and b) it is in serious economic trouble.


    Why does Labour want our laws to be set by the parties of Marine Le Pen, Giorgia Meloni, Geert Wilders or by Alternative for Germany, rather than by our own parliament?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/20/starmers-reset-inflicts-real-harm-on-the-british-economy
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 14,293
    nico67 said:

    Foxy said:

    I see everyone is a critic of the indiscriminate slaughter of Gazans now. I wonder if there will be any reflection on the appeasement, selective silences and bothsidesism that got us to this point?
    (Answers own question: of course there won’t be, you stupid twat)

    I'm not in favour of the indiscriminate slaughter of anyone, anywhere in the world, but - personally - I find Israel/Palestine and Gaza/West Bank stuff boring.

    I only keep quiet because you get abuse if you don't echo along. But I'm not especially interested.
    Yes, I rarely comment on it for the same reason. The Hamas attack and kidnappings were a shocking act of terrorism but the Israeli response is openly genocidal.

    It touches so many culture war issues that it soaks up far too much attention, while Sudan, or the Eastern Congo get ignored.
    The situation in Gaza will always resonate more as it’s easier for the public to pick their side as in good v evil , also it has more impact here in the UK , and we’ve had years and years of constant coverage.

    There will always be those whose support for X or Y is unwavering, but I should think many millions in the west whose instincts have to extend a good deal of latitude to Israel for very good historic and more recent reasons have abandoned that position, replacing it will what might be called hostile and sceptical neutrality towards everyone (including most of the media reporting) except babies and children.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,922
    High inflation on top of everything else is Worst Case Scenario for Labour

    Could see them follow the Tories under 20%?
  • TimSTimS Posts: 15,392

    TimS said:

    Taz said:



    .

    Taz said:

    A very definite yes. It would be a sad day for the U.K. for a party as awful as the Lib Dem’s to do so well. A party of cosy, Home Counties, NIMBYs with no answers to any of the problems the nation faces. Just more of the same and protecting entrenched wealth and privilege

    The new conservatives.

    Morning love! Glad we've got your attention!

    Like Reform you’ll get more now you are rising in the polls and will you survive the scrutiny ?

    You always go,on that Reform have no answers to problems in areas like where I live. Red wall, left behind, etc etc.

    What exactly do the Lib Dem’s offer us ? I cannot see anything. Their offer seems totally skewed towards the Home Counties and the middle,class.

    We’re invisible to them. Yet our council was run by a Lib Dem until recently.
    Lib Dem policy positions include radically more regional and local devolution, planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed, a major overhaul of the social care system and investment in transport infrastructure (including, famously, fixing potholes). Plus some silly populist ideas on international tax which don’t add up but are certainly not designed to attract the Home Counties.

    I know Taz isn’t likely to switch vote to the LDs anytime soon, but I wouldn’t want any floating voters to think the party platform is nimbyism plus Gail’s bakeries on every high street as seems to be the populist right wing stereotype.

    "planning reform that allows for more not less development where it’s needed"

    Strangely, that development is never needed round the neighbourhood of LibDems.

    It's a regular feature that after LibDems have had local power for a while, the voters routinely turf them out, unimpressed.
    The Orkney & Shetland constituency has been LibDem/Liberal since 1950. Sutton council has been LibDem since 1990.
    Whoopeedoo. Hardly gaining then losing Liverpool, Sheffield, Bristol...
    I’d be very interested in seeing:

    - turnover in council control, by party (which is the stickiest, which the most volatile)
    - Resident satisfaction in councils, by party control (LGA stats don’t seem to contain this)

    If you have this data that could be great to see. It sounds like you do.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,625
    DoctorG said:

    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    The UK could end up like Australia, with Labor and the Liberals the two main parties ...
    Only if the Liberals become a right of centre party as the Australian liberals are.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 15,392
    edited May 21
    DavidL said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Taz said:

    Inflation numbers today. Well done Rachel. We expected a spike but to overshoot by 0.2%. Ouch. Here come the public sector demanding large pay rises too.

    Euro area inflation is down to 2.2% in April.

    Rachel's really fucked it
    It's, its almost as if the £18bn she splurged on wage increases for the public sector after the election has bled through into higher prices (with more to come from NI). In fairness, it also boosted consumption somewhat giving 1 month's decent growth.
    We’ve had quite a long recent run of wage increases exceeding inflation, and service sector price rises exceeding goods price rises. It started in the tail end of Sunak’s premiership and has continued.

    It’s the opposite to what’s generally happened since 2020.

    This is good news.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 35,020
    DoctorG said:

    Eabhal said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    With Starmer stupidly chasing the mainly mythical Labour to Reform switcher there’s always a chance they’ll lose even more voters to the Lib Dem’s and with even more Tory to Lib Dem switchers as the Tories implode it’s not as outlandish as might have been the case .

    Unless there is a dramatic change in their fortunes, the LDs are still batting in a relatively narrow range.

    Therefore the bet is essentially one on a (further) Tory collapse, like we saw in the locals. And gambling also that Reform neither collapses into scandal or divison, and that there isn't any deal between Reform and Tory.

    Putting all those together, I'm not yet convinced it's a very safe bet so far ahead of the election.
    This purported Reform <> Tory merger keeps being floated, mainly by desperate Tories hoping to remain relevant. From their perspective I get it - they think they would be in the driving seat. From Reform's perspective? Why merge with the thing you have defeated? They already have the voters the donors, the attention, the members.
    I don't get it from a Conservative perspective. I think it's still at least a 50:50 whether they are bigger than Reform at the next election. A merger makes that a 0% chance. They've got to stick it out to one more GE.
    The UK could end up like Australia, with Labor and the Liberals the two main parties ...
    Reform or Tories will be one of the main parties.
Sign In or Register to comment.