For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Despite the national polling it's obvious that in Somerton and Frome, and scores of similar seats where the LibDems are 2nd and Labour a long way behind, that the LDs will be the winner
This is a punishment beating election for the Tories and people will vote for the party which will remove the Tory.
Meanwhile Labour have decided to respond to the Tories false attacks about Labour's imaginary manipulation by the RMT with it's own stupid attack website.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
Judging by his actions so far, he’s not going to stand down. So, he’ll have to be charged, tried, convicted, sentenced and subjected to recall before any by-election takes place. Can’t see all that happening within the next two years.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
Judging by his actions so far, he’s not going to stand down. So, he’ll have to be charged, tried, convicted, sentenced and subjected to recall before any by-election takes place. Can’t see all that happening within the next two years.
Yes, similar to Jared O’Mara in his brass neckery too.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Despite the national polling it's obvious that in Somerton and Frome, and scores of similar seats where the LibDems are 2nd and Labour a long way behind, that the LDs will be the winner
This is a punishment beating election for the Tories and people will vote for the party which will remove the Tory.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
Two thoughts that might just about add up to a straw for the yellow team.
One is that the location of Lib Dem votes is at least as important as the national total. The other is that a moderate Lab to Lib swing during this sort of election is often part of the playbook, as voters work out the best way to beat the Conservatives in their area.
But Ed D has been awfully quiet for a while.
On topic, how easily can Warburton string this out until the election? That's presumably his current plan. Like his many colleagues in the "Sleazy and Dumped" Party.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
On topic, it all depends on how quickly he gets charged, and what his plea is. He is clearly not going to resign as things stand. If he gets charged tomorrow, and pleads not guilty, we’re unlikely to see an outcome this side of Christmas and then there is a recall petition to organise if (assuming he’s found guilty) he gets a sentence above the threshold.
I think the most likely route to a by-election is him getting charged, pleading guilty to get some credit, and resigning as a result.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Hyufd The Hopeful keeps telling us of the poll evidence that indicates NOM as the likely GE outcome, but even the crude workings of Electoral Calculus are suggesting little more than 100 Tory MPs surviving the next GE. Nor do you have to a Labour or LD partisan to see why even this might be a serious overestimate.
For a start, there is tactical voting. Then there's the distinct possibility of an LD uplift in the polls when they begin to receive more publicity, as they normally do during a GE. Davey is no superstar but he is no mug either, and nor is Starmer. They are not going to have to dazzle to look preferable to the incumbents.
There is still a chance of a Tory recovery. Sunak is nothing if not sensible. If the Party plods on and avoids serious mistakes (like sacking him, for instance), if the economy improves a bit, if Labour begins to fragment and the Unions get too uppity, there is a chance the Tories get out of their current mess and escape with a decent rump of opposition MPs.
There is however at least as much chance that the opposite happens, in which case we really could be talking about near extinction and the SNP as HM Official Opposition.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It always was. John Stonehouse, Robert Maxwell, Tom Driberg, the Labour expenses scandal?
Edit, I suppose the main difference today is the cases I have quoted span 50 years. We could have all those and more in a fortnight this Parliament.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It always was. John Stonehouse, Robert Maxwell, Tom Driberg, the Labour expenses scandal?
Fair, but you had some talent coming through at the same time to offset the badduns. Where’s the talent in the post 2010 intake?
This would be beyond marvellous. And notice the casual footnote ...
Predicted seat changes by MP Some notable MPs are in danger of losing their seats, including the Prime Minister and fifteen other cabinet ministers:
Rishi Sunak (Richmond), Prime Minister James Cleverly (Braintree), Foreign Secretary Suella Braverman (Fareham), Home Secretary Ben Wallace (Wyre and Preston North), Defence Secretary Oliver Dowden (Hertsmere), Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Steve Barclay (Cambridgeshire North East), Health Secretary Grant Shapps (Welwyn Hatfield), Energy Mel Stride (Devon Central), Work and Pensions Gillian Keegan (Chichester), Education Therese Coffey (Suffolk Coastal), DEFRA Mark Harper (Forest of Dean), Transport Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry), Northern Ireland Alister Jack (Dumfries and Galloway), Scotland David TC Davies (Monmouth), Wales Lucy Frazer (Cambridgeshire South East), DCMS Penny Mordaunt (Portsmouth North), Leader of Commons
Also Boris Johnson (former Prime Minister), Liz Truss (former Prime Minister), and Kwasi Kwarteng (former Chancellor).
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It's partly our own fault. A friend of mine, a good, honest, intelligent and hard-working woman, has stood for election a couple of times, but has now, sadly, withdrawn from politics. This was in large part due to the abuse, a lot of it misogynistic, that she received whenever she campaigned. In the end she felt it wasn't worth the stress and possible risk to her family.
If we create a political environment in which only the most thick-skinned and narcissistic people can thrive, it's no wonder that's what we get.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Meanwhile Labour have decided to respond to the Tories false attacks about Labour's imaginary manipulation by the RMT with it's own stupid attack website.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
Political wonks can be so stupid sometimes. We see it time and time again where effective criticisms are not utilised, or are diminished by also using ineffective ones, or even outright untrue claims.
In the current climate the tories are not going to get benefit of the doubt but it's still a waste if that is all there is to that story.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It's partly our own fault. A friend of mine, a good, honest, intelligent and hard-working woman, has stood for election a couple of times, but has now, sadly, withdrawn from politics. This was in large part due to the abuse, a lot of it misogynistic, that she received whenever she campaigned. In the end she felt it wasn't worth the stress and possible risk to her family.
If we create a political environment in which only the most thick-skinned and narcissistic people can thrive, it's no wonder that's what we get.
Exactly, what sort of person is willing to put up with the abuse, the bullying, the need to lie and justify absurdities? I wouldn't go near it with a barge pole.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
You’re actually complaining that their policy isn’t naked opportunism.
Most of those activities are de rigeur in Frome....
You're sounding increasingly desperate in your justifications of the Conservative Party
Mark's an honest Tory.
That he may be but my point is about sounding increasingly desperate in justifying them. Perhaps I'm wrong about that. xx
MM aside, there really is nothing left by which to justify this Conservative Government.
I sense that quite a few punters, blinded by recency bias, are approaching this all wrong. It's time to believe the polls. It's not about 'might a NOM be likely?' or about 'precedence' or about Sunak 'staging a recovery.'
They are going to be on the receiving end of the full wrath and vengeance of the electorate.
The real question is just how low the tories will sink. I've said 100-150 but it might be fewer.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
I don’t think there’s much they could say that would change LD fortunes now. People are not interested in a none of the above option, they are ready to give Labour a chance. That’s FPTP.
I think the best tactic for the party is to focus very locally, and use the council elections, parliamentary by-elections and the next GE as the way to get back some ground in local government (where there is already good LD representation) and Westminster.
I see the party’s press comments, questions in parliament and TV interviews all the time because I follow their various accounts on Twitter. They are pretty active, but the press isn’t interested because they’re not an important part of todays narrative. I don’t think that matters currently.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
You’re actually complaining that their policy isn’t naked opportunism.
No I’m not. I’m complaining that they’re not putting together a coherent platform for NOM, rather than shrieking for reflexive windfall taxes that have destroyed the investment case for uk generated hydrocarbons.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Interesting thread on the Minsk agreement. Reading it, it’s hardly a surprise its outcome was sub optimal, and that Putin thought he could get away with a second crack at Ukraine.
Exactly 8 years ago today Putin, Merkel, Hollande and Poroshenko met in Minsk's Palace of Independence to negotiate ceasefire and peace in Ukraine after Russia's invasion in 2014. I was BY diplomat then and worked with the UA delegation. Here is my thread about that night. https://twitter.com/PavelSlunkin/status/1624400616838529024
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
Corbyn and Corbynism have been so comprehensively trounced that it is not a fear anymore.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It always was. John Stonehouse, Robert Maxwell, Tom Driberg, the Labour expenses scandal?
Edit, I suppose the main difference today is the cases I have quoted span 50 years. We could have all those and more in a fortnight this Parliament.
Yes, there has always been bad eggs and those who abused power for their own benefit. But I honestly do not think we have seen anything like what we have seen in recent years in its ubiquity.
Personally, I found most of the MP expenses scandal bordering on tragic. To give up any claim to probity for such trivial sums? But some, at least, were sucked in by what they were "entitled" to for all the crap they put up with. Now we seem to be seeing far more basic fraud and dishonesty. Its depressing and only the most one eyed can claim that any party is immune.
Most of those activities are de rigeur in Frome....
You're sounding increasingly desperate in your justifications of the Conservative Party
Mark's an honest Tory.
That he may be but my point is about sounding increasingly desperate in justifying them. Perhaps I'm wrong about that. xx
MM aside, there really is nothing left by which to justify this Conservative Government.
I sense that quite a few punters, blinded by recency bias, are approaching this all wrong. It's time to believe the polls. It's not about 'might a NOM be likely?' or about 'precedence' or about Sunak 'staging a recovery.'
They are going to be on the receiving end of the full wrath and vengeance of the electorate.
The real question is just how low the tories will sink. I've said 100-150 but it might be fewer.
You may be right and I'm not altogether comfortable with it.
In my (now considerablle) experience, Governments operate best when there is a decent Opposition. I can't see the SNP providing that.
Personally I'd like to see the iniquitous FPTP system abolished and some form of voting system established that is more suited to a modern democracy. There is zilch chance of that if Labour has a 400 seat majority.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It always was. John Stonehouse, Robert Maxwell, Tom Driberg, the Labour expenses scandal?
Edit, I suppose the main difference today is the cases I have quoted span 50 years. We could have all those and more in a fortnight this Parliament.
Yes, there has always been bad eggs and those who abused power for their own benefit. But I honestly do not think we have seen anything like what we have seen in recent years in its ubiquity.
Personally, I found most of the MP expenses scandal bordering on tragic. To give up any claim to probity for such trivial sums? But some, at least, were sucked in by what they were "entitled" to for all the crap they put up with. Now we seem to be seeing far more basic fraud and dishonesty. Its depressing and only the most one eyed can claim that any party is immune.
There was a lot of deference though. The transport minister who comissioned the Beeching report afaicr had massive shares in road-building companies. These things were just never questioned.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
Corbyn and Corbynism have been so comprehensively trounced that it is not a fear anymore.
Even BJO seems to have given up recently.
The electorate at large don’t pay attention in between elections. Corbyn will still be in the back of some peoples minds but it’s actually to the Lib Dem’s advantage to try and focus that closer to polling day. They won’t though.
Guardian story on cross-party talks between Remainers and Brexiteers.
Stuart, Gove and others meeting Ollie Robbins - with the intention of agreeing a cross-party consensus on how to improve EU relations post-Brexit
Looks like:
- Big business agrees that Brexit has been lowest decile (compared with expectations) - Stuart and Gove are trying to salvage Brexit 'gains' when Labour comes in - Improving EU trade relations is a priority - better trading relationship wanted by business.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It's partly our own fault. A friend of mine, a good, honest, intelligent and hard-working woman, has stood for election a couple of times, but has now, sadly, withdrawn from politics. This was in large part due to the abuse, a lot of it misogynistic, that she received whenever she campaigned. In the end she felt it wasn't worth the stress and possible risk to her family.
If we create a political environment in which only the most thick-skinned and narcissistic people can thrive, it's no wonder that's what we get.
Even at parish level it can quickly turn very nasty, between councillors but also from the public, and at that level its mostly powerless local volunteers.
You do even there need to be reasonably thick skinned, and from time to time we try to acknowledge even most MPs are decent sorts trying to do some good, but it's such a toxic environment filled with loose morals and partisan shithousery which seems to be what we want to see, that it's a pretty unappealing prospect to join it.
On topic, it all depends on how quickly he gets charged, and what his plea is. He is clearly not going to resign as things stand. If he gets charged tomorrow, and pleads not guilty, we’re unlikely to see an outcome this side of Christmas and then there is a recall petition to organise if (assuming he’s found guilty) he gets a sentence above the threshold.
I think the most likely route to a by-election is him getting charged, pleading guilty to get some credit, and resigning as a result.
Doesn’t he get to appeal as well before the recall petition can be organised? I think that was the case in Peterborough?
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It always was. John Stonehouse, Robert Maxwell, Tom Driberg, the Labour expenses scandal?
Edit, I suppose the main difference today is the cases I have quoted span 50 years. We could have all those and more in a fortnight this Parliament.
Yes, there has always been bad eggs and those who abused power for their own benefit. But I honestly do not think we have seen anything like what we have seen in recent years in its ubiquity.
Personally, I found most of the MP expenses scandal bordering on tragic. To give up any claim to probity for such trivial sums? But some, at least, were sucked in by what they were "entitled" to for all the crap they put up with. Now we seem to be seeing far more basic fraud and dishonesty. Its depressing and only the most one eyed can claim that any party is immune.
There was a lot of deference though. The transport minister who comissioned the Beeching report afai
This would be beyond marvellous. And notice the casual footnote ...
Predicted seat changes by MP Some notable MPs are in danger of losing their seats, including the Prime Minister and fifteen other cabinet ministers:
Rishi Sunak (Richmond), Prime Minister James Cleverly (Braintree), Foreign Secretary Suella Braverman (Fareham), Home Secretary Ben Wallace (Wyre and Preston North), Defence Secretary Oliver Dowden (Hertsmere), Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Steve Barclay (Cambridgeshire North East), Health Secretary Grant Shapps (Welwyn Hatfield), Energy Mel Stride (Devon Central), Work and Pensions Gillian Keegan (Chichester), Education Therese Coffey (Suffolk Coastal), DEFRA Mark Harper (Forest of Dean), Transport Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry), Northern Ireland Alister Jack (Dumfries and Galloway), Scotland David TC Davies (Monmouth), Wales Lucy Frazer (Cambridgeshire South East), DCMS Penny Mordaunt (Portsmouth North), Leader of Commons
Also Boris Johnson (former Prime Minister), Liz Truss (former Prime Minister), and Kwasi Kwarteng (former Chancellor).
Alister Jack (Dumfries and Galloway), Scotland David TC Davies (Monmouth), Wales
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Even as a Labour supporter I would find an outcome like that a bit scary. I would file it under Not Going to Happen, but if it did, blimey. Uncharted territory doesn't come close to covering it. Both main parties would be put under a lot of pressure by a result like that.
Btw, cases like this and the recent O'Mara conviction make you wonder about the quality of the vetting procedure for standing for Parliament.
I'd always thought it was difficult to get on the list but it seems that in some places all you need is a mate on the Panel.
{Horatio Bottomley has entered the chat}
There are no vetting procedures - I would be interested to find out if any party even uses a cursory background check. Let alone a full trawl through a CV, interview acquaintances from earlier days etc.
We are continuing to move away from having success outside politics first, to professional politicians. Aside from the issue of experience, there is no structure or definition to that career path.
Which means that someone can go from leaflet slinging to MP on the basis that out of x members of the local party, he/she is vaguely presentable and plausible.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
Too pessimistic, I think. We are in the run-up to a large round of local elections in May. Lib Dem leaflets will be dropping through letterboxes all over the country. I think the next few months will see an upsurge for the Lib Dems in the opinion polls.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
You’re actually complaining that their policy isn’t naked opportunism.
No I’m not. I’m complaining that they’re not putting together a coherent platform for NOM, rather than shrieking for reflexive windfall taxes that have destroyed the investment case for uk generated hydrocarbons.
I’m having a drink with one of their likely successful PPCs this week (who I used to do leafleting with around here) specifically to address the issue of taxing the big energy giants. I am keen to help introduce a bit more nuanced understanding of how international tax works - particularly the non-UK predominance of earnings, the effective rates already paid and the progress made on international tax reform already, because I firmly believe Lib Dem positions ought to be evidence based, not emotional.
Meanwhile Labour have decided to respond to the Tories false attacks about Labour's imaginary manipulation by the RMT with it's own stupid attack website.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
Political wonks can be so stupid sometimes. We see it time and time again where effective criticisms are not utilised, or are diminished by also using ineffective ones, or even outright untrue claims.
In the current climate the tories are not going to get benefit of the doubt but it's still a waste if that is all there is to that story.
Expensive hotels are easy to understand and make for good pictures. I assume they are going for the smear by association (I don’t know the story) and will probably succeed among people who don’t dig into the detail
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It's partly our own fault. A friend of mine, a good, honest, intelligent and hard-working woman, has stood for election a couple of times, but has now, sadly, withdrawn from politics. This was in large part due to the abuse, a lot of it misogynistic, that she received whenever she campaigned. In the end she felt it wasn't worth the stress and possible risk to her family.
If we create a political environment in which only the most thick-skinned and narcissistic people can thrive, it's no wonder that's what we get.
Exactly, what sort of person is willing to put up with the abuse, the bullying, the need to lie and justify absurdities? I wouldn't go near it with a barge pole.
A relative has heavy end post grad qualifications, coached an Olympic sport at high level and started his own business - from one-man-band to considerable success.
In times past he would have been dragged onto the Council, long ago. Probably Parliament as well.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Even as a Labour supporter I would find an outcome like that a bit scary. I would file it under Not Going to Happen, but if it did, blimey. Uncharted territory doesn't come close to covering it. Both main parties would be put under a lot of pressure by a result like that.
I'm sure they would be willing to take on that challenge.
Be funny if it led to a split though as everyone felt they were so far in front whipping broke down.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
You’re actually complaining that their policy isn’t naked opportunism.
No I’m not. I’m complaining that they’re not putting together a coherent platform for NOM, rather than shrieking for reflexive windfall taxes that have destroyed the investment case for uk generated hydrocarbons.
I’m having a drink with one of their likely successful PPCs this week (who I used to do leafleting with around here) specifically to address the issue of taxing the big energy giants. I am keen to help introduce a bit more nuanced understanding of how international tax works - particularly the non-UK predominance of earnings, the effective rates already paid and the progress made on international tax reform already, because I firmly believe Lib Dem positions ought to be evidence based, not emotional.
Good luck. I tried similar with a LD PPC and was told in no uncertain terms that no one is going to cry about taxed profits of the hydrocarbon sector. Notwithstanding that it’s making us more reliant on often dirtier imports from the US and Qatar and disproportionately harming the junior independents.
On topic, it all depends on how quickly he gets charged, and what his plea is. He is clearly not going to resign as things stand. If he gets charged tomorrow, and pleads not guilty, we’re unlikely to see an outcome this side of Christmas and then there is a recall petition to organise if (assuming he’s found guilty) he gets a sentence above the threshold.
I think the most likely route to a by-election is him getting charged, pleading guilty to get some credit, and resigning as a result.
Doesn’t he get to appeal as well before the recall petition can be organised? I think that was the case in Peterborough?
If he pleads not guilty and is convicted, then yes but, realistically, you can’t appeal conviction after guilty plea, which is my most likely route to a by-election. He could appeal any custodial sentence (even suspended) that would trigger a petition but for fraud of that magnitude…unlikely.
Where do all the parties get these people? Natalie McGarry, Jared O'Mara and now this. Plus, of course, the truly incredible George Santos in the States. Politics these days attracts narcissists, liars and fraudsters whilst largely repelling reasonably competent people who actually want to do some good. Its a danger to democracy.
It always was. John Stonehouse, Robert Maxwell, Tom Driberg, the Labour expenses scandal?
Edit, I suppose the main difference today is the cases I have quoted span 50 years. We could have all those and more in a fortnight this Parliament.
Yes, there has always been bad eggs and those who abused power for their own benefit. But I honestly do not think we have seen anything like what we have seen in recent years in its ubiquity.
Personally, I found most of the MP expenses scandal bordering on tragic. To give up any claim to probity for such trivial sums? But some, at least, were sucked in by what they were "entitled" to for all the crap they put up with. Now we seem to be seeing far more basic fraud and dishonesty. Its depressing and only the most one eyed can claim that any party is immune.
There was a lot of deference though. The transport minister who comissioned the Beeching report afai
Hyufd The Hopeful keeps telling us of the poll evidence that indicates NOM as the likely GE outcome, but even the crude workings of Electoral Calculus are suggesting little more than 100 Tory MPs surviving the next GE. Nor do you have to a Labour or LD partisan to see why even this might be a serious overestimate.
For a start, there is tactical voting. Then there's the distinct possibility of an LD uplift in the polls when they begin to receive more publicity, as they normally do during a GE. Davey is no superstar but he is no mug either, and nor is Starmer. They are not going to have to dazzle to look preferable to the incumbents.
There is still a chance of a Tory recovery. Sunak is nothing if not sensible. If the Party plods on and avoids serious mistakes (like sacking him, for instance), if the economy improves a bit, if Labour begins to fragment and the Unions get too uppity, there is a chance the Tories get out of their current mess and escape with a decent rump of opposition MPs.
There is however at least as much chance that the opposite happens, in which case we really could be talking about near extinction and the SNP as HM Official Opposition.
There's a new AI beta out, ChatHYUFD; have you tried it yet?:
"The energy and passion within our party is stronger than ever, and I truly believe that come election day, we will surprise everyone with a resounding victory. We have the policies and the people to bring real change to this country, and I won't give up on that just because of a few numbers on a page. I am, and always will be, a committed Conservative supporter, and I know that together, we will make history."
Meanwhile Labour have decided to respond to the Tories false attacks about Labour's imaginary manipulation by the RMT with it's own stupid attack website.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
Political wonks can be so stupid sometimes. We see it time and time again where effective criticisms are not utilised, or are diminished by also using ineffective ones, or even outright untrue claims.
In the current climate the tories are not going to get benefit of the doubt but it's still a waste if that is all there is to that story.
Expensive hotels are easy to understand and make for good pictures. I assume they are going for the smear by association (I don’t know the story) and will probably succeed among people who don’t dig into the detail
Undoubtedly, but they don't need to go that route.
There's a three course meal of scandals already laid on, no need to fill up on snacks.
Meanwhile Labour have decided to respond to the Tories false attacks about Labour's imaginary manipulation by the RMT with it's own stupid attack website.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
Political wonks can be so stupid sometimes. We see it time and time again where effective criticisms are not utilised, or are diminished by also using ineffective ones, or even outright untrue claims.
In the current climate the tories are not going to get benefit of the doubt but it's still a waste if that is all there is to that story.
Expensive hotels are easy to understand and make for good pictures. I assume they are going for the smear by association (I don’t know the story) and will probably succeed among people who don’t dig into the detail
Undoubtedly, but they don't need to go that route.
There's a three course meal of scandals already laid on, no need to fill up on snacks.
They believe in kicking their enemy while he’s on the ground
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Are there any markets up for number of Tory seats at next GE yet, or is it only on the spread betting sites? (I closed my spread betting account).
I believe Flynn has said the SNP isn’t interested in being the official opposition; I’m not sure whether this counts as an official statement but I’d approve of such a rejection of what would be a ridiculous charade. Would a parliament where Labour had 509 MPs be any more sustainable long term than one where they had a shaky minority government? Insofar as Labour would have a more than a don’t-frighten-the-voters manifesto at that point, I have a vision of a cartoon character swinging huge windmill punches at an opponent that isn’t there.
For the forged document to obtain a loan, a client of mine found himself sentenced to the Scrubs for 26 months.
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
Major had much more authority and pondus than Sunak. He was pro-Europe, pro-trade and pro-stability. He also had a Cabinet behind him that was not packed full of incompetents, thugs and crypto-fascists.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
Happy Battle of the Herrings Day everyone. One for English fish lovers everywhere.
The seals had to dig in deep to win that one
They fought with porpoise?
You could only tell if you had a birds eye view
You laugh but, trivia fans, it was the valour of the seal contingent at the Battle of the Herrings that led the US Navy to name it’s special forces unit in their honour.
The LDs. They’d win this, but then disappear again. The lack of a LD national recovery is befuddling. I guess they are just too far behind and Ed Davey is just a little too boring to attract attention.
They’ve got a policy problem. They should be positioning themselves as the necessary counter balance to a Labour Party not yet fully recovered from the Corbyn years. “We will protect you from the anti aspiration tendencies of the labour left”.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
Happy Battle of the Herrings Day everyone. One for English fish lovers everywhere.
The seals had to dig in deep to win that one
They fought with porpoise?
You could only tell if you had a birds eye view
You laugh but, trivia fans, it was the valour of the seal contingent at the Battle of the Herrings that led the US Navy to name it’s special forces unit in their honour.
You expect us to believe that? Sounds a bit fishy to me - cod history!
Meanwhile Labour have decided to respond to the Tories false attacks about Labour's imaginary manipulation by the RMT with it's own stupid attack website.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
Political wonks can be so stupid sometimes. We see it time and time again where effective criticisms are not utilised, or are diminished by also using ineffective ones, or even outright untrue claims.
In the current climate the tories are not going to get benefit of the doubt but it's still a waste if that is all there is to that story.
Expensive hotels are easy to understand and make for good pictures. I assume they are going for the smear by association (I don’t know the story) and will probably succeed among people who don’t dig into the detail
Undoubtedly, but they don't need to go that route.
There's a three course meal of scandals already laid on, no need to fill up on snacks.
They believe in kicking their enemy while he’s on the ground
They may end up hitting the ground and hurting their ankle - go too wide of the mark in accusations and the Tories can distract from the genuine issues by painting them as all being trivial and opportunistic like these ones.
Happy Battle of the Herrings Day everyone. One for English fish lovers everywhere.
The seals had to dig in deep to win that one
They fought with porpoise?
You could only tell if you had a birds eye view
You laugh but, trivia fans, it was the valour of the seal contingent at the Battle of the Herrings that led the US Navy to name it’s special forces unit in their honour.
You expect us to believe that? Sounds a bit fishy to me - cod history!
If only we could call on the knowledge of the fine animal/military historian Anthony Beaver.
With every day that passes we inch closer to the Leon Singularity
😶
“Other pilots saying that when they looked at the object they could identify no identifiable propulsion system and they did not know how it was actually staying in the air cruising at that altitude“
With every day that passes we inch closer to the Leon Singularity
😶
“Other pilots saying that when they looked at the object they could identify no identifiable propulsion system and they did not know how it was actually staying in the air cruising at that altitude“
Comments
This is like the dying years of the Major Government, but on steroids. Although in 1997 the Conservatives didn't have Brexit bonuses, a war with Russia, a Johnson redux and 30p Lee to save the day.
This is a punishment beating election for the Tories and people will vote for the party which will remove the Tory.
The Party surely wouldn't want an election and will do everything it can to keep him place until the GE.
Will be a good chance of an LD pick up then though.
We're supposed to be horrified that government ministers stayed in hotels whilst abroad on genuine government business. Shocked.
It's utterly stupid. They want to go after Tory sleaze and pocketing our money. I get that. This government is openly corrupt. So go after their corrupt contracts and coincidental peerages. Not minister stays in hotel "shock"
I'd always thought it was difficult to get on the list but it seems that in some places all you need is a mate on the Panel.
Sunak is a political pygmy compared to Major, who had the thumping mandate of having won a general election with a record number of votes.
Ok, so Starmer is also a pygmy compared to Blair, but Labour didn’t win the 1997 election, the Tories lost it. On current form, Sunak’s government is going to lose far more spectacularly that Major’s did.
Major managed to retain 165 Tory seats. That would be an astonishing achievement if Sunak manages to turn this around and get even within the ballpark of that mighty figure.
Latest MRP:
Our new large MRP poll with @FindoutnowUK for @Telegraph shows #Labour 25% ahead and the Conservatives set to get fewer seats than the SNP. Details at:
https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/blogs/ec_mrppoll_20230209.html
https://twitter.com/electcalculus/status/1623639165152772098?s=46&t=l6gkF4fesBN2abvCWfOHpA
Which activity isn’t de rigeur in Frome? Having two children?
One is that the location of Lib Dem votes is at least as important as the national total. The other is that a moderate Lab to Lib swing during this sort of election is often part of the playbook, as voters work out the best way to beat the Conservatives in their area.
But Ed D has been awfully quiet for a while.
On topic, how easily can Warburton string this out until the election? That's presumably his current plan. Like his many colleagues in the "Sleazy and Dumped" Party.
There is white-hot rage around about this tory Government. I have never known anything remotely close to this.
I think the most likely route to a by-election is him getting charged, pleading guilty to get some credit, and resigning as a result.
Hyufd The Hopeful keeps telling us of the poll evidence that indicates NOM as the likely GE outcome, but even the crude workings of Electoral Calculus are suggesting little more than 100 Tory MPs surviving the next GE. Nor do you have to a Labour or LD partisan to see why even this might be a serious overestimate.
For a start, there is tactical voting. Then there's the distinct possibility of an LD uplift in the polls when they begin to receive more publicity, as they normally do during a GE. Davey is no superstar but he is no mug either, and nor is Starmer. They are not going to have to dazzle to look preferable to the incumbents.
There is still a chance of a Tory recovery. Sunak is nothing if not sensible. If the Party plods on and avoids serious mistakes (like sacking him, for instance), if the economy improves a bit, if Labour begins to fragment and the Unions get too uppity, there is a chance the Tories get out of their current mess and escape with a decent rump of opposition MPs.
There is however at least as much chance that the opposite happens, in which case we really could be talking about near extinction and the SNP as HM Official Opposition.
Edit, I suppose the main difference today is the cases I have quoted span 50 years. We could have all those and more in a fortnight this Parliament.
So they should be more relaxed about corporate profits, defend the independent schools sector, present a fiscal stance of spending (and tax) discipline and noisily call for increased defence spending and military aid for Ukraine. Triangulate the Tories.
If they did this, the Tory shire disgruntleds might be motivated to vote for them rather than just stay at home. But I see no evidence they’re prepared to do this at a national level, mostly their policy is just naked opportunism or glib.
Predicted seat changes by MP
Some notable MPs are in danger of losing their seats, including the Prime Minister and fifteen other cabinet ministers:
Rishi Sunak (Richmond), Prime Minister
James Cleverly (Braintree), Foreign Secretary
Suella Braverman (Fareham), Home Secretary
Ben Wallace (Wyre and Preston North), Defence Secretary
Oliver Dowden (Hertsmere), Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Steve Barclay (Cambridgeshire North East), Health Secretary
Grant Shapps (Welwyn Hatfield), Energy
Mel Stride (Devon Central), Work and Pensions
Gillian Keegan (Chichester), Education
Therese Coffey (Suffolk Coastal), DEFRA
Mark Harper (Forest of Dean), Transport
Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry), Northern Ireland
Alister Jack (Dumfries and Galloway), Scotland
David TC Davies (Monmouth), Wales
Lucy Frazer (Cambridgeshire South East), DCMS
Penny Mordaunt (Portsmouth North), Leader of Commons
Also Boris Johnson (former Prime Minister), Liz Truss (former Prime Minister), and Kwasi Kwarteng (former Chancellor).
Must be quite an occasion for Seals everywhere.
If we create a political environment in which only the most thick-skinned and narcissistic people can thrive, it's no wonder that's what we get.
Where Ydoethur when you need him?
Mark's an honest Tory. There are few left. In fact I believe they may soon become a protected species.
In the current climate the tories are not going to get benefit of the doubt but it's still a waste if that is all there is to that story.
MM aside, there really is nothing left by which to justify this Conservative Government.
I sense that quite a few punters, blinded by recency bias, are approaching this all wrong. It's time to believe the polls. It's not about 'might a NOM be likely?' or about 'precedence' or about Sunak 'staging a recovery.'
They are going to be on the receiving end of the full wrath and vengeance of the electorate.
The real question is just how low the tories will sink. I've said 100-150 but it might be fewer.
I think the best tactic for the party is to focus very locally, and use the council elections, parliamentary by-elections and the next GE as the way to get back some ground in local government (where there is already good LD representation) and Westminster.
I see the party’s press comments, questions in parliament and TV interviews all the time because I follow their various accounts on Twitter. They are pretty active, but the press isn’t interested because they’re not an important part of todays narrative. I don’t think that matters currently.
They are very cautious on Political markets, and are apt to suspend them for lengthy periods which makes them a rather risky investment.
https://labourlist.org/2023/02/bolton-north-east-brings-labours-selection-process-back-under-scrutiny/
Reading it, it’s hardly a surprise its outcome was sub optimal, and that Putin thought he could get away with a second crack at Ukraine.
Exactly 8 years ago today Putin, Merkel, Hollande and Poroshenko met in Minsk's Palace of Independence to negotiate ceasefire and peace in Ukraine after Russia's invasion in 2014.
I was BY diplomat then and worked with the UA delegation. Here is my thread about that night.
https://twitter.com/PavelSlunkin/status/1624400616838529024
Even BJO seems to have given up recently.
Personally, I found most of the MP expenses scandal bordering on tragic. To give up any claim to probity for such trivial sums? But some, at least, were sucked in by what they were "entitled" to for all the crap they put up with. Now we seem to be seeing far more basic fraud and dishonesty. Its depressing and only the most one eyed can claim that any party is immune.
In my (now considerablle) experience, Governments operate best when there is a decent Opposition. I can't see the SNP providing that.
Personally I'd like to see the iniquitous FPTP system abolished and some form of voting system established that is more suited to a modern democracy. There is zilch chance of that if Labour has a 400 seat majority.
Stuart, Gove and others meeting Ollie Robbins - with the intention of agreeing a cross-party consensus on how to improve EU relations post-Brexit
Looks like:
- Big business agrees that Brexit has been lowest decile (compared with expectations)
- Stuart and Gove are trying to salvage Brexit 'gains' when Labour comes in
- Improving EU trade relations is a priority - better trading relationship wanted by business.
You do even there need to be reasonably thick skinned, and from time to time we try to acknowledge even most MPs are decent sorts trying to do some good, but it's such a toxic environment filled with loose morals and partisan shithousery which seems to be what we want to see, that it's a pretty unappealing prospect to join it.
Oh dear, I don't think I ever associated the sound with the spelling.
We're all Froomed captain Mainwaring?
David TC Davies (Monmouth), Wales
Beautiful.
There are no vetting procedures - I would be interested to find out if any party even uses a cursory background check. Let alone a full trawl through a CV, interview acquaintances from earlier days etc.
We are continuing to move away from having success outside politics first, to professional politicians. Aside from the issue of experience, there is no structure or definition to that career path.
Which means that someone can go from leaflet slinging to MP on the basis that out of x members of the local party, he/she is vaguely presentable and plausible.
In times past he would have been dragged onto the Council, long ago. Probably Parliament as well.
Less than zero interest…
Read the Frome, people.
Be funny if it led to a split though as everyone felt they were so far in front whipping broke down.
Ok, I'm doing me best.
"The energy and passion within our party is stronger than ever, and I truly believe that come election day, we will surprise everyone with a resounding victory. We have the policies and the people to bring real change to this country, and I won't give up on that just because of a few numbers on a page. I am, and always will be, a committed Conservative supporter, and I know that together, we will make history."
There's a three course meal of scandals already laid on, no need to fill up on snacks.
Seems to be working for him atm.
😶
“Other pilots saying that when they looked at the object they could identify no identifiable propulsion system and they did not know how it was actually staying in the air cruising at that altitude“
https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1624516331465764864?s=46&t=y5cVncRhs9tviY7xvk8Q3w
What is being shot down in North America?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/11/new-unidentified-object-shot-down-over-canada-says-trudeau