Best Of
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
An endowment mortgage was an interest only mortgage with a separate endowment policy that was supposed to repay the capitalIn 1990 you would have been but was that an endowment mortgage that you had ? I thought interest only mortgages only appeared in the 2000s.I might have my dates wrong but I was certainly paying circa 18% on an interest only mortgage in the 1990s.Are you sure about that ?I bought that house in Whitchurch in Cardiff as a doer upper in 1991 for £62,000. Houses in that road were going for around £90K. I sold it in 2000 for £135K. However when the mortgage rate starts at a little over 10% in 1991 hitting the dizzy heights of 18% a few years later was no joke.18% of what, though?Circa 1995 would have coincided with my 18% Bradford and Bingley mortgage rate...Oh to have been in a position to buy a house in 1995...Not sure about your date range, although the 1992 to 1997 Tory Government produced some comedy gold.1989 to 2001 was the really rosy time imo.My guess is that 75% of the movement in public opinion on Brexit is nostalgia for the time before Trump, Covid and Ukraine.Nostalgia for an imaginary period before Brexit.
The 2006-2016 period wasn't the best in the UK - bank crashes, high unemployment, uncontrolled immigration and then public spending restrictions.
You'd have to go back to between 1995 and 2005 for a period when things seemed good and the future rosy.
Sadly I was twelve.
I have a friend who bought a house in Cambridge for 550k last year. Was sold in 1995 for 35k. Renovated, but no loft conversion or floor space extension.
Interest rates peaked in October 1989 and were steadily falling throughout 1991 and 1992 (bar the one day wonder of Black Wednesday) and haven't been above 10% since September 1991:
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/database/Bank-Rate.asp
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Then: "I urge the Iranian people to sieze this moment and rise up. Free yourselves."
Now: "I will share the oil through the Straits with whoever is the ayatollah"
Is it any wonder the people of Iran have not risen up.
Now: "I will share the oil through the Straits with whoever is the ayatollah"
Is it any wonder the people of Iran have not risen up.
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
UmmmmmmmSo that would be all of them?
*FCC BANS IMPORTS OF ALL FOREIGN-MADE CONSUMER-GRADE ROUTERS
https://bsky.app/profile/peark.es/post/3mhqxkgtmv22e
I guess Americans no longer need to be online.
glw
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Some tasks are beyond even the greatest heroes of antquity and myth, never mind a modern politician.Judged by his stated goals of getting Britain to join the Euro and getting the Labour party to love Peter Mandelson, he was a complete flop.The process had been going for years before Blair was in government.Peace in Northern Island.48 quarters of successive growthThere was never a better time to be PM than what Blair had.The Blair Years...My guess is that 75% of the movement in public opinion on Brexit is nostalgia for the time before Trump, Covid and Ukraine.Nostalgia for an imaginary period before Brexit.
The 2006-2016 period wasn't the best in the UK - bank crashes, high unemployment, uncontrolled immigration and then public spending restrictions.
You'd have to go back to between 1995 and 2005 for a period when things seemed good and the future rosy.
And what did he achieve during it ?
What did Blair initiate as PM ?
Student tuition fees
Unrestricted immigration
Devolution
Anything else ?
kle4
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
And yet, the Tories had a reputation for fiscal prudence. This was yet another example of their fiscal ineptitude.In the late 1980s the narrative of negative equity was all the rage. My flat in Peterborough went on the market at £62,000. It fell through and I sold it for £43K. That fell through and the final selling price was £29,000. Fortunately in 1983 I had paid 25 grand for it.Buying a house is so 1990s, now you just have to hope to inherit one in your 60s! Better that than encourage housebuilding.Oh to have been in a position to buy a house in 1995...Not sure about your date range, although the 1992 to 1997 Tory Government produced some comedy gold.1989 to 2001 was the really rosy time imo.My guess is that 75% of the movement in public opinion on Brexit is nostalgia for the time before Trump, Covid and Ukraine.Nostalgia for an imaginary period before Brexit.
The 2006-2016 period wasn't the best in the UK - bank crashes, high unemployment, uncontrolled immigration and then public spending restrictions.
You'd have to go back to between 1995 and 2005 for a period when things seemed good and the future rosy.
Sadly I was twelve.
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
I may not be up to date but has Congress even once debated this war?I think some Democrats have introduced resolutions and the Republicans have voted them down. So Congress has had its say, but seems to be stuck on party lines at the moment.
Tens of billions of tax $ being spent on the whims of one man, let alone the human cost.
And there is silence.
Shining city on the hill my arse.
It does say least mean they Congressional Republicans share responsibility for the debacle with Trump.
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Are you sure about that ?I bought that house in Whitchurch in Cardiff as a doer upper in 1991 for £62,000. Houses in that road were going for around £90K. I sold it in 2000 for £135K. However when the mortgage rate starts at a little over 10% in 1991 hitting the dizzy heights of 18% a few years later was no joke.18% of what, though?Circa 1995 would have coincided with my 18% Bradford and Bingley mortgage rate...Oh to have been in a position to buy a house in 1995...Not sure about your date range, although the 1992 to 1997 Tory Government produced some comedy gold.1989 to 2001 was the really rosy time imo.My guess is that 75% of the movement in public opinion on Brexit is nostalgia for the time before Trump, Covid and Ukraine.Nostalgia for an imaginary period before Brexit.
The 2006-2016 period wasn't the best in the UK - bank crashes, high unemployment, uncontrolled immigration and then public spending restrictions.
You'd have to go back to between 1995 and 2005 for a period when things seemed good and the future rosy.
Sadly I was twelve.
I have a friend who bought a house in Cambridge for 550k last year. Was sold in 1995 for 35k. Renovated, but no loft conversion or floor space extension.
Interest rates peaked in October 1989 and were steadily falling throughout 1991 and 1992 (bar the one day wonder of Black Wednesday) and haven't been above 10% since September 1991:
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/boeapps/database/Bank-Rate.asp
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
You're putting the cart before the horse.48 quarters of successive growthThere was never a better time to be PM than what Blair had.The Blair Years...My guess is that 75% of the movement in public opinion on Brexit is nostalgia for the time before Trump, Covid and Ukraine.Nostalgia for an imaginary period before Brexit.
The 2006-2016 period wasn't the best in the UK - bank crashes, high unemployment, uncontrolled immigration and then public spending restrictions.
You'd have to go back to between 1995 and 2005 for a period when things seemed good and the future rosy.
And what did he achieve during it ?
Blair didn't achieve 48 quarters of growth.
The 48 quarters of growth was why it was such a good time to be PM.
The issue being that many of the problems that the country has suffered since arose in those 48 quarters.
Including 45 successive quarters of trade deficit, 45 successive quarters of falling manufacturing employment and such like for rising house prices and increasing personal debt.
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Shashank JoshiThis really might end up taking the record for the dumbest war ever, against some fierce competition.
@shashj
·
1h
The war aim is now re-opening a strait that would not have been closed were it not for the war itself.
https://x.com/shashj/status/2036175213440774284
glw
7


