What REMAIN and LEAVE voters now think of Brexit – politicalbetting.com
Three years on from Brexit, what do Remain and Leave voters think?@JLPartnersPolls asked a 2,000 sample poll of UK adults for @InstituteGC how they would now sum up Brexit in a word ? pic.twitter.com/baNbhEQs4X
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Which merely shows what fools they are since we are now the tail being wagged by the EU dog. We have less choice than ever.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
"For you" for me seems to be loads of left wing shite.
Even disaster and shambles feature quite prominent for Leavers.
Who will flush the great Brexit turd?
I’m a Leaver and I think it has been a shambles and a disaster, in terms of the handling and the execution. Who could think otherwise? It has been a national humiliation, and the Tories deserve to be hurled into electoral perdition for this (and they will).. But I would vote Leave again, tomorrow - with great reluctance (as I did in 2026) - and for the same reasons. Sovereignty and democracy. The EU is still fundamentally undemocratic in a way the UK is not
Indeed the imminent thrashing of the Tories shows Brexit at work. We are governed by fools, frauds and flailing idiots. We are going to give them a terrible spanking and they will be suitably chided by this traumatic defeat. We cannot do that to the EU Commission. We cannot hand Ursula’s petite derrière to her on a Belgian plate
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Yes.
They seem to think you’re interested in right wing shite:
We recommend Tweets to you based on who you already follow and Topics you follow
HYUFD's point is really horrible if you think about it.
His point is that teachers should only earn the average salary or below it.
I ask, why? These people are raising the next generation of bankers, lawyers, software engineers, politicians...
How can you sit here and say what a teacher should or should not earn? It's exactly the same thing with train drivers, why shouldn't they earn £60K a year? Why should anyone ever earn anything?
Where did I say that? I said they already earn above the average salary and did not say that was a bad thing. Plus they get a good pension.
Indeed headteachers can earn up to 6 figure salaries.
However you can be a teacher in a state comprehensive or academy with a 2.2 from an ex polytechnic. Most banks and corporate law firms and tech firms demand at least a 2.1 from a Russell Group university and doctors need 7 years of medical school after top A levels.
That is why on average the latter pay more
Although TBF some very thick people get top degrees at Russell Group Unis, which shows it’s as much about snobbery as about academic rigour.
By definition they didn't due to the high A level and GCSE requirements of entry.
Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study
Some very thick people get top A-level grades too.
Are you suggesting that the likes of Tristram Hunt, Dominic Cummings, Naomi Wolfe and Jacob Rees-Mogg - to pick only our own subject - are intelligent? Because if so, I’m adding you to that list.
Edit - also, given the size of the Russell Group, your ‘top 10%’ claim is actually mathematically impossible.
They are all of above average intelligence on any definition. You just dislike their politics.
The Russell Group make up about a quarter of universities and as about 40% of 18 year olds go to university my 10% claim was correct
Leaving aside politics and the use of the term "intelligence", the statement that "Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study" is interesting.
@HYUFD - what you said later doesn't support this, because some people never study economics, for example, to any level, and so it doesn't make much sense to include them in the denominator.
I am in the top 10% of three-ball jugglers if we include in the denominator people who don't know how to juggle with three balls. I may well be in the bottom 10% if we don't.
But if we just look at A levels, and we assume "virtually" means "more than 80%", then what *is* a reasonable estimate for x in the statement that "virtually every Russell Group student is in the top x% academically of the subject they study"?
Presumably not many students get admitted to RG universities to study a subject if they only got a B or C in it at A Level?
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
"For you" for me seems to be loads of left wing shite.
It’s entirely conceivable that I might find tweets that you consider left wing shite to be right wing shite. We’re aw different.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Sometimes, not always - and I can't work out what determines that.
'For you' has actually improved slightly in the last couple of days for me. Again, not sure what's done that.
Weirdly, I find that both 'For You' and 'Following' are a mix of people I actually follow, tweets liked by people I follow, and random stuff. So now I have to look at both lines to see what I want to see (although I am moving more over to creating lists and using those to track people and topics - you don't gave to follow people to have them on a list, which saves a lot of hassle)
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Yes.
They seem to think you’re interested in right wing shite:
We recommend Tweets to you based on who you already follow and Topics you follow
Afaik I don’t follow any Topics and definitely don’t follow people like Murdo and Scotland’s greatest almost-emigré KC Roddy Dunlop who are always popping up in my timeline. I’d definitely take Twitter’s current guidelines with a pinch of salt,
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
. You can't infer that from the word cloud without a lot more information.
Word clouds are quick and fun (and sure, give some indication) but you'd need to do a lot more to get any kind of rigourous analysis - ideally not using a word cloud at all, of course. Even assuming a decent sample, you need to combine the words with the same meaning (e.g. 'disaster' and 'disastrous' for remain) set out how the sizing is done, remove irrelevant phrases such as 'european union' and deal with context such (the remain cloud for example could be a big majority using many variations on 'not a' in 'not a disaster' so that 'disaster' is the only word that gets big (I don't believe this to be the case, for avoidance of doubt).
Even if the scaling is 2d-linear with mentions, 'freedom' is much less than 'most' of the size of that word cloud.
Even disaster and shambles feature quite prominent for Leavers.
Who will flush the great Brexit turd?
I’m a Leaver and I think it has been a shambles and a disaster, in terms of the handling and the execution. Who could think otherwise? It has been a national humiliation, and the Tories deserve to be hurled into electoral perdition for this (and they will).. But I would vote Leave again, tomorrow - with great reluctance (as I did in 2026) - and for the same reasons. Sovereignty and democracy. The EU is still fundamentally undemocratic in a way the UK is not
Indeed the imminent thrashing of the Tories shows Brexit at work. We are governed by fools, frauds and flailing idiots. We are going to give them a terrible spanking and they will be suitably chided by this traumatic defeat. We cannot do that to the EU Commission. We cannot hand Ursula’s petite derrière to her on a Belgian plate
Thus: Brexit. The right decision
No wheels on my wagon ... and I'm still rolling along.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Lol. You’re like those people who complain they are getting online adverts for donkey porn. It’s nearly always because you’ve been searching for “nude pictures of sexy donkeys”
If “For You” is serving up a menu of right wing bollocks that strongly suggests you are looking for this stuff. I will be charitable and assume this is because you like to be outraged by it, then you righteously dish it up here. Which is precisely what you do
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Brexit's led to a bunch of direct costs for us as an exporting business. Just a big headache really.
Same.
It’s the buggeration factor is annoying with the only benefit is I’ve got a few pay rises because of it.
I've found shipping to the EU generally a day slower but much more reliable, it now much more rarely goes beyond that extra day. It's also improved our shipping to non-EU destinations (including places like Jersey) because the customs stuff is much more practiced - on the part of the logistics companies we use as well as out own.
"Policing is a difficult job with a simple mission: to keep the public safe", @SuellaBraverman says. But "insisting on recruits having degrees" - as the College of Policing is doing - is "an example of pointless red tape" which she aims to scrap.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Lol. You’re like those people who complain they are getting online adverts for donkey porn. It’s nearly always because you’ve been searching for “nude pictures of sexy donkeys”
If “For You” is serving up a menu of right wing bollocks that strongly suggests you are looking for this stuff. I will be charitable and assume this is because you like to be outraged by it, then you righteously dish it up here. Which is precisely what you do
Praise indeed from PB’s very own Twitter conspiracy bollocks correspondent.
HYUFD's point is really horrible if you think about it.
His point is that teachers should only earn the average salary or below it.
I ask, why? These people are raising the next generation of bankers, lawyers, software engineers, politicians...
How can you sit here and say what a teacher should or should not earn? It's exactly the same thing with train drivers, why shouldn't they earn £60K a year? Why should anyone ever earn anything?
Where did I say that? I said they already earn above the average salary and did not say that was a bad thing. Plus they get a good pension.
Indeed headteachers can earn up to 6 figure salaries.
However you can be a teacher in a state comprehensive or academy with a 2.2 from an ex polytechnic. Most banks and corporate law firms and tech firms demand at least a 2.1 from a Russell Group university and doctors need 7 years of medical school after top A levels.
That is why on average the latter pay more
Although TBF some very thick people get top degrees at Russell Group Unis, which shows it’s as much about snobbery as about academic rigour.
By definition they didn't due to the high A level and GCSE requirements of entry.
Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study
Some very thick people get top A-level grades too.
Are you suggesting that the likes of Tristram Hunt, Dominic Cummings, Naomi Wolfe and Jacob Rees-Mogg - to pick only our own subject - are intelligent? Because if so, I’m adding you to that list.
Edit - also, given the size of the Russell Group, your ‘top 10%’ claim is actually mathematically impossible.
They are all of above average intelligence on any definition. You just dislike their politics.
The Russell Group make up about a quarter of universities and as about 40% of 18 year olds go to university my 10% claim was correct
Leaving aside politics and the use of the term "intelligence", the statement that "Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study" is interesting.
@HYUFD - what you said later doesn't support this, because some people never study economics, for example, to any level, and so it doesn't make much sense to include them in the denominator.
I am in the top 10% of three-ball jugglers if we include in the denominator people who don't know how to juggle with three balls. I may well be in the bottom 10% if we don't.
But if we just look at A levels, and we assume "virtually" means "more than 80%", then what *is* a reasonable estimate for x in the statement that "virtually every Russell Group student is in the top x% academically of the subject they study"?
Presumably not many students get admitted to RG universities to study a subject if they only got a B or C in it at A Level?
Yes virtually every Russell Group student will have A* or at least A grades in the subject they study at GCSE as well as A level at that university based on the entry grades to study it there.
So my statement that virtually every Russell Group student will be in the top 10% of the subject they study was absolutely correct
HYUFD's point is really horrible if you think about it.
His point is that teachers should only earn the average salary or below it.
I ask, why? These people are raising the next generation of bankers, lawyers, software engineers, politicians...
How can you sit here and say what a teacher should or should not earn? It's exactly the same thing with train drivers, why shouldn't they earn £60K a year? Why should anyone ever earn anything?
Where did I say that? I said they already earn above the average salary and did not say that was a bad thing. Plus they get a good pension.
Indeed headteachers can earn up to 6 figure salaries.
However you can be a teacher in a state comprehensive or academy with a 2.2 from an ex polytechnic. Most banks and corporate law firms and tech firms demand at least a 2.1 from a Russell Group university and doctors need 7 years of medical school after top A levels.
That is why on average the latter pay more
Although TBF some very thick people get top degrees at Russell Group Unis, which shows it’s as much about snobbery as about academic rigour.
By definition they didn't due to the high A level and GCSE requirements of entry.
Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study
Some very thick people get top A-level grades too.
Are you suggesting that the likes of Tristram Hunt, Dominic Cummings, Naomi Wolfe and Jacob Rees-Mogg - to pick only our own subject - are intelligent? Because if so, I’m adding you to that list.
Edit - also, given the size of the Russell Group, your ‘top 10%’ claim is actually mathematically impossible.
They are all of above average intelligence on any definition. You just dislike their politics.
The Russell Group make up about a quarter of universities and as about 40% of 18 year olds go to university my 10% claim was correct
Leaving aside politics and the use of the term "intelligence", the statement that "Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study" is interesting.
@HYUFD - what you said later doesn't support this, because some people never study economics, for example, to any level, and so it doesn't make much sense to include them in the denominator.
I am in the top 10% of three-ball jugglers if we include in the denominator people who don't know how to juggle with three balls. I may well be in the bottom 10% if we don't.
But if we just look at A levels, and we assume "virtually" means "more than 80%", then what *is* a reasonable estimate for x in the statement that "virtually every Russell Group student is in the top x% academically of the subject they study"?
Presumably not many students get admitted to RG universities to study a subject if they only got a B or C in it at A Level?
Yes virtually every Russell Group student will have A* or at least A grades in the subject they study at that university based on the entry grades to study it there.
So my statement that virtually every Russell Group student will be in the top 10% of the subject they study was absolutely correct
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Show me a post where I have attacked trans people.
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
Claude by Anthropic is one of the most intriguing AIs out there. It was Claude which produced that astonishing take on Poe’s The Raven. Which is one of the most scary and convincing examples yet, of the ability of AI to replace almost everything humans can do
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Because the Brexit advocates who have been running the country for the last three years have failed totally to demonstrate any benefits to Remain voters it does not require close to a majority of Leave voters to change their minds for there to be a fundamental shift in public opinion. It only requires a relatively small minority - and shambles and disaster are pretty big in that Leave word cloud. This and the changing electorate are the two major challenges for those who do not want a much closer relationship between the UK and the EU.
HYUFD's point is really horrible if you think about it.
His point is that teachers should only earn the average salary or below it.
I ask, why? These people are raising the next generation of bankers, lawyers, software engineers, politicians...
How can you sit here and say what a teacher should or should not earn? It's exactly the same thing with train drivers, why shouldn't they earn £60K a year? Why should anyone ever earn anything?
Where did I say that? I said they already earn above the average salary and did not say that was a bad thing. Plus they get a good pension.
Indeed headteachers can earn up to 6 figure salaries.
However you can be a teacher in a state comprehensive or academy with a 2.2 from an ex polytechnic. Most banks and corporate law firms and tech firms demand at least a 2.1 from a Russell Group university and doctors need 7 years of medical school after top A levels.
That is why on average the latter pay more
Although TBF some very thick people get top degrees at Russell Group Unis, which shows it’s as much about snobbery as about academic rigour.
By definition they didn't due to the high A level and GCSE requirements of entry.
Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study
Some very thick people get top A-level grades too.
Are you suggesting that the likes of Tristram Hunt, Dominic Cummings, Naomi Wolfe and Jacob Rees-Mogg - to pick only our own subject - are intelligent? Because if so, I’m adding you to that list.
Edit - also, given the size of the Russell Group, your ‘top 10%’ claim is actually mathematically impossible.
They are all of above average intelligence on any definition. You just dislike their politics.
The Russell Group make up about a quarter of universities and as about 40% of 18 year olds go to university my 10% claim was correct
Leaving aside politics and the use of the term "intelligence", the statement that "Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study" is interesting.
@HYUFD - what you said later doesn't support this, because some people never study economics, for example, to any level, and so it doesn't make much sense to include them in the denominator.
I am in the top 10% of three-ball jugglers if we include in the denominator people who don't know how to juggle with three balls. I may well be in the bottom 10% if we don't.
But if we just look at A levels, and we assume "virtually" means "more than 80%", then what *is* a reasonable estimate for x in the statement that "virtually every Russell Group student is in the top x% academically of the subject they study"?
Presumably not many students get admitted to RG universities to study a subject if they only got a B or C in it at A Level?
Yes virtually every Russell Group student will have A* or at least A grades in the subject they study at that university based on the entry grades to study it there.
So my statement that virtually every Russell Group student will be in the top 10% of the subject they study was absolutely correct
That's a brave conclusion from exam results.
No it isn't, only the top 10% get A* grades at A Level or got A* grades (now 9s) at GCSE.
Virtually every Russell Group student has an A* in the subject they study now
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Show me a post where I have attacked trans people.
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
What do YOU think of the Scottish GRR Bill?
Or don’t you have an opinion?
I already posted my views on this topic days ago. I think the commentary on this bill from you and others is entirely cynical and not about safety or anything else. We know this because you keep saying about how this is Sturgeon's big failure, that is what this is really about.
This issue is incredibly complicated, there is no perfect solution or answer. But I start from the position of love and compassion, not trying to vilify people to score points.
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Because the Brexit advocates who have been running the country for the last three years have failed totally to demonstrate any benefits to Remain voters it does not require close to a majority of Leave voters to change their minds for there to be a fundamental shift in public opinion. It only requires a relatively small minority - and shambles and disaster are pretty big in that Leave word cloud. This and the changing electorate are the two major challenges for those who do not want a much closer relationship between the UK and the EU.
As I posted earlier wages have risen for the lowest paid.
The fact some Remainers don't give a toss about the British born lowest paid doesn't change that.
After avoiding this place all morning because of trans arguments and ChatPT/AI waffle, I had faint hopes a new thread would clear the decks. No, of course not, what Was I thinking. For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
HYUFD's point is really horrible if you think about it.
His point is that teachers should only earn the average salary or below it.
I ask, why? These people are raising the next generation of bankers, lawyers, software engineers, politicians...
How can you sit here and say what a teacher should or should not earn? It's exactly the same thing with train drivers, why shouldn't they earn £60K a year? Why should anyone ever earn anything?
Where did I say that? I said they already earn above the average salary and did not say that was a bad thing. Plus they get a good pension.
Indeed headteachers can earn up to 6 figure salaries.
However you can be a teacher in a state comprehensive or academy with a 2.2 from an ex polytechnic. Most banks and corporate law firms and tech firms demand at least a 2.1 from a Russell Group university and doctors need 7 years of medical school after top A levels.
That is why on average the latter pay more
Although TBF some very thick people get top degrees at Russell Group Unis, which shows it’s as much about snobbery as about academic rigour.
By definition they didn't due to the high A level and GCSE requirements of entry.
Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study
Some very thick people get top A-level grades too.
Are you suggesting that the likes of Tristram Hunt, Dominic Cummings, Naomi Wolfe and Jacob Rees-Mogg - to pick only our own subject - are intelligent? Because if so, I’m adding you to that list.
Edit - also, given the size of the Russell Group, your ‘top 10%’ claim is actually mathematically impossible.
They are all of above average intelligence on any definition. You just dislike their politics.
The Russell Group make up about a quarter of universities and as about 40% of 18 year olds go to university my 10% claim was correct
Leaving aside politics and the use of the term "intelligence", the statement that "Virtually every Russell Group student is certainly in the top 10% academically of the subject they study" is interesting.
@HYUFD - what you said later doesn't support this, because some people never study economics, for example, to any level, and so it doesn't make much sense to include them in the denominator.
I am in the top 10% of three-ball jugglers if we include in the denominator people who don't know how to juggle with three balls. I may well be in the bottom 10% if we don't.
But if we just look at A levels, and we assume "virtually" means "more than 80%", then what *is* a reasonable estimate for x in the statement that "virtually every Russell Group student is in the top x% academically of the subject they study"?
Presumably not many students get admitted to RG universities to study a subject if they only got a B or C in it at A Level?
Yes virtually every Russell Group student will have A* or at least A grades in the subject they study at that university based on the entry grades to study it there.
So my statement that virtually every Russell Group student will be in the top 10% of the subject they study was absolutely correct
That's a brave conclusion from exam results.
No it isn't, only the top 10% get A* grades at A Level or got A* grades (now 1s) at GCSE.
Virtually every Russell Group student has an A* in the subject they study now
It’s the details that always get you in the end…
ETA sorry HY I thought I had emboldened something but didn’t, now have.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Because the Brexit advocates who have been running the country for the last three years have failed totally to demonstrate any benefits to Remain voters it does not require close to a majority of Leave voters to change their minds for there to be a fundamental shift in public opinion. It only requires a relatively small minority - and shambles and disaster are pretty big in that Leave word cloud. This and the changing electorate are the two major challenges for those who do not want a much closer relationship between the UK and the EU.
As I posted earlier wages have risen for the lowest paid.
The fact some Remainers don't give a toss about the British born lowest paid doesn't change that.
Nor does a few swing voters switching from Leave to Remain
I wish the Tories luck with running on a platform of looking after the interests of low paid workers. I imagine it will be just as successful as attempts to show that the Brexit they chose has been a triumph.
After avoiding this place all morning because of trans arguments and ChatPT/AI waffle, I had faint hopes a new thread would clear the decks. No, of course not, what Was I thinking. For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
One of the hidden costs of Brexit is now being counted.
For a couple of years the machinery of Government was snarled up by negotiations and preparations for the Big Day. Meanwhile just about every day to day concern from Hospital Waiting Lists to Holes In The Road got put on the back burner.
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Because the Brexit advocates who have been running the country for the last three years have failed totally to demonstrate any benefits to Remain voters it does not require close to a majority of Leave voters to change their minds for there to be a fundamental shift in public opinion. It only requires a relatively small minority - and shambles and disaster are pretty big in that Leave word cloud. This and the changing electorate are the two major challenges for those who do not want a much closer relationship between the UK and the EU.
"Shambles, disaster, mistake" are prominent in both word clouds. There is clearly some common ground...
After avoiding this place all morning because of trans arguments and ChatPT/AI waffle, I had faint hopes a new thread would clear the decks. No, of course not, what Was I thinking. For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
You are one of the most boring, pointless, invisible posters on here. Why the fuck should anyone give a toss what you think?
Seriously. 306 comments, In total
You’re like a stranger bursting into a local boozer and shouting at the regulars: I DEMAND YOU STOP PLAYING DARTS
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
Because the Brexit advocates who have been running the country for the last three years have failed totally to demonstrate any benefits to Remain voters it does not require close to a majority of Leave voters to change their minds for there to be a fundamental shift in public opinion. It only requires a relatively small minority - and shambles and disaster are pretty big in that Leave word cloud. This and the changing electorate are the two major challenges for those who do not want a much closer relationship between the UK and the EU.
"Shambles, disaster, mistake" are prominent in both word clouds. There is clearly some common ground...
Indeed. And it is not good for those who back the Brexit the government chose.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires 2 A grades.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
After avoiding this place all morning because of trans arguments and ChatPT/AI waffle, I had faint hopes a new thread would clear the decks. No, of course not, what Was I thinking. For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
You are one of the most boring, pointless, invisible posters on here. Why the fuck should anyone give a toss what you think?
Seriously. 380 comments, In total
You’re like a stranger bursting into a local boozer and shouting at the regulars: I DEMAND YOU STOP PLAYING DARTS
It's the kinder, gentler Leon today, I see. You should think twice before disparaging readers. Some day you might be a writer...
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Show me a post where I have attacked trans people.
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
What do YOU think of the Scottish GRR Bill?
Or don’t you have an opinion?
I already posted my views on this topic days ago. I think the commentary on this bill from you and others is entirely cynical and not about safety or anything else. We know this because you keep saying about how this is Sturgeon's big failure, that is what this is really about.
This issue is incredibly complicated, there is no perfect solution or answer. But I start from the position of love and compassion, not trying to vilify people to score points.
Aww ❤️ that's nice. But not putting multiple rapists in women's prisons looks pretty uncomplicated to me.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
"Policing is a difficult job with a simple mission: to keep the public safe", @SuellaBraverman says. But "insisting on recruits having degrees" - as the College of Policing is doing - is "an example of pointless red tape" which she aims to scrap.
She's playing to the gallery again imo. The proposal (I think?) isn't that you have to have a degree to apply, it's that recruits are expected to do some further study on various things once in the force. The goal is to make it less likely that those wanting to become a policeman for the macho bantz and the buzz of throwing their weight around get in. So it seeks to address one of the biggests issues the police have - the calibre and mindset of their people.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Lol. You’re like those people who complain they are getting online adverts for donkey porn. It’s nearly always because you’ve been searching for “nude pictures of sexy donkeys”
If “For You” is serving up a menu of right wing bollocks that strongly suggests you are looking for this stuff. I will be charitable and assume this is because you like to be outraged by it, then you righteously dish it up here. Which is precisely what you do
"But there isn’t going to be another vote" @MikeSmithson
Of COURSE there is going to be another vote.
It's just a question of when, not if.
After the trauma of Brexit - and it has been traumatic whatever your stance - it will take an incredibly brave and powerful government to risk all that again
It is not impossible. I just can’t see the circumstances arising where it would be feasible, in the medium term
Remoaners will try and take us back in by salami slicing Brexit until it is almost meaningless, without ever going the whole hog. OGH is right
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Show me a post where I have attacked trans people.
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
What do YOU think of the Scottish GRR Bill?
Or don’t you have an opinion?
I already posted my views on this topic days ago. I think the commentary on this bill from you and others is entirely cynical and not about safety or anything else. We know this because you keep saying about how this is Sturgeon's big failure, that is what this is really about.
This issue is incredibly complicated, there is no perfect solution or answer. But I start from the position of love and compassion, not trying to vilify people to score points.
Aww ❤️ that's nice. But not putting multiple rapists in women's prisons looks pretty uncomplicated to me.
I was asked about single sex spaces.
If you transitioned to the female gender at 20 years old and you'd be in that state for thirty years, do you honestly believe that person should not be able to use female toilets? You see, it is complicated.
After avoiding this place all morning because of trans arguments and ChatPT/AI waffle, I had faint hopes a new thread would clear the decks. No, of course not, what Was I thinking. For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
You are one of the most boring, pointless, invisible posters on here. Why the fuck should anyone give a toss what you think?
Seriously. 380 comments, In total
You’re like a stranger bursting into a local boozer and shouting at the regulars: I DEMAND YOU STOP PLAYING DARTS
Goodness Leon love, some consistency please. You like me and I have only 12 comments.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
In future, grades will be encrypted in blockchains so that grade inflation cannot be checked or reported on. Each student can purchase a decryption key for an additional £9,000 in student loans...
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
He seems to decide to stay out of the trans debate, because he realises how utterly toxic it is. There is hope I might yet vote for your party if you're ever in a position of power.
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Show me a post where I have attacked trans people.
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
What do YOU think of the Scottish GRR Bill?
Or don’t you have an opinion?
I already posted my views on this topic days ago. I think the commentary on this bill from you and others is entirely cynical and not about safety or anything else. We know this because you keep saying about how this is Sturgeon's big failure, that is what this is really about.
This issue is incredibly complicated, there is no perfect solution or answer. But I start from the position of love and compassion, not trying to vilify people to score points.
So, no quote of an attack by me on trans people. No acceptance that the politician leading the proposed change is responsible for the problem, but you’re quite happy to vilify me to score points.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
After avoiding this place all morning because of trans arguments and ChatPT/AI waffle, I had faint hopes a new thread would clear the decks. No, of course not, what Was I thinking. For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
You are one of the most boring, pointless, invisible posters on here. Why the fuck should anyone give a toss what you think?
Seriously. 380 comments, In total
You’re like a stranger bursting into a local boozer and shouting at the regulars: I DEMAND YOU STOP PLAYING DARTS
It's the kinder, gentler Leon today, I see. You should think twice before disparaging readers. Some day you might be a writer...
I’m defending US! The regulars. The people who actually comment and make the threads interesting - whether you are Scot Nit or UKIPPER, Leaver or Remoaner, @HYUFD or @CorrectHorseBattery, or all and any points in between
Lurkers who never contribute have no right to make any demands, whatsoever
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
Si most of the 52% who voted Leave still think above all Brexit gives freedom. Not much sign of rejoin from them, even if Remainers still mostly think it was a disaster
. You can't infer that from the word cloud without a lot more information.
Word clouds are quick and fun (and sure, give some indication) but you'd need to do a lot more to get any kind of rigourous analysis - ideally not using a word cloud at all, of course. Even assuming a decent sample, you need to combine the words with the same meaning (e.g. 'disaster' and 'disastrous' for remain) set out how the sizing is done, remove irrelevant phrases such as 'european union' and deal with context such (the remain cloud for example could be a big majority using many variations on 'not a' in 'not a disaster' so that 'disaster' is the only word that gets big (I don't believe this to be the case, for avoidance of doubt).
Even if the scaling is 2d-linear with mentions, 'freedom' is much less than 'most' of the size of that word cloud.
I think we need to see the vocabulary that was offered before we can reach any conclusions.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
I suspect the algorithm writer doesn't have finely-tuned antennae, and thinks that if you show an interest in politics then you'll want the thoughts of Nigel Farage and other right-wing zealots. "But aren't there different kinds of politics?" is a question that will get dismissed as "Oh, too complicated, go away nerd".
It's not totally wrong, anyway. I'd be more interested in what Farage is saying than e.g. what Kim Kardashian says, wouldn't you?
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
No, as Queen Mary is the lowest ranked of the Russell Group universities in league tables.
The average will be A* in the subject studied, like Durham
If the average grade is an A*, what are the grades above it? An average cannot be at the top of a range of more than one value.
Pedantry alert Yes it can. For discreet data, often the most (only) sensible average to use is the median or mode (you can’t have a grade halfway between an A* and an A). If most grades are A*, both the median and the mode will be this.
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
Yes, and I’ve said so many times. They already have rights under the law.
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
Yet every post you make seems to attack them.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
Show me a post where I have attacked trans people.
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
What do YOU think of the Scottish GRR Bill?
Or don’t you have an opinion?
I already posted my views on this topic days ago. I think the commentary on this bill from you and others is entirely cynical and not about safety or anything else. We know this because you keep saying about how this is Sturgeon's big failure, that is what this is really about.
This issue is incredibly complicated, there is no perfect solution or answer. But I start from the position of love and compassion, not trying to vilify people to score points.
So, no quote of an attack by me on trans people. No acceptance that the politician leading the proposed change is responsible for the problem, but you’re quite happy to vilify me to score points.
Nicola Sturgeon is not responsible for women using single sex spaces which is what you asked me.
Answer my question: if a man has transitioned completely to being a woman (gender), can they EVER use single sex spaces?
He seems to decide to stay out of the trans debate, because he realises how utterly toxic it is. There is hope I might yet vote for your party if you're ever in a position of power.
But it is not toxic at all. The Scottish debate is ENTIRELY about men who are not in fact trans, pretending to be trans, so that they can assault women. I am happy to believe that no genuinely m to f trans person would dream of doing such a thing. You apparently are not.
@CarlottaVance do you believe trans people deserve our love and compassion and do you think they are deserving of rights under the law?
There is an assumption in your question that trans people currently are denied legal rights that other groups have.
This is not correct. Since 2004 trans people, as defined in the GRA, have had exactly the same legal rights as every other group. See also the 2010 Equality Act.
@CarlottaVance does not attack trans people. But she does criticise a Bill which:- - is poorly thought out (as Sturgeon's latest actions show) - badly drafted - unsupported by Scottish people - according to opinion polls - has been criticised by 2 different UN Rapporteurs on Sexual Violence against Women and Torture - removes existing legal safeguards for others impacted by gender recognition - has resulted in one of her own Ministers resigning and some SNP MSPs voting against and - has led to a potential constitutional clash with Westminster over devolution.
By some accounts there has also been a drop in SNP membership in the last 2 months while the Bill has been going through Holyrood, though that may be a coincidence.
It has also resulted in - - the Labour Shadow Home Secretary publicly stating a view at odds with what members of the Shadow Cabinet have said in the past on the topic - the Labour leader distancing himself from some of the Bill's provisions (suggesting a possible clash with Scottish Labour) and - criticism of him by Labour MPs and peers and papers such as the Guardian for his failure to be tough on misogyny within the party he leads.
By any standards it is a political story worth commenting on.
It is certainly as interesting as arguments about the standards of the Brexit referendum campaigns in 2016 which are regularly - and tediously - rehashed on here.
Incidentally - and this may be relevant to any future independence referendum - the Bill gives the right to self-ID to anyone born in Scotland. During the last referendum, the vote was restricted to those living in Scotland. If there is a second referendum, will the vote be extended to those born in Scotland in the same way as for GRR. And if not, why not?
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Yes.
They seem to think you’re interested in right wing shite:
We recommend Tweets to you based on who you already follow and Topics you follow
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
No, as Queen Mary is the lowest ranked of the Russell Group universities in league tables.
The average will be A* in the subject studied, like Durham
If the average grade is an A*, what are the grades above it? An average cannot be at the top of a range of more than one value.
Pedantry alert Yes it can. For discreet data, often the most (only) sensible average to use is the median or mode (you can’t have a grade halfway between an A* and an A). If most grades are A*, both the median and the mode will be this.
He seems to decide to stay out of the trans debate, because he realises how utterly toxic it is. There is hope I might yet vote for your party if you're ever in a position of power.
But it is not toxic at all. The Scottish debate is ENTIRELY about men who are not in fact trans, pretending to be trans, so that they can assault women. I am happy to believe that no genuinely m to f trans person would dream of doing such a thing. You apparently are not.
No, it's not toxic. Nor is it of much relevance to all but a tiny percentage of the population.
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
I suspect the algorithm writer doesn't have finely-tuned antennae, and thinks that if you show an interest in politics then you'll want the thoughts of Nigel Farage and other right-wing zealots. "But aren't there different kinds of politics?" is a question that will get dismissed as "Oh, too complicated, go away nerd".
It's not totally wrong, anyway. I'd be more interested in what Farage is saying than e.g. what Kim Kardashian says, wouldn't you?
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
So even Queen Mary, one of the lowest ranked Russell Group universities requires an A grade.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
No, as Queen Mary is the lowest ranked of the Russell Group universities in league tables.
The average will be A* in the subject studied, like Durham
If the average grade is an A*, what are the grades above it? An average cannot be at the top of a range of more than one value.
Pedantry alert Yes it can. For discreet data, often the most (only) sensible average to use is the median or mode (you can’t have a grade halfway between an A* and an A). If most grades are A*, both the median and the mode will be this.
A* = 1 A = 2 B = 3 etc
Calculate mean.
Convert back into grade (eg, 3.7 is between B and C, closer to a C).
Will probably give you an outcome that's as least as useful as the median, and more useful than the mode (which is very prone to being affected by data artefacts).
Sometimes it's useful to know that the expected outcome from a die roll is 3.5; sometimes it's not...
Comments
Who will flush the great Brexit turd?
I know some on here think British workers in those areas are ghastly xenephobic oiks, but they got what they wanted from their Leave vote
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-sees-fastest-wage-rises-sectors-most-reliant-eu-workers-indeed-2022-02-25/
Does Twitter now default to ‘For you’ (loads of advertising and right wing shite) and ‘Following’ (tweets over which one might have exerted a minimal amount of selectivity)? Annoying if so.
Any suggestions?
Indeed the imminent thrashing of the Tories shows Brexit at work. We are governed by fools, frauds and flailing idiots. We are going to give them a terrible spanking and they will be suitably chided by this traumatic defeat. We cannot do that to the EU Commission. We cannot hand Ursula’s petite derrière to her on a Belgian plate
Thus: Brexit. The right decision
They seem to think you’re interested in right wing shite:
We recommend Tweets to you based on who you already follow and Topics you follow
https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/twitter-timeline
@HYUFD - what you said later doesn't support this, because some people never study economics, for example, to any level, and so it doesn't make much sense to include them in the denominator.
I am in the top 10% of three-ball jugglers if we include in the denominator people who don't know how to juggle with three balls. I may well be in the bottom 10% if we don't.
But if we just look at A levels, and we assume "virtually" means "more than 80%", then what *is* a reasonable estimate for x in the statement that "virtually every Russell Group student is in the top x% academically of the subject they study"?
Presumably not many students get admitted to RG universities to study a subject if they only got a B or C in it at A Level?
'Freedom disaster shambles' is, as noted yesterday, an almost perfect description.
'For you' has actually improved slightly in the last couple of days for me. Again, not sure what's done that.
It’s the buggeration factor is annoying with the only benefit is I’ve got a few pay rises because of it.
I’d definitely take Twitter’s current guidelines with a pinch of salt,
The discussion is about a badly drafted Scottish Bill that could compromise women’s rights to single sex spaces established by the Equality Act which is a U.K. wide matter and the responsibility of the U.K. government.
What’s your view on the Scottish GRR Bill?
You can't infer that from the word cloud without a lot more information.
Word clouds are quick and fun (and sure, give some indication) but you'd need to do a lot more to get any kind of rigourous analysis - ideally not using a word cloud at all, of course. Even assuming a decent sample, you need to combine the words with the same meaning (e.g. 'disaster' and 'disastrous' for remain) set out how the sizing is done, remove irrelevant phrases such as 'european union' and deal with context such (the remain cloud for example could be a big majority using many variations on 'not a' in 'not a disaster' so that 'disaster' is the only word that gets big (I don't believe this to be the case, for avoidance of doubt).
Even if the scaling is 2d-linear with mentions, 'freedom' is much less than 'most' of the size of that word cloud.
If “For You” is serving up a menu of right wing bollocks that strongly suggests you are looking for this stuff. I will be charitable and assume this is because you like to be outraged by it, then you righteously dish it up here. Which is precisely what you do
Astounding* answer by @AnthropicAI.
https://twitter.com/TimSuzman/status/1620595596368429056
*Certainly interesting, anyhow.
Let's be honest, if the Tories were proposing this bill you'd be telling us how wonderful it was. You are the most partisan poster on this entire site, actually worse than HYUFD.
@SuellaBraverman says. But "insisting on recruits having degrees" - as the College of Policing is doing - is "an example of pointless red tape" which she aims to scrap.
https://twitter.com/ConHome/status/1620764698009550848
Time to turn the tables on the gloom-mongers, and exploit the benefits of Brexit. Remember that vaccine rollout! Happy Brexit Day!
https://twitter.com/BorisJohnson/status/1620422171637211137
The Government is currently trying to curtail the right to protest. What could be more undemocratic than that?
So my statement that virtually every Russell Group student will be in the top 10% of the subject they study was absolutely correct
Once again, directly to ad hom.
Why is a position supported by Labour and SNP MPs a Tory one?
What do YOU think of the Scottish GRR Bill?
Or don’t you have an opinion?
Virtually every Russell Group student has an A* in the subject they study now
This issue is incredibly complicated, there is no perfect solution or answer. But I start from the position of love and compassion, not trying to vilify people to score points.
The fact some Remainers don't give a toss about the British born lowest paid doesn't change that.
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-sees-fastest-wage-rises-sectors-most-reliant-eu-workers-indeed-2022-02-25/
Nor does a few swing voters switching from Leave to Remain
For the love of all that's holy, can we not just having a standing discussion thread for each of those and shunt them off there so non-obsessives can actually find the interesting topics.
ETA sorry HY I thought I had emboldened something but didn’t, now have.
It’s just registering in so many jurisdictions that’s the pain.
I’d say nice things about Max Verstappen if we could have passporting back.
Problem for him is I’m not convinced anyones listening anymore.
Grades AAB at A-Level. Alternatively, A-Level grades ABB including either A-Level Mathematics or Computer Science. Excludes General Studies and Critical Thinking.
Oh dear.
For a couple of years the machinery of Government was snarled up by negotiations and preparations for the Big Day. Meanwhile just about every day to day concern from Hospital Waiting Lists to Holes In The Road got put on the back burner.
That comes at a price that we are now paying.
Seriously. 306 comments, In total
You’re like a stranger bursting into a local boozer and shouting at the regulars: I DEMAND YOU STOP PLAYING DARTS
Of COURSE there is going to be another vote.
It's just a question of when, not if.
Durham University requires an A* in Maths or further Maths to study it.
https://www.durham.ac.uk/study/courses/g100/
I would expect even Queen Mary Maths students have a 9 at GCSE too, clearly putting them in the top 10%
You should think twice before disparaging readers. Some day you might be a writer...
I hate Brexit and everything it stands for - but I am very confident we will never have a vote to rejoin. Too divisive.
We'll end up like Switzerland.
It’s just when you operate in virtually every EU country the paperwork is a nightmare.
Unlike Zahawi we cannot have careless mistakes.
YOU WERE WRONG
. .
It is not impossible. I just can’t see the circumstances arising where it would be feasible, in the medium term
Remoaners will try and take us back in by salami slicing Brexit until it is almost meaningless, without ever going the whole hog. OGH is right
If you transitioned to the female gender at 20 years old and you'd be in that state for thirty years, do you honestly believe that person should not be able to use female toilets? You see, it is complicated.
Can I have some of your bucket of vitriol please?
The average will be A* in the subject studied, like Durham
He seems to decide to stay out of the trans debate, because he realises how utterly toxic it is. There is hope I might yet vote for your party if you're ever in a position of power.
They require a B in Computer Science, read what I said.
This is why people find you frustrating, just accept you were wrong.
Lurkers who never contribute have no right to make any demands, whatsoever
https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ugstudy/course/Computer-Science-BSc
AAA if you have an A in computer science/computing
You are wrong!
A son of a good friend of mine got into Nottingham with ABB for Comp Sci two years ago. Ok an odd year but still.
It's not totally wrong, anyway. I'd be more interested in what Farage is saying than e.g. what Kim Kardashian says, wouldn't you?
Yes it can. For discreet data, often the most (only) sensible average to use is the median or mode (you can’t have a grade halfway between an A* and an A). If most grades are A*, both the median and the mode will be this.
Answer my question: if a man has transitioned completely to being a woman (gender), can they EVER use single sex spaces?
And if not, why not? What is the issue?
This is not correct. Since 2004 trans people, as defined in the GRA, have had exactly the same legal rights as every other group. See also the 2010 Equality Act.
@CarlottaVance does not attack trans people. But she does criticise a Bill which:-
- is poorly thought out (as Sturgeon's latest actions show)
- badly drafted
- unsupported by Scottish people - according to opinion polls
- has been criticised by 2 different UN Rapporteurs on Sexual Violence against Women and Torture
- removes existing legal safeguards for others impacted by gender recognition
- has resulted in one of her own Ministers resigning and some SNP MSPs voting against and
- has led to a potential constitutional clash with Westminster over devolution.
By some accounts there has also been a drop in SNP membership in the last 2 months while the Bill has been going through Holyrood, though that may be a coincidence.
It has also resulted in -
- the Labour Shadow Home Secretary publicly stating a view at odds with what members of the Shadow Cabinet have said in the past on the topic
- the Labour leader distancing himself from some of the Bill's provisions (suggesting a possible clash with Scottish Labour) and
- criticism of him by Labour MPs and peers and papers such as the Guardian for his failure to be tough on misogyny within the party he leads.
By any standards it is a political story worth commenting on.
It is certainly as interesting as arguments about the standards of the Brexit referendum campaigns in 2016 which are regularly - and tediously - rehashed on here.
Incidentally - and this may be relevant to any future independence referendum - the Bill gives the right to self-ID to anyone born in Scotland. During the last referendum, the vote was restricted to those living in Scotland. If there is a second referendum, will the vote be extended to those born in Scotland in the same way as for GRR. And if not, why not?
Discreet for discrete. Dearie me.
As you say even ABB was below the usual year Nottingham A level requirements
My fault for trying to post on my phone whilst locked out of my own house!
I am rapidly losing patience with you mate.
You said most degrees require an A* in the subject they study now.
I've demonstrated two where that isn't true - Nottingham arguably has the best Comp Sci department in the country besides Cambridge.
Just accept you were wrong rather than gaslighting me. I've come out to bat for you so many times but this is making me jolly annoyed.
A = 2
B = 3
etc
Calculate mean.
Convert back into grade (eg, 3.7 is between B and C, closer to a C).
Will probably give you an outcome that's as least as useful as the median, and more useful than the mode (which is very prone to being affected by data artefacts).
Sometimes it's useful to know that the expected outcome from a die roll is 3.5; sometimes it's not...