glw
-
Re: The Law of Unintended Consequences – politicalbetting.com
Those months of doom-mongering simply show how inept Reeves is. Starmer would do more to reassure the markets by sacking her than anything Reeves is likely to say. (View Post)1 -
Re: Rebuild, copy or destroy – how should we deal with our cities’ history? – politicalbetting.com
There is already war against Ukraine, it might help Putin a little, but Putin didn't need Trump doing something crazy to do what he's done. I think the bigger issue will be Taiwan. If Trump really wa… (View Post)3 -
Re: In 2027 will I be writing 'Shortly there will be an election, in which Labour will increase its majo
If Harris had won I think Labour would be in a decent place, navigating the effects of another Trump presidency looks very tricky to me. Some of the stuff Trump might do could cause us real problems. (View Post)1 -
Re: Never put off until tomorrow… – politicalbetting.com
I look forward to the usual suspects bro-splaining why this is in fact a genius move and good for Farage/Reform and therefore the UK, and not the ravings of a dangerous lunatic. (View Post)1 -
Re: Will the Ayrshire hotelier follow Musk’s lead in renouncing Farage? – politicalbetting.com
Yeah Elon's so worried about sexual abuse that he's best pals with Trump. I don't know what has really started all this off but I doubt that Elon's concern is sincere. (View Post)2