SirNorfolkPassmore
-
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
There's a fair element of truth in that. The trouble is that, to maintain it, they do need their so-called "levelling up" agenda to deliver. I recall a chap interviewed in Hartlepool w… (View Post)3 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
PS. Following on from what I said, I've had a quick look at the ledgers in Passmore Towers, and it does seem Eastbourne was, by some way, Ms St Clair's best by-election performance. So ther… (View Post)1 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
That was Lindi St Clair, who was a fairly well known personality at one time and stood repeatedly in by-elections. At one point, she was reported to have offered to defect to the Lib Dems in exchange… (View Post)1 -
Re: The LDs take Chesham and Amersham with a 25% CON to LD swing – politicalbetting.com
As so many Tories on here didn't say the morning after Hartlepool. (View Post)4 -
Re: The LDs take Chesham and Amersham with a 25% CON to LD swing – politicalbetting.com
The Labour Leader has no power to sack the Labour Deputy Leader. Starmer can't sack Rayner, just as Corbyn couldn't sack Watson. (View Post)4
