fencesitter2
-
Re: Election night guide – politicalbetting.com
Since lots of people are posting their predictions, here is mine: LAB 390 CON 160 LD 45 SNP 25 REF 6 Others 6 Rationale for the relatively "high" CON figure: In the "blue wall" la… (View Post)1 -
Re: This bodes ill for the Tories & Reform – politicalbetting.com
Yes, but looking at the tables, most of those criteria wouldn't cause much change in the weighting. @Pulpstar has found the one that is making the difference: the recalled vote from the 2019 GE. In t… (View Post)2 -
Re: This bodes ill for the Tories & Reform – politicalbetting.com
Looking at the data tables for this (available from here), the raw numbers are: LAB 160 LDM 64 CON 130 GRN 20 RFM 26 So there's some hefty weighting going on to arrive at the percentages above. Can a… (View Post)4 -
Re: Only 17% of Americans expect Trump to serve time – politicalbetting.com
Just to provide the verdict of a third model, the Economist reckons Bicester and Woodstock will be Con 32 Lab 30 LD 19 Ref 8 Green 7 ie that the lack of tactical voting (or confused tactical voting) … (View Post)1 -
Re: Who’s Fooling Whom? – politicalbetting.com
@BlancheLivermore 's musical recommendations are a great reason to come to PB at the moment. I'd never heard of Fanny, or Jenny and the Mexicats (another great discovery from a few days ago). Thank y… (View Post)1