Did they actually say "probable low resistance"? How can they say that if there is no evidence on efficacy? (View Post)

The execs are too busy diving into vaults full of money Scrooge McDuck style. (View Post)

Journalist can only fixate on one number at a time. And don't even get them started with one number divided by another. (View Post)

That would be hugely surprising given the immune response was virtually identical between the younger and older cohorts. There is no evidence suggesting it isn't effective at all ages. (View Post)

People aren't banned from going to work, are they? (View Post)