Best Of
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
I suspect Burnham’s biggest change or reversion to mean will be making decisions. By all accounts, Starmer tried to delegate this away from himself constantly.
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Its a really important decision because it will do so much to shape his government. He also needs a Chancellor who can survive the buffeting that is coming from both the markets and from inside the party as so many have to learn yet again that austerity was not a choice but a necessity.I expect quite strongly that Burnham will continue current net zero policies, just as Miliband continued previous Conservative government policies under Starmer.
I would be very concerned if it was Ed Miliband. He has some relevant experience but the policies he has promoted in Environment through both net zero and in the North Sea have been hugely damaging and anti-growth.
Louise Haigh, in my opinion, has neither the skills or experience for it but its not unusual for the person who has run a successful campaign for the leader to get it. I suspect she is undervalued.
Streeting has shown he is quick and robust in the way he has faced down the most powerful unions in the country at Health. His problem, and the reason he is not a candidate, is that he has very little of a following in the party (like Reeves in that respect) so he doesn't add any great strength to the ticket. He's probably rightly favourite though and I suspect the markets would like it.
I don't think that Yvette Cooper has the stamina for it given her health problems.
Mahmood would be a possibility, especially if Burnham wanted another woman in the role.
I do expect the rhetoric to change though from moral necessity for the planet to these are the future industries and energy security. I also expect Burnham to be much more engaged than Starmer who handed everything off to Miliband.
2
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Keep Mahmood in place. Keep up the good work.Seriously, Mahmood looks like a good option but if you've got a Home Secretary who is perceived to be doing well don't change that, you're unlikley to find another one.I think she has said she wants to remain Home Secretary.
Unless Burnham intends to cave in to the handwringers when it comes to immigration and law & order.
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Morning all,
I think Wes will be CoE, personally.
BTW massive thunderstorms and lightning over part of southern England last night. Map of strikes here:
https://www.lightningmaps.org/?lang=gb#google_vignette;z=7;t=3;y=50.0383;x=-0.5651;d=2;dl=2;dc=0;ts24=1;m=oss;s=0;o=0;b=0.00;ts=0;
I think Wes will be CoE, personally.
BTW massive thunderstorms and lightning over part of southern England last night. Map of strikes here:
https://www.lightningmaps.org/?lang=gb#google_vignette;z=7;t=3;y=50.0383;x=-0.5651;d=2;dl=2;dc=0;ts24=1;m=oss;s=0;o=0;b=0.00;ts=0;
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen. Pray silence for the entry of BatteryCorrectHorse!BatteryCorrectHorseMay I enquire about this new tradition? I've been wondering whether it's your butler announcing you've joined the thread.
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
BatteryCorrectHorseMay I enquire about this new tradition? I've been wondering whether it's your butler announcing you've joined the thread.
5
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Good morningI don't think Mahmood has done a good job as Home Secretary. Her immigration policy is a mess, leaving aside whether you agree with its aims. Relatedly but separately she is despised by anyone who is slightly liberal, which is almost everyone in the Labour Party along with most people who might vote for it.A Labour Home Sec despised by the membership is clearly doing a good job.
The membership live in cloud cuckoo land.
Interesting Trevor Phillips commented last night that Labour talk much about country first party second, when the evidence is much the opposite from attacking Mahmood immigration policies to the abolition of the 2 child cap where the country are in the opposite position
He also said the dog that didn't bark in Makerfield was Gaza
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Its a really important decision because it will do so much to shape his government. He also needs a Chancellor who can survive the buffeting that is coming from both the markets and from inside the party as so many have to learn yet again that austerity was not a choice but a necessity.It needs to be someone who will stand up for the interests of the country against the dead hand of the Treasury, and finally start to undo Osborne’s damage,
I would be very concerned if it was Ed Miliband. He has some relevant experience but the policies he has promoted in Environment through both net zero and in the North Sea have been hugely damaging and anti-growth.
Louise Haigh, in my opinion, has neither the skills or experience for it but its not unusual for the person who has run a successful campaign for the leader to get it. I suspect she is undervalued.
Streeting has shown he is quick and robust in the way he has faced down the most powerful unions in the country at Health. His problem, and the reason he is not a candidate, is that he has very little of a following in the party (like Reeves in that respect) so he doesn't add any great strength to the ticket. He's probably rightly favourite though and I suspect the markets would like it.
I don't think that Yvette Cooper has the stamina for it given her health problems.
Mahmood would be a possibility, especially if Burnham wanted another woman in the role.
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
I don't think Mahmood has done a good job as Home Secretary. Her immigration policy is a mess, leaving aside whether you agree with its aims. Relatedly but separately she is despised by anyone who is slightly liberal, which is almost everyone in the Labour Party along with most people who might vote for it.Streeting for me. Sane enough not to spook the markets. EdM might spoil the markets and I'd keep him at energy where he seems to have a genuine interest and passion and doing some of the right things. I think a chancellor who can also explain things well and come across as positive would be a good thing: Streeting. Plus keep your enemies close etc... I don't seem EdM as a serious future leadership contender, nor Mahmood for FF43's reasons, above.
Selebian
2
Re: Who will be Andy Burnham’s Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
So if Mahmood is doing a good job as Home Secretary why move her ?
Just because someone does well in one job doesn't mean that they will do well in a different job.
Just because someone does well in one job doesn't mean that they will do well in a different job.



