Labour have only been in power for 140 days but there’s a palpable sense of disappointment - not just on here but in organs like the FT which reflect, if not shape, global business opinion.We await the second coming of Maggie. Starmer cannot hold.
Reeves gave a great Mais Lecture at the beginning of this year, and there’s no shortage of what I might New Model Growthers floating around the Labour tent. As I’ve posted before, what is missing is an overall sense of strategy - a reason to believe.
Something has gone very wrong.
I’m not sure Starmer has the imagination to course-correct.
Well, I don't quite share the gloom and doom felt by most others on here on Labour's prospects, despite the admittedly shaky start. It's very early days, and those hoping for an economic renaissance after 5 months or so are not being realistic - let's see where we are in, say, 2027.On your last paragraph the biggest culprits for talking Britain down were Starmer and Reeves who actually caused the loss of confidence by business
Other than the economy, two other key metrics on which the government will be judged are NHS performance and legal/illegal immigration. On both these, I reckon early indicators are more promising. I think NHS waiting lists will fall quite quickly over the next two years. Legal migration will decline (I know, mainly because of actions taken by the previous government), and I judge some progress will be made on reducing small boat crossings: already, deportations of illegal migrants are up a fair bit, and combined with other stuff being done this will have a deterrent effect.
All to play for, I reckon, despite most people talking Britain down currently. There's still plenty of time for Starmer et al to under-promise and over-deliver. He's quite happy to eschew early popularity to pave the way for future dividends - nobody could accuse the government of taking easy decisions to court opinion poll popularity in its early days.
NEW from @IpsosUK 41% say they are worse off since Labour took office. 15% say better off.More https://t.co/JHjjhJiSnP pic.twitter.com/5UbOR0aA23
You don't need to pay any NI to qualify for the state pension in a year.This all depends on breaking the link between NI and qualification for the state pension.Fold NI into Income tax. This will save a fortune in administration as well.Not sure how much it would have raised but I would have preferred to see NI extended to all work - particularly those over retirement age who can still work without paying NI - and some way found to add it to unearned income as well.Labour have been truely bad for business. Every business owner I've spoken to (and there's been a few) have said that labour have done nothing for business and nothing for growth.I know it would have been even less popular, but would employee NI (Or better yet income tax) have been better (in the round) to whack the tax onto as the impact would have been (On it's own) deflationary (Less money in the economy) rather than inflationary (Businesses need to put prices up due to increased costs) ?
I get the feeling employer NI aside from the electoral benefit of not giving people a direct pay cut is actually the worst way economically to raise more tax...
Caricature is a nice spin."Another Maggie" in the sense of someone with the conviction and determination required to break the status quo, rather than someone who will bring in a caricature of her policies.She out in place some of the problems we're grappling with now.Labour have only been in power for 140 days but there’s a palpable sense of disappointment - not just on here but in organs like the FT which reflect, if not shape, global business opinion.We await the second coming of Maggie. Starmer cannot hold.
Reeves gave a great Mais Lecture at the beginning of this year, and there’s no shortage of what I might New Model Growthers floating around the Labour tent. As I’ve posted before, what is missing is an overall sense of strategy - a reason to believe.
Something has gone very wrong.
I’m not sure Starmer has the imagination to course-correct.
"Another Maggie" is not the answer.
Make the state pension and unemployment/disability benefit the same thing. Entitlement comes from inability to work, not age, and entitlement through “paying in” goes away. Phase in from one year after I am due to claim my various pensions.Paying income tax becomes the qualification.This all depends on breaking the link between NI and qualification for the state pension.Fold NI into Income tax. This will save a fortune in administration as well.Not sure how much it would have raised but I would have preferred to see NI extended to all work - particularly those over retirement age who can still work without paying NI - and some way found to add it to unearned income as well.Labour have been truely bad for business. Every business owner I've spoken to (and there's been a few) have said that labour have done nothing for business and nothing for growth.I know it would have been even less popular, but would employee NI (Or better yet income tax) have been better (in the round) to whack the tax onto as the impact would have been (On it's own) deflationary (Less money in the economy) rather than inflationary (Businesses need to put prices up due to increased costs) ?
I get the feeling employer NI aside from the electoral benefit of not giving people a direct pay cut is actually the worst way economically to raise more tax...
That would be bad news for humble and working class people who receive income via dividends etc.Paying income tax becomes the qualification.This all depends on breaking the link between NI and qualification for the state pension.Fold NI into Income tax. This will save a fortune in administration as well.Not sure how much it would have raised but I would have preferred to see NI extended to all work - particularly those over retirement age who can still work without paying NI - and some way found to add it to unearned income as well.Labour have been truely bad for business. Every business owner I've spoken to (and there's been a few) have said that labour have done nothing for business and nothing for growth.I know it would have been even less popular, but would employee NI (Or better yet income tax) have been better (in the round) to whack the tax onto as the impact would have been (On it's own) deflationary (Less money in the economy) rather than inflationary (Businesses need to put prices up due to increased costs) ?
I get the feeling employer NI aside from the electoral benefit of not giving people a direct pay cut is actually the worst way economically to raise more tax...
Chancellor getting sacked after a poorly received first budget? Sounds a bit Kwasi!She wont be CoE by next GE is my prediction. Possibly gone as soon as next May's reshuffle.She’s polling worse than Starmer!He's not going to fire Reeves!Too tied in with Reeves I reckon, was hopeless last time I heard him on the morning round.Who could Starmer go for as new chancellor ?Darren Jones would be my pick.
Cooper looks the only serious alternative to my eyes tbh.
Starmer would cop a massive loss of authority from firing Reeves tho.
https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2024/11/19/a-promising-start-for-kemi-badenoch/
Perhaps he could ennoble Ed Balls and bring him in? Though I can't see wanting to give up his lucrative media career now.Too tied in with Reeves I reckon, was hopeless last time I heard him on the morning round.Who could Starmer go for as new chancellor ?Darren Jones would be my pick.
Cooper looks the only serious alternative to my eyes tbh.
Starmer would cop a massive loss of authority from firing Reeves tho.