SirNorfolkPassmore
-
Re: Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News refutes Team Trump’s voter fraud assertions – politicalbetting.com
It's up to the Government how they arrive at the Order laid before Parliament and what input they get. I'd be surprised if they didn't involve the Scottish Government, but Cummings pri… (View Post)1 -
Re: Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News refutes Team Trump’s voter fraud assertions – politicalbetting.com
It is, although it's an unusual type of statutory instrument in that it's subject to the "affirmative procedure" whereby it is voted on (but cannot be amended) by Parliament. It… (View Post)2 -
Re: Revealed – Trump’s plan to lose again at WH2024 – politicalbetting.com
"The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equ… (View Post)1 -
Re: Revealed – Trump’s plan to lose again at WH2024 – politicalbetting.com
If you read the rest of the case, that's clearly explained as being for future elections - they are absolutely not saying they can retrospectively change the system of selecting electors which h… (View Post)2 -
Re: Revealed – Trump’s plan to lose again at WH2024 – politicalbetting.com
That is the absolute opposite of correct and I suggest you read Bush v Gore again (or, in reality, for the first time). The point of the case is (in summary) that the constitution doesn't prescr… (View Post)1