rcs1000
-
Re: Unlikely villains: Sir Geoffrey Howe – politicalbetting.com
His point about making Directors legally responsible for clean ups is also spot on: otherwise you have a heads I win, tails you lose type situation. (View Post)2 -
Re: Unlikely villains: Sir Geoffrey Howe – politicalbetting.com
As an aside, @Richard_Tyndall's fundamental point - that you concentrate on the demand side of the equation - is absolutely correct. There is exactly zero benefit to preventing UK exploitation o… (View Post)3 -
Re: Unlikely villains: Sir Geoffrey Howe – politicalbetting.com
I have some very entertaining stories I can share over a beer on just this subject. (View Post)1 -
Re: Unlikely villains: Sir Geoffrey Howe – politicalbetting.com
Some of the bigger oil companies sell to smaller ones solely to dodge clean up costs. The smaller one runs it for a few years, doesn't save for the cleanup, pays the Directors massive bonuses, a… (View Post)3 -
Re: Unlikely villains: Sir Geoffrey Howe – politicalbetting.com
The problem is that most of the people who support fracking have very little idea of what is involved. And, I'm not talking about environmental impact or net zero. I'm talking about the fac… (View Post)4
