SirNorfolkPassmore
-
Re: LD by-election objectives – Win or lose deposit – politicalbetting.com
And the public expectation is what happens. The post is wrong - it refers to other offences where it's correct - if you're sentenced to nine years for GBH, you're eligible to apply for… (View Post)2 -
Re: LD by-election objectives – Win or lose deposit – politicalbetting.com
Not the case here for the step-mother. Her sentence is LIFE as is mandatory for murder. The minimum term is 29 years - not eligible to even apply for parole until 2050 (possibly 2049 - not sure how l… (View Post)3 -
Re: LD by-election objectives – Win or lose deposit – politicalbetting.com
On topic, I'd quibble on two points. Firstly, in relation to "this is happening without any agreement or talks between the red and orange camps", I very much doubt there has been no cr… (View Post)2 -
Re: Contrasting betting charts for two very different by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Net spend is extremely misleading as it's all transfer fee, I believe. That's just not how accounting for player cost works as you spread that over several years and it tends to be (althoug… (View Post)2 -
Re: Old Bexley & Sidcup: The betting overstates CON chances – politicalbetting.com
Different situation as Labour Deputy Leader is an elected position. Blair genuinely liked Prescott - an unwavering loyalist with an instinctive understanding of Labour's core vote whom Blair was… (View Post)2