SirNorfolkPassmore
-
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
Yeah, I'm happy about the result and everything. But I did prefer it when Miley Cyrus did it, if I'm honest. (View Post)1 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
Total nonsense for the Sun to make Chesham & Amersham into some kind of repudiation of Starmer rather than Johnson. Hartlepool, fair enough. Batley & Spen, if it's lost, ditto. But Labou… (View Post)3 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
That really is utter tosh, Philip, and totally misunderstands the planning system. Firstly, opposing a very major relaxation of the planning process isn't "opposing all construction". … (View Post)1 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
There's a fair element of truth in that. The trouble is that, to maintain it, they do need their so-called "levelling up" agenda to deliver. I recall a chap interviewed in Hartlepool w… (View Post)3 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
PS. Following on from what I said, I've had a quick look at the ledgers in Passmore Towers, and it does seem Eastbourne was, by some way, Ms St Clair's best by-election performance. So ther… (View Post)1
