No, the jury were asked a specific question and gave their answer. The judge then decided that their answer actually meant the opposite to the answer the jury gave in writing. That’s a judge problem. (View Post)

Yes it’s possibly one of the only cases in legal history where the (politically-appointed) judge tried to overturn the view of the jury, in saying that someone was guilty of something that the jury h… (View Post)

Wrong then, and wrong now. (Although it’s going to be enormously entertaining to see how Mr Sussex deals with what could be eight figures in costs. I’m sure the lawyers of the day were somewhat more … (View Post)

I know that I defend Trump more than most on here, but he really isn’t evil. Misguided, self-serving, unwilling to listen to others, guilty as charged. But that doesn’t make someone evil. Putin and K… (View Post)

He was adjudicated *NOT* to have raped E Jean Carroll in a civil court. (View Post)