Is Mark Carney the man to defeat the Conservatives? – politicalbetting.com
Mark Carney (yes, that Mark Carney) opens as 6/5 favourite to replace Justin Trudeau as Liberal Party Leaderhttps://t.co/DIiC9EqRU8 pic.twitter.com/Kyli4i1kId
5 minutes before a new header is posted, TSE or whoever's in charge at the time posts a 5 minute warning in bold on the old thread. Would help to moderate the curse of the new thread and reduce the FPT count.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
Trump really is going to push Europe to pay for its own defence this time isn’t he. The one benefit to world of his approach, because we may have to actually do it.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
No, the Single Market is the UK's biggest export market.
A trade deal with the US makes the UK beholden to Trump, a man who does not believe that deals are worth the paper they are written on. Just ask Canada and Mexico.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
Nvidia, $NVDA, announces Project Digits personal computer at $3000, that is approximately 1,000 times more powerful than the average laptop.
The device is powered by an Nvidia GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip, which houses separate, linked components on a single chip to reduce the time it takes to move data between them.
Excellent news, if true. With wages rising, a small step on the rocky path towards more affordable housing.
While a slow reduction in house prices is probably welcome, this is just a nonsense headline.
Considering it's a 0.2% drop, and we had a 0.9% drop as recently as March, or that last month was a 1.2% rise, it appears to be a nothing stat right now.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Only if the deal is in the UK's interests - which it wouldn't be.
In any case, Canada and Mexico negotiated a deal with Trump, which he is now royally ratting on. There is zero value in any deal with Trump as he is a fundamentally unreliable partner and if we do a deal it will, on balance, tie us closer to the US and so make us more vulnerable to their policies.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
The real-world impact of AI - The University of Sydney and Accenture built a whale conservation system that uses Claude to analyze underwater microphone recordings and detect minke whales with 89.4% accuracy (up from 76.5% with traditional methods)
This transforms a two-week manual process into real-time monitoring across thousands of kilometers of North American coastline, where conservation teams can now instantly redirect ships, pause drilling operations, and adjust fishing zones to protect whales.. https://x.com/btibor91/status/1876630816199217208
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
The resistance won't come from farmers, it will come from consumers.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
When you went MAGA, did you also join the Jesuits ?
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
'She's not doing too badly.' Spits out coffee.
Luckily there is polling to tell us how people think her and the government are doing at the moment. And there is the markets.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
"Ming Vase" ought to have been a clue It was always a bollocks analogy.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
The resistance won't come from farmers, it will come from consumers.
Are we talking about Trump again ? As in his case, there's a good chance of it being both.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
Greece and Turkey re Cyprus even more so.
But. The US is the bedrock of Nato. Without it, Nato changes hugely and arguably becomes something else entirely.
What we should foresee and prepare for is Trump demanding Greenland, and other things like that, in return for continued American membership. At that point, we have to tell Trump where to go.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
She's only utterly useless for some. If you want to increase the balance of the public sector over the private, increasing the size of the state, and if you don't understand or care about the economy, or how much debt we are in, she's very useful.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Actually there is some dispute - legally - as to whether Greenland is “in NATO”. From what I can see on Google anyway
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
Trump needs to remember what happened the last time a loony populist attempted to invade a cold windswept island outpost of a European power in the sub-polar Atlantic.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
No, the Single Market is the UK's biggest export market.
A trade deal with the US makes the UK beholden to Trump, a man who does not believe that deals are worth the paper they are written on. Just ask Canada and Mexico.
I think talk of a US trade deal is largely pie in the sky but it's a bit odd to just dismiss it out of hand.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
The resistance won't come from farmers, it will come from consumers.
Are we talking about Trump again ? As in his case, there's a good chance of it being both.
Fair point. It's not an either-or.
But I don't see a UK-US trade deal without the UK being obliged to accept American agricultural produce and standards, and I don't see parliament - pressured by the public - being willing to accept that. Particularly with a majority of Labour MPs.
I’m not sure now the left will cope with a right wing TwiX, Instagram, and Facebook
It leaves Google as the last woke outlier and they are crumbling
They made $26 billion profit in their last quarterly report, up from about $20 billion a year earlier. Google Cloud in particular grew about 35%, and that used to be seen as the weak spot in the Alphabet empire.
That's some crumbling we could all do with.
No, Google's position is crumbling. I know more than a few people at Google and they're pretty proud that YouTube is the original free speech platform that didn't throw right wingers off like Twitter was for so long. YouTube is probably one of the few parts of the internet that didn't take sides in the US election in 2016, 2020 or 2024. Internally Google is incredibly results driven and DEI schemes are little more than window dressing. It won't be long until those get binned too now that other American companies have done it (McDonald's being the latest domino).
I’m not sure now the left will cope with a right wing TwiX, Instagram, and Facebook
It leaves Google as the last woke outlier and they are crumbling
They made $26 billion profit in their last quarterly report, up from about $20 billion a year earlier. Google Cloud in particular grew about 35%, and that used to be seen as the weak spot in the Alphabet empire.
That's some crumbling we could all do with.
No, Google's position is crumbling. I know more than a few people at Google and they're pretty proud that YouTube is the original free speech platform that didn't throw right wingers off like Twitter was for so long. YouTube is probably one of the few parts of the internet that didn't take sides in the US election in 2016, 2020 or 2024. Internally Google is incredibly results driven and DEI schemes are little more than window dressing. It won't be long until those get binned too now that other American companies have done it (McDonald's being the latest domino).
Yes. That’s what I meant. I don’t mean Google is crumbling as a corporation I mean their Wokeness is crumbling
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
He is changing the world order with far reaching consequences
He said that if all the hostages are not released by his auguration 'all hell will break out'
He is demanding 5% NATO spending, is to implement substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and he was very disparaging about the EU no doubt also with the intention of imposing tariffs
He has scrapped Bidens ban on oil and gas exploration together with a ban on building wind farms
It seems he is likely to meet Putin very soon and it looks like he will demand peace within 6 months
He wants to take back the Panama canal even by force and has Greenland in his sights
I’m not sure now the left will cope with a right wing TwiX, Instagram, and Facebook
It leaves Google as the last woke outlier and they are crumbling
They made $26 billion profit in their last quarterly report, up from about $20 billion a year earlier. Google Cloud in particular grew about 35%, and that used to be seen as the weak spot in the Alphabet empire.
That's some crumbling we could all do with.
No, Google's position is crumbling. I know more than a few people at Google and they're pretty proud that YouTube is the original free speech platform that didn't throw right wingers off like Twitter was for so long. YouTube is probably one of the few parts of the internet that didn't take sides in the US election in 2016, 2020 or 2024. Internally Google is incredibly results driven and DEI schemes are little more than window dressing. It won't be long until those get binned too now that other American companies have done it (McDonald's being the latest domino).
Yes. That’s what I meant. I don’t mean Google is crumbling as a corporation I mean their Wokeness is crumbling
It’s Reddit, not Google, that will be the last resistor to this swingback.
Trump really is going to push Europe to pay for its own defence this time isn’t he. The one benefit to world of his approach, because we may have to actually do it.
Anglo-French-Polish led defence treaty, maybe with Italy/Germany riding on it and the Baltics/Nordics enthusiastically buttressing.
He is changing the world order with far reaching consequences
He said that if all the hostages are not released by his auguration 'all hell will break out'
He is demanding 5% NATO spending, is to implement substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and he was very disparaging about the EU no doubt also with the intention of imposing tariffs
He has scrapped Bidens ban on oil and gas exploration together with a ban on building wind farms
It seems he is likely to meet Putin very soon and it looks like he will demand peace within 6 months
He wants to take back the Panama canal even by force and has Greenland in his sights
The wind farms thing looks to me very much Musk-inspired. They're competition vs solar. I assume the states will just tell him to FO, including a number of red states (like Texas) that have vast and growing wind resources.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
Yep, it does seem as if a choice is going to be forced on the UK some time over the next four years.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
No, the Single Market is the UK's biggest export market.
A trade deal with the US makes the UK beholden to Trump, a man who does not believe that deals are worth the paper they are written on. Just ask Canada and Mexico.
I think talk of a US trade deal is largely pie in the sky but it's a bit odd to just dismiss it out of hand.
He is changing the world order with far reaching consequences
He said that if all the hostages are not released by his auguration 'all hell will break out'
He is demanding 5% NATO spending, is to implement substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and he was very disparaging about the EU no doubt also with the intention of imposing tariffs
He has scrapped Bidens ban on oil and gas exploration together with a ban on building wind farms
It seems he is likely to meet Putin very soon and it looks like he will demand peace within 6 months
He wants to take back the Panama canal even by force and has Greenland in his sights
NATO countries will be raising their defence spending... to protect themselves from invasion by the USA.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Actually there is some dispute - legally - as to whether Greenland is “in NATO”. From what I can see on Google anyway
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
What's interesting about the Greenland situation is that the people seem to be open to the idea of joining the US, it hasn't been rejected out of hand but I guess that's to be expected given how badly Denmark seems to have neglected the place. If I was the government I'd be worried about our overseas territories choosing this option too given how badly we neglect them.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
The truly unnerving revelation came last week when it was revealed that as Starmer entered number 10 he was dismayed and astonished to find “there was no economic plan”
it induces, in me, a kind of existential dread for my nation. We are governed, and have been governed for a long while, by outright morons. This applies to the Tories as much as Labour, indeed it applies to the entire governing classes - civil servants, quangos, legal system, judges, the whole shebang. Possibly the monarchy as well
Re yesterday's debate about the Online Safety Act:
There must be literally millions of posts being made on UK internet forums every single day.
Whilst numerous posts might be deemed to possibly be in breach of a strict interpretation of the Act it is surely completely impractial to think that the police (and in turn CPS) are going to pursue anything other than the very most serious posts - ie posts in connection with things like suicide.
Otherwise where on earth would they start?
I'm not saying I agree with the Act - I don't and I agree with most of the comments posted yesterday. But from a practical point of view I can't see it having any effect on anything which could be considered normal political debate.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Actually there is some dispute - legally - as to whether Greenland is “in NATO”. From what I can see on Google anyway
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
According to the SSW school of diplomacy, Denmark should be paying the $6bn to the USA to take Greenland off them.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
Churchill was forced to give up territory in return for American defence cooperation. Trump is just following in the footsteps of Roosevelt.
Re yesterday's debate about the Online Safety Act:
There must be literally millions of posts being made on UK internet forums every single day.
Whilst numerous posts might be deemed to possibly be in breach of a strict interpretation of the Act it is surely completely impractial to think that the police (and in turn CPS) are going to pursue anything other than the very most serious posts - ie posts in connection with things like suicide.
Otherwise where on earth would they start?
I'm not saying I agree with the Act - I don't and I agree with most of the comments posted yesterday. But from a practical point of view I can't see it having any effect on anything which could be considered normal political debate.
The most serious posts will be those which hurt someone's feelings.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
The resistance won't come from farmers, it will come from consumers.
Provided it's labelled properly "AMERICAN CHICKEN" with a US flag, I'm not sure I'd have a problem with it?
Fundamentally, I want that choice, not for products to be totally excluded from the market for me; I'll decide thanks.
We make ethical choices as consumers all the time.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Actually there is some dispute - legally - as to whether Greenland is “in NATO”. From what I can see on Google anyway
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
What's interesting about the Greenland situation is that the people seem to be open to the idea of joining the US, it hasn't been rejected out of hand but I guess that's to be expected given how badly Denmark seems to have neglected the place. If I was the government I'd be worried about our overseas territories choosing this option too given how badly we neglect them.
Tbf denmark doesn’t neglect it. The Danes pump in huge subsidies because Denmark is desperate to hold on to it, as possession of this massive chunk of the Arctic makes Denmark feel more important
However the Greenlandics don’t like it. They grudgingly accept it for now (coz subsidies) but they dislike the patronising colonial aspect - Danes flying in to do the important jobs coz the locals are too drunk and suicidal
A clever American offer could easily win them over, I suspect. American citizenship, lots of money, protection by the American military. Quite persuasive
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Actually there is some dispute - legally - as to whether Greenland is “in NATO”. From what I can see on Google anyway
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
What's interesting about the Greenland situation is that the people seem to be open to the idea of joining the US, it hasn't been rejected out of hand but I guess that's to be expected given how badly Denmark seems to have neglected the place. If I was the government I'd be worried about our overseas territories choosing this option too given how badly we neglect them.
At $100,000 each, they'd get NE England signing up.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Actually there is some dispute - legally - as to whether Greenland is “in NATO”. From what I can see on Google anyway
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
What's interesting about the Greenland situation is that the people seem to be open to the idea of joining the US, it hasn't been rejected out of hand but I guess that's to be expected given how badly Denmark seems to have neglected the place. If I was the government I'd be worried about our overseas territories choosing this option too given how badly we neglect them.
Tbf denmark doesn’t neglect it. The Danes pump in huge subsidies because Denmark is desperate to hold on to it, as possession of this massive chunk of the Arctic makes Denmark feel more important
However the Greenlandics don’t like it. They grudgingly accept it for now (coz subsidies) but they dislike the patronising colonial aspect - Danes flying in to do the important jobs coz the locals are too drunk and suicidal
A clever American offer could easily win them over, I suspect. American citizenship, lots of money, protection by the American military. Quite persuasive
Wasn't this a feature of several episodes of Borgen?
Almost 30 years after a stealth ship belonging to the media baron Elliot Carver used a sea drill torpedo to sink HMS Devonshire, the Royal Navy frigate resides at the bottom of the South China Sea.
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, has taken on a campaign to get the ship operational again, asking the Ministry of Defence about the cost of repairing it.
There is just one problem: the boat is a fictional frigate seen in the 1997 James Bond film Tomorrow Never Dies.
Cartlidge and his party accidentally mixed up the boat with the HMS Northumberland, the Type 23 frigate that is due to be retired this year because of structural damage.
In a written ministerial question in November last year, the Conservative MP for South Suffolk asked John Healey, the defence secretary, “what estimate he has made of the cost of repairing structural damage to HMS Devonshire”.
Had it not been for the slightly comical, and orgsnised-at-,the-last-minute, British invasion of Iceland in 1940, the Danes would probably still have Iceland, too.
As I remember, the Faroese want independence the most.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
The truly unnerving revelation came last week when it was revealed that as Starmer entered number 10 he was dismayed and astonished to find “there was no economic plan”
it induces, in me, a kind of existential dread for my nation. We are governed, and have been governed for a long while, by outright morons. This applies to the Tories as much as Labour, indeed it applies to the entire governing classes - civil servants, quangos, legal system, judges, the whole shebang. Possibly the monarchy as well
Sweep it all away
The US is the basically the only Western country whose politics isn't infantilised by having someone else as their big brother to backstop their security.
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
The truly unnerving revelation came last week when it was revealed that as Starmer entered number 10 he was dismayed and astonished to find “there was no economic plan”
it induces, in me, a kind of existential dread for my nation. We are governed, and have been governed for a long while, by outright morons. This applies to the Tories as much as Labour, indeed it applies to the entire governing classes - civil servants, quangos, legal system, judges, the whole shebang. Possibly the monarchy as well
Sweep it all away
“there was no economic plan”
Wasn't this one of Wilson's things though? UK needed a proper economic plan. He even set up separate department to plan economics as the Treasury couldn't be trusted to do the job.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
Churchill was forced to give up territory in return for American defence cooperation. Trump is just following in the footsteps of Roosevelt.
Had it not been for the slightly comical, and orgsnised-at-,the-last-minute, British invasion of Iceland in 1940, the Danes would probably still have Iceland, too.
As I remember, the Faroese want independence the most.
The Faroe Islands should be British. We should be using coercion to stop them slaughtering whales.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
Churchill was forced to give up territory in return for American defence cooperation. Trump is just following in the footsteps of Roosevelt.
"Bases for destroyers".
Which was a crap deal, but we were desperate.
Although tbf, the 99 year leases (which would still apply now) weren't needed as the US abandoned many of the bases in 1949, and the remaining few were closed by 1995.
And those 50 x obsolete destroyers I think we'd all mothballed by 1948, although some were reactivated for Korea.
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
And we're relying on the ECHR to save us from the OSB.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
The resistance won't come from farmers, it will come from consumers.
Provided it's labelled properly "AMERICAN CHICKEN" with a US flag, I'm not sure I'd have a problem with it?
Fundamentally, I want that choice, not for products to be totally excluded from the market for me; I'll decide thanks.
We make ethical choices as consumers all the time.
If it's in a pie, burger or bucket, how will you know what flag it is flying? How will you exercise that choice?
There's a genuine taste of expansionism, to this new Trump term.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
Trump has threatened Denmark with a military invasion of Greenland. He has killed NATO today. We all knew he would, of course, but now it's pretty much confirmed. Putin and Xi will be delighted.
How has he killed NATO?
He has threatened to invade the territory of a NATO member state. You don't do that if you believe in, let alone value, NATO.
Territorial disputes between NATO members are nothing new. Just look at Spain and Gibraltar.
It's not a territorial dispute, it's the direct threat of an invasion.
A European army looks all but an inevitability to me. And we would have no choice but to sign up, what with the aggressive rumblings towards the UK we've heard from elements of the Trump administration in recent days. Who'd have thought it?
Churchill was forced to give up territory in return for American defence cooperation. Trump is just following in the footsteps of Roosevelt.
"Bases for destroyers".
Which was a crap deal, but we were desperate.
We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be.
Two countries with a detailed trade agreement with the US threatened with substantial sanctions. And there are people in the UK who think we should be doing a trade deal with Trump!!
The US is the UKs biggest export market at 21.7% followed by Germany 7.3% then Ireland at 6.7%
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
Not a good use of time.
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
With Reeves hollowing out UK agriculture we will probably end up with giant US agribusinesses owning UK farms anyway at which point resistance from farmers to a US trade deal goes away.
The resistance won't come from farmers, it will come from consumers.
Provided it's labelled properly "AMERICAN CHICKEN" with a US flag, I'm not sure I'd have a problem with it?
Fundamentally, I want that choice, not for products to be totally excluded from the market for me; I'll decide thanks.
We make ethical choices as consumers all the time.
If it's in a pie, burger or bucket, how will you know what flag it is flying? How will you exercise that choice?
Just buy M & S British produce, not least because they are quality and supports our farmers
Yep. We sorely need lower house prices. Then there's the switch of resource from wealthy to poor pensioners with the WFA removal driving better take-up of pensions credit. A significant upgrading of workers rights and the minimum wage. Ending the ruinous public sector strikes. Knocking WASPI on the head. Removing the tax advantages of the inequality machine aka private schools. Landing a big borrowing budget without spooking the markets. She's not doing too badly. She needs to get lucky on growth though and I'm not optimistic about that. There are, to put it mildly, clouds gathering.
lol. She has absolutely flatlined growth. See the dismal retail stats over Christmas. A calamitous chancellor. We would literally be better off with Rachel from Accounts
So far she’s been utterly useless and more tax increases may be on the horizon as a consequence.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
The truly unnerving revelation came last week when it was revealed that as Starmer entered number 10 he was dismayed and astonished to find “there was no economic plan”
it induces, in me, a kind of existential dread for my nation. We are governed, and have been governed for a long while, by outright morons. This applies to the Tories as much as Labour, indeed it applies to the entire governing classes - civil servants, quangos, legal system, judges, the whole shebang. Possibly the monarchy as well
Sweep it all away
Well, hmm. Ok. Sweep it all away with what ? Reform?
The reason we have this problem is we have TOTAL DROSS entering parliament, rubbish salaries, an awful culture, ridiculous hours, and horrific abuse.
Look at the quality of politicians in the 1970s and 1980s, who'd had solid business, economic and leadership careers (real ones) and compare to now.
Comments
5 minutes before a new header is posted, TSE or whoever's in charge at the time posts a 5 minute warning in bold on the old thread. Would help to moderate the curse of the new thread and reduce the FPT count.
Maybe the Green Party of Canada can try and get Lorna Slater back. Please.
Gulf of Mexico to become Gulf of America
Substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada
No windmills to be built
How Rachel Reeves snuffed out Britain’s house price boom
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/property/house-prices/how-rachel-reeves-end-britain-house-price-boom/
Edit: Beaten to it by @Northern_Al .
The Donald Quixote?
It is in UKs interest to negotiate a deal with the US
It raises an interesting question. If the US does invade Greenland can Denmark invoke NATO Article 5?
The agribusiness lobby is way too strong and we should not accept the changes they would insist on
American food is fundamentally unhealthy except at the very top end.
Musk wants Greenland's metal deposits, and a lot of the MAGA would also genuinely love to see parts of Canada and Mexico incorporated.
(edit - I'm slow today.)
A trade deal with the US makes the UK beholden to Trump, a man who does not believe that deals are worth the paper they are written on. Just ask Canada and Mexico.
The device is powered by an Nvidia GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip, which houses separate, linked components on a single chip to reduce the time it takes to move data between them.
The superchip features an Nvidia Blackwell graphics card and an Nvidia Grace processor, packaged with 128 gigabytes of memory and 4 terabytes of SSD storage.
https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1876484153774158308
Decent bang for the buck.
Considering it's a 0.2% drop, and we had a 0.9% drop as recently as March, or that last month was a 1.2% rise, it appears to be a nothing stat right now.
What a precious gift of goodwill Trump is.
Captain America, with a golden heart.
In any case, Canada and Mexico negotiated a deal with Trump, which he is now royally ratting on. There is zero value in any deal with Trump as he is a fundamentally unreliable partner and if we do a deal it will, on balance, tie us closer to the US and so make us more vulnerable to their policies.
I cannot believe I fell for the govt in waiting schtick. Mugged off doesn’t even enter into it.
This transforms a two-week manual process into real-time monitoring across thousands of kilometers of North American coastline, where conservation teams can now instantly redirect ships, pause drilling operations, and adjust fishing zones to protect whales..
https://x.com/btibor91/status/1876630816199217208
The Atlantic and the Pacific can't both be the American Ocean.
Luckily there is polling to tell us how people think her and the government are doing at the moment. And there is the markets.
It was always a bollocks analogy.
As in his case, there's a good chance of it being both.
But. The US is the bedrock of Nato. Without it, Nato changes hugely and arguably becomes something else entirely.
What we should foresee and prepare for is Trump demanding Greenland, and other things like that, in return for continued American membership. At that point, we have to tell Trump where to go.
This does not make Trump’s threats any saner, they are quite funny, in a dark way. If he’s got any good advisors they should tell him he doesn’t even need to invade - from what I know of Greenland (and I’ve been there) they want to cut ties with Denmark. And despite what the Greenlandic leader says, if America offered a sweet enough deal they would join the USA as a kind of cold Puerto Rico, but way more valuable
There are only 60,000 Greenlanders. Trump could literally offer them each $100,000 = $6bn. That’s nothing to the USA
They would take it. Heck, I reckon most Brits would take it
But I don't see a UK-US trade deal without the UK being obliged to accept American agricultural produce and standards, and I don't see parliament - pressured by the public - being willing to accept that. Particularly with a majority of Labour MPs.
"America needs living space.. :
He is changing the world order with far reaching consequences
He said that if all the hostages are not released by his auguration 'all hell will break out'
He is demanding 5% NATO spending, is to implement substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and he was very disparaging about the EU no doubt also with the intention of imposing tariffs
He has scrapped Bidens ban on oil and gas exploration together with a ban on building wind farms
It seems he is likely to meet Putin very soon and it looks like he will demand peace within 6 months
He wants to take back the Panama canal even by force and has Greenland in his sights
Forget the EU leading it.
I assume the states will just tell him to FO, including a number of red states (like Texas) that have vast and growing wind resources.
https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1876681621426065625
it induces, in me, a kind of existential dread for my nation. We are governed, and have been governed for a long while, by outright morons. This applies to the Tories as much as Labour, indeed it applies to the entire governing classes - civil servants, quangos, legal system, judges, the whole shebang. Possibly the monarchy as well
Sweep it all away
There must be literally millions of posts being made on UK internet forums every single day.
Whilst numerous posts might be deemed to possibly be in breach of a strict interpretation of the Act it is surely completely impractial to think that the police (and in turn CPS) are going to pursue anything other than the very most serious posts - ie posts in connection with things like suicide.
Otherwise where on earth would they start?
I'm not saying I agree with the Act - I don't and I agree with most of the comments posted yesterday. But from a practical point of view I can't see it having any effect on anything which could be considered normal political debate.
Oh, and an annual stipend for 99 years.
Fundamentally, I want that choice, not for products to be totally excluded from the market for me; I'll decide thanks.
We make ethical choices as consumers all the time.
However the Greenlandics don’t like it. They grudgingly accept it for now (coz subsidies) but they dislike the patronising colonial aspect - Danes flying in to do the important jobs coz the locals are too drunk and suicidal
A clever American offer could easily win them over, I suspect. American citizenship, lots of money, protection by the American military. Quite persuasive
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, has taken on a campaign to get the ship operational again, asking the Ministry of Defence about the cost of repairing it.
There is just one problem: the boat is a fictional frigate seen in the 1997 James Bond film Tomorrow Never Dies.
Cartlidge and his party accidentally mixed up the boat with the HMS Northumberland, the Type 23 frigate that is due to be retired this year because of structural damage.
In a written ministerial question in November last year, the Conservative MP for South Suffolk asked John Healey, the defence secretary, “what estimate he has made of the cost of repairing structural damage to HMS Devonshire”.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/shadow-defence-secretary-mixes-up-james-bond-ship-with-real-one-nv8s589m5
As I remember, the Faroese want independence the most.
Wasn't this one of Wilson's things though? UK needed a proper economic plan. He even set up separate department to plan economics as the Treasury couldn't be trusted to do the job.
Which was a crap deal, but we were desperate.
And those 50 x obsolete destroyers I think we'd all mothballed by 1948, although some were reactivated for Korea.
🎵 Ode to joy 🎵
The reason we have this problem is we have TOTAL DROSS entering parliament, rubbish salaries, an awful culture, ridiculous hours, and horrific abuse.
Look at the quality of politicians in the 1970s and 1980s, who'd had solid business, economic and leadership careers (real ones) and compare to now.