Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Is this a by-election first? – politicalbetting.com

2»

Comments

  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    Andy_JS said:

    Wellingborough

    Lab 13,844
    Con 7,408
    RefUK 3,919
    LD 1,422
    Ind Turner-Hawes 1,115
    Green 1,020
    Ind Watts 533
    BF 477
    Loony 217
    Ind Bailey 172
    Ind Postmortem 18

    Lab maj 6,436

    SKS fans please explain
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,645
    Congratulations to the two new MPs. I hope they do a good job for their constituents.

    Lots of stuff to consider in this, but here's one: where on Earth are the Lib Dems?
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,041

    Congratulations to the two new MPs. I hope they do a good job for their constituents.

    Lots of stuff to consider in this, but here's one: where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    In Hull, Hertfordshire, and Hampshire winning local by-elections - the Hull result was a gain from Labour, the others huge victories in the blue wall.
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464

    Congratulations to the two new MPs. I hope they do a good job for their constituents.

    Lots of stuff to consider in this, but here's one: where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    I wonder if they pull out all stops in Rochdale?, stranger things have happened, Big Cyril came in on a byelection I believe (not that he is an example to follow)
  • Congratulations to the two new MPs. I hope they do a good job for their constituents.

    Lots of stuff to consider in this, but here's one: where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    Another is that 7 of the 11 Wellingborough candidates were "also known as".
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    edited February 16
    OT nice spot in polling about conspiracy theories: Someone did a poll about a conspiracy theory involving Taylor Swift. 42% of the people who said they believed the conspiracy theory said the first time they'd heard it was in the poll.

    https://bsky.app/profile/aedwardslevy.bsky.social/post/3klfoupvc7v2p
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,192

    Andy_JS said:

    Wellingborough

    Lab 13,844
    Con 7,408
    RefUK 3,919
    LD 1,422
    Ind Turner-Hawes 1,115
    Green 1,020
    Ind Watts 533
    BF 477
    Loony 217
    Ind Bailey 172
    Ind Postmortem 18

    Lab maj 6,436

    SKS fans please explain
    If Corbyn was leader, Labour would have got 25,000 votes.

    (c) BJO, 2017-2024
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,698
    edited February 16
    slade said:

    Congratulations to the two new MPs. I hope they do a good job for their constituents.

    Lots of stuff to consider in this, but here's one: where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    In Hull, Hertfordshire, and Hampshire winning local by-elections - the Hull result was a gain from Labour, the others huge victories in the blue wall.
    It does look as if the LD vote is more squeezable than the Green.

    Overall it does looke like the national polling is about right for real elections.

    Sunak is not just toast, he is charcoal ash.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420
    edited February 16

    stjohn said:

    The fact that Trump could end up being unable to pay his bills - and therefore unable to function, including functioning as the GOP nominee in a POTUS election - makes me think his current odds for the POTUS are way too short. Currently 2.3-2.32. But because personally I am so keen to see him lose, I don’t trust my own judgment. So I’m not laying him at this point. But please let it be true.

    I'd think there'd be a considerable political risk to calling in Trump's loans, and any fines can presumably be appealed. His election costs are probably funded by PACs. Otoh, IANAE or even American.
    He can appeal any fines, but he has to deposit the whole amount or a bond covering the whole amount with the court before he does so.

    A bond would cost him (in fees) an additional 10% of any fine/costs, and by the time he’s paid legal expenses and still lost the case (as there are no realistic grounds for appeal - ignore what he’s claimed has happened, because as usual he’s lying) it would just leave him in a worse mess.

    I suspect he will appeal because otherwise he faces an immediate fire sale of his assets but coupled with his ongoing criminal cases in New York and Washington (not counting Georgia and Florida) he may be in financial difficulty going forward. Hence why he’s mad at Haley for not dropping out.

    Seems likely he will try a crowdfunder to get his crazier supporters to pay for it.Indeed, it’s been suggested that’s actually his main reason for running again - to raise money.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,568
    If the swing in Kingswood was repeated everywhere at the next election, the Tories would win 177 seats. With the Wellingborough swing, it would be just 8 seats. (See the VoteUK forum for details).
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    TSE - Yeah I've done all the identity verification. This is on top of that. And also needing a solicitor to verify my address as my broker has gone awol.

    Sorry you are having such trouble. It sounds almost as bad as going down the polling station to vote, nowadays.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,130
    Andy_JS said:

    O/T

    Just been robbed by two people after getting off a night bus in Rome. Luckily I wasn't injured. They just got my coat with about 100 Euros and a debit card, (which I've cancelled). A bit shaken up. First time I've experienced anything like this.

    (The like for that was sympathy.)
    Hope you're OK, as it can really shake you up.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,130
    Tucker goes full loon.

    Tucker says after visiting a Russian grocery store he is “radicalized against our leaders” because Russians have it so much better than Americans.
    https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1758115980759253306
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,672
    Labour must be happy with that.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,750
    Surely time to ditch Sunak and bring back Liz Truss Boris Johnson Theresa May David Cameron ...
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    stodge said:

    Labour majorites:

    5,000 in Kingswood
    3,000 in Wellingborough.

    Ahead of the Uxbridge result, how many thousand were you saying Labour would win by? Not forgetting Labour stormed to an even more unlikely win in Yorkshire at same time.

    Psephology isn’t just spreadsheets working out what result will be in a constituency based on current national polling, psychology has to play a role. Not just voters going from one to another party in certain places, measure the happiness index in doing so. Because on General Election night it won’t ever be a flat swing everywhere, there will be geographical variations; but neither will average tactical vote among LLG be consistent everywhere, this will have large variations also.

    Geography - you can probably get on a bus in Kingwood and get off in Bristol Central, that will be a green bastion constituency after the General Election. The voters have gone green for reasons high on the happiness index.
    Narrative - Kingswood will be won by Labour on General Election night, probably Uxbridge too. The narrative on GE night will be get Sunak out, but that narrative is not so strong all day today, for simple reason these by elections don’t get Sunak out. So for LLG it’s a do what you want night. Can Labour win Kingwood without a single LLG vote? Otherwise in local elections the votes that help Labour here have been yellow, based on geography and Narrative, they could be yellow, green or red tonight not necessarily labour.

    You will love it if I’m wrong I suspect 😇

    PS if Labour fail to take Kingwood, the reason 99.9% will put it down to is the wobbly week Labour have had and “the mistakes” they have made - but 99.9% will be 100% wrong. I explained weeks ago why Labour could fail in Kingwood, weeks before they had any so called wobbles.
    Have you and Leon ever been seen in the same room? ;)
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,199
    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,672
    kinabalu said:

    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
    It’s a symptom of how out of touch they are. Fishing in a limited gene pool.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,094
    edited February 16
    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    Good morning

    Just catching the news and good results for labour indicating the current polls are fairly accurate

    Seems to confirm the GE will be in Oct/ Nov as just how much worse could it be even then

    Next interesting by election will be the result in Rochdale in 2 weeks and what, if any, implications it will have for labour
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,094
    edited February 16
    kinabalu said:

    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
    Utter arrogance and why they are out of touch

    Same with London mayoral candidate
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,583
    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    Donald Trump again threatens to sacrifice Nato allies to Russia
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/15/trump-russia-attack-nato-campaign-biden

    There's only one story around the world tomorrow: Judge Engoron dismantling Trump's New York business empire. Ending his ability to operate as a property magnate in New York - for life. Fining him half a billion dollars (including interest). For running a crooked property empire underpinned for many, many years by fraud.

    You'll hear Trumps wailing all the way from Manhattan.

    Let's see how that shakes up US politics.

    There is the small possibility that this leads to loans getting called, and that Trump ends up in serious financial trouble, and unable to pay his bills.
    The number I have heard is that he has around $300m cash on hand. So he's likely having to sell assets anyway. Or looking for a mug billionaire to bail him out. I guess there are such people in the US.

    Part of Trump's schtick has been his "I am such a great businessman" message. Let's see how that gets knocked when his wealth is taken away because of the fraud his empire undertook.
    .
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420
    edited February 16

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    Donald Trump again threatens to sacrifice Nato allies to Russia
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/15/trump-russia-attack-nato-campaign-biden

    There's only one story around the world tomorrow: Judge Engoron dismantling Trump's New York business empire. Ending his ability to operate as a property magnate in New York - for life. Fining him half a billion dollars (including interest). For running a crooked property empire underpinned for many, many years by fraud.

    You'll hear Trumps wailing all the way from Manhattan.

    Let's see how that shakes up US politics.

    There is the small possibility that this leads to loans getting called, and that Trump ends up in serious financial trouble, and unable to pay his bills.
    The number I have heard is that he has around $300m cash on hand. So he's likely having to sell assets anyway. Or looking for a mug billionaire to bail him out. I guess there are such people in the US.

    Part of Trump's schtick has been his "I am such a great businessman" message. Let's see how that gets knocked when his wealth is taken away because of the fraud his empire undertook.
    .
    Also we have the Stormy Daniels case starting in March. That should be finished by the start of July. If he is found guilty - not by any means a certainty - the charge carries a maximum sentence of four years. Which would, if imposed, effectively end his political career.

    What the Republicans would do then is another question.

    Edit - there would be something bizarrely ironic and very American about a man who rigged elections, swindled his customers and banks, tried to overthrow the government, stacked the courts and evaded his taxes being imprisoned for paying a porn star to not reveal he has a small penis that looks like a button mushroom.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,645
    Nigelb said:

    Tucker goes full loon.

    Tucker says after visiting a Russian grocery store he is “radicalized against our leaders” because Russians have it so much better than Americans.
    https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1758115980759253306

    During the Cold War, Russophile westerners were invited to Moscow and given the five-star treatment. Naturally, this showed off Russia at its very best. But they were not necessarily free to go outside their carefully-curated itinerary. They came back shouting the praises of the brilliant Communist system - not having seen the reality.

    The same thing happens now with North Korea, with tourists seeing the same 'ordinary' people in the background at multiple sites.

    Whilst I doubt Moscow has massive shortages of staples, Carlson's fallen foul of exactly the same thing.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    kinabalu said:

    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
    Since they were going to lose anyway, it is at least a handy excuse!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Andy_JS said:

    If the swing in Kingswood was repeated everywhere at the next election, the Tories would win 177 seats. With the Wellingborough swing, it would be just 8 seats. (See the VoteUK forum for details).

    Which eight numpties would we still be stuck with?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420
    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    If the swing in Kingswood was repeated everywhere at the next election, the Tories would win 177 seats. With the Wellingborough swing, it would be just 8 seats. (See the VoteUK forum for details).

    Which eight numpties would we still be stuck with?
    Perhaps @SeanT will stand in Stone and Penkridge?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,130
    I wonder why Hunter Biden wanted to testify in public rather than behind closed doors ?

    (Paywall free via Twitter link.)
    https://twitter.com/pbump/status/1758262935103635577

    Remember the ‘Biden bribe’ allegation? DOJ now says it was made up.
    At the beginning of May, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent a letter to the Justice Department making a stunning accusation: Evidence existed of “an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.” The letter called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to make the “verifiable, valuable” evidence public.

    ...Nor did Comer and Grassley ever generate any evidence to substantiate the bribe allegation. Instead, Comer spent his time trying to get the interview memorandum including the allegation released to the public — over the FBI’s objections, rooted in part on the fact that the claim hadn’t been verified.
    It is hard to overstate how much energy Republicans and their allies in the right-wing media invested in the idea that this was credible. When he announced the launch of an impeachment probe of Biden in September, then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) invoked the Smirnov allegation.

    ..Fox News has mentioned Biden in the context of “bribe” or “bribery” more than 2,600 times over the past 12 months. A Media Matters review of host Sean Hannity’s efforts to bolster the Republican impeachment effort tallied at least 85 segments focused on the allegation and the FBI form that documented it — despite the complete dearth of evidence supporting the idea..


    What happened to the PBer who was pushing this story for years ?

  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239
    I see Rees-Mogg has already popped up saying that the Conservatives need to swing right to absorb the Reform vote. He won’t be the only one to counsel that. And that would be very good news for Labour.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420
    Nigelb said:

    I wonder why Hunter Biden wanted to testify in public rather than behind closed doors ?

    (Paywall free via Twitter link.)
    https://twitter.com/pbump/status/1758262935103635577

    Remember the ‘Biden bribe’ allegation? DOJ now says it was made up.
    At the beginning of May, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) sent a letter to the Justice Department making a stunning accusation: Evidence existed of “an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.” The letter called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to make the “verifiable, valuable” evidence public.

    ...Nor did Comer and Grassley ever generate any evidence to substantiate the bribe allegation. Instead, Comer spent his time trying to get the interview memorandum including the allegation released to the public — over the FBI’s objections, rooted in part on the fact that the claim hadn’t been verified.
    It is hard to overstate how much energy Republicans and their allies in the right-wing media invested in the idea that this was credible. When he announced the launch of an impeachment probe of Biden in September, then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) invoked the Smirnov allegation.

    ..Fox News has mentioned Biden in the context of “bribe” or “bribery” more than 2,600 times over the past 12 months. A Media Matters review of host Sean Hannity’s efforts to bolster the Republican impeachment effort tallied at least 85 segments focused on the allegation and the FBI form that documented it — despite the complete dearth of evidence supporting the idea..


    What happened to the PBer who was pushing this story for years ?

    I think we drove him off by constantly bringing facts in that wrecked his theories.

    He first became abusive, then blamed everyone else for his being abusive, then said we all didn't understand American politics or the law, then said it wasn't worth engaging with us and flounced.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Kettle on Rochdale:

    Tony Lloyd, Rochdale’s former MP, died on 17 January. Ali, Labour leader on Lancashire council, was selected only 10 days later, the byelection writ was moved, and now Ali has been disowned as Labour’s candidate. All of this has happened before Lloyd’s funeral, which only takes place on Friday. The haste was bad enough. The decision-making was plain stupid.

    There is no disputing that this has been a damaging episode for Labour. However, the damage and the lessons are real but not terminal. The underlying arguments of the past 12 months – that it is time for a change, and that the Conservative party should not be re-elected after Boris Johnson’s rule-breaking and the Liz Truss budget – have not been blown away by Gaza or by the retreat on green spending.

    Labour has become too complacent about its long lead. It has behaved as though nothing is more important than to nurse that lead through to polling day, and that anything else is a risk.

    The world still turns. Starmer is not absolved from the need to offer a message of hope, not least on the Middle East, where Labour is being outflanked by David Cameron. And Starmer has certainly not won permission to look the other way for 48 hours, especially on an issue as serious as antisemitism, when his byelection candidate says something intolerable. The chief casualty of this week is not Labour’s prospect of power. It is Labour’s apparent belief that the Starmer party can ride unharmed above the rules of politics. That belief may have gone now. If so, good riddance.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420

    I see Rees-Mogg has already popped up saying that the Conservatives need to swing right to absorb the Reform vote. He won’t be the only one to counsel that. And that would be very good news for Labour.

    That's a mad idea. If they swing right, Mogg himself is completely fuc...hang on a second, I'm wrong, it's a great idea.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,130

    Nigelb said:

    Tucker goes full loon.

    Tucker says after visiting a Russian grocery store he is “radicalized against our leaders” because Russians have it so much better than Americans.
    https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1758115980759253306

    During the Cold War, Russophile westerners were invited to Moscow and given the five-star treatment. Naturally, this showed off Russia at its very best. But they were not necessarily free to go outside their carefully-curated itinerary. They came back shouting the praises of the brilliant Communist system - not having seen the reality.

    The same thing happens now with North Korea, with tourists seeing the same 'ordinary' people in the background at multiple sites.

    Whilst I doubt Moscow has massive shortages of staples, Carlson's fallen foul of exactly the same thing.
    Moscow is genuinely a pretty good place to live - compared with the rest of Russia.

    Assuming you live on the ground floor.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    I see Rees-Mogg has already popped up saying that the Conservatives need to swing right to absorb the Reform vote. He won’t be the only one to counsel that. And that would be very good news for Labour.

    Better news for the LibDems, as Labour already has the voters it needs, and those still toying with voting Tory ‘er gwaetha pawb a phopeth’ but who might be repelled by yet more right-wing nuttery are just the ones the LibDems need to turn 25 seats into 55.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,130
    ydoethur said:

    I see Rees-Mogg has already popped up saying that the Conservatives need to swing right to absorb the Reform vote. He won’t be the only one to counsel that. And that would be very good news for Labour.

    That's a mad idea. If they swing right, Mogg himself is completely fuc...hang on a second, I'm wrong, it's a great idea.
    Was that in his capacity as an MP, or a GB news 'reporter' ?
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,399

    Andy_JS said:

    Very good result for Lab in Wellingborough. I wonder why the Tory vote in Kingswood was slightly stickier than expected.

    Possibly we need to turn the question around and ask why Wellingborough saw the greater swing. It might be due to the causes of the by-elections, with Chris Skidmore resigning from Kingswood on a matter of policy, whether you agree with him or not, whereas in Wellingborough there was a more repellent vibe, not helped by the choice of candidate.
    That's what I'm thinking. Definitely a factor was that the voters in Wellingborough decided that the choice of Conservative candidate was taking the piss, and so an example needed to be made. Similar to the Winchester re-run in 1997.

    Crushing defeats for the Tories, and notable that Reform scored over 10% in both contests. Makes their opinion poll scores look a lot more credible.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,399
    kinabalu said:

    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
    The Tories choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate; Labour select an anti-semitic conspiracy theorist.

    Does this say more about how shit a job being an MP is, rather than how rubbish the political parties are?
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,399

    ...where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    In general I would say that Lib Dem voters, particularly their core voters, are more likely to be high-information voters with a higher than average willingness to vote tactically. It would have been a surprise to see them save a deposit in either of the by-elections.

    I've often said that the same is true for Green voters, so it is a surprise to see the Greens increase their vote in Kingswood and save their deposit.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,672

    kinabalu said:

    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
    The Tories choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate; Labour select an anti-semitic conspiracy theorist.

    Does this say more about how shit a job being an MP is, rather than how rubbish the political parties are?
    It must be rubbish to be a by election candidate. Totally at the whim of events outside your control. The press rummaging through your bins and digital past looking for anything to destroy you. Why would anyone sensible expose themselves to that?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868

    ...where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    In general I would say that Lib Dem voters, particularly their core voters, are more likely to be high-information voters with a higher than average willingness to vote tactically. It would have been a surprise to see them save a deposit in either of the by-elections.

    I've often said that the same is true for Green voters, so it is a surprise to see the Greens increase their vote in Kingswood and save their deposit.
    The reason the Tory MP resigned will have helped them
  • sbjme19sbjme19 Posts: 194

    kinabalu said:

    Jonathan said:

    Labour must be happy with that.

    For sure. Real votes confirming the big poll lead. They look unassailable for the GE.

    Why on earth did the Cons choose Bone's girlfriend as their candidate?
    Utter arrogance and why they are out of touch

    Same with London mayoral candidate
    And further weirdness the new Deputy Chairman James Daly. Very inarticulate and garbled (was on QT) not a media performer at all. Two disastrous results and Mogg and Daly both completely out of touch with reality.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,411
    Ive been amused by the Conservative spinners trying to polish the turd.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 8,682
    Did anyone else catch the weird bit on Sky News when Rees-Mogg was in Kingswood and stated he was there on behalf of GB News, not the Conservatives?

    I wonder if there was a directive from CCHQ not to attend?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,198
    Kingswood result doesn't look too bad tbh. Wellingborough beyond carastrophic
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Eabhal said:

    Did anyone else catch the weird bit on Sky News when Rees-Mogg was in Kingswood and stated he was there on behalf of GB News, not the Conservatives?

    I wonder if there was a directive from CCHQ not to attend?

    Doesn’t Mogg have a standing instruction not to appear on behalf of the Conservatives, whenever there is an election on?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    Pulpstar said:

    Kingswood result doesn't look too bad tbh. Wellingborough beyond carastrophic

    A car crash, indeed.

    New word of the week?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420
    Pulpstar said:

    Kingswood result doesn't look too bad tbh. Wellingborough beyond carastrophic

    We'll have to come up with Wellingborough boots to describe it.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,420
    Speaking of catastrophes, I've just looked at the test scorecard.
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,806

    Congratulations to the two new MPs. I hope they do a good job for their constituents.

    Lots of stuff to consider in this, but here's one: where on Earth are the Lib Dems?

    I think you’ll see where the LibDems are come the GE.
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464
    IanB2 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    If the swing in Kingswood was repeated everywhere at the next election, the Tories would win 177 seats. With the Wellingborough swing, it would be just 8 seats. (See the VoteUK forum for details).

    Which eight numpties would we still be stuck with?
    Probably Rishi Sunak among them
  • NEW THREAD

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,481
    Pulpstar said:

    Kingswood result doesn't look too bad tbh. Wellingborough beyond carastrophic

    The candidate selection there probably made it terminal.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,481
    @AndyJS sorry to hear you were robbed last night. Very unpleasant experience.

    Hope you're OK and please don't let it get to you too much.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,209
    edited February 16
    ydoethur said:

    stjohn said:

    The fact that Trump could end up being unable to pay his bills - and therefore unable to function, including functioning as the GOP nominee in a POTUS election - makes me think his current odds for the POTUS are way too short. Currently 2.3-2.32. But because personally I am so keen to see him lose, I don’t trust my own judgment. So I’m not laying him at this point. But please let it be true.

    I'd think there'd be a considerable political risk to calling in Trump's loans, and any fines can presumably be appealed. His election costs are probably funded by PACs. Otoh, IANAE or even American.
    He can appeal any fines, but he has to deposit the whole amount or a bond covering the whole amount with the court before he does so.

    A bond would cost him (in fees) an additional 10% of any fine/costs, and by the time he’s paid legal expenses and still lost the case (as there are no realistic grounds for appeal - ignore what he’s claimed has happened, because as usual he’s lying) it would just leave him in a worse mess.

    I suspect he will appeal because otherwise he faces an immediate fire sale of his assets but coupled with his ongoing criminal cases in New York and Washington (not counting Georgia and Florida) he may be in financial difficulty going forward. Hence why he’s mad at Haley for not dropping out.

    Seems likely he will try a crowdfunder to get his crazier supporters to pay for it.Indeed, it’s been suggested that’s actually his main reason for running again - to raise money.
    Trump's PACs spent north of $50m on his legal fees in 2023 alone from Political Action Committees, and the financial position of many state Republican Parties is dire. He's draining his own swamp.

    Haley:
    Another reason Donald Trump won’t debate me… His PAC spent 50 MILLION in campaign dollars on his legal fees.

    He can’t beat Joe Biden if he’s spending all his time and money on court cases and chaos.

    https://twitter.com/NikkiHaley/status/1752459334431195618

    Detail as of Feb 1: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/01/trump-pac-money-spent-legal-fees
  • kamskikamski Posts: 5,190

    rcs1000 said:

    Nigelb said:

    Donald Trump again threatens to sacrifice Nato allies to Russia
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/15/trump-russia-attack-nato-campaign-biden

    There's only one story around the world tomorrow: Judge Engoron dismantling Trump's New York business empire. Ending his ability to operate as a property magnate in New York - for life. Fining him half a billion dollars (including interest). For running a crooked property empire underpinned for many, many years by fraud.

    You'll hear Trumps wailing all the way from Manhattan.

    Let's see how that shakes up US politics.

    There is the small possibility that this leads to loans getting called, and that Trump ends up in serious financial trouble, and unable to pay his bills.
    The number I have heard is that he has around $300m cash on hand. So he's likely having to sell assets anyway. Or looking for a mug billionaire to bail him out. I guess there are such people in the US.

    Part of Trump's schtick has been his "I am such a great businessman" message. Let's see how that gets knocked when his wealth is taken away because of the fraud his empire undertook.
    .
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68175846
    Article on how Trump could pay his fines. Says he has 3 options:
    Secure a bond
    Sell assets
    Fundraising - his Save America PAC has already paid 10s of millions of his legal fees.

    It also says Trump told the court he had 400 million cash on hand.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,209
    Nigelb said:

    Andy_JS said:

    O/T

    Just been robbed by two people after getting off a night bus in Rome. Luckily I wasn't injured. They just got my coat with about 100 Euros and a debit card, (which I've cancelled). A bit shaken up. First time I've experienced anything like this.

    (The like for that was sympathy.)
    Hope you're OK, as it can really shake you up.
    +1

    I was once mugged in the walkway down the side of the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead by I think a difficult-to-understand druggie with a huge stick back in 2000. I still have a vivid memory; it was soon after my diabetes diagnosis.

    It was "Give Me The Notes" followed by a small nudge with (possibly - it felt that heavy) a baseball bat on the leg. The small nudge alone gave quite extensive bruising.
  • CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 480
    WillG said:

    It turns out that the UK’s economic challenges could not be cured by simply “putting the grown-ups back in charge”. It has become clear that, to get the economy growing, we needed radical changes, as Liz Truss had tried and failed to introduce, not the “more of the same” that Sunak represented.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/15/was-liz-truss-right-all-along/

    - As very few shrewd people said at the time of the Sunak coronation.
    Want radical? Rejoin the single market.
    Because if there's one thing the British economy needs right now, it is more low skilled immigrants.
    1) Europeans are on average better educated than brits, 2) leaving Dublin 2 and fronted is what has put us in this situation. I am just not seeing your point here.
  • TazTaz Posts: 14,418
    Sir Chris Hoy has cancer.

    Hopefully he will make a full recovery.

    https://x.com/skynews/status/1758562342105657402?s=61
This discussion has been closed.