Sandpit
Sandpit
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Exhibit 1: https://news.sky.com/story/edward-colston-statue-four-protesters-found-not-guilty-of-criminal-damage-after-toppling-monument-of-slave-trader-12509488 (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
They first set up a company to handle their income, which was novel at the time, and then they moved to the US. (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
What they’re trying to do, as many of us suggested beforehand, is to try and drag a couple of hundred thousand people kicking and screaming into the £100k 60% tax bracket. Except that won’t happen, b… (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Pub landlords not happy with Rachel. How does a small business find an extra five grand a month? https://x.com/laraincornwall/status/1993749174404444230 Can we talk about the business rate value reas… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
All those millionaires heading to Dubai. Great news for my business, not so great for Rachel. (View Post)2
