The Tory irrelevance continues – politicalbetting.com
I have said for a while that the biggest threat for the Tories is that the narrative for the next election is a fight between Labour and Reform, this polling reinforces that.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
UKTV industry apparently in crisis, although from the article it is the Beeb and itv.
The solution to this non problem is, of course, more money from taxpayers rather than finding new streams of income, nice timing too given the current debate on future funding of the BBC.
The BBC seems to favour a sliding scale with wealthier homes paying more than less well off homes.
It’s time to get rid of the license fee, fund the network from general taxation, and let the BBC seek its funding in the open market.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
One thing a dictator could do is not just pressure companies to remove accounts belonging to opposition figures, but opposition figures could find that their Internet access methods (wired, wireless etc) oddly get turned off for no reason.
They can work around it, but the authorities can work around the work arounds.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
Reform and Tories merging/making a pact/forming a coalition seems a big threat to Labour to me.
But also a big threat to the Conservatives too. The voters are not interchangeable and a fair number of each loathe the other party.
That's always the case with coalitions or mergers.
Some work nonetheless, like the Liberal Unionist-Conservative coalition a century ago. Some don't for that reason.
Political alliances are much more likely to work when they are seen as a permanent merger, rather than a temporary electoral expedient, when they coalesce around a charismatic leader, and when the non-coalition party keeps shooting itself in the foot.
I'd say Starmer and Reeves are doing their best to help with the latter, but the other two are still some way off.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
Historically the best outcome for the USA is one side controls the house the other other senate.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
That would rely on some GOP politicians growing a spine . Musk has threatened to primary anyone that doesn’t adhere to the new autocracy and there is the threat of violence against anyone who steps out of line by the Maga cult .
Unfortunately only an economic crash in the USA and subsequent voter punishment which is so great even the GOP attempts to steal the mid terms don’t succeed can change the trajectory. That also means we’ll have to suffer the economic effects here as well.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
He has so radically changed his viewpoint over the last decade, than I think he is either: *) Utterly trolling us. *) Not the same WilliamGlenn, and instead a hijacked account.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
That would rely on some GOP politicians growing a spine . Musk has threatened to primary anyone that doesn’t adhere to the new autocracy and there is the threat of violence against anyone who steps out of line by the Maga cult .
Unfortunately only an economic crash in the USA and subsequent voter punishment which is so great even the GOP attempts to steal the mid terms don’t succeed can change the trajectory. That also means we’ll have to suffer the economic effects here as well.
I understand that, normally, being a member of Congress comes with a deal of prestige so the threat of losing it is real.
But would you really want to be a supine dog in order to preserve the ability to continue being a supine dog… surely better to go down in a blaze of glory?
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
He has so radically changed his viewpoint over the last decade, than I think he is either: *) Utterly trolling us. *) Not the same WilliamGlenn, and instead a hijacked account.
Although the sophisticated Russian trolls like to an extreme but rational position on controversial topics - their aim is to forment discord rather than be consistent
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
Because the law is very different in America. In America departments are established by Congress, and departmental heads are confirmed by the Senate. In the UK Secretaries of State are appointed by the Monarch on the advice of the PM from members of the Privy Council. Incidentally, that only applies to Secretaries of State. Other ministries can't be abolished or merged at the whim of the PM, as Tony Blair found when he tried to abolish the role of Lord Chancellor, which was (annd still is) established by statute.
In any case, that was not your question. And as has been pointed out, a very considerable amounts of what Trump is doing in America would be illegal in this country, and since the PM does not have immunity from prosecution would likely lead to a prison sentence if somebody tried them here.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
It’s normal to tackle someone in rugby, but it’s a foul in football. You play by the rules of the game. That’s how democracy works. The rule of law is perhaps the most basic conservative ideal.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
It’s normal to tackle someone in rugby, but it’s a foul in football. You play by the rules of the game. That’s how democracy works. The rule of law is perhaps the most basic conservative ideal.
Not for Massive Johnson.
I'll leave it up to you whether I'm referring to Boris or Mike.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
The cabinet not being appointed by the King?
Revoking security clearances for predecessors and former ministers would be another - although it can be done (Profumo lost his over the Profumo Affair) it's very rare and a process has to be followed.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
It’s normal to tackle someone in rugby, but it’s a foul in football. You play by the rules of the game. That’s how democracy works. The rule of law is perhaps the most basic conservative ideal.
The desire to change the system rather than just operate within it is also quite a normal democratic aspiration.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
He has so radically changed his viewpoint over the last decade, than I think he is either: *) Utterly trolling us. *) Not the same WilliamGlenn, and instead a hijacked account.
No, @williamglenn was a Trumpite a decade ago too, while simultaneously making Steve Bray look lukewarm over Europe.
He is a proper Tankie, and enthusiastically adopts the new position when the party line changes. We have always been at war with EastAsia.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
Because the law is very different in America. In America departments are established by Congress, and departmental heads are confirmed by the Senate. In the UK Secretaries of State are appointed by the Monarch on the advice of the PM from members of the Privy Council. Incidentally, that only applies to Secretaries of State. Other ministries can't be abolished or merged at the whim of the PM, as Tony Blair found when he tried to abolish the role of Lord Chancellor, which was (annd still is) established by statute.
In any case, that was not your question. And as has been pointed out, a very considerable amounts of what Trump is doing in America would be illegal in this country, and since the PM does not have immunity from prosecution would likely lead to a prison sentence if somebody tried them here.
If a British PM had attempted what Trump did in 2020 he would already have been in prison for sometime. And his mob wouldn’t have been pardoned.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
You posted
"Posted from a country that has a "Brandmauer" that means 20% of voters get ignored in the name of democracy."
You apparently haven't noticed that in pretty much every democracy a big chunk of voters have their choice 'ignored' after every election.
It would actually be less democratic if parties that gave absolute guarantees before an election not to work with the AfD, then junked those guarantees after the election.
Of course it's entirely up to the Americans if they want to give the president those powers (maybe there are good reasons not to, I don't know). US courts seem to be saying that some of the things Trump is doing are illegal, so the Republicans would, I assume, have to get legislation through Congress to give Trump these powers. Or ignore the courts and declare a dictatorship.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
It’s normal to tackle someone in rugby, but it’s a foul in football. You play by the rules of the game. That’s how democracy works. The rule of law is perhaps the most basic conservative ideal.
The desire to change the system rather than just operate within it is also quite a normal democratic aspiration.
Yes, and the system allows for change, but you have to make the changes through agreed mechanisms. One side, or one person, can’t just decree the changes made.
Trump can desire to change the system all he wants. He can’t decree it has changed as if he were a king.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
I didn't say that Germany wasn't a democracy but that the "Brandmauer" means that a large number of voters get ignored in the name of democracy. It's a criticism of the other parties.
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
You posted
"Posted from a country that has a "Brandmauer" that means 20% of voters get ignored in the name of democracy."
You apparently haven't noticed that in pretty much every democracy a big chunk of voters have their choice 'ignored' after every election.
It would actually be less democratic if parties that gave absolute guarantees before an election not to work with the AfD, then junked those guarantees after the election.
Of course it's entirely up to the Americans if they want to give the president those powers (maybe there are good reasons not to, I don't know). US courts seem to be saying that some of the things Trump is doing are illegal, so the Republicans would, I assume, have to get legislation through Congress to give Trump these powers. Or ignore the courts and declare a dictatorship.
What's normal in Britain isn't relevant at all.
I’m enjoying this new definition of democracy that guarantees power-sharing with a specific minority party.
I think we should extend it to Britain. Abolish the brandmauer that both Labour and Conservatives erect to deny the SNP their rightful seats in Cabinet.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
Possible. Also possible that defections happen too - perhaps the likelier route. Bear in mind for the special elections, if he is still onside with Trump (not a given), Musk can put millions into advertising. We are seeeing this already in Wisconsin.
It's going to come down to whether the voters are real 'ornery and in a mood to punish MAGA by then. Fair chance of that. If the scales start to fall from their eyes, they will see just how much they have been Trump's useful idiots.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
Witkoff, the guy leading US negotiations praises Trump, and can't name the 5 Ukrainian oblasts Russia is claiming. Can't be bothered with basic facts and likes a brutal dictator and war criminal. This is the Trump administration.
"I don't regard Putin as a bad guy," he said. "He's super smart."
Witkoff, who met Putin ten days ago, said the Russian president had been "gracious" and "straight up" with him. Putin told him, he added, that he had prayed for Trump after an assassination attempt against him last year. He also said Putin had commissioned a portrait of the US president as a gift and Trump was "clearly touched by it". ... He said: "The largest issue in that conflict are these so-called four regions, Donbas, Crimea, you know the names and there are two others."
I was just going to link to that, and praise the BBC for calling out bullshit.
"Witkoff made several assertions that are either not true or disputed:
He said Ukrainian troops in Kursk were surrounded, something denied by Ukraine's government and uncorroborated by any open-source data
He said the four partially occupied regions of Ukraine had held "referendums where the overwhelming majority of the people have indicated that they want to be under Russian rule". There were referendums only in some of the occupied parts of Ukraine at different times and the methodology and results were widely discredited and disputed
He said the four partially occupied oblasts were Russian-speaking. There are many Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine but this has never indicated support for Russia."
The article is good but the headline is absurdly:
Trump envoy dismisses Starmer plan for Ukraine
It's actually worse than the BBC article, which misses some details
Putin “told me a story ... about how when the president was shot, he went to his local church and met with his priest and prayed for the president,” Witkoff said. Putin did it “not because ... he could become the president of the United States, but because he had a friendship with him, and he was praying for his friend.”
Is this guy a fucking moron, or does he think that other people are stupid enough to buy this shit?
I've just been catching up with Mr Witkoff. Hmmm.
I'd say he comes across as a standard Trump appointee. He is perceived as successful in one of the small number of narrow fields that Trump thinks he knows ("Real Estate"), and is therefore assumed to be some kind of Universal Expert.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
AOC v JD Vance would be one hell of an election...
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
You must lead a very sheltered life if you count that mild stuff as foul mouthed.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
Being a woman, she may have some common sense Taz.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
Wait until you start reading Leon's posts.
People read Leon's posts?
They can be quite entertaining. Just avoid any containing the word "noom" - they are guaranteed to be tedious beyond what any human soul can bear.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
AOC v JD Vance would be one hell of an election...
Hell being the kind of place where voters would be faced with that choice. I mean, you would have to go AOC in that situation, but a lot of voters would really struggle with it.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
I'm no fan at all of AOC but she couldn't possibly be as bad as this one. Even if she can be just as arrogant she is at least possessed of a functioning brain.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
Her unwavering support for Senile Joe:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reaffirmed her commitment to President Joe Biden as the presumptive Democratic nominee on Monday evening amid heightened tensions within the party over his mental fitness.
“Joe Biden is our nominee, he is not leaving this race, he is in this race and I support him,” Ocasio-Cortez told a group of reporters outside of the Capitol.
The New York rep’s assertion comes as Democratic lawmakers scramble to find consensus on whether or not to support Biden, 81, as the presidential nominee.
At least six House Democrats have publicly called for the president to withdraw from the race following his disappointing and concerning debate performance at the end of June. The president’s failure to confidently debate his political opponent has led to concerns that he is not well enough to run a campaign or defeat Donald Trump.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
And yet you seem obsessed with fairly foul mouthed rants instead of argument. This just demeans the site I'm afraid .
Wait until you start reading Leon's posts.
People read Leon's posts?
They can be quite entertaining. Just avoid any containing the word "noom" - they are guaranteed to be tedious beyond what any human soul can bear.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
Her unwavering support for Senile Joe:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reaffirmed her commitment to President Joe Biden as the presumptive Democratic nominee on Monday evening amid heightened tensions within the party over his mental fitness.
“Joe Biden is our nominee, he is not leaving this race, he is in this race and I support him,” Ocasio-Cortez told a group of reporters outside of the Capitol.
The New York rep’s assertion comes as Democratic lawmakers scramble to find consensus on whether or not to support Biden, 81, as the presidential nominee.
At least six House Democrats have publicly called for the president to withdraw from the race following his disappointing and concerning debate performance at the end of June. The president’s failure to confidently debate his political opponent has led to concerns that he is not well enough to run a campaign or defeat Donald Trump.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
My periodic check: are we agreed the USA is becoming a dictatorship yet, or is the - um -jury still out?
Yes, it is so becoming; that is the intention. The jury is not still out. The jury is still out about outcomes. Remaining questions include:
Is the intention a continuing 'elected' dictatorship or a rigged/non elected one?
Will the SCOTUS intervene decisively, and if so will their judgment be enforced?
Will there be an enforced clamp down on the jurisdiction of the courts?
Will the, fairly wide, degree of free speech (under intimidation) and free media be allowed to continue?
Will there be a 'Reichstag Fire' event?
Will there be a counter-coup?
(So far this is all at the very worst end of my expectations).
Is the Trump administration doing anything that would be unconstitutional for a newly-elected majority government in Britain?
Yes.
What's the clearest example of this?
Sacking people without due process.
And without notice and/or action by Congress where explicitly required by legislation
Terminating funding voted by Congress without authorisation (which I suppose is linked).
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
I don't know why you peeps bother. I just assume that @williamglenn lives in St Petersburg and has no experience of how the rule of law is supposed to work in a democracy. Has zero understanding of democracy either - the other day he claimed Germany isn't a democracy because the AfD aren't part of the government.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
He has so radically changed his viewpoint over the last decade, than I think he is either: *) Utterly trolling us. *) Not the same WilliamGlenn, and instead a hijacked account.
Even in the UK if Parliament had passed laws that required spending on specific things, the Prime Minister couldn’t just ignore that without primary legislation.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
Her unwavering support for Senile Joe:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reaffirmed her commitment to President Joe Biden as the presumptive Democratic nominee on Monday evening amid heightened tensions within the party over his mental fitness.
“Joe Biden is our nominee, he is not leaving this race, he is in this race and I support him,” Ocasio-Cortez told a group of reporters outside of the Capitol.
The New York rep’s assertion comes as Democratic lawmakers scramble to find consensus on whether or not to support Biden, 81, as the presidential nominee.
At least six House Democrats have publicly called for the president to withdraw from the race following his disappointing and concerning debate performance at the end of June. The president’s failure to confidently debate his political opponent has led to concerns that he is not well enough to run a campaign or defeat Donald Trump.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Too many of the Democratic top-brass seem to assume that, you know, swingback. Not realising Trump is taking a wrecking ball to cosy assumptions.
They need some whip-smart street fighters. Preferably under the age of 70.
Fuel is extraordinarily cheap now. Just filled up at 129p. Approaching a 25% real terms cut since 2010.
Amazed you have a nasty petrol car, would have had you down as a prius or leaf driver.
I'm going to try and get this thing to 140,000 miles, but we've had a few rusty things fall off the bottom in the last year...
I'd absolutely love the next one to be an EV but 1) we live in a flat with no charging infrastructure 2) cars are way too expensive for us to justify the additional cost 3) fuel is super cheap
Can sitting Senators or Congressmen be senior officials in an Administration without stepping down?
(Trump's running down of the Republican Congressional majority by appointing some to his Administration suggests not, but I have never seen it written down anywhere.)
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
I'm no fan at all of AOC but she couldn't possibly be as bad as this one. Even if she can be just as arrogant she is at least possessed of a functioning brain.
I know little of her aside from the more superficial stuff. I don’t think the ‘she can’t be any worse’ argument cuts it really. She could easily.
Can sitting Senators or Congressmen be senior officials in an Administration without stepping down?
(Trump's running down of the Republican Congressional majority by appointing some to his Administration suggests not, but I have never seen it written down anywhere.)
The GOP House majority is still at 5 as the stupid party thought it a good idea to run two cancer sufferers in their seventies as candidates last November. They have subsequently died.
@SpeakerJohnson The House is working overtime to limit the abuses of activist federal judges. Our @JudiciaryGOP will expose the worst offenders in a high profile hearing & we are preparing urgent legislative action, like the @repdarrellissa bill to stop unfounded nationwide injunctions.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
I'm no fan at all of AOC but she couldn't possibly be as bad as this one. Even if she can be just as arrogant she is at least possessed of a functioning brain.
I know little of her aside from the more superficial stuff. I don’t think the ‘she can’t be any worse’ argument cuts it really. She could easily.
I think it would be particularly hard to be more malevolent and inimical to democracy or Western interests than Trump. Not easy at all.
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
I'm no fan at all of AOC but she couldn't possibly be as bad as this one. Even if she can be just as arrogant she is at least possessed of a functioning brain.
I know little of her aside from the more superficial stuff. I don’t think the ‘she can’t be any worse’ argument cuts it really. She could easily.
The Dems need to look outside of DC and outside of coastal liberalism for their next candidate
What will happen to Democratic candidates’ accounts as we approach the US midterms?
The "titans of free speech" who had the nerve to come to Europe and lecture us. It is just sickening to observe the maga hypocrisy.
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
A thread I have planned is that the crisis could come much sooner than the mid terms.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
I would like to believe this but with the Democrats even less popular than the Republicans right now, I'm doubtful.
Unpopular for being supine.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
What would make her a good president ?
I'm no fan at all of AOC but she couldn't possibly be as bad as this one. Even if she can be just as arrogant she is at least possessed of a functioning brain.
I know little of her aside from the more superficial stuff. I don’t think the ‘she can’t be any worse’ argument cuts it really. She could easily.
She's a lefty Taz, you're never going to like her.
Fair enough, but frankly no one who is willing to adhere to the US constitution is going to be worse than Trump.
Comments
I can't see how she can.
https://x.com/ianbremmer/status/1903648999283782011?s=61
And yes, the mid-terms are going to be a nail biter when it comes to the prospects for constitutional democracy vs authoritarianism in the US. I think it is 50/50 between overriding and supreme court decision and tanking the midterms as the definitive moment. I mean ignoring court orders on deportation due process is bad enough. But I think the other two will be the flash point for a serious crisis in America.
With special elections/defection it is possible the Dems take control of the House this year.
UKTV industry apparently in crisis, although from the article it is the Beeb and itv.
The solution to this non problem is, of course, more money from taxpayers rather than finding new streams of income, nice timing too given the current debate on future funding of the BBC.
The BBC seems to favour a sliding scale with wealthier homes paying more than less well off homes.
It’s time to get rid of the license fee, fund the network from general taxation, and let the BBC seek its funding in the open market.
Focus internally, rebuild unity and discipline. Develop some new ideas and solutions. And have patience.
Turns out it was the message as well as the messenger
They can work around it, but the authorities can work around the work arounds.
Just sayin'.
Edit - empowering improperly appointed persons to seize and/or destroy government files.
Some work nonetheless, like the Liberal Unionist-Conservative coalition a century ago. Some don't for that reason.
Political alliances are much more likely to work when they are seen as a permanent merger, rather than a temporary electoral expedient, when they coalesce around a charismatic leader, and when the non-coalition party keeps shooting itself in the foot.
I'd say Starmer and Reeves are doing their best to help with the latter, but the other two are still some way off.
Musk's "I'll double USA Tesla production" was at the White House car show 2 weeks ago:
https://fortune.com/2025/03/12/elon-musk-double-tesla-us-car-production/
The sooner the better.
Unfortunately only an economic crash in the USA and subsequent voter punishment which is so great even the GOP attempts to steal the mid terms don’t succeed can change the trajectory. That also means we’ll have to suffer the economic effects here as well.
You'd really have to start at the kindergarten level with this fool, not that they have any interest in answers to all the "questions" they ask. You'd have to start by saying that even though the United Kingdom and the United States both begin with the same word, they are actually different countries with different constitutions. But it's a waste of time with this troll.
*) Utterly trolling us.
*) Not the same WilliamGlenn, and instead a hijacked account.
But would you really want to be a supine dog in order to preserve the ability to continue being a supine dog… surely better to go down in a blaze of glory?
https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/5138472#Comment_5138472
The point of my question today was to explore how much of the reaction to Trump on here is just vicarious outrage. In Britain it's normal for a Prime Minister to have the power to abolish or merge government departments, so if the American system tries to prevent Trump doing similar, why regard Trump as the problem rather than the system?
discord rather than be consistent
In any case, that was not your question. And as has been pointed out, a very considerable amounts of what Trump is doing in America would be illegal in this country, and since the PM does not have immunity from prosecution would likely lead to a prison sentence if somebody tried them here.
I'll leave it up to you whether I'm referring to Boris or Mike.
He is a proper Tankie, and enthusiastically adopts the new position when the party line changes. We have always been at war with EastAsia.
"Posted from a country that has a "Brandmauer" that means 20% of voters get ignored in the name of democracy."
You apparently haven't noticed that in pretty much every democracy a big chunk of voters have their choice 'ignored' after every election.
It would actually be less democratic if parties that gave absolute guarantees before an election not to work with the AfD, then junked those guarantees after the election.
Of course it's entirely up to the Americans if they want to give the president those powers (maybe there are good reasons not to, I don't know). US courts seem to be saying that some of the things Trump is doing are illegal, so the Republicans would, I assume, have to get legislation through Congress to give Trump these powers. Or ignore the courts and declare a dictatorship.
What's normal in Britain isn't relevant at all.
Trump can desire to change the system all he wants. He can’t decree it has changed as if he were a king.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/polls-show-democrats-losing-popularity-making-2026-gains.html
I think we should extend it to Britain. Abolish the brandmauer that both Labour and Conservatives erect to deny the SNP their rightful seats in Cabinet.
Those speaking out like Bernie and AOC are getting vast support.
AOC would be a great president, assuming that there are further US elections.
It's going to come down to whether the voters are real 'ornery and in a mood to punish MAGA by then. Fair chance of that. If the scales start to fall from their eyes, they will see just how much they have been Trump's useful idiots.
I'd say he comes across as a standard Trump appointee. He is perceived as successful in one of the small number of narrow fields that Trump thinks he knows ("Real Estate"), and is therefore assumed to be some kind of Universal Expert.
Considering hedging. Down to 3.45. Will wait a bit. He should be shorter.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reaffirmed her commitment to President Joe Biden as the presumptive Democratic nominee on Monday evening amid heightened tensions within the party over his mental fitness.
“Joe Biden is our nominee, he is not leaving this race, he is in this race and I support him,” Ocasio-Cortez told a group of reporters outside of the Capitol.
The New York rep’s assertion comes as Democratic lawmakers scramble to find consensus on whether or not to support Biden, 81, as the presidential nominee.
At least six House Democrats have publicly called for the president to withdraw from the race following his disappointing and concerning debate performance at the end of June. The president’s failure to confidently debate his political opponent has led to concerns that he is not well enough to run a campaign or defeat Donald Trump.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/aoc-backing-biden-democratic-nominee-b2576756.html
Dodgy Donald is a DANGEROUSLY UNHINGED doddery old fool.
I wonder if the blowback on the other things they have done will have made this obvious one to address relatively more palatable.
They need some whip-smart street fighters. Preferably under the age of 70.
"You're right, it was ALL bad!"
I'd absolutely love the next one to be an EV but 1) we live in a flat with no charging infrastructure 2) cars are way too expensive for us to justify the additional cost 3) fuel is super cheap
Can sitting Senators or Congressmen be senior officials in an Administration without stepping down?
(Trump's running down of the Republican Congressional majority by appointing some to his Administration suggests not, but I have never seen it written down anywhere.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_representatives#Vacancies
Fair enough, but frankly no one who is willing to adhere to the US constitution is going to be worse than Trump.