17 months. That’s all it took, though to judge by the outraged comments from Ministers it may as well have been 17 centuries ago, so short are their memories. What happened 17 months ago that could possibly have any relevance today?
Beyond the issue of a Minister of Crown green-lighting violations of law - international or otherwise - on grounds of "necessity, my question is this:
Can CEO of P&O be judged in contempt of the House of Commons? And Lords?
Ain't got a vote, but sure seems that way to me.
Just a day or so, to make the point that such pirates can NOT come before a parliamentary committee then brag about breaking the law and their determination to do it again if (they think it) need be.
EDIT - BTW, do we know approximate size & remuneration of P&O "payroll vote" in Parliament? Am assuming it is greater than zero both ways.
Beyond the issue of a Minister of Crown green-lighting violations of law - international or otherwise - on grounds of "necessity, my question is this:
Can CEO of P&O be judged in contempt of the House of Commons? And Lords?
Ain't got a vote, but sure seems that way to me.
Just a day or so, to make the point that such pirates can NOT come before a parliamentary committee then brag about breaking the law and their determination to do it again if (they think it) need be.
I just cannot understand what he was thinking. Did he really assume that he would be able to say, 'yes we know the law, but it didn't suit us so we ignored it?' and that MPs would accept that?
This isn't a fecking speeding offence. Either the law applies, or it doesn't. If it does, he's just left his company with no defence at all when he is sued. If it doesn't, then in saying it does he's clearly so stupid he shouldn't even be running the DfE never mind a private company.
Utter madness. This is a company that whatever its financial state is clearly in the last throes of collapse.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Beyond the issue of a Minister of Crown green-lighting violations of law - international or otherwise - on grounds of "necessity, my question is this:
Can CEO of P&O be judged in contempt of the House of Commons? And Lords?
Ain't got a vote, but sure seems that way to me.
Just a day or so, to make the point that such pirates can NOT come before a parliamentary committee then brag about breaking the law and their determination to do it again if (they think it) need be.
I just cannot understand what he was thinking. Did he really assume that he would be able to say, 'yes we know the law, but it didn't suit us so we ignored it?' and that MPs would accept that?
This isn't a fecking speeding offence. Either the law applies, or it doesn't. If it does, he's just left his company with no defence at all when he is sued. If it doesn't, then in saying it does he's clearly so stupid he shouldn't even be running the DfE never mind a private company.
Utter madness. This is a company that whatever its financial state is clearly in the last throes of collapse.
Now, come on. There's a home for everyone at the DfE.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
Beyond the issue of a Minister of Crown green-lighting violations of law - international or otherwise - on grounds of "necessity, my question is this:
Can CEO of P&O be judged in contempt of the House of Commons? And Lords?
Ain't got a vote, but sure seems that way to me.
Just a day or so, to make the point that such pirates can NOT come before a parliamentary committee then brag about breaking the law and their determination to do it again if (they think it) need be.
I just cannot understand what he was thinking. Did he really assume that he would be able to say, 'yes we know the law, but it didn't suit us so we ignored it?' and that MPs would accept that?
This isn't a fecking speeding offence. Either the law applies, or it doesn't. If it does, he's just left his company with no defence at all when he is sued. If it doesn't, then in saying it does he's clearly so stupid he shouldn't even be running the DfE never mind a private company.
Utter madness. This is a company that whatever its financial state is clearly in the last throes of collapse.
It is an utterly cynical company. They probably worked out that no-one could stop them so decided to go ahead anyway. And may have thought that if Ministers got too cross they could probably point to what Ministers had themselves done/said.
Plus consultation is not just about whether the plans go ahead. It's also about the amount of compensation paid. The unions might have focused on getting a better package. From what I can see P&O have offered the bare minimum.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
Yes, take the George Costanza approach . . . and say the opposite!
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
I think it's pretty faux, unless those expressing outrage call for consequences, such as removing P&O from involvement in more profitable affairs such as free ports. If there are no financial consequences, a certain type of businessman will conclude that the worst that happens when you ignore your obligations is a rubbishing in a Select Committee.
Beyond the issue of a Minister of Crown green-lighting violations of law - international or otherwise - on grounds of "necessity, my question is this:
Can CEO of P&O be judged in contempt of the House of Commons? And Lords?
Ain't got a vote, but sure seems that way to me.
Just a day or so, to make the point that such pirates can NOT come before a parliamentary committee then brag about breaking the law and their determination to do it again if (they think it) need be.
I just cannot understand what he was thinking. Did he really assume that he would be able to say, 'yes we know the law, but it didn't suit us so we ignored it?' and that MPs would accept that?
This isn't a fecking speeding offence. Either the law applies, or it doesn't. If it does, he's just left his company with no defence at all when he is sued. If it doesn't, then in saying it does he's clearly so stupid he shouldn't even be running the DfE never mind a private company.
Utter madness. This is a company that whatever its financial state is clearly in the last throes of collapse.
It is an utterly cynical company. They probably worked out that no-one could stop them so decided to go ahead anyway. And may have thought that if Ministers got too cross they could probably point to what Ministers had themselves done/said.
Plus consultation is not just about whether the plans go ahead. It's also about the amount of compensation paid. The unions might have focused on getting a better package. From what I can see P&O have offered the bare minimum.
I'm honestly surprised this sort of comment doesn't happen more often. At lower levels there's any number of things which may well be even criminal but everyone knows the police couldn't give a rat's arse about, as they focus on other matters (beating up protestors and paying for lawyers to object to rulings, probably), and so in practice even if anyone reported it nothing would happen.
Hebblethwaite: I'm really sorry about the way we treated our workers, and I regret breaking the law. MP: Would you do the same again? Hebblethwaite: Oh yes, absolutely - no problem.
As apologies go, it's up there with Johnson's faux apologies for attending parties that never happened because they were work events.
To think I may have, entirely inadvertently to be sure, tweaked the nose of the Greeks who spent decades moaning like children about their northern neighbour using the name Macedonia out of some misplaced attempt at guarding their own history.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
I think it's pretty faux, unless those expressing outrage call for consequences, such as removing P&O from involvement in more profitable affairs such as free ports. If there are no financial consequences, a certain type of businessman will conclude that the worst that happens when you ignore your obligations is a rubbishing in a Select Committee.
If that is your bar for determining if it is faux then 95% of political comments are such.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
It's a very Lake District name: Bassenthwaite, Rossthwaite etc. Thwaite means wild land cleared for cultivation.
The outrage is the outrage at seeing one's own failings replayed to you, realising this so shouting loudly in the hope no-one will notice.
Apart from any moral qualms, who would want to sail on a ferry operated by an underpaid scratch crew? It must be a safety concern.
I prefer being ferried around by people who are mistreated, poorly trained and poorly equipped - the potential for disaster and/or staff uprising against the hated poshos really adds some spice to the experience.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
I think it is cognate with "hip" (heope) as in "hips and haws". But your mileage may vary, as it might also be a dialect for bridge. It's a weird compound anyway; because it doesn't show up as a name until C14 according good old https://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Hebblethwaite but has both Anglo Saxon and Norse roots in it.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I'm half inclined to write -
"Unlike Cressida Dick, Dido Harding and Paula Vennells, I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?"
Does this idiocy - words & deeds - by P&O present opportunity for Labour to call for > contempt proceedings & judgement versus P&O CEO > new legislation and/or enforcement/use of existing law, regulations, etc. to outlaw/prevent/punish P&O's actions re: maritime employment AND passenger safety
Somebody ought to do it, the sooner the better - aye, mateys, aye!
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?
What on earth makes you think they are looking for someone like that? That'd make them look bad.
Hebblethwaite: I'm really sorry about the way we treated our workers, and I regret breaking the law. MP: Would you do the same again? Hebblethwaite: Oh yes, absolutely - no problem.
As apologies go, it's up there with Johnson's faux apologies for attending parties that never happened because they were work events.
The yawning gap between ‘I’m sorry if’ and ‘I’m sorry for.’ See also Prince Charmless and his meaningless blather about the stain of slavery.
The government rarely breaks its own laws and publicly admits it.
Far more often, however, it conducts pointless consultations to rubber-stamp foregone conclusions. Having worked in government for many years I've seen more than my fair share of those. I can certainly understand the management's impatience with them, however much lawyers love them.
Since P&O have admitted that they knowingly broke the law, does anyone know what the maximum punishment is?
It's not the criminal law. They have failed to comply with employment law. The remedies are usually either an injunction to stop the company acting and/or compensation.
The more interesting question is what the company's underlying financial situation is and whether directors are in breach of various company law requirements, some of which may involve personal liability on the company's directors.
The government rarely breaks its own laws and publicly admits it.
Far more often, however, it conducts pointless consultations to rubber-stamp foregone conclusions. Having worked in government for many years I've seen more than my fair share of those. I can certainly understand the management's impatience with them, however much lawyers love them.
They are usually rubber stamping, yes, but like justice needing to be seen to be done, it is important for decision makers to prove they follow correct processes. It at least gives the possibility of catching errors and changing tune, and that possibilitu cannot be discounted as worthless.
As a old seadog, with more saltwater down the hatch than you've had hot tea AND warm beer, I am outraged by the outrageous acts perpetrated by the buccaneers at the helm of the P&0.
I'd say such dastards deserve keelhauling IF it warn't too good for such foul flotsam.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?
What on earth makes you think they are looking for someone like that? That'd make them look bad.
We fought wars over establishing the principle that even the Monarch was not above the Law.
Hopefully it won't come to that, but the longer we leave it the worse it will get. The current government have scant regard for the law. The opposition have many failings, surely many grievous failings, but there can be few things that are as important or fundamental as respect for the rule of law.
Lawmakers cannot be lawbreakers. All those with respect for the law must do all that they can to drive the Tories from office. When there are in opposition they will learn that one function of the law is to protect those not in power from those who are, and hopefully they will remember the next time they are in power.
I hope someone has made the point that P&O Ferries is a completely separate business from P&O Cruises. The tendency of journalists and others just to refer to P&O may save keystrokes but it can unfairly malign a business from which the ferries were separated more than 20 years ago. The recent behaviour of P&O Ferries is inexcusable.
Since P&O have admitted that they knowingly broke the law, does anyone know what the maximum punishment is?
It's not the criminal law. They have failed to comply with employment law. The remedies are usually either an injunction to stop the company acting and/or compensation.
The more interesting question is what the company's underlying financial situation is and whether directors are in breach of various company law requirements, some of which may involve personal liability on the company's directors.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
The government rarely breaks its own laws and publicly admits it.
Far more often, however, it conducts pointless consultations to rubber-stamp foregone conclusions. Having worked in government for many years I've seen more than my fair share of those. I can certainly understand the management's impatience with them, however much lawyers love them.
They are usually rubber stamping, yes, but like justice needing to be seen to be done, it is important for decision makers to prove they follow correct processes. It at least gives the possibility of catching errors and changing tune, and that possibilitu cannot be discounted as worthless.
In any case, injustice delayed is better than injustice NOW!
Besides, having to stand up and justify shitty acts in front of another person does act as a disincentive for shitty behaviour. See not only the decision not to consult, but also the sacking-by-video-message.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I'm half inclined to write -
"Unlike Cressida Dick, Dido Harding and Paula Vennells, I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?"
I may dress it up a bit .....
I'd go with something like, "I've always pushed the envelope in my career, now I'm looking for a job I can stamp my authority on. I know how to lay down the letter of the law without resorting to parcelling out blame. I'm the full package, and I always deliver. As an applicant, I am simply first class."
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I'm half inclined to write -
"Unlike Cressida Dick, Dido Harding and Paula Vennells, I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?"
I may dress it up a bit .....
I'd go with something like, "I've always pushed the envelope in my career, now I'm looking for a job I can stamp my authority on. I know how to lay down the letter of the law without resorting to parcelling out blame. I'm the full package, and I always deliver. As an applicant, I am simply first class."
This is a brilliant header - an absolute masterpiece. Linking the Johnsonian casualness towards the "law" with the conduct of P&O ferries. Not an angle I thought of.
I also think that P&O probably made a ruthless but ultimately brilliant calculation. The pay off the workers get may well be better than may otherwise have been the case had the company gone in to a protacted industrial relations struggle and subsequently gone bust.
"Rishi Sunak refuses to answer questions about his millionaire wife's stake in Indian firm with Russian connections amid western sanctions after being asked if his family 'could be benefitting from Putin's regime'."
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
This is a brilliant header - an absolute masterpiece. Linking the Johnsonian casualness towards the "law" with the conduct of P&O ferries. Not an angle I thought of.
I also think that P&O probably made a ruthless but ultimately brilliant calculation. The pay off the workers get may well be better than may otherwise have been the case had the company gone in to a protacted industrial relations struggle and subsequently gone bust.
Thank you.
It was the first thing that came to mind as I heard Huw Merriman, Chair of the Select Committe, on the WATO today driving home from Keswick.
How long do you think before someone in Labour makes the same point? Or a journalist asks it of a Tory MP?
People have no memory. One of the skills of an investigator is having a bloody good memory and the ability to see links, spot patterns, make connections. It's what MPs and journalists should be doing too.
Apart from any moral qualms, who would want to sail on a ferry operated by an underpaid scratch crew? It must be a safety concern.
That's a tad xenophobic is it not? My understanding is that like nursing, given the likes of the Philippines is traditionally a maritime nation and accounts for one fifth of the world’s seagoing personnel, and it is considered a very reliable source for quality seafarers.
What was revealed today is that the union claims of £2 / hr don't appear to be true. The P&O boss stated min it is £5.5-6.0 / hr, which is above international averages for these jobs.
Doesn't make P&O actions morally right, but it isn't instantly true that because Johnny Foreigner Filipinos on £6/hr means it is a safety concern, anymore than the NHS hiring in lots of trained Filipino nurses over the past 15 years.
In a way, dropping the pretence would count as progress
From BBC:
About 2,700 people were able to leave the besieged and destroyed city of Mariupol today, Ukraine's deputy prime minister says...
Russia has taken control of parts of the city. In one such area it handed out supplies to hundreds of residents who emerged from their places of shelter, according to a Reuters news report from the city.
At the scene was Denis Pushilin, the leader of the Russian-backed separatist enclave of Donetsk, as well as an official from Putin's United Russia party, Andrei Turchak, according to pro-Russian separatist media.
Turchak wrote on his Telegram channel that Russia would rebuild Mariupol but added - "Make no mistake, Russia is here forever".
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
The government rarely breaks its own laws and publicly admits it.
Far more often, however, it conducts pointless consultations to rubber-stamp foregone conclusions. Having worked in government for many years I've seen more than my fair share of those. I can certainly understand the management's impatience with them, however much lawyers love them.
They are usually rubber stamping, yes, but like justice needing to be seen to be done, it is important for decision makers to prove they follow correct processes. It at least gives the possibility of catching errors and changing tune, and that possibilitu cannot be discounted as worthless.
It is not worthless, but on the other hand consultation is not costless either. Where the right dividing line is, is of course a matter of opinion.
I can see why government decisions should be subject to consultation, because the government has no profit incentive to get the answer right in the way that the private sector does, and has powers of compulsion that businesses do not have.
But management should be allowed to manage, with the bottom line the judge of whether or not the decision was correct.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
Apart from any moral qualms, who would want to sail on a ferry operated by an underpaid scratch crew? It must be a safety concern.
That's a tad xenophobic is it not? My understanding is that like nursing, given the likes of the Philippines is traditionally a maritime nation and accounts for one fifth of the world’s seagoing personnel, and it is considered a very reliable source for quality seafarers.
What was revealed today is that the union claims of £2 / hr don't appear to be true. The P&O boss stated min it is £5.5-6.0 / hr, which is above international averages for these jobs.
Doesn't make P&O actions morally right, but it isn't instantly true that because Johnny Foreigner Filipinos on £6/hr means it is a safety concern, anymore than the NHS hiring in lots of trained Filipino nurses over the past 15 years.
I am not doubting the professional abilities of Philipinos, or whoever. Just that any entirely new crew takes time to work as a team and in a safe way.
Been comparing the Ukrainian MOD figures for Russian casualties (first number) with the confirmed kills from Oryx (number in parentheses).
One would certainly expect the numbers of actual casualties to be way higher than the Oryx figure, given each claimed kill there has to have been photographed and identified as a unique vehicle. But what do PBers think: given the lower Oryx figures, are the UkrMOD figures credible?
UkrMOD/(Oryx)
Aircraft: 108 (15) Helos: 124 (35)
The Ukrainians are obviously lying for obvious reasons but the aircraft claims are just ridiculous. When you've got one pilot who has claimed more kills in a week than the best three Israeli jet aces got over their entire careers combined you know you're in piss take territory.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
I don't think anyone has ever denied Johnson's brilliance at evading responsibility.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
I think to be a brilliant example it shouldn't feel like I'm getting whiplash from the change in subject matter.
Not that he is without political skill, I think those of us who dislike him can fall into that trap and pretend it is all down to luck or something, but not sure that is a very good example of it.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
"How did that work with Blair and Iraq, PM?" should have been Nick Watts' next question.
Good Tory hold in Seghill and Seaton Delaval in Northumberland. Tories hold their Majority on the council. Well done for Stodge and dixiedean for calling it.
Labour certainly has major issues at a local level in Blyth Valley constituency which was apparent last year. Labour also got 73% in this ward in 2013.
Been comparing the Ukrainian MOD figures for Russian casualties (first number) with the confirmed kills from Oryx (number in parentheses).
One would certainly expect the numbers of actual casualties to be way higher than the Oryx figure, given each claimed kill there has to have been photographed and identified as a unique vehicle. But what do PBers think: given the lower Oryx figures, are the UkrMOD figures credible?
UkrMOD/(Oryx)
Aircraft: 108 (15) Helos: 124 (35)
The Ukrainians are obviously lying for obvious reasons but the aircraft claims are just ridiculous. When you've got one pilot who has claimed more kills in a week than the best three Israeli jet aces got over their entire careers combined you know you're in piss take territory.
Hard to tell what's a UAV and what's a piloted aircraft from a distance too.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
Apart from any moral qualms, who would want to sail on a ferry operated by an underpaid scratch crew? It must be a safety concern.
That's a tad xenophobic is it not? My understanding is that like nursing, given the likes of the Philippines is traditionally a maritime nation and accounts for one fifth of the world’s seagoing personnel, and it is considered a very reliable source for quality seafarers.
What was revealed today is that the union claims of £2 / hr don't appear to be true. The P&O boss stated min it is £5.5-6.0 / hr, which is above international averages for these jobs.
Doesn't make P&O actions morally right, but it isn't instantly true that because Johnny Foreigner Filipinos on £6/hr means it is a safety concern, anymore than the NHS hiring in lots of trained Filipino nurses over the past 15 years.
I am not doubting the professional abilities of Philipinos, or whoever. Just that any entirely new crew takes time to work as a team and in a safe way.
Quite. Poor workplace communication and a stand off relationship between crew and supervisors were two of the reasons for the Zeebrugge disaster in 1987.
Been comparing the Ukrainian MOD figures for Russian casualties (first number) with the confirmed kills from Oryx (number in parentheses).
One would certainly expect the numbers of actual casualties to be way higher than the Oryx figure, given each claimed kill there has to have been photographed and identified as a unique vehicle. But what do PBers think: given the lower Oryx figures, are the UkrMOD figures credible?
UkrMOD/(Oryx)
Aircraft: 108 (15) Helos: 124 (35)
The Ukrainians are obviously lying for obvious reasons but the aircraft claims are just ridiculous. When you've got one pilot who has claimed more kills in a week than the best three Israeli jet aces got over their entire careers combined you know you're in piss take territory.
See similar numbers for over enthusiastic claims from the Battle of Britain. But the lower figures are likely an underestimate, even if not massively so.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
I believe it's short for "cockwomble".
Is that something that features in Jennifer Acuri's latest revelations re: Boris Johnson?
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
I think to be a brilliant example it shouldn't feel like I'm getting whiplash from the change in subject matter.
Not that he is without political skill, I think those of us who dislike him can fall into that trap and pretend it is all down to luck or something, but not sure that is a very good example of it.
Yes, it is certainly a factor that those of us who usually dismiss him and all his works can miss his abilities.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
"How did that work with Blair and Iraq, PM?" should have been Nick Watts' next question.
To which the reply would presumably be that only a complete moron would imply any moral equivalence between anything in Iraq and Ukraine.
John 'make BBC like netflix' Whittingdale as head of Ofcom?
That John?
Its hard to imagine right now the BBC becoming as good as Netflix, but why cap their ambitions?
If the BBC think they can rival Netflix in the future, good luck to them, if they can find the subscribers.
On current trend, give it a few more years, and Netflix will become as good as the BBC.
In a relatively few years, the BBC will cease non-internet broadcasting. The frequencies will be reused for other purposes.
The BBC will be a streaming service, delivering all content by that mechanism.
On the other hand, maybe in a few years' time people will get sick of using the internet for everything and go back to using analogue technology.
And pigs might fly.....
One real danger is too much fragmentation. We have gone from Netflix being THE streaming service, to Amazon, Disney+ / Hulu, Discovery+, HBO, etc etc etc all in a couple of years. I think could be a big mistake. The reason Spotify works is it is basically a one stop shop for all the music you need (the odd artist not being on there really doesn't detract from your experience).
I presume what we will see is bundling, but still if it becomes something stupid per month, people aren't going to dig it for long.
BBC are at a crossroads. If they choose to fight to the death for another 10 years of the current model, they aren't going to die, but totally unenforceable licence fee, young people uninterested, they will just keep falling further and further behind.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
I don't think anyone has ever denied Johnson's brilliance at evading responsibility.
Indeed. But he has a rare talent as to how he goes about that job of work.
It takes an imaginative sod to turn questions about his moral behaviour into a riff about the free press in Russia.
Apart from any moral qualms, who would want to sail on a ferry operated by an underpaid scratch crew? It must be a safety concern.
That's a tad xenophobic is it not? My understanding is that like nursing, given the likes of the Philippines is traditionally a maritime nation and accounts for one fifth of the world’s seagoing personnel, and it is considered a very reliable source for quality seafarers.
What was revealed today is that the union claims of £2 / hr don't appear to be true. The P&O boss stated min it is £5.5-6.0 / hr, which is above international averages for these jobs.
Doesn't make P&O actions morally right, but it isn't instantly true that because Johnny Foreigner Filipinos on £6/hr means it is a safety concern, anymore than the NHS hiring in lots of trained Filipino nurses over the past 15 years.
I am not doubting the professional abilities of Philipinos, or whoever. Just that any entirely new crew takes time to work as a team and in a safe way.
Quite. Poor workplace communication and a stand off relationship between crew and supervisors were two of the reasons for the Zeebrugge disaster in 1987.
Along with flouting safety rules to meet turn around times (i.e. profits) and working crew so hard they (he) literally fell asleep on the job, while another notices the bow doors were open but did nothing about it (or even tell anyone) because it was not his job.
I know it was not what I should take away from all this, but Mr Hebblethwaite may just be the most English name I've ever seen.
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
"thwaite" is Norse word, meaning "meadow". I don't know who or what a hebble is.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
"How did that work with Blair and Iraq, PM?" should have been Nick Watts' next question.
To which the reply would presumably be that only a complete moron would imply any moral equivalence between anything in Iraq and Ukraine.
You're missing the point. We had a free press asking questions of the PM. It did not stop him making a mistake over Iraq. Boris's implication that in a free country with a free press bad foreign policy mistakes are avoided is simply not borne out by our own recent history.
Since P&O have admitted that they knowingly broke the law, does anyone know what the maximum punishment is?
It's not the criminal law. They have failed to comply with employment law. The remedies are usually either an injunction to stop the company acting and/or compensation.
The more interesting question is what the company's underlying financial situation is and whether directors are in breach of various company law requirements, some of which may involve personal liability on the company's directors.
Breach of the statutory duty to consult does leave open the company to an unlimited fine.
Why doesn’t Kate Andrews just join the Tory party and stop pretending that she’s an objective commentator? Their current mutation must correspond pretty well with her world view.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I'm half inclined to write -
"Unlike Cressida Dick, Dido Harding and Paula Vennells, I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?"
I may dress it up a bit .....
You may have to explain "woman".....
And then competence. It seems to be an ungrasped concept.
The Northumberland election is a ward in the Blyth Valley constituency that went Tory for the first time at the last GE.
Indeed. But that won't exist next time. Cramlington and Whitley Bay will be a fascinating one. Half a Tory trending new town. The other half a mix of bail hostels and zhizhi hipsterland. Labour territory. Blyth and Ashington should be solid Labour.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
"How did that work with Blair and Iraq, PM?" should have been Nick Watts' next question.
Blair remained PM for another term.
Iraq was freed from a sadistic maniac who waged war on his near neighbours.
Been comparing the Ukrainian MOD figures for Russian casualties (first number) with the confirmed kills from Oryx (number in parentheses).
One would certainly expect the numbers of actual casualties to be way higher than the Oryx figure, given each claimed kill there has to have been photographed and identified as a unique vehicle. But what do PBers think: given the lower Oryx figures, are the UkrMOD figures credible?
UkrMOD/(Oryx)
Aircraft: 108 (15) Helos: 124 (35)
The Ukrainians are obviously lying for obvious reasons but the aircraft claims are just ridiculous. When you've got one pilot who has claimed more kills in a week than the best three Israeli jet aces got over their entire careers combined you know you're in piss take territory.
Hard to tell what's a UAV and what's a piloted aircraft from a distance too.
Good Tory hold in Seghill and Seaton Delaval in Northumberland. Tories hold their Majority on the council. Well done for Stodge and dixiedean for calling it.
Labour certainly has major issues at a local level in Blyth Valley constituency which was apparent last year. Labour also got 73% in this ward in 2013.
The Budget clearly a disaster in northern red wa...hang on, that can't be right.....
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
"How did that work with Blair and Iraq, PM?" should have been Nick Watts' next question.
To which the reply would presumably be that only a complete moron would imply any moral equivalence between anything in Iraq and Ukraine.
You're missing the point. We had a free press asking questions of the PM. It did not stop him making a mistake over Iraq. Boris's implication that in a free country with a free press bad foreign policy mistakes are avoided is simply not borne out by our own recent history.
His point was ‘why are you asking me about this when there’s a war going on ?’ Logic isn’t really a feature of his discourse.
Good Tory hold in Seghill and Seaton Delaval in Northumberland. Tories hold their Majority on the council. Well done for Stodge and dixiedean for calling it.
Labour certainly has major issues at a local level in Blyth Valley constituency which was apparent last year. Labour also got 73% in this ward in 2013.
The Budget clearly a disaster in northern red wa...hang on, that can't be right.....
If you think Seghill is the Red Wall you clearly haven't visited recently.
Now and again, one is reminded of Johnson's strange brilliance.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
"How did that work with Blair and Iraq, PM?" should have been Nick Watts' next question.
To which the reply would presumably be that only a complete moron would imply any moral equivalence between anything in Iraq and Ukraine.
You're missing the point. We had a free press asking questions of the PM. It did not stop him making a mistake over Iraq. Boris's implication that in a free country with a free press bad foreign policy mistakes are avoided is simply not borne out by our own recent history.
His point was ‘why are you asking me about this when there’s a war going on ?’ Logic isn’t really a feature of his discourse.
No, I don't think that was Johnson's point at all.
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
". I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone"
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
I'm half inclined to write -
"Unlike Cressida Dick, Dido Harding and Paula Vennells, I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?"
I may dress it up a bit .....
You may have to explain "woman".....
And then competence. It seems to be an ungrasped concept.
Adult human female.
Competent woman - someone who cleans up the mess made by others.
Comments
Johnson is outraged at P & O. I am sure he is, he certainly should be.
Oh, and first.
No.
Beyond the issue of a Minister of Crown green-lighting violations of law - international or otherwise - on grounds of "necessity, my question is this:
Can CEO of P&O be judged in contempt of the House of Commons? And Lords?
Ain't got a vote, but sure seems that way to me.
Just a day or so, to make the point that such pirates can NOT come before a parliamentary committee then brag about breaking the law and their determination to do it again if (they think it) need be.
EDIT - BTW, do we know approximate size & remuneration of P&O "payroll vote" in Parliament? Am assuming it is greater than zero both ways.
This isn't a fecking speeding offence. Either the law applies, or it doesn't. If it does, he's just left his company with no defence at all when he is sued. If it doesn't, then in saying it does he's clearly so stupid he shouldn't even be running the DfE never mind a private company.
Utter madness. This is a company that whatever its financial state is clearly in the last throes of collapse.
https://publicappointments.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/appointment/chair-post-office-limited/
I know all about culture change and banking. I am independent - possibly too much so, have personal resilience and won't take any shit from anyone. And I have huge experience clearing up other's shit. Etc etc.
On the other hand it wouldn't exactly be an easy life ...
Hmm .....🤔
Things NOT to say at an interview with this lot.
Did this always [==post war] used to happen, but it never got the publicity?
I take issue with a part of the final paragraph though. I don't think the outrage is itself faux outrage, it is merely inconsistent and hypocritical outrage given the approach endosed previously.
Plus consultation is not just about whether the plans go ahead. It's also about the amount of compensation paid. The unions might have focused on getting a better package. From what I can see P&O have offered the bare minimum.
Hebblethwaite: I'm really sorry about the way we treated our workers, and I regret breaking the law.
MP: Would you do the same again?
Hebblethwaite: Oh yes, absolutely - no problem.
As apologies go, it's up there with Johnson's faux apologies for attending parties that never happened because they were work events.
The outrage is the outrage at seeing one's own failings replayed to you, realising this so shouting loudly in the hope no-one will notice.
Since P&O have admitted that they knowingly broke the law, does anyone know what the maximum punishment is?
"Unlike Cressida Dick, Dido Harding and Paula Vennells, I am a competent woman who has put the right people in prison. Isn't it about time you tried appointing someone who's good at her job?"
I may dress it up a bit .....
> contempt proceedings & judgement versus P&O CEO
> new legislation and/or enforcement/use of existing law, regulations, etc. to outlaw/prevent/punish P&O's actions re: maritime employment AND passenger safety
Somebody ought to do it, the sooner the better - aye, mateys, aye!
Far more often, however, it conducts pointless consultations to rubber-stamp foregone conclusions. Having worked in government for many years I've seen more than my fair share of those. I can certainly understand the management's impatience with them, however much lawyers love them.
The more interesting question is what the company's underlying financial situation is and whether directors are in breach of various company law requirements, some of which may involve personal liability on the company's directors.
As a old seadog, with more saltwater down the hatch than you've had hot tea AND warm beer, I am outraged by the outrageous acts perpetrated by the buccaneers at the helm of the P&0.
I'd say such dastards deserve keelhauling IF it warn't too good for such foul flotsam.
Yr quasi-obedient s'rv'nt,
Captain Crunch
Truly the Ukr war has changed the world!
Hopefully it won't come to that, but the longer we leave it the worse it will get. The current government have scant regard for the law. The opposition have many failings, surely many grievous failings, but there can be few things that are as important or fundamental as respect for the rule of law.
Lawmakers cannot be lawbreakers. All those with respect for the law must do all that they can to drive the Tories from office. When there are in opposition they will learn that one function of the law is to protect those not in power from those who are, and hopefully they will remember the next time they are in power.
Doesn't work for everyone, of course.
Ah, my coats.
I also think that P&O probably made a ruthless but ultimately brilliant calculation. The pay off the workers get may well be better than may otherwise have been the case had the company gone in to a protacted industrial relations struggle and subsequently gone bust.
"Rishi Sunak refuses to answer questions about his millionaire wife's stake in Indian firm with Russian connections amid western sanctions after being asked if his family 'could be benefitting from Putin's regime'."
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FOo25ajVUBYUEME?format=jpg&name=small
Sounds like a virtual NATO associate status without the article 5.
It was the first thing that came to mind as I heard Huw Merriman, Chair of the Select Committe, on the WATO today driving home from Keswick.
How long do you think before someone in Labour makes the same point? Or a journalist asks it of a Tory MP?
People have no memory. One of the skills of an investigator is having a bloody good memory and the ability to see links, spot patterns, make connections. It's what MPs and journalists should be doing too.
What was revealed today is that the union claims of £2 / hr don't appear to be true. The P&O boss stated min it is £5.5-6.0 / hr, which is above international averages for these jobs.
Doesn't make P&O actions morally right, but it isn't instantly true that because Johnny Foreigner Filipinos on £6/hr means it is a safety concern, anymore than the NHS hiring in lots of trained Filipino nurses over the past 15 years.
From BBC:
About 2,700 people were able to leave the besieged and destroyed city of Mariupol today, Ukraine's deputy prime minister says...
Russia has taken control of parts of the city. In one such area it handed out supplies to hundreds of residents who emerged from their places of shelter, according to a Reuters news report from the city.
At the scene was Denis Pushilin, the leader of the Russian-backed separatist enclave of Donetsk, as well as an official from Putin's United Russia party, Andrei Turchak, according to pro-Russian separatist media.
Turchak wrote on his Telegram channel that Russia would rebuild Mariupol but added - "Make no mistake, Russia is here forever".
(All using private emails for some part of it....)
'Private emails reveal Gove’s role in Tory-linked firm’s PPE deals'
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/mar/24/michael-gove-private-emails-ppe-deals-tory-linked-firms
Seems like scummery to me.
I can see why government decisions should be subject to consultation, because the government has no profit incentive to get the answer right in the way that the private sector does, and has powers of compulsion that businesses do not have.
But management should be allowed to manage, with the bottom line the judge of whether or not the decision was correct.
Asked by Nick Watt about partygate, the PM manages to turn the question around to be about why a free press that can ask such questions is so important and how it would never happen in Putin's Russia. Putin he says would never have invaded Ukr if journalists such as Watt could ask him questions all the time about why he thought it would work or was a good idea.
Naturally, Johnson did not answer the original question. But still...
Not that he is without political skill, I think those of us who dislike him can fall into that trap and pretend it is all down to luck or something, but not sure that is a very good example of it.
Labour certainly has major issues at a local level in Blyth Valley constituency which was apparent last year. Labour also got 73% in this ward in 2013.
But the lower figures are likely an underestimate, even if not massively so.
One real danger is too much fragmentation. We have gone from Netflix being THE streaming service, to Amazon, Disney+ / Hulu, Discovery+, HBO, etc etc etc all in a couple of years. I think could be a big mistake. The reason Spotify works is it is basically a one stop shop for all the music you need (the odd artist not being on there really doesn't detract from your experience).
I presume what we will see is bundling, but still if it becomes something stupid per month, people aren't going to dig it for long.
BBC are at a crossroads. If they choose to fight to the death for another 10 years of the current model, they aren't going to die, but totally unenforceable licence fee, young people uninterested, they will just keep falling further and further behind.
It takes an imaginative sod to turn questions about his moral behaviour into a riff about the free press in Russia.
https://vote-2012.proboards.com/post/1219967/thread
And then competence. It seems to be an ungrasped concept.
Blyth and Ashington should be solid Labour.
Iraq was freed from a sadistic maniac who waged war on his near neighbours.
Next question.
Categories can be problematic.
https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop/status/1507048000140595208
Logic isn’t really a feature of his discourse.
Competent woman - someone who cleans up the mess made by others.
Next ......
Bought one. Hand forged and hand smithed on Bodmin Moor from recycled high-grade car metal (some obscure engine part, I think)
God's honest truth: this is the best chef's knife I have ever used. Alarmingly sharp. Chops through veg like it is Cornish mist off Carn Brae
The blade will of course get blunt, and I do not know if I can sharpen it back to its present state. But, its present state is WOW
https://www.atkinson-art.co.uk/product-category/wolf-dingo-chef-knives-for-valhalla/
"some obscure engine part" is one for @Dura_Ace though?