Recent history suggests Badenoch will not make it to the general election – politicalbetting.com
David Cameron really was exceptional, we may not see his like again, since the turn of the millennium other than David Cameron no Tory leader has served more 38 months.
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
On the surface that seems plausible but you and I are old enough to remember the 1981/2 Alliance bubble. In mid-December 1981 MORI produced a poll that had Con 23%, Lab 23.5% and Alliance on 50.5%, a lead of 27%.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
» show previous quotes For Trump to win his trade war, he has to cure America of its desire to buy foreign "stuff".
Whilst making stuff foreigners want to buy.
I said: And he is fundamentally correct that the continuous and massive trade deficits that the US has run with the rest of the world are impoverishing the US. The debt that the US has piled up over the last 30 years means that there is a continuous flow of money from the US to other countries reducing domestic consumption and investment. A lot of this is in bonds but, as with the UK, there is also an increasing number of US businesses being sold to finance this deficit. It is making the US poorer.
What he is fundamentally incorrect about is his batshit "solutions" to the problem. Erratic tariffs and economic policies positively discourage investment in the US. His bizarre behaviour at borders is costing the US tourist market tens of billions. He has failed to comprehend that his policies restrict imports to which manufacturers in the US can add value further damaging production. He has failed to appreciate that the inflationary consequences of his actions makes it harder for the Fed to cut interest rates.
Biden's solutions to the same problem, such as the CHIPs Act, were a breach of GATT rules but the US has destroyed that institution by making the court non quorate by vetoing new appointments. But. right or wrong, those policies positively encouraged investment in manufacturing in the US. They were a far smarter way of addressing what is a real problem for the US.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
» show previous quotes For Trump to win his trade war, he has to cure America of its desire to buy foreign "stuff".
Whilst making stuff foreigners want to buy.
I said: And he is fundamentally correct that the continuous and massive trade deficits that the US has run with the rest of the world are impoverishing the US. The debt that the US has piled up over the last 30 years means that there is a continuous flow of money from the US to other countries reducing domestic consumption and investment. A lot of this is in bonds but, as with the UK, there is also an increasing number of US businesses being sold to finance this deficit. It is making the US poorer.
What he is fundamentally incorrect about is his batshit "solutions" to the problem. Erratic tariffs and economic policies positively discourage investment in the US. His bizarre behaviour at borders is costing the US tourist market tens of billions. He has failed to comprehend that his policies restrict imports to which manufacturers in the US can add value further damaging production. He has failed to appreciate that the inflationary consequences of his actions makes it harder for the Fed to cut interest rates.
Biden's solutions to the same problem, such as the CHIPs Act, were a breach of GATT rules but the US has destroyed that institution by making the court non quorate by vetoing new appointments. But. right or wrong, those policies positively encouraged investment in manufacturing in the US. They were a far smarter way of addressing what is a real problem for the US.
In the latest news Trump has threatened the Mattel Toy company with 100% tariffs, despite being a company based in California, not a country.
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
The very act of changing leader again would be a negative. I can't see that there is anyone who could replace KB and bring sufficient benefit to make it worth it. There are possibilities which would be much worse too.
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
On the surface that seems plausible but you and I are old enough to remember the 1981/2 Alliance bubble. In mid-December 1981 MORI produced a poll that had Con 23%, Lab 23.5% and Alliance on 50.5%, a lead of 27%.
Anything could happen yet.
Anything could happen yet, but one difference this time the Conservatives have completely trashed their brand. In 1981 they were unpopular, but still seen as a serious party.
The Labour government will be judged on results to a large extent. If people feel better off, and feel the country is going in the right direction they've got every chance of being re-elected.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Not to mention the potential incoming strikes from junior doctors et al which labour got praised for ending less than a year ago
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
No Conservative leader has served more than three years (other than Cameron).
But this is a two-edged sword. Whilst it shows Kemi's position is unsafe, it also shows Robert Jenrick would be foolish to challenge now, four years from a 2029 election, because there is clearly time for any new leader to be deposed (even two new leaders!).
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
The fight seems to have gone out of them.
Most members and MPs would probably prefer a Farage led Fukker government to a Badenough led tory government anyway.
Going for Kemi was pure DEI virtue signalling and they are paying the price.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Unless you're betting on his exit, which is admittedly a potentially interesting question, who cares ?
If Labour show progress on the economy and immigration, no one is going to remember an awkward press conference. Most people won't even have noticed it.
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
They need a low tax, sane, business friendly type who knows their job is unlikely to get them into number 10, but solidify their vote in the mid 20s for a time. There was too much self indulgence from Tory MPs in the last parliament for me to believe any of them are up to that job at the moment, I think they all still assume being conservative leader leads to being PM.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Edit second as the Tories still definitely won't be at the next election
Do you really think they will be first !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Could be....long way to go to 2029. By then:
Starmer is then hated. Reeves's memory even more so.
Farage has departed the scene to sell Trumpian crypto. He is now worth $4.6bn. His successors fight like rats in a sack
The LibDems are still meh for a good 80% of the population, trapped in trying to be all things to all men. Davey's jolly japes schtick has by now worn very thin.
Kemi took time to bed in but now looks sane. Sensible. For sure, dull - but the electorate don't hold that against her.
Yet of the recent Conservative leaders who were replaced there was a clear alternative available who either polled better, as when Boris replaced May or looked more prime ministerial and could manage the economy better ie when Rishi replaced Truss.
There is also no polling evidence swapping Kemi with Jenrick for instance would make any difference at all. Indeed it might just end up a repeat of 2003 when the Tories replaced IDS with Howrd, leading to Howard making more of an impact at PMQs and on the media and giving a bit of a morale boost to Tory MPs but in polling terms making no change at all to the 32-34% the Conservatives polled when IDS was ousted and still losing to Blair with a few gains of seats
Edit second as the Tories still definitely won't be at the next election
Do you really think they will be first !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Could be....long way to go to 2029. By then:
Starmer is then hated. Reeves's memory even more so.
Farage has departed the scene to sell Trumpian crypto. He is now worth $4.6bn. His successors fight like rats in a sack
The LibDems are still meh for a good 80% of the population, trapped in trying to be all things to all men. Davey's jolly japes schtick has by now worn very thin.
Kemi took time to bed in but now looks sane. Sensible. For sure, dull - but the electorate don't hold that against her.
Are we doing another fantasy alternative history thread?
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Take a walk on the wild side.
@davidl I sent you a private message a day or so ago.
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
The fight seems to have gone out of them.
Most members and MPs would probably prefer a Farage led Fukker government to a Badenough led tory government anyway.
Going for Kemi was pure DEI virtue signalling and they are paying the price.
It was Kemi or someone who thought spending tax payers money painting over a mural was a good use of tax payers money.
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Take a walk on the wild side.
@davidl I sent you a private message a day or so ago.
Yes, I got it thanks very much. An interesting read.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Take a walk on the wild side.
Is the political world ready for a Melvyn? It's a rather retro name, hardly suggesting a new face for a new era. Melvyn Bragg is still hanging in there at 85 - as is Melvyn Hayes ("It Ain't Half Hot Mum") at 90.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
And for Bozo to win the seat - which isn’t a forgone conclusion even if the seat was safe Tory
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Take a walk on the wild side.
Is the political world ready for a Melvyn? It's a rather retro name, hardly suggesting a new face for a new era. Melvyn Bragg is still hanging in there at 85 - as is Melvyn Hayes ("It Ain't Half Hot Mum") at 90.
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
They need a low tax, sane, business friendly type who knows their job is unlikely to get them into number 10, but solidify their vote in the mid 20s for a time. There was too much self indulgence from Tory MPs in the last parliament for me to believe any of them are up to that job at the moment, I think they all still assume being conservative leader leads to being PM.
Seems to me that the best hope for the Conservatives is a by-election in a safe seat (if such a thing exists now) and a really good new MP to provide a fresh face. New blood. Multiply that by several and hope that they survive the next GE.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Reform rising is definitely remarkable, but then...
Michael Foot was 16% ahead in the polls at this stage in the 1979-1983 Parliament.
Neil Kinnock had a 28 pt lead during the 1987-1992 Parliament.
Ed Miliband was 11% up at this stage in the 2010-2015 Parliament.
Theresa May was 25% up in a poll just 6 weeks before an election she won by 2.5%
Farage's Brexit Party had a 6% poll lead six months before the 2019 General election. By the time they stood down candidates, they were already polling 25-30 pts behind the Tories, and 15-20pts behind Labour, and on election day got just 2% of the vote.
Boris Johnson had an 18pt lead in 2021. In the same Parliament, Starmer had a 30pt poll lead.
There's a reason most parties don't panic at this stage of a Parliament.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Unless you're betting on his exit, which is admittedly a potentially interesting question, who cares ?
If Labour show progress on the economy and immigration, no one is going to remember an awkward press conference. Most people won't even have noticed it.
I remain unconvinced growth even if they managed it is a vote winner. If labour could truthfully say in 2029 GDP has grown 5% this last year the majority of voters will merely be thinking thats all well and good but where is my share of that.
I am always amused when I hear the stats for average wage rises....you would have thought sometime over the last couple of decades I would have met people who got anywhere near the quoted percentage*. This year for example I think of my social circle maybe 20 or so people the highest I heard of was about 2.5%
*the only people that seem to get near the quoted figure are people I know working minimum wage and that is down to being mandatory not voluntary pay rises to retain staff, I do wonder what the average would be if you removed min wage workers and senior management rises from the calculation (senior management because they always seem to achieve riduculously large pay rises.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
Bring back Boris?
It's like chucking a drowning man a concrete life-ring.
Is there a more discredited politician on the planet?
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
Nope. She’s obviously a dead end. You need to stop digging the hole. The deeper it gets the harder recovery will be. A genial caretaker would be an improvement until the replacement emerges.
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
He has nothing to offer. We've done the Boris Show. The ratings were great, then went down the pan. The show got cancelled. Who misses it?
Bori has as much chance of a come back as Rolf Harris.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
And for Bozo to win the seat - which isn’t a forgone conclusion even if the seat was safe Tory
If he takes the Tories to 26% nationally as MiC found Boris would easily hold any of the current Tory held seats
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
They need a low tax, sane, business friendly type who knows their job is unlikely to get them into number 10, but solidify their vote in the mid 20s for a time. There was too much self indulgence from Tory MPs in the last parliament for me to believe any of them are up to that job at the moment, I think they all still assume being conservative leader leads to being PM.
Seems to me that the best hope for the Conservatives is a by-election in a safe seat (if such a thing exists now) and a really good new MP to provide a fresh face. New blood. Multiply that by several and hope that they survive the next GE.
Yes, they are definitely lacking in talent. Many of those who survived last year should have been put out to pasture long ago. It does make building for the future much harder for them.
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
Nope. She’s obviously a dead end. You need to stop digging the hole. The deeper it gets the harder recovery will be. A genial caretaker would be an improvement until the replacement emerges.
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
I expect conservatives are unlikely to be influenced by those who would never vote for them
And as I am not a member of the conservative party I have no say over the leadership
However, as I posted earlier Starmer is becoming more and more a lame duck so maybe Labour supporters need to be considering whether he should be replaced
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Reform rising is definitely remarkable, but then...
Michael Foot was 16% ahead in the polls at this stage in the 1979-1983 Parliament.
Neil Kinnock had a 28 pt lead during the 1987-1992 Parliament.
Ed Miliband was 11% up at this stage in the 2010-2015 Parliament.
Theresa May was 25% up in a poll just 6 weeks before an election she won by 2.5%
Farage's Brexit Party had a 6% poll lead six months before the 2019 General election. By the time they stood down candidates, they were already polling 25-30 pts behind the Tories, and 15-20pts behind Labour, and on election day got just 2% of the vote.
Boris Johnson had an 18pt lead in 2021. In the same Parliament, Starmer had a 30pt poll lead.
There's a reason most parties don't panic at this stage of a Parliament.
Yet that’s exactly what many Labour MPs are doing.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
Boris is not coming back
If he is the only way for the Conservatives to beat Labour and Reform he remains a contender
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
Boris is not coming back
If he is the only way for the Conservatives to beat Labour and Reform he remains a contender
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Take a walk on the wild side.
It's not quite Stride imo, but it's not too far off.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
Bring back Boris?
It's like chucking a drowning man a concrete life-ring.
Is there a more discredited politician on the planet?
(Well, Truss obviously, but anyone else?)
The likes of you said exactly the same in 2019 when Boris won a landslide victory, left liberal Remainers who would never vote Conservative after Brexit let alone Reform still hate Boris but they aren't the voters the Conservatives have lost since 2019 and 2024. Instead the Conservatives have mainly been losing voters to Reform and all of those voters voted for Boris in 2019
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
Nope. She’s obviously a dead end. You need to stop digging the hole. The deeper it gets the harder recovery will be. A genial caretaker would be an improvement until the replacement emerges.
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
I expect conservatives are unlikely to be influenced by those who would never vote for them
And as I am not a member of the conservative party I have no say over the leadership
However, as I posted earlier Starmer is becoming more and more a lame duck so maybe Labour supporters need to be considering whether he should be replaced
Oh well. Go all in on Badenoch. Bet the house on her. Maybe she completely changes her personality and becomes a vote magnet. Good luck with that.
As the Starmer, his opponents keep saying this stuff and somehow he keeps defeating them. Definitely an enigma though.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
Nope. She’s obviously a dead end. You need to stop digging the hole. The deeper it gets the harder recovery will be. A genial caretaker would be an improvement until the replacement emerges.
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
I expect conservatives are unlikely to be influenced by those who would never vote for them
And as I am not a member of the conservative party I have no say over the leadership
However, as I posted earlier Starmer is becoming more and more a lame duck so maybe Labour supporters need to be considering whether he should be replaced
More difficult for Labour as Labour MPs can't no confidence a leader like Tory MPs, instead they can only nominate a challenger with the leadership election then going straight to party members.
In which case Rayner would be favourite or Burnham if like Boris he could be found a seat first
Edit second as the Tories still definitely won't be at the next election
Do you really think they will be first !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Could be....long way to go to 2029. By then:
Starmer is then hated. Reeves's memory even more so.
Farage has departed the scene to sell Trumpian crypto. He is now worth $4.6bn. His successors fight like rats in a sack
The LibDems are still meh for a good 80% of the population, trapped in trying to be all things to all men. Davey's jolly japes schtick has by now worn very thin.
Kemi took time to bed in but now looks sane. Sensible. For sure, dull - but the electorate don't hold that against her.
...and then you woke up..*
* If that does play out (unlikely) Jenrick is cr@p is Prime Minister.
Ishaq Dar also said he had told the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, that the ball was in India’s court when it came to de-escalation.
Rubio said both parties had to find ways to de-escalate and re-establish direct communication to avoid miscalculation, the US state department said.
The Indian military, meanwhile, reiterated a commitment not to escalate the conflict provided that was reciprocated by the Pakistani military...
I believe India has had a bit of a short, sharp shock at how poorly prepared its forces were/how well prepared Pakistan's were. Earlier, India suffered a cyber attack that hit 70% of its electricity generating capacity.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
Nope. She’s obviously a dead end. You need to stop digging the hole. The deeper it gets the harder recovery will be. A genial caretaker would be an improvement until the replacement emerges.
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
I expect conservatives are unlikely to be influenced by those who would never vote for them
And as I am not a member of the conservative party I have no say over the leadership
However, as I posted earlier Starmer is becoming more and more a lame duck so maybe Labour supporters need to be considering whether he should be replaced
Starmer is irritating but he's far from a lame duck. He's bright and learning on the job and whenever the next election comes he'll be the one to beat.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Reform rising is definitely remarkable, but then...
Michael Foot was 16% ahead in the polls at this stage in the 1979-1983 Parliament.
Neil Kinnock had a 28 pt lead during the 1987-1992 Parliament.
Ed Miliband was 11% up at this stage in the 2010-2015 Parliament.
Theresa May was 25% up in a poll just 6 weeks before an election she won by 2.5%
Farage's Brexit Party had a 6% poll lead six months before the 2019 General election. By the time they stood down candidates, they were already polling 25-30 pts behind the Tories, and 15-20pts behind Labour, and on election day got just 2% of the vote.
Boris Johnson had an 18pt lead in 2021. In the same Parliament, Starmer had a 30pt poll lead.
There's a reason most parties don't panic at this stage of a Parliament.
Yet that’s exactly what many Labour MPs are doing.
I don't think they are panicking - they are using the election results to attack policies they and their constituents don't like such as the WFA cut.
Which I will continually emphasis was so badly presented I'm not surprised its created problems...
I am not convinced though am ambivalent towards her
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi then who ?
And why.
Where is the Tory Prince or Princess who is going to recreate either Cameron's coalition or Boris's army to sweep the Tories back into power? Where are the vision or the ideas that are going to get them another hearing? What is their analysis of what is wrong with the country (which is operating exactly the same way as it did under Boris, Truss or Sunak)?
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
They need a low tax, sane, business friendly type who knows their job is unlikely to get them into number 10, but solidify their vote in the mid 20s for a time. There was too much self indulgence from Tory MPs in the last parliament for me to believe any of them are up to that job at the moment, I think they all still assume being conservative leader leads to being PM.
Seems to me that the best hope for the Conservatives is a by-election in a safe seat (if such a thing exists now) and a really good new MP to provide a fresh face. New blood. Multiply that by several and hope that they survive the next GE.
Yes, they are definitely lacking in talent. Many of those who survived last year should have been put out to pasture long ago. It does make building for the future much harder for them.
There are some talented Tories. Both Alicia Kearns (Rutland and Stamford) and Neil O'Brien (Harborough) are sane, and can speak in whole sentences. There must be others in the country too.
Pretty much everyone on the Oposition Front Bench is a waste of space, Badenoch has a poor hand and is playing it badly.
Edit second as the Tories still definitely won't be at the next election
Do you really think they will be first !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Could be....long way to go to 2029. By then:
Starmer is then hated. Reeves's memory even more so.
Farage has departed the scene to sell Trumpian crypto. He is now worth $4.6bn. His successors fight like rats in a sack
The LibDems are still meh for a good 80% of the population, trapped in trying to be all things to all men. Davey's jolly japes schtick has by now worn very thin.
Kemi took time to bed in but now looks sane. Sensible. For sure, dull - but the electorate don't hold that against her.
Are we doing another fantasy alternative history thread?
Ooh, I like them!
The Callaghan winning in 1978 thread was awesome. The Tories winning in 2029 (at this moment in time) appears equally implausible.
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
And this is the man you suggest would improve your party’s fortunes…?
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
Boris is not coming back
If he is the only way for the Conservatives to beat Labour and Reform he remains a contender
That follows the pattern that English cricket used to use when going through a lack of talent phase when I was young. 'Bring back X' where X was a hero of yesteryear.
Maybe they still do, it's decades since I followed cricket.
At the time of the last leadership election Priti was the only one of the 6 Tory leadership candidates with worse negative ratings than Kemi, so she could even if she has more oomph
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
Then Boris has to be recalled
You think at that point it would make a difference ?
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
Remember the Yes, Prime Minister four stage plan:
In stage one we say nothing is going to happen. Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it. In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do. Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.
I reckon the Conservatives are currently at stage two (if they are Reform-curious) or three (if they are wets).
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Reform rising is definitely remarkable, but then...
Michael Foot was 16% ahead in the polls at this stage in the 1979-1983 Parliament.
Neil Kinnock had a 28 pt lead during the 1987-1992 Parliament.
Ed Miliband was 11% up at this stage in the 2010-2015 Parliament.
Theresa May was 25% up in a poll just 6 weeks before an election she won by 2.5%
Farage's Brexit Party had a 6% poll lead six months before the 2019 General election. By the time they stood down candidates, they were already polling 25-30 pts behind the Tories, and 15-20pts behind Labour, and on election day got just 2% of the vote.
Boris Johnson had an 18pt lead in 2021. In the same Parliament, Starmer had a 30pt poll lead.
There's a reason most parties don't panic at this stage of a Parliament.
Yet that’s exactly what many Labour MPs are doing.
Is it the many, or the few that are actually panicking? I'd say there were grumbles, which isn't a surprise, when you've got 400+ MPs, and things aren't going well.
I had a quick look to see if anyone had suggested Starmer step down, and found one 'veiled' comment from Jon Trickett, who, as a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, isn't going to be Starmer's biggest fan.
What's the difference between a pessimist and an optimist? -A pessimist is he who says: "It just can't get any worse!" -Whereas an optimist says: "Come on, of course it can!"
If Badenoch was only half as good as she thinks she is, the Tories would be fine.
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
Surely even you can see that changing yet another leader who has only been in post a few months and with no clear alternative is just unrealistic and furthermore she cannot be replaced before November
Nope. She’s obviously a dead end. You need to stop digging the hole. The deeper it gets the harder recovery will be. A genial caretaker would be an improvement until the replacement emerges.
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
I have missed Jonathan's solemnly delivered strategical advice for the Tories, and this is a classic of the genre. Have you considered offering your services to CCHQ?
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
Then Boris has to be recalled
Does Boris Johnson have it in him to steer a party in opposition through adversity? He was popular for a while but I doubt if that can be reignited.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
Then Boris has to be recalled
Does Boris Johnson have it in him to steer a party in opposition through adversity? He was popular for a while but I doubt if that can be reignited.
Being in opposition doesn't require any real hard work or responsibility, as long as you have charisma like Boris does all you need to do is say how crap the government is doing all day and make an impact at PMQs as Boris would.
Boris is also the only Conservative who can reach the redwall voters who voted for him in 2019, for Labour in 2024 and have now gone Reform
Maybe it is not just Kemi Badenoch leadership under threat, what about Starmer ?
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trunp from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
It's to do with the mechanism of leadership challenges. It's virtually impossible to challenge a sitting Labour leader.
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
Rules, schmules, though. Breaking rules when it is advantageous is the Conservative way.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
Only because they voluntarily stood down, Badenoch doesn't seem to have the same self awareness.
Less self-awareness than Boris and Liz? I'm not saying you are wrong, but blimey.
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
No, as More in Common found Boris is the only alternative leader to Kemi who would see the Conservatives take the lead against Reform again but even then Reform would still be on 23% to a Johnson led Tories 26% and so Boris would still have to do a deal with Farage to become PM in a hung parliament.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
First of all it needs Boris to want it, and he declared he has no interest in returning earlier this week
Yes because Boris always says the truth and what he means...
Boris is not coming back
If he is the only way for the Conservatives to beat Labour and Reform he remains a contender
That follows the pattern that English cricket used to use when going through a lack of talent phase when I was young. 'Bring back X' where X was a hero of yesteryear.
Maybe they still do, it's decades since I followed cricket.
Huw Morris would be a far better choice to open than Zak Crawley.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
Then Boris has to be recalled
You think at that point it would make a difference ?
Yup, More in Common has a Boris led Conservatives on 26%, with Reform on 23% and Labour on 22% and the LDs 15%.
Indeed at this point Boris may be the only chance not only to save Tory seats but also to stop Farage becoming PM assuming we don't get PR before the next general election and even then Farage could become PM if Reform win most votes and Reform and the Tories combined reached 50% or more as they did with BMG yesterday https://www.moreincommon.org.uk/media/2cyg5l1m/more-in-common-post-election-briefing-4.pdf (p48)
What's the difference between a pessimist and an optimist? -A pessimist is he who says: "It just can't get any worse!" -Whereas an optimist says: "Come on, of course it can!"
Or Enver Hoxha in his 1967 New Year address to the nation:
“This year will be harder than last year. On the other hand, it will be easier than next year.”
Boris would surely improve the Tory performance - he's a vote winner. The problem comes after - he lacks the ability and the purpose to govern .
The problem with these hypothetical polls is that Nigel Farage will remind voters about the Boriswave immigration and the Tories will be back down polling in the teens.
I am sure the Red Wall will vote for the guy that delivered record breaking immigration.
Boris would surely improve the Tory performance - he's a vote winner. The problem comes after - he lacks the ability and the purpose to govern .
The problem with these hypothetical polls is that Nigel Farage will remind voters about the Boriswave immigration and the Tories will be back down polling in the teens.
I am sure the Red Wall will vote for the guy that delivered record breaking immigration.
Well, they have voted for Nigel Farage despite his fairly key role in it.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Stride would at least likely hold the 24% who voted for Rishi at the last GE, Kemi isn't doing even that, the latest polls have the Tories on 20-21% on average and in some post local election polls even under 20%.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
That's certainly the easy do nothing and hope something turns up option. But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
Then Boris has to be recalled
You think at that point it would make a difference ?
It would make things worse, a visible reminder of why and how the party has trashed itself in the first place.
What might save Kemi B is a sense that things are so hopeless/Farage will win doing the things we would like to do that there's no perceived point in changing leader. As Sam Freedman put it last week,
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
Time to provide…the S T R I D E
Take a walk on the wild side.
Plucked her eyebrows along the way Shaved her legs and then he was a she?
What's the difference between a pessimist and an optimist? -A pessimist is he who says: "It just can't get any worse!" -Whereas an optimist says: "Come on, of course it can!"
Or Enver Hoxha in his 1967 New Year address to the nation:
“This year will be harder than last year. On the other hand, it will be easier than next year.”
I suppose he counts as a Soviet joke as well.
I for some reason was incredibly disappointed , and no idea why it was such a disappointment, when I discovered that Enver Hoxha didn't actually have a pet flounder called Tristan
Ishaq Dar also said he had told the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, that the ball was in India’s court when it came to de-escalation.
Rubio said both parties had to find ways to de-escalate and re-establish direct communication to avoid miscalculation, the US state department said.
The Indian military, meanwhile, reiterated a commitment not to escalate the conflict provided that was reciprocated by the Pakistani military...
I believe India has had a bit of a short, sharp shock at how poorly prepared its forces were/how well prepared Pakistan's were. Earlier, India suffered a cyber attack that hit 70% of its electricity generating capacity.
Just as Ukraine provided a surprise about just how poor most Russian kit is, Pakistan has demonstrated the opposite about Chinese weapons.
Comments
The problem for the conservatives is if not Kemi than who ?
Anything could happen yet.
I posted this at the end of the last thread
The rise of Reform in the polls is remarkable and shows no signs of abating
Switching on the news this morning Starmer is in Ukraine with other EU leaders and Zelensky posing for photos, and I am beginning to come to the conclusion no matter for all Starmer's efforts with the US and India he has lost the dressing room in football parlance
The question for Labour if the polls do not improve will be is Starmer the problem, as he certainly does not have any personality nor political nous
His press conference with Trump from the car factory was toe curling with his Donald and Keir familiarity and it may be reaching the point nothing he says or does improves Labour's polling
Indeed with the huge NHS cuts muted and the immigration debate not helping what can save him if Labour want to win in 2028/9 ?
Plus, the fight has just gone out of a lot of them. They seem resigned rather than eager to plot yet another leadership change, which is perhaps the most worrying sign of all for them. Tories not wanting to plot is like a usually vivacious child lying listless on the sofa.
Besides, even if one takes the optimistic spin that it's only as bad as IDS (it's not- it's far worse), who is the Michael Howard figure? Who is broadly tolerated enough to give the sinking ship a bit of buoyancy?
It wouldn't surprise me if Starmer stood down voluntarily in 2028, but it's virtually impossible to force him out.
The Tory party rules have tightened too, so not easy to unseat Badenoch, and I think that the maths means that she can't be unseated this year. Badenoch going in 2025 is a definite lay.
MarqueeMark said:
» show previous quotes
For Trump to win his trade war, he has to cure America of its desire to buy foreign "stuff".
Whilst making stuff foreigners want to buy.
I said:
And he is fundamentally correct that the continuous and massive trade deficits that the US has run with the rest of the world are impoverishing the US. The debt that the US has piled up over the last 30 years means that there is a continuous flow of money from the US to other countries reducing domestic consumption and investment. A lot of this is in bonds but, as with the UK, there is also an increasing number of US businesses being sold to finance this deficit. It is making the US poorer.
What he is fundamentally incorrect about is his batshit "solutions" to the problem. Erratic tariffs and economic policies positively discourage investment in the US. His bizarre behaviour at borders is costing the US tourist market tens of billions. He has failed to comprehend that his policies restrict imports to which manufacturers in the US can add value further damaging production. He has failed to appreciate that the inflationary consequences of his actions makes it harder for the Fed to cut interest rates.
Biden's solutions to the same problem, such as the CHIPs Act, were a breach of GATT rules but the US has destroyed that institution by making the court non quorate by vetoing new appointments. But. right or wrong, those policies positively encouraged investment in manufacturing in the US. They were a far smarter way of addressing what is a real problem for the US.
The rules didn't save Truss, Johnson or May.
ETA tbh Wikipedia did most of the heavy lifting.
https://bsky.app/profile/mollyploofkins.bsky.social/post/3loqm2e6fpk2q
It seems that he thought the Barbie Movie was a traveller documentary.
The Labour government will be judged on results to a large extent. If people feel better off, and feel the country is going in the right direction they've got every chance of being re-elected.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/may/02/resident-doctors-in-england-to-be-balloted-on-strike-action-over-pay
They are being awfully quiet if they exist. Until they work out what they want and why changing leaders has as much effect as changing the managers at OT.
But this is a two-edged sword. Whilst it shows Kemi's position is unsafe, it also shows Robert Jenrick would be foolish to challenge now, four years from a 2029 election, because there is clearly time for any new leader to be deposed (even two new leaders!).
In practice, though it doesn't matter. The only sitting MP who could make a material difference to Conservative fortunes by becoming leader is N. Farage Esq.
Most members and MPs would probably prefer a Farage led Fukker government to a Badenough led tory government anyway.
Going for Kemi was pure DEI virtue signalling and they are paying the price.
If Labour show progress on the economy and immigration, no one is going to remember an awkward press conference. Most people won't even have noticed it.
Starmer is then hated. Reeves's memory even more so.
Farage has departed the scene to sell Trumpian crypto. He is now worth $4.6bn. His successors fight like rats in a sack
The LibDems are still meh for a good 80% of the population, trapped in trying to be all things to all men. Davey's jolly japes schtick has by now worn very thin.
Kemi took time to bed in but now looks sane. Sensible. For sure, dull - but the electorate don't hold that against her.
There is also no polling evidence swapping Kemi with Jenrick for instance would make any difference at all. Indeed it might just end up a repeat of 2003 when the Tories replaced IDS with Howrd, leading to Howard making more of an impact at PMQs and on the media and giving a bit of a morale boost to Tory MPs but in polling terms making no change at all to the 32-34% the Conservatives polled when IDS was ousted and still losing to Blair with a few gains of seats
F1: Can Anyone Stop Piastri?
https://medium.com/@rkilner/can-anyone-stop-piastri-731b962f92d8
Free to read wibble for anyone into that sort of thing.
https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/russia-trump-his-administration-s-ties
And that was the least of Jenrick’s problems
But she’s not.
As it stands, overconfidence blinds her to her own weakness. Her inability to warm to people her cause (nobody likes a smart arse) is leading the Tories to the grave.
Why the Tories don’t act is beyond me.
It would also require Boris to be found a seat with a supporter standing down allowing a by election
Is this another example of his lack of political nous or a signal he is losing faith in the bill ?
Michael Foot was 16% ahead in the polls at this stage in the 1979-1983 Parliament.
Neil Kinnock had a 28 pt lead during the 1987-1992 Parliament.
Ed Miliband was 11% up at this stage in the 2010-2015 Parliament.
Theresa May was 25% up in a poll just 6 weeks before an election she won by 2.5%
Farage's Brexit Party had a 6% poll lead six months before the 2019 General election. By the time they stood down candidates, they were already polling 25-30 pts behind the Tories, and 15-20pts behind Labour, and on election day got just 2% of the vote.
Boris Johnson had an 18pt lead in 2021. In the same Parliament, Starmer had a 30pt poll lead.
There's a reason most parties don't panic at this stage of a Parliament.
I am always amused when I hear the stats for average wage rises....you would have thought sometime over the last couple of decades I would have met people who got anywhere near the quoted percentage*. This year for example I think of my social circle maybe 20 or so people the highest I heard of was about 2.5%
*the only people that seem to get near the quoted figure are people I know working minimum wage and that is down to being mandatory not voluntary pay rises to retain staff, I do wonder what the average would be if you removed min wage workers and senior management rises from the calculation (senior management because they always seem to achieve riduculously large pay rises.
I suspect she will be given a year or 2 to turn things round but if that doesn't change and a number of Tory MPs fear losing their seats they will act and probably put Stride or Jenrick in by coronation
It's like chucking a drowning man a concrete life-ring.
Is there a more discredited politician on the planet?
(Well, Truss obviously, but anyone else?)
Like Truss, she can be encouraged to resign. Send in the men in grey suits. You have less time than you think.
Bori has as much chance of a come back as Rolf Harris.
Take a walk on the mild side
And as I am not a member of the conservative party I have no say over the leadership
However, as I posted earlier Starmer is becoming more and more a lame duck so maybe Labour supporters need to be considering whether he should be replaced
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/may/10/pakistan-says-three-air-bases-attacked-by-indian-missiles-live-updates
...Pakistan’s foreign minister has told local television that if India stops here then “we will consider to stop here”, Reuters is reporting.
Ishaq Dar also said he had told the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, that the ball was in India’s court when it came to de-escalation.
Rubio said both parties had to find ways to de-escalate and re-establish direct communication to avoid miscalculation, the US state department said.
The Indian military, meanwhile, reiterated a commitment not to escalate the conflict provided that was reciprocated by the Pakistani military...
Walk on the Wild Side by piano (a bit distant
https://youtu.be/n2JvXwcr2Mo?t=103
Stride
https://youtu.be/zdHZ-RkF4L0?t=47
(Good morning everyone)
As the Starmer, his opponents keep saying this stuff and somehow he keeps defeating them. Definitely an enigma though.
But what if they're polling 12% by then ?
In which case Rayner would be favourite or Burnham if like Boris he could be found a seat first
* If that does play out (unlikely) Jenrick is cr@p is Prime Minister.
Which I will continually emphasis was so badly presented I'm not surprised its created problems...
Pretty much everyone on the Oposition Front Bench is a waste of space, Badenoch has a poor hand and is playing it badly.
The Callaghan winning in 1978 thread was awesome. The Tories winning in 2029 (at this moment in time) appears equally implausible.
#Priti4Leader
She couldn't be any worse than Kemi.
Maybe they still do, it's decades since I followed cricket.
In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.
I reckon the Conservatives are currently at stage two (if they are Reform-curious) or three (if they are wets).
I had a quick look to see if anyone had suggested Starmer step down, and found one 'veiled' comment from Jon Trickett, who, as a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, isn't going to be Starmer's biggest fan.
*Soviet joke from 1976:
What's the difference between a pessimist and an optimist?
-A pessimist is he who says: "It just can't get any worse!"
-Whereas an optimist says: "Come on, of course it can!"
Boris is also the only Conservative who can reach the redwall voters who voted for him in 2019, for Labour in 2024 and have now gone Reform
Indeed at this point Boris may be the only chance not only to save Tory seats but also to stop Farage becoming PM assuming we don't get PR before the next general election and even then Farage could become PM if Reform win most votes and Reform and the Tories combined reached 50% or more as they did with BMG yesterday
https://www.moreincommon.org.uk/media/2cyg5l1m/more-in-common-post-election-briefing-4.pdf (p48)
“This year will be harder than last year. On the other hand, it will be easier than next year.”
I suppose he counts as a Soviet joke as well.
I am sure the Red Wall will vote for the guy that delivered record breaking immigration.
Shaved her legs and then he was a she?
Tories in trans-ition?
If Boris Johnson is the answer (and to a number of you on here that seems to be the case) what question are you asking?