politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The post Nick v Nigel debate reaction
My own feeling is that the real loser from tonight is David Cameron and The Tories, today and next week, Nigel Farage has been given one hour to hoover up the Euro-sceptic vote.
Given how much more popular Farage is than Clegg, not surprising that he would edge it even if Clegg has walked all over him (which clearly did not happen), but encouraging for Farage that it was so close with Labour I'd say, even if Clegg's name is mud among such people he does represent closer to their view.
Clegg won't mind 'losing', if he can gain a few points come May he'll consider it job done, and who won the debate won't actually impact things that much, it just matters if a few people are shifted in his favour as a result.
The 2 things I took from tonight's debate, Farage has contempt for British workers, made outrageous remarks about Ukraine and given the chance will abolish the equal rights the LBGT community has fought hard to win.
Telegraph poll had 79/21 so it gives a good indication of how unrepresentative their readers are: ie. about 15-20 percentage points. No surprise of course.
The 2 things I took from tonight's debate, Farage has contempt for British workers, made outrageous remarks about Ukraine and given the chance will abolish the equal rights the LBGT community has fought hard to win.
A breakdown of Scottish viewers would be interesting.
Er, call me mister geek, but I was out shopping for hoodies (off to chilly Connemara tomorrow) and missed the debate. Was it on TV? Is there a catch-up service?
Mrs J listened to the full hour with me. For new readers, she's a Turkish-Feminist-Pesceterian-Liberal. She slightly sided with Clegg, but got annoyed with both of them, and also thought both made good points.
The 2 things I took from tonight's debate, Farage has contempt for British workers, made outrageous remarks about Ukraine and given the chance will abolish the equal rights the LBGT community has fought hard to win.
And slagging off British food and cars - annoyed me.
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling. You have to feel sorry for tories having to cheer on the missing fop. Cammie wants to stay IN Europe in case they have somehow managed to forget. It's as funny as when Cammie linked the floods to climate change and they got very upset indeed for having to be reminded what their leader believes.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
Clegg refusing to look at Farage and looking bored / at his notes / closing his eyes while Farage spoke should be interpreted by UKIP as establishment refusing to listen to anything that upsets their cosy status quo
The winners tonight? Emmerdale and Coronation St of course. So no change there...
How many people in the UK even knew this debate was taking place - let alone were interested enough to watch it? A few thousand maybe?
A pathetic response, if you'll forgive the harshness of tone. Of course very few people watch such things, but by that logic, anything any politician says at almost any time is meaningless because very few people see or hear it, let alone care. Such events still have an impact as they can help shape the media narrative and people not hugely interested in politics will pick things up.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
36% isn't bad for someone toxic. Just a few percent shy off the current YES poll rating.
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
I doubt this will have shifted many Labour or LD votes. Not so sure the same can be said for Tory and UKIP ones. If I were Dave I'd be ever so slightly concerned.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
For that alone he deserves nil points and zero seats
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
I doubt this will have shifted many Labour or LD votes. Not so sure the same can be said for Tory and UKIP ones. If I were Dave I'd be ever so slightly concerned.
can't really see that, status quo I suspect. It will help UKIP with the Euros but the GE will remain on the economics.
@FoxinSox - I suspect Ashworth was given that slot by Labour to see if he could hack it in a low-profile, undemanding situation with a view to possible future promotion to more high-profile stuff. He blew it. Very poor indeed.
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
so why aren't you living in Scotland ? Is it a self hate thing ?
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
36% isn't bad for someone toxic.
The lib dems have a taxi full of MSPs in scotland and are now a political irrelevance. I know Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
Well, I didn't watch it and there is of course a second debate next week so as we discovered in 2010 instant post-first debate analysis and polls can be hugely misleading.
What will be interesting to see is the lessons the two participants learn from tonight with a view to next week's exchanges.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
That above, if not an absolute lie comes damn close to it. Farage actually said that religious bodies, Church, Synagogue, Mosque, are against SSM at present and most would be against ceremonies conducted on their premises. Until this is sorted out, said Farage, UKIP would consider thinking again. He said nothing about about abolishing SSM carried out in a civil ceremony.
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
so why aren't you living in Scotland ? Is it a self hate thing ?
I doubt this will have shifted many Labour or LD votes. Not so sure the same can be said for Tory and UKIP ones. If I were Dave I'd be ever so slightly concerned.
can't really see that, status quo I suspect. It will help UKIP with the Euros but the GE will remain on the economics.
What status quo though? Farage spoke passionately about an issue that is dear to the hearts of many Tory activists and MPs. That's bad news for Dave and doubly so if Farage manages to keep a few more folk on the UKIP express.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
That above, if not an absolute lie comes damn close to it. Farage actually said that religious bodies, Church, Synagogue, Mosque, are against SSM at present and most would be against ceremonies conducted on their premises. Until this is sorted out, said Farage, UKIP would consider thinking again. He said nothing about about abolishing SSM carried out in a civil ceremony.
Semantics - he is anti gay marriage - that came across as clear as his Putin hero worship.
The 2 things I took from tonight's debate, Farage has contempt for British workers, made outrageous remarks about Ukraine and given the chance will abolish the equal rights the LBGT community has fought hard to win.
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
36% isn't bad for someone toxic.
The lib dems have a taxi full of MSPs in scotland and are now a political irrelevance. I know Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
Clegg's toxicity is a well known fact, but your claim he was easily beaten by Farage is not a fact at all. Some will think so, some will not, but it is not something that cannot be disputed, unlike his toxicity (which I maintain reaches absurd proportions that reflect poorly on the public, but cannot be denied as his name is poison among a great many segments of the voters)
Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
This isn't true though. Clegg is widely respected.
I doubt this will have shifted many Labour or LD votes. Not so sure the same can be said for Tory and UKIP ones. If I were Dave I'd be ever so slightly concerned.
can't really see that, status quo I suspect. It will help UKIP with the Euros but the GE will remain on the economics.
What status quo though? Farage spoke passionately about an issue that is dear to the hearts of many Tory activists and MPs. That's bad news for Dave and doubly so if Farage manages to keep a few more folk on the UKIP express.
Yeah, but activists aren't any more important than joe public, they both have one vote. Joe public worries about the economy employment and paying the bills. So there may be a short term UKIP boost for the Euros but at the GE its cash is king.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
That above, if not an absolute lie comes damn close to it. Farage actually said that religious bodies, Church, Synagogue, Mosque, are against SSM at present and most would be against ceremonies conducted on their premises. Until this is sorted out, said Farage, UKIP would consider thinking again. He said nothing about about abolishing SSM carried out in a civil ceremony.
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
so why aren't you living in Scotland ? Is it a self hate thing ?
Not at all, if you don't like where you live why do you live there ? Seems daft to me.
Clegg refusing to look at Farage and looking bored / at his notes / closing his eyes while Farage spoke should be interpreted by UKIP as establishment refusing to listen to anything that upsets their cosy status quo
And when someone points out Farage didn't look at him either (outside the odd glance)?
As a Lib Dem supporter, I still thought Farage edged the debate. Nick Clegg started strongly, but seemed to lose a little energy as the hour wore on. He also got too bogged down in statistics.
Given the sizeable Eurosceptic vote, the 57-36 score isn't bad. I think he's capable of doing better in a week's time.
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
so why aren't you living in Scotland ? Is it a self hate thing ?
Not at all, if you don't like where you live why do you live there ? Seems daft to me.
Just cos one likes one place does not mean one has to dislike all other places.
Clegg refusing to look at Farage and looking bored / at his notes / closing his eyes while Farage spoke should be interpreted by UKIP as establishment refusing to listen to anything that upsets their cosy status quo
And when someone points out Farage didn't look at him either (outside the odd glance)?
Then I would say, watch it again, you've got it wrong
Sky News just ran a piece showing Clegg refusing to look at Farage, while Farage was looking at him directly, asking questions
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
so why aren't you living in Scotland ? Is it a self hate thing ?
Not at all, if you don't like where you live why do you live there ? Seems daft to me.
Just cos one likes one place does not mean one has to dislike all other places.
Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
This isn't true though. Clegg is widely respected.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
That above, if not an absolute lie comes damn close to it. Farage actually said that religious bodies, Church, Synagogue, Mosque, are against SSM at present and most would be against ceremonies conducted on their premises. Until this is sorted out, said Farage, UKIP would consider thinking again. He said nothing about about abolishing SSM carried out in a civil ceremony.
He was asked if HE was against Gay Marriage and he said he was. He was asked about the legislation and said if UK withdraws from the ECHR UKIP would look at it again. What reason would they look at it? To admire the drafting? No simply to abolish it. No other explanation from your Putin apologist leader.
Because they were aiming at different audiences. Farage was pitching to the 70% of Conservatives who are Eurosceptic, and may well have picked up quite a few votes. Clegg was pitching to the 30% of Conservatives who are Europhilic and the 50% of Labour-ites who are likewise: he may also have picked up a few votes.
Farage was very strong on Europe; Clegg was poor, and missed a number of opportunities.
Farage was weak when he moved away from Europe. Gay marriage and Russia/Putin are areas where UKIP can only lose votes and he needs to stay on message, otherwise the danger is that he'll be goaded into saying something pretty dumb someday.
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
36% isn't bad for someone toxic.
The lib dems have a taxi full of MSPs in scotland and are now a political irrelevance. I know Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
Clegg's toxicity is a well known fact, but your claim he was easily beaten by Farage is not a fact at all.
Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
This isn't true though. Clegg is widely respected.
Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
This isn't true though. Clegg is widely respected.
Why do you say that? In the leader ratings polls he places last.
Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
This isn't true though. Clegg is widely respected.
Why do you say that? In the leader ratings polls he places last.
When Omnium says "widely respected", what he actually means is "liked by his wife and mother; tolerated by his children."
The comments under there are going to be brilliant, can almost hear the grinding of teeth from here.
Hodges is a genius. I don't he is always right - in fact I usually think he is wrong - but he has this talent for knowing how to perfectly stir things up to infuriate or please the Telegraph Commenters depending on the topic. I think he has a lot of fun in his job.
Clegg refusing to look at Farage and looking bored / at his notes / closing his eyes while Farage spoke should be interpreted by UKIP as establishment refusing to listen to anything that upsets their cosy status quo
And when someone points out Farage didn't look at him either (outside the odd glance)?
Then I would say, watch it again, you've got it wrong
Sky News just ran a piece showing Clegg refusing to look at Farage, while Farage was looking at him directly, asking questions
Must have been later on when he forgot himself a bit. He spent at least the first half tilting his body but always looking outwards.
Mr. Easterross, d'you mean he said he'd abolish gay marriage?
He was asked if he agreed with gay marriage and he said no. He then said that if UKIP can get UK to withdraw from ECHR UKIP would look again at the Gay Marriage legislation (with a view to abolishing it).
That above, if not an absolute lie comes damn close to it. Farage actually said that religious bodies, Church, Synagogue, Mosque, are against SSM at present and most would be against ceremonies conducted on their premises. Until this is sorted out, said Farage, UKIP would consider thinking again. He said nothing about about abolishing SSM carried out in a civil ceremony.
He was asked if HE was against Gay Marriage and he said he was. He was asked about the legislation and said if UK withdraws from the ECHR UKIP would look at it again. What reason would they look at it? To admire the drafting? No simply to abolish it. No other explanation from your Putin apologist leader.
The gay marriage stuff puts Farage firmly in Nasty Party territory. Loathsome man.
I doubt this will have shifted many Labour or LD votes. Not so sure the same can be said for Tory and UKIP ones. If I were Dave I'd be ever so slightly concerned.
I believe the YouGov poll had just under half Labour supporters backing Mr Farage, and 20% of LD supporters too.
Clegg's ostrich faction are simply unable to understand the fact that calamity Clegg is toxic to a very sizeable part of the electorate. The debates were always a desperate tactic from a desperate leader of a party still heading inexorably for yet another hammering in May.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth. Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
36% isn't bad for someone toxic.
The lib dems have a taxi full of MSPs in scotland and are now a political irrelevance. I know Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
Clegg's toxicity is a well known fact, but your claim he was easily beaten by Farage is not a fact at all.
You didn't read my comment? A fact cannot be disputed - and that Clegg is toxic cannot be disputed, even if some might think it is unfair on him to a certain degree - and a significant minority in that poll apparently think Clegg won. A majority may well think otherwise, but labelling that opinion as a fact in the mould of Clegg being toxic is not true.
We appear to have reverted to the old habit of 'kle4 and Mickpork cannot agree on semantic definitions' on this one.
OGH: "It is amongst this group where you can get the longer odds and our friend Shadsy has just tightened the 8/1 that I put £100 on in one seat to 4/1. I’m not revealing which one because I hope to get good value from other bookies."
I fancy Mike was referring here to his bet on the LibDems holding Brent Central which Ladbrokes do indeed have on offer at 4/1.
On topic, I haven't seen any real coverage of the debate, in which I'm probably in 99%+ of the population. As such, ref
My own feeling is that the real loser from tonight is David Cameron and The Tories, today and next week, Nigel Farage has been given one hour to hoover up the Euro-sceptic vote
I would be a lot more concerned as a Conservative if the elections were closer than 8 weeks away and if the debate were seen by a substantial portion of the population.
The comments under there are going to be brilliant, can almost hear the grinding of teeth from here.
Hodges is a genius. I don't he is always right - in fact I usually think he is wrong - but he has this talent for knowing how to perfectly stir things up to infuriate or please the Telegraph Commenters depending on the topic. I think he has a lot of fun in his job.
Why do you say that? In the leader ratings polls he places last.
Sure, he's earned no votes. He has however demonstrated that coalition is possible, is workable, and is an option. I doubt there's an MP that wouldn't class that as an enormous achievement. The public will catch up. I don't imagine that it changes votes though.
Clegg is toxic. You'll see it proved yet again in May. Europe was supposedly the lib dems trump card but calamity Clegg gets easily beaten by a leader of a party that have no MPs and were at 3.1% in 2010. They won't be be 3.1% in 2015 which is why the fop chicken Cammie is terrified of the kippers.
This isn't true though. Clegg is widely respected.
By his ostrich faction of lib dem spinners?
LOL
No, mainly by people that listen and think.
By the mythical 'Alarm Clock Britain' Calamity Clegg was banging on about before that inept spin was laughed out of politics?
Clegg's an idiot. He thought yet more public exposure would somehow negate his toxicity with the voters. It hasn't and it won't. He's been doing his amusing radio phone-in for all this time in a feeble effort to repeat Blair's 'masochism' strategy. Yet he he somehow hasn't realised it didn't work for Blair or that the lib dems have been flatlining on 10% since late 2010 and show no sign whatsoever of 'surging' away from that.
As someone who would vote 'yes' in the September referendum if I still lived in Scotland, can the "Better Together" campaign please be led by Nick Clegg?
so why aren't you living in Scotland ? Is it a self hate thing ?
Not at all, if you don't like where you live why do you live there ? Seems daft to me.
Just cos one likes one place does not mean one has to dislike all other places.
Guilt getting to you ?
You are behaving oddly. Probably best to just ignore you today.
The more time passes - since the debate - the more Farage is deemed the winner. This time on the Telegraph poll, Farage is now leading by 80% v Clegg's 20%.
The winners tonight? Emmerdale and Coronation St of course. So no change there...
How many people in the UK even knew this debate was taking place - let alone were interested enough to watch it? A few thousand maybe?
Spot on.
Yet another non-event that PBers get excited about but normal people barely notice.
A bit like the Scottish Independence referendum then.
Try asking Scots if they have noticed the indyref. Must be pretty close to 100 %. Then ask them if they noticed Farage-Clegg. Must be pretty close to zero.
The winners tonight? Emmerdale and Coronation St of course. So no change there...
How many people in the UK even knew this debate was taking place - let alone were interested enough to watch it? A few thousand maybe?
Spot on.
Yet another non-event that PBers get excited about but normal people barely notice.
So what? Hardly anyone watches PMQs, or Daily Politics when you compare to the population at large, but they still make headlines and soundbites. All this was expected to do, it achieved. That normal people won't care is not even really relevant here.
The implication when people make arguments about the 'non-event' status of these things is that this is apparently a shock, as though political debates would be expected to have a direct impact on people in a major way and thus, gosh, what a let down. Of course it is non event if you assess it on those terms. Assess it on the terms of what it actually was and was intended to be - a little watched but, its participant's hope, possibly much talked about event which helps set a narrative and generates some easy headlines and soundbites - and on those terms? We shall have to wait for the full assessment, but given nearly all political events are only of interest to political wonks like ourselves, it did the job well enough
A pathetic response, if you'll forgive the harshness of tone. Of course very few people watch such things, but by that logic, anything any politician says at almost any time is meaningless because very few people see or hear it, let alone care. Such events still have an impact as they can help shape the media narrative and people not hugely interested in politics will pick things up.
Sure, I'll forgive the tone of your first sentence - you obviously took my jokey comment seriously...
There's nothing I can particularly take issue with in the remainder of your post.
On topic, I haven't seen any real coverage of the debate, in which I'm probably in 99%+ of the population. As such, ref
My own feeling is that the real loser from tonight is David Cameron and The Tories, today and next week, Nigel Farage has been given one hour to hoover up the Euro-sceptic vote
I would be a lot more concerned as a Conservative if the elections were closer than 8 weeks away and if the debate were seen by a substantial portion of the population.
I think UKIP had the eurosceptic voters last week.
The real danger for the Conservatives and Labour is if Mr Clegg's gambit pays out, and the pro-EU voters do treat the LDs as "the party of in" when they cast their EU Parliament votes.
Tarage looked most uncomfortable when confronted with his own antics over troughing, and as soon as he entered non europe related topics entered fruitcake territory, slagging off British cars, food and gay marriage.
The poor performance of Kipper MEPs in terms of voting and sleaze should be highlighted. I find it hard to believe that Farages wife is preparing papers at midnight for Nigel, so he can not bother speaking or voting on them the next day.
As a Lib Dem supporter, I still thought Farage edged the debate. Nick Clegg started strongly, but seemed to lose a little energy as the hour wore on. He also got too bogged down in statistics.
Given the sizeable Eurosceptic vote, the 57-36 score isn't bad. I think he's capable of doing better in a week's time.
Comments
Tory supporters:
Farage 70%
Clegg 20%
Labour supporters:
Clegg 51%
Farage 42%
UKIP supporters:
Farage 93%
LD supporters:
Clegg 77%
Farage 20%
Clegg won't mind 'losing', if he can gain a few points come May he'll consider it job done, and who won the debate won't actually impact things that much, it just matters if a few people are shifted in his favour as a result.
It's a victory for Salmond.
( well you know it's only a matter of time until one of the nats says it )
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2014/mar/26/nigel-farage-vs-nick-clegg-the-debate-for-europe-live#block-53333857e4b07edc52cb9748
How many people in the UK even knew this debate was taking place - let alone were interested enough to watch it? A few thousand maybe?
I gave Nigel the win by 60/40; but then thats just me.
That can only be seen as a win for Farage.
And slagging off British food and cars - annoyed me.
What should put the fear of god into those lib dems that are still left is the prospect of calamity Clegg in the 2015 debates where he will be put on the spot repeatedly for "no more broken promises" and which of his policies and manifesto promises of his can be trusted or are red lines. If he does this badly on Europe then it's a very safe bet voters will not be having any 'Cleggasms' his Blair lite delivery produced the last time.
That said Farage was also saying all the things that the tory base would dearly wish the Cast Iron chicken Cameron would say which is also reflected in the polling. You have to feel sorry for tories having to cheer on the missing fop. Cammie wants to stay IN Europe in case they have somehow managed to forget. It's as funny as when Cammie linked the floods to climate change and they got very upset indeed for having to be reminded what their leader believes.
The Labour spinner on Sky sounded utterly pathetic and out of his depth.
Whoever thought it was a good idea to put him on needs a good kick up the arse.
Jon Ashworth is a pillock.
Money talks. UKIP cut from 6/4 to 11/10 at the bookies to win most votes at the Euro elections.
can't really see that, status quo I suspect. It will help UKIP with the Euros but the GE will remain on the economics.
The gay marriage position is not one I subscribe to, and abolishing it would be a petty, retrograde step.
Swiss Cottage is a big roundabout - you'd only ever say that you lived there if the alternative was Kilburn, but even then I'd go for Kilburn.
Well, I didn't watch it and there is of course a second debate next week so as we discovered in 2010 instant post-first debate analysis and polls can be hugely misleading.
What will be interesting to see is the lessons the two participants learn from tonight with a view to next week's exchanges.
Farage actually said that religious bodies, Church, Synagogue, Mosque, are against SSM at present and most would be against ceremonies conducted on their premises. Until this is sorted out, said Farage, UKIP would consider thinking again. He said nothing about about abolishing SSM carried out in a civil ceremony.
Farage 1301
Clegg 557
Given the sizeable Eurosceptic vote, the 57-36 score isn't bad. I think he's capable of doing better in a week's time.
Sky News just ran a piece showing Clegg refusing to look at Farage, while Farage was looking at him directly, asking questions
Good name for a pber.
LOL
But, actually, they both won.
Because they were aiming at different audiences. Farage was pitching to the 70% of Conservatives who are Eurosceptic, and may well have picked up quite a few votes. Clegg was pitching to the 30% of Conservatives who are Europhilic and the 50% of Labour-ites who are likewise: he may also have picked up a few votes.
Farage was very strong on Europe; Clegg was poor, and missed a number of opportunities.
Farage was weak when he moved away from Europe. Gay marriage and Russia/Putin are areas where UKIP can only lose votes and he needs to stay on message, otherwise the danger is that he'll be goaded into saying something pretty dumb someday.
BREAKING: FARAGE WINS. Nigel beats Nick 57-36 - @YouGov/Sun poll: http://bit.ly/1p7HCRv
No, mainly by people that listen and think.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-26754300
Lose lose situation for Labour over Welsh NHS.
*chortle*
At least she turned up though, unlike the fop chicken.
Yet another non-event that PBers get excited about but normal people barely notice.
We appear to have reverted to the old habit of 'kle4 and Mickpork cannot agree on semantic definitions' on this one.
OGH: "It is amongst this group where you can get the longer odds and our friend Shadsy has just tightened the 8/1 that I put £100 on in one seat to 4/1. I’m not revealing which one because I hope to get good value from other bookies."
I fancy Mike was referring here to his bet on the LibDems holding Brent Central which Ladbrokes do indeed have on offer at 4/1.
My own feeling is that the real loser from tonight is David Cameron and The Tories, today and next week, Nigel Farage has been given one hour to hoover up the Euro-sceptic vote
I would be a lot more concerned as a Conservative if the elections were closer than 8 weeks away and if the debate were seen by a substantial portion of the population.
Clegg's an idiot. He thought yet more public exposure would somehow negate his toxicity with the voters. It hasn't and it won't. He's been doing his amusing radio phone-in for all this time in a feeble effort to repeat Blair's 'masochism' strategy. Yet he he somehow hasn't realised it didn't work for Blair or that the lib dems have been flatlining on 10% since late 2010 and show no sign whatsoever of 'surging' away from that.
Lord Ashcroft @LordAshcroft 6m
Bookies make it 11/10 that UKIP win a seat at the General Election.
13/8 UNIBET Yes
4/6 Ladbrokes No
This time on the Telegraph poll, Farage is now leading by 80% v Clegg's 20%.
The implication when people make arguments about the 'non-event' status of these things is that this is apparently a shock, as though political debates would be expected to have a direct impact on people in a major way and thus, gosh, what a let down. Of course it is non event if you assess it on those terms. Assess it on the terms of what it actually was and was intended to be - a little watched but, its participant's hope, possibly much talked about event which helps set a narrative and generates some easy headlines and soundbites - and on those terms? We shall have to wait for the full assessment, but given nearly all political events are only of interest to political wonks like ourselves, it did the job well enough
There's nothing I can particularly take issue with in the remainder of your post.
The real danger for the Conservatives and Labour is if Mr Clegg's gambit pays out, and the pro-EU voters do treat the LDs as "the party of in" when they cast their EU Parliament votes.
The poor performance of Kipper MEPs in terms of voting and sleaze should be highlighted. I find it hard to believe that Farages wife is preparing papers at midnight for Nigel, so he can not bother speaking or voting on them the next day.