Sandpit
Sandpit
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Pub landlords not happy with Rachel. How does a small business find an extra five grand a month? https://x.com/laraincornwall/status/1993749174404444230 Can we talk about the business rate value reas… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
All those millionaires heading to Dubai. Great news for my business, not so great for Rachel. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Is there anyone in the Cabinet who’s worked in management at any business? Most of them appear to have backgrounds in public sector, NGO, unions etc, none of them have ever needed to attract customer… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
It’s yet more tinkering which just upsets a number of identifiable and organised groups of people. I’m still of the opinion that if they knew the Budget was going to be unpopular, they should have bi… (View Post)4 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
So almost none of the leaked and trailed measures actually went into the budget. Everyone who was expecting an ‘exit tax’ and planning accordingly, will now carry on doing so in the expectation that … (View Post)4
