SirNorfolkPassmore
-
Re: Trump’s WH2024 bid looks set to be decided by the Supreme Court – politicalbetting.com
That allows SCOTUS to decide for Trump on the grounds either that he isn't an "officer", or that insurrection requires a conviction. I still think the former is more likely. I think th… (View Post)1 -
Re: Trump’s WH2024 bid looks set to be decided by the Supreme Court – politicalbetting.com
I think there is next to no chance of the Supreme Court deciding against Trump on this one. However, to OGH's point that three Supreme Court justices were Trump appointees, ironically they are n… (View Post)6 -
Re: Trump’s WH2024 bid looks set to be decided by the Supreme Court – politicalbetting.com
Whilst SCOTUS has a lot of flexibility in which cases it takes and when, it seems hard to push it to the other side of the election given that states are deciding who people can vote for. That may no… (View Post)3 -
Re: OFSTED’S report – politicalbetting.com
Ideally, you shouldn't "dish out honours to your mates" regardless of whether you've done a year or not. Call me an idealist. (View Post)6 -
Re: OFSTED’S report – politicalbetting.com
How bad was it that it wasn't worth the money, despite being free? (View Post)4