It's the proportion of a single number, not of the exponential curve. (View Post)

You do if you want to show growth as a straight line rather than an exponential curve. It's easier to see what is happening at the start, otherwise it gets drowned out by the enormous peak. (View Post)

How is it misleading? Log plots are useful for this kind of data. The point it conveys is that the current curves are tracking the last wave quite closely, except for deaths of course. (View Post)

I'm just saying your claim that "virtually 100% of JCVI Groups 1-9 have had two jabs" is wrong. (View Post)

Why should it be on a linear scale? It's ideal if you want to compare growth rates, as the gradient of the line would be the same regardless of the absolute number in each wave. Normalizing it t… (View Post)