"If you can't see that! If you are that blind!" -- Rep. Scott Perry gets very mad at a reporter who asks him what actual evidence Republicans have against Biden (he never cites evidence!) https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1701686360833155417
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2023/09/11/are-10-percent-of-spotify-streams-really-fake/ ...According to the Financial Times, JP Morgan analysts found that if someone uploaded their own 30-second track to Spotify and programmed their phone to listen to it on repeat for 24 hours a day, they would receive $1,200 in monthly royalties. Executives estimate that as much as 10% of all music streams are “fake” — artificially inflated from streaming farms where devices run services like Spotify on loop specifically to boost the listening count of these tracks...
Important update on myocarditis from Covid mRNA vaccines for people age 12-39 who received bivalent boosters: only 2 cases among over 550,000 people dosed Presented at CDC meeting today https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1701798110148886632
A government with a working majority in the HoC can do pretty much anything it likes, because it can change any laws it doesn't like. There isn't anything new about any of that AFAIK.
It isn’t that simple. @HYUFD’s “etc” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If we’re going to be academic about it there is discussion in case law regarding whether judges could overall statute in very certain and specific special circumstances. For example, for fragrant human rights abuses. Abolition of fundamental common law rights, etc.
We’ve had this discussion before and I was told I was wrong but I did a whole paper on this at law school. Probably my best piece of work. Academic sure, as in reality power would sit with who had the power to enforce, but this whole discussion is academic.
A government with a working majority in the HoC can do pretty much anything it likes, because it can change any laws it doesn't like. There isn't anything new about any of that AFAIK.
It isn’t that simple. @HYUFD’s “etc” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If we’re going to be academic about it there is discussion in case law regarding whether judges could overall statute in very certain and specific special circumstances. For example, for fragrant human rights abuses. Abolition of fundamental common law rights, etc.
We’ve had this discussion before and I was told I was wrong but I did a whole paper on this at law school. Probably my best piece of work. Academic sure, as in reality power would sit with who had the power to enforce, but this whole discussion is academic.
It's a load of bollocks anyway, as you can't change laws without consequences for other stuff. A government that tried to do "pretty much anything it likes" would get snarled up in a legal tangle very rapidly. Unless it decided to abolish all laws - and the you just end up with something like Mugabe's Zimbabwe or Putin's Russia.
A government with a working majority in the HoC can do pretty much anything it likes, because it can change any laws it doesn't like. There isn't anything new about any of that AFAIK.
It isn’t that simple. @HYUFD’s “etc” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If we’re going to be academic about it there is discussion in case law regarding whether judges could overall statute in very certain and specific special circumstances. For example, for fragrant human rights abuses. Abolition of fundamental common law rights, etc.
We’ve had this discussion before and I was told I was wrong but I did a whole paper on this at law school. Probably my best piece of work. Academic sure, as in reality power would sit with who had the power to enforce, but this whole discussion is academic.
No judges can't override statute law, we have no written constitution and statute law is supreme over common law
A government with a working majority in the HoC can do pretty much anything it likes, because it can change any laws it doesn't like. There isn't anything new about any of that AFAIK.
It isn’t that simple. @HYUFD’s “etc” is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If we’re going to be academic about it there is discussion in case law regarding whether judges could overall statute in very certain and specific special circumstances. For example, for fragrant human rights abuses. Abolition of fundamental common law rights, etc.
We’ve had this discussion before and I was told I was wrong but I did a whole paper on this at law school. Probably my best piece of work. Academic sure, as in reality power would sit with who had the power to enforce, but this whole discussion is academic.
No judges can't override statute law, we have no written constitution and statute law is supreme over common law
Comments
"If you can't see that! If you are that blind!" -- Rep. Scott Perry gets very mad at a reporter who asks him what actual evidence Republicans have against Biden (he never cites evidence!)
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1701686360833155417
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/13/happiness-of-girls-and-young-women-at-lowest-level-since-2009-shows-uk-poll
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2023/09/11/are-10-percent-of-spotify-streams-really-fake/
...According to the Financial Times, JP Morgan analysts found that if someone uploaded their own 30-second track to Spotify and programmed their phone to listen to it on repeat for 24 hours a day, they would receive $1,200 in monthly royalties. Executives estimate that as much as 10% of all music streams are “fake” — artificially inflated from streaming farms where devices run services like Spotify on loop specifically to boost the listening count of these tracks...
only 2 cases among over 550,000 people dosed
Presented at CDC meeting today
https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1701798110148886632
We’ve had this discussion before and I was told I was wrong but I did a whole paper on this at law school. Probably my best piece of work. Academic sure, as in reality power would sit with who had the power to enforce, but this whole discussion is academic.
A government that tried to do "pretty much anything it likes" would get snarled up in a legal tangle very rapidly.
Unless it decided to abolish all laws - and the you just end up with something like Mugabe's Zimbabwe or Putin's Russia.
HYUFD is either a fool, or thinks we are.
Much of their forest was replaced postwar.
Full Reforestation After War: How South Korea Did It
https://www.theearthandi.org/amp/full-reforestation-after-war-how-south-korea-did-it
Of course they don't have sheep farming.