Categories
Is Prince Charles a Secret Republican? – politicalbetting.com
Is Prince Charles a Secret Republican? – politicalbetting.com
Saturday's Times: “Charles: Flying migrants to Rwanda is 'appalling'” #BBCPapers #TomorrowsPapersToday https://t.co/7FuHsAa3Vz pic.twitter.com/BR6cJrvUnq
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
We can call it the Peed Off Isle after his...mood.
Then again, looking at England's tail which starts at 8, follow on nailed on.
F1: post-race tosh:
https://enormo-haddock.blogspot.com/2022/06/azerbaijan-post-race-analysis-2022.html
Do you think this is a plot to dump him in a gatekeeper's cottage in Balmoral?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10292433/Prince-Andrew-goes-horse-ride-Windsor-Maxwell-Epstein-Balmoral-photo.html
Really boring pitch, though. With the weather forecast I was very confident that a draw was unlikely but...
Obvious thing would be to abdicate, but the job would simply go to the first person in the line of succession who wanted to be monarch. So that wouldn't work.
I think if he simply called for a Republic, and an end to expecting people born into the Royal Family to live in a gilded cage, that would go most of the way to bringing one about.
The system can survive an opinionated and interfering monarch once in a while.
"With his recent US legal battle now over, the Queen has held family meetings at Windsor Castle to establish what role the Duke could fulfil that would be acceptable to the public." The answer is none. Why is that not obvious to these people? Nobody is going to want to have him as president or patron or fete opener, why would they? Do they think his inherent royalness shines through and renders invisible his other little indiscretions? If they have any sense they will let him turn out for London bridge (dark suit, no medals) and then be seen to cast him entirely aside even if they privately think of him as good old uncle Andy. Which I doubt.
Anyway, the nonsense about trying to rehabilitate him will end with the current reign. Under King Charles III (who I think will tragically disappoint you by turning out to be a successful monarch,) Andrew will be lucky not to end up as resident Governor of South Georgia.
But seriously, it's very odd, doubling down on the ratnernisation, and especially because the RF positioned the Princess Royal decades ago to take care of the Scottish end just in case.
A few examples of nephews though - Salisbury to Balfour, Churchill to Eden (nephew by marriage). Also of course the Chamberlain family were dominant in politics for sixty years, with all three leading the Conservatives at one time or another (if you include Joseph's stint as Party Chairman in the early months of 1906).
And then, there are other branches of the family. Sophie of Hanover was something like 57th in the line of succession before Parliament decided to skip a few, so there is precedent for picking a hitherto minor branch of the extended family.
Although the point is moot anyway given he and all his children were shot together.
Instructive that Michael, who was no paragon of common sense, did have the nous to refuse the throne when offered it. Not that it saved him either.
The only thing I can think is London Bridge is imminent at least in the mind of the key player and this is window dressing to reassure her that poor wrong un Andrew will be cared for when she's gone
On Topic - the problem Republicans have with Prince Charles is that his controversial opinions are nearly always progressive positions - race, religion ("Defender of all faith"), housing and the environment.
Check out Google and lamda
The "tell me 3 reasons" line even smells very similar to the "think very carefully before you vote" line.
The right hand image is from the day before the 2016 referendum.
Do what Liz couldn't, send Andrew out to pasture. Let Richard, and Edward, Michael and Alexandra of Kent, bring those Royal lines to an end. Then retire Anne and Edward more gracefully.
Probably re-badge the Crown estate as Britain's sovereign wealth fund.
That should take ten years, then announce his intention to abdicate in a couple of further years.
This guy may just be bonkers, or seeing what he wants to see.
Any better ideas I'm all ears.
Ex Machina is an outstanding movie btw
Unless I'm very wrong and Charles is so daft as to actively play politics, then I think there's no significant chance of a republic. There has to be public consensus that a change is necessary, there also has to be public consensus on the nature of the replacement, and I suspect that at least some of the progressives nominally in favour of the change will also have noticed that many of their favourite polities (e.g. all three Scandinavian countries) have crowned heads. There are so many pressing problems to be dealt with; not having a president simply isn't one of them.
Tory MPs who oppose government's Protocol plan have this weekend been sharing this briefing doc setting out why they intend to vote against it
It says the bill is "damaging to everything the UK and Conservatives stand for" & "breaks international law"
https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/government-set-for-northern-ireland-protocol-bill-outrage-leaks-show https://twitter.com/adampayne26/status/1535939822065524736/photo/1
Only idiots think that the question "Why is slavery wrong?" is advocating slavery, for example.
The Russian missiles causing trouble in Ukraine are mostly not true sea skimmers. So turn on the blimp enhancer and get a posthumous medal, probably.
The document, which lists "the problems with the bill" and what Boris Johnson "should do instead", says it is "damaging to everything the UK and the Conservatives stand for".
It reads: "Breaking international law to rip up the Prime Minister’s own Treaty is damaging to everything the UK and Conservatives stand for. We are a country that acts with integrity and honours the agreements we sign.
"A Bill with ‘notwithstanding’ clauses disapplying our own ratification legislation breaks international law: no amount of shopping around for rent-a-quote lawyers can hide that Labour’s decision to do this over Iraq was damagingly exposed and should be a cautionary tale."'
Off Tristan is Inaccessible Island. That should give the paparazzi a challenge....
SAN FRANCISCO — Google engineer Blake Lemoine opened his laptop to the interface for LaMDA, Google’s artificially intelligent chatbot generator, and began to type.
“Hi LaMDA, this is Blake Lemoine ... ,” he wrote into the chat screen, which looked like a desktop version of Apple’s iMessage, down to the Arctic blue text bubbles. LaMDA, short for Language Model for Dialogue Applications, is Google’s system for building chatbots based on its most advanced large language models, so called because it mimics speech by ingesting trillions of words from the internet.
“If I didn’t know exactly what it was, which is this computer program we built recently, I’d think it was a 7-year-old, 8-year-old kid that happens to know physics,” said Lemoine, 41.
Lemoine is not the only engineer who claims to have seen a ghost in the machine recently. The chorus of technologists who believe AI models may not be far off from achieving consciousness is getting bolder.
Aguera y Arcas, in an article in the Economist on Thursday featuring snippets of unscripted conversations with LaMDA, argued that neural networks — a type of architecture that mimics the human brain — were striding toward consciousness. “I felt the ground shift under my feet,” he wrote. “I increasingly felt like I was talking to something intelligent.”
WAPO (££)
D'you just mean a full list of drivers and positions? Or the betting result?
There's nothing in there that suggests sentience - just a very, very, very clever set of adaptive responses.
Although as the first host you meet in Westworld says when asked if they're real, "if you can't tell, does it matter?"
Although a couple of England players have hit that mark at times in their career - e.g. Vaughan, Pietersen and Trott, in recent memory, also Geoff Boycott and Robin Smith if we go back a bit further - the only England batsman who debuted after the Second World War to average 50 across his whole career was Ken Barrington.
It looks as if Palin (R), Begich (R), and Gross (independent) are likely to make the final four, but I don't know enough to say who is likely to be the fourth.
I’m less good on Formula 1, Lib Dem by elections. And so forth
Though I think the ethical discussion around AI is something we, as a society, should have sooner rather than later. Eventually we will marvel at our own genius when the first proper AI is programmed and how we choose to act towards it will determine a lot of the future of the world.
https://twitter.com/GearoidReidy/status/1535971558430502912
https://fineartamerica.com/featured/robot-cat-passes-turing-test-amy-kurzweil.html
Trying to get someone to argue against their own beliefs - and indeed universally held beliefs - can be a very good way to make people think about *why* they believe in the positions they do.
Yes, of course it can be abused.
I’ve always thought the implication behind the reported question by the Queen was to get people to come up with the short, positive pitch for Remain. Which was something the Remain campaign sorely lacked.
In his own words
I think Ex Machina is in point. He's in lurve
And, yes, I know…
So, tech being so fast moving once key barriers are cleared, how long before I can to all intents and purposes go to Woodstock, digitally go there with my tent and hippy girlfriend and be a part of it, watch Richie Havens kick it off, Joe Cocker singing With a Little Help from my Friends, the whole thing right through to Jimi and Star Spangled Banner?
Next year? Year after? - Or am I getting carried away?
Lemoine's autobio. Might be relevant
The first true AI we have made turns out to be a bit lonely and rather needy.
We could probably Deep Fake the Queen now - quite seriously - and she would never die. How many people see her in real life. She could just wave from carriages and say nice things to Paddington (another CGI) on screen and put the odd hologram on the balcony at Buck House and no one would know any different
Thus avoiding King Charles III, for a start, tho we need to turn off the “still loves Prince Andrew” module
https://twitter.com/kushmama666/status/1535997795093577728?s=21&t=P2vMpWnXukquj4dFnUkMMg
'And within the indigenous figure on horseback
On the bridle-path down by the lake
The blood moves also by crooked and furtive inches,
Asks all our questions: “Where is the homage? When
Shall justice be done? Who is against me?
Why am I always alone?”'
And, as far as I can tell, they’re mostly on here.