Best Of
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
Junior doctors vote to go on strike.Some of us pointed out that if you give in so keenly to strikers, they are quick to come back for more.
How is Streeting being talked about as the next leader? He got a bigger budget and what has he delivered?
Cookie
1
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
No, I am not.I'd have thought a libertarian like you would have been all for the right to strike.Indeed, if they don't like the wage, they're welcome to resign and let someone else fill the vacancy.Tough. You can't coerce people into working in the NHS - you have to pay them a fair wage.I simply do not accept thatDoctors reject government offer and strikes will go aheadThe NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.
Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police
Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
As Badenoch says minimum levels of service would be required
Ultimately the country cannot be blackmailed by vested interests
Imagine if the police went on strike
NHS productivity has grown by 5%* since 2010, and their wages cut by 20%. If it were a free labour market they'd be paid much more than they are now.
*14% before 2020.
Striking is not the same as resigning.
You are surely not saying we should legislate to limit such an individual liberty?
But I equally think any employer should be able to terminate, without notice, anyone who goes on strike.
If you don't want the job then feel free to not work, but don't complain if your employer then offers that job to someone who does want it.
To strike, not work, but also bedblock that job so nobody else can do it permanently either is not liberal either.
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
one way of making sure you don't spend much at xmasI've just put a couple of cheques in the post for Christmas presents. 😒I thought Post Offices will bank cheques for you. (As a bonus, you could end up with a double credit if they use Horizon.)Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
Edit: According to Gemini: "Yes, you can bank cheques at thousands of Post Office branches across the UK, provided your bank offers this service. Most major UK banks participate in this service, but you should confirm with your specific bank. Note that some banks like Halifax and Lloyds are ending this service from December 31, 2025"
Ooops
malcolmg
1
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
The lesson of Trump 2.0 is that he is a narcissistic sociopath, and lots of people voted for him because they like that,
Scott_xP
1
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
Yup - he's really old and not in the best state.It's been so obvious, since well before the last presidential election.I’m starting to think ScottXP may be right and the Trumpdozer is suffering from cognitive decline.
Sam Freedman
@samfr.bsky.social
Starting to think that the President going completely mad might force his party to act next year.
https://bsky.app/profile/samfr.bsky.social/post/3m7zy644azu2q
Compare him (or Biden) to Reagan's last speech. And Reagan was supposed to be out to lunch at this point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R8QxCD6ir8&t=2s
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781If only there was something he was in a position to do about it.
NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces
"Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"
Taz
1
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781
NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces
"Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"
NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces
"Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
He is suffering rapid and serious mental declineI checked multiple sources on social media before posting it as, even by Trumps standards, I found that hard to fathom.Apparently this is real !!!!It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
Gobsmacked.
Especially after Rob Reiners dignified comments in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, given they were politically miles apart.
Scott_xP
1
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
I see that. But for me the monstrosity of Trump is worse. This person should not be in any position of power let alone the WH. It's absurd and it's pure drip drip poison. It's like he's seeking out everything decent in this world and shitting on it. And what a damaging role model. Emboldening and validating all the wrong things and all the wrong people. It's no choice at all but I'd rather have a straight up 'hate his ideas and his policies and everything he stands for' politician as president.That Reiner post from the President of the United States. I mean c'mon. This surely isn't tolerable for much longer. It's beyond bad, it's just wrong. There has to be a way. If it gives us Vance so be it.If it was anyone but Vance I would agree. But Vance it would be.
At least, Trump in his narcissism and suggestibility can be played both ways even if, fundamentally, he's malignantly egotistical.
Vance, on the other hand, encourages all Trump's worst instincts when it comes to foreign affairs. It's his influence Starmer, Merz, etc, are trying to counter. It would be frying pan into the fire for us in Europe if JD takes over.
kinabalu
2
Re: Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com
The 86 year old chair of the parish council does this when he's trying to send me agenda and other bullshit I'll never read.
C:\Users\Sean\OneDrive\Documents\The Strong Cannot Always Do As They Will.docx
Dura_Ace
1



