But you were claiming the political editor of the Mirror had them. (View Post)

Perhaps the assumptions are meant to be wrong? And surely you know what assumptions are being disputed, unless you've not actually been reading the comments of those you've been criticising? (View Post)

You think HMG would have to pay for coverage of that? Edit: also, as @dixiedean pointed out, the message is dated from the 17th. (View Post)

So you think the scientist would have no idea what would happen to the output of the model if they used a higher rate of transmissibility, or lower vaccine effectiveness? (View Post)

Yeah, it does. It doesn't take a genius to work out that using a higher estimate for the transmissibility (for example) will lead to a higher number of cases etc. (View Post)