Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The changing face of the electorate – politicalbetting.com

245

Comments

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    Re: votes at 16. I teach too many 16 year olds to think giving them the vote is a good idea.

    To be fair though, how many adults probably shouldn't have the vote either?

    I mean, would the world be significantly worse off if Amanda Spielman, Dominic Cummings and Nick Gibb were disenfranchised?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    edited December 23
    FF43 said:

    pm215 said:

    Of course they are not doing this for perceived political advantage.

    Will it be condemned on here by those who were so opposed to Voter ID measures?

    Well, I was opposed to Voter Photo ID, and I'm opposed to this. ;)
    Which is entirely reasonable - I disagree but your position is consistent in not liking change 😉

    It’s the hypocritics I dislike
    I don't have a strong view on the voting age question, but I think you can be consistent in both:

    * disapproving of voter photo ID because it reduces the number of people who vote
    * approving of reducing the voting age because it increases the number of people who vote

    I think I would file changing the voting age in the same bucket as the assisted dying bill: probably on balance reasonable, but I would really rather the government kept its focus on more important things. At least this one was in the manifesto...

    TBH I'd far rather they sorted out the fiasco that is photo ID. If you can't be trusted to drive a car at 16 why should you be trusted to vote?
    I see votes at 16 as an opportunity. Voting like many things is a learnt activity and allowing it while at school means it can be brought in with other learning. The age threshold is otherwise arbitrary with no right or wrong whether it's 16 or 18.

    Votes at 16 do seem to get strong pushback on here, but in Scotland we do already have votes at 16 with no controversy at all.
    Not just on here, it was the most unpopular policy in Labour's manifesto by quite some margin:

    https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/6-10-britons-think-labour-manifesto-represents-positive-change-britain

    More unpopular than national service.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,914
    ydoethur said:

    Re: votes at 16. I teach too many 16 year olds to think giving them the vote is a good idea.

    To be fair though, how many adults probably shouldn't have the vote either?

    I mean, would the world be significantly worse off if Amanda Spielman, Dominic Cummings and Nick Gibb were disenfranchised?
    Anyone who has ever sung "Oh Jeremy Corbyn" or bought Johnson's "Unleashed" book should undoubtedly be disenfranchised. No appeal.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,387
    Roger said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    It's like a 12 year old running around a classroom scribbling "FUCK" on a blackboard. Just too boring. I don't even read the site if I see him here. I'm sure he's attention seeking because he's lonely but there are more deserving charities this time of year
    Merry Christmas Roger! Which of your mansions are you spending it at this year? :D
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032
    ydoethur said:

    If they are old enough to vote at 16, why are they not old enough to marry* or leave school?

    *Yes, I know the law is different in Scotland.

    I left school at 16. I was bored and someone mentioned grants if I went on to this weird University thing.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 5,067
    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,080
    Taz said:

    Pulpstar said:

    16 and 17 year old girls probably go green with the boys voting reform lol

    How many will even bother voting.
    I suspect anyone about to be stung in the tens of thousands for university fees might be inclined to.
    Which actually changes my mind. I think I'm now in favour of votes for 16 year olds.

    I'm still vaguely tempted by votes for anyone over the age of 6 months - but your parents exercise it for you up to the age of 16.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987
    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    RobD said:

    Ugh, votes for children.

    I'm resigned to it happening, though I don't agree with it, not least because we generally infantilise adults more now rather than empower children. But it is a pretty simple change to make, so I'm not surprised it would be done quickly.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    So much principal in foreign affairs

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,680

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    Hang on
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 5,067
    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032
    kinabalu said:

    Of course they are not doing this for perceived political advantage.

    Will it be condemned on here by those who were so opposed to Voter ID measures?

    One increases participation the other dampens it. So you can perfectly well support one and not the other with a straight face and an unblemished heart.
    Are we talking about the gate Keepers scene in the Scottish play or something else?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,080
    HYUFD said:

    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either

    If they are enfranchised, they are at least able to influence this state of affairs. Perhaps some party might see votes among the new franchisees in lowering the drinking age.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987
    edited December 23
    kinabalu said:

    CatMan said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is imbecility, but imbecility that we have to take seriously.

    Trump says US owning Greenland ‘absolute necessity’
    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5053319-trump-greenland-purchase/

    Greenland might say Yes
    It’s not up to them. It’s up to people on random bulletin boards.
    Hah

    If Trump offered the UK American statehood, and we were allowed to swerve American gun law, avoid the American healthcare system, and find some compromise over the monarchy where we get to keep it but they don't have to adopt it, I would absolutely say Yes

    Probably I'm alone in PB. on that
    I will never get over the propensity of the rich to be patriotic to every country but their own. What was the point of Brexit if the first thing you do is to kneel to another country? First it was CANZUK, now it's USA.
    There's a sense in which CANZ and the USA are not really foreign but part of Greater Britain.
    Yes. And that sense was "we used to be close in the past but aren't any more". There is a difference between alliances and identities, and the British aren't American, Canadian, whatevs. May and Goodhart were correct about "citizens of nowhere", but since when was being right an advantage in politics?
    On the other hand, the growth of the internet means that we have never been closer. We share memes on social media and are part of the same political conversation. In addition the rise of China means that we will inevitably be pushed closer together geopolitically as well.
    The UK becoming part of the USA would guarantee 70 or so electoral college votes for the Democrats. Let's do it!
    Would have kept Trump out. I think I'd give up our sovereignty for that. Just as a temporary emergency measure you understand.
    No, Trump would still have won 312 to 296 for Harris even with 70 UK EC votes. It would have needed Canada or Australia/NZ too to defeat him
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032
    Cookie said:

    Taz said:

    Pulpstar said:

    16 and 17 year old girls probably go green with the boys voting reform lol

    How many will even bother voting.
    I suspect anyone about to be stung in the tens of thousands for university fees might be inclined to.
    Which actually changes my mind. I think I'm now in favour of votes for 16 year olds.

    I'm still vaguely tempted by votes for anyone over the age of 6 months - but your parents exercise it for you up to the age of 16.
    My 16 year old daughter was one of the best canvassers on my team for Better Together. She’s now a newly qualified lawyer funnily enough.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769
    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    CatMan said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is imbecility, but imbecility that we have to take seriously.

    Trump says US owning Greenland ‘absolute necessity’
    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5053319-trump-greenland-purchase/

    Greenland might say Yes
    It’s not up to them. It’s up to people on random bulletin boards.
    Hah

    If Trump offered the UK American statehood, and we were allowed to swerve American gun law, avoid the American healthcare system, and find some compromise over the monarchy where we get to keep it but they don't have to adopt it, I would absolutely say Yes

    Probably I'm alone in PB. on that
    I will never get over the propensity of the rich to be patriotic to every country but their own. What was the point of Brexit if the first thing you do is to kneel to another country? First it was CANZUK, now it's USA.
    There's a sense in which CANZ and the USA are not really foreign but part of Greater Britain.
    Yes. And that sense was "we used to be close in the past but aren't any more". There is a difference between alliances and identities, and the British aren't American, Canadian, whatevs. May and Goodhart were correct about "citizens of nowhere", but since when was being right an advantage in politics?
    On the other hand, the growth of the internet means that we have never been closer. We share memes on social media and are part of the same political conversation. In addition the rise of China means that we will inevitably be pushed closer together geopolitically as well.
    The UK becoming part of the USA would guarantee 70 or so electoral college votes for the Democrats. Let's do it!
    Would have kept Trump out. I think I'd give up our sovereignty for that. Just as a temporary emergency measure you understand.
    No, Trump would still have won 312 to 296 for Harris even with 70 UK EC votes. It would have needed Canada or Australia/NZ too to defeat him
    Not quite correct. The other votes would be redistributed by population so that 312 would reduce.

    It would in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland create three small states that would be very left wing, reducing the bias in the Electoral College.

    Assuming there were eight senators for the Dems, as well, that would shake up the Senate.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,246
    RobD said:

    FF43 said:

    pm215 said:

    Of course they are not doing this for perceived political advantage.

    Will it be condemned on here by those who were so opposed to Voter ID measures?

    Well, I was opposed to Voter Photo ID, and I'm opposed to this. ;)
    Which is entirely reasonable - I disagree but your position is consistent in not liking change 😉

    It’s the hypocritics I dislike
    I don't have a strong view on the voting age question, but I think you can be consistent in both:

    * disapproving of voter photo ID because it reduces the number of people who vote
    * approving of reducing the voting age because it increases the number of people who vote

    I think I would file changing the voting age in the same bucket as the assisted dying bill: probably on balance reasonable, but I would really rather the government kept its focus on more important things. At least this one was in the manifesto...

    TBH I'd far rather they sorted out the fiasco that is photo ID. If you can't be trusted to drive a car at 16 why should you be trusted to vote?
    I see votes at 16 as an opportunity. Voting like many things is a learnt activity and allowing it while at school means it can be brought in with other learning. The age threshold is otherwise arbitrary with no right or wrong whether it's 16 or 18.

    Votes at 16 do seem to get strong pushback on here, but in Scotland we do already have votes at 16 with no controversy at all.
    Not just on here, it was the most unpopular policy in Labour's manifesto by quite some margin:

    https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/6-10-britons-think-labour-manifesto-represents-positive-change-britain

    More unpopular than national service.
    Indeed. It is completely baffling that an arbitrary age limit should generate such a visceral reaction, especially when we already have voting at 16 in Scotland and no-one gives it a second thought.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    edited December 23
    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,228
    Essexit said:

    Trusted to work, pay taxes, serve in the armed forces, soon to vote as well, but a lifetime ban on buying cigarettes. Batty.

    If we link the franchise to the right to buy tabs, democracy will end in 90 years time.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,393
    FF43 said:

    RobD said:

    FF43 said:

    pm215 said:

    Of course they are not doing this for perceived political advantage.

    Will it be condemned on here by those who were so opposed to Voter ID measures?

    Well, I was opposed to Voter Photo ID, and I'm opposed to this. ;)
    Which is entirely reasonable - I disagree but your position is consistent in not liking change 😉

    It’s the hypocritics I dislike
    I don't have a strong view on the voting age question, but I think you can be consistent in both:

    * disapproving of voter photo ID because it reduces the number of people who vote
    * approving of reducing the voting age because it increases the number of people who vote

    I think I would file changing the voting age in the same bucket as the assisted dying bill: probably on balance reasonable, but I would really rather the government kept its focus on more important things. At least this one was in the manifesto...

    TBH I'd far rather they sorted out the fiasco that is photo ID. If you can't be trusted to drive a car at 16 why should you be trusted to vote?
    I see votes at 16 as an opportunity. Voting like many things is a learnt activity and allowing it while at school means it can be brought in with other learning. The age threshold is otherwise arbitrary with no right or wrong whether it's 16 or 18.

    Votes at 16 do seem to get strong pushback on here, but in Scotland we do already have votes at 16 with no controversy at all.
    Not just on here, it was the most unpopular policy in Labour's manifesto by quite some margin:

    https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/6-10-britons-think-labour-manifesto-represents-positive-change-britain

    More unpopular than national service.
    Indeed. It is completely baffling that an arbitrary age limit should generate such a visceral reaction, especially when we already have voting at 16 in Scotland and no-one gives it a second thought.
    Absolutely. Also in Wales. Though NI seems to be 17?
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,983
    edited December 23
    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    It's like a 12 year old running around a classroom scribbling "FUCK" on a blackboard. Just too boring. I don't even read the site if I see him here. I'm sure he's attention seeking because he's lonely but there are more deserving charities this time of year
    Merry Christmas Roger! Which of your mansions are you spending it at this year? :D
    Merry christmas!

    I don't have a mansion or a yacht. But on the off chance you actually wanted to know-and you are one of my favourite Toryish posters-I'm going to be in the south of France in the New Year in the hope I'll be able to walk the streets without wellingtons.

    How about you?
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,671

    My own personal view is that if you're not old enough to be punished for a crime, you're not old enough to vote.

    It's all a bit more phased than that. Criminal responsibility is 10. 18-25yos are treated as adults in court, but differently in the prisons system, and 25+ is "adult" all round.

    https://www.gov.uk/age-of-criminal-responsibility
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,983
    DavidL said:

    Re: votes at 16. I teach too many 16 year olds to think giving them the vote is a good idea.

    You should try speaking to the rest of the electorate.
    Sometimes this site can be really irritating but occasionally you come across a gem!
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937

    Nigelb said:

    Key driver of Honda + Nissan: National security.

    "Ministry officials noted that the government’s wider mission included the protection of Japan’s industrial base, meaning it broadly supported a deal that appeared to preserve that."

    Honda and Nissan unveil plan for $58bn merger by 2026

    https://x.com/dunne_insights/status/1871216111397540230

    Hmm, that would presumably include Mitsubishi too. The ghost of British Leyland is waving fron the hard shoulder.
    AIUI Mitsubishi are already effectively part of Nissan-Renault-Mitsubishi (part ownership), but perhaps that's what you meant?
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937
    edited December 23
    ..
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,914
    edited December 23

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    Hang on, that's a double bubble blow to the Tories and Reform. How about we reach a compromise for anxious PBers? Reducing the franchise age to 16 for Tory/Reform voting teenagers and maximisising it to 80 just for non Tory/Reform octogenarian voters.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    Hang on, that's a double bubble blow to the Tories and Reform. How about we reach a compromise for anxious PBers? Reducing the franchise age to 16 for Tory/Reform voting teenagers and maximisising it to 80 just for non Tory/Reform octogenarian voters.
    Don't. That's roughly how Salisbury shafted Gladstone over the 1884-1885 Reform Acts.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869


    Why are the media and governing classes content to maintain the sort of polite silence that greets a great aunt's post prandial fart when Rachel 'Stagflation' Reeves' budget has now elevated bond yields beyond those seen at the height of the LDI crisis? Where are the calls for an urgent course correction? Where are the calls for Reeves to go? Where are the calls for Starmer to go?

    The parallels with 2022 are glaring. Back then, Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-Budget sparked a media feeding frenzy. The BBC, politicians, and pundits spent weeks pinning the blame squarely on Truss, using the spike in bond yields as evidence of incompetence and recklessness. And yet today, when bond yields are even higher and the UK is paying the steepest premium in decades, the media is curiously silent.

    https://conservativepost.co.uk/uk-bond-yields-soar-past-2022-crisis-levels-so-wheres-the-same-media-outrage-for-labour-that-liz-truss-faced/
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    Not only that.

    I'd send a gunboat.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711
    Roger said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    It's like a 12 year old running around a classroom scribbling "FUCK" on a blackboard. Just too boring. I don't even read the site if I see him here. I'm sure he's attention seeking because he's lonely but there are more deserving charities this time of year
    Merry Christmas Roger! Which of your mansions are you spending it at this year? :D
    Merry christmas!

    I don't have a mansion or a yacht. But on the off chance you actually wanted to know-and you are one of my favourite Toryish posters-I'm going to be in the south of France in the New Year in the hope I'll be able to walk the streets without wellingtons.

    How about you?
    If you were there in 1814 you'd be able to walk the streets with Wellington.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937
    mwadams said:

    My own personal view is that if you're not old enough to be punished for a crime, you're not old enough to vote.

    It's all a bit more phased than that. Criminal responsibility is 10. 18-25yos are treated as adults in court, but differently in the prisons system, and 25+ is "adult" all round.

    https://www.gov.uk/age-of-criminal-responsibility
    That's 10 years higher than the minimum age for getting married in California, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Mississippi !
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_age_in_the_United_States
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    Not only that.

    I'd send a gunboat.
    If we could find one that works.

    Mind you, they've got Sir Surrender's number. Perhaps we should thank them for highlighting what a ghastly shower his Government is.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,137
    Politics UK
    @PolitlcsUK
    ·
    3h
    🚨 NEW: No 10 has confirmed Keir Starmer is going on first holiday abroad since taking office over the Christmas break


    ===

    Let's hope he has a proper rest and comes back refreshed.

  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,730

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    Not only that.

    I'd send a gunboat.
    What would the French do?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032

    Politics UK
    @PolitlcsUK
    ·
    3h
    🚨 NEW: No 10 has confirmed Keir Starmer is going on first holiday abroad since taking office over the Christmas break


    ===

    Let's hope he has a proper rest and comes back refreshed.

    I trust that he is going somewhere warm, just like his song predicted.
  • AnthonyTAnthonyT Posts: 94

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    What's happened?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,148
    mwadams said:

    My own personal view is that if you're not old enough to be punished for a crime, you're not old enough to vote.

    It's all a bit more phased than that. Criminal responsibility is 10. 18-25yos are treated as adults in court, but differently in the prisons system, and 25+ is "adult" all round.

    https://www.gov.uk/age-of-criminal-responsibility
    https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/sentencing-council-set-for-u-turn-on-under-25-guideline-after-rapist-spared-jail


    In 2021, the sentencing council suggested changes to the treatment of under-25s. Lady Dorrian, the council’s chairwoman, said: “We understand that cognitive maturity does not develop fully until one’s mid-20s and are persuaded that there is a case for sentencing young adults under the age of 25 on a different basis to older people.”


    Should we disenfranchise the under 25s?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    ...

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    Not only that.

    I'd send a gunboat.
    What would the French do?
    Sadly the area is far too watery to make running away a feasible medium term option.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    AnthonyT said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    What's happened?
    On the naughty step for mentioning AI too much.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,730
    edited December 23

    ...

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    Not only that.

    I'd send a gunboat.
    What would the French do?
    Sadly the area is far too watery to make running away a feasible medium term option.
    Going by current events they'd turn it into a shanty town and then tell the inhabitants how much worse it would be if they weren't part of France.

    That or use it for a bit of nuclear testing.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769
    edited December 23
    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
  • ydoethur said:

    Re: votes at 16. I teach too many 16 year olds to think giving them the vote is a good idea.

    To be fair though, how many adults probably shouldn't have the vote either?

    I mean, would the world be significantly worse off if Amanda Spielman, Dominic Cummings and Nick Gibb were disenfranchised?
    I can’t disagree with that tbh.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,260
    The leaders of @eurofighter and #NETMA (the @NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency) today signed the contract for up to 24 @ItalianAirForce Eurofighters in #Rome. The announcement comes at a strategically important time for the Eurofighter programme and follows the contract signing last Friday (20 December) for 25 Eurofighters for the Spanish Air Force. The new Italian Eurofighter Typhoon jets will replace Italian Tranche 1 versions that are currently in service.
    https://x.com/Leonardo_live/status/1871239691758104867
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,913
    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    No Moira these poor jokes please.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769
    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    No Moira these poor jokes please.
    Where are these puns goring?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,228
    RobD said:

    AnthonyT said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    What's happened?
    On the naughty step for mentioning AI too much.
    To be fair, he also got around a dozen other posters to spam the site with inane AI drivel for most of the day.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987

    Politics UK
    @PolitlcsUK
    ·
    3h
    🚨 NEW: No 10 has confirmed Keir Starmer is going on first holiday abroad since taking office over the Christmas break


    ===

    Let's hope he has a proper rest and comes back refreshed.

    Let's hope he stays there permanently
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,144

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either

    Yep. I would suggest that the only way it would be aceptable is if we decided on a single age of adulthood for everything. So give children the vote but also allow them to serve on juries, drink, get married without parental consent, drive and serve on the front line in wars. Why should we trust them with the future of the country if we don't trust them with alcohol, cars or the fate of the accused.
    Though with a 5 year parliament they will be 23 at the end of it, while a million older voters will have met their maker before the parliament is through.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    RobD said:

    AnthonyT said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    What's happened?
    On the naughty step for mentioning AI too much.
    To be fair, he also got around a dozen other posters to spam the site with inane AI drivel for most of the day.
    Could have been worse, at least he's not doing any more crazy non-translations into Welsh.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,137

    RobD said:

    AnthonyT said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    What's happened?
    On the naughty step for mentioning AI too much.
    To be fair, he also got around a dozen other posters to spam the site with inane AI drivel for most of the day.
    Leon banned?

    The last post I saw said as he is about to travel to Cornwell for xmas he will not the trouble the moderators with anymore AI whitter.

    I guess he did not follow through?
  • Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either

    Yep. I would suggest that the only way it would be aceptable is if we decided on a single age of adulthood for everything. So give children the vote but also allow them to serve on juries, drink, get married without parental consent, drive and serve on the front line in wars. Why should we trust them with the future of the country if we don't trust them with alcohol, cars or the fate of the accused.
    Though with a 5 year parliament they will be 23 at the end of it, while a million older voters will have met their maker before the parliament is through.
    That’s 18 year olds. 16 year olds will be 21.
  • Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either

    Yep. I would suggest that the only way it would be aceptable is if we decided on a single age of adulthood for everything. So give children the vote but also allow them to serve on juries, drink, get married without parental consent, drive and serve on the front line in wars. Why should we trust them with the future of the country if we don't trust them with alcohol, cars or the fate of the accused.
    Though with a 5 year parliament they will be 23 at the end of it, while a million older voters will have met their maker before the parliament is through.
    A point that has no relevance to what I was saying.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,913
    ydoethur said:

    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    No Moira these poor jokes please.
    Where are these puns goring?
    It's a shame that there are no functional Arch-Bishops these days - otherwise, given our similar humour levels he could Marius.


    (It's amazing that Moira was listed 3rd on the poster isn't it)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987
    edited December 23
    ydoethur said:

    HYUFD said:

    kinabalu said:

    CatMan said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    Leon said:

    Taz said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is imbecility, but imbecility that we have to take seriously.

    Trump says US owning Greenland ‘absolute necessity’
    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5053319-trump-greenland-purchase/

    Greenland might say Yes
    It’s not up to them. It’s up to people on random bulletin boards.
    Hah

    If Trump offered the UK American statehood, and we were allowed to swerve American gun law, avoid the American healthcare system, and find some compromise over the monarchy where we get to keep it but they don't have to adopt it, I would absolutely say Yes

    Probably I'm alone in PB. on that
    I will never get over the propensity of the rich to be patriotic to every country but their own. What was the point of Brexit if the first thing you do is to kneel to another country? First it was CANZUK, now it's USA.
    There's a sense in which CANZ and the USA are not really foreign but part of Greater Britain.
    Yes. And that sense was "we used to be close in the past but aren't any more". There is a difference between alliances and identities, and the British aren't American, Canadian, whatevs. May and Goodhart were correct about "citizens of nowhere", but since when was being right an advantage in politics?
    On the other hand, the growth of the internet means that we have never been closer. We share memes on social media and are part of the same political conversation. In addition the rise of China means that we will inevitably be pushed closer together geopolitically as well.
    The UK becoming part of the USA would guarantee 70 or so electoral college votes for the Democrats. Let's do it!
    Would have kept Trump out. I think I'd give up our sovereignty for that. Just as a temporary emergency measure you understand.
    No, Trump would still have won 312 to 296 for Harris even with 70 UK EC votes. It would have needed Canada or Australia/NZ too to defeat him
    Not quite correct. The other votes would be redistributed by population so that 312 would reduce.

    It would in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland create three small states that would be very left wing, reducing the bias in the Electoral College.

    Assuming there were eight senators for the Dems, as well, that would shake up the Senate.
    Northern Ireland isn't leftwing, it is arguably more rightwing than GB on cultural matters and certainly more socially conservative than many coastal US states. Wales voted for Brexit. Scotland is more left liberal but even there its rural areas less so
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,302
    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either

    Yep. I would suggest that the only way it would be aceptable is if we decided on a single age of adulthood for everything. So give children the vote but also allow them to serve on juries, drink, get married without parental consent, drive and serve on the front line in wars. Why should we trust them with the future of the country if we don't trust them with alcohol, cars or the fate of the accused.
    Though with a 5 year parliament they will be 23 at the end of it, while a million older voters will have met their maker before the parliament is through.
    As an innovation, maybe people should be able to leave a vote in their will that would apply at the following general election.
  • RobD said:

    AnthonyT said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    What's happened?
    On the naughty step for mentioning AI too much.
    To be fair, he also got around a dozen other posters to spam the site with inane AI drivel for most of the day.
    You mean he dared to stimulate a discussion on a point fo interest to at least a dozen others posters on here? The devil!
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 8,955
    edited December 23

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    Top and tail based on the life expectancy. So 16 - 70.

    (You have 16 years left on average if you make it to 70).
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769
    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    No Moira these poor jokes please.
    Where are these puns goring?
    It's a shame that there are no functional Arch-Bishops these days - otherwise, given our similar humour levels he could Marius.


    (It's amazing that Moira was listed 3rd on the poster isn't it)
    It was the Anton-ym of the reality.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,913
    ydoethur said:

    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    No Moira these poor jokes please.
    Where are these puns goring?
    It's a shame that there are no functional Arch-Bishops these days - otherwise, given our similar humour levels he could Marius.


    (It's amazing that Moira was listed 3rd on the poster isn't it)
    It was the Anton-ym of the reality.
    I'm tempted to stop this discussion given it's merely of Acad-Emeric interest. Surely you'll throw the Powell in?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,144
    edited December 23
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
    Mauritius is a lovely country, peaceful, prosperous, comfortably multicultural, democratic and full of free enterprise. Indeed you could make a case for it as the most successful African economy since independence. It was impoverished then.

    It's not our poodle any more which is perhaps the PB Blimps resent it so much.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769
    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    Omnium said:

    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    No Moira these poor jokes please.
    Where are these puns goring?
    It's a shame that there are no functional Arch-Bishops these days - otherwise, given our similar humour levels he could Marius.


    (It's amazing that Moira was listed 3rd on the poster isn't it)
    It was the Anton-ym of the reality.
    I'm tempted to stop this discussion given it's merely of Acad-Emeric interest. Surely you'll throw the Powell in?
    I will if you'll follow me through the Archer way marked 'Exit.'
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,656
    Nigelb said:

    The leaders of @eurofighter and #NETMA (the @NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency) today signed the contract for up to 24 @ItalianAirForce Eurofighters in #Rome. The announcement comes at a strategically important time for the Eurofighter programme and follows the contract signing last Friday (20 December) for 25 Eurofighters for the Spanish Air Force. The new Italian Eurofighter Typhoon jets will replace Italian Tranche 1 versions that are currently in service.
    https://x.com/Leonardo_live/status/1871239691758104867

    The tranche 1 Eurofighters aren't *that* old - surely their airframes are serviceable, and their avionics could be upgraded to the latest version.

    There are still some Block 15 (early 80s) F-16s in use, albeit mostly for training purposes. And I believe Israel still flies some of the very earliest F-16s made.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 10,005
    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    It's like a 12 year old running around a classroom scribbling "FUCK" on a blackboard. Just too boring. I don't even read the site if I see him here. I'm sure he's attention seeking because he's lonely but there are more deserving charities this time of year
    Merry Christmas Roger! Which of your mansions are you spending it at this year? :D
    At least leon has never supported child sodomy rapists
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,477

    In the latest on good reasons for cash..

    Blanche's bonus Christmas cash tips total is up to £340, with a day to go. Three more people today checked that I'm working tomorrow so that they can give me my card; it's never just a card

    I've also been given two boxes of biscuits, five boxes of chocolates, two bottles of wine and a pack of six bottles of beer

    One very kind family gave me SIXTY QUID! I think that their lovely labrador, Puddles, who I make a fuss of every day, must have put in a good word for me

    We give our lovely postie a bottle of wine each year. In return, he is jolly diligent, even using his sleuthing abilities to track down for us a coffee machine that had been delivered to the wrong address (the recipient had just kept it in her hall for a fortnight).
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,656
    Pagan2 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    It's like a 12 year old running around a classroom scribbling "FUCK" on a blackboard. Just too boring. I don't even read the site if I see him here. I'm sure he's attention seeking because he's lonely but there are more deserving charities this time of year
    Merry Christmas Roger! Which of your mansions are you spending it at this year? :D
    At least leon has never supported child sodomy rapists
    How do you know?
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 10,005
    rcs1000 said:

    Pagan2 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    So I've been away a couple of days and national treasure Leon is now no more. I miss all the excitement.

    It's like a 12 year old running around a classroom scribbling "FUCK" on a blackboard. Just too boring. I don't even read the site if I see him here. I'm sure he's attention seeking because he's lonely but there are more deserving charities this time of year
    Merry Christmas Roger! Which of your mansions are you spending it at this year? :D
    At least leon has never supported child sodomy rapists
    How do you know?
    Well he hasn't posted it here if he has, unlike roger
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937
    edited December 23
    A niche piece. Novara Media visits Ashfield before the General Election - recommended. 25 minutes total, and I think a heavily skewed narrative. The algorithm only threw this at me now.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQB_IpQY3-8

    Snippets:

    80+ year old Grannies ranting about immigration, and any young people won't talk to them. Novara's reporter visited from from about mid-morning to mid-afternoon to just a small area in two town centres on a weekday, when 90% of people around will be pensioners drinking tea or drifters / possibly crims, and everyone else will most likely be at work :wink:.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQB_IpQY3-8&t=617s

    Novara discovers Ashfield's Green Voter.
    https://youtu.be/eQB_IpQY3-8?t=1262

    Novara discovers Ashfield's (imo: paper) lesser spotted Conservative Candidate (a Councillor from 25 miles away) . Rwanda will fix it !
    https://youtu.be/eQB_IpQY3-8?t=536

    Novara meets Jason Zadrozny (follows previous). Fair representation of his current positioning, for those who ahve never seen him performing.
    https://youtu.be/eQB_IpQY3-8?t=617

    Novara reporter, summarising. This is OK and insightful but reflects imo the narrative Novara wish to create. It's clear to me that they have not really done their homework - like most other media I have seen reporting.
    https://youtu.be/eQB_IpQY3-8?t=1401

    I think they came looking for a particular story of 'left behind, declining Reform constituency;. Whilst a balanced story would have also looked, for example, into the local companies growing since mining decline providing hundreds of jobs each.

    I think the real warning here is how easy it is to play the electorate. Scare narratives about immigration really take route either where a) "Different colour people" presence feels overwhelming or b) "Different colour people" are hardly present, so there is no personal experience to refute the narrative. That's the wedge that RefUK, and some elements of the Tories, are trying to drive.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,106
    In memoriam...

    @ashleyesqueda.com‬

    I wish more people understood that ChatGPT and all its brethren are exactly the same as fortune tellers or spirit mediums throughout history: they spit out generic ideas and guesses based on information you offer, and if they happen to hit pay dirt, you're a lifelong convert.

    https://bsky.app/profile/ashleyesqueda.com/post/3ldygj3otre2e
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,477
    That one's more than a fortnight old.
    I'm sure Labour will be under 5% by now.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,302

    That one's more than a fortnight old.
    I'm sure Labour will be under 5% by now.
    A Labour/Reform crossover in Scotland would be pretty seismic.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987
    edited December 23
    Labour down 15% on July, SNP up just 1%, Tories up just 2%, LDs down 1%.

    Big gainers on that poll in Scotland are Reform up 8% to 15%. More now back Reform in Scotland than the 12% who voted UKIP UK wide in 2015
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 10,913
    Farage at 15% is astonishing there. Scotland, Farage, it makes no sense. Mind you they do allow the orange fool to flatten and make comedy out of some acres of their country too.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987
    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
    Mauritius is a lovely country, peaceful, prosperous, comfortably multicultural, democratic and full of free enterprise. Indeed you could make a case for it as the most successful African economy since independence. It was impoverished then.

    It's not our poodle any more which is perhaps the PB Blimps resent it so much.
    Doesn't allow Chagos Islanders independence though
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,468
    edited December 23
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
    That's probably a decent summary of any country with a coastline.
  • Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt it makes much difference electorally, 18 year olds have a low turnout at election time and 16 year olds will likely have an even lower one.

    Given 16 year olds cannot drive, watch an 18 film or play an 18 rated computer game, be interviewed by police without an appropriate adult present, be on a jury, buy and drink alcohol at a bar or get married without parental consent not sure why they should be entitled to vote on who their government is yet. Given 16 and 17 year olds can't stand as an MP or councillor yet not sure why they should be voting for them yet either

    Yep. I would suggest that the only way it would be aceptable is if we decided on a single age of adulthood for everything. So give children the vote but also allow them to serve on juries, drink, get married without parental consent, drive and serve on the front line in wars. Why should we trust them with the future of the country if we don't trust them with alcohol, cars or the fate of the accused.
    Though with a 5 year parliament they will be 23 at the end of it, while a million older voters will have met their maker before the parliament is through.
    A point that has no relevance to what I was saying.
    As true as it might be, it is rather unpleasant thing to say not least because both myself and @OldKingCole have health issues and are grateful for each and every precious day

  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,148
    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    The leaders of @eurofighter and #NETMA (the @NATO Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency) today signed the contract for up to 24 @ItalianAirForce Eurofighters in #Rome. The announcement comes at a strategically important time for the Eurofighter programme and follows the contract signing last Friday (20 December) for 25 Eurofighters for the Spanish Air Force. The new Italian Eurofighter Typhoon jets will replace Italian Tranche 1 versions that are currently in service.
    https://x.com/Leonardo_live/status/1871239691758104867

    The tranche 1 Eurofighters aren't *that* old - surely their airframes are serviceable, and their avionics could be upgraded to the latest version.

    There are still some Block 15 (early 80s) F-16s in use, albeit mostly for training purposes. And I believe Israel still flies some of the very earliest F-16s made.
    Fundamental structural issues in the Tranche 1 prevent them receiving various upgrades. Including significant air-ground capabilities.

    IIRC there is no plausible way round this.
  • That one's more than a fortnight old.
    I'm sure Labour will be under 5% by now.
    Just been posted by Election maps and must alarm the 25 Labour mps who are at risk
  • Meanwhile, have we done this one yet?

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 29% (=)
    CON: 23% (-2)
    RFM: 22% (+1)
    LDM: 11% (+1)
    GRN: 10% (+1)
    SNP: 3% (=)

    Via @opiniumresearch.bsky.social, 18-20 Dec.
    Changes w/ 27-29 Nov.

    https://bsky.app/profile/electionmaps.uk/post/3ldu3zuvkfk2c
  • RandallFlaggRandallFlagg Posts: 1,314

    That one's more than a fortnight old.
    I'm sure Labour will be under 5% by now.
    I suspect when it comes to it much of that Reform vote will hold their nose and vote for SLAB come 2026. At the least when it comes to the constituency vote.
  • Meanwhile, have we done this one yet?

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 29% (=)
    CON: 23% (-2)
    RFM: 22% (+1)
    LDM: 11% (+1)
    GRN: 10% (+1)
    SNP: 3% (=)

    Via @opiniumresearch.bsky.social, 18-20 Dec.
    Changes w/ 27-29 Nov.

    https://bsky.app/profile/electionmaps.uk/post/3ldu3zuvkfk2c

    Yes - posted yesterday
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987

    Meanwhile, have we done this one yet?

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 29% (=)
    CON: 23% (-2)
    RFM: 22% (+1)
    LDM: 11% (+1)
    GRN: 10% (+1)
    SNP: 3% (=)

    Via @opiniumresearch.bsky.social, 18-20 Dec.
    Changes w/ 27-29 Nov.

    https://bsky.app/profile/electionmaps.uk/post/3ldu3zuvkfk2c

    Labour down to Brown 2010 levels? Only divide on right between Tories and Reform would see Starmer scrape home with a small majority and Opinium has the best figures for Labour of any recent poll
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
    Mauritius is a lovely country, peaceful, prosperous, comfortably multicultural, democratic and full of free enterprise. Indeed you could make a case for it as the most successful African economy since independence. It was impoverished then.

    It's not our poodle any more which is perhaps the PB Blimps resent it so much.
    I am calling them despicable over their money-grubbing entitled tactics over a territory they've never owned. It wasn't a long-term assessment of the country - in general I don't give a hoot about the place and when this snafu is over I look forward to returning to that blissful state.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,656
    HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
    Mauritius is a lovely country, peaceful, prosperous, comfortably multicultural, democratic and full of free enterprise. Indeed you could make a case for it as the most successful African economy since independence. It was impoverished then.

    It's not our poodle any more which is perhaps the PB Blimps resent it so much.
    Doesn't allow Chagos Islanders independence though
    Are there any real Chagos Islanders any more?

    The reality is that people were pushed out over a half century ago (and sent to Mauritius or the Seychelles), and there is nowhere on the islands for them to live.

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,869
    Omnium said:

    Farage at 15% is astonishing there. Scotland, Farage, it makes no sense. Mind you they do allow the orange fool to flatten and make comedy out of some acres of their country too.
    Just rejoice at that news.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    So much principal in foreign affairs

    Mauritius is a despicable country, and any Government worth its salt would grasp this opportunity to say OK, f**k off then.
    A nice country to lie on a beach at and explore with a friendly population but its government leaves a bit to be desired.

    Though I once went to a wedding there with its then PM who was surrounded by security staff and spent most of the reception half asleep
    That's probably a decent summary of any country with a coastline.
    I wouldn't personally want a beach day in Greenland or the Falkland Islands, but each to his own,
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,927
    Omnium said:

    Farage at 15% is astonishing there. Scotland, Farage, it makes no sense. Mind you they do allow the orange fool to flatten and make comedy out of some acres of their country too.
    I think there’s a certain type of Scottish voter who would be prepared to vote for a more right wing party but who would never, ever be able to bring themselves to vote Tory, such is the incredibly deep seated distrust and aversion to the party among large swathes of Scottish society. Those are the sorts of voters I could see Reform attracting. There must be similar potential in places like Merseyside.
  • That one's more than a fortnight old.
    I'm sure Labour will be under 5% by now.
    I suspect when it comes to it much of that Reform vote will hold their nose and vote for SLAB come 2026. At the least when it comes to the constituency vote.
    I think what is is telling us is the SNP are finally getting their act together, and Farage continues to attrack the protest vote, though our Scots colleagues will have their own view no doubt on Labour's collapse in Scotland
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,937
    edited December 23
    ydoethur said:

    MattW said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    If the voting age is reduced to 16 there should also be a maximum voting age of 80.

    A Cardinal rule?
    Lordy lordy!
    Take it as red.
    Red Shoes ...

    (It's a sin.)
    That's a Shearer drop than I was expecting.
    I'm giving this up.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,987

    That one's more than a fortnight old.
    I'm sure Labour will be under 5% by now.
    I suspect when it comes to it much of that Reform vote will hold their nose and vote for SLAB come 2026. At the least when it comes to the constituency vote.
    I think what is is telling us is the SNP are finally getting their act together, and Farage continues to attrack the protest vote, though our Scots colleagues will have their own view no doubt on Labour's collapse in Scotland
    No they aren't SNP are still miles behind their 2015, 2019 and even 2017 voteshares, what is clear is that some of the nationalist Scottish vote that backed Salmond has now switched to Farage after his passing and some of the Scottish Tory vote has gone to Farage too. SLab are down to 2021 levels
Sign In or Register to comment.