Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

What do the “Turnip Taliban” think of their MP now? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 11,716
edited July 2022 in General
imageWhat do the “Turnip Taliban” think of their MP now? – politicalbetting.com

The hot betting favourite for the next PM, Liz Truss, first had a PB thread about her in 2009 before she even became an MP.

Read the full story here

«134

Comments

  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,465
    First
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,465
    edited July 2022
    And on topic they will love her now. She is the out there non-Rishi candidate. What's not to like.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,039
    edited July 2022
    Third.
    What are the tabloids referred to as now?
  • Options
    FairlieredFairliered Posts: 4,036
    edited July 2022
    Looks like her constituency association were 13 years ahead of the rest of us in not rating her.
    Edit - fourth. If Aberdeen can achieve those dizzy heights this season I’ll be amazed!
    Further edit. Some people obviously seem to rate her. No accounting for taste.
  • Options
    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.
  • Options
    Whatever happened to @bunnco our man on the spot?

    Great to see Truss doing well, she deserves it.

    Also amusing that we have some of our own Turnip Taliban like @Nigel_Foremain that still can't stand her.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    I love the way that that picture of the sign for Swaffham Conservative Club suggests it is some dodgy joint where the girls hanging around the bar aren't there because they like the decor.
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    TOPPING said:

    And on topic they will love her now. She is the out there non-Rishi candidate. What's not to like.

    Quite a lot

    On the + side she will be my first 100/1 shot to come in
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,690
    News flash - King County Elections reports that it has received my returned ballot for August 2, 2022 primary, that my signature has been verified and ballot accepted for tabulation.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 27,058
    edited July 2022
    What happened to the PB2 channel?

    If you want to read the comments on the 2009 thread they're available here:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20091110153842/https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/11/03/will-dave-prevail-against-the-norfolk-nineteen/
  • Options
    nico679nico679 Posts: 5,081

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    She folded like a cheap suit to get some trade deals which screwed UK farmers , failed to defend judges against disgraceful attacks from the right wing press and is now going to embark on forcing through a bill which breaks international law .

    Objectively she’s done bugger all in terms of positive achievements but in this alternate university which the Tories live in she’s a marvelous candidate for PM .
  • Options
    Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,401

    Whatever happened to @bunnco our man on the spot?

    Great to see Truss doing well, she deserves it.

    Also amusing that we have some of our own Turnip Taliban like @Nigel_Foremain that still can't stand her.

    I think Barty loves Lizzy....

    :wink:
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,882
    Dominic Cummings “reports” that Liz Truss’s campaign is being run be arch-arch-arch remainer Roland Rudd.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,407
    Sounds like PB inc is calling this 1/2 shot home and hosed?
  • Options
    Barty was doing so well for a few months but he’s regressed I’m afraid.

    This is Johnson all over again
  • Options
    Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 7,981

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    It will be mandatory health insurance next. All those US companies wanting in to UK healthcare...
  • Options
    DriverDriver Posts: 4,522
    SA batting like England so far.
  • Options
    Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,401
    We have an unholy triumvirate in government at the moment, the clown, fishy and cheesy

    :smiley:
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    kinabalu said:

    Sounds like PB inc is calling this 1/2 shot home and hosed?

    Well honestly Rishi is such a dork, what was he thinking not lending votes to Penny?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,901
    edited July 2022

    Whatever happened to @bunnco our man on the spot?

    Great to see Truss doing well, she deserves it.

    Also amusing that we have some of our own Turnip Taliban like @Nigel_Foremain that still can't stand her.

    I think Barty loves Lizzy....

    :wink:
    Someone has to...
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,643
    Betfair next prime minister
    1.43 Liz Truss 70%
    3.35 Rishi Sunak 30%

    Next Conservative leader
    1.43 Liz Truss 70%
    3.3 Rishi Sunak 30%
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,528

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
  • Options
    EPGEPG Posts: 6,079

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Not a lot. What has Sunak achieved. He has spent tens of billions more than he taxed. He stopped for about 20 seconds and the papers screamed that he was a millionaire with a green card and a billionaire non-dom wife. Then he started again and everyone loved him. Then the good people decided that he was the candidate to bring back morality to the Tories, because he opposed Johnson for, again, about 20 seconds.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,706
    edited July 2022

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    Found this




  • Options
    DriverDriver Posts: 4,522

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    It's a good question, but there must be something there because you don't get to be in the Cabinet under three so very different PMs unless there's something there.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,560
    Driver said:

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    It's a good question, but there must be something there because you don't get to be in the Cabinet under three so very different PMs unless there's something there.
    Loyalty, flexibility, and lack of principles?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,901

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,643
    Andy_JS said:

    What happened to the PB2 channel?

    If you want to read the comments on the 2009 thread they're available here:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20091110153842/https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/11/03/will-dave-prevail-against-the-norfolk-nineteen/

    Fascinating to see the comments about David Cameron weaselling out of his referendum pledge — on Lisbon!
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,882

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
    According to her critics she has generally been kept away from policy-heavy roles since that stint in Education.

    Hence, Lord Chancellor, Trade, Foreign Office.
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,690

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
    #2 explains the buzzzzzz re: Lizzzzz. Queen Bee of HMG.
  • Options
    boulayboulay Posts: 4,040
    IanB2 said:

    Driver said:

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    It's a good question, but there must be something there because you don't get to be in the Cabinet under three so very different PMs unless there's something there.
    Loyalty, flexibility, and lack of principles?
    Sounds like the woman I want!
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,882
    Foxy said:

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

    Yes I don’t believe it’s ill health.
    It’s people taking the opportunity to avoid working and enjoy parenthood or retirement - and who is to say they are wrong?

    Inflation may encourage them back, though.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822
    Foxy said:

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

    There's an archived version of the article here:
    https://archive.ph/vTxhu

    I'm not convinced it justifies the claim made, but I'd be interested in others' views.

  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    Foxy said:

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

    Yes, I think this is an early retirement thing to be honest. And the graphs are a bit fuzzy in the sense that say in US 26% of workforce are inactive but the graph is falling post covid whereas we are only 21 but rising. And France is 27 (home of early retirement). But at first glance our graph looks shit.

    Is this a baby boomer thing? I am of an age where every conversation with a get-together of my fellow 55+ mates and old colleagues turns to the topic of early retirement.

  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,882
    When you are sitting on significant property wealth, perhaps even including a buy-to-let or two, why the fuck would you work unless it’s genuinely engaging?
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,407

    Whatever happened to @bunnco our man on the spot?

    Great to see Truss doing well, she deserves it.

    Also amusing that we have some of our own Turnip Taliban like @Nigel_Foremain that still can't stand her.

    I think Barty loves Lizzy....

    :wink:
    Well the best way to get over a crush is to succumb to the next one asap.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
    Sounds like she will win on a landslide then.
  • Options
    novanova Posts: 525
    edited July 2022

    Foxy said:

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

    Yes, I think this is an early retirement thing to be honest. And the graphs are a bit fuzzy in the sense that say in US 26% of workforce are inactive but the graph is falling post covid whereas we are only 21 but rising. And France is 27 (home of early retirement). But at first glance our graph looks shit.

    Is this a baby boomer thing? I am of an age where every conversation with a get-together of my fellow 55+ mates and old colleagues turns to the topic of early retirement.

    Doesn't the graph of the comparison with Spain show that it's mostly long term sick, with a smaller number of retirees?

    The long-term sickness figure is 309,000, while retirees looks to be around 100,000.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,302
    edited July 2022
    Barcelona subscribes to the Liz Truss branch of economics....

    Overnight Barcelona have sold 15% of their TV rights for the next 25 years, receiving €315million. They'd already sold 10% a few weeks ago for €207million. So yeah, they've got a bit of cash...

    So pay down their 1bn in debt, nah, spend it all on a load of player in their 30s with zero resale value.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,643

    Foxy said:

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

    Yes, I think this is an early retirement thing to be honest. And the graphs are a bit fuzzy in the sense that say in US 26% of workforce are inactive but the graph is falling post covid whereas we are only 21 but rising. And France is 27 (home of early retirement). But at first glance our graph looks shit.

    Is this a baby boomer thing? I am of an age where every conversation with a get-together of my fellow 55+ mates and old colleagues turns to the topic of early retirement.

    I am sort of retired after being made redundant during the pandemic. I don't know but suspect a lot of it is older people finding it harder to get new jobs. We are less strong and fit for manual work; not thought up to date with the latest tech fads.
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    Bannon GUILTY :):)
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    Just topped up a nibble on Sunak at those prices.

  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487

    Dominic Cummings “reports” that Liz Truss’s campaign is being run be arch-arch-arch remainer Roland Rudd.

    The name is familiar... I can't quite place it though.
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,882
    edited July 2022

    Dominic Cummings “reports” that Liz Truss’s campaign is being run be arch-arch-arch remainer Roland Rudd.

    The name is familiar... I can't quite place it though.
    PR veteran, ballser-up of the Second Ref campaign, brother of Amber.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,210

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,643

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,901

    When you are sitting on significant property wealth, perhaps even including a buy-to-let or two, why the fuck would you work unless it’s genuinely engaging?

    I am not the only one of my colleagues noticing that if I stay working I get 4.5% pay rise, if I retire I get 9.4% (CPI). Keeping working makes no financial sense, indeed I may well shortly retire and return part time after the required 28 day gap.
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,882

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,302
    edited July 2022

    Dominic Cummings “reports” that Liz Truss’s campaign is being run be arch-arch-arch remainer Roland Rudd.

    The name is familiar... I can't quite place it though.
    PR veteran, ballser-up of the Second Ref campaign, brother of Amber.
    Isn't he also a well known Labour supporter / member. Seems unlikely he would run a Tory campaign.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,039
    alex_ said:

    Bannon GUILTY :):)

    What sentence could he get?
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Reality check: it would have to be something so discreditable and disgusting that it put off significant numbers of we-want-Boris-backers. I can't imagine what that would look like, casn you?
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822
    Foxy said:

    FPT:

    Have we done this one earlier? It is potentially explosive surely? Or coloration is not causation?


    "With direct impacts of Covid ruled out, the most plausible remaining explanation is grim: we may be witnessing the collapse of the NHS, as hundreds of thousands of patients, unable to access timely care, see their condition worsen to the point of being unable to work. The 332,000 people who have been waiting more than a year for hospital treatment in Britain is a close numerical match for the 309,000 now missing from the labour force due to long-term sickness."

    Chronic illness makes UK workforce the sickest in developed world
    https://www.ft.com/content/c333a6d8-0a56-488c-aeb8-eeb1c05a34d2?sharetype=blocked

    How many of the 332 000 long waiters are of working age is the key missing stat there. I suspect fewer than half, but it is a guess.

    The two big missing groups of workers post lockdown are over fifties males (mostly early retirements?) and thirty something women (perhaps enjoying time at home with the families?).

    The FT claim their analysis is ages 15-64.

    (Which of course means that students are within their age group.

    The number of HE students in the UK increased from 2.41 million to 2.66 million between 2019/20 and 2021/22, with approx 80% being full time.
    )

    His analysis needs a lot of unpacking.

    https://archive.ph/vTxhu
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    I think one of our august gang posted yesterday that some obscure rule means that members can vote and then change their minds and then vote again and again and it will be the final vote that counts.

    Sounds bonkers, so given we are in 2020s it is probably true.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,643

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
    Sounds like she will win on a landslide then.
    Liz Truss's trade deals might not be as favourable as we might have hoped but they probably mean she has done more to shore up the post-Brexit settlement than any other minister.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,302
    SA 27-5

    Good job England, I mean SA, bat deep....
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 28,039

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    I think one of our august gang posted yesterday that some obscure rule means that members can vote and then change their minds and then vote again and again and it will be the final vote that counts.

    Sounds bonkers, so given we are in 2020s it is probably true.
    Not again and again. They can vote both by post and Online.
    But I do think they can do so repeatedly.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    "Robert Hayward, a Tory peer and elections expert...

    “not convinced” the result was a foregone conclusion."

    I'm nibbling at 3.35 and I will go more if Sunak hits 4.
  • Options
    DriverDriver Posts: 4,522

    SA 27-5

    Good job England, I mean SA, bat deep....

    Starting to rain, still 10 overs short of an official game.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    dixiedean said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    I think one of our august gang posted yesterday that some obscure rule means that members can vote and then change their minds and then vote again and again and it will be the final vote that counts.

    Sounds bonkers, so given we are in 2020s it is probably true.
    Not again and again. They can vote both by post and Online.
    But I do think they can do so repeatedly.
    They can't do so repeatedly??
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,528

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
    This progress report from FoE is a bit mixed on the pollinator strategy, but it sounds like they don't regard it as a complete failure, which is relatively high praise.

    https://policy.friendsoftheearth.uk/opinion/bee-cause-are-britains-bees-and-pollinators-back-brink
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,407

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    IshmaelZ said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Reality check: it would have to be something so discreditable and disgusting that it put off significant numbers of we-want-Boris-backers. I can't imagine what that would look like, casn you?
    I'm not prepared to speculate on the nature of the skeleton.

  • Options
    boulayboulay Posts: 4,040

    Dominic Cummings “reports” that Liz Truss’s campaign is being run be arch-arch-arch remainer Roland Rudd.

    The name is familiar... I can't quite place it though.
    He used to be the star of Saturday morning children's’ tv with Philip Schofield and Kevin the Gerbil. I think.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822
    dixiedean said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    I think one of our august gang posted yesterday that some obscure rule means that members can vote and then change their minds and then vote again and again and it will be the final vote that counts.

    Sounds bonkers, so given we are in 2020s it is probably true.
    Not again and again. They can vote both by post and Online.
    But I do think they can do so repeatedly.
    If they revote, only the last one counts.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487

    Jason Groves
    @JasonGroves1
    Environment minister Zac Goldsmith says Extinction Rebellion & co are right to cause mayhem. Tells the BBC's Week in Westminster that 'we're not doing enough' to tackle climate change, adding: 'That kind of pressure does work, it may be annoying but it works.'
  • Options
    alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    dixiedean said:

    alex_ said:

    Bannon GUILTY :):)

    What sentence could he get?
    Up to 1 yr and 100k per count (guilty on both - two - counts). Sentencing not til late October so hopefully he does a lot to encourage the worse by then…
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,901

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    Her Wikipedia page is quite detailed. I'd put the highlights of her ministerial career as being:

    1. Numerous trade deals when International Trade Secretary.
    2. As Secretary of State for the Environment she launched a 10-year bee and pollinator strategy in November 2014. After a quick look I haven't yet been able to find information on whether that has been a success, but there should be some about somewhere. I'll keep looking.
    3. She was named Road Safety Parliamentarian of the month while a backbencher for her campaigning to improve road design in her constituency.

    Everything else mentioned is either incomplete, or subjective, or part of the normal irrelevant treadmill of politics. Not sure how that compares to other politicians. I wasn't expecting to find much.
    Sounds like she will win on a landslide then.
    Liz Truss's trade deals might not be as favourable as we might have hoped but they probably mean she has done more to shore up the post-Brexit settlement than any other minister.
    The Australian one that went through without Parliamentary scrutiny was a good shifter of votes to the LDs in Honiton and Tiverton by all accounts. That Turnip Taliban might get restive. Indeed agricultural support could be a good card for Rishi to play.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,643
    edited July 2022
    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822


    Jason Groves
    @JasonGroves1
    Environment minister Zac Goldsmith says Extinction Rebellion & co are right to cause mayhem. Tells the BBC's Week in Westminster that 'we're not doing enough' to tackle climate change, adding: 'That kind of pressure does work, it may be annoying but it works.'

    What an idiot.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487
    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    The first rule of Finland is that we are not allowed to talk about it. :smile:
  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 7,371
    dixiedean said:

    alex_ said:

    Bannon GUILTY :):)

    What sentence could he get?
    30 days to a year for each of the 2 charges
  • Options
    nico679nico679 Posts: 5,081


    Jason Groves
    @JasonGroves1
    Environment minister Zac Goldsmith says Extinction Rebellion & co are right to cause mayhem. Tells the BBC's Week in Westminster that 'we're not doing enough' to tackle climate change, adding: 'That kind of pressure does work, it may be annoying but it works.'

    Can you imagine what would happen if it was a Labour minister supporting it .
  • Options
    FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,064
    Watching Dateline London - the American journalist suggested perhaps unsurprisingly that people in the US weren't really tuned into the race to be the next Prime minister whereas the Indian guest said that people in his country were fascinated by it. In part because they saw Sunak leading among MPs and assumed that he had it in the bag not realising that there was a two stage process.

    Whatever you think of his policies having a prime minister who captivates the people of the world's most populous country is unlikely to be bad for us.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,487

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
    Moomintroll knows the truth.

  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,821

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    If there's any good evidence that Truss is a nutter then right now would be a good time to share it.

    I think she is a bit mad, and that's why I'll not vote for her. However what she's saying about economic policy is quite right, although I don't think she's done her homework.

    Sunak is very dull and also somehow delivers dullness in a bad way. A 6% rise in corporate taxation is just nuts. It really isn't hard to ring-fence the cvoid spend. Fewer rules would be a good thing. How hard can it be?

    Truss seems to be quite awful in her current role too. Whatever the rights and wrongs of this we need a person that will be taken seriously world-wide, and that's going to be a man, or a far better woman.

  • Options
    wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 7,371
    Norfolk SW is currently the 11th safest Tory seat so a good chance if she wins and with 'leader bonus' of it being one of the very safest seats in the country
  • Options
    Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 7,981

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    The first rule of Finland is that we are not allowed to talk about it. :smile:
    The Swan of Tuonela was written by a Finnish composer. I cannot recall if the swan was black or if it was the lake it swam on ... :open_mouth:
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,528

    Watching Dateline London - the American journalist suggested perhaps unsurprisingly that people in the US weren't really tuned into the race to be the next Prime minister whereas the Indian guest said that people in his country were fascinated by it. In part because they saw Sunak leading among MPs and assumed that he had it in the bag not realising that there was a two stage process.

    Whatever you think of his policies having a prime minister who captivates the people of the world's most populous country is unlikely to be bad for us.

    Might be a bit of a blow to relations if he loses the next GE by a landslide though.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822
    nico679 said:


    Jason Groves
    @JasonGroves1
    Environment minister Zac Goldsmith says Extinction Rebellion & co are right to cause mayhem. Tells the BBC's Week in Westminster that 'we're not doing enough' to tackle climate change, adding: 'That kind of pressure does work, it may be annoying but it works.'

    Can you imagine what would happen if it was a Labour minister supporting it .
    Jamie Reed got into trouble for going against them.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/17/labour-split-by-leadership-call-for-action-against-climate-crisis-blockades

    Whilst for Goldsmith, it's an old position, for which he got roasted.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/12/tory-mps-criticise-ben-goldsmith-extinction-rebellion-just-stop-oil

    Probably blurred boundaries, of course.
  • Options
    EPGEPG Posts: 6,079

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
    Moomintroll knows the truth.

    I've been leafing through my Ikea catalogues to find out, no joy.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822
    Whilst we are mentioning stupid protestors, are the new 'interference with infrastructure' laws yet in force so that we might see some of the "Just Stop Oil" goons behind bars?
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,882
    edited July 2022
    Omnium said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    If there's any good evidence that Truss is a nutter then right now would be a good time to share it.

    I think she is a bit mad, and that's why I'll not vote for her. However what she's saying about economic policy is quite right, although I don't think she's done her homework.

    Sunak is very dull and also somehow delivers dullness in a bad way. A 6% rise in corporate taxation is just nuts. It really isn't hard to ring-fence the cvoid spend. Fewer rules would be a good thing. How hard can it be?

    Truss seems to be quite awful in her current role too. Whatever the rights and wrongs of this we need a person that will be taken seriously world-wide, and that's going to be a man, or a far better woman.

    I still can't shake Queenie from my mind every time I think of Truss.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNgUAtIQjPM
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    MattW said:

    Whilst we are mentioning stupid protestors, are the new 'interference with infrastructure' laws yet in force so that we might see some of the "Just Stop Oil" goons behind bars?

    Their signal is a bit obscured by the fact that Petrol Should Be Much Cheaper are doing exactly what they are doing
  • Options
    IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    EPG said:

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
    Moomintroll knows the truth.

    I've been leafing through my Ikea catalogues to find out, no joy.
    Ikea's Swedish. Check the firmware in your Nokia phone.
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,821

    Omnium said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    If there's any good evidence that Truss is a nutter then right now would be a good time to share it.

    I think she is a bit mad, and that's why I'll not vote for her. However what she's saying about economic policy is quite right, although I don't think she's done her homework.

    Sunak is very dull and also somehow delivers dullness in a bad way. A 6% rise in corporate taxation is just nuts. It really isn't hard to ring-fence the cvoid spend. Fewer rules would be a good thing. How hard can it be?

    Truss seems to be quite awful in her current role too. Whatever the rights and wrongs of this we need a person that will be taken seriously world-wide, and that's going to be a man, or a far better woman.

    I still can't shake Queenie from my mind every time I think of Truss.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNgUAtIQjPM
    I'd settle for Queenie mad.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,882
    MattW said:

    dixiedean said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    I think one of our august gang posted yesterday that some obscure rule means that members can vote and then change their minds and then vote again and again and it will be the final vote that counts.

    Sounds bonkers, so given we are in 2020s it is probably true.
    Not again and again. They can vote both by post and Online.
    But I do think they can do so repeatedly.
    If they revote, only the last one counts.

    Assuming he's behind into mid-August, I am sure Sunak will be reminding the membership about this facility after any Truss gaffes.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,822
    MattW said:

    nico679 said:


    Jason Groves
    @JasonGroves1
    Environment minister Zac Goldsmith says Extinction Rebellion & co are right to cause mayhem. Tells the BBC's Week in Westminster that 'we're not doing enough' to tackle climate change, adding: 'That kind of pressure does work, it may be annoying but it works.'

    Can you imagine what would happen if it was a Labour minister supporting it .
    Jamie Reed got into trouble for going against them.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/17/labour-split-by-leadership-call-for-action-against-climate-crisis-blockades

    Whilst for Goldsmith, it's an old position, for which he got roasted.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/12/tory-mps-criticise-ben-goldsmith-extinction-rebellion-just-stop-oil

    Probably blurred boundaries, of course.
    Correction: Last quote inaccurate - got my Goldsmith brothers mixed up.
  • Options
    FairlieredFairliered Posts: 4,036

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
    Is it something that could finnish the government?
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,882
    edited July 2022

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    The first rule of Finland is that we are not allowed to talk about it. :smile:
    The Swan of Tuonela was written by a Finnish composer. I cannot recall if the swan was black or if it was the lake it swam on ... :open_mouth:
    Not just 'a' Finnish composer, the great Finnish composer Jean Sibelius.
  • Options
    TresTres Posts: 2,260

    What has Liz Truss achieved. Objectively.

    First Liberal to be Foreign Secretary since Selwyn-Lloyd and the night of the long knives.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,882

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
    Is it something that could finnish the government?
    Nice.

    Although I think this government is already effectively finished tbh.
  • Options
    Sorry Finnish, I’m lost
  • Options
    algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 10,642

    MattW said:

    dixiedean said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    So he is hoping people don’t vote early.
    And that anyone will pay attention to the hustings.
    I think one of our august gang posted yesterday that some obscure rule means that members can vote and then change their minds and then vote again and again and it will be the final vote that counts.

    Sounds bonkers, so given we are in 2020s it is probably true.
    Not again and again. They can vote both by post and Online.
    But I do think they can do so repeatedly.
    If they revote, only the last one counts.

    Assuming he's behind into mid-August, I am sure Sunak will be reminding the membership about this facility after any Truss gaffes.
    It's always a mistake to complicate a simple system. 'Vote at time X by mechanism Y for just one of two candidates' is nice and simple. Even Tory members would be able to understand it.
  • Options
    FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,064

    Dominic Cummings “reports” that Liz Truss’s campaign is being run be arch-arch-arch remainer Roland Rudd.

    I'd be amazed if that is true. But what amazes us anymore? I seem to remember a very catty piece by someone (Alistair Campbell?) about his involvement with the second referendum campaign. A vanity project for promoting the name of Roland Rudd.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,901
    edited July 2022
    Omnium said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    Sources supporting Sunak said that while party members would be able to vote from 1 August, they would be urged not to write him off until later in the contest.

    “We all think she [Truss] is going to be so bad at the hustings that members will change their minds,” one said. Another predicted: “He will shine at the hustings, whereas Truss is mental and will be found out.”


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/22/rishi-sunak-camp-says-debates-against-truss-will-change-tory-members-minds
    If there's any good evidence that Truss is a nutter then right now would be a good time to share it.

    I think she is a bit mad, and that's why I'll not vote for her. However what she's saying about economic policy is quite right, although I don't think she's done her homework.

    Sunak is very dull and also somehow delivers dullness in a bad way. A 6% rise in corporate taxation is just nuts. It really isn't hard to ring-fence the cvoid spend. Fewer rules would be a good thing. How hard can it be?

    Truss seems to be quite awful in her current role too. Whatever the rights and wrongs of this we need a person that will be taken seriously world-wide, and that's going to be a man, or a far better woman.

    The rise in company tax is only for companies reporting more than £50 000 in profit, and only the full 25% at £250 000 profit, accompanied with very generous allowances for capital investment and a taper inbetween.

    Clever companies will understand the incentive to invest in capital equipment, training and recruitment. SME companies will largely be unaffected. Indeed it is quite carefully structured to address Britain's longstanding problem of poor productivity growth.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,901

    kinabalu said:

    Andy_JS said:
    Sunak is definite value there imho because it always possible that a black swan bearing some massive skeleton comes winging across the sunday paper skies.

    It is possible but unlikely, pace Finland, that there is much new mud to be thrown after the MPs' round. There will be a televised head-to-head debate on Monday, and that might crown or dethrone one or other.
    What is this 'Finland' please?
    It is said there is an explosive scandal that will undermine the British government and civilisation as we know it, protected by superinjunctions, and known only to those who read Finnish social media.
    Is it something that could finnish the government?
    The heat on them will be like a sauna.
This discussion has been closed.