Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

LAB is grossly over-priced in the GE majority betting – politicalbetting.com

15678911»

Comments

  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 53,425
    Eabhal said:

    In the queue in Edinburgh. 12 hours we've been told.

    The thing I would have done is to issue timed entry tickets online. This would regulate the numbers turning up, allow proper planning for the crowds and remove the need for standing in line for many hours.
  • IshmaelZ said:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-harry-andrew-uniform-queen-vigil-edinburgh-b2165653.html?amp

    Pedo boy gets to wear uniform, Harry not. This is KC humiliating his own son in favour of his trafficky brother because that's what wounded self importance looks like.

    Enough. Arsenic in his Epsom salts, and extra helpings for the Queen fucking Consort. What a monumental fucking shit.

    He wasn’t in uniform at the vigil this evening.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,972

    The Ukrainian General Staff are reporting that this is because Russian soldiers are refusing to be deployed to Ukraine. Even in units of volunteers that have been recently formed.

    The Russian War effort is teetering on the brink.
    If Kherson capitulates, the Special Operation over by the weekend.

    And Ukraine moves on to reclaim Crimea.

    And Putin will be teetering on a sixth floor balcony.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,282

    The thing I would have done is to issue timed entry tickets online. This would regulate the numbers turning up, allow proper planning for the crowds and remove the need for standing in line for many hours.
    Preventing the brits from queuing? What a monster.
  • TomsToms Posts: 2,478
    IshmaelZ said:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-harry-andrew-uniform-queen-vigil-edinburgh-b2165653.html?amp

    Pedo boy gets to wear uniform, Harry not. This is KC humiliating his own son in favour of his trafficky brother because that's what wounded self importance looks like.

    Enough. Arsenic in his Epsom salts, and extra helpings for the Queen fucking Consort. What a monumental fucking shit.

    "When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman?"
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,581
    Eabhal said:

    In the queue in Edinburgh. 12 hours we've been told.

    How many times does it go round, or zigzag, in the Meadows? ANd does it go into Bruntsfield Links?
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Toms said:

    "When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman?"
    Pedo boy vs being a bit of a twat, is a distinction I find very easy to make, as is my children vs my siblings. Charles is an adulterous shit, and the nation will agree with me this time next year.
  • He wasn’t in uniform at the vigil this evening.
    The Independent got its facts wrong and the monarchy lives to fight another day. Far enough though. Neither Andrew or Harry are serving in the military, so why should they be allowed to dress up when both have forfeited the ceremonial roles?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 18,307
    Toms said:

    "When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman?"
    Careful. There’s some on here would string you up for that one.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,581

    Careful. There’s some on here would string you up for that one.
    Some fantasise about quartering, too. And not the heraldic kind. Not acceptable.
  • MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,743

    The thing I would have done is to issue timed entry tickets online. This would regulate the numbers turning up, allow proper planning for the crowds and remove the need for standing in line for many hours.
    I thought the crowds are the spectacle.

    It would be terribly inconvenient if only the invited turned up. Might almost be the end of it all.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 18,307
    Very heavy shelling tonight… in Warminster! We are just on the edge of Salisbury plain, and the recent rain means the army can get their big guns out again. Wonder if it’s Ukrainian troops out training?
  • DynamoDynamo Posts: 651
    IshmaelZ said:

    Pedo boy vs being a bit of a twat, is a distinction I find very easy to make, as is my children vs my siblings. Charles is an adulterous shit, and the nation will agree with me this time next year.
    A decent father would be proud of the direction Harry has moved in in the past few years. The king has no f***ing idea how to be a husband, a father, a guy who's giving a speech at a meeting, etc. His nemesis awaits and he's going to meet it before next September.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,581

    Re the television- if a large chunk of the population was still stuck on the terrestrial 5 channels I’d be less likely to support the BBC dedicating most of the day to this - because I don’t actually think the constant coverage of death and despair is particularly great for peoples psyches.

    You’d have to be made of stern stuff to have gotten through the last 5 days having watched all or most of this - yes it’s a fascinating bit of history but it’s all death and endings and sadness and sorrow. At least with many more channels and online platforms now people can dip in and out of it.

    Luckily as much as some appear to like to protest otherwise it is relatively easy to escape from it all.

    If it hadn't been for the protesters some of us wouldn't have had anything to complain about!
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 29,635
    edited September 2022
    Leon said:

    For pb foodies - that dish is “deep fried homemade pork belly with lime zest and pickled chili peppers”. Eat it with superb sourdough and down it with a large glass of fine ice cold manzanilla

    Everything cuts through everything else. 10/10

    Costs £7

    The Spanish are now the best cooks in the world. Discuss

    What do you mean by "now"? Spain is not just tapas and paella. Did Ferran Adrià's El Bulli pass you by a dozen or more years back? Three Michelin Stars; best restaurant in the world; founders of molecular gastronomy. They even took Masterchef finalists there one year, iirc.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,641

    To include family or not to include family in political ads?

    In this area, there are three women candidates who are getting a lot of ad time, the state's senior senator, Democrat Patty Murray, Democrat Kim Schrier, the incumbent congresswoman in the swing 8th district, and Republican Tiffany Smiley, who is challenging Murray.

    All three women are married (happily as far as I know). Murray has two adult children, Schrier has one child, and Smiley has three young boys.

    You would not know about the Democratic women's families from their ads. Murray and Schrier never mention their husbands or children -- but Smiley's appear in most of her ads. That may be partly because she has a good story. After her husband lost his eyesight from a suicide bomber in Iraq, she had four guys to take care of, one blind, and three quite young. But Murray's and Schrier's missing families in their ads have begun to puzzle me.

    (There is a detail about Dr. Schrier that may interest, for example, Dr. Foxy: In her first campaign, she was accused -- correctly as far as I know -- of refusing to accept Medicaid patients in her pediatric practice. Medicaid, of course, is the US program for poor folks.)

    It's one quite marked difference between the US and UK. I can't remember the last time I learned anything about a local politician's partner or children - in fact, I don't know whether several of my close colleagues have any of either, and the general public certainly don't have any idea either. It seems intrusive to ask and ostentatious (bordering on misuse of children) to flaunt them. In the US, although as you say not universal, it seems quite common.
  • Dynamo said:

    A decent father would be proud of the direction Harry has moved in in the past few years. The king has no f***ing idea how to be a husband, a father, a guy who's giving a speech at a meeting, etc. His nemesis awaits and he's going to meet it before next September.
    That may be true but is put into the shadow by Boris. No-one cares about adulterous prime ministers, and I doubt many more care about kings.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,109
    edited September 2022

    If Kherson capitulates, the Special Operation over by the weekend.

    And Ukraine moves on to reclaim Crimea.

    And Putin will be teetering on a sixth floor balcony.

    Someone mentioned upthread that Putin may scale down his ambitions to “the Donbass”.

    But Russia already look to be retreating from northern Donbass back toward the frontier pre-February.

    This is an astonishing disaster - military, diplomatic, strategic and of course humanitarian.
  • That may be true but is put into the shadow by Boris. No-one cares about adulterous prime ministers, and I doubt many more care about kings.
    Boris Johnson was never the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

    It is odd which bits of religious doctrines christians choose to ignore, adultery, yeah ok, homosexuality, lowest of the low.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,813
    Dynamo said:

    A decent father would be proud of the direction Harry has moved in in the past few years. The king has no f***ing idea how to be a husband, a father, a guy who's giving a speech at a meeting, etc. His nemesis awaits and he's going to meet it before next September.
    What's Harry got to do with Putin?

    I don't think anyone's suggested Di was shagging him.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 5,405
    kle4 said:

    Going to be funny when an FOI reveals they took the Queen's coffin down to London yesterday and the one in Edinburgh is a decoy.

    Even funnier. The King decrees that as Scotland have performed so well since last Thursday, the funeral will be held in Edinburgh.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,170
    edited September 2022

    Someone mentioned upthread that Putin may scale down his ambitions to “the Donbass”.

    But Russia look to be retreating from northern Donbass back toward the frontier pre-February.

    This is an astonishing disaster - military, diplomatic, strategic and of course humanitarian.
    I said a few weeks ago I was planning on doing a piece on comparing Russia/Putin to Japan 1941/Hirohito/Hideki Tojo
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    kle4 said:

    Whilst forward thinking is a good thing in general, I do think this is expecting a bit too much of people. Is it really so unreasonable for people to be overwhelmingly focused on achieving the first step, victory for Ukraine? That, despite excellent news this week, is not exactly guaranteed, certainly not for all parts of Ukraine to be liberated.

    I mean, if I am in a rapidly sinking boat I should still be worried about what direction I am headed, but I'd be a little busy trying to stay afloat to give it much thought.
    I get that, and take some satisfaction from the setbacks that Russia are experiencing.
    But this 'victory' is also something that we have created, by providing guns and training to Ukraine, so we have to work out what the long term goals are.
    What are they? I don't think we know. Hence the idiocy of this suggestion 'embrace the chaos'.

  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,645
    Dynamo said:

    The king won't last long. Harry isn't stupid and he has a backbone. He has matured amazingly since his Nazi uniform idiocy, the Las Vegas business, and Afghanistan. His spoilt toe-rag of a father will never mature.

    What if...just imagine...Harry were to have written a few alternative versions of one of the chapters in his book...and he chooses the one that really gives his father the almighty kick in the b*llocks he deserves and he leaks a copy later this week? Bye-bye kingy. Bye-bye monarchy. Go for it, Harry.

    All the build-up is in one direction. All the other side have got is to print articles saying trillions of admirers are flocking the streets, blah blah. They've got absolutely nothing else - oh, some stuff about the late queen. WTF has she got to do with anything?
    Sorry to disappoint but while Diana's son and heirs are in line the monarchy is secure.

    As far as KCIII is concerned he's going to be an unpopular monarch but the people will tolerate him while they wait for William and Catherine - the true heirs - to ascend.
  • stodge said:

    No, my friend. I live in the most Labour of areas but I'm not a supporter.

    That being said, currently, I'd much prefer a Government led by Starmer to one led by Truss.
    Ah, may I ask how you swing? You are one of the most level-headed posters here.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,151
    Dynamo said:

    The king won't last long. Harry isn't stupid and he has a backbone. He has matured amazingly since his Nazi uniform idiocy, the Las Vegas business, and Afghanistan. His spoilt toe-rag of a father will never mature.

    What if...just imagine...Harry were to have written a few alternative versions of one of the chapters in his book...and he chooses the one that really gives his father the almighty kick in the b*llocks he deserves and he leaks a copy later this week? Bye-bye kingy. Bye-bye monarchy. Go for it, Harry.

    All the build-up is in one direction. All the other side have got is to print articles saying trillions of admirers are flocking the streets, blah blah. They've got absolutely nothing else - oh, some stuff about the late queen. WTF has she got to do with anything?
    If Harry did that most of the population would take the King's side and boo Harry if he ever set foot in this country again.

    He would reveal himself as nothing but the petulant, rude, ungrateful, spoilt brat he is who abandoned his royal duties to run off to California with Meghan to make money off his royal fame. Hopefully after this week he will show a bit more maturity!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,151

    Boris Johnson was never the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

    It is odd which bits of religious doctrines christians choose to ignore, adultery, yeah ok, homosexuality, lowest of the low.
    Not true, the Roman Catholic Church never gave Henry a divorce for example and still opposes divorce
  • This thread is now lying in state.

  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 9,135
    Carnyx said:

    How many times does it go round, or zigzag, in the Meadows? ANd does it go into Bruntsfield Links?
    It's a very slow sightseeing tour. Any enterprising locals selling tickets at the end of the queue?
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 9,135

    Very heavy shelling tonight… in Warminster! We are just on the edge of Salisbury plain, and the recent rain means the army can get their big guns out again. Wonder if it’s Ukrainian troops out training?

    Sounds like their aim is a little off if the shelling is actually in Warminster? :open_mouth:
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited September 2022
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/12/anti-monarchy-protester-charged-with-a-breach-of-the-peace-edinburgh-queen-death-king

    “A period of quiet mourning for the Queen is fine, but using that period to cement Charles’ accession as King and cracking down on any dissent to the accession as disrespectful is outrageous.”

    Couldn’t agree more.

    This stinks.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 33,886
    ping said:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/12/anti-monarchy-protester-charged-with-a-breach-of-the-peace-edinburgh-queen-death-king

    “A period of quiet mourning for the Queen is fine, but using that period to cement Charles’ accession as King and cracking down on any dissent to the accession as disrespectful is outrageous.”

    Couldn’t agree more.

    This stinks.

    +1
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 10,407
    kle4 said:

    It's ok to be a bit unusual.
    No its not, its a man in need of therapy he should go see one pronto. What he describes is not a sane response to the passing of a woman he has never met and had no ties with
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,995
    Pagan2 said:

    No its not, its a man in need of therapy he should go see one pronto. What he describes is not a sane response to the passing of a woman he has never met and had no ties with
    Never seen people get upset at the death of a celebrity before then?
  • kle4 said:

    Never seen people get upset at the death of a celebrity before then?
    Upset, sure.
    Angry and abusive? Not really.
This discussion has been closed.