Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Tonight’s Opinium poll for the Observer sees the LAB share

SystemSystem Posts: 11,703
edited March 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Tonight’s Opinium poll for the Observer sees the LAB share drop to lowest level since 2010

The fortnightly online poll by Opinium for the Observer is out and sees the LAB lead down to 5% and the party with its smallest share with the firm since 2010.

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,442
    Hmmmm.... must be an outlier :)
  • Options
    MrsBMrsB Posts: 574
    See Labour, this is what you get for attacking Waitrose.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Good evening, everyone.

    Nice to see you on, MrsB :)

    Can't quite believe Lib Dem 10 and UKIP 19.

    FPT: Mr. Cooke, the fallen angel line is interesting. It reminds me of the Lucifer/Prometheus comparison. Both were punished for giving the light of knowledge to man (the fruit of knowledge in Eden and fire in Greek mythology). But Lucifer's considered wicked, and Prometheus is seen as a force for enlightenment and progress.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    F1: Rosberg down to 5.5. Was 17 (both Ladbrokes).
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,002
    edited March 2014
    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!
  • Options
    Fat_SteveFat_Steve Posts: 361
    What will be the polling effect of Ed Milliband being in the news today?
    I predict a small drop in Labour's lead middle of next week.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Isam, sounds like Renly, with his 100,000 men and no throne.

    [I'm rewatching the second series of Game of Thrones].
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    19% for UKIP??

    I have not been keeping such a close eye on English politics, but that figure of 19% strikes me as quite stunning, if anywhere close to reality. Of course, under FPTP it will do them bugger all good, but this Euro election (under the D'Honte system) will be fascinating.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Dickson, I'd suggest that if they actually got 19% in the General Election UKIP would probably pick up a couple of seats.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014
    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    They will justify it very easily. They will say that they have campaigned for many years for a 'fairer' voting system and that it is not their fault that they have not been in a position to get this pushed through.

    Personally I think PR based on party 'fairness' is a rotten system even though it would mean seats for UKIP. But it is hardly reasonable to attack the Lib Dems for benefiting under a system they have consistently opposed
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792
    Certainly suggests that UKIP is eating into Old Labour and LD to Labour shifters are drifting back home. The prognosis looks grim for EdM.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    Mr. Dickson, I'd suggest that if they actually got 19% in the General Election UKIP would probably pick up a couple of seats.

    Agreed. Remember they are sub 3% in Scotland, and probably sub 5% in most of Wales, and their vote distribution in England is very uneven, therefore they must be doing extremely well in some patches of England.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    They will justify it very easily. They will say that they have campaigned for many years for a 'fairer' voting system and that it is not their fault that they have not been in a position to get this pushed through.

    Personally I think PR based on party 'fairness' is a rotten system even though it would mean seats for UKIP. But it is hardly reasonable to attack the Lib Dems for benefiting under a system they have consistently opposed
    In the next coalition agreement, will retainging the FPTP system be one of the LD's demands ?
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    No one seems to mention the Tories' 29% or have people got used to it ?
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    surbiton said:

    No one seems to mention the Tories' 29% or have people got used to it ?

    Tories are Crap. Tis an old headline. When was the last time they won a majority? 1992 wasn't it? That really is ancient history. A lot of current voters weren't even born then.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    The Ukrainian government has just said that if the Russian troops do not return to their bases immediately then it will lead to war. Repeat: lead to war.

    Is Hunchman about? I can see the equity markets taking "a bit of a dip" on Monday.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @iainmartin1: You can't claim credit for shift in Western policy to non-intervention then deny any connection to Putin concluding West doesn't intervene
  • Options
    NextNext Posts: 826

    The Ukrainian government has just said that if the Russian troops do not return to their bases immediately then it will lead to war. Repeat: lead to war.

    *Putin shrugs*
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    "Military intervention would be the beginning of war and the end of any relations between Ukraine and Russia," says Ukraine PM

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10669670/Ukraine-live-Crimea-leader-appeals-to-Putin-to-help-as-Obama-warns-of-costs-to-Moscow.html
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,002

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    They will justify it very easily. They will say that they have campaigned for many years for a 'fairer' voting system and that it is not their fault that they have not been in a position to get this pushed through.

    Personally I think PR based on party 'fairness' is a rotten system even though it would mean seats for UKIP. But it is hardly reasonable to attack the Lib Dems for benefiting under a system they have consistently opposed
    I'm not attacking them, I just think it would be fun to see them squirm. It would surely embarrass them , but I do wonder if any would say publicly its unfair on Ukip

    Personally I have no big opinion on voting systems., 19% and no seats would just mean even greater public hatred of the political class and system and ukip growing fasteri in my opinion. I d rather that than 10% and two seats

  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    FPT
    SeanT said:

    That Opinium poll is worth noting - because it takes Labour (for the first time? certainly one of the very few times) below that critical 35 point threshold.

    Of course they'd still win by a distance on these figures; nonetheless it will be mildly unnerving for more observant lefties/

    Not just Labour's vote share crashing through the 35% floor but the relative direction of travel: Tories up, Labour down.

    More than mildly unnerving methinks.

    All Labour need now is for the Mail to remind us that Ed's grandfather, Sam, served in the Red Army.
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,819




    FPT: Mr. Cooke, the fallen angel line is interesting. It reminds me of the Lucifer/Prometheus comparison. Both were punished for giving the light of knowledge to man (the fruit of knowledge in Eden and fire in Greek mythology). But Lucifer's considered wicked, and Prometheus is seen as a force for enlightenment and progress.

    Oh, the background of Tolkien's world is fascinating. I slightly over-egged Sauron by calling him a fallen Archangel; he was more like one of the most powerful Angels below the Archangels.

    (The 15 greatest of the angel-analogues were the "Powers" of Earth (Archangel-analogues) ("The Valar"), and one of the most powerful (either the most powerful or equal most powerful) was the original Dark Lord, Morgoth, Sauron's master.

    Sauron was one of the greatest of the angel-analogues below the Valar ("The Maiar", or hands of the Powers).)

    Morgoth's motivation was utter nihilism: he hated that there were creations not subservient to his will so wished to destroy all. Sauron's motivation was subtler: he wished to order everything for the greater good, but to do that, he just had to take control. And he admired Morgoth for the latter's decisiveness and sheer power at getting things done (the other Valar were worried about damaging God's Creation). He then fell to darkness by following Morgoth and losing sight of his destination for the journey; valuing force and fear for its ability to get things done.

    (Tolkien also had Morgoth causing the Fall of Man off-scene, but referred to in an unpublished story)
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Cooke, I much prefer the Silmarillion to Lord of the Rings.

    Must admit that, whilst I've done more background work than I reveal in books, to keep things consistent, I haven't gone into anywhere near the same level of detail where the gods are concerned.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: If there's one thing more sickening than the Syria vote it's apologists for that vote desperately trying to duck the logical consequences.
  • Options
    Tonight's thread headline reads:

    "The LDs get best Opinium figures since 2011"

    And what exactly is that score I hear you ask .........

    10% ..... yes that's right 10% LOL ..... LOL ..... LOL ..... LOL ..
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,442

    Tonight's thread headline reads:

    "The LDs get best Opinium figures since 2011"

    And what exactly is that score I hear you ask .........

    10% ..... yes that's right 10% LOL ..... LOL ..... LOL ..... LOL ..

    Clegg = Mr. 10%?
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    Tonight's thread headline reads:

    "The LDs get best Opinium figures since 2011"

    And what exactly is that score I hear you ask .........

    10% ..... yes that's right 10% LOL ..... LOL ..... LOL ..... LOL ..

    I was thinking the same thing.

    They get the bunting out for 10%, and yet Mark Senior scoffs when the SNP poll 44%. Odd folk those Lib Dems.

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    F1: some qualifying changes have been made to stop teams avoiding running in Q3.

    Dare I say it, they appear to have introduced a rule change which may improve the sport?
    http://www1.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/9190724/f1s-strategy-group-has-approved-changes-to-the-qualifying-format
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    Mr. Dickson, I'd suggest that if they actually got 19% in the General Election UKIP would probably pick up a couple of seats.

    Yes, I'd agree. Probably more than a couple with 19%, in fact.

    The flip side of that is the unequal distribution - which implicitly is NOT built into the seats projection - would have an impact on how all the other seats went.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    I am not sure that Sam Milliband did serve in the Red army, though he was born in the Russian empire, and did hotfoot to Belgium after the Soviet Polish war.

    The seats outcome in 2015 based on this poll sounds about right to me give or take a dozen seats for each party.
    AveryLP said:

    FPT

    SeanT said:

    That Opinium poll is worth noting - because it takes Labour (for the first time? certainly one of the very few times) below that critical 35 point threshold.

    Of course they'd still win by a distance on these figures; nonetheless it will be mildly unnerving for more observant lefties/

    Not just Labour's vote share crashing through the 35% floor but the relative direction of travel: Tories up, Labour down.

    More than mildly unnerving methinks.

    All Labour need now is for the Mail to remind us that Ed's grandfather, Sam, served in the Red Army.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Duma says possible use of Russian army in Ukraine has humanitarian purpose

    Russia March 01, 22:39 UTC+4

    Irina Yarovaya reiterated the repeatedly pronounced position of Russian parliamentarians that power in Ukraine was seized by force.


    The propaganda war rages.

    Kippers should be encouraged that the Russian Duma is full of elected fruitcakes.

    The rant in its full glory: http://bit.ly/1mNeOzR
  • Options
    AlasdairAlasdair Posts: 72
    Next said:

    The Ukrainian government has just said that if the Russian troops do not return to their bases immediately then it will lead to war. Repeat: lead to war.

    *Putin shrugs*
    Where will Herr Putin's territorial ambitions end? The Elbe? Seems like a repeat of the Sudetenland crisis or Anschluss. I hope there are some millitary people in the Kremlin prepared to tell him not to start World War 3.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,002
    edited March 2014
    It would be amazing to think that almost 24% of voters would have zero representation in parliament... Not complaining just remarking

    In terms of English voters that must be near 40%
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited March 2014
    Dr. Sox

    Are you suggesting that Sam Miliband was one of those "KGB Colonels" instead?

    Source: Ralph Miliband: Biography by John Simkin

    Sam Miliband, a former member of the Red Army, had left Poland after the First World War and became a leather worker in Belgium. His mother, Renia Miliband, travelled around selling women's hats.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the "women's hats" bit was more damaging to Labour's cause.

    Perhaps we should be calling EM, Ed Milliner.

    I am not sure that Sam Milliband did serve in the Red army, though he was born in the Russian empire, and did hotfoot to Belgium after the Soviet Polish war.

    The seats outcome in 2015 based on this poll sounds about right to me give or take a dozen seats for each party.

    AveryLP said:

    FPT

    SeanT said:

    That Opinium poll is worth noting - because it takes Labour (for the first time? certainly one of the very few times) below that critical 35 point threshold.

    Of course they'd still win by a distance on these figures; nonetheless it will be mildly unnerving for more observant lefties/

    Not just Labour's vote share crashing through the 35% floor but the relative direction of travel: Tories up, Labour down.

    More than mildly unnerving methinks.

    All Labour need now is for the Mail to remind us that Ed's grandfather, Sam, served in the Red Army.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    That is sort of what NATO was there for in the first place - although only to protect its own members, rather than any bordering Moscow's lands.

    Whether war would be justified is questionable but there really ought to be some serious diplomatic consequences if an invasion / occupation / unilaterally recognised declaration of independence and alliance occurs. The next G8 is scheduled to take place in Sochi in June. The withdrawal of the other seven and a G7 meeting elsewhere - indeed, the reversion of the G8 to the G7 - might be a start.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,442
    AveryLP said:

    Duma says possible use of Russian army in Ukraine has humanitarian purpose

    Russia March 01, 22:39 UTC+4

    Irina Yarovaya reiterated the repeatedly pronounced position of Russian parliamentarians that power in Ukraine was seized by force.


    The propaganda war rages.

    Kippers should be encouraged that the Russian Duma is full of elected fruitcakes.

    The rant in its full glory: http://bit.ly/1mNeOzR

    UKIP and the Russians have a common foe - the EU!
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758




    FPT: Mr. Cooke, the fallen angel line is interesting. It reminds me of the Lucifer/Prometheus comparison. Both were punished for giving the light of knowledge to man (the fruit of knowledge in Eden and fire in Greek mythology). But Lucifer's considered wicked, and Prometheus is seen as a force for enlightenment and progress.

    Oh, the background of Tolkien's world is fascinating. I slightly over-egged Sauron by calling him a fallen Archangel; he was more like one of the most powerful Angels below the Archangels.

    (The 15 greatest of the angel-analogues were the "Powers" of Earth (Archangel-analogues) ("The Valar"), and one of the most powerful (either the most powerful or equal most powerful) was the original Dark Lord, Morgoth, Sauron's master.

    Sauron was one of the greatest of the angel-analogues below the Valar ("The Maiar", or hands of the Powers).)

    Morgoth's motivation was utter nihilism: he hated that there were creations not subservient to his will so wished to destroy all. Sauron's motivation was subtler: he wished to order everything for the greater good, but to do that, he just had to take control. And he admired Morgoth for the latter's decisiveness and sheer power at getting things done (the other Valar were worried about damaging God's Creation). He then fell to darkness by following Morgoth and losing sight of his destination for the journey; valuing force and fear for its ability to get things done.

    (Tolkien also had Morgoth causing the Fall of Man off-scene, but referred to in an unpublished story)
    Really? It's been a while, but I thought the issue was that while Manwe was willing to sing the song composed by Eru, Melkior (Morgoth) wanted to introduce his own themes and counterpoints.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    On topic, 63% for the main two and 73% for the main three Westminster parties is a real sign of decay. It has to be questionable how long the system's sustainable with those levels of vote shares.
  • Options
    FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: If there's one thing more sickening than the Syria vote it's apologists for that vote desperately trying to duck the logical consequences.

    Dan Hodges: Russia intervening in Ukraine is bad news for Ed Miliband.

    Unspoofable.

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,002
    Rufus wainwright on Jonathan Ross tonight... Bit of a mouthful for the host!
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Charles, must admit, I thought Eru was a bit unfair to give Melkor free will and then complain when Melkor used it.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,442
    Alasdair said:

    Next said:

    The Ukrainian government has just said that if the Russian troops do not return to their bases immediately then it will lead to war. Repeat: lead to war.

    *Putin shrugs*
    Where will Herr Putin's territorial ambitions end? The Elbe? Seems like a repeat of the Sudetenland crisis or Anschluss. I hope there are some millitary people in the Kremlin prepared to tell him not to start World War 3.

    Comrade!
    When an American diplomat remarked to Stalin how grateful he must be to see Russian troops in Berlin in 1945, he reportedly replied: "Tsar Alexander reached Paris*."

    * in 1814, when Napoleon first abdicated.
  • Options
    tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,548
    isam said:

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    They will justify it very easily. They will say that they have campaigned for many years for a 'fairer' voting system and that it is not their fault that they have not been in a position to get this pushed through.

    Personally I think PR based on party 'fairness' is a rotten system even though it would mean seats for UKIP. But it is hardly reasonable to attack the Lib Dems for benefiting under a system they have consistently opposed
    I'm not attacking them, I just think it would be fun to see them squirm. It would surely embarrass them , but I do wonder if any would say publicly its unfair on Ukip

    Personally I have no big opinion on voting systems., 19% and no seats would just mean even greater public hatred of the political class and system and ukip growing fasteri in my opinion. I d rather that than 10% and two seats

    iSam. I think you'd find most Lib Dems saying that was unfair on UKIP. Voting reform is so treasured by Lib Dems, they would never abandon this even if it wouldn't benefit them.

  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    They will justify it very easily. They will say that they have campaigned for many years for a 'fairer' voting system and that it is not their fault that they have not been in a position to get this pushed through.

    Personally I think PR based on party 'fairness' is a rotten system even though it would mean seats for UKIP. But it is hardly reasonable to attack the Lib Dems for benefiting under a system they have consistently opposed
    Ironically, the Lib Dems' preferred system (STV) would likely hit them quite hard were it introduced and were the Lib Dems to poll around 10%. It may be coincidence, but STV works best, assuming around 4-6 seats per constituency (which is probably the best compromise between proportionality and avoiding excessive candidate lists), for parties with at least 15% of the vote and who are transfer-friendly. Drop to 10% and there'd be a lot of seats where the Lib Dems would miss out altogether and probably more where they won only one on slightly more than the natural share than where they won two on less. It's the same kind of maths that could lead to something close to a wipe-out in the Euros, when a fully proportional system would give them mid- to high-single figures.

    I do wonder if the Lib Dems might suddenly discover the merits of AMS, which is kinder to parties in the 7-15% range.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    On topic, 63% for the main two and 73% for the main three Westminster parties is a real sign of decay. It has to be questionable how long the system's sustainable with those levels of vote shares.

    Glad you noticed.

    In Scotland it is just 47% for "the main two" (sic) and 54% for "the main three" (sic) Westminster parties.

    If the decay is far gone in England, it is terminal in Scotland.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014

    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    That is sort of what NATO was there for in the first place - although only to protect its own members, rather than any bordering Moscow's lands.

    Whether war would be justified is questionable but there really ought to be some serious diplomatic consequences if an invasion / occupation / unilaterally recognised declaration of independence and alliance occurs. The next G8 is scheduled to take place in Sochi in June. The withdrawal of the other seven and a G7 meeting elsewhere - indeed, the reversion of the G8 to the G7 - might be a start.
    Funny, as I remember it the last time a part of a country declared unilateral independence with Kosovo seceding from Serbia, we bombed the parent country to ensure the secession was a success.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,002
    tpfkar said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    They will justify it very easily. They will say that they have campaigned for many years for a 'fairer' voting system and that it is not their fault that they have not been in a position to get this pushed through.

    Personally I think PR based on party 'fairness' is a rotten system even though it would mean seats for UKIP. But it is hardly reasonable to attack the Lib Dems for benefiting under a system they have consistently opposed
    I'm not attacking them, I just think it would be fun to see them squirm. It would surely embarrass them , but I do wonder if any would say publicly its unfair on Ukip

    Personally I have no big opinion on voting systems., 19% and no seats would just mean even greater public hatred of the political class and system and ukip growing fasteri in my opinion. I d rather that than 10% and two seats

    iSam. I think you'd find most Lib Dems saying that was unfair on UKIP. Voting reform is so treasured by Lib Dems, they would never abandon this even if it wouldn't benefit them.

    That would be good to see, after all politics is meant to be about what the people want, not what suits politicians
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,061
    edited March 2014
    A reality check: (*)
    USUSSR
    Active personnel1,369,532766,000
    Reserve personnel850,8802,035,000
    Budget$554.2 billion $90.7 billion
    Budget as % GDP4.9% 4.4%
    Political will0% 100%
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Armed_Forces
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Armed_Forces

    Add in the other European countries that might get drawn in, and Russia (on its own) looks rather overstretched in purely military terms. But history shows that such comparisons are often false, from Napoleon's adventures in Russia, to the Russians in Afghanistan. For this reason, the row in the table that means the most is the last one.

    (*) I'd do this in a yellow table if I could be bothered...
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Tyndall, didn't that involve independence rather than joining a different country, and follow genocide?
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    That is sort of what NATO was there for in the first place - although only to protect its own members, rather than any bordering Moscow's lands.

    Whether war would be justified is questionable but there really ought to be some serious diplomatic consequences if an invasion / occupation / unilaterally recognised declaration of independence and alliance occurs. The next G8 is scheduled to take place in Sochi in June. The withdrawal of the other seven and a G7 meeting elsewhere - indeed, the reversion of the G8 to the G7 - might be a start.
    Let's have some sanctions on Russia. Er...they supply gas to half of Europe !
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    F1: some qualifying changes have been made to stop teams avoiding running in Q3.

    Dare I say it, they appear to have introduced a rule change which may improve the sport?
    http://www1.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/9190724/f1s-strategy-group-has-approved-changes-to-the-qualifying-format

    To be fair, after all sorts of silly qualifying systems, the authorities have found one that works well. Tweaking the final session to prevent strategic non-runs would improve it further though.
  • Options
    NextNext Posts: 826

    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    That is sort of what NATO was there for in the first place - although only to protect its own members, rather than any bordering Moscow's lands.

    Whether war would be justified is questionable but there really ought to be some serious diplomatic consequences if an invasion / occupation / unilaterally recognised declaration of independence and alliance occurs. The next G8 is scheduled to take place in Sochi in June. The withdrawal of the other seven and a G7 meeting elsewhere - indeed, the reversion of the G8 to the G7 - might be a start.
    Funny, as I remember it the last time a part of a country declared unilateral independence with Kosovo seceding from Serbia, we bombed the parent country to ensure the secession was a success.
    My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes....
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    The Elbe would be a little provocative. The Dnieper would sound about the limit.

    Will anyone want their son to fight and die to preserve the lands East of the Dnieper for a government of dubious legality?
    Alasdair said:

    Next said:

    The Ukrainian government has just said that if the Russian troops do not return to their bases immediately then it will lead to war. Repeat: lead to war.

    *Putin shrugs*
    Where will Herr Putin's territorial ambitions end? The Elbe? Seems like a repeat of the Sudetenland crisis or Anschluss. I hope there are some millitary people in the Kremlin prepared to tell him not to start World War 3.
    I appreciate that it is often said that Milliband Snr was in the Red army, but it seems actual evidence is thin, though possibly at least one sibling did. As a Jewish Marxist he may have been person non Grata in Pilduskis Poland whatever his military role. Much of what is now Western Ukraine was Polish at the time.
    AveryLP said:

    Dr. Sox

    Are you suggesting that Sam Miliband was one of those "KGB Colonels" instead?

    Source: Ralph Miliband: Biography by John Simkin

    Sam Miliband, a former member of the Red Army, had left Poland after the First World War and became a leather worker in Belgium. His mother, Renia Miliband, travelled around selling women's hats.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the "women's hats" bit was more damaging to Labour's cause.

    Perhaps we should be calling EM, Ed Milliner.

    I am not sure that Sam Milliband did serve in the Red army, though he was born in the Russian empire, and did hotfoot to Belgium after the Soviet Polish war.

    The seats outcome in 2015 based on this poll sounds about right to me give or take a dozen seats for each party.

    AveryLP said:

    FPT

    SeanT said:

    That Opinium poll is worth noting - because it takes Labour (for the first time? certainly one of the very few times) below that critical 35 point threshold.

    Of course they'd still win by a distance on these figures; nonetheless it will be mildly unnerving for more observant lefties/

    Not just Labour's vote share crashing through the 35% floor but the relative direction of travel: Tories up, Labour down.

    More than mildly unnerving methinks.

    All Labour need now is for the Mail to remind us that Ed's grandfather, Sam, served in the Red Army.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Mr. Charles, must admit, I thought Eru was a bit unfair to give Melkor free will and then complain when Melkor used it.

    I don't thing he ever complained did he? It was Manwe who got all pissy about things. I think Olorin (Gandalf) once speculated that Melkior's new theme was all part of Eru's composition
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    Yup ! "Fresh bodly fluids" from Dr.Strangelove.

  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    To put that into context, were those vote shares realised under a fully proportional list PR system (and obviously, changing the system would change how people voted so I'm not suggesting we can read straight across), the number of MPs would be something like:

    Lab: 215
    Con: 183
    UKIP: 120
    LD: 63
    Others: 69
  • Options
    That Conservative plan to stay in power in full:
    1. Provoke Russia into stepping up its military alertness
    2. Pledge unlimited support for whoever happens to be the President of Ukraine at the moment
    3. Ramp up the rhetoric as Russian and Ukrainian forces clash, demand NATO comes in to defend the freedom and democracy lovers in the Ukraine
    4. Get Britain nuked
    5. Retain power of whatever is left

    See, crossover is coming! Our Trident D3s crossing over the pole one way, and Russia's SS-18s crossing the other way....
  • Options
    Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    FPT:


    The more interesting thing from Opinium is the kippers bump up from 17 to 19 simply because Opinium have had them rock steady on 17 for their last four polls and from the end of December.

    Way too soon and too small for it to be anything other than interesting and worth keeping an eye on of course, but it would be somewhat surprising if Cameron's Cast Iron Immigration Pledge exploding in his face had no effect at all.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    That is sort of what NATO was there for in the first place - although only to protect its own members, rather than any bordering Moscow's lands.

    Whether war would be justified is questionable but there really ought to be some serious diplomatic consequences if an invasion / occupation / unilaterally recognised declaration of independence and alliance occurs. The next G8 is scheduled to take place in Sochi in June. The withdrawal of the other seven and a G7 meeting elsewhere - indeed, the reversion of the G8 to the G7 - might be a start.
    Funny, as I remember it the last time a part of a country declared unilateral independence with Kosovo seceding from Serbia, we bombed the parent country to ensure the secession was a success.
    Only because the Serb government - which had something of a track record in this area - seemed intent on carrying out another massacre of thousands of innocent civilians. Anyway, Crimea hasn't declared independence and certainly hasn't been through any democratic process to give such a declaration any legitimacy.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 31,014

    Mr. Tyndall, didn't that involve independence rather than joining a different country, and follow genocide?

    I am afraid that is a classic case of teh winners writing the history. We highlight the despicable behaviour of the Serbs (and yes it was) and conveniently ignore the despicable behaviour of just about everyone else who was happily indulging in ethnic cleansing.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,442
    Next said:

    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    That is sort of what NATO was there for in the first place - although only to protect its own members, rather than any bordering Moscow's lands.

    Whether war would be justified is questionable but there really ought to be some serious diplomatic consequences if an invasion / occupation / unilaterally recognised declaration of independence and alliance occurs. The next G8 is scheduled to take place in Sochi in June. The withdrawal of the other seven and a G7 meeting elsewhere - indeed, the reversion of the G8 to the G7 - might be a start.
    Funny, as I remember it the last time a part of a country declared unilateral independence with Kosovo seceding from Serbia, we bombed the parent country to ensure the secession was a success.
    My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes....
    "Let's bomb Russia!" - Kenny Everett

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsokGIeQFFI
  • Options
    Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    Freggles said:

    Scott_P said:

    @DPJHodges: If there's one thing more sickening than the Syria vote it's apologists for that vote desperately trying to duck the logical consequences.

    Dan Hodges: Russia intervening in Ukraine is bad news for Ed Miliband.

    Unspoofable.

    Textbook!

    LOL
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    On topic, 63% for the main two and 73% for the main three Westminster parties is a real sign of decay. It has to be questionable how long the system's sustainable with those levels of vote shares.

    Glad you noticed.

    In Scotland it is just 47% for "the main two" (sic) and 54% for "the main three" (sic) Westminster parties.

    If the decay is far gone in England, it is terminal in Scotland.
    Scotland has devolved powers in most areas to deal with that, which it does, comfortably. In as far as reserved concerns go, the situation's nothing like as low as in Northern Ireland, where the population seems happy to elect members that won't form part of the government.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,002

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    To put that into context, were those vote shares realised under a fully proportional list PR system (and obviously, changing the system would change how people voted so I'm not suggesting we can read straight across), the number of MPs would be something like:

    Lab: 215
    Con: 183
    UKIP: 120
    LD: 63
    Others: 69
    Personally I think pr/av etc is too complicated for voters... Having one box to tick makes it nice and easy

    My solution would be to have 630 constituencies and allocate the other 20 seats on national vote share. Something like one seat for each five percent. So if the results were as this poll suggested, ukip could choose 3 candidates to represent them in the House of Commons and their constituency would be 19% of the country spread about
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Herdson, sounds like another way of saying England needs devolution.

    If we get it, I hope they have a proper building instead of some poncey modern structure.
  • Options
    Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    surbiton said:

    Scott_P said:

    @mehdirhasan: Argh. Former NATO commander Admiral James Stavridis (retired) says NATO should prepare for war with Russia (!)
    http://t.co/QEUEqRihbs

    Yup ! "Fresh bodly fluids" from Dr.Strangelove.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKR32ImWYzw

    :D
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,819
    Charles said:




    FPT: Mr. Cooke, the fallen angel line is interesting. It reminds me of the Lucifer/Prometheus comparison. Both were punished for giving the light of knowledge to man (the fruit of knowledge in Eden and fire in Greek mythology). But Lucifer's considered wicked, and Prometheus is seen as a force for enlightenment and progress.

    Oh, the background of Tolkien's world is fascinating. I slightly over-egged Sauron by calling him a fallen Archangel; he was more like one of the most powerful Angels below the Archangels.

    (The 15 greatest of the angel-analogues were the "Powers" of Earth (Archangel-analogues) ("The Valar"), and one of the most powerful (either the most powerful or equal most powerful) was the original Dark Lord, Morgoth, Sauron's master.

    Sauron was one of the greatest of the angel-analogues below the Valar ("The Maiar", or hands of the Powers).)

    Morgoth's motivation was utter nihilism: he hated that there were creations not subservient to his will so wished to destroy all. Sauron's motivation was subtler: he wished to order everything for the greater good, but to do that, he just had to take control. And he admired Morgoth for the latter's decisiveness and sheer power at getting things done (the other Valar were worried about damaging God's Creation). He then fell to darkness by following Morgoth and losing sight of his destination for the journey; valuing force and fear for its ability to get things done.

    (Tolkien also had Morgoth causing the Fall of Man off-scene, but referred to in an unpublished story)
    Really? It's been a while, but I thought the issue was that while Manwe was willing to sing the song composed by Eru, Melkior (Morgoth) wanted to introduce his own themes and counterpoints.

    Mr. Charles, must admit, I thought Eru was a bit unfair to give Melkor free will and then complain when Melkor used it.

    Ah, the issue wasn't that Melkor introduced his own themes and counterpoints - the Ainur were positively encouraged to use their free will to do so (Manwe introduced themes about the winds and air, Ulmo about waters and deep oceans, and so on), it was that Melkor wished to drown out all other contributions as well as the original overarching theme and have all of it stem from his own mind.
  • Options
    Apocalypse-a-thon materiel for a Saturday night

    Dr Strangelove
    Threads
    By Dawn's Early Light
    The War Game
    The Day After
    Fail Safe
    On The Beach
    Planet of the Apes

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Mr. Cooke, been a while since I've read The Silmarillion, but my memory was that Melkor introduced his own themes but was chastised for it.
  • Options
    BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    isam said:

    isam said:

    I'd take 19% and no seats, and the LDs getting 28 seats with 10% just to see them try and justify it with a straight face!

    To put that into context, were those vote shares realised under a fully proportional list PR system (and obviously, changing the system would change how people voted so I'm not suggesting we can read straight across), the number of MPs would be something like:

    Lab: 215
    Con: 183
    UKIP: 120
    LD: 63
    Others: 69
    Personally I think pr/av etc is too complicated for voters... Having one box to tick makes it nice and easy

    My solution would be to have 630 constituencies and allocate the other 20 seats on national vote share. Something like one seat for each five percent. So if the results were as this poll suggested, ukip could choose 3 candidates to represent them in the House of Commons and their constituency would be 19% of the country spread about
    You then end up with 20 second-class MPs who are not elected by their constituents but from the scraps from the master's table.
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,819
    Anyway, on topic (belatedly): while I do have concerns about Opinium's methodology and difference from the rest of the pollsters, the Labour failure to pull away should concern Milliband and his posse.

    For me, it's the "Don't Knows" who did vote last time that are the muddying factor. If these - who never fully defected from who they supported last time - start trickling back as the reality of the oncoming election looms, we will see some shift in the polls. And not to Labour's advantage.
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792

    Mr. Herdson, sounds like another way of saying England needs devolution.

    If we get it, I hope they have a proper building instead of some poncey modern structure.

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/cheaper-to-tear-down-scottish-parliament-by-2020-1-3265721
    It's horrible,badly built and ruinously expensive to maintain.There's a growing movement calling for its demolition.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,005
    Miss DiCanio, so it's ugly, and expensive? Sounds like a bad divorce. Better to get shot of it.

    Only been to Scotland once, but I'm sure Edinburgh must have splendid architecture that can be used as inspiration for a better building.
  • Options
    BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789

    Anyway, on topic (belatedly): while I do have concerns about Opinium's methodology and difference from the rest of the pollsters, the Labour failure to pull away should concern Milliband and his posse.

    For me, it's the "Don't Knows" who did vote last time that are the muddying factor. If these - who never fully defected from who they supported last time - start trickling back as the reality of the oncoming election looms, we will see some shift in the polls. And not to Labour's advantage.

    Do we not have this in every single election, ever, in the course of history? And isn't the usual guidance that it's a mirage as the DKs either don't vote or break pretty much as the pledges?
  • Options
    BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789

    Anyway, on topic (belatedly): while I do have concerns about Opinium's methodology and difference from the rest of the pollsters, the Labour failure to pull away should concern Milliband and his posse.

    For me, it's the "Don't Knows" who did vote last time that are the muddying factor. If these - who never fully defected from who they supported last time - start trickling back as the reality of the oncoming election looms, we will see some shift in the polls. And not to Labour's advantage.

    ...I agree however that Labour's failure to pull away is a concern. But people were talking about "mid-term" crossover appearing during the autumn so at least that's not happened.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Miss DiCanio, so it's ugly, and expensive? Sounds like a bad divorce. Better to get shot of it.

    Only been to Scotland once, but I'm sure Edinburgh must have splendid architecture that can be used as inspiration for a better building.

    Edinburgh has better buildings, let alone inspiration for better buildings.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    BobaFett said:

    Anyway, on topic (belatedly): while I do have concerns about Opinium's methodology and difference from the rest of the pollsters, the Labour failure to pull away should concern Milliband and his posse.

    For me, it's the "Don't Knows" who did vote last time that are the muddying factor. If these - who never fully defected from who they supported last time - start trickling back as the reality of the oncoming election looms, we will see some shift in the polls. And not to Labour's advantage.

    Do we not have this in every single election, ever, in the course of history? And isn't the usual guidance that it's a mirage as the DKs either don't vote or break pretty much as the pledges?
    The Tories are looking for a straw !
  • Options

    On topic, 63% for the main two and 73% for the main three Westminster parties is a real sign of decay. It has to be questionable how long the system's sustainable with those levels of vote shares.

    I'm pretty sure there were posters on this site in late 2010 claiming "we are now returning to two-party politics".
  • Options

    On topic, 63% for the main two and 73% for the main three Westminster parties is a real sign of decay. It has to be questionable how long the system's sustainable with those levels of vote shares.

    Labour and Conservative were only supported by something like 37% of the eligible voting population and 42% of those registered to vote in 2010. All three establishment parties were supported by just over 50% of those eligible to vote and 58% of those registered. Those figures are damning enough of an indictment of the 'post war consensus' but if you use the Opinium figures it would be worse.

    Using the same turnout 36% of the eligible electorate would have collectively supported Labour or Tory and just 40% of those registered to vote. Similarly only 41% of those eligible to vote support the the three establishment parties collectively and 47% of those registered to vote. Some might say the post war consensus no longer has a mandate.

    Anyway the vote totals based on 2010's turnout for such vote shares are not happy reading for the establishment parties.

    Con 8.6 million
    Lab 10.1 million
    LD 3 million
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,442

    Apocalypse-a-thon materiel for a Saturday night

    Dr Strangelove
    Threads
    By Dawn's Early Light
    The War Game
    The Day After
    Fail Safe
    On The Beach
    Planet of the Apes

    Terminator
    Oblivion
    Book of Eli
    Independence Day
  • Options
    compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    edited March 2014
    Favourite Dan Hodges Headlines quoted on PB:

    Sun comes out is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Two plus Two equaling four is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Marginal voter losing the tv remote is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Floating voter finding lost sock in the fridge is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Labour majority will be bad news for Ed Miliband
    Curtains clashing with your wallpaper is bad news for Ed Miliband

    In other news strange how the last Populus poll was given the full squirrel treatment on here and produce a full two posts, whilst todays Opinium gave us a bit of excitement among the usual suspects, despite both having the same Labour lead percentage.

    Show me the crossover......Show me the crossover!
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,819

    Mr. Cooke, been a while since I've read The Silmarillion, but my memory was that Melkor introduced his own themes but was chastised for it.

    Key bits were: Iluvatar: "... ye shall show forth your powers in adorning this theme, each with his own thoughts and devices, if he will"

    Then we have interweaved and interchanging melodies in harmony with each other as the Ainur do just that to create a greater Music, and all is going well.

    Then Melkor decides to interweave matters that aren't actually compatible with the foundation that Eru laid down (as if he's trying to use a different key, cadence and entire fundamental theme to everyone else, not just add to and feed off of it - like jamming with someone who's actively trying to screw up the music), not in accord with the theme itself, rather than simply adorn it with his own imagination in harmony with the others, and in the discord, some start to attune their music with his entirely new theme (which is incompatible with the original overarching theme), causing the original melodies to founder.

    After the new themes were introduced by Iluvatar to combat this, you have two themes battling each other; Melkors "essayed to drown out the other music by the violence of its voice" (but failing as the strongest blasts are woven into Iluvatar's melody).

    So it's not because he amended the music, but specifically tried to alter it "in [Eru's] despite" and make it all in accordance with his own will alone.

  • Options
    CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 39,910
    edited March 2014

    Mr. Herdson, sounds like another way of saying England needs devolution.

    If we get it, I hope they have a proper building instead of some poncey modern structure.

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/cheaper-to-tear-down-scottish-parliament-by-2020-1-3265721
    It's horrible,badly built and ruinously expensive to maintain.There's a growing movement calling for its demolition.

    The SNP wanted the old Royal High School on Calton Hill. It was Mr Dewar and Labour (then as ever run from London) who refused to accept such common sense and who made the disastrous key decisions well before the Scottish Parliament was even convened. It was only the expenses scandals at Westminster, and the fact that Holyrood had got its act sorted out well before, that remedied that in terms of public perception.

    To be fair to the architect, he was dying of a brain tumour, I believe.

    What are your views on Portcullis House, in terms of architecture, sustainability and budget for function (as an office block for only a minority of Westminster MPs)?
  • Options
    TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    Lucky tim isn't still around ;-)

    Mail on Sunday front page – “Rage of Boris at ‘Osborne the liar’” #tomorrowspaperstoday #bbcpapers pic.twitter.com/EgGLn6Y5nv
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,819
    BobaFett said:

    Anyway, on topic (belatedly): while I do have concerns about Opinium's methodology and difference from the rest of the pollsters, the Labour failure to pull away should concern Milliband and his posse.

    For me, it's the "Don't Knows" who did vote last time that are the muddying factor. If these - who never fully defected from who they supported last time - start trickling back as the reality of the oncoming election looms, we will see some shift in the polls. And not to Labour's advantage.

    Do we not have this in every single election, ever, in the course of history? And isn't the usual guidance that it's a mirage as the DKs either don't vote or break pretty much as the pledges?
    Nope. The "Did Not Vote"s are the ones that don't vote; the "Don't Knows" have been a headache since 1992. They were the cause of the "failure of the polls" and that's when ICM introduced their "spiral of silence" adjustment, assigning a proportion of the Don't Know's to their previous party.
  • Options
    Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664

    Favourite Dan Hodges Headlines quoted on PB:

    Sun comes out is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Two plus Two equaling four is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Marginal voter losing the tv remote is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Floating voter finding lost sock in the fridge is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Labour majority will be bad news for Ed Miliband
    Curtains clashing with your wallpaper is bad news for Ed Miliband

    In other news strange how the last Populus poll was given the full squirrel treatment on here and produce a full two posts, whilst todays Opinium gave us a bit of excitement among the usual suspects, despite both having the same Labour lead percentage.

    Show me the crossover......Show me the crossover!

    Which do you think will come first, crossover or you coming up with a new joke?

  • Options
    Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited March 2014

    Lucky tim isn't still around ;-)

    Mail on Sunday front page – “Rage of Boris at ‘Osborne the liar’” #tomorrowspaperstoday #bbcpapers pic.twitter.com/EgGLn6Y5nv

    I seem to recall saying earlier the Boris had his own spin network and was perfectly capable of refuting all the latest rumours around his position should he choose to. Seems he has chosen to. The most concerning thing of course is the mere suggestion that omnishambles Osbrowne would lie and posture. That surely can't be true? ;-)
  • Options

    Favourite Dan Hodges Headlines quoted on PB:

    Sun comes out is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Two plus Two equaling four is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Marginal voter losing the tv remote is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Floating voter finding lost sock in the fridge is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Labour majority will be bad news for Ed Miliband
    Curtains clashing with your wallpaper is bad news for Ed Miliband

    In other news strange how the last Populus poll was given the full squirrel treatment on here and produce a full two posts, whilst todays Opinium gave us a bit of excitement among the usual suspects, despite both having the same Labour lead percentage.

    Show me the crossover......Show me the crossover!


    Erm,were you on a train with nigel farage recently by any chance?
  • Options
    compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    Ishmael_X said:

    Favourite Dan Hodges Headlines quoted on PB:

    Sun comes out is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Two plus Two equaling four is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Marginal voter losing the tv remote is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Floating voter finding lost sock in the fridge is bad news for Ed Miliband
    Labour majority will be bad news for Ed Miliband
    Curtains clashing with your wallpaper is bad news for Ed Miliband

    In other news strange how the last Populus poll was given the full squirrel treatment on here and produce a full two posts, whilst todays Opinium gave us a bit of excitement among the usual suspects, despite both having the same Labour lead percentage.

    Show me the crossover......Show me the crossover!

    Which do you think will come first, crossover or you coming up with a new joke?

    The crossover, though we will have to wait a very long time for both.
  • Options
    TomsToms Posts: 2,478
    With all these polls, is it possible to contract battle fatigue before the election even starts?
  • Options
    compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371

    Lucky tim isn't still around ;-)

    Mail on Sunday front page – “Rage of Boris at ‘Osborne the liar’” #tomorrowspaperstoday #bbcpapers pic.twitter.com/EgGLn6Y5nv

    No party does infighting better than the Tories, it's brilliant.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    On topic, 63% for the main two and 73% for the main three Westminster parties is a real sign of decay. It has to be questionable how long the system's sustainable with those levels of vote shares.

    Glad you noticed.

    In Scotland it is just 47% for "the main two" (sic) and 54% for "the main three" (sic) Westminster parties.

    If the decay is far gone in England, it is terminal in Scotland.
    Scotland has devolved powers in most areas to deal with that, which it does, comfortably. In as far as reserved concerns go, the situation's nothing like as low as in Northern Ireland, where the population seems happy to elect members that won't form part of the government.
    You misunderstand why Scotland has devolved powers. It is because we took them, not because you gave them to us.
  • Options
    compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    Toms said:

    With all these polls, is it possible to contract battle fatigue before the election even starts?

    Who needs polls, Gideon and Boris are doing the Battle of the Bullingdons.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Quite serious divergence between the bookies and Betfair on the Indyref market:

    Yes 9/2 (Betfair)
    No 1/4 (Hills)

    Arb anybody?
  • Options
    compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    edited March 2014
    Team Boris have accused Team Gideon of a dirty tricks campaign.....who'd a thowt it? I'm with Team Boris, Go Bojo!
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453


    No party does infighting better than the Tories

    Gordon Brown didn't plot Tony's downfall for 10 years. No, siree
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792
    Carnyx said:

    Mr. Herdson, sounds like another way of saying England needs devolution.

    If we get it, I hope they have a proper building instead of some poncey modern structure.

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/cheaper-to-tear-down-scottish-parliament-by-2020-1-3265721
    It's horrible,badly built and ruinously expensive to maintain.There's a growing movement calling for its demolition.

    The SNP wanted the old Royal High School on Calton Hill. It was Mr Dewar and Labour (then as ever run from London) who refused to accept such common sense and who made the disastrous key decisions well before the Scottish Parliament was even convened. It was only the expenses scandals at Westminster, and the fact that Holyrood had got its act sorted out well before, that remedied that in terms of public perception.

    To be fair to the architect, he was dying of a brain tumour, I believe.

    What are your views on Portcullis House, in terms of architecture, sustainability and budget for function (as an office block for only a minority of Westminster MPs)?
    I didn't know about the architect's illness and death. It seems the building is cursed.

  • Options
    compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    Scott_P said:


    No party does infighting better than the Tories

    Gordon Brown didn't plot Tony's downfall for 10 years. No, siree
    Crap plot, if it took ten years. Which side are you on Team Boris or Team Gideon?
This discussion has been closed.