It wouldn't be under the "same amendment". The "natural born citizen" qualification for the Presidency has nothing to do with the 14th amendment - it's part of the origi… (View Post)

That isn't a viable workaround at all. You cannot possibly have a situation where a person is disqualified from being US President in Colorado but not in Texas. The entire point of SCOTUS is to … (View Post)

Whilst I tend to agree that this is most likely to be the route used by conservative SCOTUS justices to exempt Trump, I concede that the Colorado Supreme Court judgment makes a good counterargument o… (View Post)

That allows SCOTUS to decide for Trump on the grounds either that he isn't an "officer", or that insurrection requires a conviction. I still think the former is more likely. I think th… (View Post)

I think there is next to no chance of the Supreme Court deciding against Trump on this one. However, to OGH's point that three Supreme Court justices were Trump appointees, ironically they are n… (View Post)