SirNorfolkPassmore
-
Re: The polling on Roe v Wade looks bad for the Supreme Court – politicalbetting.com
I don't think this would work for several reasons. Firstly, you have to define seniority. Is a judge on the Nebraska Supreme Court equivalent to one on the California Supreme Court? I'm sur… (View Post)1 -
Re: The polling on Roe v Wade looks bad for the Supreme Court – politicalbetting.com
I think you're taking a very originalist approach to the constitution. Lots of lawyers, myself included, would say that is very much NOT a sensible legal approach. Indeed, even the most extreme … (View Post)3 -
Re: Punters far from convinced that Johnson is going – politicalbetting.com
I think it requires a cabinet rebellion at this stage. One can't tell for sure as the confidence vote is secret and it is far from guaranteed that Johnson swept up the payroll vote. But it seems… (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters far from convinced that Johnson is going – politicalbetting.com
Johnson isn't interested in "party" funding. If the money men cut off funding for his wallpaper and tree-houses, then you're talking. (View Post)5 -
Re: Interesting by-election stats from the Indy’s John Rentoul – politicalbetting.com
I agree, although being very pedantic, it's "time immemorial" rather than "time in memorial". Also "time immemorial" refers to a time which is not reliably recorded… (View Post)1