Best Of
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
"Badenoch considers burka banNo, live and let live. If women, or men, want to wear a burqa why not ?
Tories understood to be ‘looking closely’ at merits of veto on face coverings as part of a review of Islamism"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/03/27/kemi-badenoch-conservatives-burka-ban/
Poignantly, I saw a woman in a full burqa today, not far from my flat. I cannot know her inner state but her body language expressed great unhappiness. Weighed down by these hideous deathly black shrouds. I do not believe any woman under 60 - if any - would voluntarily wear these appalling garments, They are symbols of misogyny and TOOLS of misogyny
Kemi is right. Ban them
Taz
1
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
Evening,
Please give me some good news.
Love'n'kisses,
solarflare
Please give me some good news.
Love'n'kisses,
solarflare
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
Israel claims that Iran presents an existential threat.
Regardless of Iranian threats, that is clearly nonsense. Israel has nukes and the backing of the US.
However for the first time in its existence, it is facing a possible existential threat, namely the removal of US support.
Israel is a small country of about 10 million people without significant natural resources, surrounded by enemies. It needs the US.
The polls in the US are moving decisively against support for Israel, particularly among the young.
I don't think Israelis, the majority of whom support the war against Iran, are aware of this potential threat.
Regardless of Iranian threats, that is clearly nonsense. Israel has nukes and the backing of the US.
However for the first time in its existence, it is facing a possible existential threat, namely the removal of US support.
Israel is a small country of about 10 million people without significant natural resources, surrounded by enemies. It needs the US.
The polls in the US are moving decisively against support for Israel, particularly among the young.
I don't think Israelis, the majority of whom support the war against Iran, are aware of this potential threat.
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
SCHLAPP: Who wants to see impeachment hearings?
CPAC CROWD: *cheers*
SCHLAPP: No. That was the wrong answer.
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mi2jraxpzk2f
CPAC CROWD: *cheers*
SCHLAPP: No. That was the wrong answer.
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mi2jraxpzk2f
Foxy
1
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
Westminster Voting Intention:The Reform slide is OVER
RFM: 28% (+1)
LAB: 19% (-1)
CON: 18% (=)
GRN: 16% (+2)
LDM: 12% (=)
SNP: 2% (=)
Via
@BMGResearch
, 25-26 Mar.
Changes w/ 4-5 Mar.
https://x.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/2037596648059044086?s=20
Nigel is BACK
ONWARDS TO VICTORY!!!!
Leon
2
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
"Badenoch considers burka ban
Tories understood to be ‘looking closely’ at merits of veto on face coverings as part of a review of Islamism"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/03/27/kemi-badenoch-conservatives-burka-ban/
Poignantly, I saw a woman in a full burqa today, not far from my flat. I cannot know her inner state but her body language expressed great unhappiness. Weighed down by these hideous deathly black shrouds. I do not believe any woman under 60 - if any - would voluntarily wear these appalling garments, They are symbols of misogyny and TOOLS of misogyny
Kemi is right. Ban them
Tories understood to be ‘looking closely’ at merits of veto on face coverings as part of a review of Islamism"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/03/27/kemi-badenoch-conservatives-burka-ban/
Poignantly, I saw a woman in a full burqa today, not far from my flat. I cannot know her inner state but her body language expressed great unhappiness. Weighed down by these hideous deathly black shrouds. I do not believe any woman under 60 - if any - would voluntarily wear these appalling garments, They are symbols of misogyny and TOOLS of misogyny
Kemi is right. Ban them
Leon
3
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
I still remember that remarkable hotel I stayed at, in Chernivtsi, in southwest Ukraine, in the second summer of the warThis can't happen at all under the current regime and not for many years, if ever, under any other.
Get some Ukrainian help. They want to be part of the EU rather than a province of Russia; we need some military backbone.
The Rada is paralysed simultaneously by both corruption and anti-corruption investigations. Zelensky's traditional method of managing and motivating his Servant of the People coalition was, what was known in Ukraine as, 'мотивацию в конверте ' (lit. 'envelope motivation). That is, giving them money. Due to NABU investigations he can no longer do this and the result is paralysis.
The Rada has recently failed to pass the enabling legislation for the IMF loan and for progressing their EU candidature. Nothing positive can happen in this regard until they have regime change because the current junta is exhausted and fractured into incoherence.
It was incredibly luxurious, and I discovered it opened - OPENED - in the first year of the war. The menu featured caviar, oysters, whole tuna flown in from Tokyo. Next door was a deli selling Cohiba cigars and £300 bottles of Macallan
The clientele was a mix of stunningly beautiful young women, and muscled men with tatts and security guards who owned armoured Bentleys and bespoke Porsches, plus various families with their sons clearly hoping the muscled men could spirit their sons across the nearby Romanian border, in return for LOTS of money
I saw the scale of Ukrainian corruption, there and then. Gave me a new perspective on the war
Leon
1
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
InteractivePolls
@IAPolls2022
@Polymarket - 2026 U.S. Senate (chance of winning)
NORTH CAROLINA
🟦 Democrat: 81% (flip)
🟥 Republican: 20%
—
MAINE
🟦 Democrat: 74% (flip)
🟥 Republican: 27%
—
ALASKA
🟦 Mary Peltola: 52% (flip)
🟥 Dan Sullivan: 47%
—
GEORGIA
🟦 Democrat: 82% (new high)
🟥 Republican: 17%
—
MICHIGAN
🟦 Democrat: 82% (new high)
🟥 Republican: 18%
—
OHIO
🟦 Democrat: 54% (flip)
🟥 Republican: 47%
https://x.com/IAPolls2022/status/2037580473677832287
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
If you add in 2025 data though will look a lot different.It's been done:The doctor's case is very simple.I see doctors now take the hypocritic oath.I'm sure there is some justice in the doctor's case. But we all know that they'll finish up rich. My GP, who's a nice chap. often spends time in our consultations asking about my financial views. (Fair enough of course as I am very very very wise about such things. Well maybe.)
26% for me and 2.75% for thee:
Hundreds of British Medical Association employees are going on strike this weekend, accusing the “hypocritical” union of underpaying its own staff while demanding a 26 per cent rise for doctors.
Nearly 500 office-based employees at the doctors’ union will strike for 48 hours on Friday and Saturday, after being offered a below-inflation pay rise of 2.75 per cent for this year.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/article/bma-union-doctors-staff-strike-pay-zxszc7lj9
They want their pay today to be the same as it was before the Great Financial Crash Austerity, uprated by RPI.
Your opinion on whether this is justified will depend on your opinion of inflation index calculation, your opinion on whether doctors were overpaid prior to austerity, what has happened to averages wages since the Financial Crash, whether you think the country can afford well paid doctors, or maybe has to choose between more doctors and higher pay for doctors, etc.
I've been meaning to compare doctors pay to average earnings, etc, but haven't got around to it yet.
Thats missing i think a 22% rise over 24/25 and backdated for 23/24?
1
Re: What would Ronald Reagan think? – politicalbetting.com
Westminster Voting Intention:Broken, sleazy Labour on the slide!
RFM: 28% (+1)
LAB: 19% (-1)
CON: 18% (=)
GRN: 16% (+2)
LDM: 12% (=)
SNP: 2% (=)
Via
@BMGResearch
, 25-26 Mar.
Changes w/ 4-5 Mar.
https://x.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/2037596648059044086?s=20



