ridaligo
-
Re: BoJo’s Tories are arguably more vulnerable to the LDs at the next election than LAB – politicalbetti
OK, a qualifier "I don't approve of him becoming a political activist* if he's not allowed to be scrutinized / criticised and if he's using it for commercial gain" ... then I have a problem… (View Post)1 -
Re: BoJo’s Tories are arguably more vulnerable to the LDs at the next election than LAB – politicalbetti
No, I guarantee I wouldn't support him if he campaigned to defund the police. There's no need to be abusive. I just hold the opinion that Marcus Rashford's motives are not entirely altruistic and he … (View Post)1 -
Re: BoJo’s Tories are arguably more vulnerable to the LDs at the next election than LAB – politicalbetti
Well the obvious answer would be that I get to vote for the policies and tax plans of Starmer, Johnson et al but I don't remember voting for Marcus Rashford. I have no problem with him contributing t… (View Post)1 -
Re: BoJo’s Tories are arguably more vulnerable to the LDs at the next election than LAB – politicalbetti
Don't worry on my account. I have no problem with being offended. You go ahead and engage in whatever political activism you want as long as I get the right to criticise you. How about that as a deal? (View Post)1 -
Re: BoJo’s Tories are arguably more vulnerable to the LDs at the next election than LAB – politicalbetti
Sadly, yes ... but The Spectator should stand its ground, as should other critics of these virtue signallers (i.e. hypocrites). In a democracy, critics perform a vital role, which should not be silen… (View Post)1